Arts Updates 2012-13kmea.org/CONFERENCE/handouts/2013/DuncanProgramReview.pdf · ECE and Arts...

Preview:

Citation preview

Arts Updates 2012-13 Kentucky Music Educators Association

February 12, 2013

Louisville, Ky.

Greetings

Today’s Goals

•Standards update

•Arts Integration

•Program Reviews

Standards updates

• American Alliance for Theatre and Education

• Arts Education Partnership

• The College Board

• Educational Theatre Association

• National Association for Music Education

• National Art Education Association

• National Dance Education Organization

• State Education Agency Directors of Arts Education

• The 1994 Standards are nearly 20 years old, a normal revision cycle is 6 to 8 years

• To reflect the 21st Century needs of students, teachers, parents, and administrators

• Emphasis on Common Core subject areas for federal accountability system + STEM subjects is marginalizing arts learning

• To re-assert that the arts are core academic subjects taught by highly qualified teachers, as stated in ESEA

The need for revised standards (Professional and Political)

Our teams leading the way

• More than 380 individuals applied to serve on five

art discipline standards writing teams

• NCCAS’s professional organizations chose teams

based on skills in teaching, standards and

curriculum writing, assessment and leadership, and

practical knowledge in their area of expertise

• Visit http://nccas.wikispaces.com for a complete

list of writers

1. Best practice based on research (College Board)

2. Dance, Music, Theatre, Visual Arts and Media Arts standards

3. An organizing framework for five arts disciplines that includes:

• Philosophical foundations/Lifelong goals

• Enduring Understandings/Essential Questions

• Observable and measurable standards

• Illustrative assessments and student work in a web-based environment

The Next Generation Standards will include:

Artistic Processes

• Create

• Perform/Present

• Respond

• Connect (dance,

media arts, theatre)

• Some drafts are likely to be complete and ready for internal review in March 2013.

• A full public review is planned for late summer or fall this year.

• Updated information will be posted on the NCCAS wiki site regularly during this period.

http://www.nccas.wikispaces.com

• The current goal is to have a finished draft of the complete standards by late 2013, ready for posting in an “Evergreen” web-based environment in 2014.

• Population of student work and other tools and resources on the website will continue, along with revisions, throughout 2014.

Current work and timeline

How are we going to integrate the arts?

The Kennedy Center’s Definition of

Arts Integration

Three Variations

Arts as

Curriculum

Arts

Enhanced

Curriculum

Arts

Integrated

Curriculum

Gene Wilhoit, Executive Director, Council of Chief

State School Officers

The Arts and Achievement in At-Risk Youth: Findings from Four Longitudinal Studies

National Endowment for the Arts study,

James S. Catterall

resources

O Arts Academies

O Social Studies and the arts

O World languages and the arts

O Emergent literacy and the arts

O Upper grades proposed

O STEAM proposed

O ECE and the arts coming in March

ECE and Arts Integration O Kentucky public school teachers teams of Exceptional Child

Education (ECE) and Arts teacher in grades 3-8.

O This Institute will consist of three components: (1) 6-hour

PD, (2) a two-day artist residency, spring of 2013, and (3) a

Summit meeting for sharing of lesson plans and student

work.

O The deadline to apply is February 11, 2013. For further

information and application form please go

to: http://www.kentuckycenter.org/content/downloads/ECE

-Arts-Integration2013.pdf. or contact Stacy Ridgway

at sridgway@kentuckycenter.org or 502-562-0711 (email

preferred).

O This program is provided under a contract with The John F.

Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts.

Program reviews

Term clarifications

O ARTS teachers: any teacher

responsible for delivery of arts

instruction

O Teachers: any school personnel with

responsibility for instruction

O ALL teachers: All certified personnel

within a school including librarians,

counselors, administrators, etc.

Term clarifications O Regularly :implies that something is done at the

same time periodically O Students regularly reflect on, critique and evaluate the artistic

products and performances of others and themselves as is

grade level and age appropriate.

O Routinely: implies that something is done often

O Students, with teacher guidance, routinely use creative,

evaluative, analytical and problem solving skills in developing

and/or reflecting in their artistic performances and products.

A change… O Curriculum and Instruction,

Demonstrator 1, Characteristic b:

O “...150 minutes…” moved to

Distinguished

O Can not be found in KAR nor KRS

O Clarifying bullets added for all grade

levels at Proficient, Distinguished and

Needs Improvement levels of

implementation

All program reviews must be entered into ASSIST for 2012-13 O Data entered into the 2011-12

diagnostic will not carry over

O Copy and paste from 2011-12

O Utilize the working document

O Arts and Humanities, Practical

Living/Career Studies and Writing; K-3

for the field test

O Diagnostic tools available this month

What to expect in ASSIST O Check box evidence list is gone

O A required text box has been added for schools

to list their evidence

O A required text box has been added for schools

to write a rationale explaining how the evidence

identified supports the level of implementation

for a given demonstrator

O A separate Next Steps diagnostic for schools to

discuss plans for sustainability, improvement

support OGuidelines for Program Review

Evidence

OReconciliation document

OWorking documents

Oweb-based professional learning

O K-3

O ASSIST

evidence

O Natural result of teaching and learning

O Student product

O Students have met standards and objectives

O Occurs on an ongoing basis

O Supports the stated rationale

O Could a reasonable outside person look at a

school’s evidence and reach the same

conclusion about a program rating as the

school team did?

Program review accountability

O The Unbridled Learning accountability model is

organized around the Kentucky Board of Education’s

four strategic priorities: Next-Generation Learners, Next-Generation Instructional Programs and Support

(Program Reviews), Next-Generation Professionals and Next-Generation Schools/ Districts.

Program review accountability

O The recent first release of data from the

Unbridled Learning model included only the Next-

Generation Learners component (Achievement

[Proficiency], Gap, Growth, Readiness for

College/Career and Graduation Rate). Schools have already received their 2012-13 Next-

Generation Learner Overall Scores as targets for

Proficient. In the fall of 2013, the second round of data from the

model will be released, and that data will include both

Next-Generation Learners and Next-Generation

Instructional Programs and Support (Program Reviews).

Program review accountability O The Program Review scores will have two roles in

the summer of 2013: 1) Schools will see a publicly-reported Program Review

classification (Needs Improvement, Proficient, Distinguished) for

each subject (AH/PLCS/Writing). 2) Scores will provide a baseline for the combined accountability

model that includes Next-Generation Learner and Next-

Generation Instructional Programs and Support (Program

Reviews) and the Overall Score as the target for Proficient in

2013-14.

Data for ALL Program Reviews MUST be entered in ASSIST by

June 1, 2013. During the school year 2013-14, schools and districts should be

working to improve baseline data. This gives schools an opportunity

to make modifications in program areas that need improvement.

Program review contacts O Arts & Humanities

Robert Duncan (robert.duncan@education.ky.gov)

O PL/CS

O PE & Health Jamie Sparks (jamie.sparks@education.ky.gov)

Todd Davis (todd.davis@education.ky.gov)

Stephanie Bunge (stephanie.bunge@education.ky.gov)

O Careers Leslie Slaughter (leslie.slaughter@education.ky.gov)

Matt Chaliff (matt.chaliff@education.ky.gov)

O Writing Jackie Rogers (jackie.rogers@education.ky.gov) ,Kelly Clark (kelly.clark@education.ky.gov)

O K-3 Rebecca Atkins-Stumbo (rebecca.atkins-stumbo@education.ky.gov)

O World Language Jacque Van Houten (jacque.vanhouten@education.ky.gov)

O Accountability Rae McEntyre (rae.mcentyre@education.ky.gov)

Recommended