View
2
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
1
Aspirational Goal 1 (Part 1) and Bridge to Excellence Master Plan Update
Presenter(s):Jamie Aliveto, Director, System Accountability & School Improvement (SASI)
Natalie Gay, Coordinator, System Accountability & School Improvement (SASI)
System Accountability & School Improvement, Accelerated Achievement and Equity, Curriculum,
Instruction, and Innovation, andSchool Administration and Leadership
October 11, 2017
Academics, Communications, Technology and Student Achievement
ASPIRATIONAL GOAL 1:FCPS will equip each and every student to be an
empowered learner and an engaged citizen to achieve a positive impact in the local and global community.
• Priority 1—FCPS will provide each and every student high quality instruction that fosters inquiry, creative thinking, complex problem solving, and collaboration.
• Priority 2—FCPS will raise achievement for all students and eliminate achievement gaps.
• Priority 1—FCPS will provide each and every student high quality instruction that fosters inquiry, creative thinking, complex problem solving, and collaboration.
• Priority 2—FCPS will raise achievement for all students and eliminate achievement gaps.
2
Priorities 1 and 2—High Quality Instruction, Raising Achievement for All Students, Closing Achievement Gaps:
Performance on accountability tests (PARCC Performance) with a focus on each English learners, students with special needs, and
Additional Master Plan Components: H.S.A. Data House Bill 412-State and Local Mandated
Assessments
Additional Goal 1 Measures (Part 2)
Perceptual data related to high quality instruction College and Career Readiness measures Post secondary measures (no longer available from MSDE) Access to advanced coursework Local assessment measures
(To be presented 10/25/17)
3
PARCC English Performance Levels 3-52015 -2017 Results—Percent of Test Takers
PARCCASSESSMENT
LEVELS 3-5(% of Test Takers*)
2015 2016 2017
Gra
des
3-8
ELA 03 76.7 72.0 73.9ELA 04 77.3 78.8 79.2ELA 05 77.6 77.9 79.2ELA 06 79.3 73.8 75.5ELA 07 67.7 73.2 74.6ELA 08 68.9 71.8 72.0
Hig
h Sc
hool
ELA 10 69.6 73.8 81.5
* Data also includes (when applicable) students receiving services in non-public settings (e.g., LEA24).
>5% increase
<5% increase
Decrease in percent
Goal 1: Performance on Accountability Tests-ELA Trend
PARCC English Performance Levels 4-52015 - 2017 Results—Percent of Test Takers
PARCCASSESSMENT
LEVELS 4-5(% of Test Takers*)
2015 2016 2017
Gra
des
3-8
ELA 03 56.2 48.2 49.8ELA 04 49.4 52.5 53.5ELA 05 49.8 51.1 55.6ELA 06 48.1 44.1 48.8ELA 07 40.2 48.2 52.6ELA 08 41.0 47.3 49.0
Hig
h Sc
hool
ELA 10 50.9 56.0 64.1
* Data also includes (when applicable) students receiving services in non-public settings (e.g., LEA24).
>5% increase
<5% increase
Decrease in percent
Goal 1: Performance on Accountability Tests-ELA Trend
4
PARCC Math Performance Levels 3-52015 - 2017 Results—Percent of Test Takers
PARCCASSESSMENT
LEVELS 3-5(% of Test Takers*)
2015 2016 2017
Gra
des
3-8
MATH 03 77.1 78.2 80.4MATH 04 73.0 77.8 77.7MATH 05 75.0 77.3 77.7MATH 06 72.7 75.7 73.6MATH 07 71.3 74.3 75.3MATH 08 59.0 62.8 66.3
ALG 01 71.7 76.5 80.3
* Data also includes (when applicable) students receiving services in non-public settings (e.g., LEA24).
>5% increase
<5% increase
Decrease in percent
Goal 1: Performance on Accountability Tests- Math Trend
PARCC Math Performance Levels 4-52015 - 2017 Results—Percent of Test Takers
PARCCASSESSMENT
LEVELS 4-5(% of Test Takers*)
2015 2016 2017
Gra
des
3-8
MATH 03 51.6 54.6 55.4MATH 04 43.9 53.3 49.8MATH 05 43.1 51.8 50.1MATH 06 41.1 47.2 45.7MATH 07 35.9 41.8 42.7MATH 08 26.0 34.1 37.2
ALG 01 43.9 50.9 59.6
* Data also includes (when applicable) students receiving services in non-public settings (e.g., LEA24).
>5% increase
<5% increase
Decrease in percent
Goal 1: Performance on Accountability Tests-Math Trend
5
PARCC English Performance Levels 3-5MSDE vs. FCPS 2017 Results—Percent of Test Takers
PARCCASSESSMENT
LEVELS 3-5(% of Test Takers)
MSDE FCPS State Rank
Gra
des
3-8
ELA 03 61.6 73.9 6th
ELA 04 67.3 79.2 4th
ELA 05 66.6 79.2 4th
ELA 06 66.0 75.5 7th
ELA 07 67.2 74.6 8th
ELA 08 62.1 72.0 6th
Hig
h Sc
hool
ELA 10 66.8 81.5 4th
>15% above state
>10‐14.9% above state
<10% above state
Goal 1: Performance on Accountability Tests-ELA State Comparison/Rank
PARCC English Performance Levels 4-5MSDE vs. FCPS 2017 Results—Percent of Test Takers
PARCCASSESSMENT
LEVELS 4-5(% of Test Takers)
MSDE FCPS State Rank
Gra
des
3-8
ELA 03 39.8 49.8 6th
ELA 04 41.9 53.5 4th
ELA 05 41.4 55.6 3rd
ELA 06 38.4 48.8 7th
ELA 07 43.1 52.6 8th
ELA 08 38.9 49.0 5th
Hig
h Sc
hool
ELA 10 49.3 64.1 6th
>15% above state
>10‐14.9% above state
<10% above state
Goal 1: Performance on Accountability Tests-ELA State Comparison/Rank
6
PARCC Math Performance Levels 3-5MSDE vs. FCPS 2017 Results—Percent of Test Takers
PARCCASSESSMENT
LEVELS 3-5(% of Test Takers)
MSDE FCPS State Rank
Gra
des
3-8
MATH 03 67.5 80.4 6th
MATH 04 63.1 77.7 5th
MATH 05 62.7 77.7 5th
MATH 06 58.7 73.6 4th
MATH 07 57.9 75.3 5th
MATH 08 38.9 66.3 3rd
ALG 01 60.5 80.3 5th
>15% above state
>10‐14.9% above state
<10% above state
Goal 1: Performance on Accountability Tests-Math State Comparison/Rank
PARCC Math Performance Levels 4-5MSDE vs. FCPS 2017 Results—Percent of Test Takers
PARCCASSESSMENT
LEVELS 4-5(% of Test Takers)
MSDE FCPS State Rank
Gra
des
3-8
MATH 03 43.0 55.4 6th
MATH 04 37.4 49.8 4th
MATH 05 35.5 50.1 3rd
MATH 06 32.2 45.7 4th
MATH 07 25.3 42.7 2nd
MATH 08 16.8 37.2 3rd
ALG 01 36.5 59.6 3rd
>15% above state
>10‐14.9% above state
<10% above state
Goal 1: Performance on Accountability Tests-Math State Comparison/Rank
7
High School English 10: Perf. Levels 3-5
* Data only includes students in attendance at FCPS schools, i.e., excludes students receiving services in non-public settings (LEA24).
Indicates an increase from 2016 to 2017
Goal 1: Performance on Accountability Tests- ELA Student Group Trend
13% Gap
12% Gap
43% Gap
21% Gap
57% Gap
High School Algebra I: Perf. Levels 3-5
* Data only includes students in attendance at FCPS schools, i.e., excludes students receiving services in non-public settings (LEA24).
Indicates an increase from 2016 to 2017
Goal 1: Performance on Accountability Tests- Math Student Group Trend
14% Gap
53% Gap
35% Gap
21% Gap
15% Gap
8
Middle School ELA: Perf. Levels 3-5
* Data only includes students in attendance at FCPS schools, i.e., excludes students receiving services in non-public settings (LEA24).
Indicates an increase from 2016 to 2017
Goal 1: Performance on Accountability Tests- ELA Student Group Trend
15% Gap
13% Gap
67% Gap
23% Gap
54% Gap
Middle School Math w/Alg.1 : Perf. Levels 3-5
* Data only includes students in attendance at FCPS schools, i.e., excludes students receiving services in non-public settings (LEA24).
Indicates an increase from 2016 to 2017
Goal 1: Performance on Accountability Tests- Math Student Group Trend
17% Gap
64% Gap
23% Gap
53% Gap
19% Gap
9
Elementary School ELA: Perf. Levels 3-5
* Data only includes students in attendance at FCPS schools, i.e., excludes students receiving services in non-public settings (LEA24).
Indicates an increase from 2016 to 2017
Goal 1: Performance on Accountability Tests- ELA Student Group Trend
12% Gap
52% Gap
17% Gap
47% Gap
13% Gap
Elementary School Math: Perf. Levels 3-5
* Data only includes students in attendance at FCPS schools, i.e., excludes students receiving services in non-public settings (LEA24).
Indicates an increase from 2016 to 2017
Goal 1: Performance on Accountability Tests- Math Student Group Trend
15% Gap
14% Gap
43% Gap
19% Gap
39% Gap
10
Additional Master Plan Required Reporting: HSA
71.877.1
72.768.6
73.4 70.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Biology Government
Percent of Students Proficient/Advanced
Content
H.S.A. Trends
2015 2016 2017
*Government has not been used in Accountability Reporting
Additional Master Plan Required Reporting: State AssessmentsAssessment Name Purpose Grade Levels
Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC)
*Companion‐The Multi‐State Alternate Assessment (MSAA)
Accountability program that measures the Maryland College and Career‐Ready Standards (MCCRS)*Accountability program for a small percentage of students with alternative learning outcomes
Grades 3‐8 in ELA and MathAlgebra 1English 10*MSAA will be Grade 11 in high school
Maryland Integrated Science Assessment (MISA)
*Companion‐The Alternate Science Assessment
Accountability program that measures Maryland State Science Standards (MSSS)*Accountability program for a small percentage of students with alternative learning outcomes
Grade 5Grade 8Once in High School*Alternate Science Assessment will be Grade 11
11
Additional Master Plan Required Reporting: State AssessmentsAssessment Name Purpose Grade Levels
High School Assessments (Biology and Government)
Accountability program that measures the MarylandState Science or Social Studies Standards (MSSS or MSSSS)
Upon course completion in high school
Kindergarten Readiness Assessment (KRA)
Identifies children’s individual readiness for Kindergarten; supports informed instructional decision making
Random sample of Kindergarten students
Assessing Comprehension and Communication in English State to State (ACCESS) for ELLs
English LanguageProficiency Assessment
Kindergarten through grade 12 (non‐English speaking students)
Additional Master Plan Required Reporting: Local Assessments Elementary (Math)Assessment Name Purpose Grade
LevelsFrequency
Math Interviews & Tasks
Measure progress on the Maryland College and Career‐Ready Standards (MCCRS)
PK‐K Quarterly
Math Assessment Benchmarks
Measure progress on the Maryland College and Career‐Ready Standards (MCCRS)
1‐5 Quarterly or 3X per year in state assessed grades
Math Performance Series
Universal Screener 2 and 5 1X per year
12
Additional Master Plan Required Reporting: Local Assessments Elementary (Reading and Writing)Assessment Name Purpose Grade Levels Frequency
ELA Oral Language Acquisition Inventory (OLAI)
Universal Screeners PK Quarterly
ELA Foundational Skills Assessments and Stages of Writing
Measure progress on the Maryland College and Career‐Ready Standards (MCCRS)
PK Quarterly
ELA Benchmark Assessment System
Measure progress on the Maryland College and Career‐Ready Standards (MCCRS)
K‐2 (3‐5 as identified below)
3X per year
ELA Fluency Assessment Pre‐Assessment to determine BAS Assessment
3‐5 1X per year
ELA Writing (Narrative,Informative, Opinion)
Measure progress on the Maryland College and Career‐Ready Standards (MCCRS)
K‐5 3X per year
Reading Performance Series Universal Screener 2 and 5 1X per year
Additional Master Plan Required Reporting: Local Assessments MiddleAssessment Name Purpose Grade Levels Frequency
Math Benchmark Measure progress on the Maryland College and Career‐Ready Standards (MCCRS)
6‐8 3X per year
ELA Integrated Reading and Writing Tasks (Narrative, LiteraryAnalysis, and Research Simulation)
Measure progress on the Maryland College and Career‐Ready Standards (MCCRS)
6‐8 3X per year
Reading and Math Performance Series
Universal Screener Grade 8 1X per year
Social Studies Performance Task 1 and 2
Measure progress on Maryland State Social Studies Standards (MSSSS)
6‐8 4X per year
Science Performance Task 1‐4
Measure progress on Maryland State Science Standards (MSSS)
6‐8 4X per year
13
Additional Master Plan Required Reporting: Local Assessments HighAssessment Name Purpose Grade Level or
ContentFrequency
Math Benchmark Measure progress on the Maryland College and Career‐Ready Standards (MCCRS)
Algebra I, Algebra 2, Geometry
2X per year per content
ELA Integrated Reading and Writing Tasks (Narrative, LiteraryAnalysis, and Research Simulation)
Measure progress on the Maryland College and Career‐Ready Standards (MCCRS)
Grades 9‐11 English Courses
3X per year (1 of each type each year)
Government Benchmark
Measure progress on the Maryland State Social Studies Standards (MSSSS)
Government 2X per year
Biology Experimental Design and Data Tasks
Measure progress on the Maryland State Science Standards (MSSS)
Biology Throughout semester
ACTS Focus: Accomplishing the Goals in the FCPS Strategic Plan
14
Recommended