View
221
Download
2
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
Different types of asymmetry
FORMS
Force
Technological
Doctrinal
Normative
Moral
Legal Ad bellum In bello
LEVELS
Tactical
Operational
Strategical
In bello asymmetryIAC
Traditional rules of IAC, but often twisted
«Third category » always posed problems.
Now : APIart 44, API art 75. Irak 2003 Israel – Hamas ?
NIAC
The stereotypical situation : state versus non-state
actor is the proto-type asymmetric armed conflict
PARTIES : who are the parties ?
IAC
PARTIES = NATIONS
STATUS = presumed function in relation to the armed conflict
LINK to party through nationality (or direct involvement)
Nationality + function
NIAC
PARTIES = OTHER ENTITIES Non-state State function in relation to armed
conflict
STATUS = the function in relation to the armed conflict
LINK to party through « entity »
”function” + function ?
PARTIES cont. NIACs – two possible solutions :
A) state (all citizens) non-state organizationVery asymmetric, no distinction possible IHL no role or very limited role
”terrorist-paradigm”
B) entities engaged in armed conflictState : armed forces, political leadership, support-
systemNon-state : « armed forces of OAG », political
leadership, chain of supportRecreation of trinitaian structure distinction possible on both sidesICRC guideline on DPH attempts to do this
ICA + NIAC + THIRD WAY ?
Third way = a legal regime constructed to respons do third category. Problem : will inevitably undermine IHL.
Counter – terrorism operations paradigm of law-enforcement
Counter - insurgency operations paradigm of hostilities
Targeted killings ? paradigm of law –enforcement
TENDENCIES OF CONTROVERSY
The Public Committee against Torture in Israel et al. V.The Government of Israel et al., Supreme Court of Israel, 13 December 2006 Targeted killing as a method of counter-insurgency/anti-terrorist operations. COMPROMISE
UAV-drones in counter-terrorist operationsEffectsbased operations ( COIN)
TWO PARADIGMSHOSTILITIES ( IHL)
Weaken military force of organization
Disabling (kill, injure, capture) the greatest number of insurgents
Members of armed forces or OAG. Persons DPH
All lawful means & methods of combat
LAW ENFORCEMENT
Break up riots, unrest,dissolve criminal organizations
Arrest, trial and punishment. Killing only in self-defence or in case of resistance
Rioters, criminals
All lawful exercise of police powers
AIM
HOW
WHO
MEANS
TWO PARADIGMSHOSTILITIES ( IHL)
IHL : distinction Proportionality
between collateral damage and military advantage anticipated (from attack)
no unnecessary suffering or superfluous injury,
lawful means of war
LAW ENFORCEMENT
IHRL : Protect innocent bystanders Proportionality (entire
undertaking)
Graduated use of force ( only force necessary to arrest / disarm)
Lawful means of riot-control ( tear-gas, non-lethal weapons etc)
RULES
Targeted killings case ( HCJ)
Weakening the military force of terrorist organizations
Disabling terrorists = arrest, detention, trial
Use of means the least injurious to terrorists and innocent bystanders
Proportionality between collateral damage and the disablement of terrorists
Means : Targeted killing
Hostilites
Law-enforcement
Law-enforcement
Law-enforcement
Hostilites
STATUSIAC
DEFINITION Definition of combatant
( GC art4, API art 43 Negative definition of
civilian API50(1)
presumption of civilian status ( in the battlefield) API art 50 (1)
presumption of combatant status (upon capture) API art 45(1)
E.G ”protected person” = enemy civilians
NIAC
DEFINITION No definition of
combatant Civilian ? APII art 13 :
« protection of the civilian population »
UNLAWFUL TARGETSIAC
1) Belligerents hors de combat
2) Groups with special protection (medical personnel, red cross, UN – peace keepers)
3) Civilian population and individual civilians shall not be the object of attack. API art 51(2)
Civilians enjoy protection « unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilites » API art 51(3)
CUSTOM
NIAC1) Belligerents hors de combat
2) Groups with special protection (medical personnel, red cross, UN- peace keepers)
3) Civilian population and individual civilians shall not be the object of attack APII art 13 (2)
Civilians enjoy protection « unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilites » APII art 13(3)
CUSTOM
Unlawful targets cont. « Unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilites » APIart 51
(3), APII art 13(3)
when DPH = no protection against direct attack
In practice, DPH defines target –immunity (and the importance of civilian status) in NIACs, since target immunity is defined negatively from DPH
WHEN a person is DPH can be directly targeted no rights to be protected from the effects of hostilites does not count in proportionality test !
WHAT ARE THE REQUIREMENTS FOR DPH ?
Narrow or wide ?
ANALOGY FORM IAC ?
DIRECT PARTICIPATION IN HOSTILITES
IAC
COMBATANTS : Members of armed forces
APIart 43 Militias etc : if CGart 4(2)
or APIart 44 (OAG belongs to party if its
acts are attributable to the State which is party)
Can be targeted at all times
DPH : only loss of target immunity « for such time as » ( art 51 (3)
NIAC Are all belligerents only
targetable « for such time as » they participate in hostilites ? ( NO)
Are only member of the armed forces targetable at all times ? ( NO)
criteria is ” CONTINUOUS COMBAT FUNCTION
Targetable for as long as person retains a continuous combat function
ICRC Guidance on DPH
No codified or customary rule on DPH
ICRC guidance the best point of departure:
Specific act as part of conduct of hostilites
Preparatory acts to the specific acts, deployment to and return from the location of its execution are integral parts of the act
Not unlawful target « for as long as » : API 51(3), APII 13(3)
Two types of DPH : ordinary civilians who DPH (I) members of OAG : (II)
ICRC guidance cont. DPH (I)
For civilians ( other than combatants or person with a continuous combat function): i.e civilians DPH : regain target immunity when DPH is over: APIart 51(3) APII art 13(3
DPH in APIart 51(3) and APII art 13(3) = preparation, hostile act, return from act
3 ELEMENTS OF ACT in order to constitute DPH:
THRESHOLD OF HARM : the act must be likely to adversely affect the military capacity of the adversary or inflict death or destruction on protected persons or objects
DIRECT CAUSATION : causal link between the act and the harm caused
BELLIGERENT NEXUS : act must be designed to cause harm in support of one party to the conflict and to the detriment of another
Civilian DPH regains target immunity when hostile act is carried through and has returned from act ( « for such time as »)
Same DHP in IAC and NIAC - API art 51(3), APII art 13(3)
ICRC Guidance cont. DPH (II)
For members of armed groups : regain target immunity when cease to assume a
continuous combat function DPH = have a continuous combat function
Must be member of organized armed group (OAG) Must have a continuous combat function in relation to armed
conflict
Regain target immunity when have changed function from continuous combat function within group, or when has ended its affiliation with the group
DPH ressembles situation of combatants : armed forces of States and members of organized armed groups with a continuous combat function are put in the same position with resepct to target immunity.
ICRC : added general principle of restraint on the use of force against all lawful targets. ( Lex ferenda for the time being). Only the amount of force necessary.
Sum upAsymmetric armed conflict =>the in bello expression is
NIAC
In NIAC : DPH = core definition to determine who are lawful or unlawful targets, and hence who are « civilians » in the sense of conduct of hostilites ( to whoom rules of distinction, proportionality, precaution in attack applies)
DHP Two types of DPH :
DPH (i) : specific acts carried out by civilians. Target immunity regained once the act is terminated ( NARROW) AND
DHP (ii) : continuous combat function in OAG. Target immunity regained when the function is terminated (WIDE :similar to combatant)
Recommended