Baltimore Washington Corridor Chamber of Commerce

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

Baltimore Washington Corridor Chamber of Commerce. BRAC Presentation. Michael Paone December 14, 2005. Maryland Department of Planning. Military Impact on Maryland’s Economy. $18 billion annually...and growing Approximately100,000 DoD personnel - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

 

 

Baltimore Washington Corridor Chamber of Commerce

BRAC Presentation

Michael Paone

December 14, 2005

Maryland Department of Planning

Military Impact on Maryland’s Economy

●$18 billion annually...and growing●Approximately100,000 DoD personnel●Largest employer in state is NSA, Anne

Arundel County●Significant growth expected: Ft. Meade, Ft.

Detrick, APG, National Naval Medical Center

●Growth will bring high-paying jobs

Major Military Installations in MD

● Andrews AFB● Ft Meade● Army Research Lab, Adelphi● Fort Detrick● Aberdeen Proving Ground● NSWC, Carderock● NSWC, Indian Head ● Patuxent River NAS● US Naval Academy● National Naval Medical Center

Where Are We in the Process?

• Nine-member Commission voted on recommendations Aug 24-27

• President received final report on Sept. 8• President forwarded the report to Congress by

September 23• Congress had 45 legislative days to pass a joint

resolution rejecting the BRAC list; time lapsed without any Congressional action

• Therefore, the BRAC recommendations became law

BRAC 2005: Maryland Fared Well

●Gained upwards of 13,000 DoD civilian and military personnel

●Contractor trail is significant for APG, Meade

●Gaining the most: ●Ft. Meade [5,191]●APG [5,224] ●Bethesda Navy Medical Center [3,500]

Growth at Ft. Meade

DoD Establishes Joint Facilities

●DoD Media and Publications ●DoD Adjudication, Hearings & Appeals ●Joint C4ISR (Development and

Acquisition)

Growth at Bethesda

DOD Establishes Joint Medical Facility●Walter Reed National Military Medical

Center ●Creates a world class Center of Medical

Excellence●Elements of Walter Reed Hospital move to

Bethesda

Growth at APG

DoD Establishes Land C4ISR●Land Command, Control Communication and

Computers Intelligence Surveillance and Reconnaissance (C4ISR)

●Research, Development, Acquisition, Test &Evaluation (RDAT&E)

●Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical Biological Defense

Ongoing Activities

● DLLR & DOL & OED grants

● Seven military alliances: Ft. Meade; Ft. Detrick; Maritime; APG; Andrews AFB; Navy-Pax River; Indian Head continue to work issues at local level

● Maryland Military Installation Strategic Planning Council continues to coordinate state and county interaction with BRAC process

Follow-up Items

●Coordinate infrastructure priorities to accommodate identified needs

●Coordinate additional DOL/DoD Grants

●Ensure appropriate legislation is in place

●Brief various local, state and federal lawmakers

Future Activities

● Regional meetings with state/local/county officials and Ft. Meade & APG base commanders

● Summarize county concerns for state and federal lawmakers, state officials and surrounding communities

● Hire consultants using DOL grant to utilize BRAC emergency grant (coordinate with DLLR and local WIBs)

DBED Office of Military Affairs POCs

● BGen Mike Hayes USMC (Ret.)mhayes@choosemaryland.org 410.767.2988

● Patt Parkerpparker@choosemarlyand.org 443.624.3116

● Catherine Barrett cbarrett@choosemaryland.org 410.767.0684

Consultants: ● Tim Wittig

wittigsall@aol.com 202.841.0655 ● Clark Tyler

ml.ct2@verizon.net 703.893.3336

Demographics:

An Aging Population

Elderly Population as a Percent of the Total Population in Anne Arundel County

10.0% 10.6%12.0%

13.9%15.6%

17.3%

19.2%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Source: U.S. Census 2000 and the Maryland Department of Planning

Elderly Population as a Percent of the Total Population in Howard County

7.5%8.5%

10.3%

12.6%

14.7%

16.9%

19.4%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Source: U.S. Census 2000 and the Maryland Department of Planning

Elderly Population as a Percent of the Total Population in Montgomery County

11.2% 11.6%12.6%

14.5%

16.8%

18.9%20.5%

0%2%

4%6%8%

10%12%14%

16%18%20%

22%

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Source: U.S. Census 2000 and the Maryland Department of Planning

Elderly Population as a Percent of the Total Population in Prince George’s County

7.7%8.6%

9.9%

11.9%

13.9%

15.8%17.6%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Source: U.S. Census 2000 and the Maryland Department of Planning

Elderly Population as a Percent of the Total Population in Corridor Counties

9.4% 10.1%11.3%

13.4%

15.4%

17.4%19.2%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Source: U.S. Census 2000 and the Maryland Department of Planning

Growth in Elderly Corridor Population Over the 2000 to 2030 Time Period

269,300

356,000

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

400,000

< 65 65 and Over

Source: U.S. Census 2000 and the Maryland Department of Planning

Worker Commutation for the Corridor Counties

Net Commutation (In – Out) for the Corridor Counties, 2000

-30,743

-14,999

-34,456

-102,117

-120,000

-100,000

-80,000

-60,000

-40,000

-20,000

0

Ann Arundel Howard Montgomery PrinceGeorge's

Source: U.S. Census Bureau

Commuters Into Anne Arundel from Other Jurisdictions

Commuters From Anne Arundel To Other Jurisdictions

Commuters Into Howard from Other Jurisdictions

Commuters From Howard To Other Jurisdictions

Commuters Into Montgomery from Other Jurisdictions

Commuters From Montgomery To Other Jurisdictions

Commuters Into Prince George’s from Other Jurisdictions

Commuters From Prince George’s To Other Jurisdictions

Cause for Concern

Labor Force vs. Job Growth

Growth in Total Jobs and Labor Force, Anne Arundel County, 2000-2005

41,300

10,500

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

Jobs Labor Force

Source: Maryland Department of Planning

Growth in Jobs and Labor Force,Howard County, 2000-2005

17,000

10,800

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

Jobs Labor Force

Source: Maryland Department of Planning

Growth in Jobs and Labor Force, Montgomery County, 2000-2005

22,90027,450

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

Jobs Labor Force

Source: Maryland Department of Planning

Growth in Jobs and Labor Force,Prince George’s County, 2000-2005

24,600 23,300

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

Jobs Labor Force

Source: Maryland Department of Planning

Growth in Jobs and Labor Force,Corridor Counties, 2000-2005

105,800

72,000

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

Jobs Labor Force

Source: Maryland Department of Planning

Multi-Family Housing

Multi Unit Housing in Corridor CountiesUnits Existing in 2000 and Post 2000 Additions

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

2000-2004 2,852 1,779 9,715 558

2000 31,074 21,664 102,779 103,551

Anne Arundel Howard MontgomeryPrince

George's

Source: U.S. Census 2000 and the Maryland Department of Planning

Multi Units as a Pct of Total Units 2000& Pct Multi Unit Permits Issued, 2000 - 2004

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

2000 16.6% 23.3% 30.7% 34.2% 24.0%

2000-2004 21.5% 21.2% 41.4% 4.0% 15.3%

Anne Arundel

Howard MontPrince

George's Rest of

Maryland

Source: U.S. Census 2000 and the Maryland Department of Planning

Ft. Meade Study Area

Place of Residence Characteristics

Ft. Meade Study Area: Labor Force in 200072,140 persons ages 16 and over

43,862 Employed 1,766 Unemployed5,111 Armed Forces 21,401Not in LF

Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census

Ft. Meade Study Area: Class of Worker in 2000

47

1,677

11,131

31,007

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000

Unpaid familyworkers

Self-employedworkers

Governmentworkers

Private W&Sworkers

Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census

Fort Meade Study Area: Employment by Industry in 2000

73

1,634

1,666

2,061

2,302

2,443

2,616

2,882

3,157

5,497

5,665

6,618

7,248

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000

Ag., forestry, fishing, etc.

Wholesale trade

Information

Other services (ex public adm)

Transp & warehousing, & utilities

Arts, entertainment & other services

Finance, insur, real estate, & rental & leasing

Construction

Manufacturing

Retail trade

Professional, mgmt & other services

Public administration

Education, health, & social services

Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census

Fort Meade Study Area: Occupation in 2000

29

3,597

4,308

5,401

12,547

17,980

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000

Farming, fishing, &forestry

Const, extraction, &maintenance

Prod, transp, & materialmoving

Service occupations

Sales & officeoccupations

Mgmt, profesl, & relatedoccup

Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census

Ft. Meade Study Area: Household Income Distribution, 2000

1,045594

1,811

2,792

4,524

8,225

5,555

4,546

1,026350

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

L.T.$10,000

$10,000-$14,999

$15,000-$24,999

$25,000-$34,999

$35,000-$49,999

$50,000-$74,999

$75,000-$99,999

$100,000-$149,999

$150,000-$199,999

$200,000+

Median HH Income - $63,580

State Rated Capacity and Projected P.S. Enrollment for Ft. Meade Study Area

(2004/2005)6,606

5,948

3,909

2,977

4,012 3,894

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

Elementary Middle High

SRC PE

Source: Anne Arundel County Board of Education

Ft. Meade Study Area

Place of Work Characteristics

Time Arriving to Work in Ft. Meade Study Area: 2000

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

Means of Transportation to Work in Ft. Meade Study Area - 2000

34

63

79

92

316

380

1,206

1,585

8,900

59,269

0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000

Subway or rail

Motorcycle

Taxicab

Bicycle

Other means

Bus or trolley bus

Worked at home

Walked

2-person carpool

Drove alone

Class of Worker in Ft. Meade Study Area, 2000

67

1,490

2,534

2,784

3,588

23,234

38,267

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000

Unpaid family workers

Private not-for-profit workers

Local government workers

State government workers

Self-employed workers

Federal government workers

Private for-profit

Recommended