Base Stations, Antennas and Fibre Everywhere? · PDF fileNetwork and Backhaul Densification ....

Base Stations, Antennas and Fibre Everywhere?

Nicola Marchetti

Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

September 9, 2014

Outline

2

• Massive MIMO • Dense Cell Deployments • Backhauling Mobile Systems with PON

Outline

3

• Massive MIMO • Dense Cell Deployments • Backhauling Mobile Systems with PON

• Massive MIMO: a multiuser system where M >> K

What is massive MIMO and why do we need it?

Base station

MT1

.

.

.

MTK

.

.

.

H11

HKM

1

M

4

• Signal power concentration at the mobile terminal (MT) through pre-coding

What is massive MIMO and why do we need it?

Base station

MT

.

.

.

.

.

.

1

i

M

Scatterer

Scatterer

5

What is massive MIMO and why do we need it?

Normalized field strength in a (𝟏𝟎 × 𝟏𝟎)𝝀 area centered around the receiver to which the beam forming is done. (a) and (b) show the field strength when M=10 and M=100 uniform linear arrays (ULAs) are used with matched filter (MF) precoding to focus the signal to a receiver in the center of the area, [1].

[1] F. Rusek, D. Persson, Buon Kiong Lau, E.G. Larsson, T.L. Marzetta, O. Edfors, F. Tufvesson, "Scaling Up MIMO: Opportunities and Challenges with Very Large Arrays," Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE , vol.30, no.1, pp.40,60, Jan. 2013.

6

• CMT modulation

Cosine Modulated Multitone (CMT)

(a) Spectra of baseband data streams (black) and vestigial side band (VSB) portion of each (other colors). (b) CMT spectrum consisting of modulated versions of the VSB spectra of the baseband data streams. VSB signals are modulated to the subcarrier frequencies f0, f1, · · · , fN−1.

[2] B. Farhang-Boroujeny and C. (George) Yuen, “Cosine modulated and offset qam filter bank multicarrier techniques: a continuous-time prospect,” EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing, 2010, special issue on Filter Banks for Next Generation Multicarrier Wireless Communications, vol. 2010, p. 16 pages, 2010.

7

• VSB modulation and demodulation

Cosine Modulated Multitone (CMT)

8

• The received signal at the base station from the ℓth user

• The received signal from all the users

• Matched Filter (MF) receiver

• MMSE receiver

CMT Application to Massive MIMO

9

CMT Application to Massive MIMO

• Matched filter (MF) receiver

10

CMT Application to Massive MIMO

• MMSE receiver

11

CMT Application to Massive MIMO

• With the assumption of having a flat channel impulse response in each subcarrier band, SINR at the output of the MF and MMSE can be derived as

12

• The channel responses at different received antennas will be averaged out through the MF and MMSE linear combining

Self-equalization

Channel gain across each subcarrier band will be nearly equalized through linear combining

𝑓

13

• Signal enhancement through linear combining leads to the same results for both OFDM and CMT systems. However, CMT offers the following advantages over OFDM:

– More flexible carrier aggregation

– Higher bandwidth efficiency

Comparison with OFDM

14

• Single user case

Numerical Results

(a) and (b) compare the signal to interference ratio (SIR) of the MF linear combining technique for the cases of 32 and 64 subcarriers, respectively, for different number of receive antennas, N.

15

• Single user case

Numerical Results

SINR comparison between MMSE and MF linear combining techniques in the single user case with L = 32, when the user’s SNR at the receiver input is −1 dB for two cases of N = 128 and N = 32.

16

• Multiuser case

Numerical Results

(a) and (b) depict the SINR comparison between MMSE and MF linear combining techniques when we have 6 users and N = 128 receive antennas for two cases of 64 and 32 subcarriers, respectively.

17

Outline

18

• Massive MIMO • Dense Cell Deployments • Backhauling Mobile Systems with PON

19

Network and Backhaul Densification

20

More ASE and Less Power

21

Effect of LOS/NLOS Propagation on ASE and EE of Small-Cells

22

Area Spectral Efficiency

23

Power

24

Energy Efficiency

25

Outline

26

• Massive MIMO • Dense Cell Deployments • Backhauling Mobile Systems with PON

Group Assured Bandwidth for Mobile Base Station Backhauling

27

Bandwidth Types in XG-PON

28

Group Assured Bandwidth

29

•Group assured bandwidth uses the resources assured to the mobile operator more efficiently.

•Group assured bandwidth allows mobile operators to make use of the properties of statistical multiplexing, enabling the same QoS for a smaller amount of assured traffic.

• It does this independently of the rest of the traffic on the PON (possibly competing mobile operators).

•Since this type of bandwidth is valuable, new interesting business models can arise.

Group Transmission Containers in XG-PON

30

• To schedule group assured bandwidth, the OLT must be able to differentiate different groups of connections.

• For that we propose the grouped T-CONT (gT-CONT).

Algorithm Development - gGIANT

• In GIANT [Han2008]: – Each T-CONT has a timer that is decreased every upstream frame.

– Each T-CONT has a byte counter that dictates how much bytes it can transmit.

– If the buffer of T-CONT is not empty when the timer reaches zero, bandwidth is assigned to it.

– When the timer reaches zero the byte counter is refreshed

31

XG-PON Simulator

32

http://sourceforge.net/projects/xgpon4ns3/

Experiment Description

33

• To demonstrate the benefits of group assured bandwidth, we conducted two experiments.

• In both experiments: – PON with 16 ONUs, each ONU with one T-CONT – Each T-CONT with 140 Mbps of individual assured bandwidth – Variable group size – Poisson Traffic

• In one experiment to illustrate more homogenous traffic, the load of all ONUs was increased equally.

• On the other, to illustrate more heterogeneous traffic, the load of one ONU is changed, while the other are kept constant at 120 Mbps.

Average Delay Under Equal & Unequal Loads

34

Lost Packets Under Equal &Unequal Loads

35

Related Publications – 5G in General

• N. Marchetti, “Towards the 5th Generation of Wireless Communication Systems”, ZTE Communications, accepted for publication, to appear

• I. Macaluso, C. Galiotto, N. Marchetti, L. Doyle, “A Complex Systems Science Perspective on Cognitive Networks”, Systems Science and Complexity, Springer (2nd review round)

36

Related Publications – Massive MIMO

• A. Farhang, N. Marchetti, L. Doyle, B. Farhang-Boroujeny, “Filter Bank Multicarrier for Massive MIMO”, IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC), Sep. 2014 (accepted for publication)

• A. Farhang, A. Aminjavaheri, N. Marchetti, L. Doyle, B. Farhang-Boroujeny, "Pilot Decontamination in CMT-based Massive MIMO Networks", International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems (ISWCS), Aug. 2014

• F. Bentosela, N. Marchetti, H. Cornean, “Influence of environment richness on the increase of MIMO capacity with number of antennas”, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 3786-3796, Jul. 2014

• F. Bentosela, H. Cornean, N. Marchetti, “MIMO Capacity for Deterministic Channel Models: Sublinear Growth”, Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, Wiley, vol. 36, no. 1, pgs. 18–27, Jan. 2013

37

Related Publications – Small Cells

• C. Galiotto, I. Gomez-Miguelez, N. Marchetti, L. Doyle, “Effect of LOS/NLOS Propagation on Area Spectral Efficiency and Energy Efficiency of Small Cells”, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM), Dec. 2014 (accepted for publication)

• C. Galiotto, N. Marchetti, L. Doyle, “The Role of the Total Transmit Power on the Linear Area Spectral Efficiency Gain of Cell-Splitting”, IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 2256-2259, Dec. 2013

• C. Galiotto, N. Marchetti, L. Doyle, “Flexible Spectrum Sharing and Interference Coordination for Low Power Nodes in Heterogeneous Networks”, IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC), Sep. 2012

38

Related Publications – Optical/Wireless

• J. Arokkiam, X. Wu, K. Brown, C. Sreenan, P. Alvarez, M. Ruffini, N. Marchetti, L. Doyle, D. Payne, “Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of an XG-PON Module for ns-3”, Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, Elsevier (submitted)

• P. Alvarez, N. Marchetti, D. Payne, M. Ruffini, “Backhauling Mobile Systems with XG-PON Using Grouped Assured Bandwidth”, European Conference on Networks and Optical Communications (NOC), Jun. 2014

• X. Wu, K. Brown, C. Sreenan, P. Alvarez, M. Ruffini, N. Marchetti, D. Payne, L. Doyle, “An XG-PON Module for the NS-3 Network Simulator”, International ICST Conference on Simulation Tools and Techniques (SIMUTools), Mar. 2013

39