View
229
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
1/52
1
Process Management and
Process OrientedImprovement Programs
Chapter 2
Business Process Modeling, Simulation and
Design
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
2/52
2
Overview
Process Management and the Power ofAdopting a Process view
Six Sigma Definitions
!ost and revenue rationale "ramewor#
$e% success factors
Business Process &eengineering 'hat is it(
Brief histor%
'hat processes should )e reengineered, and when(
Suggested framewor#s
*volutionar% vs+ &evolutionar% !hange
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
3/52
Process Management
Principles of managing, controlling and improvingprocesses
'or#flow orientedhow -o)s flow through an organi.ation
/mportant elements in managing processes
Process design
!ontinuous 0incremental improvement
!ontrol s%stems
People management
!hange management
rigins in the field of 3ualit% management
Process control is a fundamental component
4istoricall% strong manufacturing focus
*3uall% valua)le in services
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
4/52
5
The Power of Adopting a Process View
'ea#nesses of the functional org+ and division of la)orparadigm
"ocus on s#ills and resource utili.ation rather than wor# output
&eward s%stems tailored for the functional unit not the overall firm
6roup )ehavior and cultures fostering an 7us versus them8 mentalit%
Decentrali.ation7firms within the firm8 with their own agenda
Strengths of a process view
!reates focus on wor# output reduced ris# for su)9optimi.ation
:eads to transparenc% of how contri)utions of individual wor#ers fit
into the 7)ig picture8 encourages involvement and empowerment 4elps )rea# down )arriers )etween departments
!reates a sense of lo%alt% towards the process to )alance the lo%alties
within the functional units
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
5/52
;
Principles for Successful Process
Management
Assign
process
ownership
Perform
feed)ac#
< control
Develop
!larif% the process scope Determine who will ta#e responsi)ilit% for the process
Process ownership
?eed someone in charge to ma#e things happen
&esponsi)ilities of a process owner Accounta)ilit% and authorit% for process operations and improvements
"acilitate pro)lem solving and ma#e sure corrective action is ta#en
Mediate )etween line managers with overlapping authorities
6uidelines for assigning process ownership Manager with most resources or most wor# invested in the process
Manager that is most affected if the process fails
Process owner must have high enough position to see how the processfits into the 7)ig picture8, needs clout to solve functional )ic#ering
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
7/52@
Phase I: Initialiation
Anal"ing Process #oundaries and Interfaces Process Boundar% defines the process entr% and exit points
where inputs flow in and outputs flow out
Provides a clear picture of the process scope
Defines the external interfaces /nternal interfaces
4and9off points within the process )oundaries
Most critical where the process crosses functional or organi.ational
)orders
Most process inefficiencies are related to insufficient
interface communication 0 lac# of coordination
/mportant to identif% critical interfaces earl% on
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
8/52
The Customer$Producer$Supplier %CPS& model
Cseful approach for resolving interface related pro)lems
Appl%ing the !PS model to all critical interfaces adopt a view ofthe process as a chain of customers !oordination achieved )% understanding internal < external customers
/nvolves negotiation and agreement )etween all parts
Producer
P'OC(SSCustomerSupplier Input Output
Customer Requirements
Producer Requirements
Output Interface
Input Interface
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
9/52
Phase II: !efinition
)-ective>
Cnderstand and document the process wor#flow "acilitate communication and understanding of process operations
!efine the process
Documentation of wor# content in individual activities Csuall% in terms of ver)al descriptions
perating procedures or Standard perating Procedures 0SP
Documentation of process flows Csuall% a flowchart )ased method
!om)ination of ver)al and graphical description !ommon information gathering techni3ues
/nterviews with people wor#ing in the process 0group or individual
Anal%tical o)servation
&eview of relevant documentation
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
10/52
1E
Phase III: Control %I&
)-ective>
*sta)lish a s%stem for controlling the process and providingfeed)ac# to the people involved
(sta)lish Control Points
!ontrol points are activities such as
/nspection, verification, auditing, measuring, countingF Csuall% considered )usiness value adding
'ithout control points and a control s%stem the onl% wa% ofassessing process performance is customer feed)ac# Ghe process ends up in a reactive mode
Poor 3ualit% is discovered too late
:ocation of control points is determined )% !riticalit% impact on customer satisfaction
"easi)ilit% ph%sicall% and economicall% possi)le
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
11/52
11
Phase III: Control %II&
!evelop and Implement Measurements /nvolves answering the 3uestions
1+ 'hat is to )e measured and controlled 0*x+ "ed*x(
2+ 'hat is currentl% measured 0availa)le data(
+ !an a )usiness case )e made for a new measurement s%stem(
5+ 'hat is the appropriate sampling method, sampling si.e and fre3uenc%( Measurements should )e meaningful, accurate and timel%
Statistical and graphical tools needed to turn data into information+
"ive measurement categories> Measures ofF
!onformance 0to given specifications &esponse time 0lead9time, c%cle time
Service levels 0degree of availa)ilit%
&epetition 0fre3uenc% of recurring events such as rewor#
!ost 0Hualit%, PA", internal and external failure costs
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
12/52
12
Phase III: Control %III&
Performing *eed)ac+ and Control
f critical importance for sta)ili.ing and improving the process
)-ectives of controlIcorrective action are
&egulation to maintain a certain performance level
/mprovement aiming at reducing varia)ilit% or raising the average
performance level
"eed)ac# is an important ena)ler for corrective action
People in the process need to understand how their actions affect the
overall process and its performance
"eed)ac# should )e performed in a constructive not punitive manner
!onstructive feed)ac#
Ma#es people feel that the% matter
*ncourages involvement and commitment
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
13/52
1
Si, Sigma -ualit" Programs
Six Sigma is originall% a compan% wide initiative at Motorola
for )rea#through improvement in 3ualit% and productivit%
:aunched in 1@
&endered Motorola the Malcom Baldridge ?ational Hualit% Award 1
Ghe ongoing success of Six Sigma programs has attracted a
growing num)er of prestigious firms to adopt the approach *x+ "ord, 6*, AM*J, 4one%well, ?o#ia, Phillips, Samsung, K+P+
Morgan, Ma%tag, DupontF
Broad definition of Six Sigma programs
A company wide strategic initiative for process improvement in bothmanufacturing and service organizations with the clear obective of
reducing costs and increasing revenues!
"ierce focus on )ottom line results
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
14/52
15
Technical !efinition of Si, Sigma
&educe the variation of ever% individual process to render no more than +5
defects per million opportunities Assuming the process output is normall% distri)uted with mean and
standard deviation the distance )etween the target value and the closestspecification limit is at least = and the process mean is allowed to drift atmost 1+; from the target
Garget Lalue 0G
./01 ./0/0 2/0
Cpper Specification :imit 0CS::ower Specification :imit 0:S:
31 31
2/0$ + 2/0
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
15/52
1;
The Si, Sigma Cost or (fficienc" 'ationale
&educing costs )% increasing process efficienc% has an
immediate effect on the )ottom line
Go assure wor#er involvement Six Sigma strives to avoid la%offs
Commitment Reduced Costs
Increased Profits
Improvement proects
C"cle Time 4ield
VariationGhe Six Sigma
*fficienc% loop
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
16/52
1=
riented around the dimensions of variation, c%cle time 7&eengineering 'or#> DonNt Automate, )literate8, Michael
4ammer,Harvard Business eview, 1E
7Ghe ?ew /ndustrial *ngineering8, Davenport and Short, !loan
Management eview, 1E
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
25/52
2;
#P' Success Stories and *ailures
Success Stories "ord cuts pa%a)le headcount )% @;
Mutual Benefit :ife improves underwriting efficienc% )% 5E
Jerox redesigns its order fulfillment process and improves
service levels )% @;9@ and c%cle times )% @E with
inventor% savings of Q;EE million
Detroit *dison reduces pa%ment c%cles for wor# orders )% E
*ailures An estimated ;E9@E of all reengineering pro-ects have failed Ghose that succeed ta#e a long time to implement and reali.e
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
26/52
2=
:ac# of support from senior management
Poor understanding of the organi.ation and the infrastructure
/na)ilit% to deliver necessar% technolog%
:ac# of guidance, motivation and focus
"i#inga process instead of changingit
?eglecting peopleNs values and )eliefs
'illingness to settle for marginal results
Huitting too earl%
Allowing existing corporate cultures and mgmt attitudes to prevent redesign
?ot assigning enough resources 'or#ing on too man% pro-ects at the same time
Gr%ing to change processes without ma#ing an%one unhapp%
Pulling )ac# when people resist change
*tcF
'easons for #P' *ailures
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
27/52
2@
6hat does it ta+e to succeed with #P'7
4ammer and !hamp% 7Ghe role of senior management is crucial+8
*mpirical research indicatesF
organi.ations which displa% understanding, commitment
and strong executive leadership are more li#el% to succeed
with process reengineering pro-ects+
!ommon themes in successful reengineering efforts
1+ "irms use BP& to grow )usiness rather than retrench
2+ "irms emphasi.e serving customers < compete
aggressivel% with 3uantit% < 3ualit% of products < services+ "irms emphasi.e getting more customers, more wor# and
more revenues instead of downsi.ing
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
28/52
2
'eengineering and its 'elationships to
Other Improvement Programs %I&
&eengineering 9 what is that(
7Ghe fundamental rethin#ing and radical redesign of )usiness
processes to achieve dramatic improvements in critical,
contemporar% measures of performance such as cost, 3ualit%,
service and speed8 04ammer and !hamp% 1
A num)er of similar definitions )% other authors also exist
&eengineering characteristics "ocus on core competencies or value adding )usiness processes Ghe goal is to achieve dramatic improvement through rapid and
radical redesign and implementation Pro8ects that "ield onl" marginal improvement and drag out
over time are failures from a reengineering perspective
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
29/52
2
'eengineering and its 'elationships to
Other Improvement Programs %II&
Rightsizing Restructuring Automation TQM Reengineering
Assumptions Staffing Reporting Technology Customer Fundamentalquestioned relationships applications needs
Focus of Staffing, job Organization Systems Bottom-up Radicalchange responsibilities improvements changes
Orientation Functional Functional Procedures Processes Processes
Role of IT Often blamed Occasionally To speed up Incidental Keyemphasized existing systems
Improvement Usually Usually Incremental Incremental Dramatic andgoals incremental incremental significant
Frequency Usually one Usually Periodic Continuous Usually onetime one time time
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
30/52
E
'elationship )etween !iscontinuous
%'adical& and Continuous Improvement
Improvem
ent
Time
IncrementalImprovement
RadicalImprovement
TheoreticalCapability
StatisticalProcessControl
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
31/52
1
#rief 9istor" of #P' %I&
Most agree that Michael 4ammer laid the foundation to the
reengineering approachF
FBut man% factors influenced the )irth and h%pe around BP&
Ghe origins can )e traced )ac# to a num)er of successful pro-ects
underta#en )% management consulting firms li#e Mc$inse% in the ENs
GHM had )rought the notion of process improvement onto the
management agenda
Ghe recession and glo)ali.ation in late 1ENs and earl% 1ENs
stimulated companies to see# new wa%s to improve )usiness
performance
Programs often aimed at increasing flexi)ilit% and
responsiveness
Middle management under particular pressure
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
32/52
2
#rief 9istor" of #P' %II&
Articles and )oo#s )% 4ammer, Davenport, Short, !hamp%
etc+ legitimi.ed and defined the reengineering approach
*arl% success stories were heavil% pu)lished in the popular press
Man% consultantsIvendors launched their own versions of BP& All t%pes of change programs were la)eled reengineering
6ave BP& a )ad name
#ut man" factors influenced the )irth and h"pe around #P'
Ghe Productivit% Paradox 0Stephen &oach Despite powerful mar#et and service innovations related to /G and
increased computer power in the 1ENs there was little evidence that
/G investments improved overall productivit%
rgani.ations were not a)le to utili.e the capa)ilities of the newtechnolog% Automating inefficient processes has limited impact on
productivit%
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
33/52
Ghree forces are driving companies towards redesign0Ghe three !Ns, 4ammer < !hamp%, 1 Customers
are )ecoming increasingl% more demanding
Competition has intensified and is harder to predict
Change
in technolog%
constant pressure to improveO design new products faster
flexi)ilit% and a)ilit% to change fast are re3uirements for
survival
6hen Should a Process )e 'eengineered7 %I&
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
34/52
5
Cseful 3uestions to as# 0!ross et al+ 015 Are customers demanding more for less(
Are %our competitors providing more for less(
!an %ou hand9carr% a -o) through the process much faster than
the normal c%cle time 0ex five times faster(
4ave %our incremental improvement efforts )een stalled(
4ave technolog% investments )een a disappointment(
Are %ou planning to introduce radicall% new productsIservices
or to serve new mar#ets(
Are %ou in danger of )ecoming unprofita)le( 4ave cost9cutting programs failed to turn the ship around(
Are operations )eing merged or consolidated(
Are the core )usiness processes fragmented(
6hen Should a Process )e 'eengineered7 %II&
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
35/52
;
Processes 0not organi.ations are reengineered
!onfusion arises )ecause organi.ational units are well defined,
processes are often not+
"ormal processes are prime candidates for reengineering
"ormal processes are guided )% written policiesO informal
processes are not+
G%picall% involve several departments and man% emplo%ees+
More li#el% rigid and therefore more li#el% to )e )ased on
invalid assumptions+
6hat Should )e 'eengineered7 %I&
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
36/52
=
Screening criteria
1+ D%sfunction
'hich processes are in deepest trou)le
0most )ro#en or inefficient(2+ /mportance
'hich processes have the greatest
impact on the compan%Ns customers(
+ "easi)ilit% 'hich processes are currentl% mostli#el% to )e successfull% reengineered(
6hat Should )e 'eengineered7 %II&
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
37/52
@
S"mptoms and diseases of )ro+en processes
!"sfunctional or #ro+en Processes
Symptom Disease
1 Extensive information Arbitrary fragmentationexchange, data redundancy of a natural process
and re-keying2 Inventory, buffers and System slack to cope with
other assets uncertainty
3 High ratio of checking and Fragmentationcontrol to value-adding
4 Rework and (re)iteration Inadequate feedback alongchains
5 Complexity, exceptions Accretion onto a simple baseand special cases
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
38/52
Assessed )% determining issues the customers feelstrongl% a)out and identif%ing which processes most
influence these issues
Importance
Customer Issues
Product CostOn-time DeliveryProduct Features
After-sales service
Market
Processes
Product DesignOrder ProcessingProcurementCRM
Company
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
39/52
Determined )%> Process Scope, Pro-ect !ost, wner!ommitment and the Strength of the &edesign Geam
:arger pro-ects offer potentiall% higher pa%offs )ut lesser
li#elihood of success
*easi)ilit"
Process
Feasibility
Process Scope Project Cost
Team StrengthOwner/Corp.Commitment
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
40/52
5E
Ghe process paradox refers to the decline and failure of)usinesses that have achieved dramatic improvements
through process reengineering
Go avoid getting caught in the process paradoxcompanies must
;
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
41/52
51
Suggested *ramewor+ for #P' %I&
/n general, #e%words for successful BP& are creativit% andinnovationF
F)ut BP& pro-ects also need structure and discipline,prefera)l% achieved )% following a well thought9outapproach+
#P' *ramewor+ due to 'o)erts %>>.& Starts with a gap anal%sis and ends with a transition to
continuous improvement+
Ghe gap anal%sis focuses on three 3uestions>/ The wa" things should )e
2/ The wa" things are
?/ 9ow to reconcile the gap )etween and 2
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
42/52
52
'o)ert@s *ramewor+ for #P'
Opportunityassessment
Current capabilityanalysis
Process Design
Risk and impactassessment
Transition plan
Pilot test
Infrastructuremodifications
Implementationand transition
Tracking andperformance
Continuous improvementprocess
S d * + f #P' %II&
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
43/52
5
#P' *ramewor+ due to owenthal %>>.& !onsists of 5 phases
/ Preparing for change ?/ !esigning for change
2/ Planning for change ./ (valuating change
Phase 1 6oals
Building management understanding, awareness and support for change Preparing for a cultural shift and ac3uire emplo%ee 7)u%9in8
Phase 2 Assumption rgani.ations need to adopt to constantl% changing mar#etplaces
Phase 9 Method Go identif%, assess, map and design A framewor# for translating process #nowledge into leaps of change
Phase 5 Means *valuate performance during a specified time frame
Suggested *ramewor+ for #P' %II&
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
44/52
55
owenthal@s *ramewor+ for #P'
Preparing for
change
Planning for
change
!esigning
change
(valuating
change
Phase I Phase II
Phase III
Phase IV
S t d * + f #P' %III&
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
45/52
5;
#P' *ramewor+ due to CrossB *eather5"nch %>>.&
/ Anal"sis /n depth understanding of mar#et and customer re3uirements
Detailed understanding of how things are currentl% done
'here are the strengths and wea#nesses compared to the competition
2/ !esign Based on principles that fall into six categories
& Service -ualit" relates to customer contacts
2& 6or+flow managing the flow of 8o)s
?& 6or+space ergonomic factors and la"out options
.& Continuous improvement self sustaining
0& 6or+force people are integral to )usiness processes
3& Information technolog"
?/ Implementation
Gransforming the design into da% to da% operations
Suggested *ramewor+ for #P' %III&
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
46/52
5=
Cross et al@s *ramewor+ for #P'
CustomerRequirement analysis
Designspecifications
High-level design
Detailed design
Pilot newdesign
Transform the business
Baselineanalysis
Currentprocess review
Design options
Model/validate
new design
Build in CI
feedback
Designprinciples
AnalysisPhase
DesignPhase
ImplementationPhase
' l ti ( l ti Ch
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
47/52
5@
Ghe reengineering movement advocates radical redesignand rapid revolutionar% implementation and change
A revolutionar% change tactic Gurns the whole organi.ation on its head
4as potential to achieve order of magnitude improvements
/s ver% costl% 4as a high ris# of failure
Go reduce ris#s and costs of implementation man%companies end up with a strateg% of radical redesign andevolutionar% implementation tactic
/mplementing the feasi)le plans given current restrictions
Implemented process is usually a compromise between theoriginal process and the ideal! blueprinted process design
'evolutionar" vs/ (volutionar" Change
' l ti ( l ti Ch
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
48/52
5
Ghe critical element in choosing )etween a revolutionar%and evolutionar% approach is time
/f the firm is in a reactive mode responding to a crisis a
revolutionar% approach ma% )e the onl% option
/f in a proactive mode an evolutionar% tactic might wor#
'evolutionar" vs/ (volutionar" Change
(lement (volutionar" change model 'evolutionar" change model
:eadership /nsiders utsiders
utside resources "ew, if an%, consultants !onsultant led initiative
Ph%sical separation ?o, part time team mem)ers es, 7off9campus site8
!risis ?one Poor performance
Milestones "lexi)le "irm
&eward s%stem Cnchanged ?ew
/GIprocess change Process first Simultaneous process and /G change
*lements of evolutionar% and revolutionar% change theories
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
49/52
5
Basic principle People directl% affected )% or involved in a change process must
ta#e active part in the design and implementation of that change
&eal change is achieved through incremental improvement over
time
!hange should come from within the current organi.ation
Should )e carried out )% current emplo%ees and leadership
Should )e adapted to existing resources and capa)ilities flexi)le
milestones
Should )e )ased on open and )road communication ?ew processes and procedures are implemented )efore
introducing new /G s%stems
The (volutionar" Change Model %I&
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
50/52
;E
Advantages of an evolutionar% change tactic compared to arevolutionar% approach :ess disruptive and ris#%
/ncreases the organi.ationRs a)ilit% to change
Disadvantages Ga#es a long time to see results
Does not offer the same potential for order of magnitudeimprovements
Lision must )e #ept alive and ad-usted over time as external mar#etconditions change
The (volutionar" Change Model %II&
Th ' l ti Ch M d l %I&
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
51/52
;1
Based on the punctuated e3uili)rium paradigm &adical change occurring at certain instances
:ong periods of incremental change in )etween
&evolutionar% change 4appens 3uic#l%
Alters the ver% foundation of the )usiness and its culture Brings disorder, uncertaint%, and identit% crises
?eeds to )e top driven
&e3uires external resources and new perspectives
/nvolves tough decisions, cost cutting and conflict resolution
Ghe change team is small and isolated from the rest of theorgani.ation Avoid undue influence from current operations
!ommunication with people in the process is on a 7need to #now8 )asis
The 'evolutionar" Change Model %I&
The 'e ol tionar Change Model %II&
7/23/2019 BPRA Laguna Chapter 2
52/52
Advantages with a revolutionar% implementation approach Drastic results can )e achieved 3uic#l% /f successful, the ideal 7)lueprinted8 design is put in place
Disadvantages with a revolutionar% change tactic
Ler% strenuous for the organi.ation
4igh pro)a)ilit% for failure
Diverts top management attention from the external mar#etplace
6oes against core values of man% organi.ations
*mpowerment
Bottom9up involvement /nnovation
Secrec% creates uncertaint% a)out the future roles of individual
emplo%eesresistance to change
The 'evolutionar" Change Model %II&
Recommended