View
220
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
1/193
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
2/193
This page intentionally left blank
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
3/193
M an y i nt er pr et er s o f t he F ou rt h G os pe l d et ec t a ll us io ns t o b ib li ca l
t ex ts a bo ut m ar ri ag e, b ut n on e o ff er s a c om pr eh en si ve a na ly si s o f
t he se p ro po se d a ll us i on s o r a c on vi nc in g e xp la na ti on f or t he ir p re s-
e n c e . B u i l d i n g o n t h e w o r k o f R i c h a r d H a y s a n d D o n a l d J u e l , J o c e l y n
M c W h i r t e r a r g u e s t h a t J o h n a l l u d e s t o b i b l i c a l t e x t s a b o u t m a r r i a g e i n
orde r to develop a meta phor for Jes us and how he re lates to his
f ol lo we rs . T he se t ex ts s ee m t o h av e b ee n i nt er pr et ed a s m es si an ic
p ro ph ec ie s, a nd a pp li ed b y J oh n t o e ve nt s i n J es us ’ l if e a nd d ea th .
M cW h ir te r s ho ws h ow v er ba l p ar al le ls l in k J oh n’ s e vo ke d m ar ri ag e
t e x t s t o P s a l m 4 5 a b o u t G o d ’ s a n o i n t e d k i n g . M e s s i a n i c i n t e r p r e t a t i o nof these texts allows John to use them in portraying Jesus as a
b ri de gr oo m- Me ss ia h a nd d ep ic ti ng J es us ’ r el at io ns hi p w it h h is
f o ll o we r s i n t e rm s o f m a rr i ag e .
J O C E L Y N M C W H I R T E R i s a n A ss i st an t P ro fe s so r o f R e li gi ou s S tu d-
i es a t A lb io n C ol le ge i n A lb io n, M ic h ig an . T hi s i s h er f ir st b oo k.
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
4/193
S O C I E T Y F O R N E W T E S T A M E N T S T U D I E S
M O N O G R A P H S E R I E S
Recent titles in the series
1 20 . B el ly a nd B od y i n t he P au li ne E pi st le s
K A R L O L A V S A N D N E S
0 5 2 1 8 1 5 3 5 5
1 21 . T he F ir st C hr is ti an H is to ri an
D A N I E L M A R G U E R A T
0 5 2 1 8 1 6 5 0 51 22 . A n A r am ai c A pp ro ac h t o Q
M A U R I C E C A S E Y
0 5 2 1 8 1 7 2 3 4
1 23 . I sa ia h’ s C hr is t i n M at th ew ’s G o sp el
R I C H A R D B E A T O N
0 5 2 1 8 1 8 8 8 5
1 24 . G od a nd H is to ry i n t he B oo k o f R ev el at io n
M I C H A E L G I L B E R S T O N
0 5 2 1 8 2 4 6 6 41 25 . J es us ’ D e fe at o f D e at h
P E T E R G . B O L T
0 5 2 1 8 3 0 3 6 2
1 26 . F ro m H op e t o D es pa ir i n T h e ss al on ic a
C O L I N R . N I C H O L L
0 5 2 1 8 3 1 4 2 3
1 27 . M at th ew ’s T ri lo gy o f P ar ab le s
W E S L E Y G . O L M S T E A D
0 5 2 1 8 3 1 5 4 71 28 . T he P eo pl e o f G od i n t h e A p oc al yp se
S T E P H E N P A T T E M O R E
0 5 2 1 8 3 6 9 8 0
1 29 . T he E xo rc is m S to ri es i n L uk e– Ac ts
T O D D K L U T Z
0 5 2 1 8 3 8 0 4 5
1 3 0. J e ws , G e nt i le s a n d E t hn i c R e c on c il i at io n
T E T - L I M N . Y E E
0 5 2 1 8 3 8 3 1 2
1 31 . A n ci en t R he to ri c a nd P au l’ s A po lo gy
F R E D R I C K J . L O N G
0 5 2 1 8 4 2 3 3 6
1 3 2. R e co n st r uc ti n g H o n or i n R o m a n P h i li p pi
J O S E P H H . H E L L E R M A N
0 5 2 1 8 4 9 0 9 8
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
5/193
1 3 3. T h eo l og i ca l H e rm e ne u ti c s a n d I T h es s al o ni a ns
A N G U S P A D D I S O N
0 5 2 1 8 4 9 8 3 7
1 34 . G re co -R om an C ul tu re a nd t he G al il ee o f J es us
M A R K A . C H A N C E Y
0 5 2 1 8 4 6 4 7 1
1 35 . C hr is to lo gy a nd D is ci pl es hi p i n t he G os pe l o f M ar k
S U Z A N N E W A T T S W E N D E R S
0 5 2 1 8 5 9 0 6 9
1 36 . T he J ud ae an P oo r a n d t h e F o u rt h G o sp el
T I M O T H Y J . M . L I N G
0 5 2 1 8 5 7 2 2 8
1 37 . P au l, t he S to ic s, a nd t he B od y o f C hr is t
M I C H E L L E L E E
0 5 2 1 8 6 4 5 4 2
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
6/193
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
7/193
T he B rid eg ro om M es si ah a ndt h e P e o p l e o f G o d
M ar ri ag e i n t he F ou rt h G os pe l
J O C E L Y N M C W H I R T E R
Albion College
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
8/193
CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS
Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo
Cambridge University PressThe Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK
First published in print format
ISBN-13 978-0-521-86425-1
ISBN-13 978-0-511-34889-1
© Jocelyn McWhirter 2006
2006
Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521864251
This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provision ofrelevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place
without the written permission of Cambridge University Press.
ISBN-10 0-511-34889-4
ISBN-10 0-521-86425-9
Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of urlsfor external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication, and does not
guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.
Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York
www.cambridge.org
hardback
eBook (EBL)
eBook (EBL)
hardback
http://www.cambridge.org/9780521864251http://www.cambridge.org/http://www.cambridge.org/9780521864251http://www.cambridge.org/
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
9/193
F or J am ie a nd T ed dy
te * k n a y eou Ð
a nd i n m em or y o f D on al d J ue l
maka * rio i oi mZ i do * n te B k ai p is te u * santeB
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
10/193
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
11/193
C O N T E N T S
Acknowledgments page xi
List of abbreviations xii
1 A llu s ion s t o b iblic al t e xt s ab ou t m arr iag e 1A t um ul t o f r ev er be ra ti on s 4
Ma ki ng s en se o f th e e ch oe s 10
2 E c h oes of S c r ip tu r e , r e p re s e n t ative f igu r es , an d
m e s s ianic e xe ge sis 21E ch oe s o f S cr ip tu re i n t he F ou rt h G os pe l 21
G u i d e li n e s f o r i d e n t i fy i n g a n d i n t e r pr e t i n g a l l usi o n s 23
R ep re se n ta ti ve f ig ur es i n t he F ou rt h G os pe l 31
M es si an ic e xe ge si s i n t he F ou rt h G os pe l 36
I d en t if y in g a n d i n t er p re t in g J o hn ’ s a l l us i o ns 44
3 T he r ev el at i o n o f t he b ri de g ro om -M es si a h: a l lu si on s
t o J er em i ah 3 3: 10 – 11 a nd G en es i s 2 9 :1 – 20 46“ T he b r id e gr o om ’ s v o i c e” 50
T he J oh an ni ne J es us a t J ac ob ’s w e ll 58
E xc ur su s : t he J oh an ni ne J es u s i n I sr ae l’ s wi ld er ne s s 76
4 T he g lo r if ic at io n o f t he b ri de gr oo m- M es s ia h:
allu s ions t o S on g 1: 12 an d S on g 3: 1–4 79The king on the couch 80
R ec og ni z in g t he r is e n L or d 88
5 T he b ri de gr oo m - Me ss ia h o f P sa lm 4 5 i n t he S o n g o f
S o ng s , J e r em i a h 3 3 :1 0 – 1 1 , a n d G e ne s i s 2 9 : 1 –2 0 106Ps alm 45 as a me ssianic psalm 107
Psalm 45 in the Fourth Gospel 110
T he b el ov ed ki ng a nd h is be au ti fu l b ri de 111
A j oy fu l w ed di ng p ro ce ss io n 115
ix
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
12/193
I sr ae l’ s fo rb e ar s at a w e ll o f li vi ng w at er 117
E xc ur su s : m or e e vi de nc e f ro m t he F ou rt h G os pe l f or
m es s ia ni c e xe g es is b as ed o n P sa lm 4 5 120
6 H e a r i ng t h e e c ho e s 123H ea ri ng t he e ch oe s i n t he fi rs t c en tu ry 124
H ea ri ng t he e ch oe s i n t he t we nt y- fi rs t c en tu ry 134
7 Conclusion 144
Bibliography 148
S c ri p t ur e i n de x 162 Index of ancient commentators 171
Index of modern commentators 172
x Contents
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
13/193
A C K N O W L E D G M E N T S
T hi s m on og ra ph i s a r ev is io n o f m y d oc to ra l d is se rt at io n, s ub mi tt ed
t o P ri nce to n T heo lo gi ca l S em in ar y i n 2 00 1. I t h as b een t ho ro ug hl y
u pd at ed t o r ef le ct d ev el op m en ts i n s ch ol ar s hi p s i nc e t he n.
M a n y o t h e r s h a v e p l a y e d a n i n s t r u m e n t a l r o l e i n i t s p r o d u c t i o n . I o w e
t ha nk s f ir st t o m y t ea ch er s. R od W hi t ac re a t T ri n it y E pi s co pa l S ch oo l
f or M in is tr y g ot m e i nt er es te d i n t he F ou rt h G os pe l. M y d is se rt at io n
d i r e c t o r , t h e l a t e D o n a l d J u e l , i n t r o d u c e d m e t o t h e c o n c e p t o f m e s s i a n i c
e xe ge si s , p at i en t ly r ev i ew ed m os t o f t hi s d oc um en t ’s m an y v er si o ns ,
a nd c on si st en tl y s te er ed m e i n t he r ig ht d ir ec ti on . B ev er ly G av en taad ded h el pf ul c omm en ts t o an ea rl y a tt em pt . C om mi tt ee me mb er s
J am es C ha rl es wo rt h a nd R os s W ag ne r c ar ef ul ly r ea d t he f in al d ra ft s
a n d o f fe r ed c r uc i al i n si g h ts .
Ad di ti on al t ha nk s a re d ue t o s ev er al o f m y c ol lea gu es . M y f ri en d
E li sab et h J oh ns on o ff er ed a t ho ug ht fu l r es po ns e t o t he f ir st d ra ft o f
Chapter 3. J oh n M il ler s ha red i nfo rm at io n a bo ut t he T es t am en t o f
Judah. A la n I se r, m y c ol l ea g ue a t S ai n t J os ep h ’s U ni v er s it y, a ns we r ed
m y q ue st io ns a bo ut J ew is h e xe ge ti ca l t ra di ti on s a nd c on te mp or ar yp ra xi s. I m us t a ls o a ck no wl ed ge m y f el lo w r es id en ts C ha rl en e M os s,
M ic ha el D ai se , B il l C am pb el l , L id i ja N ov ak o vi c, a nd R aq ue l S t. C la ir ,
w ho se c on tr ib ut io ns t o m y i nt el le ct ua l d ev el op me nt a nd e mo ti on al
s t ab i l it y c a nn o t b e m e as u re d .
My friends and family membe rs have been a constant sou rce o f
s up po rt a nd e nc ou ra ge me nt s in ce t hi s p ro je ct b eg an . I a m e sp ec ia ll y
g r a t e f u l t o m y c h i l d r e n J a m i e a n d T e d d y , w h o p u t u p w i t h m e a s I m a d e
t h e f i na l r e vi s i on s .
xi
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
14/193
A B B R E V I A T I O N S
1Q28b R ul e o f t he B le ss in gs
2 Bar 2 Baruch
4 Kgdms 4 Ki ngdoms
4QCanta–c 4QCanticlesa–c
4QComm-
Cant
C o mm e nt a r y o n C a nt i cl e s
4QFlor Florilegium
4QpIsaa Isaiah Pesher a
6QCant 6QCanticles11QPsa Psalms Scrolla
AB Anchor Bible
’ Abot
R. Nat.
’ Ab ot R . N at h an
ACW Ancien t Christian Writers
An Bib Analec ta biblica
Ant. Jewish Antiquities (Josephus)
AOAT Alter Orient und Altes Testam entBar Baruch
BDAG Bauer, W., F. W. Dan ker, W. F. Arnd t, an d
F . W . G i ng ri c h. G r ee k– E ng l is h L ex ic on o f t h e
New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature
3 rd e dn . C hi ca go , 1 99 9
BDF Blass, F., A. Deb ru nne r, an d R. W. Fu nk.
A Greek Grammar of the New Testament and
O t he r E a r ly C h r is t i an L i te r at u re
C h ic a g o, 1 9 61
BETL Bibli othec a ephemer idum theo log icarum l ova niensiu m
BFCT Beiträg e z u r F ö r d er u ng c h ri s t li c he r T h eo l o gi e
BGBE Beiträg e z ur G es c hi ch t e d er b ib l is c he n E xe ge s e
BHS Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia . E di te d b y K ar l E ll in ge r
a nd W il h el m R ud ol p h. S tu t tg ar t, 1 9 83
xii
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
15/193
Bib Biblica
BJRL Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of
Manchester
BJS Bro wn Judaic StudiesBNTC Black ’s New Testament Commentaries
BSac Bibliotheca sacra
BTB Biblical Theology Bulletin
BVC Bible et vie chrétienne
BZ Biblische Zeitschrift
BZNW Beihe fte zur Zeitsch rift f ür d i e n e ut e st a m en t l ic h e
Wissenschaft
CB Cultura biblica
CBET Contr ib utio ns to Biblica l Exegesis and Th eol ogy
CBQ Catholic B iblical Quar terly
CGTSC Cambrid ge Greek Testament for School s and Co ll eges
Comm.
Cant.
C o mm e nt a r i us i n C a nt i c um (Origen)
Co nBN T C on ie ct an ea b ib li ca: N ew T es ta men t S er ie s
CRINT Comp endia rerum iuda icaru m ad Novu mTestamentum
Dial. Dialogue with Trypho (Justin)
DRev Downside Review
Ebib Etudes bibliques
EgT Eglise et Thé ologie
EvJ Evangelical Journal
EvT Evangelische Theologie
FC Fathers o f the ChurchGCS Die griechische christ liche Sch rift steller der ersten d rei
Jahrhunderte
HBT Horizons in Biblical Theology
HeyJ Heythrop Journal
HNT Handbuch zum Neuen Testam ent
Hom. Cant. Homiliae in Canticum (Origen)
Hom. Gen. Homiliae in Genesim (Origen)
HTS Harv ar d Theolog ical Studi es
HUCM Monogr aphs of the Heb rew Un io n Co llege
ICC Interna tional Critical Co mm en tary
Int Interpretation
ITQ Irish Theological Quarterly
JBL Journal of Biblical Literature
JSNT Journal for the Study of the New Testament
List of abbreviations xiii
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
16/193
J SN TS up J ou rn al fo r t he St ud y o f t he Ne w T es ta men t: Su pp le men t
Series
JSOT Journal for the Study of the Old Testament
JTS Journal of Theological StudiesLXX Septu ag int
MT Maso retic Text
m. Yad. Mishnah Yadayim
NA27 Novum Testamentum Graece, N e st l e- A l an d ,
2 7t h e dn .
NCB New Ce ntury Bible
NeoT Neotestamentica
NICNT New Int ernatio nal Commentary on the New Test ament
NIV New Int ernatio nal Versio n
NovT N o v u m T e s tam e n tu m
No vT Su p N ov um T es tam en tu m S up pl em en ts
NPNF1 Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers , S er ie s 1
NRSV New Re vised Standard Versi on
NT New T estament
NTS New Testament StudiesOdes Sol. Odes of Solomon
OTP Old Testamen t Pseudepigr apha. E di te d b y
J . H . C ha rl es wo rt h. 2 v ol s. N ew Y or k, 1 98 3
PL Patrolo gia latina. Ed ited by J .-P. Mig ne. 217 vols . Pari s,
1 8 4 4 – 6 4
Pss. Sol. Psalms of Solomon
PTMS Pittsb urgh Theolo gical Mon ogr aph Seri es
RB Revue biblique RSR Recherches de science religieuse
RSV Revis ed Stand ard Versio n
RThom Revue Thomiste
RUO Revue de l’université d’Ottawa
SBLDS Soci et y of Bib lica l Li teratur e Disse rtatio n Seri es
S BL Sy mS S oc ie ty o f Bi bl ic al L it er at ur e Sy mp os iu m S er ie s
ScrHier Scripta hierosol ymitana
SJLA Studies in Judaism in Late Antiq uity
SJT Scottish Journal of Theol ogy
SNT Studien zum Neuen Testament
SN TS MS S oci et y fo r N ew T es ta men t St ud ies M on og rap h Se ri es
SP Sacra pagina
ST Studia Theologic a
StABH Studi es i n Ameri ca n Bibl ical Hermeneuti cs
xiv List of abbreviations
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
17/193
TBT The Bible Today
TDNT Theological Dictiona ry of the New Testament . E d i t e d b y
G . K it te l a nd G . F ri ed ri ch . T ra ns la te d b y G . W .
B ro m il ey . 1 0 v ol s. G ra nd R ap id s, 1 9 64 – 76ThTo Theology Today
T. Jud. Tes tame nt of Judah
T. Lev. Tes tame nt of Levi
TNTC Ty ndal e New Testamen t Commentaries
T r ac t . E v .
Jo.
In Evangelium Johannis tractatus
TS Theological Studies
TSAJ Texte und Stu dien zum antiken Jud entum
t. Sanh. Tosefta Sanhedrin
VTSup Vetus Test amentu m Sup pleme nts
WUNT Wis sens ch aftl ic he Un tersu chun gen zum Neu en
Testament
ZAW Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft
ZNW Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und
d i e K u nd e d e r ä l t er e n K i rc h e
List of abbreviations xv
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
18/193
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
19/193
1
A L L U S I O N S T O B I B L I C A L T E X T SA B O U T M A R R I A G E
“Y ou s ee t ha t ev er yw he re t he my st er ies a re i n ag re eme nt ,” w ri te s
O ri ge n o f A le xa nd ri a ( ca . 1 85 –c a. 2 53 ). “ Yo u s ee t he p at te rn s o f t he
N ew a nd O ld T es ta me nt t o b e h ar mo ni ou s. ”1 O ri ge n’ s b el ie f i n t he
theol ogica l uni ty o f th e Bi bl e leads him to reco gnize all kin ds o f
parall el s betwee n passages i n the New Test ament and port ion s of
I s ra e l’ s S c ri p t ur e s. A m o ng t h es e a r e s i mi l ar i ti e s b e tw e e n t w o o f J o h n’ s
s to ri es a nd ce rt ai n b ib li ca l t ex ts t ha t i nv ol ve ma rri ag e. I n h is Com-
m en ta ry o n J oh n, f or e xa mp le , h e c om pa re s t he S am ar it an w om an o f
J oh n 4 :4 – 4 2 w it h Re be kah i n G en . 2 4: 1– 6 7. J us t a s R eb ek ah m ee tsA br ah am ’s s er va nt a t a w el l, s o t he S am ar it an w om an m ee ts J es us a t a
w el l . O ri ge n n o te s o n e i m po rt an t d i ff er en ce : w he r ea s R eb ek ah g i ve s
Abraham’ s servant a dri nk from h er water jar and do es not l eave it
b e h i n d ( G e n . 2 4 : 1 8 ) , t h e S a m a r i t a n w o m a n a c c e p t s t h e w a t e r o f e t e r n a l
l if e f ro m J es us a nd fo rs ak es h er o wn j ar – t ha t i s, h er fo rm er o pi ni on s
( Jo hn 4 : 28 ).2 In his G e ne si s H om il y, Origen g oes on to extend the
c o n n e c t i o n t o t w o o t h e r b i b l i c a l s c e n e s : t h e s t o r i e s o f J a c o b a n d R a c h e l
in Gen. 29:1– 20 and of Mos es an d Zi pporah i n Exod. 2: 15–22. Het he n p ro po un ds t he u ni fi ed t he ol og ic al m es sa ge o f t he O ld a nd N ew
T e s t a m e n t a c c o u n t s : “ T h e r e , o n e c o m e s t o t h e w e l l s a n d t h e w a t e r s t h a t
brides may b e fo un d; an d t he c hu rc h i s u ni te d t o C hr is t i n t he b at h o f
water.”3
Ori gen al so percei ves a conn ec ti on b et ween John’ s st or y o f the
a no in ti ng a t B et ha ny a nd t he S on g o f S on gs . H e i nt er pr et s S on g 1 :1 2,
“ W h i l e t h e k i n g w a s o n h i s c o u c h , m y n a r d g a v e f o r t h i t s f r a g r a n c e , ” i n
l i g h t o f J o h n 1 2 : 3 , “ M a r y t o o k a p o u n d o f c o s t l y p e r f u m e m a d e o f p u r e
1 Origen, H o m . G e n . 1 0 . 5 , i n H o m i l i e s o n G e n e s i s a n d E x o d u s ( t r a n s . R o n a l d E . He i n e ;F C 7 1 ; W a sh i ng t on , D . C. : T h e C a th o li c U n iv e rs i ty o f A m er i ca P r es s , 1982) , 1 67 .
2 Origen, C om m en t ar i i i n e v an g el i um J o an n is 1 3 .1 7 5– 7 8, i n C om me nt ar y o n t heG os pe l A cc or di ng t o J oh n: B oo ks 1 3– 32 ( tr an s. R on al d E . H ei ne ; F C 8 9; W as hi ng to n,D . C. : T h e C a th o li c U n iv e rs i ty o f A m er i ca P r es s , 1993) , 1 0 5 – 6 .
3 Origen, H o m. G e n. 1 0. 5.
1
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
20/193
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
21/193
t he n ot io n t ha t t he O ld a nd N ew T es ta me nt s p re se nt o ne u ni fi ed t he o-
l og ic al m es sa ge . N ot m an y c on te mp or ar y s ch ol ar s w ou ld a gr ee t ha t
biblical stories about a man and a woman meetin g at a well have
a ny th in g t o d o w it h b ap ti sm , o r t ha t S on g 1 :1 2 s ho ul d b e i nt er pr et edi n l i g h t o f J o h n 1 2 : 3 . I n d e e d , o n l y a f e w w o u l d u n d e r s t a n d t h e S o n g o f
So ng s as an yt hi ng b ut er ot ic p oet ry t ha t f ou nd i ts w ay i nt o t he c an on
b ec au se i t w as a tt ri bu te d to S ol om on , i n te rp re te d a ll eg o ri ca ll y, a nd
c ha mp io n ed b y R . A ki b ah .8
R ec en t d ev el o pm en t s, h ow e ve r, h av e o pe ne d t h e w ay f or a r en ew ed
a pp re ci at io n o f a nc ie nt i nt er pr et at io ns . W it hi n t he l as t f ew d ec -
a de s , s o me e xe ge te s h av e c ha ll en ge d m an y o f t he p re su pp os it io ns o f
e i gh t ee n th - c en t ur y r a ti o n al i s m, a s w e ll a s o f n i ne t ee n t h- a n d t w en t i et h -
c en t ur y h i st o ri ca l c ri t ic is m. C hi ef a mo n g t he s e i s t h e a ss um pt i on t h at
t he Bi bl e i s s ub jec t t o o bj ec ti ve i nt er pre ta ti on t hr ou gh an al ys is o f
h is t or ic al a nd l i te ra ry e vi d en ce , a lo ng w it h t h e r el at e d a ss u mp t io n t ha t
o nl y m od er n c ri ti cs w ho p er fo rm s uc h a na ly se s d es er ve a h ea ri ng . I t
has bee n p er su as iv el y a rg ue d t ha t o bj ec ti ve i nt er pr et at io n i s i mp os -
sible.9 I n l ig ht o f t hi s r ea li za ti on , t he a ca de my n ow w el co me s c on tr i-
b u ti o n s f r om r e ad e r- r es p o ns e c r it i cs , p o st - mo d er n e x eg e t es , a n d m a nyw ho se p ol it ic al a ge nd as r en de r t he ir r ea di ng s o ve rt ly s ub je ct iv e. A s
A . K . M . A d a m o b s e r v e s , “ I f . . . t h e r e a r e n o t t r a n s c e n d e n t c r i t e r i a f o r
i nt er pr et at io n, b ut o nl y l oc al c us to ms a nd g ui ld r ul es , t he r el uc ta nc e
m od er n N ew T es t am e nt t he ol og i an s e xp re s s a bo ut a dm it t in g t he p os -
s ib le l eg it im ac y o f o th er a pp ro pr ia ti on s o f t he N ew T es ta me nt is an
e x pr e ss i o n o f c u lt u r al i m pe r i al i s m a n d i n t el l e ct u al x e no p h ob i a. ”10
T hi s s ug g es t s t ha t t he r ea d in gs o f s o -c al le d p re -c ri t ic al i nt er p re te rs
s ho ul d n ot b e d is mi ss ed o ut o f h an d. I n t hi s mo no gra ph , I w il l a rg uet ha t O ri g en a nd H ip p ol y tu s w er e o n t h e r ig ht t ra ck i n s ev er a l r es p ec t s.
Fo r o ne, t he y w er e n ot h ea ri ng t hi ng s w he n t he y d et ec te d e ch oe s o f
wel l betrot hal storie s and the Song of So ngs i n the Fourth Gos pel.
I w i l l m a k e t h e c a s e t h a t J o h n i n d e e d a l l u d e s t o f o u r b i b l i c a l t e x t s a b o u t
m ar ri ag e . O ne i nv ol v es s i mi l ar i ti es b et we e n J es us ’ e nc ou n te r w it h t he
S am ar it a n w o m an i n J oh n 4 : 4 – 4 2 a nd t he s to ry a bo ut J ac ob a nd R ac he l
i n G e n . 2 9 : 1 – 2 0 . T w o o t h e r s e v o k e t h e S o n g o f S o n g s . M a r y o f B e t h a n y
p er fu me s t he r ec li ni ng J es us i n a s ce ne r em in is ce nt o f S on g 1 :1 2, a nd
8 M a r v i n P o p e b r i e f l y d i s c u s s e s t h e S o n g ’ s c a n o n i c a l s t a t u s i n S o n g o f S o n g s ( A B 7 C ;Ga r d en C i t y : Do u b le d a y , 1977) , 1 8 –1 9 .
9 S ee , e .g ., M ar y A nn T ol be rt , “ De fi ni ng t he P ro bl em : T he B ib le a nd F em in is tHermeneutics,” Semeia 28 (1983) : 1 1 3– 2 6.
10 A . K . M . A da m, M a ki n g S e ns e o f N e w T e st a me n t T h eo l og y : “ M od e rn ” P r ob l em sa n d P r o sp e c t s ( S tA B H 1 1 ; M a co n , G a .: M e rc e r U n iv e rs i ty P r es s , 1995) , 1 7 9 .
Allusions to biblical texts about marriage 3
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
22/193
M a r y M a g d a l e n e s e e k s a n d f i n d s h e r m i s s i n g m a n a s d o e s t h e w o m a n i n
Song 3:1 – 4 . A fourth allusi on is the first to occur in the Gos pel
n ar ra ti ve . I n J oh n 3 :2 9, John the Baptist decl are s, “He who has t he
b ri de i s t he b ri de gr oo m.11
T he f ri en d o f t he b ri de gr oo m, w ho s ta nd sa nd h ea r s h i m, re joices greatly at the bridegroom’s voice (tZ‘ n f o n Z‘ n
tou Ð numfi* ou).”12 T h i s s a y i n g r e c a l l s J e r . 3 3 : 1 0 – 1 1 : “ I n . . . t h e t o w n s o f
J u d a h a n d t h e s t r e e t s o f J e r u s a l e m . . . t h e r e s h a l l o n c e m o r e b e h e a r d t h e
v oi ce o f m ir th a nd t he v oi ce o f g la dn es s, t he vo i ce o f t he b ri de gr o om
(fonZ‘ numfi* ou) a n d t h e v o i c e o f t h e b r i d e . ”13
O ri ge n w as a ls o r ig h t t o a tt ri b ut e s om e f ig u ra ti v e m ea n in g t o J oh n’ s
w el l a nd a no in ti ng s to ri es . I n m y i nt er pr et at i on o f t he f ou r a ll us io ns ,
I w il l s ho w h ow t he y d ev el op a m ar ri ag e m et ap ho r, i nt ro du ce d i n t he
C an a w ed d in g s ce ne ( Jo hn 2 : 1– 11 ), t ha t d es cr ib es J es us a s t h e M es si a h
a nd d ep ic ts h i s r el at i on sh i p w it h t he b el i ev i ng c om mu n it y . I w i ll s t re ss
t h a t a l l C h r i s t i a n s s h o u l d b e a b l e t o a c c e p t a n d a p p r e c i a t e t h i s m e t a p h o r
s in ce J o hn d o es n ot u se i t t o r ei nf or c e o pp re s si v e g en de r r ol e s.
F in al ly , O ri ge n’ s a nd H ip po ly tu s’ b el ie f i n t he t he ol og ic al u ni ty o f
t h e S c r i p t u r e s i s r e l e v a n t b e c a u s e i t c l o s e l y r e s e m b l e s t h a t o f t h e F o u r t h
E va ng el is t. I w il l a rg ue t ha t t he G os pe l’ s i mp li ed a ut ho r c on si de re dJ er . 3 3: 10 – 11 , G en . 2 9: 1– 20 , a nd t he So ng o f S on gs a pp ro pr ia te f or
i ll us tr at in g t he l if e, d ea th , a nd r es ur re ct io n o f J es us b ec au se o f t he ir
m es si an i c s i gn i fi ca nc e. A cc o rd in g t o t h e c on ve n ti o ns o f f ir st - ce nt ur y
ex eg es is – c on ve nt io ns b as ed o n a b el ie f i n t he t he ol og ic al u ni ty o f
Sc ri pt ure – t hey c an b e i nt er pr et ed a s m es si an ic p ro ph eci es i n l ig ht
o f P s. 4 5 , w hi ch c el e br at es t he w ed d in g o f G od ’ s a no i nt ed k i ng .
A t u mu l t o f r e ve r be r at i o ns
I am c er ta in ly n ot t he fi rs t p os t- En li gh te nm en t c ri ti c t o h ea r ec ho es
o f b ib li cal t ex ts a bo ut ma rr ia ge i n t he F ou rt h G os pel . I n f ac t, e ar ly
trad iti ons of int erpret in g Joh n 4:4 – 4 2 and 20:1– 18 i n ligh t o f well
b et ro th al n ar rat iv es a nd t he So ng o f So ng s h av e b ee n p er pe tu at ed
t hr ou gh t he E nl ig ht en me nt a nd i nt o t he p re se nt . B ot h T he V en er ab le
B ed e ( 67 3– 73 5) a nd S t. J oh n o f t he C ro ss ( 15 42 –9 1) l in k J oh n’ s t om b
11 T h e a p p e l l a t i o n “ J o h n t h e B a p t i s t ” n e v e r a p p e a r s i n t h e F o u r t h G o s p e l . I u s e i t h e r et o d i st i ng u is h J o hn t h e B a pt i st f r om J o hn t h e E v an g el is t .
12 T he G re ek te xt o f t he F ou rt h G os pel i s t ak en f ro m N A27. I d is cu ss s ig ni fi ca ntv a ri a nt s i n t h e f o ot n ot e s.
13 T he p as sa ge r ec ko ne d a s J er . 3 3: 1– 13 i n H eb re w a nd E ng li sh B ib le s a pp ea rs a tJ er . 4 0: 1– 13 i n t he L X X.
4 The Bridegroom Messiah and the People of God
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
23/193
s to ry w it h S on g 3 :1 – 4 .14 T hi s e xe ge ti ca l t ra di ti on h as f ou nd i ts w ay
i nt o t he R om an C at ho li c l ec ti on ar y: S on g 3 :1 –5 i s r ea d o n t he F ea st o f
S t . M a r y M a g d a l e n e ( J u l y 2 2 ) . A s i m i l a r t r a d i t i o n h a s b e e n p r e s e r v e d i n
t he w or k o f a t l ea st o ne n in et ee nt h- ce nt ur y P ro te st an t s ch ol ar . I n h ism a gn u m o p u s, T he L if e o f J es u s C ri t ic a ll y E xa mi n ed , D av i d F ri ed ri c h
Strauss ex pl or es t he c on ne ct io n b et we en J oh n 4 a nd t he G en es is w el l
stories.15
I n t h e w ak e o f t h es e t ra di t io n s, s ev er al t we nt i et h -c en tu ry e xe ge te s
h av e p ro po se d a ll us io ns t o G en . 2 9: 1– 20 , S on g 1 :1 2; 3 :1 – 4 , a nd J er .
3 3: 10 – 11 . T he y h av e a ls o d et ec te d r ef er en ce s t o a w ho le h os t o f o th er
t e x t s , m o s t o f w h i c h h a v e s o m e t h i n g t o d o w i t h m a r r i a g e . F o r e x a m p l e ,
Michel Cambe hear s several echoe s i n John 3:29 . He affirms t hat
J oh n t he B ap ti st ’s b ri de gr oo m s ay in g m ay a ll ud e t o J er . 3 3: 10 – 11 .16
H e a ls o a gr ee s w it h J oh n H . B er na rd a nd W al te r B au er , w ho n ot e t he
s i mi l ar i t y b e t we e n J o h n’ s p h ra s e “ t he b r id e gr o o m’ s v o i ce (tZ‘ n f o n Z‘ n
to u Ð numfi* ou)” and “the voic e o f the bridegro om (fonZ‘ numfi* ou)”
me nt io ne d i n J er . 7 :3 2– 34 , 1 6: 9, an d 2 5: 10 .17 T he se p ro ph e ci es d e-
s cr ib e h ow “ th e v oi ce o f t he b ri de gr oo m, ” a lo ng w it h “ th e v oi ce o f t he
b ri de ” an d t he s ou nd o f m ir th a nd g la dn es s, w il l e ve nt ual ly c ea se i nJ e r u s a l e m . I n a d d i t i o n , C a m b e n o t e s t h a t o t h e r s h a v e d e t e c t e d e c h o e s o f
the Song o f So ngs in Joh n 3: 29. André F eu il le t ma ke s t he c as e f or
a ll us io ns t o S on g 2 :8 –1 4 a nd 5 :2 – 6 , p assag es t ha t d es cr ib e t he b ri de ’s
e ag er r es po ns e t o h er b el ov ed ’s v oi ce .18 E ve n m or e c on vi nc in g f or
14 T h e V e ne r ab l e B e de , I n C a n ti c a C a n t ic o r u m A l l eg o r i ca E x p os i t i o, i n P L 9 1: 11 20 ;S t . J o h n o f t h e C r o s s , D a r k N i g h t o f t h e S o u l 2 . 1 3 . 6 , i n D a r k N i g h t o f t h e S o u l ( t r an s . a n d
e d. E . A ll is on P ee rs ; 3 v ol s; 3 rd r ev . e dn .; N ew Y or k: D o ub le da y, 1990) , 14 0 – 4 2.15 D av id F ri ed ri ch S tr au ss , T he L if e o f J esu s C ri ti ca lly Ex am in ed ( ed . P et er C . Ho d g s on ; t r a ns . Ge o r ge E l i o t; P h i l ad e l ph i a : F o r t r e s s , 1972) , 3 08 .
16 M i c h e l C a m b e , “ L ’ i n f l u e n c e d u C a n t i q u e d e s C a n t i q u e s s u r l e No u v e a u T e s t a m e n t , ” RThom 62 (1962) : 1 4. S ee a ls o J ac qu es W in an dy , “ Le C an ti qu e d es C an ti qu es e t l e
No u v e au T e s t am e n t, ” RB 7 1 ( 1 9 6 4) : 1 6 8 – 6 9 ; F r a n ço i s - M a ri e B r a u n , Jean le thé ologien 2: Les grandes traditions d’Israë l e t l ’ ac c or d d e s éc r it u re s s e lo n l e q u at r ieme évangi le( Ebib; P a r i s : Ga b a l d a , 1964) , 1 9 7 a n d Jean le théologien 3.1: Sa théologie: Le myster e d e
Jésus-Christ ( Ebib; P a r i s : G a b a l d a , 1966) , 1 0 1 ; M a r t i n H e n g e l , “ T h e I n t e r p r e t a t i o n o f t h eW i n e M i r a c l e a t C a n a : J o h n 2 : 1 – 1 1 , ” t r a n s . Ge r h a r d S c h m i d t , i n T h e G l o r y o f C h r i s t i n t h e
New Testament ( ed . L . D . H ur st a nd N . T . W ri gh t; O xf or d: C la re nd on , 1987) , 1 01 –2 ;M i rj a m Z i mm e rm an n a n d R u be n Z i mm e rm an n , “ D er F r eu n d d e s B r äu t i g am s ( J o h 3 , 2 9 ):De f l or a t io n s - o d e r C h r i st u s z eu g e ? ” ZNW 90 (1999) : 1 26 – 27 .
17 J o h n H . B e r n a r d , A C r i t i c a l a n d E x e g e t i c a l C o m m e n t a r y o n t h e G o s p e l A c c o r d i n g t oS t. J oh n ( e d. A . H . M cN ei le ; I CC ; E di nb ur gh : T &T C la rk , 1928) , I : 13 1 ; W a lt e r B a ue r ,
Das Johannes-Evangelium ( 3 r d e d n . ; H N T 6 ; T ü b i n g en : M o h r S i e b ec k , 1933) , 6 3 .18 André F e ui ll et , “ Le s ym bo li sm e d e l a c ol om be d an s l es r éci ts évangél iq ue s d u
Baptême,” RSR 46 (1958) : 5 40 ; “ Le C an ti qu e d es c an ti qu es e t l ’A po ca ly ps e, ” RSR 49( 19 61 ): 3 34 , n . 8 ; “ La r ec he rc he d u C hr is t d an s l a n ou ve ll e a ll ia nc e d ’a pr ès l a c hr is to -phanie de Jo 20,11–18: Comparaison avec C ant. 3,1– 4 et l’épisode des pèlerins
Allusions to biblical texts about marriage 5
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
24/193
C a m b e i s P . J o ü o n ’ s b e l i e f t h a t J o h n 3 : 2 9 a l l u d e s t o S o n g 8 : 1 3 : “ O y o u
w h o d w e l l i n the g a rd e ns , m y c om pa ni o ns a re l i st e ni n g f or y o ur v oi ce ;
l e t m e h e a r i t . ”19
A ll us io ns t o ma rri ag e t ex ts a re a ls o d is ce rn ed i n t he w el l s ce ne o f J oh n 4 :4 – 4 2. J er ome H . N ey rey a nd C al um M . Ca rmi ch ae l c on te nd
w it h m e tha t t hi s s ce ne al lu de s t o t he J ac ob an d Ra ch el s to ry i n G en .
29:1–20.20 O th er s h ea r d i ff er en t e ch o es . S ch o la rs s uc h a s F ra nço i s -
M ar i e B ra un a nd M ar i e- Ém il e B oi s ma r d p oi n t o ut s ev er al v er ba l s i mi -
l ari ti es b et wee n J oh n 4 :4 – 4 2 a nd t he s ce ne w it h A br ah am ’s s er va nt
and Reb ekah in Gen . 24:1 – 6 7, while E. C. Hos kyns and Gerh ard
F ri ed ri ch r ec og ni ze a n a ll us io n t o t he e nc ou nt er b et we en Mos es a nd
Z ip po ra h ( Ex od . 2 :1 5– 22 ) a s t ol d b y J os ep hu s ( Ant . 2 .2 5 7) .21 Aileen
G ui ld in g s ug ge st s t ha t J oh n r ef er s t o E xo d. 2 :1 5– 22 a lo ng w it h o ne o f
t he G en es i s s to ri es ; f or A nnie J au be r t, t he r el ev an t p as sa g es a re E x od .
2 :1 5– 2 2 a nd G en . 2 9: 1 –2 0 .22
d’Emmaü s ,” in L ’ ho m me d e va n t D i eu (Théo lo gi e 5 6 – 58 ; P ar is : A u bi er , 1963) , I :1 06 ; Le Myster e d e l ’ a m ou r d i v i n d a n s l a t h éo l o g ie j o h a nn i q ue ( Ebib; P a ri s : G a ba l da , 1972),
2 3 1 ; a n d J e s u s a n d H i s M o t h e r : T h e R o l e o f t h e V i r g i n M a r y i n S a l v a t i o n H i s t o r y a n d t h e
Place of Woman in the Church ( t r a n s . L . M a l u f ; S t i l l R i v e r , M a s s . : S t . B e d e ’ s , 1974) , 1 2 ;C a mb e , “ I nf l ue n ce d u C a nt i qu e ,” 1 3 .
19 P . J oüon, L e C a nt i qu e d e s c a nt i qu e s ( P a r i s: B e a u ch e s n e, 1909) , 3 3 1– 3 2; C a mb e ,“ In fl ue nc e d u C an ti qu e, ” 1 5. S ee a ls o B ra un , J e a n l e t h éol o g i en 2, 198 and J ea n l ethéologien 3.1, 9 3, 1 01 –2 ; F eu il le t, “ Sy mb ol is me d e l a c ol om be ,” 5 40 ; “ Ca nt iq ue e tl ’A po ca ly ps e, ” 3 34 n . 8 ; “ Re ch er ch e d u C hr is t, ” 1 06 ; Myster e d e l ’a mo ur d iv in, 23 1;and J e s u s a n d H i s M o t h e r , 1 2 . F o r a c r i t i q u e o f t h i s p o s i t i o n , s e e W i n a n d y , “ C a n t i q u e e t l eN T ,” 1 6 7, 1 7 2.
20 J e r o m e H . N e y r e y , “ J a c o b T r a d i t i o n s a n d t h e I n t e r p r e t a t i o n o f J o h n 4 : 1 0 – 2 6 , ” CBQ41 (1979) : 4 2 5 – 2 6 ; C a l u m M . C a r m i c h a e l , “ M a r r i a g e a n d t h e S a m a r i t a n W o m a n , ” NTS 26
(1980) : 3 3 2– 3 7.21 Braun, J e a n l e t h éo l og i en 3 . 1, 9 3– 95 ; M ar ie -Ém il e B oi sm ar d, “ Ae no n p rès deS a l e m: J e a n I I I .2 3 , ” RB 8 0 ( 1 97 3 ): 2 2 5; M a ri e -Ém i le B o is m ar d a n d A r na u d L a mo u il l e,
L’É v a n g i l e d e J e a n ( S y n o p s e d e s q u a t r e é v a n g il e s e n f r a n ça i s I I I ; P a r i s: C e r f , 1 9 7 9 ), 1 3 6 ;E . C . H os ky ns , T h e F o ur t h G o sp e l ( ed . F ra nc is N oe l D av ey ; L on do n: F ab er & F ab er ,1940) , 2 6 3 ; Ge r h a r d F r i e d r i c h , W e r i s t J e s u s ? D i e V e r k ü n d i g u n g d e s v i e r t e n E v a n g e l i s t e n ,d ar ge st ell t a n J oh 4 ,4 – 4 2 ( S t u t t ga r t : C a l we r, 1967) , 2 5. I n a gr ee me nt w it h B ra un a ndB o is m ar d a r e P h il i pp e D a go n et (S el on S ai nt J ea n: U ne f em me d e S am ar ie [ P a r is : C e r f ,1979] , 4 7 – 5 3 ) a n d M a r c G i r a r d ( “ J és u s e n S a ma r ie [ J ea n 4 , 1 – 4 2 ]: A n al y se d e s s t r uc t ur e ss t yl i st i qu e s e t d u p r oc ès d e s y m b ol i s at i o n ,” EgT 1 7 [ 1 98 6 ]: 3 0 2– 3 ).
22
Ai l e e n Gu i l d i n g , T h e F o u r t h G o s p e l a n d J e w i s h W o r s h i p : A S t u d y o f t h e R e l a t i o n o f S t. J oh n’ s G os pe l t o t he A nc ie nt J ew is h L ec ti on ar y S ys te m ( Ox f or d : Ox f o rd Un i v er s i tyPress, 1960) , 2 31 ; A nn ie J au be rt , “ La s ym bo li qu e d u p ui ts d e J ac ob : J ea n 4 ,1 2, ” i n
L’homme devant Dieu, I : 63 – 73 ; A p pr oc he s d e l ’É v an gi le d e J ea n ( P a ri s : S e ui l , 1 9 76 ) ,5 8 – 6 3 ; a n d “ L a s y mb o li q ue d e s f e mm e s d a ns l e s t r ad i ti o ns r e li g ie u se s : U n e r e co n si d ér-a ti on d e l ’Év a ng i le d e J e an , ” RUO 5 0 ( 19 80 ): 1 18 –1 9. N or ma nd R . B on ne au b ui ld s o nG ui ld in g’ s w or k ( “T he W om an a t t he W el l, J oh n 4 a nd G en es is 2 4, ” TBT 6 7 [ 1 97 3 ]:1 2 5 2 – 5 9 ) , a s d o e s E u g e n e D . S t o c k t o n ( “ T h e F o u r t h G o s p e l a n d t h e W o m a n , ” i n E s s a y s i n
Faith and Culture [ ed . N ei l B ro wn ; F ai th a nd C ul tu re 3 ; C at ho li c I ns ti tu te o f S yd ne y,1 9 7 9 ] , 1 4 2 ) . B i r g e r Ol s s o n d e v e l o p s J a u b e r t ’ s t h e s i s ( S t r u c t u r e a n d M e a n i n g i n t h e F o u r t h
6 The Bridegr oom Messiah and the People of God
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
25/193
T h e s e c r i t i c s w e r e j o i n e d b y m a n y m o r e f o l l o w i n g t h e p u b l i c a t i o n o f
R o b e rt A lte r ’s T he A r t o f B ib l ic a l N ar ra t iv e i n 1 9 8 1 . O n e o f t h e m a n y
c on tr ib ut io ns t o l it er ar y c ri ti ci sm o f t he B ib le p ut f or wa rd b y A lt er i n
t h at v o lu m e i s h i s h y p ot h e si s c o nc e rn i n g c o nv e n ti o na l t y pe - s ce n es . T oi l lu st ra te t h ei r f un ct i on , h e p re s en t s a d et ai l ed a na ly si s o f t he s o- c al l ed
“ be tr ot ha l t yp e- sc en e” i n w hi ch a m an o n a j ou rn ey m ee ts a maid e n a t
a w el l, w at er i s d ra wn a nd s ha re d, a nd a m ar ri ag e i s a rr an ge d.23
A s a p ro fe ss or o f H eb re w a nd C om pa ra ti ve L it er at ur e, A lt er n ev er
e x t e n d s h i s o b s e r v a t i o n s t o i n c l u d e t h e s t o r y o f J e s u s a n d t h e S a m a r i t a n
w om an . N ew T es t am en t s ch o la rs , h ow e ve r, h av e n ot h es i ta te d t o a va il
t he ms el ve s o f h is i ns ig ht s i n i nt er pr et in g t hi s p as sa ge . A ft er a ll , J oh n
4 :4 – 4 2 f ol lo ws t he s ta nd ar d f or ma t o f a “ be tr ot ha l t yp e- sc en e” : J es us
journeys to Samaria, meets a woman at a well, and engages her in a
c on ve rs at io n a bo ut w at er . A mo ng t he m an y w ho r ea d J oh n 4 :4 – 4 2 a s
a “ be t ro th al t y pe -s ce ne ” a re P . J os ep h C ah i ll , R . A la n C ul p ep p er , P au l
D . D uk e, a nd J ef fr ey L l oy d S ta le y.24
G o sp e l: A T e xt - Li n gu i st ic A n al y si s o f J o hn 2 : 1– 1 1 a n d 4 : 1– 4 2 [ t ra n s. J e an G r ay ; CB 6;L u n d : Gl e e r u p , 1974] , 1 6 9 – 7 3 , 2 5 6 – 5 7 ) . F o r m o r e g e n e r a l r e f e r e n c e s t o e c h o e s o f b i b l i c a l
w el l b et ro th al n ar ra ti ve s i n J oh n 4 , s ee J os ep h C ol so n, “ Le s n oc es d u C hr is t ( No uv ea uT e s t am e nt ) , ” i n Un r oi f it d es n oc es à s on f il s ( B r u ge s : De s c lée d e B ro uw er , 1961) , 1 34 – 35 ;J o h n B l i g h , “ J e s u s i n S a m a r i a , ” HeyJ 3 (1962) : 3 3 2 ; J . N . S a n d e r s , A C o m m e n t a r y o n t h eG o sp e l A c co r di n g t o S t . J o hn ( e d . B . A . M a s t i n ; B N T C ; L o n d o n : B l a c k , 1968), 1 40 – 4 1,1 44 ; J am es D . P ur vi s, “ Th e F ou rt h G os pe l a nd t he S am ar it an s, ” NovT 17 (1975) : 1 94 ;J . Du n c a n M . De r r e t t , “ T h e S a m a r i t a n W o m a n ’ s P i t c h e r , ” DRev 1 0 2 ( 1 9 8 4 ) : 2 5 2 – 6 1 .
23 R o b e rt Al t e r, T h e A r t o f B i b l i c a l N a r r a t i v e ( N e w Y o r k : B a s i c B o o k s , 1981) , 5 1 – 5 8 .A l t e r f o l l o w s t h e l e a d o f R o b e r t C . C u l l e y , w h o c o n c l u d e s t h a t t h e s i m i l a r i t i e s b e t w e e n t h eG e ne s is a n d E x od u s w e ll b e tr o th a l n a rr a ti v es s u gg e st t h e p o ss i bi l it y t h at “ a t r ad i ti o na le pi so de . . . h as b ee n e mp lo ye d i n a nd a da pt ed t o d if fe re nt c on te xt s” (S tu di es i n t he
S t r u ct u re o f H e b r ew N a r r at i v e [Philadelphia: Fortress, 1976] , 4 1– 4 3) .24 P . J os ep h C ah il l, “ Na rr at iv e A rt i n J oh n I V, ” R e l ig i o u s S t u d ie s B u l le t i n 2 (1982):4 1– 4 8; R . A la n C ul pe pp er , A na to my o f t he F ou rt h G os pe l: A S tu dy i n L it er ar y D es ig n(Philadelphia: Fortress, 1983) , 1 36 ; P au l D . D uk e, Irony in the Fourth Gospel ( At l an t a : J o h nKnox, 1985) , 1 0 1– 3 ; J e ff r ey L l oy d S t al e y, T h e P ri n t’ s F i rs t K i ss : A R h et o ri c al I n ve s ti -g at io n o f t he I mp li ed R ea de r i n t he F ou rt h G os pe l ( S B LD S 8 2 ; A t la n ta : S c ho l ar s P r es s ,1988) , 9 8 –1 0 2. F o r a d d i ti o na l r e f e re n ce s t o J o hn 4 : 4 – 4 2 a s a “ b et r ot h al t y pe - sc e ne , ” s e eW a l te r R e b e ll , G e me i nd e a l s G e ge n we l t: Z u r s o zi o lo g is c he n u n d d i da k ti s ch e n F u nk t io n d e s
Johannesevangelium ( F r a nk f u r t: L a n g , 1987) , 1 89 ; L yl e E sl in ge r, “ Th e W oo in g o f t heW o ma n a t t h e W e ll : J e su s , t h e R e ad e r, a n d R e ad e r- R es p on s e C r it i ci s m, ” Li t e ra t u r e a n d
Theology 1 /1 (1987) : 1 67 –8 3; r ep r. i n T he G os pe l o f J oh n a s L it er at ur e ( ed . M ar kW . G . S ti bb e; L ei de n: B ri ll , 1993) , 1 65 –8 2; P au l T ru di ng er , “ Of W om en , W el ls , W at er po tsa nd W in e! R ef le ct io ns o n J oh an ni ne T he me s ( Jo hn 2 :1 –1 1 a nd 4 :1 – 4 2) ,” S t . M a rk ’ s R e vi e w1 5 1 (1992) : 1 0 – 1 6 ; M a r k W . G . S t i b b e , John ( S h e f f i e l d : J S OT P r e s s , 1993) , 6 8 – 6 9 ; A d e l eR ei nh ar tz , “ Th e G o sp el o f J oh n, ” i n S e ar c hi n g t h e S c ri p tu r es : A F em i ni s t C o mm e nt a ry (ed.E l i s ab e t h S c h üs s le r F i or e nz a , e t a l .; N e w Y o rk : C r os s ro a d, 1994) , I I :5 7 2– 7 3; C . C l if t onB l ac k , “ R he t or ic a l C r it i ci s m a n d t h e N e w T e st a me n t, ” i n H e ar i ng t h e N e w T e st a me n t:Strategies for Interpretation ( e d . J o e l B . G r e e n ; G r a n d R a p i d s : E e r d m a n s , 1995) , 2 7 0 – 7 1 ;J oa n E . C oo k, “ We ll s, W om en , a nd F ai th ,” i n P ro c ee d in g s, E a st e rn G r ea t L a ke s a n d
Midwest Biblical Societies 17 (1997) : 1 1– 18 ; L ar ry P au l J on es , T he S ym bo l o f W at er i n
Allusions to biblical texts about marriage 7
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
26/193
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
27/193
T he m os t s us ta i ne d t re at me n t t o d at e o f J oh n’ s a ll us i on s t o m ar r ia ge
t e x t s i s t h e w o r k o f A n n R o b e r t s W i n s o r . S h e d e v o t e s h e r b o o k , A K i n g
Is Bound in the Tresses, t o t he n um er ou s e ch oe s o f t he S on g o f S on gs
she detect s i n Jo hn 12: 1–3 an d 20:1 , 11–18. Winso r cont ends thatJ o h n ’ s “ a l l u s i o n s t o t h e S on g f o l lo w t h e i n t er t ex t u al p r ac t ic e c h ar a ct e r-
i s t i c o f b i b l i c a l n a r r a t i v e . ”29 S h e f i n d s t h i s p r a c t i c e d e s c r i b e d b y M i c h e l
R if fa te rr e a nd Z iv a B en -P or at , s o s he u se s t he ir t he or ie s t o d ev el op a
m et h od f or i d en t if yin g a nd i nt er pr et in g a ll us io ns i n J oh n’ s a no in ti ng
a nd g ar de n s ce ne s.30 F ir st , W in so r n o te s t h e p re se nc e i n J oh n ’s n ar ra -
t iv e o f w ha t R if fa terr e t er ms “ un gr a mm at i ca li t ie s” ; t h at i s , d et a il s t h at
seem out o f p lace.31 Su ch d etai ls s ig na l a n a ll us io n t o a no th er t ex t
w her e t hey a re mo re a t h om e.32 N ex t, W in s or d et er mi n es t h e e vo ke d
t ex t b y e xa mi n in g i t s v er ba l a nd t he ma t ic s im i la ri ti es w it h t h e o ri gi n at -
i ng t ex t .33 O nc e t he e vo ke d t ex t i s r ec og ni ze d, i t c ha ng es t he c on te xt
of the origi nating t ex t such t hat al l el eme nts of bot h text s begi n to
interact.34
U si n g t hi s m et h od , W in s or f in ds t ha t t hi rt ee n w or ds o r i d ea s i n J oh n
1 2: 1– 3; 2 0: 1, 1 1– 18 c or re sp on d w it h a bo ut s ix ty v er ba l a nd t he ma ti c
p ara ll el s i n t he So ng o f S on gs . I n J oh n 1 2: 1– 2, f or e xa mple , J es us a tt ab le i s r emi ni sc en t o f t he re cl in in g k in g o f S on g 1 :1 2.35 T he t er m
pistikZ
B i n J o h n 1 2 : 3 m a y b e a c o r r u p t i o n o f tZ
B s t a k t Z
B, m e n t i o n e d
in So ng 1:1 3: “My belo ved is to me a bag of myrrh (tZ
B s ta kt Z
B)
t ha t l i es b et we en m y b re a st s. ”36 M ar y o f B et ha ny ’s w i pi n g J es us ’ f ee t
w i t h h e r h a i r i n J o h n 1 2 : 3 c a l l s t o m i n d t h e k i n g o f S o n g 7 : 5 ( 6 ) w h o i s
h el d c ap ti ve i n h is l ov er ’s t res se s, a lo ng w it h t he b at hed f ee t o f t he
a r o u s e d w o m a n i n S o n g 5 : 3 a n d t h e g r a c e f u l f e e t o f t h e q u e e n l y m a i d e n
r e c k o n e d a s 6 : 1 3 i n E n g l i s h t r a n s l a t i o n s b u t a s 7 : 1 b y t h e M T a n d L X X . S i m i l a r n o t a t i o ne l se w he r e i n di c at e s s i mi la r v a ri a ti o ns o f v e rs e a n d c h ap t er n u mb e rs i n S o ng 6 – 7 .
29 An n R o b e r t s W i n s o r , A K i n g I s B o u n d i n t h e T r e s s e s : A l l u s i o n s t o t h e S o n g o f S o n g si n t h e F o ur t h G o sp e l ( S tu d ie s i n B i bl i ca l L i te r at u re 6 ; N e w Y o rk : L a ng , 1999) , 1 .
30 S e e M i c h el R i f f at e r re , S e m io t ic s o f P o et r y ( Adv a n c es i n S e m i ot i c s; B l o o mi n g t on :I n d i an a Un i v er s i ty P r e s s, 1978; Z i v a B e n - P o r a t , “ T h e P o e t i c s o f L i t e r a r y A l l u s i o n , ” PTL:
A Journal for Descriptive Poetics and Theory of Literature 1 (1976) : 1 0 5– 2 8.31 Winsor, A K i n g I s B o u n d , 8 ; R i ff a te r re , Semiotics, 5.32 Winsor, A K i n g I s B o u n d , 8 – 9 ; R i f f a t e rr e , Semiotics, 1 6 4 – 6 5 .33 Winsor, A K i n g I s B o u n d , 1 0 ; B e n- P or a t, “ P oe t ic s, ” 1 0 7– 8 .34 Winsor, A K i n g I s B o u n d , 1 1 ; B e n- P or a t, “ P oe t ic s, ” 1 1 6.35 Winsor, A K i n g I s B o u n d , 2 2 .36 Ibid., 2 3. T he i de a o f a p os si bl e c or ru pt io n o ri gi na te d w it h P au l- Lo ui s C ou ch ou d
( “N ot es d e c ri ti qu e v er ba le s ur S t. M ar c e t S t. M at th ie u, ” JTS 34 [1933] : 1 28 ). S ee a ls oR a ym on d E . B r ow n , T h e G o s p e l A c c o r d i n g t o J o h n I – X I I ( A B 2 9 ; G a rd e n C i ty : D o ub l e-day, 1966) , 2 20 – 21 .
Allusions to biblical texts about marriage 9
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
28/193
i n S o n g 7 : 1 ( 2 ) .37 T h e f r a g r a n t p e r f u m e o f J o h n 1 2 : 3 a l l u d e s t o t h e b a g
o f m y r r h i n S o n g 1 : 1 3 a n d t h e s c e n t o f S o n g 1 : 3 , 4 , a n d 1 2 – al o n g w i t h
t we nt y- e ig ht o t he r r ef er en ce s t o s ce nt i n t he S on g o f S on gs .38
S i m i l a r p a r a l l e l s l i n k t h e S o n g t o J o h n 2 0 : 1 , 1 1 – 1 8 . F o r i n s t a n c e , t h etomb (mnZmei
on) in Jo hn 2 0:1, 11 is remin iscen t o f th e chamber
(tami* eio n) in Song 1:4; 3 :4; and 8 :2, wh ile the ga rd en ( Jo hn 1 9: 41 )
e vo ke s t he S on g’ s s et ti ng ( 4: 12 , 1 6; 5 :1 ; 8 :1 3) .39 Mar y M a gd a l en e ’s
n oc tu rn al s ea rc h ( Jo hn 2 0: 1, 1 5) e ch oe s S on g 3 :1 – 4 .40 H er t wo e ni g-
ma ti c t ur ns i n J oh n 2 0: 14 , 1 6 a re u ng ra mm at ic al it ie s t hat sig nal an
a ll us i on t o t he t u rn i ng S hu la mm i te m ai d en o f S on g 6 : 13 ( 7: 1) .41 Jesus’
ad dre ss i n J oh n 2 0: 16 a ll ud es t o t he b el ov ed ’s v oi ce i n S on g 5 :2 , 6 ,
wh il e M ar y’ s t es ti mo ny i n J oh n 2 0: 18 r es emb les t he v oi ce f ro m t he
g ar de n i n S on g 8 :1 3.42 F in al ly , J es us ’ p ro hi bi ti on “ Do n ot h ol d m e”
( Jo h n 2 0: 1 7) m ar ks a r ef er en ce t o S on g 3 :4 .43
W i ns or c on cl ud es t h at t h e F ou rt h G os p el a ll ud es t o t he e nt i re S on g.
“ Un de rs ta n di n g t h e J oh an n in e a no i nt i ng a nd r es ur re c ti o n a pp ea ra nc e
n ar ra ti ve s r eq ui re s a g ra sp o f t he [ So ng o f S on gs ] a s w el l, ” s he w ri te s,
“f or t he Song i s a ll ud ed t o n ot j us t o nc e o r i nc id en tal ly , b ut c om pr e-
hensively.”
44
S h e s u p p o r t s t h i s a r g u m e n t b y p o i n t i n g o u t t h a t t h e F o u r t hG os pe l a nd t he S on g o f S on gs s ha re s im il ar t en de nc ie s a nd m ay h av e
e me rg ed f ro m s im il ar s oc ia l s et ti ng s. T he S on g s ta nd s “ as a s in gu la r
af fi rma ti on o f w om en ’s e xp er ie nc e an d au th or it y, ” a nd the Fo ur th
Go sp el s har es t he So ng ’s u nd er st an di ng o f g en der r ol es .45 Winsor
t he or iz es t h at “ th o se w ho c om p os ed , p re se rve d , a nd h an de d d ow n t he
s on gs t hat b eca me t he S on g” w er e w ome n.46 S he t he n s ug ge st s t ha t
J o h n ’ s a l l u s i o n s t o t h e S o n g m a y h a v e o r i g i n a t e d i n a n e a r l y s t r a t u m o f
t h e J o h a n n i n e c o m m u n i t y . S h e p o s t u l a t e s a g r o u p i n f l u e n c e d l a r g e l y b yw om en w ho v al ued t h e S on g’ s e mp ha si s o n h um an r el at io ns hi ps a nd
p h y s ica l s e n s atio n .47
M ak i ng s en se o f t he e ch oe s
T he e ch oe s h ear d b y O ri ge n a nd H ip po ly tu s h av e ce rt ai nl y n ot d ie d
a w a y . S c h o l a r s s t i l l d e t e c t t h e m , a l o n g w i t h a w h o l e t u m u l t o f r e v e r b e r a -
t io n s t h at t ho s e t wo v en er ab l e t h eo lo gi an s w ou l d n ev er h av e i ma gi n ed .
37 Winsor, A K i n g I s B o u n d , 2 0 – 2 2 , 2 3 – 2 5 .38 Ibid., 2 2 –2 3 , 2 5 –2 7 . S e e a l so D e rr e tt , “ M ir i am a n d t h e R e su r re c ti o n, ” 1 7 8.39 Winsor, A K i n g I s B o u n d , 4 1– 4 2.40 Ibid., 4 1– 4 3. 41 Ibid., 3 7 –3 9 . 42 Ibid., 4 3– 4 4.43 Ibid., 4 0 – 4 1 . 44 Ibid., 4 9 . 45 Ibid., 6 1 – 6 2 .46 Ibid., 6 5 . 47 Ibid., 8 9 –9 0 .
10 The Bridegr oom Messiah and the People of God
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
29/193
T h e e c h o e s a r e r a r e l y h e a r d i n c o n c e r t , h o w e v e r . A l t h o u g h m a n y d e t e c t
r ef er en ce s t o m ar ri ag e t ex ts i n t h e F ou rt h G os pe l , f ew l i st en f or e ch oe s
i n mo re t ha n o ne o r t wo p as sag es . N o o ne h as y et at te mp te d t o m ak e
s en se o f p ro po sed a ll us io ns t o ma rr ia ge t ex ts i n J oh n 3 :2 9, 4 :4 – 4 2,1 2: 3, a nd 2 0: 1– 18 t og et he r, a nd i t h as n ev er b ee n s ug ge st ed t ha t J oh n
i nt er pr et s t h e m ar ri ag e t ex ts a s m es si a ni c p ro p he ci e s i n l i gh t o f P s. 4 5.
O nl y re ce nt ly h as a ny on e p ub li sh ed a n a cc ou nt o f t he f ac t t hat m or e
t ha n t wo o f t he se G os pe l p as sa ge s, n ot t o me nt io n t he Cana w ed d in g
s c e n e i n J o h n 2 : 1 – 1 1 , m a y r e f e r t o m a r r i a g e i n s o m e w a y .48
O ne s uc h s ch ol ar i s G il be rt e B ar il , w ho c on so li da te s p re vi ou s r e-
s e a r c h i n t o a b r i e f y e t b r o a d s u m m a r y o f m a r r i a g e i m a g e r y i n J o h n . S h e
d ev ot es f iv e p ag es o f h er b oo k, Th e F em in in e F ace o f t he P eo pl e o f
God , t o “ Th e e sp ou se d c om mu ni ty i n S t J oh n. ”49 R el yi ng o n t he w or k
o f B o i s m a r d , B a r i l c o n t e n d s t h a t J o h n t h e B a p t i s t ’ s s a y i n g i n J o h n 3 : 2 9
e st ab li sh es J es us a s “ th e b ri de gr oo m o f t he M es si an ic n up ti al s. ” A s
t he fr ie nd o f t he b ri de gr oo m, J oh n t he Ba pt i st p ur if i es t he e sp ou s ed
c om mu ni ty a nd p re se nt s t he m t o J es us .50 T he w ed di ng s ce ne i n J oh n
2 :1 –1 1 a ls o r emi nd s h er o f “ th e ete r na l n up t ia l f ea s t” c el eb ra t in g t he
u ni on o f J es us a nd h is f ol lo we rs .
51
B ar il a ff ir ms B ra un ’s t he or y t hatJ oh n 2 :1 –1 1 a nd J oh n 3 :2 9 a re l in ked t he ma ti ca ll y t o J oh n 4 :4 – 4 2.52
F ol l ow i ng J au be rt , s he i dent if ie s a ll us io ns t o G en . 2 9: 1– 20 a nd E xo d.
2 :1 5– 22 i n J oh n 4 :4 – 4 2.53 S he al so c onced es t ha t J oh n 2 0: 1– 18 m ay
e ch o S on g 3 :1 – 4 , a s p ro po se d b y C am be .54 T h e S a ma r i ta n w o ma n a n d
M a ry M a gd a l ene, B ar i l c o nc l ud e s , r e pr e se n t t h e b e li e vi n g c o mm u ni t y
u ni t ed t o C hr is t .55
48 A mo ng t ho se w ho b ri ef ly s ke tc h t he c on ne ct io ns b et we en J oh n 2 :1 –1 1, 3 :2 9, a nd4 :4 – 4 2 a re B li gh ( “J es us i n S am ar ia ,” 3 32 ), B ra un ( Jean le théologien 3.1, 9 3) , J oh nMa rsh (S ai nt J oh n [ W e s tm i ns t er P e li c an C o mm e nt a ri e s; P h il a de l ph i a: W e st m in s te r ,1968], 1 42 – 4 7, 1 96 , 21 4 – 16 ), J au ber t ( Approches, 6 1) , N ey re y ( “J ac ob T ra di ti on s, ”4 2 6) , C a rm i ch a el ( “ Ma r ri a ge a n d t h e S a ma r it a n W o ma n ,” 3 3 2– 3 3) , C a hi l l ( “ Na r ra t iv eA rt ,” 4 5) , D uk e ( Irony, 1 01 ), S ta le y ( Print’s First Kiss, 9 0 , 1 0 1 n . 3 5 ) , S t i b b e ( John, 6 1 ,6 9) , M an ns ( Lumier e d u j u d a ı̈s m e, 1 34 – 35 ), a nd J on es (S y mb o l o f W a te r , 9 2 ). W i na n dys e p a r a t e l y e v a l u a t e s p r o p o s e d a l l u s i o n s i n J o h n 3 : 2 9 ; 1 2 : 8 ; 2 0 : 1 – 1 8 ( “ C a n t i q u e e t l e N T , ”1 6 6 – 7 3 ) .
49
Gi l b er t e B a r i l, T he F em in in e F ac e o f t he P eo pl e o f G od : B ib li ca l S ym bo ls o f t heC hu rc h a s B ri de a nd M ot he r ( t ra n s . F l o r es t i ne Au d e tt e ; C o l l eg e v il l e , M i n n .: L i t u rg i c alPress, 1990) , 9 2 –9 7 .
50 Ibid., 9 3; c f. Ma ri e-Ém il e B oi sm ar d, “ L’ am i d e l ’ép ou x ( Jo ., I II , 2 9) ,” i n A lar e nc o nt r e d e D i eu ( P a r i s: M a p p us , 1961) , 2 8 9– 9 5.
51 Baril, F e m in i n e F a c e, 9 3 .52 Ibid.; c f. B ra un , Jean le théologien 3.1, 9 3 .53 Baril, F e m in i n e F a c e, 9 4 – 9 5 ; c f . J a u b e r t , Approches, 6 1 .54 Baril, F e m in i n e F a c e, 9 6 – 9 7; c f . C a mb e , “ I n f lu e nc e d u C a nt i qu e ,” 1 7 –1 9 .55 Baril, F e m in i n e F a c e, 9 7 .
Allusions to biblical texts about marriage 11
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
30/193
S ch ne id er s a ls o s ke tc he s t he d ev el op me nt o f a n up ti al t he me i n t he
F ou rt h G os pe l. I n h er b oo k, W ri tt en T ha t Y ou M ay B el ie ve, she com-
p il es s om e o f h er p re vi ou s w or k o n t he C an a m ir ac le , t he b ri de gr oo m
s ay in g, t he S am ar it an s to ry , a nd t he r es ur re ct io n n ar ra ti ve . S he s ee sJ oh n 2 :1 –1 1 a s t he i nt ro du ct io n o f J es us a s t he t ru e B ri de gr oo m w ho
s up pl ie s t he w in e f or t he w ed di ng f ea st . I n J oh n 3 :2 9, J esus i s agai n
i d e n t i f i e d a s a B r i d e g r o o m w h o s e b r i d e i s t h e N e w I s r a e l .56 Schneiders
affirms Cahil l’ s theo ry t hat J ohn 4 :4 – 42 i s a “t ype-st or y.”57 The
S am ar it a n w om an r ep re se nt s h er p eo pl e , “ wo o[ ed ] . . . t o f ull covenant
fi de li ty i n t he N ew I sr ae l b y J es us , t he n ew B ri de gro om. ”58 Finally,
S ch ne id er s a rg ue s t ha t J oh n 2 0: 1– 18 e ch oe s v ar io us s ce ne s f ro m t he
So ng o f So ng s. M ar y M ag da len e s ear ch es fo r J es us ( Jo hn 2 0: 1– 2,
1 1– 18 ) j us t a s t he S on g’ s b ri de s ea rc he s f or h er m is si ng m an ( 3: 1– 4 ;
5 :1 –8 ); f ir st t he B el ov ed D is ci pl e, t he n M ar y l oo k (paraku * pto) i nto
t h e t o m b ( J o h n 2 0 : 5 , 1 1 ) j u s t a s t h e S o n g ’ s b e l o v e d l o o k s ( paraku * pto)
i nt o t he b ri de ’s c ha mb er ( So ng 2 :9 ); J es us a nd M ar y p ro no un ce e ac h
o th er ’s n am es ( Jo hn 2 0: 1 6) j us t a s t he S on g’ s l o ve rs c la im o ne a no t he r
(S on g 2 :1 6) ; t he e nt ire s ce ne t ak es p la ce i n a g ard en ( Jo hn 1 9: 41 ) a s
d o e s m u c h o f t h e S o n g ( e . g . S o n g 4 : 1 2 ) . S i n c e f i r s t - c e n t u r y i n t e r p r e t e r su nd er st oo d t he S on g o f S on gs t o c el eb ra te t he c ov en an t b et we en G od
a nd I sr ae l, J oh n’ s M ar y M ag da le ne s ym bo li ze s “ th e J ohann i ne C om -
m un it y a s t he N ew I sr ae l, s po us e o f t he N ew C ov en an t. ”59 E ch oe s o f
the Song o f So ngs in Jo hn 20 t hus form t he culminat ion of John’s
nupti al theme, ill ustrati ng th e New Co venant between Jesus and
b e li e ve r s m a de p o ss i b le b y t h e r e su r re c t io n .60
B ar il ’s a nd S ch nei der s’ wo rk i s s ug ges ti ve , b ut t oo c ur so ry t o b e
c o n v i n c i n g . T h i s i s b e c a u s e e a c h o f t h e m s t u d i e s J o h n ’ s m a r r i a g e m o t i f as p art o f a l ar ge r p ro je ct . A de li ne Fe hr ib ac h d is cu ss es t he m ot if i n
m or e d et ai l. S he o ff er s a n e xt e ns iv e a na l ys i s o f J oh n’ s f em al e c ha ra c-
t ers i n h er b oo k T he W om en i n t he L if e o f t he B ri de gr oo m. F e hr i b ac h
asserts that “t he i mpl ied aut hor o f t he Fo urt h Gos pel drew on t he
lit erary and cu ltur al con ven tion s of the day t o po rtray t he female
56
Schneiders, W ri tt en T ha t Y ou M ay B el ie ve, 3 5, 1 35 . S ee a ls o h er “ Re su rr ec ti onN a rr a ti ve , ” I : 35 9 a n d T h e R ev el at or y T ex t: I nt er pr et in g t he N ew T es ta me nt a s S ac re d Scripture ( 2 n d e d n . ; C o l l e g e v il l e, M i n n .: L i t u rg i c a l P r e s s, 1999) , 1 8 7 .
57 Schneiders, W r i t t e n T h a t Y o u M a y B e l i e v e, 1 3 5 – 3 6 , 1 3 8 ; c f . C a h i l l , “ N a r r a t i v e A r t , ”4 1 – 4 8 . S e e a l so S c hn e id e rs , “ R es u rr e ct io n N a rr a ti v e, ” I : 36 0 a n d R e v e l at o r y Te x t , 1 8 7 .
58 Schneiders, W r it t en T h at Y o u M a y B e li e ve, 1 4 1 .59 S c hn e id e rs , “ R es u rr e ct i on N a rr a ti v e, ” I : 33 8 . S e e a l so h e r “ E as t er J e su s ,” 1 6 1 a n d
W r it t en T h at Y o u M a y B e li e ve, 3 5 .60 Schneiders, W r it t en T h at Y o u M a y B e li e ve, 3 5 , 1 9 5– 9 9. S e e a l so h e r “ R es u rr e ct i on
N a rr a ti ve , ” I : 33 8 , 3 9 4 – 4 3 9 a n d “ E as t er J e su s ,” 1 6 1.
12 The Bridegr oom Messiah and the People of God
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
31/193
ch aract ers i n su ch a way as to have th em s u p p or t t h e c h ar a ct e r iz a ti o n
o f J es us a s t h e m es s ia ni c b ri de gr o om .”61 T he “ li t er ar y c on ve n ti o ns o f
t he d ay ” i nclud e c ha ra ct er t y pe s , t yp e -s ce ne s, a nd t ec hn iq u es o f c ha r -
acterization.62
T h e s e c a n b e f o u n d f i r s t o f a l l i n t h e H e b r e w B i b l e , “ o n eo f t he m os t i mp or ta nt l it er ar y r es ou rc es f or und e r st a nd i n g t h e F o ur t h
G os pe l” a nd t he s o ur ce f or s ev er al a ll u si on s.63 I m p o r ta n t b a c k g ro u n d
l i te ra tu re a ls o i n cl u de s H el l en i st i c- Je wi s h w ri t in g s s uc h a s t he b o ok s
o f J ud it h an d Su sa nn a, a s we ll as p op ul ar G re co -R oma n n ov el s l ik e
Xenophon’s A n E p h e s i a n T a l e a n d C h a r iton ’ s C h a e r e a s a n d C a l l i r h o e.
Fe hr ib ac h a ls o r ef ers t o c ul tu ral co nv en ti on s, l ik e t he o per at io n o f
honor and sham e i n g end er rel at ions and th e social s ta tu s o f f ir st -
c e n t u r y w o m e n , a s r e c o n s t r u c t e d b y m o d e r n s c h o l a r s .64 S h e a r g u e s t h a t
J oh n u se s t he se l it er ar y a nd c ul tu ra l c on ve nt io ns t o p or tr ay J es us a s
t he m es si an ic b ri de gr oo m. T he m ot he r o f J es us a ct s a s t he “ mo th er o f
a n i mp or ta nt s on ” a nd M ar th a o f B et ha ny f un ct io ns a s t he m es si an ic
b ri de gr oo m ’s s is t er -i n- la w . T h e S am ar it a n w om an , M ar y o f Beth a n y ,
a nd M ar y M ag da le ne a re a ll d ep ic te d a s h is b et ro th ed o r b ri de .65
In s up po rt o f h er a rg ume nt a bo ut t he S ama ri ta n w om an , M ar y o f
B e t h a n y , a n d M a r y M a g d a l e n e , F e h r i b a c h m e n t i o n s a l l u s i o n s t o b i b l i c a lt ex ts a bo ut m ar ri ag e . S he s h ow s h ow t h e a ll u si on s i nd i ca te t h e l i te ra ry
a n d e x eg e ti c al c o nv e n ti o n s t h at J o hn u s es t o p o rt r ay f e ma l e c h ar a ct e rs .
A cc or di ng t o F eh r ib ac h, J oh n 4 :4 – 4 2 a ll ud es t o t he “ be tr ot ha l t yp e-
s c e n e ” c o n v e n tio n .66 J e s u s ’ s y m b o l i c b e t r oth a l t o t h e S a m a r i t a n w o m a n
i s f or es ha do we d b y J oh n 2 :1 –1 1 a nd 3 :2 9.67 A n a ll us io n t o S on g 1 :1 2
i n J o h n 1 2 : 3 l i k e n s M a r y o f B e t h a ny t o t h e S o n g ’ s b r i d e , c o n v e n t i o n a l l y
u nd er st oo d a s t he p eo pl e o f G od .68 A n a l l u s i o n t o S o n g 3 : 1 – 4 i n J o h n
2 0: 1– 18 a ll ow s M ar y M ag da le ne t o a ss um e th e c on ve nt io na l r ol e o f t h e w o m a n i n s e a r c h o f h e r d e a d l o v e r ’ s b o d y .69 J o hn ’ s f e ma l e c h ar a c-
t er s b ec om e p ar ad ig ms o f f ai th b ec au se t he y r ep re se nt th e b el i ev i ng
c om mu ni ty , a s d o c ha ra ct er s l ik e J ud it h a nd S us an na .70 A pa rt f ro m
t he ir r ep re se nt at iv e f un ct io n, h ow ev er , t he y a re m ar gi na li ze d. T he y
suffer t he fate of all w om en i n t he p at ri ar ch al s oc ie ty t ha t p ro du ce d
t he F ou rt h G os pe l.71 F eh ri ba ch l am en ts t he f ac t t ha t h er h is to ri ca l-
li terary analysi s offers so l itt le hope to her femi nist read ers . She
61 Adeline Fehribach, T h e W o m e n i n t h e L i f e o f t h e B r i d e g r o o m : A F e m i n i s t H i s t o r i c a l - Literary Analysis of the Female Characters in the Fourth Gospel ( C o l l e g ev i l le , M i n n .:
Liturgical Press, 1998) , 2 0 .62 Ibid., 7 – 8 . 63 Ibid., 9 – 1 0 . 64 Ibid., 1 0 – 1 7 .65 Ibid., 2 0 . 66 Ibid., 4 9 –5 2 . 67 Ibid., 4 7– 49 .68 Ibid., 9 3 . 69 Ibid., 1 50 , 1 60 . 70 Ibid., 1 06 – 7, 1 75 –7 8.71 Ibid., 3 2– 4 2, 6 9– 79 , 1 07 –1 1, 1 40 – 4 1.
Allusions to biblical texts about marriage 13
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
32/193
s ug ge st s t h at a r ea d er -r es p on s e a pp ro ac h o r a p er fo rm at i ve f ai t h p er s-
p e ct i v e m i gh t e n ab l e i n t er p re t ers t o v ie w J oh n’ s f em al e c ha ra ct er s a s
a s s e rtiv e , c o u r a g eo u s d is c ip les .72
A l t h o u g h F e h r i b a c h p r o v i d e s a d e t a i l e d t r e a t m e n t o f m a r r i a g e t h e m e si n J oh n 4 :4 – 4 2, 1 2: 1– 8, a nd 2 0: 1– 18 , h er c hi ef c on ce rn i s w it h J oh n’ s
s im il ar it ie s t o p op ul ar G re co -R om an n ov el s a nd c on fo rm it y t o f ir st -
c e n t u r y c u l t u r a l c o n v e n t i o n s . S h e p a y s s c a n t a t t e n t i o n ( f e w e r t h a n s e v e n
p ag es ) t o J oh n’ s s cr ip tu ra l a ll us i on s. F or t he m os t s us t ai n ed t re at m en t
t o d at e o f J oh n’ s a ll us io ns t o b ib li ca l t ex ts a bo ut m ar ri ag e, w e mu st
r ef er t o W in so r’ s b oo k, A King Is Bound in the Tr ess es.73 Winsor
c on ce nt ra te s h ea vi ly o n t he ir n at ur e a nd s ig ni fi ca nc e – a t l ea st w it h
r e s p e c t t o a l l u s i o n s t o t h e S o n g o f S o n g s i n J o h n 1 2 a n d 2 0 . S h e a p p l i e s
t he t h eo ri e s o f R if fa te rr e a nd B en - Po ra t i n i d en t if yi ng a nd i nt er p re ti ng
t he m, a nd s he s ug ge st s h ow t he y m ig ht h av e f ou nd t he ir w ay i nt o t he
narrative.
W i ns or ’s a ns we r s f ai l t o s at i sf y, h o we ve r . F or o ne t hi n g, h er m et h od
d oe s n ot g en er at e c on si st en tl y c om pe ll in g c on cl us io ns . S om e o f h er
pro posed allu si on s are based onl y o n a remot e si mi lar ity . Joh n’s
mnZmei
on s ca rc el y r es em b le s t he S on g ’s tami* eion, J oh n’ s r ef er en cet o J es u s’ f ee t h ar dl y e ch oe s t he S on g ’s d es cr i pt io n s o f f em al e f ee t, a nd
t he s up p os ed c or ru p ti o n o f tZ
B s ta kt Z
B to pistikZ
B i s p ur e s pe cu l a-
t io n. F ur th er mo re , a ll b ut s ix o f h er p ro po se d a ll us iv e l in ks c on si st o f
o nl y o n e v er ba l s im i la ri t y, s uc h a s “ fe et ” o r “ sc en t .” T h is w ea k en s h er
a rg um en t t ha t J oh n 1 2: 1– 3 a nd 2 0: 1, 1 1– 18 a ll ud e t o t he e nt ir e S on g
o f So ng s. T hi rt ee n J oh an ni ne w or ds o r i de as w it h o nl y a bo ut s ix ty
p ar al le ls i n t he S on g ( in cl ud in g t hi rt y- on e r ef er en ce s t o s ce nt a lo ne )
h a r d l y c o n s t i t u t e a n a l l u s i o n t o a p o e m o f n e a r l y t w o t h o u s a n d w o r d s ( i nG re ek ). P ut a no t he r w ay , J oh n ’s a no i nt i ng a nd r es u rr ec ti on s ce ne s d o
not readily evoke the Son g as a wh ole, with its pasto ra l setti ngs,
w e d d i n g p r o c e s s i o n s , a n d m e t a p h o r i c a l d e s c r i p t i o n s o f t h e h u m a n b o d y .
Scat tered v erbal an d themati c si mi lari ti es al on g with a coupl e of
“ u ng r am m at i ca l i ti e s ” p r ov e t o b e i n s uf f ic i en t i n di c a to r s. M o re c r it e ri a
a r e n e ed e d.
M o r e c r i t e r i a a r e p r o v i d e d b y R i c h a r d B . H a y s . I n h i s b o o k E c h o e s o f
S cr ip tu re i n t he L et te rs o f P au l, H ay s l i st s s ev en g ui d el i ne s f or i d en t i-
f yi ng a nd i nt er pr et in g P au l’ s a ll us io ns t o S cr ip tu re .74 L ik e W in s or ,
72 Ibid., 1 7 5– 8 4.73 F or a s um ma ry o f W in so r’ s a rg um en t, s ee a bo ve , p p. 9 – 10 .74 R ic ha rd B . H ay s, E ch oe s o f S cr ip tu re i n t he L et te rs o f P au l ( Ne w H av en : Y al e
Un i v er s it y P r e ss , 1989) , 2 9 –3 2 .
14 The Bridegr oom Messiah and the People of God
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
33/193
H ay s c on si de rs v er ba l p ar al le ls b et we en t he o ri gi na ti ng t ex t a nd t he
ev oked text as well as the sig n ificance of th e evoked tex t for the
a ll ud in g a ut ho r. U nl ik e W in so r, H ay s a ls o s tr es se s t he f re qu en cy o f
v erb al p ar al le ls a nd t he r het or ic al e mp has is l ai d o n t he a ll us io n. I nad di ti on , Ha ys ’ g ui del in es a ss es s t he i mp ac t o f t he a ll us io n o n t he
o ri gi n at i ng t ex t, a cc ou n t f or t h e p l au si b il i ty o f t he a ll u si on i n i t s h is t or -
i ca l c on te xt , a nd e va lu at e i ts r ec ep ti on b y a c on te mp or ar y a ud ie nc e.
A lt ho ug h t he y w er e c om pi le d f or u nd er st an di ng a ll us io ns i n P au l’ s
e pi st le s, t he y c an b e e as il y a da pt ed f or u se w it h t he F ou rt h G os pe l.
In this stu d y, I adapt and then adopt Hays’ criteria in ord er to
i nv es ti ga te p os si bl e a ll us io ns t o m ar ri ag e t ex ts i n J oh n t he B ap ti st ’s
b ri de gr oo m s ay i ng ( Jo hn 3 :2 9 ), t he S am ar i ta n s to ry ( Jo hn 4 : 4 – 4 2) , t he
a no in ti ng s ce ne ( 12 :1 –8 ), a nd t he r es ur re ct io n a pp ea ra nc e t o M ar y
M ag da le ne ( 20 :1 –1 8) . M y f ir st c on ce rn i s w it h J oh n’ s a ll us io ns a s a n
a c t o f c o m m u n i c a t i o n b e t w e e n a n i m p l i e d a u t h o r a n d i m p l i e d a u d i e n c e .
A s to ry ’s i mp li ed a ut ho r i s t he au th or ’s p er so na as p ro je ct ed i n t he
t ex t. I ts i mp li ed au di en ce co ns is ts o f t ho se ex pec te d t o u nd er st an d
t h e stor y, i nc lu d in g i t s d ir e ct d i sc ou rs e a s w el l a s i t s i mp li ci t c om me n -
tary.
75
S in ce b ot h i mp li ed a ut ho r a nd i mp li ed a ud ie nc e m us t b e c on -s tr uc te d p ri mar il y o n t he b as is o f e vi de nc e fr om t he t ex t, I f oc us m y
i ni t ia l i n ve st ig at i on o n t h e t ex t o f t h e F ou rt h G os p el w it h ou t c on si d er -
i ng o th er l it er ar y o r h is to ri ca l s ou rc es . W he n I a pp ly H ay s’ c ri te ri a t o
J oh n’ s n ar ra ti ve , f ou r a ll us io ns a re c on fi rm ed : J er . 3 3: 10 – 11 i n J oh n
3 :2 9, G en . 2 9: 1– 20 i n J oh n 4 :4 – 4 2, So ng 1 :1 2 i n J oh n 1 2: 3, a nd So ng
3 :1 – 4 i n J oh n 2 0: 1– 18 .
A l it era ry a na ly si s i n a cc or da nc e w it h H ay s’ c ri te ri a s ho ws t ha t
J oh n’ s i mp li ed a ut ho r u se s e ac h a ll us io n t o d ev el op a m ar ri ag e m et a-p ho r d es cr i bi n g J es us a s t he M es s ia h a nd d ep i ct i ng J es us ’ r el at i on s hi p
w it h t he b el ie vi ng c om mu ni ty . I n J oh n 3 :2 2– 30 , J er . 3 3: 10 – 11 h el ps
t o c ha ra ct er iz e J es us a s a b ri de gr oo m- Me ss ia h w ho i ns pi re s j oy a nd
w ho se p ro gen y w il l i ncr eas e. T he a ll us io n t o G en . 2 9: 1– 20 i n J oh n
4:4 – 42 ill us trates t he orig in of th is famil y o f fait h. Her e, Jesus is
p or tr ay ed a s a b ri de gr oo m g re at er t ha n J ac ob w ho o ff er s e te rn al l if e,
a nd t he S am ar it an w om an a s t he b ri de w ho se t es ti mo ny c au se s m an y
o f h er fe ll ow -ci ti ze ns t o b el iev e. I n J oh n 1 2: 1– 8, S on g 1 :1 2 d ep ic ts
75 T he c on ce pt o f i mp li ed a ut ho r a nd a ud ie nc e i s b or ro we d f ro m W ay ne B oo th (The Rhetoric of Fiction [ C hi c a g o: Un i v e rs i t y o f C h i c ag o P r e s s, 1961] , 7 0 – 7 1 ), a s e la bo ra te d
b y S ey mo ur C ha tm an (S to ry a nd D is co ur se : N ar ra ti ve S tr uc tu re i n F ic ti on a nd F il m[ I th a ca , N . Y. : C o rn e ll U n iv e rs i ty P r es s , 1978] , 1 48 –5 1, 2 67 ) a nd C ul pe pp er ( Anatomy,6 – 8) . I u se t he t er m “ im pl ie d a ud ie nc e” i ns te ad o f “ im pl ie d r ea de r” b ec au se J oh n a dd re ss esa g r o u p o f p e o p l e , a s i n d i c a t e d b y t h e s e c o n d - p e r s o n p l u r a l p r o n o u n i n J o h n 2 0 : 3 1 .
Allusions to biblical texts about marriage 15
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
34/193
J es us as t he k in g o n t he c ou ch e ve n a s h e co nt emp la tes h is i mmi ne nt
cr uc if ix io n. F in al ly , t he s ea rc h o f t he b ri de fo r h er b el ov ed i n So ng
3 :1 – 4 p ro v id es a f or ma t f or M ar y M ag da l en e’ s r ec o gn i ti o n o f t he r is en
a n d a s ce n d in g L o rd .T hi s i nt er pr et at io n r ai se s a q ue st io n a dd re ss ed b y m an y p re vi ou s
e xe ge te s: d oe s J oh n’ s c as ti ng f em al e c ha ra ct er s i n t he r ol e o f b ri de s
i nd i ca te t ha t t h ey a re r ep re se n ta t iv e f ig u re s? S p ec if ic al ly , d o t he b ri d e
of John 3:29, t he Sa mari tan woman, Mary of Bethan y, and Mary
M a g d a l e n e s y m b o l i z e t h e p e o p l e o f G o d ?76 T h i s i s s u e c a n b e a d d r e s s e d
w it h t he h el p o f s om e r ec en tl y d ev el op ed g ui de li ne s f or i de nt if yi ng
a nd i nt er pr et in g J oh n’ s s ym bo ls . C ra ig R . K oe st er d ev ot es a n e nt ir e
c ha pt er o f h is b oo k, S ym bo li s m i n t he F o ur t h G os p el, t o s ym bo li c a nd
r e p r es e n ta tiv e f ig u r es .77 A cc or di ng t o K oe st e r, m an y o f J oh n ’s c ha ra c-
t er s c an f un ct io n n ot o nl y a s i nd iv id ua ls i n t he ir o wn r ig ht b ut a ls o a s
r e pr e se n ta t i ve s o f p a rt i c ul a r g r ou p s o f p e op l e. E s pe c ia l l y p e rt i n en t a r e
K oe st er ’s i ns ig ht s i nt o t ec hn iq ue s b y w hi ch J oh n i mp ar ts s ym bo li c
v al u e. F or e xa mp l e, J oh n m i gh t d ir ec tl y i d en t if y i nd i vi d ua l c ha ra ct er s
wi th a c er ta in g ro up , en do w t he m w it h t he d is ti nc ti ve t ra it s o f t hat
g ro u p, o r r ef er t o t h em w it h p l ur al p ro n ou n s.
78
A s I i nv es ti ga te J oh n’ s a ll us io ns t o m ar ri ag e t ex ts , t he n, I a ls o e x-
p lo re h ow t he G os pe l i nc or po ra te s t he se a nd o th er t ec hn iq ue s t o l en d
v ar io us d eg re es o f r ep re se nt at iv e v al ue t o t he w om en w ho a ss um e t he
rol e of the bri de. In t he proces s, I am careful to d isti ngui sh among
d if fer en t au di en ce s. T her e i s n o ex pl ic it e vi de nc e i n t he G os pe l t o
s ug ge st t ha t i ts i mp li ed a ud ien ce wo ul d h av e u nd er st oo d e it he r t he
b r i d e o f J o h n 3 : 2 9 o r M a r y o f B e t h a n y i n J o h n 1 2 : 1 – 8 a s a r e p r e s e n t a -
t iv e f ig ur e. T her e i s, h ow ev er , s om e i nd ic at io n t ha t t he Sa ma ri tanwo ma n s ym bo li ze s t he Sa mar it an p eo pl e an d t hat M ar y M ag da lene
e xe mp li fi es J es us ’ f ol lo we rs a s d es cr ib ed e ls ew he re i n t he G os pe l.79
M o re o ve r , h i s to r i ca l e v id e nc e s h ow s t h a t J o h n’ s o r i gi n a l a u di e nc e m a y
h av e a tt ri bu te d e ve n m or e r ep re se nt at iv e v al ue t o t he se f ou r f em al e
76 S ch ol ar s w ho r ai se t hi s q ue st io n i nc lu de B ra un ( Jean le théologien 3.1, 9 3– 95 ),
B o is m ar d ( “ Ae n on p r e`
s d e S ale m, ” 2 25 ), G ir ar d ( “J e´
s us e n S am ar ie ,” 3 04 ), N ey re y( “ Ja c ob T r ad i ti o ns ,” 4 2 5– 2 6) , J a ub e rt ( “ Sy m bo l iq u e d u p u it s ,” 6 3 –7 3 a n d “ S ym b ol i qu ed e s f e m m e s , ” 1 1 8 – 1 9 ) , C a m b e ( “ I n f l u e n c e d u C a n t i q u e , ” 2 5 ) , a n d F e u i l l e t ( “ R e c h e r c h e d uC h ri s t, ” 1 0 3– 7 a n d Myster e d e l ’a mo ur d iv in, 2 31 ), a s w el l a s F eh ri ba ch , S ch ne id er s,B a ri l , a n d O r ig e n.
77 C r ai g R . K o es t er , S ym b ol i sm i n t h e F o ur t h G o sp e l (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1995),32–73.
78 Ibid., 3 5 –3 6 .79 K oe st er r ea ch es si mi la r co nc lu sio ns a bo ut th e S am ari ta n w om an a nd Ma ry
M a g d al e n e ( i b id . , 4 8 – 5 1, 6 9 – 7 0) .
16 The Bridegr oom Messiah and the People of God
8/9/2019 Bridegroom in the 4th Gospel
35/193
c ha ra ct er s – r ep re se nt at iv e v al ue a ls o r ec og ni ze d b y c on te mp or ar y
au di en ce s f ami li ar wi th c on ve nt io ns w her eb y b ri des r ep res en t t he
p eo pl e o f G od .
T hi s c al l s i nt o q ue st i on W in s or ’s p ro po s al t h at t h e G os p el a ll u de s t ot he So ng o f So ng s b eca us e t he J oh an ni ne t ra di ti on v al ue s w om en ’s
e x p e r i e n c e . I n l i g h t o f t h e w o m e n ’ s r o l e s a s b r i d e s , i t s e e m s m o r e l i k e l y
t ha t t he s ig ni fi ca nc e o f J oh n’ s a ll us io ns t o m ar ri ag e t ex ts l ie s i n t he ir
co nt ri bu ti on t o s om e o th er as pe ct o f J oh n’s m es sa ge . I n t hi s s tu dy ,
I i nv es ti gat e t he p os si bi li ty t hat t he y h el p t o a dv an ce t he G os pe l’ s
c en tr al a im , “ th at y ou m ay c om e t o b el ie ve t ha t J es us i s t he M es si ah ,
the Son of Go d, and th at t hr ou gh b el ie vi ng y ou m ay h av e l ife i n h is
n a me ” ( J oh n 2 0 :3 1 ).80
T ha t W in so r n ev er c on si d er s t hi s p os si b il i ty i s p er ha ps u nd er s ta nd -
a bl e, s in ce J oh n’ s c on ce rn w it h b el ie f t ha t J es us i s t he M es si ah i s n ot
r ea di ly a pp are nt e it her i n t he a no in ti ng s to ry o r i n t he r es ur re ct io n
a p p e a r a n c e ( t h e t w o p
Recommended