View
240
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
7/30/2019 Chapter 1 Errors in Chemical Analysis
1/23
Errors in Chemical Analysis
Lecture 1
7/30/2019 Chapter 1 Errors in Chemical Analysis
2/23
Data quality Measurements invariably involve errors and
uncertainties. Uncertainties can never be completely eliminated,measurement data can give us only an estimate ofthe truevalue.
Reliability can be assessed in several ways: Experiments designed to reveal the presence oferrors
Compared with the known compositions
Consult to the chemical literature Equipment Calibration Statistical tests
7/30/2019 Chapter 1 Errors in Chemical Analysis
3/23
Representative Data Chemists usually carry two to five portions
(replicates) of a sample through an entireanalytical procedure. Replicates are samples of about the same size that
are carried through an analysis in exactly the sameway.
One usually considers the bestestimate to bethe central value for the set: Usually, the mean or the median is used as the
central value for a set of replicate measurements. The variation in data allows us to estimate the
uncertainty associated with the central result
7/30/2019 Chapter 1 Errors in Chemical Analysis
4/23
The Mean and Median The most widely used measure of central value
is the mean, . The mean, also called thearithmetic mean, or the average,
where xi represents the individual values ofx makingup the set ofN replicate measurements.
The median is the middle result when replicatedata are arranged according to increasing or
decreasing value.
7/30/2019 Chapter 1 Errors in Chemical Analysis
5/23
EXAMPLE 5-1
Calculate the mean and median for thedata shown in Figure 5-1.
Because the set contains an evennumber of measurements, the median
is the average of the central pair:
7/30/2019 Chapter 1 Errors in Chemical Analysis
6/23
Precision Describes the reproducibility of measurements
Or, the closeness of results that have beenobtained in exactly the same way.
Three terms are widely used to describe the
precision of a set of replicate data: standard deviation;
variance;
coefficient of variation.
Deviation from the mean:
7/30/2019 Chapter 1 Errors in Chemical Analysis
7/23
Accuracy Indicates the closeness of the measurement to
the true or accepted value Expressed in terms of either absolute or relative
error.
Absolute error: where xt is the true or accepted value of the quantity
We retain the sign in stating the absolute error.
Relative error:
7/30/2019 Chapter 1 Errors in Chemical Analysis
8/23
The difference between accuracy and precision
7/30/2019 Chapter 1 Errors in Chemical Analysis
9/23
Types of Errors in Experimental Data
The precision of a measurement is readily
determined by comparing data fromcarefully replicated experiments.
To determine the accuracy, we have toknow the true value, which is usually whatwe are seeking in the analysis.
7/30/2019 Chapter 1 Errors in Chemical Analysis
10/23
Analyst 1: relatively high precision & high accuracy Analyst 2: poor precision but good accuracy
Analyst 3: excellent precision & significant error in thenumerical average for the data
Analyst 4: poor precision & poor accuracy
7/30/2019 Chapter 1 Errors in Chemical Analysis
11/23
Types of Errors Random(or indeterminate) error:
Affect measurement precision Causes data to be scattered more or less
symmetrically around a mean value. Analysts 1 and 3 is significantly less than that for analysts 2
and 4.
Systematic (or determinate) error: Affect the accuracy of results
Causes the mean of a data set to differ from theaccepted value. Analysts 1 and 2 have little systematic error;
Analysts 3 and 4 show systematic errors of about -0.7% and-1.2%.
7/30/2019 Chapter 1 Errors in Chemical Analysis
12/23
Gross error:
Often the product of human errors.
usually occur only occasionally, are often large, andmay cause a result to be either high or low.
lead to outliers, results that appear to differ markedlyfrom all other data in a set of replicate measurements.
7/30/2019 Chapter 1 Errors in Chemical Analysis
13/23
7/30/2019 Chapter 1 Errors in Chemical Analysis
14/23
Instrument Errors All measuring devices are potential
sources of systematic errors. Calibration eliminates most instrumental
systematic errors.
Electronic instruments are subject toinstrumental systematic errors. Ex: low battery voltage, noises
In many cases, errors of these types aredetectable and correctable.
7/30/2019 Chapter 1 Errors in Chemical Analysis
15/23
Method Errors The nonideal chemical or physical behavior of
the reagents and reactions on which an analysisis based
Ex: the slowness of some reactions, the
incompleteness of others, the instability of somespecies
Errors inherent in a method are often difficult to
detectand are thus the most serious of the threetypes of systematic error.
7/30/2019 Chapter 1 Errors in Chemical Analysis
16/23
Personal Errors Many measurements require personal
judgments. J udgments of this type are oftensubject to systematic, undirectional errors.
Analytical procedures should always be adjustedso that any known physical limitations of theanalyst cause negligibly small errors.
A universal source of personal error is prejudice,or bias. Number bias is another source of
personal error that varies considerably fromperson to person.
7/30/2019 Chapter 1 Errors in Chemical Analysis
17/23
Effect of Systematic Errors on
Analytical Results Systematic errors may be either constant or
proportional. Constant errors
Independent of the size of the sample being analyzed.
The absolute error is constant with sample size, butthe relative error varies when sample size is changed.
The excess of reagent required to bring about a color
change during a titration is an example. The effect of a constant error becomes more serious
as the size of the quantity measured decreases.
7/30/2019 Chapter 1 Errors in Chemical Analysis
18/23
Proportional errors
Decrease or increase in proportion to the sizeof the sample.
The absolute error varies with sample size,
but the relative error stays constant withchanging sample size.
A common cause of proportional errors is thepresence of interfering contaminants in thesample.
7/30/2019 Chapter 1 Errors in Chemical Analysis
19/23
Systematic Instrument and
Personal Errors Detection Instrument errors
Some systematic instrument errors can be found andcorrected by calibration.
Periodic calibration of equipment is always desirablebecause the response of most instruments change
with time as a result of wear, corrosion, ormistreatment.
Personal errors
Most personal errors can be minimized by care andself-discipline.
It is a good habit to check instrument readings,notebook entries, and calculations systematically.
7/30/2019 Chapter 1 Errors in Chemical Analysis
20/23
Systematic Method Errors Detection
Take one or more of the following
steps to recognise and adjust for asystematic error:
Analysis of Standard Samples Independent Analysis
Blank Determinations Variation in Sample Size
7/30/2019 Chapter 1 Errors in Chemical Analysis
21/23
Analysis of Standard Samples The best way of estimating the bias of an
analytical method is by the analysis ofstandard reference materials. Standard Reference Materials (SRMS):
Materials that contain one or more analytes atknown concentration levels.
Can sometimes be prepared by synthesis.
Can be purchased from a number of governmentaland industrial sources. Ex: National Institute ofStandards and Technology (NIST); SigmaChemical Co.
7/30/2019 Chapter 1 Errors in Chemical Analysis
22/23
7/30/2019 Chapter 1 Errors in Chemical Analysis
23/23
Recommended