View
238
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
7/29/2019 Chapter 3 Overheads Final
1/29
1
CHAPTER 3
OVERHEADS
Overheads are costs, which are not traced directly to cost units. In other words, overhead
is the total of indirect material costs, indirect labour costs, and indirect expenses. The
terms burden, supplementary costs, on costs and indirect expenses are used
interchangeably for overhead. Overheads are aggregated under some account head (e.g.
supervisors salary, office lighting, depreciation, and building up keep) and then assigned
to cost units on some equitable basis.
Overheads are usually classified in terms of functions: factory overhead, administration
overhead, selling overhead, and distribution overhead. The terms factory overhead,
manufacturing overhead and production overhead are used interchangeably.
Manufacturing overheads
Manufacturing overheads are indirect costs associated with the manufacturing process. In
a product manufacturing set up manufacturing process is the sequence of operations that
begin with supplying materials to work stations and end with the primary packing of the
product. In the context of producing services, the manufacturing process is the process of
performing activities, concurrently or in sequence, which are directly related to creating
the service. For example, in the context of an organisation providing road transportservices, manufacturing overheads are overheads associated with the operation of the
vehicles. Indirect costs incurred in stores department and in departments providing
support services are also included in manufacturing overhead.
Administration overheads
Administration overheads are costs of formulating the policy, directing the organization
and controlling the operations which are not directly related to production, selling,
distribution and research or development or any other function.
Cost of factory administration is a part of manufacturing overhead. Similarly, the cost of
administration of marketing offices is a part of selling overhead.
Selling overheads
Selling overheads are costs associated with marketing and selling (excluding distribution)
activities.
7/29/2019 Chapter 3 Overheads Final
2/29
2
Distribution overheads
Distribution overheads are costs associated with the distribution of finished products.
Distribution includes such activities as moving finished goods to central or local storage,
moving finished goods to and from prospective customers as in case of goods on sale or
return basis. In gas, electricity and water industries, distribution means pipes, mains and
services which may be regarded as equivalent to packing and transportation.
3.1 ACCOUNTING FOR MANUFACTURING OVERHEADS
Manufacturing overheads form part of the product cost. Accounting for manufacturing
overheads aims to equitably assign overheads to units produced during a period.
Overheads for a period are aggregated and then assigned to units produced using a
method that reasonably captures the demand of the units on resources represented by
overheads. Usually, an average rate per unit is calculated and the same is applied to
assign overheads to units produced. Overheads are aggregated at the cost centre level and
average rate is calculated for each cost centre because the incidence of cost is different at
different cost centres and different products consume varying amount of resources at each
cost centre.
Conventional method for assigning overheads to units produced during the period
involves the following four steps:
Allocation
Apportionment
Reapportionment
Absorption
7/29/2019 Chapter 3 Overheads Final
3/29
3
Total overheads for a particular period are collected under production cost centres and
separate overhead absorption rates are used for different production cost centres. This is a
refinement over the earlier practice of using a single absorption rate for the
factory/facility. In past, most firms used to produce a single product or similar products,
and the demand used to be created by each unit of such products on resources represented
by fixed factory overheads did not vary significantly. Consequently, use of the blanket
rate did not impair the product cost. Firms felt the need for refinement when they added
different types of products which either do not use the resources of all the cost centres or
the time spent by them in a particular cost centre is not uniform.
The conventional method required further refinement because it fails to produce result
with desired accuracy for firms that produce variety of products using the same facility in
situations where the amount of resources consumed by a unit in a particular cost centre
does not depend on the time spent by it in the cost centre.. Activity based costing (ABC)
method, which is a refinement over the conventional method, provides result with much
higher accuracy than that obtained by using the conventional method.
We shall discuss the ABC method in chapter 14.
3.1.1 Allocation
Overheads that can be identified to a cost centre are assigned to the cost centre. For
correct allocation of factory overheads, source document which is used for collection of
overheads must clearly indicate the cost centre which has received the benefit from the
expenses covered under the document. Notification of account-headings (standing order
number) and cost centres is essential for allocating factory overheads to various cost
centres. Examples of overheads that can be identified with cost centres are: depreciation,
insurance, and repair and maintenance of equipment located in different cost centres,
remuneration to supervisors and indirect workers dedicated to different cost centres, and
power (if separate meters are installed in different cost centres).
3.1.2 Apportionment
Apportionment refers to proportionate allotment of overheads common to various cost
centres to those cost centres on some equitable basis. Examples of common overheads
are: rent, rates, depreciation, repairs and maintenance of the building in which cost-
7/29/2019 Chapter 3 Overheads Final
4/29
4
centres are located, lighting of the premises, works-managers salary, medical directors
salary in a hospital, and managing partners salary in an accounting firm.
Allocation of directly identifiable items and apportionment of common items of factory
overheads result in collection of total factory overheads under various cost centres,
including support-service cost centres.
The following are some of the common bases used for measurement of benefits:
Basis Cost item
Floor area Rent, rates, depreciation, maintenance of building and other
expenses connected with the premises; lighting and heating (if a
better basis is not available); fire protection service, etc.
Number of employees Any expense associated with employees, such as canteen
expenses, recreation expenses, timekeeping, supervision, etc.
Value of materials
passing through
cost centres
Expenses associated with material such as material
handling expenses
Capital values Depreciation, insurance and maintenance of production
facilities
Direct labour hours
and/or machine hours
Majority of general overhead items
Technical estimates (a)Lighting: capacity of lighting or number of lights
(b)Electric power: horse power of machines coupled with
operating time
(c)Steam
(d)Water.
Two secondary criteria, other than the proportionate benefit, which are sometimes used
for apportionment of factory overheads, are as follows:
(a) Ability to pay. One of the accepted principles of taxation is what the traffic will
bear. This principle is sometimes applied in cost accounting for cost apportionment. For
example, sales office expenses may be apportioned to various product groups on the basis
of sale value. The assumption is that a product with a higher sale value can bear a higher
7/29/2019 Chapter 3 Overheads Final
5/29
5
burden of sales expenses, although actual efforts involved in selling an easy selling line
but having higher sales must be lower as compared to the effort involved in other product
lines having a lower sales value.
(b) Efficiency or incentives. In some organizations, overheads are apportioned on the
basis of a predetermined activity level (often budgeted production or sales level). If actual
performance exceeds the predetermined level, average per unit overhead cost would be
lower as compared to predetermined rate while failure to achieve the predetermined
activity level would result in a higher average per unit overhead cost. This provides an
incentive for better performance.
3.1.3 Re-apportionment
Overheads of service cost centres are reapportioned to other cost centres based on the
proportionate benefit derived by those cost centres. The following are some of the most
apparent bases for reapportionment:
Basis Cost centres
Number of employee Canteen, welfare and recreation centres, timeoffice
Value of material used or
requisitioned
Stores and internal transport
Capital value (This basis is likely to
give inaccurate results. A moreappropriate basis would be the
actual maintenance hours and the
actual issue of spares.)
Maintenance
Technical estimates Tool roomFloor area Building service
Energy/power consumed Boiler house and power house
Usually technical estimates are used to reapportion overheads assigned to support-service
cost centres to production cost centres, because, often it is difficult to identify appropriate
criteria for reapportioning service cost centre overheads.
One of the following methods is used to reapportion overheads of service cost centres to
production cost centres:
(a) Direct redistribution method
(b) Step distribution method
7/29/2019 Chapter 3 Overheads Final
6/29
6
(c) Reciprocal services method.
Direct redistribution method
A service cost centre renders services to production cost centres as well as to other
service cost centres. This method ignores the services rendered by one service cost centre
to other service cost centres. Service cost centre overheads are apportioned to production
cost centres in the ratio of benefits received by them. This is a simple, but an inaccurate
method.
Illustration 3.1
Maria Limited (ML) has three production centres, A, B and C and two service cost
centres, X and Y. Costs allocated to service centres are required to be apportioned to the
production centres to find out cost of production of different products. It is found that
benefit of service cost centres is also received by each other along with the production
cost centres.
Overheads as allocated to the five cost centres and estimates of benefit of service cost
centres received by each of them are as under:
Cost
centres
Overheads as allocated
(CU)
Estimates of benefits received by other cost
centres (%)
X Y
A 80,000 20 20
B 40,000 30 25
C 20,000 40 50
X 20,000 5
Y 10,000 10
Required: Work out final overhead of each of the production departments including
reapportioned overheads of service centres using direct redistribution method.(Adapted, ICWA, Inter)
Solution
Total overhead accumulated under the cost centre X is to be distributed to A, B and C in
the ratio of 2:3:4. Similarly, total overhead accumulated under the cost centre Y is to be
distributed to A, B and C in the ratio of 2:2.5:5. Calculations are shown below:
7/29/2019 Chapter 3 Overheads Final
7/29
7
Cost
centres
Overheads
allocated and
apportioned(CU)
Reapportionment
of Xs overhead (CU)
Reapportionment of Ys
overhead (CU)
A 80,000 20,000 (2/9) = 4,444 10,000 (2/9.5) = 2,105
B 40,000 20,000 (3/9) = 6,667 10,000 (2.5/9.5) = 2,632
C 20,000 20,000 (4/9) = 8,889 10,000 (5/9.5) = 5,263
The final overhead of production cost centres are as follows:
A: CU 80,000 + 4,444 + 2,105 = CU 86,549
B: CU 40,000 +6,667 + 2,632 = CU 49,299
A: CU 20,000 + 8,889 + 5,263 = CU 34,152
Step distribution method
Under this method service cost centres are ranked in order of the magnitude of overhead
to be reapportioned. Sometimes, support-service cost centres are ranked on the basis of
the number of service cost centres to whom services have been rendered by the particular
service cost centre.
Overhead of the support-service cost centre, which is ranked first, is reapportioned to all
other cost centres including service cost centres. The overhead of the service cost centre
ranked second would then be reapportioned to all other cost centres except to the service
cost centre ranked first. In this manner, overhead of a service cost centre would bereapportioned to all cost centres including service cost centres ranked lower to that
service cost centre. This method provides more accurate results as compared to the direct
redistribution method. However, it often fails to provide the desired result, because in
reapportioning the overhead of a particular support-service cost centre, support-service
cost centres ranked higher are ignored.
Illustration 3.2
Based on the information provided in illustration 3.1, work out final overhead of each of
the production departments, including reapportioned overheads of service centres using
step redistribution method.
Solution
Overheads as allocated to the five cost centres and estimates of benefit of service cost
centres received by each of them are as under:
7/29/2019 Chapter 3 Overheads Final
8/29
8
Cost
centres
Overheads as allocated
(CU)
Estimates pf benefits received by other cost
centres (%)
X Y
A 80,000 20 20
B 40,000 30 25
C 20,000 40 50
X 20,000 5
Y 10,000 10
Based on the magnitude of overhead, service centre X is ranked I and Y is ranked II.
Therefore, we allocate the overhead of the service centre X to A, B, C and Y as per
calculations below:
A: CU 20,000 (2/10) = CU 4,000
B: CU 20,000 (3/10) = CU 6,000
C: CU 20,000 (4/10) = CU 8,000
Y: CU 20,000 (1/10) = CU 2,000
The total overhead of Y, including reapportioned overhead of X is CU 12,000. In
reapportioning overhead of Y, we shall ignore the service received by X from Y, because,
X is ranked higher than Y. The following are the calculations:
A: CU 12,000 (2/9.5) = CU 2,526
B: CU 12,000 (2.5/9.5) = CU 3,158
C: CU 12,000 (5/9.5) = CU 6,316
The final overhead of production cost centres are as follows:
A: CU 80,000 + 4,000 + 2,526 = CU 86,526
B: CU 40,000 +6,000 + 3,158 = CU 49,158
A: CU 20,000 + 8,000 + 6,316 = CU 34,316
Reciprocal service method
This is the most accurate method because it recognises and gives due weightage to inter
service transfers. The following methods deal with reciprocal services:
(i) Simultaneous equation method
(ii) Repeated distribution method
(iii) Trial and error method
7/29/2019 Chapter 3 Overheads Final
9/29
9
Simultaneous equation method
There are two steps in this method. First, overheads of service cost centres are ascertained
using simultaneous equation method; and second, overheads collected under service cost
centres are reapportioned to production cost centres on the basis of certain predetermined
percentages.
Repeated distribution method
Simultaneous equation method can get quite complicated if there are several service cost
centres. Repeated distribution method is the easiest to follow. Under this method,
overheads of service cost centres are reapportioned to other service and production cost
centres on the basis of predetermined percentages. The process continues until the figures
under service cost centres either get exhausted or become too small to be of any
consequence.
Trial and error method
Under this method, the first step is to ascertain overheads of service cost centres by
repeated distribution method. The second step is to reapportion the total overheads of
service cost centres to the production cost centres on the basis of predetermined
percentages.
Illustration 3.3
Based on the information provided in illustration 3.1, work out final overhead costs of
each of the production departments including reapportioned cost of service centres using
(a) continuous distribution method and
(b) simultaneous equation method.
Solution
Overheads as allocated to the five cost centres and estimates of benefit of service cost
centres received by each of them are as under:
Cost
centres
Overheads as allocated
(CU)
Estimates pf benefits received by other cost
centres (%)
X Y
A 80,000 20 20
B 40,000 30 25
C 20,000 40 50
7/29/2019 Chapter 3 Overheads Final
10/29
10
X 20,000 5
Y 10,000 10
(a) Continuous distribution method
A (CU) B (CU) C (CU) X (CU) Y (CU)
80,000 40,000 20,000 20,000 10,000
4,000 6,000 8,000 (20,000) 2,000
84,000 46,000 28,000 12,000
2,400 3,000 6,000 600 (12,000)
86,400 49,000 34,000 600
120 180 240 (600) 60
86,520 49,180 34,240 60
12 15 30 3 (60)
86,532 49,195 34,270 3
1 1 1 (3)*
86,533 49,196 34,271
*The amount being insignificant, it is equally distributed to production departments.
(b) Simultaneous equation method
Equations will be:
X = 20,000 + 5% of Y (1)
Y = 10,000 + 10% of X (2)
Solving equations (1) and (2) we get
X = CU 20,063; and Y = CU 12,060
Overheads of A, B and C will be as follows:
Particulars A (CU) B (CU) C (CU)
Allocated and apportioned 80,000 40,000 20,000
Share of X (Ratio 20:30:40) 4,120 6,180 8,240
Share of Y (Ratio 20:25:50) 2,412 3,015 6,030
Ad hoc of residual amount (CU 3) 1 1 1
Total 86,533 49,196 34,271
Management perspective
7/29/2019 Chapter 3 Overheads Final
11/29
11
We may compare the results obtained under different methods.
Cost centre Direct
redistribution
method
Step
redistribution
method
Continuous
distribution
method
Simultaneous
equation
method
A CU 86,549 CU 86,526 CU 86,533 CU 86,533
B 49,299 49,158 49,196 49,196
C 34,152 34,316 34,271 34,271
Considering that in our example only two service cost centres are considered and the
quantum of reciprocal services are not significant (10 % of X to Y and 5% of Y to X), the
variation in results obtained by using different methods is significant. Continuous
distribution method and simultaneous equation method give the same result. The
accuracy of those two methods is much higher than the other methods. Firms use
continuous distribution method because with the present computing power, the method is
easy to use, while the simultaneous equation method becomes complex with more than
two service centres.
3.1.4 Absorption
Commonly used methods for assigning overheads to units produced in a particular period
assume that volume is the only cost driver. In other words, they assume that the amount
of resources (represented by overheads) consumed by units produced vary in proportion
to the quantity produced during the period. Therefore, the absorption rate per unit is
calculated by dividing total overhead for the period by number of units produced.
However, in most situations, units of different products produced are not uniform. For
example, a firm producing pumps of different types and different sizes cannot use a rate
per unit for overhead absorption. It has to establish rate per equivalent unit, taking a
particular type of pump as the measurement unit, provided it can convert one unit of each
variety of pumps into equivalent units. Usually firms use machine hour rate for machine-
intensive cost centres and direct-labour hour rate for labour-intensive cost centres. Use of
an hourly rate provides accurate result in situations where the amount of resources, in a
particular production cost centre, consumed by different units routed through that cost
centre varies in direction proportion to the time spent by those units in that cost centre.
7/29/2019 Chapter 3 Overheads Final
12/29
12
Moreover, use of an hourly rate avoids the complexity of converting one unit of each
variety of products in to equivalent units.
Pre-determined overhead rates
Firms use predetermined overhead absorption rate computed for a normal period (usually,
one year) of business activity. Usually budgeted figures are used to calculate the
overhead absorption rate. Therefore, the method does not involve additional clerical
work. The following are the advantages in using predetermined overhead absorption
rate:
(i) Product costs can be worked out promptly.
(ii) Product costs can be estimated correctly even before production activity commences
and this helps the management in deciding the prices to be quoted to prospective
customers. However, this may not be counted as a true advantage for two reasons. First,
price of a product is determined by factors operating at the market place; and second,
product cost determined for use in valuing stock cannot be used for decision making
except in rare circumstances.
(iii) Product costs are not unnecessarily affected by seasonal fluctuations in costs and
activity levels.
Some cost accountants suggest use of moving average rate for overhead absorption.
Under this method, moving average is calculated with reference to figures for the twelve
months immediately preceding the month for which the rate has to be determined. For
example, if rate is to be determined for the month of August 2008, figures for twelve
months ended July 2008 will be considered in calculating the absorption rate. This
method uses figures pertaining to some of the months falling in the previous accounting
year and to that extent the rate gets distorted because past figures fail to incorporate
changes planned in the budget for the current year. Although under this method, delay is
less as compared to delay in calculating the actual rate; it fails to provide data well in
advance for the purpose of cost estimation. Therefore, it is preferable to use
predetermined overhead absorption rate.
Length of the period
The general principle governing the selection of the period is that the period should be
long enough to normalize the rate. In industries which are subject to cyclical fluctuations
7/29/2019 Chapter 3 Overheads Final
13/29
13
in business, perhaps the best alternative is to select a period which covers all the phases
of a cycle. The period in such a case may be longer than one year. Selection of period is
also influenced by seasonality of costs. Many overhead items such as repairs and
maintenance, rates and taxes, heating and insurance are not incurred evenly throughout
the year. If there is a predominance of such items, the period selected should longer as
compared to that in industries in which costs accrue evenly. Similarly, in industries in
which production is seasonal, the period selected should be longer as compared to that in
which production volume does not fluctuate from period to period. The objective is to
determine the normal rate.
Usually, predetermined overhead absorption rates are calculated at the beginning of each
accounting year.
What activity level should be used?
Overhead rate per unit or per hour is influenced by the activity level used as denominator
in calculating the rate.
The estimated activity level can be based on:
1. Average output of past years;
2. Estimated output of the current year;
3. Normal production capacity.
The average output of past few years does not represent the normal capacity. Therefore,
the rate calculated by using the average output as denominator is not the normal rate. This
method is suitable for small firms because of its simplicity. In large firms conditions are
rarely static and, therefore, average output of past years should not be used for
computation of predetermined overhead rates.
Estimated output of the current year (the period in which the rate will be used) may or
may not represent the normal capacity. In the year of depression, estimated production
level is likely to be lower as compared to the normal production level. Similarly, in boom
period estimated production level is likely to be higher as compared to the normal
production level.
Overhead absorption rate determined based on estimated output would be comparatively
higher during recession and lower during boom. In other words, during the period of
reduced activity and falling prices, the cost of production would be higher as compared to
7/29/2019 Chapter 3 Overheads Final
14/29
14
the cost during the period of normal business. Similarly during the period of increased
activity and rising prices the cost of production would be lower. This is highly illogical.
Moreover, it is against the basic cost-accounting principle that products should neither be
loaded with abnormal costs nor benefit from abnormal gains. According to this principle,
abnormal costs should be directly charged to the costing profit and loss account and
abnormal gains should be directly credited to the costing profit and loss account. In
accordance with this principle, the predetermined overhead absorption rate should be a
normal rate and should be such that the total overhead is absorbed if normal production is
achieved. If the actual production is below the normal production, the unabsorbed
overheads arising due to idle capacity should be transferred to the costing profit and loss
account. Similarly, if the actual production exceeds the normal production, over-absorbed
overheads should be credited to the costing profit and loss account.
Normal capacity refers to the expected average production over a sufficiently long period
covering a business cycle. Expected average production is determined taking into account
the practical capacity and the average market demand. Normal capacity should be used as
denominator for calculating predetermined overhead absorption rates and temporary
fluctuation in output level should be disregarded. The following are the advantages in
using normal production capacity in calculating the predetermined overhead absorption
rates:
(a) It helps calculate and recover the true cost of production. If a factory or a cost centre
is operating below normal capacity, it cannot be said that the whole of the fixed cost has
been incurred in achieving the actual output.
(b) It helps calculate and highlight losses due to idle time.
The twin objectives of cost accounting, namely, determination of normal product cost and
cost control are best achieved by using normal recovery rate. Therefore, normal capacity
should be used for calculating the predetermined overhead absorption rate.
Illustration 3.4 (Machine hour rate)
Three machines P, Q and R, which are of different nature, are used in a department of a
factory. From the following information, compute machine-hour rate of machine R:
7/29/2019 Chapter 3 Overheads Final
15/29
15
(i) Total cost of machine P, Q and R is CU 50,000, out of which cost of machine R is CU
10,000. Its estimated scrap value and working life are CU 1,000 and 18,000 hours,
respectively;
(ii) Rent (total area 1,000 sq. ft and machine R occupies 250 sq. ft): CU 780 per annum;
(iii) Lighting (total light points 12, out of which 2 points are used for machine R): CU
288 per annum;
(iv) Insurance premium for all machines: CU 45 per quarter;
(v) Consumable stores for machine R: CU 60 per month;
(vi) Salary for supervisor (supervisor denotes 1/4th of his time for machine R): CU 6,000
per annum;
(vii) Repair and maintenance for the entire life of machine R: CU 1,800;
(viii) Machine R consumes 5 units of power per hour at a cost of CU 16 per 100 units;
(ix) Machine R will work 2,000 hours per annum out of which normal idle time
estimated at 8% of total working hours and time for routine maintenance estimated at 40
hours per annum.
(Adapted, B.Com, CU)
Solution
Computation of Machine Hour Rate
Particulars Per
annum
(CU)
Per
hour
(CU)
Standing charges:
Rent CU 780 (250/1000) 195
Insurance CU 45 4 (10,000/50,000) 36
Salary of supervisor CU 6,000 (1/4) 1,500
2,731 1.517
Running charges:
Depreciation (CU 10,000 Rs. 1,000)/18,000
0.500
Repairs and maintenance CU 1,800/18,000 0.100
Lighting CU 288 (2/12) (1/1,800) 0.027
7/29/2019 Chapter 3 Overheads Final
16/29
16
Consumable stores (CU 60 12)/1,800 0.400
Power (CU 16/100) 5 0.800
Machine-hour rate 3.344
Note: Effective working hours = (20,000 0.08 2,000 40) = 1,800 hours.
Under- or over-absorption of overheads
When a firm use pre-determined rate to absorb overhead, factory overhead incurred
during a period may exceed the factory overhead applied to units produced during that
period. The excess is under-absorbed overhead. For example, if overhead incurred was
CU 100,000 and overhead applied to production units was CU 90,000, there was under-
absorption of CU 10,000. If applied overheads exceed overheads incurred, the difference
is over-absorbed overhead. For example, if actual overhead was CU 100,000 and
overhead applied to production was CU 120,000, there was over-absorption of CU
20,000. In either case, the difference must be analyzed to determine the causes of the
variance. Under or over absorption may arise either due to the difference between actual
expenditure and budgeted expenditure or due to difference in budgeted production
volume and actual production.
Over or under absorption of overheads should be calculated at the end of each accounting
period. More frequent calculations may give rise to seasonal variations which offset each
other over the full accounting period.
Under-absorbed overheads are written-off to the profit and loss account and over-
absorbed overheads are credited to the profit and loss account if the following conditions
are fulfilled:
(i) Over- or under-absorption has arisen due to the difference between the output
achieved and the normal output level; or
(ii) The amount is not significant in relation to the total factory overhead incurred.
In both the above situations, production costs are normal and require no correction.
Under-absorption arising due to idle capacity should always be charged to the profit and
loss account. Similarly, over-absorption arising due to higher (as compared to normal)
capacity utilization should always be credited to the profit and loss account.
If the variance is significant and has arisen from an error in the fixation of rates,
production costs should be adjusted. The total variance is apportioned between
7/29/2019 Chapter 3 Overheads Final
17/29
17
inventories (finished goods and work-in-progress) and cost of goods sold by using
supplementary rates.
Some firm use Suspense Account and transfer the amount of under- or over- recovery to
the suspense account. The suspense account is carried over to subsequent accounting
years for writing off as deferred charge or for crediting as deferred credit. This method is
justified only under the following circumstances:
(i) Variances have arisen due to seasonal fluctuations and business cycle which cover
more than one period.
(ii) Variances have arisen in initial periods of a new project which is yet to achieve 100%
utilization of the normal capacity.
This method is not in common use.
Illustration 3.5
In a manufacturing unit overhead was recovered at a pre-determined rate of CU 25 per
man-day. The total factory overhead incurred and the man-days actually worked were CU
4,150,000 and 150,000, respectively. Out of the 40,000 units produced in a period,
30,000 units were sold. There were also 30,000 incomplete units which may be reckoned
at 66.67 per cent complete. On analyzing the reasons, it was found that 40% of the
unabsorbed overheads were due to defective planning and the rest were attributable to
increase in overhead costs. How would an absorbed overhead be treated in cost accounts?
(Adapted, ICWA, Inter)
Solution
(A) Computation of under- or over-absorbed overheads
Overhead actually incurred CU 4,150,000
Overhead absorbed: CU 25 150,000 man-days = CU 3,750,000
Overhead under-absorbed CU 400,000
(B) Reasons for under-absorption
Due to defective planning 40% of CU 400,000 CU 160,000
Due to increase in overhead cost (Balancing figure) CU. 240,000
Under absorbed amount of CU 160,000, attributable to defective planning is to be treated
period cost and is to be directly charged to profit and loss account. Product cost needs
to be adjusted for Rs. 240,000, being the amount of under-absorbed overheads arisen due
7/29/2019 Chapter 3 Overheads Final
18/29
18
to error in estimating overhead costs. It is assumed that the difference in expenditure has
not arisen from an abnormal transaction or event.
(C) Apportionment of CU 240,000 between cost of sales, finished good and incomplete
units:
(i) Total production during the period in terms completed unit
(a)Number of units completed: 30,000 + 10,000 = 40,000 units
(b) Incomplete units in terms of completed unit: 66 .67% of 30,000units = 20,000 units
Total production in terms of completed unit: 60,000 units
(ii) Apportionment in the ratio of completed units
(a) To cost of sales: CU 240,000 (30,000/60,000) = CU 120,000
(b) To finished goods: CU 240,000 (10,000/60,000) = CU 40,000
(c)To incomplete units: CU 240,000 (20,000/60,000) = CU 80,000
(D) Treatment of under-absorbed overheads in cost accounts
To be written off to costing profit and loss account: CU 160,000
To be absorbed in cost of sales: 120,000
To be absorbed in stock of finished goods 40,000
To be absorbed in Stock of work-in-progress 80,000
CU 400,000
3.1.5 Capacity Levels
Capacitygenerally implies the maximum that can be achieved by the best possible use of
the available facilities and other resources (e.g. human resources, basic organization
structures, funds, etc.). Capacity depends upon the fixed amount of resources with which
the management expects to run the business. The concept is applicable to plant and
equipment and other resources such as human resources and material. Usually capacities
of different operations in the production process are not balanced. Therefore, the
bottleneck operation, which has the minimum capacity among all operations,
determines the capacity of the complete production process. Let us take an example,
assume that there are five operations A, B, C, D and E in the production process.
Capacities of A, B, C, and D are 1,000 units. The capacity of E is 900 units. The capacity
of the production process is 900 units.
Usually, capacity is expressed in terms of number of units or standard hours per annum.
7/29/2019 Chapter 3 Overheads Final
19/29
19
Theoretical capacity (Ideal capacity)
It refers to the output that can be achieved if production is carried out at a maximum
speed without interruption. With reference to plant and equipment, it indicates the rated
capacity, that is, the capacity specified by the manufacturer or erector of the plant. Thus,
theoretical capacity assumes no loss of time.
Practical capacity
This represents the production volume that can be achieved by efficient operation.
Practical capacity provides for unavoidable operating interruptions such as weekly off,
time lost for repair, unavoidable inefficiencies, normal down-time, normal breakdown,
set-ups, etc. Practical capacity should be determined taking into account the maximum
number of hours for which the facility can be used during the year.
Practical capacity is determined by deducting unavoidable operating interruptions from
theoretical capacity, and is usually expressed as a percentage of theoretical capacity. The
percentage varies from industry to industry. On an average, practical capacity is expected
to be between 7585 per cent of the theoretical capacity.
Normal capacity
The level of capacity utilization which satisfies the average customer demand is termed
as normal capacity. Average is calculated by taking expected sales over a reasonably long
period (35 years). Selection of a sufficiently long period levels out the peaks and
troughs which come with seasonal and cyclical variations. Normal capacity is also termed
as average capacityand is often less than 100 per cent of practical capacity.
Budgeted capacity
Budgeted capacity represents the expected (planned) level of activity for the budget
period. Usually budget period covers one year..
Capacity based on sales expectancy
Products are manufactured to be sold and, therefore, if a firm is unable to sell what it can
produce, it would restrict its output for a particular period to the quantity expected to be
sold during the period. Expected sales volume is determined after a careful analysis of the
competitive conditions, general demand of the product and the influence of price changes
on the sales volume. While capacity based on sales expectancy is a short-term concept,
7/29/2019 Chapter 3 Overheads Final
20/29
20
normal capacity is a long-term concept. Usually budgeted capacity represents capacity
based on sales expectancy.
Actual capacity
Output achieved during the year is often termed as actual capacity. Usually, actual
capacity fluctuates from year to year and may be more or less than the normal capacity. It
cannot be more than the practical capacity.
Idle capacity
Idle capacityrepresents the temporary idleness of production or distribution facilities due
to slow down in the inflow of orders. Idle capacity is the difference between the normal
capacity and the actual capacity. Idle capacity may be divided into normal idle capacity
and abnormal idle capacity. The difference between the normal capacity and the budgeted
capacity may be viewed as normal idle capacity. The difference between the budgeted
capacity and actual capacity may be viewed as abnormal idle capacity.
Excess capacity
Excess capacity represents the capacity which the firm does not expect to utilise in the
near future (35 years). Firms create excess capacity because either the investment is
indivisible or it expects increase in demand in the long term. Excess capacity is the
difference between the practical capacity and the normal capacity.
Excess capacity in a workstation might arise due to imbalance in practical capacities
among different workstations. This excess capacity can be reduced by attempting
synchronization of capacities of different workstations.
3.1.6 Accounting for Some Specific Cost Items
Estimating and drawing office expenses
Estimating and drawing office should be treated as a service cost centre. The overheads
are usually reapportioned to production cost centres for final recovery. However, a
portion of overheads collected under this cost centre is often treated as selling overhead
and the balance is reapportioned to production cost centre. For example, expenses
associated with preparation of tender estimates are treated as selling overhead.
In a heavy engineering factory manufacturing specific on-off jobs, drawing hours for
each job are recorded, and drawing office expenses are directly apportioned to jobs by
using an hourly rate.
7/29/2019 Chapter 3 Overheads Final
21/29
21
Canteen expenses
If the canteen runs on no profit, no loss basis, cost to the firm is zero. If the canteen is
subsidized, the amount of subsidy is treated as factory overhead. The canteen is treated as
a separate service cost centre and the net subsidy is reapportioned to production cost
centres. If there is more than one canteen (e.g. workers canteen, supervisors canteen,
officers canteen), each canteen should be treated as a separate cost centre. Similarly,
subsidy to canteens supporting sales or administration offices should be treated as
sales/administration overhead.
Costs auxiliary to salaries and wages
Costs auxiliary to salaries and wages include contribution to P.F., E.S.I., gratuity funds,
pension funds and costs for providing fringe benefits to employees. If possible, auxiliary
costs related to direct workmen should be charged to units produced by inflating the wage
rates to be applied for the recovery of direct wages. Alternatively, those should be treated
as overhead of the respective cost centres. Auxiliary costs related to indirect workers and
other employees should be treated as overhead.
Maintenance and repair of plant and buildings
Maintenance and repair cost should be analyzed separately under the following
categories:
(a) Costs of preventive maintenance
(b) Costs of major overhaul
(c) Costs of repairing breakdowns
Maintenance and repair costs include costs of maintenance spares and other materials,
employee costs, and expenses of the maintenance department. The method of issuing
service order authorizing each maintenance and repair work helps accumulate costs.
Usually, repair hours are booked against each service order along with costs of spares and
other materials. Maintenance department expenses are apportioned to each service order
on the basis of maintenance hours. Costs accumulated against service orders are
allocated to respective production cost centres. Cost for maintenance hours, not
accounted for by service order, is reapportioned to production cost centres on some
equitable basis.
7/29/2019 Chapter 3 Overheads Final
22/29
22
True costs of maintenance and repair can be worked out only if costs of other services
received by the maintenance cost centre and administration costs are added to
maintenance cost centre expenses. However, as the total expenditure on maintenance and
repairs is in itself an overhead cost, such precision is usually considered wasteful.
Cost for packing
Packing may be of the following three types:
(i) Primary packing: Packing that is essential for protection and convenient handling of
the product;
(ii) Secondary packing: Packing that is essential for safe transportation of the product;
(iii) Fancy packing: Packing which aims to attract customers attention.
Primary packing is treated as factory overhead, secondary packing is treated as
distribution cost and fancy packing is treated as advertisement cost.
Packing department is a separate cost centre and the total expenses are apportioned
between primary packing, secondary packing and fancy packing on the basis of some
technical estimate. Costs apportioned to primary packing are then reapportioned to
production cost centres on some equitable basis.
Royalties and patent fees
Royalty based on units produced is treated as factory overhead. Royalty based on units
sold is treated as selling expenses. If royalty is a fixed charge like rent, it is treated as
factory overhead. The expenditure incurred for registration and renewal of patent is
treated as administration overhead.
3.2 ADMINISTRATION OVERHEADS
Administration overheads are expenses associated with the administration of an
undertaking. Costs of formulating the policy, directing the organization and controlling
the operations of an undertaking which are not directly related to production, selling,
distribution, research or development activity or function are administration overheads.
Thus, administration overheads do not include costs of administering manufacturing
activities. Those costs are treated as manufacturing overhead. For example, costs of
operating a time office are manufacturing overheads and not administration overheads.
Examples of administration overheads are: office rents and rates; expenses of office
lighting, heating and cleaning; depreciation, and costs of maintenance, repair and
7/29/2019 Chapter 3 Overheads Final
23/29
23
insurance of office building, office furniture and office equipment; salaries to office staff;
directors remuneration; office supplies and other expenses; expenses on postage,
telephone and courier services; printing and stationery; audit fees; legal expenses; and
bank charges.
Administration is an independent function and is as important as the other major
functions. Since no direct relationship can be established between administration
overhead and products or jobs manufactured and sold, and because these costs are largely
fixed in nature, they are treated as period costs and charged directly to costing profit and
loss account.
3.3 SELLING AND DISTRIBUTION OVERHEADS
Selling overheads are costs of creating and stimulating demand and securing and
executing orders. Costs of manufacturing and distributing finished products are excluded
from selling overheads.
Distribution overheads are costs of moving finished products to central and local storage,
moving finished products to the customers, moving finished products to and from the
prospective customers as in the case of goods on sale or return basis and making empty
packages reusable.
In short, when a product is placed in a saleable condition, production function ends and
distribution function begins. Overheads related to distribution function are termed as
distribution overhead. Many accountants prefer to deal with selling and distribution
overheads together. Examples of selling overheads are: salaries, commissions, travelling
expenses of salesmen and technical representatives; sales office expenses; bad debts;
brokerage or third-party commissions; cost of operating the marketing information
system including market research; expenses on advertisement and publicity; cost of
catalogues and price lists; and costs of maintenance of showrooms.
Examples of distribution overheads are: carriage and freight outwards; depreciation, cost
of repair and maintenance, insurance charges and operating costs of distribution vehicles;
costs of secondary packing; warehousing expenses; expenses on insurance of finished
goods; and wastage of finished goods.
Selling and distribution overheads are treated as period costs and charged directly to
costing profit and loss account.
7/29/2019 Chapter 3 Overheads Final
24/29
24
3.4 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS
Research is original and planned investigation undertaken with the prospect of gaining
new scientific or technical knowledge and understanding. Development is the application
of research findings or other knowledge into a plan or design for the production of new or
substantially improved materials, devices, products, processes, systems or services prior
to the commencement of commercial production or use.
An enterprise undertakes research to increase the stock of its scientific knowledge and
devices new applications which is expected to create competitive advantage for its
business.
Research activities aim at the discovery of new knowledge which can be used in
developing new products, services, processes, techniques or in improving existing
products or processes. Development starts where research ends. The results of a research
cannot be put directly to commercial use. It requires feasibility study and identifying
practical difficulties which may arise in its applications. Development activities include
conceptual formulation, design and listing of product/process alternatives, development
of prototypes, etc.
Research and development costs are likely to benefit future products and, therefore, an
elaborate system of absorbing these costs to products, orders or process is hardly
justified. Where research has been undertaken at the request of a client, it should
obviously be charged to the customer. If research is specifically related to an existing
product, it should be directly assigned to the product and considered in analyzing the
profitability of the product. Research undertaken for the general interest of the firm
should be treated as period cost.
3.5 ACCOUNTING FOR CERTAIN KEY ITEMS
Bad debt
There are two approaches for treating bad debt in cost accounts. One view is that bad
debt is a financial loss only and should be excluded from cost accounts. The other view is
that bad debt is similar to other expenses and should not be excluded from cost accounts.
Accordingly, bad debt is considered an item of selling overhead. Abnormally high bad
debts and bad debts of exceptional nature should be excluded from cost accounts. They
should be charged to the profit and loss account.
7/29/2019 Chapter 3 Overheads Final
25/29
25
Advertisement costs
Advertisement costs should be allocated and apportioned to various functions. For
example, cost of advertisement for recruitment should be allocated to the personnel
function. Costs of advertisements to create and retain demand for products and services
should be allocated to selling function. Advertisement cost is an overhead but its
accounting depends on its exact nature.
Advertisement cost which is likely to result in a long-term benefit should be treated as
fixed asset and depreciation on the same should be treated as selling overhead, e.g. the
cost of neon signs.
Market research costs
Market research addresses itself to specific marketing problems. This includes the study
of potential markets, customers behaviour, competitors strategy, etc. It is like a policy
cost because it does not depend on the activity level, but varies with management policy
on market research.
The market research cost is treated as a selling overhead. However, if it is high in a
particular period, it should be treated as a deferred charge. Only a portion of it should be
included in the overhead for the current year and the balance should be carried forward to
future years for inclusion in overhead costs for those years.
Royalty and patent fees
Royalty and patent fees may either be based on the units sold or produced, or may take
the form of a periodical payment of a predetermined amount. If royalty and patent fees
are fixed charges in the nature of rent, or are based on the number of units produced, they
should be treated as manufacturing overheads. On the other hand, if they are based on the
number of units sold, they should be treated as selling overhead.
After-sales services
It is a common practice to offer continued free support/maintenance services during a
stipulated guarantee period.
Treatment of cost of after-sales services in cost accounts depends upon the cause which
has given rise to the after-sales services. If it is to rectify manufacturing defects, the cost
is treated as manufacturing overhead. If design department is responsible for the defect,
the cost is allocated to design department. If damage is caused in transit, the cost is
7/29/2019 Chapter 3 Overheads Final
26/29
26
treated as distribution overhead. The following after-sales service costs are usually
treated as selling overhead:
(a) Costs of routine services
(b)Costs of after-sales services rendered only to retain customers goodwill, even though
such services are not covered under any agreement.
Appropriate accounting of costs of after-sales services requires a careful analysis of the
total costs. Costs on after-sales services of an exceptional nature should be charged off to
profit and loss account. For example, if suddenly an electrical engineering company
incurs an abnormally heavy expenditure in rectifying a defect in a transformer supplied to
a customer, inclusion of the same in production or selling costs would distort costs of
production or sales. It is, therefore, logical to charge such a heavy expenditure to profit
and loss account.
ASSIGNMENT
3.1 (Re-apportionment)
The Space Production Company manufactures components for radio and television
satellites using two service departments and two production departments. The inter-
departmental relationship and estimated overhead costs are given below:
Percentage of Service Provided
Maintenance Scheduling Moulding Assembly
From: Maintenance 10% 40% 50%
Scheduling 20% 50% 30%
Total overhead cost CU 750,000 400,000 378,000 276,000
Required:
(i) Using the direct method, show the amount of scheduling department costs to be
allocated to assembly departments.
(ii) Repeat (i) using the step method and allocating maintenance first.
(iii) Repeat (ii) using the reciprocal method (method of simultaneous equations may be
used).
[Answer: (i) CU 120,000 (ii) Moulding CU 959,122; Assembly CU 844,878
(iii) Moulding CU 959,122; Assembly CU 844,878.]
3.2 (Overhead absorption)
7/29/2019 Chapter 3 Overheads Final
27/29
27
A manufacturing company has two departments X and Y and all products pass through
both the departments. The following figures relate to production cost for June, 2008:
X Y
Direct labour-hours 6,000 4,000
Machine-hours 4,500 2,000
Raw materials CU 100,000 CU 50,000
Direct wages CU 6,000 CU 8,000
Overheads CU 45,000 CU 10,000
Job card for job no. 1 shows:
Raw materials CU 3,000 CU 1,000
Direct wages CU 250 CU 380
Direct labour-hours 225 200
Machine-hours 200 600
What method would you recommend for absorbing overhead? Give reasons. Compute the
cost of job no. 1 under the method recommended by you and under another method of
overhead absorption.
(Adapted, ICWA, Inter)
[Answer: Using machine-hour rate CU 9,630.00; using labour-hour rate CU 6,817.50.]
3.3 (Overhead absorption)
The following particulars related to the production department of a factory for the month
of June, 2008.
Material used CU 80,000
Direct wages CU 72,000
Direct labour-hours worked 20,000
Hours of machine operation 25,000
Overhead charges allocated to the department CU 90,000
Cost data of a particular work order carried out in the above department during June,
2008 are given below:
Material used CU 8,000
Direct wages CU 6,250
Labour-hours booked 3,300
7/29/2019 Chapter 3 Overheads Final
28/29
28
Machine-hours booked 2,400
What would be the factory cost of the work order under the following methods of
charging overheads?
(i) Direct labour cost rate;
(ii) Machine-hour rate; and
(iii) Direct labour-hour rate
(Adapted, ICWA, Inter)
[Answer: (i) CU 22,062.50 (ii) CU 22,890.00 (iii) CU 29,100.00.]
3.4 (Comprehensive machine-hour rate)
A machine shop has 6 identical machines manned by 5 operators. The machine cannot be
worked without any operator wholly engaged on it. The original cost of all these 6
machines works out at CU 0.6 million. The following estimates are available for the year
2008:
(a) Normal working hours per month 220 hr
(b) Absenteeism (without pay) per month 20 hr
(c) Leave with pay per month 20 hr
(d) Normal idle time (unavoidable) 20 hr
(e) Average rate of wages per day of 8 hours CU 40
(f) Production bonus 15% of wages
(g) Cost of power for the period CU 20,700
(h) Supervision and indirect labour cost for the year CU 8,100
(i) Lighting and electricity per annum CU 3,070
(j) Repairs and maintenance of machines 20% of the value of machines p.a.
(k)Insurance charges CU. 30,000 p.a.
(l) General management expenses as allocated for the year CU 84,000
(m)Depreciation under straight line method 15% on original cost of machines
You are required to workout a comprehensive machine-hour rate for the machine shops.
(Adapted, B.Com, CU)
[Answer: Machine-hour rate CU 33.01.]
Hint: Working-hours per month: 220 (20 + 20 + 20) = 160 hr. per worker; for 6
machines 5 160 = 800 hr.
7/29/2019 Chapter 3 Overheads Final
29/29
3.5 (Administration overheads)
In a certain business, administration costs are absorbed as a percentage of production
costs. It is found that tenders for work made of expensive materials are regularly being
lost on account of price, whereas, tenders for work using cheap materials are accepted.
What explanations and/or recommendations would you make to the management
regarding the matter?
(Adapted, ICWA, Inter)
Recommended