CISC, RISC, and Post-RISC Computers

CISC, RISC, and Post-RISC Computers

CE 140 A1/A24 July 2003

Required Reading

RISC vs. CISC: the Post-RISC Era John “Hannibal” Stokes

http://www.arstechnica.com/cpu/4q 99/risc-cisc/rvc-1.html

Review: Basic Performance Equation

T = (N x S) / R T – program execution time N – number of instructions S – average steps per instruction R – clock rate

Technological Conditions (Late 70’s to Early 80’s)

Storage and memory Generally, expensive and slow

Compilers Long compilation time, unoptimized

output VLSI

“low” transistor densities

Solution

Storage and memory More compact code

Compilers Make HLLASM translation simpler Code in assembly for optimized program

VLSI Reduce number of required transistors.

How?

“Software crisis”

Hardware costs were falling Software development costs were

rising

Solution

Shift complexity from software to hardware

Bridge “semantic gap” between machine capabilities and high-level languages

Complex Instruction Set Computer

Late 1970s: experimentation with complex instructions made possible by interpreter (microprogrammed control)

CISC generally required use of microprogrammed control

CISC

Increased use of complex, multistep instructions

Lower N, higher S Made the addition of new features to

old microprocessors easy Example: 8086 (1978) Pentium

(1993) by Intel

CISC

Complex instructions More steps Larger and more expensive ICs Sometimes lead to reduced

performance Less instructions per program less

code

CISC

Powerful instructions More direct implementation of high-level language operations

Allows more complex addressing modes

CISC Issues

Larger instruction set larger control stores larger microprograms

Larger microprograms slower and difficult to test

“Semantic gap” “Semantic clash”

CISC Issues

80/20 rule – 80% of the instructions use only 20% of the instruction set

Need to maintain backward compatibility increased development cost

Reduced Instruction Set Computer

Reduced Instruction Set Computer Mid-1970s – John Cocke – IBM 801 1980: Patterson and Séquin – RISC

processor SPARC 1981: Hennessy – MIPS processor

Technological Conditions

Cheaper memory Better compilers

RISC

“Make the common case fast” Speed up 20% of instruction set

Simpler instructions Simpler addressing modes

Increased performance Higher N, lower S Complexity is moved from hardware

to software

RISC

“Even if a RISC machine takes four or five instructions to do what a CISC machine does in one instruction, if the RISC instructions are 10 times as fast, RISC wins”

RISC Well-suited to pipelined execution,

parallelism Can be used effectively by optimizing

compilers Hardwired control faster direct

execution Simpler hardware Smaller chip

area more space for registers and cache

RISC and Compilers

Compilers play a more prominent role Need for intelligent, optimizing

compilers

RISC Design Principles

All instructions are directly executed by hardware Hardwired Control

Maximize the rate at which instructions are issued

Instructions should be easy to decode Regular, fixed-length instructions

RISC Design Principles

Only Loads and Stores should reference memory

Provide plenty of registers

CISC versus RISC

Example: CISC:

MULT [ADDR1], [ADDR2] RISC

LOAD A, [ADDR1] LOAD B, [ADDR2] MULT A, B STORE [ADDR1], A

“Why aren’t RISC machines as popular as CISC machines?”

Not a totally valid question Big investment in software for Intel-

based machines (primarily CISC) Compatibility Intel-based machines now have a

RISC core Common instructions Faster Uncommon instructions Slower

CISC and RISC

Now the term RISC refers to any computer with an ISA and CPU organization that is designed for high performance

Size of instruction set is now considered relatively unimportant

Focus on fast instructions, not number of instructions

The Post-RISC Era

Current Technological Conditions Cheap and fast memory Better compiler features Increased transistor count

The Post-RISC Era

Performance improvements Superscalar execution Branch prediction Hardware Out-of-order execution (OOO) SIMD and FP units Additional fast, simple instructions Software OOO

Post-RISC Processors

Intel Pentium 4 AMD Athlon

CISC instructions translated to RISC instructions (also in the Pentium 4)

PowerPC G3 / G4 / G5 Shows convergence of RISC and CISC

with the same technologies being used

Post-RISC Era Line between CISC and RISC

processors are blurred Different problems and technological

conditions different solution, not strictly CISC or RISC

Each computer must be evaluated not just on the basis of being CISC or RISC, but as a whole, including hardware and software