View
3
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.
• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal
If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Dec 20, 2017
Commuting patterns and non-work interactions in the Greater Copenhagen Area
Nielsen, Thomas Alexander Sick
Publication date:2011
Document VersionPublisher's PDF, also known as Version of record
Link back to DTU Orbit
Citation (APA):Nielsen, T. A. S. (2011). Commuting patterns and non-work interactions in the Greater Copenhagen AreaKgs.Lyngby: Technical University of Denmark, Transport. [Sound/Visual production (digital)]. EURA Conference2011, Copenhagen, Denmark, 23/06/2011
Cities without limitsEURA Conference Copenhagen 2011
Commuting patterns and non-work interactions in theinteractions in the
Greater Copenhagen Areap gThomas Sick Nielsen
KU-LIFE / DTU Transportthnie@transport.dtu.dk
Commuting and non work interactionsCommuting and non-work interactions
• Analysis of regional dependencies and interactions often based on commuting.g
• However, other travel purposes are growing rapidlygrowing rapidly
• The composition of travel demand is changing - and possibly regional interactions and economies.interactions and economies.
AgendaAgenda
• General trends in the geographical distribution of work and leisure activities
• Leisure and commuting flows in Denmark• Activity fields and directions in the GreaterActivity fields and directions in the Greater
Copenhagen area
Distance between dwelling and activity destinations:
80%
70%
80%
purp
ose Work
Leisure
50%
60%
ion
with
in p
30%
40%
ity d
estin
ati
10%
20%
are
of a
ctiv
i
0%
10%
0-10 km 10 -20 km 20-30 km 30-40 km >40 km
Sha
Source: Danish National Travel Survey 2009
Distance between dwelling and work or education destinations 1999 and 2009
70%66%70%
80%
Work/education 1999
Work/education 2009
50%
60%
estin
atio
ns
30%
40%
of a
ctiv
ity d
e
16%
7%
17%
8%10%
20%
Shar
e o
7%3% 4%
8%4%
6%
0%
10%
0-10 km 10 -20 km 20-30 km 30-40 km >40 km
Source: Danish National Travel Survey 1999; 2009
Distance between dwelling and leisure destinations 1999 and 2009
90%
77%
70%70%
80%
90%
Leisure 1999L i 2009
60%
70%
estin
atio
ns
Leisure 2009
40%
50%
f act
ivity
de
11% 12%
20%
30%
Shar
e of
10%
4% 2%7%
11%
5%3%
12%
0%
10%
0 10 k 10 20 k 20 30 k 30 40 k 40 k0-10 km 10 -20 km 20-30 km 30-40 km >40 km
Source: Danish National Travel Survey 1999; 2009
Commuterflows in DenmarkCommuterflows in Denmark
Desireline traces mapped as standard deviations from mean value
Leisureflows in DenmarkLeisureflows in Denmark
Desireline traces mapped as standard deviations from mean value
Activity fields measure by standard elipcesActivity fields measure by standard elipcesWork Leisure
Standard deviational elipces of activity destinations mapped for selected origons
Commuting directions by distance from the dwelling to the core
100%
80%
90%
60%
70%
Local
40%
50% Circumferential
Outbound
Inbound
10%
20%
30% Inbound
0%
10%
0‐10 km10‐20 km
20‐30 km30‐40 km
40‐50 km50‐60 km
60‐70 km70‐80 km
80‐90 km90‐100 kkm 0 km 0 km 0 km 0 km 0 km 0 km 0 km 0 km 00 km
Inbound: travel to a destination which is at leat 10 km closer to the regionsl centre than the home
Leisure activity directions by distance from the dwelling to the core
100%
80%
90%
60%
70%
Local
40%
50% Circumferential
Outbound
20%
30% Inbound
0%
10%
0 1 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 900‐10 km10‐20 km
20‐30 km30‐40 km
40‐50 km50‐60 km
60‐70 km70‐80 km
80‐90 km90‐100 km
Inbound: travel to a destination which is at leat 10 km closer to the regionsl centre than the home
Some conclusions
•Geographical flexibility for leisure activities is•Geographical flexibility for leisure activities is developing rapidly
•Leisure is polarised between local and regional activities but average activity fields are generally
larger than commuting fields.g g
Greater Copenhagen area
•In the Greater Copenhagen area leisureIn the Greater Copenhagen area leisure activities are generally biased towards the core –
but much less so than commutingbut much less so than commuting.
Diff i th t t lit I b d•Difference in the response to centrality. Inbound leisure peaks and maintains its highest levels
outside the ’Fingerplan’ area (>40 km) –indicating a large peri-urban region shopping forindicating a large peri urban region shopping for
entertainment in the more central parts of the metro areametro area.
Recommended