Construction Fundamentals: Avoiding Common Pitfalls · 2. Standardized ... Construction Management...

© Copyright 2016 Tucker Arensberg, P.C. All Rights Reserved.

Construction Fundamentals: Avoiding Common Pitfalls

Matthew M. Hoffman, EsquireTucker Arensberg, P.C.

June 21, 2017

Program

Standardized Contracts Critical Contract Issues Separations Act of 1913 Payment Disputes Delay Claims Dispute Resolution

www.tuckerlaw.com2

Standardized Contracts Contract Document Families

American Institute of Architects (AIA) Engineers Joint Contract Documents Committee

(EJCDC) Associated General Contractors (AGC) Design Build Institute of America (DBIA) Construction Management Association of America

(CMAA)

www.tuckerlaw.com3

Standardized Contracts Contract Document Families

American Institute of Architects (AIA) Engineers Joint Contract Documents Committee

(EJCDC) Associated General Contractors (AGC) Design Build Institute of America (DBIA) Construction Management Association of America

(CMAA)

www.tuckerlaw.com4

Standardized Contracts Benefits:

Readily accepted in industry Reflect years of experience Have been tested and interpreted by courts Familiar to arbitrators

False sense of security Knowledgeable review and revision

www.tuckerlaw.com5

Design Professional Agreement Scope Issues

Attendance at meetings Municipal approvals PlanCon Frequency of site presence Architect role / responsibility for contractor

performance As-built drawings Project documentation Warranty review and assistance

www.tuckerlaw.com6

Design Professional Agreement Responsibilities for rebidding of project Assistance with analysis and defense of

contractor claims Assistance with defense vs. service as fact witness

www.tuckerlaw.com7

Design Professional Agreement Codify in contract applicable standard of care

The Architect shall develop Construction Documents that, to the extent consistent with normal professional standards, are adequate and sufficient to accomplish the purposes of the Project and comply with applicable laws, statutes, ordinances, codes, orders, rules and regulations in force as of the date of the development of the documents.

www.tuckerlaw.com8

Design Professional Agreement Fee basis

If based on cost of work, define elements If stipulated sum, define scope, allowances, limits, etc

Additional services Duration of hourly rates Define what constitutes additional services Control

Require prior notice Explanation of need Estimate of additional compensation Impact on or adjustment to schedule Advance written approval

www.tuckerlaw.com9

Design Professional Agreement Change orders – impact on fees / costs

Design professionalOwner requested additionsUnforeseen conditionsErrors and omissions – no lost workErrors and omissions – lost work

www.tuckerlaw.com10

Design Professional Agreement Add and deduct alternates

District control Impact on fees

Reimbursable expenses Define Markup Limits / allowances

www.tuckerlaw.com11

Design Professional Agreement Ownership and use of design documents

Right of continued use to complete project Right of use as information for future maintenance,

additions and renovations Licensing fee for continued use if design professional

terminated Termination Rights

For cause and/or for convenience Termination fees Continued use of work product

Revision by subsequent design professionalwww.tuckerlaw.com

12

Contractor Agreement - Scope of Work Ambiguity leads to disputes

Owner has broad interpretation while contractor has narrower interpretation

Owner expects higher standard of quality of materials while contractor anticipated lower standard of quality

Proprietary specification and substitutions Design specification vs. performance specification

Design specification – materials and methods specified Performance specification – objective specified and

contractor obligated to attain result

www.tuckerlaw.com13

Contractor Agreement - Scope of Work Scope defined by design professional work

product Bloomsburg Mills v. Sordini Construction, 164 A.2d

201 (Pa. 1960) – plans and specifications provided by architect are warranted to be free from defects and fit for their intended purpose

U.S. v. Spearin, 248 U.S. 132 (1918) – if contractor builds strictly according to plans and specifications, he is not responsible for defective results BUT – if contractor knows or reasonably should know of

defects, he has a duty to provide notice prior to building

www.tuckerlaw.com14

Contractor Agreement – Other Issues Delivery of organized project documentation Assignment of sales tax refund rights Simplify and expedite owner remedies to stop or

perform work Require prompt notice, detail, itemization and

documentary support for claims Termination rights

www.tuckerlaw.com15

Contractor Agreement – Other Issues Waiver of consequential damages

Home office overhead Limit use of measured mile, Eichleay and Manshul

formulae Loss of bonding capacity Lost profits

www.tuckerlaw.com16

Time Limitations on ClaimsAIA Document B101 (Owner-Architect Agreement)ARTICLE 8 CLAIMS AND DISPUTES§ 8.1 GENERAL§ 8.1.1 The Owner and Architect shall commence all claims

and causes of action, whether in contract, tort, or otherwise, against the other arising out of or related to this Agreement in accordance with the requirements of the method of binding dispute resolution selected in this Agreement within the period specified by applicable law, but in any case not more than 10 years after the date of Substantial Completion of the Work.

www.tuckerlaw.com17

Time Limitations on ClaimsAIA Document A201 (General Conditions)§ 13.7 TIME LIMITS ON CLAIMSThe Owner and Contractor shall commence all claims and causes of action, whether in contract, tort, breach of warranty or otherwise, against the other arising out of or related to the Contract in accordance with the requirements of the final dispute resolution method selected in the Agreement within the time period specified by applicable law, but in any case not more than 10 years after the date of Substantial Completion of the Work.

www.tuckerlaw.com18

It is Good to be King Time limitations on owner claims

Nullum tempus occurrit regi (“no time runs against the king”)

Standardized provisions may require claims to be brought within the applicable statute of limitation or time period specified by applicable lawOutcome: Nullum tempus doctrine waivedSolution: Expressly reserve nullum tempus

doctrine

www.tuckerlaw.com19

Separations Act of 1913 24 P.S. § 7-751 (School); 53 P.S. §1003

(Municipal) and 71 P.S. §1618 (State) Requires separate contracts for plumbing,

electrical and HVAC scopes of work for projects exceeding $4,000

www.tuckerlaw.com20

What is plumbing?

www.tuckerlaw.com21

Separations Act of 1913 Wheels Mechanical vs. West Jefferson Hills SD

Issue involved site utility work within general contractor work scope – main water line, storm sewer and sanitary sewer

Long-standing (but unwritten precedent) that “plumber’s work” ends at a point 5 feet from the building and does not extend beyond 5 feet outside of the building envelope

Judge O’Reilly opinion – “if water flows through it” Commonwealth Court opinion

www.tuckerlaw.com22

Payment Disputes Withholding of payment for improper

performance Defective work not remedied Damage to completed work, work of others or other

owner property Third party claims Failure to pay subcontractors and materialmen

Joint checks Payment bonds

www.tuckerlaw.com23

Payment Disputes Pennsylvania Procurement Code

Retainage Maximum at 10%; reduced to 5% at 50% completion 150% of potential liability to another prime contractor

Withholding for deficiency items “according to terms of the contract” Notice to contractor within the time period specified in the

contract or 15 calendar days of the date that the application for payment is received.

www.tuckerlaw.com24

Payment Disputes Contractual or statutory interest Penalty of 1% per month for amounts withheld in

bad faith Attorneys’ fees to prevailing party for bad faith Bad faith = arbitrary or vexatious Withholding requires:

Good faith basis Itemization of cost or good faith estimate of cost of

completion or correction

www.tuckerlaw.com25

Delay Claims Liquidated damages No damages for delay provisions

Failure to provide extension of time Affirmative interference or failure to perform

essential act are bases for liability of owner Common bases of claims:

Lack of coordination of multiple contractors Inadequate plans and specifications Late or incomplete approvals

www.tuckerlaw.com26

Delay Claims Types / elements of delay damages

Extended general conditions Direct additional labor costs Extended home office overhead Material and wage escalation costs Idle equipment

www.tuckerlaw.com27

Dispute Resolution Agreement should specify dispute resolution

procedures Default is traditional court litigation

Architect / engineer initial review / decision Mediation Arbitration Litigation

www.tuckerlaw.com28

Dispute Resolution Arbitration vs. litigation – considerations:

Time Arbitration typically speedier Limited appeal rights eliminate process that can delay

finality

www.tuckerlaw.com29

Dispute Resolution Arbitration vs. litigation – considerations:

Flexibility Litigation controlled by statutory / procedural rules Arbitration process can use established rules (e.g.,

American Arbitration Association) Contract can establish rules (limited discovery rights,

prehearing disclosures, level of detail in arbitrator’s award etc.)

www.tuckerlaw.com30

Dispute Resolution Arbitration vs. litigation – considerations:

Cost Arbitration often less costly, primarily due to limited

pretrial proceedings while, in court litigation, significant expense devoted to discovery and motion practice

Cost differential decreasing as discovery processes becoming more prevalent in arbitration

www.tuckerlaw.com31

Dispute Resolution Arbitration vs. litigation – considerations:

Pre-hearing discovery Witness depositions, interrogatories, document

productions available through civil court rules Extensive pre-hearing discovery may not be available

in arbitration Trial by surprise vs. cost of discovery

www.tuckerlaw.com32

Dispute Resolution Arbitration vs. litigation – considerations:

Arbitrator / Judge / Jury Arbitrator selected by parties; judge assigned to parties Same arbitrator involved with pre-hearing disputes; in some

courts, no individual judge assigned to case before trial Expertise may vary

Arbitrator typically has construction industry experience Judge may or may not have relevant case experience A jury – to quote the philosopher Forrest Gump – “is like

a box of chocolates. You never know what you're gonna get.“

www.tuckerlaw.com33

Dispute Resolution Arbitration vs. litigation – considerations:

Appeal rights Pennsylvania standard of review highly deferential to arbitrator

award. “[A]rbitrators are the final judges of both law and fact, and an award will not be reviewed or set aside for mistake in either.“ Patriotic Order Sons of Am. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 157 A. 259, 262 (Pa. 1931).

Under Pennsylvania law, award subject to reversal only for fraud, misconduct, corruption or other irregularity

Federal Arbitration Act allows a court to set aside an arbitration award that manifestly disregards the law or fails the test of fundamental rationality.

Agreement must specify application of FAA or else Pennsylvania standard applies

www.tuckerlaw.com34

Dispute Resolution Suggestions:

Include contract language that allows the school district to select arbitration or litigation depending on the claim

Include contract language that establishes desired pre-hearing procedures for arbitration

Include contract language that elects between Pennsylvania common law or Federal Arbitration Act standard of review

www.tuckerlaw.com35

www.tuckerlaw.com36