View
3
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
THE INFLUENCE OF LONG-TERM NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON SYMBIOSIS AND METABOLISM IN THE
LEGUME-RHIZOBIUM MUTUALISM
BY
BENJAMIN R. GORDON
THESIS
Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements
for the degree of Master of Science in Plant Biology
in the Graduate College of the
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2015
Urbana, Illinois
Master’s Committee:
Associate Professor Tom Jacobs, Chair, Director of Research
Associate Professor Rachel J. Whitaker
Associate Professor Rebecca C. Fuller
ii
ABSTRACT
Understanding how mutualisms evolve in response to a changing environment will be critical for
predicting the long-term impacts of global changes, such as increased nitrogen (N) deposition. Bacterial
mutualists in particular might evolve quickly, thanks to short generation times and the potential for
independent evolution of plasmids through recombination and/or horizontal gene transfer (HGT). In a
previous work using the legume/rhizobia mutualism, we demonstrated that long-term nitrogen
fertilization caused the evolution of less-mutualistic rhizobia. Here, I used two approaches to investigate
the influence of long-term nitrogen fertilization on symbiosis and metabolism in Rhizobium. First, I used
63 of our previously isolated rhizobium strains in comparative phylogenetic and quantitative genetic
analyses to determine the degree to which variation in partner quality is attributable to phylogenetic
relationships among strains versus recent genetic changes in response to N-fertilization. I found
evidence of distinct evolutionary relationships between chromosomal and pSym genes, and broad
similarity between pSym genes. We also find that nifD has a unique evolutionary history that explains
much of the variation in partner quality, and our results implicate MoFe subunit interaction sites in the
evolution of less-mutualistic rhizobia. Second, I determined metabolic fingerprints from our Rhizobium
isolates and integrated them with data on symbiotic quality and previously determined phylogenies,
revealing that N-fertilization significantly contributed to our observed variation in metabolic capacity.
Despite a weak general relationship between metabolism and partner quality, importantly, there appear
to be functionally significant relationships between certain C-substrates and partner quality.
These results provide insight into the evolution of less-cooperative rhizobia in response to long-
term N-fertilization, which significantly contributed to observed variation in partner quality and
metabolic capacity. Nonsynonymous substitutions in nifD appear to be major contributors to variation in
iii
partner quality. Metabolic profile generally correlates poorly with partner quality, as does individual
metabolite utilization. However, there is a relationship between functional significance of certain C-
substrates and partner quality.
iv
DEDICATION
This thesis is dedicated to the loving memory of my mother
Joey, a model of strength and compassion
who passed away from cancer on Oct. 21, 2011.
v
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank my research advisor Katy Heath for giving me fast-turnarounds on every
draft, for teaching me to focus on the question, and particularly for fostering my love of science. I thank
my committee members for all their help and suggestions, in particular Rebecca Fuller for entertaining
my microbial perspective in a megafauna world and Rachel Whitaker for lending her ear to my bacterial
bagatelles. I would also like to thank Tom Jacobs for acting as my committee chair at the eleventh hour.
This thesis would not have been possible without the help of many others. I thank Dylan Weese,
Bryn Dentinger, Katy Heath, and Jennifer Lau for previous work which formed the basis of this project. I
thank Christie Klinger for getting me started in the lab and for showing me how to stay organized. I
thank Patricia Burke for teaching me proper microbiological techniques and for always celebrating
discovery with me. I thank my undergraduate assistants, Sarah Carlisle and Taylor Weathers, for their
hard-work, patience, and dedication in the lab. In addition to the aforementioned who also helped
count, I thank Julia Ossler, Jennifer Jones, Kathryn Solórzano Lowell, Matias Fernandez, Mike Grillo,
Justin Podowski, and Leah Caplan for their help in counting seemingly endless root nodules, as nodule
counts range from zero to over 1000 per plant.
The funding for this work was made possible by the Department of Plant Biology, the School of
Integrative Biology, and the Graduate College. This work was supported by NSF DEB-1257938. Support
for this research was also provided by the NSF Long-term Ecological Research Program (DEB 1027253) at
the Kellogg Biological Station.
Finally, and most importantly, I would like to thank my family and friends, whose love and
support drove me to persevere. In particular, I thank my parents Jeff and Joey Gordon who taught me to
have a heart that is full of love, from which I draw strength, willpower, and where I sometimes find
peace.
vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1: GENERAL INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………………………..1
CHAPTER 2: DECOUPLED GENOMIC ELEMENTS SHAPE THE EVOLUTION OF PARTNER QUALITY IN R.
LEGUMINOSARUM BV. TRIFOLII…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..6
CHAPTER 3: RHIZOBIUM LEGUMINOSARUM BV. TRIFOLII STRAINS ADAPT METABOLISM IN THE
INCIPIENT DECLINE OF SYMBIOSIS.……………………………………………………………………………………………..…..….19
FIGURES AND TABLES………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….30
REFERENCES….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….41
1
CHAPTER 1: GENERAL INTRODUCTION
Mutualisms, cooperative partnerships between species, are among the most prevalent and
economically important biological interactions, having diverse roles in the maintenance of biodiversity
and nutrient cycling (Stachowicz 2001). Despite the apparent long-term stability of many mutualistic
relationships, models predict that mutualisms should be extremely susceptible to the invasion of less-
beneficial genotypes that give less than they take from their symbiotic partners (West et al. 2007),
leading to mutualism breakdown (Sachs et al. 2004; Holland and DeAngelis 2010). Such mutualism
breakdown might be exacerbated under global change (Six 2009; Kiers et al. 2010), as mutualism serves
to tie the fate of multiple species to a common destiny, and the potential breakdown of their
interactions (from mutualism to antagonism or mutualism abandonment) could lead to an acceleration
of global change and extinction.
The global nitrogen (N) cycle is being drastically altered by fossil fuel combustion and modern
agricultural practices, with N-rich fertilizers adding millions of tons of N globally, surpassing levels of
natural N addition. Nitrogen is an essential component of many constituents of living matter such as
proteins. Unlike other nutrients that are essential to maintaining soil fertility such as potassium or
phosphate, nitrogen is not a significant product of mineral weathering. To be biologically available,
atmospheric nitrogen must be broken apart and recombined with other elements in a process called
nitrogen fixation. This flow is not spontaneous, and is naturally driven by two work intensive processes:
lightning strikes and via enzymes in N-fixing bacteria. Lightning releases heat while passing through the
atmosphere, and this heat converts atmospheric nitrogen to nitrogen oxides. Despite the frequency of
lightning strikes, on the order of 100 times per second, only a small portion of total nitrogen fixation is
achieved in this manner. The vast majority of environmental nitrogen fixation is performed by living
organisms. In the soil, nitrogen fixing bacteria such as rhizobia convert molecular nitrogen to ammonia,
2
which is then converted to ammonium. It is possession of the enzyme nitrogenase that allows rhizobia
to split atmospheric nitrogen, which is the first step in fixing nitrogen.
While N-fixing soil bacteria generate ~ 97% of non-anthropogenically fixed N in terrestrial
ecosystems (Brockwell et al., 1995), N-rich fertilizers add millions of metric tons of N to the earth,
surpassing levels of natural N addition. It is estimated that up to 50% of deposited N is lost to surface
and ground waters, the atmosphere, and uncultivated soils (Vitousek 1997; Vitousek et al. 1997; Smil
2002). Anthropogenic nitrogen (N) deposition is detrimental to natural communities with effects
spanning from decreased biodiversity (Tilman 1987; Clark and Tilman 2008) to coastal dead zones arising
from eutrophication (Diaz and Rosenberg 2008). Moreover these increases in N availability are predicted
to cause the breakdown of a resource mutualism of major ecological and economic importance – that
between legumes (plants in the family Fabaceae) and symbiotic rhizobia (Rhizobiales) (N-fixing soil
bacteria).
N is a key traded resource in the legume-rhizobium mutualistic symbiosis; theory predicts that
excess N will destabilize the legume-rhizobium mutualism and lead to the evolution of less-cooperative
rhizobia through several potential selective mechanisms (Akçay and Simms 2011). First, N-deposition
should weaken positive fitness feedbacks between N-fixation and rhizobium fitness, because plant
fitness (and its feedback on rhizobium fitness) is no longer dependent on symbiotically-fixed N (West et
al. 2002). Second, because legumes are known to limit nodulation when fixed N is available from the
abiotic environment, as previously data has shown empirically (Kiers et al., 2006), N-deposition could
result in a prolonged free-living soil phase for these non-obligate, infectiously acquired bacteria (Sprent
and Sutherland 1987). A shift in the prominent lifestyle phase could, in turn, either select for free-living
traits at the expense of partner quality, or simply allow the accumulation of mutations detrimental to
the mutualism (Sachs et al. 2011). Finally, N deposition might disrupt the stabilizing mechanisms by
which legumes are thought to maintain high partner quality in rhizobia (e.g., sanctions, partner fidelity
3
feedback, partner choice); see discussions in (Oono et al. 2009; Frederickson 2013; Heath and
Stinchcombe 2014). In essence, in an environment where N is no longer a limiting factor, legumes might
cease to select for high-quality strains because additional fixed N will have limited benefits for plants.
Bacterial mutualists are excellent models for studying the evolution and breakdown of
cooperation in changing environments, and for microbial adaptation in general. Bacteria are
experimentally tractable, have short generation times, and harbor relatively small genomes, simplifying
the detection of evolutionary responses (Elena and Lenski 2003). Ecological shifts in taxonomic
composition and/or abundance have been shown to occur within natural bacterial communities in
response to changing environments (Allison and Martiny 2008; Logares et al. 2013; Newton et al. 2013;
Youngblut et al. 2013a). Yet despite ecological evidence/investigations, we still lack fundamental
knowledge on how bacteria found in natural settings evolve in response to environmental changes.
Whether adaptation entails genome-wide sweeps (the “ecotype model”) or site-specific sweeps
(classical models of adaptive evolution) remains controversial (Polz et al. 2013). While adaptive variants
in bacteria can arise from point mutations (Stallforth et al. 2013), bacteria can also evolve rapidly via
recombination by horizontal gene transfer (HGT), a process by which foreign DNA is acquired by an
organism. By incorporating genetic segments, whole genes, or even plasmids into their genome,
bacteria need not rely on point mutation for new alleles (Osborn et al., 2000). As a result, HGT can
accelerate the process of plasmid, ergo genome, evolution (Ochman et al. 2000; Norman et al. 2009). In
addition, environmental factors such as soil type, soil moisture, and temperature have been shown to
increase rates of HGT in closely monitored culture conditions (Richaume 1989), thereby facilitating rapid
evolutionary responses to environmental stress (Jain et al. 2003; Beaber et al. 2004). Studying how
rhizobial mutualists respond to novel environments informs both global change predictions as well as
our nascent understanding of bacterial adaptation.
4
Rhizobial genes necessary for symbiosis with legumes (“symbiosis genes”) typically exist on a
symbiosis plasmid (pSym) separate from the main chromosome (Mazur and Koper 2012). Recent work
by Tian et al. showed that while the rate of recombination was lower than the rate of mutation in
Bradyrhizobium and Sinorhizobium, recombination (compared to point mutation) played a larger role in
shaping their overall diversity (Tian et al., 2012), and recent data suggest a high rate of HGT of rhizobial
plasmids (Epstein et al. 2012). Additionally, in Tian et al., 2012 they were specifically looking at
differences between species while it has previously been shown that differences among strains of the
same species are as great as those between species (Ormeno-Orrillo and Martínez-Romero, 2012), they
used Bradyrhizobium which lack symbiotic plasmids (Cytryn et al., 2008; Hahn and Hennecke, 1987;
Haugland and Verma, 1981), as well as using Sinorhizobium where reduced variability has previously
been observed in their plasmid profiles (López-Guerrero et al., 2012). A review of rhizobia plasmid
population structure showed that the relationship between the pSym and the chromosome could be
either clonal or panmictic, depending on the case (Souza and Eguiarte, 1997). A study of an undisturbed
population of rhizobia indicated that a tight association between the pSym and chromosome is more
relavant to natural populations, and that a panmictic structure would be more relavant to populations
that have been heavily influenced by man or under human selection (Wernegreen et al., 1997). Sachs et
al. (2010) sequenced symbiosis genes for a collection of nodulating and non-nodulating Bradyrhizobium
isolates from Lotus strigosus and found that poorly effective strains were most closely related to strains
isolated from another host genus (Lupinus), suggesting recent HGT of symbiosis genes, despite the lack
of symbiotic plasmids in Bradyrhizobium and the reduced variability observed in Sinorhizobium plasmid
profiles.
In a previous study (Weese et al., 2015), we compared strains of Rhizobium leguminosarum
(hereafter “rhizobia”) isolated from replicate long-term ecological research (LTER) field plots fertilized
with N for 22 years to those from adjacent unfertilized control plots. Consistent with theoretical
5
predictions that N-fertilization should cause the evolution of less cooperative rhizobia, we found that
clover plants (Trifolium spp.) inoculated with rhizobia from N plots (N rhizobia) yielded less plant
biomass, produced fewer leaves, and lower chlorophyll content than plants inoculated with control (C)
rhizobia (Weese et al., 2015). Analysis of a phylogeny formed from the internal transcribed spacer (ITS)
region between the 16S and 23S rRNA genes showed that clades were comprised of both C and N
strains, suggesting that the evolution of reduced cooperation stemmed from microevolutionary changes
such as point mutation and/or HGT rather than an ecological shift in community composition.
My thesis research has focused on understanding the influence of long-term nitrogen
fertilization on the symbiotic and metabolic capabilities of Rhizobium. Utilizing data from a natural
community of bacteria and long-term ecological research plots provided a perfect opportunity to
investigate the ecological (i.e. community shifts) and evolutionary processes responsible for N-driven
mutualism decline in this system. In chapter two, I investigate whether symbiosis marker genes share
similar evolutionary histories, and if they correlate with partner quality. My third chapter investigates
whether there is phylogenetic signal present in metabolism, if metabolic profile correlates with partner
quality, and whether or not strains cluster by treatment. By leveraging model-based, phylogenetic, and
quantitative genetic approaches, I am able to identify major contributors to variation in symbiotic
quality and potential relationships between functional significance of certain carbon substrates and
symbiotic quality.
6
CHAPTER 2: DECOUPLED GENOMIC ELEMENTS SHAPE THE EVOLUTION OF PARTNER QUALITY IN R. LEGUMINOSARUM BV. TRIFOLII1
Abstract
Understanding how mutualisms evolve in response to a changing environment will be critical for
predicting the long-term impacts of global changes, such as increased nitrogen (N) deposition. Bacterial
mutualists in particular might evolve quickly, thanks to short generation times and the potential for
independent evolution of plasmids through recombination and/or horizontal gene transfer (HGT). In a
previous work using the legume/rhizobia mutualism, we demonstrated that long-term nitrogen
fertilization caused the evolution of less-mutualistic rhizobia. Here, we use our 63 previously isolated
rhizobium strains in comparative phylogenetic and quantitative genetic analyses to determine the
degree to which variation in partner quality is attributable to phylogenetic relationships among strains
versus recent genetic changes in response to N-fertilization. We find evidence of distinct evolutionary
relationships between chromosomal and pSym genes, and broad similarity between pSym genes. We
also find that nifD has a unique evolutionary history that explains much of the variation in partner
quality, and our results implicate MoFe subunit interaction sites in the evolution of less-mutualistic
rhizobia. These results provide insight into the mechanisms behind the evolutionary response of rhizobia
to long-term N-fertilization, and we discuss the implications of our results on adaptation in the
mutualism.
1 Gordon, B., Klinger, C., Lau, J., Weese, D., Dettinger, B., Burke, P., Heath, K. (2015) Decoupled Genomic Elements Shape the Evolution of Partner Quality in Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
7
Introduction
Nitrogen (N) is an essential nutrient for all known life (Sterner and Elser 2002), and N availability
is a major determinant of ecology in terrestrial communities (Craine 2009; Grman et al. 2010). The
global N cycle is being drastically altered by fossil fuel combustion and modern agricultural practices,
with N-rich fertilizers adding millions of tons of N globally, surpassing levels of natural N addition
(Canfield et al. 2010). It is estimated that up to 50% of anthropogenic N, which includes reduced N such
as fertilizers and oxidized N such as atmospheric pollution, is lost to water, the atmosphere, and
uncultivated soils (Vitousek 1997; Vitousek et al. 1997; Smil 2002). The ecological effects of this N
deposition are detrimental to natural communities, ranging from decreases in biodiversity (Tilman 1987;
Clark and Tilman 2008) to coastal dead zones arising from eutrophication (Diaz and Rosenberg 2008).
Furthermore, increases in N availability are predicted to cause the breakdown of a resource mutualism
of major ecological and economic importance – that between legumes (plants in the family Fabaceae)
and symbiotic rhizobia (Rhizobiales).
Mutualisms, cooperative partnerships between species, are among the most prevalent and
economically important biological interactions, having diverse roles in the maintenance of biodiversity
and nutrient cycling (Stachowicz 2001). Despite the apparent long-term stability of many mutualistic
relationships, models predict that mutualisms should be extremely susceptible to the invasion of less-
beneficial genotypes that give less than they take from their symbiotic partners (West et al. 2007),
leading to mutualism breakdown (Sachs et al. 2004; Holland and DeAngelis 2010). Such mutualism
breakdown might be exacerbated under global change (Six 2009; Kiers et al. 2010). This prediction arises
from a large body of work indicating that mutualisms are quite context-dependent, making cost-benefit
ratios for partner fitness, and ultimately mutualism stability, highly-contingent upon the surrounding
environmental conditions (Bronstein 1994; Chamberlain et al. 2014). Moreover because partner species
often have very different physiologies, phylogenic origins, and environmental responses, interaction
8
frequencies might also shift in response to a rapidly changing environment and lead to mutualism
breakdown (Sachs and Simms 2006).
Leguminous plants obtain N by pairing with soil bacteria called rhizobia, which are housed in
root nodules and therein fix atmospheric dinitrogen (N2) to ammonium (NH4+) in exchange for plant
photosynthates. Given that N is a key traded resource in this mutualistic symbiosis, theory predicts that
excess N will destabilize the legume-rhizobium mutualism and lead to the evolution of less-cooperative
rhizobia through several potential selective mechanisms (Akçay and Simms 2011). While host control
mechanisms that favor cooperative rhizobium partners have been shown to remain active in high N, at
least in the short-term (Kiers et al. 2006; Regus et al. 2014), it is acknowledged that long-term studies
are needed to understand how the mutualism evolves when exposed to increased N over many
generations. Indeed in a recent study, Weese et al. (2015) demonstrated that populations of Rhizobium
leguminosarum bv. trifolii (Rlt) were less beneficial for their clover host plants after long-term exposure
(22 years) to N fertilizer, and moreover that these N-evolved versus control strains were not
phylogenetically distinct (i.e., were not separate, monophyletic lineages). Nevertheless the evolutionary
processes leading to this phenotypic differentiation were not investigated.
Rhizobia are excellent models for studying the evolution and breakdown of cooperation in
changing environments, and for microbial adaptation in general. Bacteria are experimentally tractable,
have short generation times, and harbor relatively small genomes, simplifying the detection of
evolutionary responses (Elena and Lenski 2003). Ecological shifts in taxonomic composition and/or
abundance have been shown to occur within natural bacterial communities in response to changing
environments (Allison and Martiny 2008; Logares et al. 2013; Newton et al. 2013; Youngblut et al. 2013).
Yet despite recent investigations, we still lack fundamental knowledge on how bacterial populations in
nature evolve in response to environmental changes. While adaptive variants in bacteria can arise from
point mutations (Stallforth et al. 2013), bacteria can also evolve via recombination, or by horizontal gene
9
transfer (HGT) (Gogarten et al. 2002; Ochman & Moran 2001), ‘the non-genealogical transmission of
genetic material from one organism to another’ (Goldenfeld & Woese 2007), potentially facilitating
rapid evolutionary responses to environmental stress (Jain et al. 2003; Beaber et al. 2004). If
recombination is infrequent compared to mutation, then the entire genome should sweep to fixation
along with a newly selected locus (i.e., the “ecotype model” (Koeppel et al. 2008)); by contrast, frequent
recombination in natural bacterial populations could break up the linkage between selected and other
loci (i.e., similar to classical models of eukaryotic adaptive evolution). Existing data on recombination
within and among genomic elements in rhizobia is mixed (Orozco-Mosqueda et al. 2009), and moreover
depends on the phylogenetic scale analyzed. Some studies have found congruent phylogenies consistent
with a general lack of recombination at the species level in contrast to abundant recombination at the
population level (Wernegreen et al. 1997; Kumar et al. 2015), while others have found a high level of
consistency between the chromosome and symbiosis plasmids even at the population scale
(Wernegreen and Riley 1999; Bailly et al. 2007; Epstein et al. 2012). Studies of other microbial species
suggest that recombination is abundant (Reno et al. 2009; Cadillo-Quiroz et al. 2012; Shapiro et al. 2012;
Held et al. 2013), and that the occurrence of genome-wide sweeps is rare (Polz et al. 2013).
In rhizobia the genes necessary for nodulation (nod) and N-fixation (nif and fix) usually reside
either on a symbiosis plasmid (pSym) or as part of a genomic symbiosis island (SI), and in Rlt they have
previously been shown to localize to the pSym (López-Guerrero et al. 2012; Ormeño-Orrillo and
Martínez-Romero 2013). The ability to fix N in rhizobia is derived from nitrogenases, which constitute a
class of complex enzymes that catalyze biological nitrogen fixation by reducing dinitrogen to ammonia.
Rlt possess the commonly studied Mo-dependent nitrogenase which is primarily composed of a
heterotetrameric MoFe-core encoded by nifD and nifK that catalyzes the reduction of nitrogen to
ammonia, and a dinitrogenase reductase Fe-subunit encoded by nifH that provides electrons to
nitrogenase and ATP-derived energy for catalysis (Stacey et al. 1992; O’Carroll and Dos Santos 2011).
10
Previous studies have found evidence that nifH has a different history of horizontal gene transfer from
the nifDK enzyme core and that genetic divergence of nifH and 16S rRNA genes does not commonly
correlate well for microbial species (Gaby and Buckley 2014). Haukka et al. (1998) concluded that the
phylogeny of nifH was generally inconsistent with 16S, but was broadly similar to that of nod genes.
Indeed, phylogenetic trees based on sequences of nod genes are generally not congruent with those
based on 16S rDNA sequences, but the nod trees show some correlation with host plant range
(Wernegreen and Riley 1999).
The extent to which sequence divergence accounts for recent phenotypic change should differ
between marker loci, with strong phylogenetic signal near causative loci; moreover, the degree to which
genome-wide (versus unlinked/site-specific) sweeps contribute to phenotypic divergence should be
reflected by the degree to which all loci in the genome display phylogenetic signal. Here we use the
collection of N-evolved and control R. leguminosarum strains previously isolated from the long-term N-
deposition experiment at the Kellogg Biological Station LTER site (Weese et al. 2015) in phylogenetically-
informed generalized linear mixed-models and comparative phylogenetic analyses to determine the
congruence between strains of Rlt based on pSym genes and the chromosomal internal transcribed
spacer (ITS) region that lies between the 16S and 23S rRNA genes, and to estimate evolutionary
relationships among N-evolved and control strains. We chose nifD and nifH as markers of nitrogen
fixation, and the nodD-A spacer as a marker of nodulation genes. If nif explains the majority of partner
quality variation, this would suggest that a reduction in N-fixation efficiency has driven changes in
partner quality. Alternatively, if nod explains the majority of partner quality variation, this would imply
that a host range shift has driven the decrease in partner quality. Finally, the degree to which these loci
are congruent is illustrative of the relative importance of recombination and HGT on their evolution.
11
Methods
Study system and sequencing: Briefly, our study focuses on a collection of Rhizobium
leguminosaurum bv. trifolii strains (from Weese et al. 2015) previously isolated from a long-term N-
deposition experiment at the Kellogg Biological Station LTER site (Huberty et al. 1998). In previous work,
we performed a single-inoculation experiment in which three species of clover were inoculated with 63
strains isolated from either N-fertilized (28 strains) or control plots (35 strains). Rhizobium strains from
N-fertilized plots were of lower mutualistic partner quality (i.e., they resulted in plants with fewer leaves
and biomass and lower chlorophyll content). See Weese et al. (2015) for full methods on rhizobium
isolations and quantitative trait phenotyping. Each strain was grown in TY (Vincent 1970) liquid media
prior to DNA extraction via the Qiagen Gentra Puregene Yeast/Bacteria kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Three
loci from the pSym-located symbiosis island were amplified via PCR: nifH and nifD, which encode
dinitrogenase reductase and the α-subunit of dinitrogenase (which are the key components of the
nitrogenase enzyme complex), respectively, and the nodD-A region, which spans the intergenic region of
nodD and nodA genes. PCR was performed using the GoTaq PCR protocol (Promega) and successfully
amplified samples were sequenced at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign W. M. Keck Center
for Sanger sequencing. All ambiguous base calls were manually confirmed using Sequencher 5.1 (Gene
Codes Corporation 2012). The ascension number for NifD used in the protein alignment is
YP_009081007 (Rhizobium leguminosaurum bv. trifolii) (Miller et al. 2007). All sequences were aligned
and phylogenies constructed using Seaview 4.5.3 (Gouy et al. 2010) with MUSCLE (Edgar 2004) and
default alignment options. Maximum likelihood trees were constructed in PhyML3 using the GTR model,
without invariable sites, optimized across site rate variation, NNI tree search and a BioNJ starting tree
with optimized topology; branch support was determined using the SH-like approximate likelihood-ratio
test (aLRT).
12
Phylogenetic and mixed model analyses: Unless otherwise noted, all tests of congruence and
recombination were implemented using R (R Core Team 2013). We first used the Shimodaira-Hasegawa
likelihood ratio test (Shimodaira and Hasegawa 1999), SH.test() in package phangorn (Schliep 2011),
which tests the null hypothesis of congruence by comparing the node log likelihood values from two
maximum likelihood phylogenetic reconstructions. Next, we applied a Procrustes Approach to
Cophylogeny (PACo) analysis (Balbuena et al. 2013) implemented in the ape and vegan packages
(Paradis et al. 2004; Oksanen et al. 2013) to provide a measure of topological congruence by assessing
the degree to which one phylogenetic distance matrix predicts another (i.e., is significantly better than
random).
Briefly, using packages adephylo, ape, and phylobase (Paradis et al. 2004; Jombart et al. 2010;
Bolker et al. 2013), we utilized phylo4d() to combine our phylogenies and data set to visually assess the
distribution of partner quality on the phylogenies. Finally to visually assess whether incongruence was
restricted to a particular clade or region of the tree, we formed tanglegrams using the software
Dendroscope 3 (Scornavacca et al. 2011; Huson and Scornavacca 2012). The amount of tangle, or the
degree to which lines cross, is a rough approximation of topological incongruence, and while
tanglegrams ignore support values on the trees, they allow a determination of whether incongruence
segregates by region or clade.
We used phylogenetic generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) to estimate the proportion of
rhizobium partner quality variation attributable to phylogenetic variation (i.e., linked to the phylogenetic
marker locus) versus the recent N fertilization treatment (i.e., changes elsewhere in the genome in
response to N fertilization). This analysis, implemented using the MCMCglmm package in R (Hadfield
and Nakagawa 2010), jointly estimates the effects of a phylogenetic distance matrix and other variables
on quantitative trait variation (chlorophyll content, leaf number, root mass, shoot mass, and stolon
number), similar to the “animal model” of quantitative genetics (Wilson et al. 2010). We ran separate
13
models that included N treatment and either the ITS phylogeny or the pSym phylogenies. We followed
the recommendations specified by Hadfield (2010, 2012) and Villemereuil et al. (2012) for stipulating the
MCMCglmm priors by dividing the observed phenotypic variance evenly between the effects (the
phylogeny and N treatment), with a shape parameter of 1 (weak, to account for phylogenetic
uncertainty), and using 1,000,000 iterations with a sample interval of 50 and a burn-in of 100,000.
GLMM trace plots were free of pattern, and autocorrelation among samples calculated between
iterations were all less than 0.1, indicating that the model had performed well (Hadfield 2010).
Results
Our analyses of phylogenetic congruence among the four loci indicate recombination among
loci, but suggest that, despite the very different patterns of partner quality variation, the pSym loci are
more congruent with each other compared to the ITS. Of the three pSym loci, nifD/nifH are the least
congruent, with nifH/nodD-A most congruent in PACo, and nifD/nodD-A most congruent via the SH test
(Leigh et al. 2011). The SH test rejected congruence for all pairwise comparisons of loci in our study
(Table 1), consistent with among-locus recombination. The PACo test, however, supported congruence
among the pSym genes, but incongruence between the ITS and each of the three pSym genes (Table 1).
Finally, tanglegrams comparing the ITS to pSym loci show a high degree of entanglement and
comparisons with nifD indicate that incongruence is primarily confined to a pair of clades or regions of
the tree (Figure 1), whereas tanglegrams comparing among pSym genes appear less tangled (Figure 2).
Phylogenetic resolution at the pSym loci may be hampered by limited taxon sampling due to PCR failure
(nifD: 55/63; nifH: 54/63; nodD-A: 37/63), and increased sampling would likely improve phylogenetic
accuracy. We hypothesize that PCR failure was due to gene loss, either of the specific locus, SI, or
plasmid in its entirety.
14
We found that partitioning of partner quality variation depended considerably on the locus
analyzed. The N fertilization treatment explained the majority of rhizobium partner quality for nearly all
models that included the ITS, nifH, and nodD-A phylogenies (Figure 3). These findings would suggest that
loci elsewhere in the genome (i.e., apart from these three marker loci) have changed in response to N
fertilization. Conversely, in our analysis of nifD, phylogeny explained the vast majority of partner quality
variation (Figure 3), and two clades of generally high and low quality stand out when partner quality is
mapped to the tips of the tree (Figure 4), potentially implicating genetic changes within nifD in partner
quality variation.
Using an amino acid alignment of nifD with the reference, we determined that the reference
along with all of the strains from the high quality clade have a methionine at residue 244, whereas all of
the strains from the low quality clade possess a tyrosine. Residue 244 is a MoFe subunit interaction site,
and previous studies have shown that changes to these sites can alter an organism’s ability to fix N
(Brigle et al. 1987). Additionally, strain 116 which stands out as a low quality member of a high quality
subclade, is the only strain in the clade that possesses a mutation at residue 100, which is another MoFe
subunit interaction site.
In contrast to the other partner quality traits (leaf number, stolon number, and plant biomass),
the ITS phylogeny accounted for a large proportion (23.4%) of the variance in chlorophyll content (Figure
3); moreover, including N treatment in the model of chlorophyll content did not improve model fit
(Table 1). These results suggest that causative loci underlying variation in partner chlorophyll content
might be linked to the ITS region, most likely somewhere on the chromosome.
Discussion
Mutualisms are thought to be susceptible to anthropogenic change, although the ecological and
evolutionary processes that drive mutualism decline are not yet understood. Microbes are key players in
15
many important mutualisms, including the N-fixing legume-rhizobium symbiosis; therefore,
understanding the evolution of rhizobium partner quality in natural populations can shed light on the
evolution of bacteria in nature and the maintenance of mutualisms in general. Building on our previous
phenotypic analysis (Weese et al. 2015), which indicated that rhizobia from N-fertilized plots were less-
beneficial symbionts of clover, we compared evolutionary histories of four gene sequences (one on the
chromosome and three pSym genes) with phylogenetic mixed modelling to investigate the evolutionary
process underlying the observed reductions in partner quality. Our results indicate that the ITS region
and the pSym have different evolutionary histories and relationships with rhizobium partner quality, but
that patterns for chlorophyll content differed from other measures of partner quality. Our results differ
from expectations under the ecotype model with zero recombination, but do suggest significant
phylogenetic signal in partner quality, particularly at nifD, but also the ITS for chlorophyll content. We
discuss these main results below.
Our findings indicate both phylogenetic signal and N treatment contribute to among-strain
variation in partner quality, and thus implicate evolutionary changes in response to experimental N
treatments as well as among-lineage variation for mutualism. Given the results of our quantitative trait
modeling and various analyses of congruence/coevolution, however, it appears that the pSym and the
chromosome have different evolutionary histories. By contrast, more congruence among the three
pSym genes suggests that these genes are in partial linkage and that they are more likely to move as a
functional unit. An alternative explanation is that phylogenetic uncertainty is driving incongruence, as
coevolving genes that lack in phylogenetic signal may appear incongruent due to random noise
(Zaneveld et al. 2008). Given previous work showing that rhizobium symbiosis plasmids are self-
transmissible (Bittinger et al. 2000) and that novel symbiosis islands can confer a strong selective
advantage (Parker 2012; Horn et al. 2014), it is possible that recombination or lateral gene transfer of
the pSym across ITS backgrounds has led to the differing signals in the various loci.
16
What do our data suggest about the evolutionary process leading to partner quality decline in
high N plots? Because we find evidence for both phylogenetic signal at our marker loci (particularly at
nifD) and unlinked evolutionary changes in response to N treatment, we can reject a strict one-to-one
relationship between phylogeny and partner quality and thus strict clonal evolution. Nevertheless the
correct interpretation of these findings regarding the evolutionary process that has occurred during the
last 22 years depends somewhat on the age of these rhizobium lineages, compared to the length of the
ecological experiment. On the one hand, if the phylogenetic signal in our dataset predates the LTER
treatments (1988), our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that a combination of lineage sorting
(changes in abundance of pre-existing lineages) and microevolutionary changes has driven the
difference in partner quality between N-evolved and control plots. On the other hand, if these lineages
have diversified since the N treatments were first established, then our findings would suggest that
particular lineages have increased in frequency along with adaptive changes in partner quality. Another
interpretation would be that 22 years is not long enough for complete lineage sorting of recent
substitutions. Given current best estimates of point mutation rates in bacteria (Wielgoss et al. 2011), we
would expect approximately four mutations over the course of our 22 year experiment, yet we find 19
informative sites, which implies that the phylogenetic signal predates the LTER treatment. Nevertheless,
all three scenarios imply a mix of clonality and recombination consistent with other recent studies of
bacteria in nature (Feil et al. 2001; Hanage et al. 2006; Narra and Ochman 2006; Pérez-Losada et al.
2006; Vos and Didelot 2009).
Our results showing that the nifD phylogeny accounts for the vast majority of variation in
partner quality suggests a causal relationship between the locus and measures of partner quality,
particularly given the lack of variation accounted for by phylogeny at nifH or nodD-A. This finding is
consistent with the known importance of nifD in the mutualism (Hennecke 1990; Spaink et al. 1998),
and previous studies of MoFe subunit interaction sites (Brigle et al. 1987), where mutations or deletions
17
lead to drastic changes in the efficiency of N-fixation. Brigle et al. (1987) found that mutations at MoFe
subunit interaction sites can lead to normal, slow, or no growth, with ancillary expression of nif-specific
components was unaffected, and normal levels of both MoFe subunits accumulated in mutants.
While we are unable to rule out the possibility of linked loci elsewhere on the plasmid, it should
be noted that there is divergent signal between nifD versus the structurally adjacent nifH/nodD-A
despite evidence of coevolution, which implies a lack of causally-linked loci near our markers. The
contribution of chromosomal loci is inconclusive based on sequencing the ITS alone. Understanding
which loci determine partner quality and underlie the difference between N-evolved and control
rhizobia will require genome-wide sequencing, which is currently ongoing. Our current evidence implies
that HGT has played a role in contributing to the reduction in partner quality in N fertilized strains.
Specifically, our findings suggest that conjugative transfer of the pSym and subsequent homologous
recombination of nifD might be a mechanism of HGT, consistent with previous findings on the
architecture and nature of rhizobial plasmids (Mercado-Blanco and Toro 1996; Herrera-Cervera et al.
1998; Ding et al. 2013).
Interestingly, the ITS phylogeny accounted for considerable variance in chlorophyll content
(>23.4%), a key measure of partner quality; this was quite different from other measures of partner
quality, where phylogeny never accounted for >3.2% of variation in partner quality. This finding
seemingly contrasts with the fact that chlorophyll content and other measures of partner quality are
correlated among strain means (chlorophyll content ~ shoot mass, r2=0.87, p < 0.0001; chlorophyll
content ~ leaf number, r2=0.80 p < 0.0001). Partner quality traits are quantitative, varying more-or-less
continuously among strains (Weese et al. 2015); therefore, these complex phenotypes are likely to be
underlain by multiple loci, some of which might contribute more to some traits than others. Our findings
might suggest that the ITS region is in partial linkage with loci that are important in determining plant
chlorophyll content, but more work would be needed to test this hypothesis.
18
Conclusion
Here, we have found that nifD explains much of the variation in partner quality, and we
implicate MoFe subunit interaction sites as the primary driver of reduction in partner quality. We find
that the phylogenies of pSym genes are not consistent with the phylogeny of the ITS region, but are
broadly similar to each other. These results suggest HGT of nifD despite the role of recombination in the
pSym. Further sequencing will be required to determine if additional changes throughout the genome
have driven reductions in partner quality, and to elucidate the role of recombination and HGT on whole-
genomes.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NSF DEB-1257938. Support for this research was also provided by
the NSF Long-term Ecological Research Program (DEB 1027253) at the Kellogg Biological Station and by
Michigan State University AgBioResearch. The authors thank Charles Roseman for thoughtful comments
on a draft version of the manuscript and Elida Iniguez for help with DNA preparation and sequencing.
Sequence data will be archived in Genbank and our phylogenies in TreeBASE. The authors declare no
conflict of interest.
19
CHAPTER 3: RHIZOBIUM LEGUMINOSARUM BV. TRIFOLII STRAINS ADAPT METABOLISM IN THE INCIPIENT DECLINE OF SYMBIOSIS 2
Abstract
The legume-rhizobium mutualism is one of the most ubiquitous and productive mutualisms in
nature. Nitrogen (N) is a key traded resource in the legume-rhizobium mutualistic symbiosis, and with
the global N cycle being drastically altered by fossil fuel combustion and modern agricultural practices,
theory predicts that excess N will destabilize the legume-rhizobium mutualism and lead to the evolution
of less-cooperative rhizobia through several potential selective mechanisms. A shift in lifestyle could
subsequently select for free-living traits such as increased carbon utilization at the expense of partner
quality. Previously, in work by my lab and collaborators, we demonstrated that populations of
Rhizobium were less beneficial for their clover host plants after long-term exposure (22 years) to N
fertilizer, and moreover that these N-evolved versus control strains were not phylogenetically distinct.
Here, our approach, whose aim was to determine metabolic fingerprints from R. leguminosaurum bv.
trifolii isolates and integrate them with data on symbiotic quality and previously determined
phylogenies, revealed that N-fertilization significantly contributed to our observed variation in metabolic
capacity. Despite a weak general relationship between metabolism and partner quality, importantly,
there appear to be functionally significant relationships between certain C-substrates and partner
quality.
2 Gordon, B., Heath, K. (2015) Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii Strains Adapt Metabolism in the Incipient Decline of Symbiosis Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
20
Introduction
The legume-rhizobium mutualism is widespread and productive in nature. Rhizobia live inside
specialized structures on legume roots called nodules. Once the nodule has formed, rhizobia
differentiate into bacteroids that fix atmospheric nitrogen (N) to ammonia in exchange for
photosynthates from the plant. N-fixing bacteria account for ~97% of all N fixed in natural terrestrial
ecosystems, although they now account for less than 50% globally, due to the combustion of fossil fuels
and the application of N-rich fertilizers. The ecological effects of this N deposition are detrimental to
natural communities, ranging from decreases in biodiversity (Tilman 1987; Clark and Tilman 2008)
Despite the long-term apparent stability (~100mya) of the mutualism (Soltis et al. 1995; Doyle 2011),
numerous models predict the mutualism should be susceptible to invasion by bacterial genotypes who
are less efficient than their neighbors (aka, cheaters), leading to mutualism breakdown. Such mutualism
breakdown might be exacerbated under global change, such as long-term N-fertilization.
Theory predicts that excess N will destabilize the legume-rhizobium mutualism and lead to the
evolution of less cooperative rhizobia through several potential mechanisms (Akçay and Simms 2011),
one of which is context-dependency. Because legumes are known to limit nodulation when fixed N is
available from the abiotic environment, as previous data has shown empirically (Kiers et al. 2006), N-
deposition could result in a prolonged free-living soil phase for these non-obligate, infectiously acquired
bacteria (Sprent and Sutherland 1987). A shift in the prominent lifestyle phase could, in turn, either
select for free-living traits such as increased carbon utilization at the expense of partner quality, or
simply allow the accumulation of mutations detrimental to the mutualism (Sachs et al. 2011). With a
prolonged saprobic phase, we might see a move towards increased specialization among the N strains,
to take advantage of an alternate niche, or alternatively, we might find evidence of a move towards
increased generalization to cope with the compounding stresses associated with a free-living lifestyle.
21
Metabolism of carbon and other energy sources is one of several key factors that contribute to
rhizobial fitness, such as colonization of the rhizosphere and nodule occupancy (Yost et al. 2006;
Ormeño-Orrillo et al. 2008; Ramachandran et al. 2011; Ding et al. 2012). Carbon metabolism traits have
previously been shown to be localized in plasmids in Rhizobium spp. (López-Guerrero et al. 2012; Mazur
and Koper 2012), and plasmids have been shown to confer significant metabolic flexibility to rhizobia,
which is key component of both adapting to varying soil conditions and competing for nodule occupancy
(Wielbo et al. 2010; Mazur et al. 2013). Despite significant research in the area, knowledge of how
accessory genes and the functional relationships between plasmids shape the phenotype and
metabolism of bacteria is poorly understood.
In previous work, Weese et al. (2015) demonstrated that populations of Rhizobium
leguminosarum bv. trifolii (Rlt) were less beneficial for their clover host plants after long-term exposure
(22 years) to N fertilizer, and moreover that these N-evolved versus control strains were not
phylogenetically distinct (i.e., were not separate, monophyletic lineages). Here, we investigated whether
N-evolved rhizobia differ from control rhizobia in terms of their ability to metabolize a range of
substrates (i.e., their “metabolic profile”) while in the free-living state, and more generally whether
partner quality variation among rhizobium strains correlates with metabolic profile variation. By
analyzing individual metabolic profiles at the strain level, and then comparing the results across groups,
we were able to determine whether there is a relationship between metabolism and partner quality, if
free-living or saprobic states were under increased selection among N-fertilized plots as compared with
control plots, if genome size is correlated with metabolic capacity and whether N-fertilization
significantly contributed to our observed variation in metabolic capacity.
Methods
Study system and Rlt Strains.
22
Full methods for rhizobium isolations and quantitative trait phenotyping can be found in Weese
et al. (2015). Utilizing bacteria isolated from N-fertilized and control plots at the KBS LTER site (6
replicate plots per treatment; Huberty et al. 1998) , Weese et al. (2015) used a series of common garden
greenhouse experiments and found that N-fertilized strains phenotypically differentiated from control
strains. N-evolved strains were, on average, less beneficial for host plants, as evidenced by their hosts’
lower leaf number, biomass, stolon number and chlorophyll content. Moreover, these phenotypic
differences were genetically-determined and the result of evolutionary shifts in mean trait values within
a population, rather than shifts in microbial community composition (Weese et al., 2015; Gordon et al.,
unpublished). We leverage the strain mean trait values in the quantitative analyses below.
Metabolic profiling using Biolog.
We compared the metabolic profiles of N-evolved (28 strains) to control (35 strains) Rlt using
the GN2 MicroPlate phenotypic microarray system of Biolog (Hayward, CA). GN2 MicroPlates are 96-well
microtiter plates containing prefilled and dried selected nutrients and biochemicals along with
Tetrazolium violet, a redox dye used to colormetrically indicate the utilization of carbon sources (source
for this – the website or manual?). Thus each GN2 MicroPlate allows the simultaneous screening of
microbial utilization or oxidation of 95 different carbon sources (plus one control well containing only
dye). Previously characterized Rlt isolates were plated on agar tryptone yeast (TY) media and grown until
colonies became visible (48-72 hrs). Individual colonies were then used to inoculate 20 mL of liquid TY
media and incubated shaking at 28°C until turbid (24-48 hrs). Cells from the liquid culture were spun
down and washed twice with of 20 mL of sterile H2O (Heraeus Multifuge X1 Centrifuge Series, TX-400
Swinging Bucket Rotor, 24° C, 5 minutes, and 4700 × g).
23
One GN2 MicroPlate experiment was performed on each strain using recommended Biolog
protocols, with the following modification: To account for the slow growth of Rlt, washed/pelleted cells
derived from liquid culture were diluted with sterile H2O to an optical density (OD550) of 0.1
(approximately 108 cells/ml), and 150 μl suspension of rhizobia was inoculated into each well.
Microplates were then incubated overnight (16-24 hours) at 28° C, and absorbance at 450 and 620 nm
of each well was measured using Sunrise™ microplate reader (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland). To
control for any plate-level variation in inoculation density, OD values were corrected using background
color developed in the least fluorescent well (aka, control well, A1).
Sequencing.
See Klinger (2015) for complete methods. Briefly, Genomic DNA was extracted using a modified version
(http://friesen.plantbiology.msu.edu/?p=133) of the MasterPure™ DNA Purification Kit (Epicentre).
Libraries were generated using the Nextera XT DNA Sample Prep Kit (lllumina, San Diego, CA) and
quantified with a Qubit fluorometer 2.0 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) prior to normalization.
Normalized libraries were sequenced on a HiSeq2000 sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA) at the W.M.
Keck Center for Comparative and Functional Genomics at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
The A5 pipeline (Tritt et al. 2012) with default parameters was used to assemble genomes. Assembled
genomes were annotated using the RAST server (Aziz et al. 2008) and genes from annotated assemblies
analyzed utilizing the ITEP toolkit (Benedict et al. 2014).
Statistical Analysis.
24
Unless otherwise noted, all calculations and analyses were performed in R (R Core Team 2013).
Using the corrected OD values from the Biolog microplate wells, we analyzed the data in two ways. We
first coded substrate utilization in the Biolog plates as binary data, with wells showing 25% greater
fluorescence than the control well (OD > (1.25 * Control well (A1))) considered positive (1), and anything
less negative (0). Second we analyzed the continuously-varying corrected OD values after normalizing so
that each plate summed to 1.
To estimate the variability of experimental effects including batch, a principal variance
component analysis (PVCA) was used. This approach leverages a principal component analysis (PCA) to
reduce data dimension and maintain variability in the data, followed by a variance components analysis
(VCA) fits a mixed linear model using factors of interest as random effects to estimate and partition the
total variability. The PVCA approach was used to determine which sources of variability (Biological, N-
fertilization, batch or plot of origin) are most prominent in our Biolog data set. Using the eigenvalues
associated with their corresponding eigenvectors as weights, associated variations of all factors are
standardized and the magnitude of each source of variability (including each batch effect) is presented
as a proportion of total variance. To determine which traits were informing the variation attributable to
N-fertilization, one‐way ANOVAs were performed to assess appreciable differences (P < 0.1) in C-
substrate utilization between N-evolved and control strains.
The relationships between the utilization of various C-substrates and the symbiotic quality of
strains was studied using principle component analyses (PCAs), followed by regression analyses.
Hierarchical clustering was then performed on all strains using pvlcust() (Suzuki and Shimodaira 2006)
with absolute corrected distances and complete clustering. Using a phylogeny constructed from whole
genome core SNP data (Klinger et al., unpublished), along with the continuous matrix and symbiotic
quality data from previous, the degree to which utilization of a given C-substrate or symbiotic quality is
25
structured on the tree was determined using a phylogenetic principle component analysis (pPCA)
(Jombart et al. 2010a,b).
Results and Discussion
N-fertilization has Driven Metabolic Variation.
Using a principle variance component analysis (PVCA), we determined that N treatment of origin
(N-fertilized or control) accounted for 13.6% (Table 2) of the overall metabolic variance in our dataset.
The vast majority of the remaining variation was accounted for by inherent among-strain variance in
metabolism, while spatial variation (plot nested within treatment) explained only 3.7% of the variation
in metabolism. We followed this multivariate analysis with univariate ANOVAs to investigate which
individual metabolites might be driving this among-treatment variance. Only six C-substrates were
appreciably influenced (alpha<0.1) by N treatment of origin: Glycogen, Tween 40, Adonitol, i-Erythritol,
Bromosuccinic Acid, and L-Pyroglutamic Acid (Table 3). Thus on the one hand, our multivariate results
suggest a strong role of N-fertilization history in shaping current rhizobium metabolism; on the other
hand, few individual substrates differ strongly between N-fertilized and control strains. These findings
suggest that small differences in metabolism across several substrates must account for our PVCA
results.
All of the aforementioned C-substrates are commonly encountered within the soil, and previous
research has indicated that their utilization plays a role in the legume-rhizobia symbiosis, as well as
being a piece of the fingerprint of disturbed environments. The differential utilization of glycogen has
been previously shown to influence and enhance symbiotic performance (Marroqui et al., 2001). The
ability to utilize adonitol and i-erythritol has been shown to lie on the same locus in S. meliloti (Geddes
and Oresnik, 2012), and to be plasmid localized (Yost et al., 2006), allowing for horizontal
26
transmissibility. Differential utilization of adonitol resulted in reduced ability to compete for nodule
occupancy (Yost et al., 2006), which is a crucial determinant of fitness among symbiotic rhizobia. Natural
homologues of Tween-40 can be found within the soil, and are known to affect biofilm formation, ergo,
bacterial aggregation. The ability to aggregate on legume roots in response to flavonoid excretion by the
plant is critical for infection, and therefore nodule occupancy, so the ability to breakdown Tween-40 and
similar compounds can be key in the establishment of the sybmiosis, and can therefore be critical in
determining rhizobial fitness.
In addition to being a key determinant of rhizbobial fitness, Tween-40 utilization has been
shown to vary in R. psuedoryzae and R. halophytocola in response to environmental disturbance (Zhang
et al., 2011; Bibi et al., 2012). The utilization of bromosuccinic acid, as well as L-Pyroglutamic acid have
both been shown to be highly correlated with microbial diversity in environments with applied
“toxicants” (Tate III and Rogers, 2002). This relationship appears to hold true for anthropogenic N-
fertilization, as we have previously noted that diversity has been greatly affected in the N-fertilized plots
(Weese et al., 2015). It may be worth noting that the utilization of these three C-substrates (Tween-40,
Bromosuccinic acid, L-Pyroglutamic Acid) could be considered primary components of the fingerprint
associated with N-fertilized environments. While partial fingerprints have been determined for certain
particular applied “toxicants,” such as heavy metals, and other environmental disturbances, the
fingerprints of many common disturbances remain as yet undetermined. Compiling a library of
fingerprints resulting from environmental disturbances would allow for quick tests to determine many
aspects of soil status, such as general community composition, health, and function.
Lack of Ecotype Redefinition.
27
While we found that a history of N-fertilization has played a significant role in shaping rhizobium
metabolic variance, treatment does not appear to have driven the formation of distinct metabolic
niches, since we do not observe distinct groups based on treatment or partner quality in the hierarchical
clustering analysis. We found three significant clusters, all of which contain both N-fertilized and
unfertilized strains of mixed partner quality (Figure 5). Moreover, when comparing the total number of
C-substrates utilized among N-fertilized and unfertilized strains, we find that the make-up and
distribution of the two groups is nearly identical (Figure 5, Table 4). These findings are consistent with
the above results suggesting that minor changes in metabolism of several substrates likely underlies the
multivariate response of metabolism to N fertilization. It is perhaps not surprising that N-evolved and
control strains are not entirely differentiated, given the 22-year timescale of N-fertilization in this
experiment and the previous observation that the phylogenies of N and control strains are intermixed
(suggesting frequent recombination between groups; Weese et al., 2015; Gordon et al., unpublished).
Genome size and metabolism are not correlated.
We found that overall genome size has no relationship to the total number C-substrates that
strains were able to utilize (r2= -0.00067; Figure 6). We considered genome size to be the complete set
of genes contained within an individual strains genome, using a binary presence/absence matrix. In
neither case did we find that there was any significant relationship with the number C-substrates utilized
with genome size. The tightly packed nature of the bacterial genome leads to a correspondence
between genome size and proportional variation in amount of genes (Gregory 2005). These variations
create a wide functional range, with smaller genomes that tend to correspond to obligatory mutualists
or pathogens (Koonin and Wolf 2008) and larger bacterial genomes that correspond to species that
28
handle diverse environments and encode complex developmental processes (Konstantinidis and Tiedje
2004). Here, we find a considerable amount of metabolic variation with proportionally little variation in
genome content. This really serves to reiterate how inadequate our current knowledge is concerning
how extrachromosomal elements and the functional relationships between these replicons shape the
phenotype and metabolism of the bacterial cell.
It is clear from the results of the pPCA that the utilization of C-substrates is not purely vertically
transmitted (Figure 7). The utilization of C-substrates runs the full gamut from highly structured on the
phylogeny, to indistinguishable from Brownian motion, all the way to highly unstructured on the
phylogeny. While clonal descent tends to leave strong phylogenetic signal, explaining Brownian motion
on the phylogeny, as well as a complete lack of phylogenetic structure is less clear cut. In either case,
horizontal gene transfer of extrachromosomal elements could create some of our observed patterns. An
alternate explanation is that enough time has passed to erase any record of phylogenetic signal, as a
result of differential linkage and selection pressures over time.
Conclusion
Here, we asked if there is phylogenetic signal present in metabolism, does metabolic profile
correlate with partner quality, and do strains cluster by treatment? By determining metabolic
fingerprints from R. leguminosaurum bv. trifolii isolates and integrating them with data on symbiotic
quality and phylogenies, we revealed that N-fertilization significantly contributed to our observed
variation in metabolic capacity. While N-fertilized and control strains do not generally differ in their
total utilization of C-substrates, metabolic profile generally correlates poorly with partner quality, as
does individual metabolite utilization. Importantly, despite the weak general relationship between C-
29
substrate utilization and partner quality, there is a relationship between functional significance of
certain C-substrates and partner quality.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NSF DEB-1257938. Support for this research was also provided by
the NSF Long-term Ecological Research Program (DEB 1027253) at the Kellogg Biological Station and by
Michigan State University AgBioResearch. The authors thank Patricia Burke for providing a microplate
reader, Surangi Punyasena for use of her centrifuge, Stephen Downie for use of his shaking incubator
and Justin Podowski for help inoculating microplates. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
30
FIGURES AND TABLES
Table 1: SH-test/PACo results – Pairwise comparisons of congruence among loci; values closer to 0 represent improved fit. Upper right: SH-test – ln L diff; Lower left: PACo – m^2 = lack-of-fit. Sig. code: *** < 0.001, ** < 0.01, * < 0.05, " " > 0.5
Locus ITS nifD nifH nodD
ITS 7127 *** 4237 *** 4372 ***
nifD 0.256 3939 *** 995 ***
nifH 0.272 0.036 *** 1479 ***
nodD 0.202 0.021 ** 0.007 ***
31
Figure 1: Tanglegram, ITS/nifD – A tanglegram highlighting patterns of phylogenetic variation between the ITS and nifD phylogenies. Strains in blue represent poor partners and strains in red represent superior partners visually identified from trait-mapping. Bootstrap support values >0.70 have been projected onto the trees.
33
Figure 3: Mosaic plot, GLMM attributable variance – The percent of variance attributable to phylogenetic relationships versus N fertilization treatment. Black: variation attributable to phylogeny; Grey: variation attributable to N fertilization; White: residual variance.
34
Figure 4: Bullseye plot, nifD/Partner Quality – (A.) Fan phylogeny of nifD with measure of partner quality mapped to the tips. Traits, from inside out: shoot mass, leaf number, stolon number, and chlorophyll content. Darker colors represent values that are further away from the mean, with blue indicating below the mean (-) and red indicating above the mean (+). Strains from two clades are highlighted: the clade in blue is predominantly below the mean, while the clade in red is predominantly above the mean. (B.) Amino acid alignment of residues 241-250 of nifD, with a MoFe subunit interaction site (residue 244) outlined in red; the same strains are highlighted as above.
35
Table 2: PVCA – The proportion of variance from the first principle component, which accounts for 97.04586 percent of the total variation in the data, attributable to either the plot of origin, nitrogen fertilization treatment, and residual genetic variation.
Effects Weighted Average Proportion Variance
Treatment/Plot 0.037
Treatment 0.136
Residual 0.827
36
Table 3: ANOVA tables for carbon (C) substrates where utilization differed between treatments. C-substrates with a p-value<0.1 are shown; * indicate C-substrates that varied significantly (p-value<0.05) between treatments. Caution should be exercised when interpreting these results, as all values fail to meet significance after FDR adjustment, so they may be considered marginally significant at best.
C-substrate Sum Sq Df Mean Sq F-value P-value
Glycogen*
Treatment 3.00243e-05 1 3.00243e-05 5.31142 0.026199
Plot 2.90383e-05 10 2.90383e-06 0.51370 0.870738
Error 2.37417e-05 42 5.65278e-06
Tween 40
Treatment 8.41298e-06 1 8.41298e-06 3.06867 0.08711
Plot 8.63783e-06 10 8.63783e-07 0.31507 0.97288
Error 1.15146e-04 42 2.74157e-06
Adonitol*
Treatment 0.00005155 1 5.51550e-05 6.36836 0.01549
Plot 0.00010833 10 1.08334e-05 1.25086 0.28867
Error 0.00036375 42 8.66078e-06
i-Erythritol
Treatment 2.52464e-05 1 2.52464e-05 2.85912 0.09827
Plot 1.62471e-04 10 1.62471e-05 1.83996 0.08280
Error 5.19437e-04 42 8.83014e-06
Bromosuccinic Acid
Treatment 0.000132605 1 1.32605e-04 2.95500 0.09298
Plot 0.000529883 10 5.29883e-05 1.18080 0.33057
Error 0.001884746 42 4.48749e-05
L-Pyroglutamic Acid
Treatment 8.01214e-05 1 8.01214e-05 3.25712 0.07829
Plot 4.19281e-04 10 4.19281e-05 1.70447 0.11165
Error 1.03315e-03 42 2.45989e-05
37
Figure 5: Hierarchical clustering of principle components 1 and 2, which account for approximately 50% of metabolic variance; N-fertilized strains are in blue and unfertilized strains in red, with green dots highlighting poor mutualists and orange dots highlighting quality mutualists. Three significant clusters are formed: cluster 1=yellow, cluster 2=green and cluster 3=purple.
38
Table 4: Metabolic Fingerprints in total numbers of substrates utilized, by Treatment-Group and broken down by substrate type.
Total Substrates Sugars Acids Amino Acids Others
N-fertilized 70 31.88 16 18.24 3.88
Unfertilized 67.28571429 30.77142857 15.65714286 17.6 3.257142857
Percent Difference 1.040339703 1.036025998 1.02189781 1.036363636 1.19122807
39
Figure 6: Scatterplot of total gene content in R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii against the number of carbon substrates they could successfully utilize. Overlain in green is the simple linear regression line.
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Tota
l Ge
ne
Co
nte
nt
C-substrates utilized
40
Figure 7: Phylogeny derived from whole-genome sequence data (Klinger et al., unpublished) with carbon-substrate utilization mapped to the tips. Each column (1-96) represents a well (A1-H12) from the Biolog GN2 microplate (Hayward, CA)The size of circle represents the degree away from the mean, with white below the mean and black above the mean.
41
REFERENCES Akçay, E., and E. L. Simms. 2011. “Negotiation, sanctions, and context dependency in the legume-
Rhizobium mutualism.” Am. Nat. 178(1):1–14. doi: 10.1086/659997.
Allison, S. D., and J. B. H. Martiny. 2008. “Resistance, resilience, and redundancy in microbial
communities.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105(Suppl 1):11512-11519. doi:
10.1073/pnas.0801925105. Epub 2008 Aug 11.
Aziz, R. K., D. Bartels, A. A. Best, M. DeJongh, T. Disz, R. A. Edwards, K. Formsma, et al. 2008. “The RAST
Server: Rapid Annotations Using Subsystems Technology.” BMC Genomics 9:75. doi:
10.1186/1471-2164-9-75.
Bailly, X., I. Olivieri, B. Brunel, J.-C. Cleyet-Marel, and G. Béna. 2007. “Horizontal gene transfer and
homologous recombination drive the evolution of the nitrogen-fixing symbionts of Medicago
species.” J. Bacteriol. 189(14):5223–5236. doi: 10.1128/JB.00105-07. Epub 2007 May 11.
Balbuena, J. A., R. Míguez-Lozano, and I. Blasco-Costa. 2013. “PACo: a novel procrustes application to
cophylogenetic analysis.” PLoS One 8(4):e61048. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061048. Print
2013.
Beaber, J. W., B. Hochhut, and M. K. Waldor. 2004. “SOS response promotes horizontal dissemination of
antibiotic resistance genes.” Nature 427(6969):72–74. doi: 10.1038/nature02241. Epub 2003
Dec 21.
Benedict, M. N., J. R. Henriksen, W. W. Metcalf, R. J. Whitaker, and N. D. Price. 2014. “ITEP: An
Integrated Toolkit for Exploration of Microbial Pan-Genomes.” BMC Genomics 15(8):1– 11.
doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-8.
Bittinger, M. A., J. A. Gross, J. Widom, J. Clardy, and J. Handelsman. 2000. “Rhizobium etli CE3 carries vir
gene homologs on a self-transmissible plasmid.” Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 13(9):1019–1021.
doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.9.1019.
Bolker, B., M. Butler, P. Cowan, D. de Vienne, D. Eddelbuettel, M. Holder, T. Jombart, S. Kembel, F.
Michonneau, B. O’meara, E. Paradis, J. Regetz, and D. Zwickl. 2013. “phylobase: Base package
for phylogenetic structures and comparative data.” R package version 0.6.8. http://CRAN.R-
project.org/package=phylobase.
Brigle, K. E., R. A. Setterquist, D. R. Dean, J. S. Cantwell, M. C. Weiss, and W. E. Newton. 1987. “Site-
directed mutagenesis of the nitrogenase MoFe protein of Azotobacter vinelandii.” Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84(20):7066–7069.
Brockwell, J., P. J. Bottomley, and J. E. Thies. 1995. “Manipulation of rhizobia microflora for improving
legume productivity and soil fertility: A critical assessment.” Plant Soil 174(1):143–180.
42
Bronstein, J. L. 1994. “Conditional outcomes in mutualistic interactions.” Trends Ecol. Evol. 9(6):214–
217. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(94)90246-1.
Cadillo-Quiroz, H., X. Didelot, N. L. Held, A. Herrera, A. Darling, M. L. Reno, D. J. Krause, and R. J.
Whitaker. 2012. “Patterns of gene flow define species of thermophilic Archaea.” PLoS Biol.
10(2): e1001265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001265. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
Canfield, D. E., A. N. Glazer, and P. G. Falkowski. 2010. “The evolution and future of Earth’s nitrogen
cycle.” Science 330(6001):192–196. doi: 10.1126/science.1186120.
Chamberlain, S., D. P. Vázquez, L. Carvalheiro, E. Elle, and J. C. Vamosi. 2014. “Phylogenetic tree shape
and the structure of mutualistic networks.” J. Ecol. 102(5):1234–1243. doi: 10.1111/1365-
2745.12293.
Clark, C., and D. Tilman. 2008. “Loss of plant species after chronic low-level nitrogen deposition to
prairie grasslands.” Nature 451(7179):712–715. doi: 10.1038/nature06503.
Craine, J. M. 2009. “Resource Strategies of Wild Plants.” Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. ISBN:
9780691139128.
Diaz, R. J., and R. Rosenberg. 2008. “Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems.”
Science 321(5891):926–929. doi: 10.1126/science.1156401.
Ding, H., C. B. Yip, B. A. Geddes, I. J. Oresnik, and M. F. Hynes. 2012. “Glycerol utilization by Rhizobium
leguminosarum requires an ABC transporter and affects competition for nodulation.”
Microbiology 158(Pt 5):1369–1378. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.057281-0. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
Ding, H., C. B. Yip, and M. F. Hynes. 2013. “Genetic characterization of a novel rhizobial plasmid
conjugation system in Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae strain VF39SM.” J. Bacteriol.
195(2):328–339. doi: 10.1128/JB.01234-12. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
Doyle, J. J. 2011. “Phylogenetic perspectives on the origins of nodulation.” Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.
24(11):1289–1295. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-05-11-0114.
Edgar, R. C. 2004. “MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput.”
Nucleic Acids Res. 32(5):1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340.
Elena, S. F., and R. E. Lenski. 2003. “Evolution experiments with microorganisms: the dynamics and
genetic bases of adaptation.” Nat. Rev. Genet. 4(6):457–469. doi: 10.1038/nrg1088.
Epstein, B., A. Branca, J. Mudge, A. K. Bharti, R. Briskine, A. D. Farmer, M. Sugawara, N. D. Young, M. J.
Sadowsky, and P. Tiffin. 2012. “Population genomics of the facultatively mutualistic bacteria
43
Sinorhizobium meliloti and S. medicae.” PLoS Genet. 8(8):e1002868. doi:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1002868. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
Feil, E. J., E. C. Holmes, D. E. Bessen, M. S. Chan, N. P. Day, M. C. Enright, R. Goldstein, D. W. Hood, A.
Kalia, C. E. Moore, J. Zhou, and B. G. Spratt. 2001. “Recombination within natural populations of
pathogenic bacteria: short-term empirical estimates and long-term phylogenetic
consequences.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98(1):182–187.
Gaby, J. C., and D. H. Buckley. 2014. “A comprehensive aligned nifH gene database: a multipurpose tool
for studies of nitrogen-fixing bacteria.” Database 2014:bau001. doi: 10.1093/database/bau001.
Gouy, M., S. Guindon, and O. Gascuel. 2010. “SeaView version 4: A multiplatform graphical user
interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building.” Mol. Biol. Evol. 27(2):221–
224. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp259. Epub 2009 Oct 23.
Gregory, T. R. 2005. “Synergy between sequence and size in large-scale genomics.” Nat. Rev. Genet.
6(9):699–708. doi: 10.1038/nrg1674.
Grman, E., J. A. Lau, D. R. Schoolmaster, and K. L. Gross. 2010. “Mechanisms contributing to stability in
ecosystem function depend on the environmental context.” Ecol. Lett. 13(11):1400–1410. doi:
10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01533.x. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
Hadfield, J. 2010. “MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm
R package.” J. Stat. Softw. 33(2):1-22.
Hadfield, J. D., and S. Nakagawa. 2010. “General quantitative genetic methods for comparative biology:
phylogenies, taxonomies and multi-trait models for continuous and categorical characters.” J.
Evol. Biol. 23(3):494–508. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01915.x. Epub 2010 Jan 7.
Hanage, W. P., C. Fraser, and B. G. Spratt. 2006. “The impact of homologous recombination on the
generation of diversity in bacteria.” J. Theor. Biol. 239(2):210–219. doi:
10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.08.035. Epub 2005 Oct 19.
Held, N. L., A. Herrera, and R. J. Whitaker. 2013. “Reassortment of CRISPR repeat-spacer loci in
Sulfolobus islandicus.” Environ. Microbiol. 15(11):3065–3076. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12146.
Epub 2013 May 22.
Hennecke, H. 1990. “Nitrogen fixation genes involved in the Bradyrhizobium japonicum-soybean
symbiosis.” FEBS Lett. 268(2):422–426. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(90)81297-2.
Herrera-Cervera, J. A., J. M. Sanjuan-Pinilla, J. Olivares, and J. Sanjuan. 1998. “Cloning and identification
of conjugative transfer origins in the Rhizobium meliloti genome.” J. Bacteriol. 180(17):4583–
4590.
44
Holland, J. N., and D. L. DeAngelis. 2010. “A consumer-resource approach to the density-dependent
population dynamics of mutualism.” Ecology 91(5):1286–1295. doi: 10.1890/09-1163.1.
Horn, K., I. M. Parker, W. Malek, S. Rodríguez-Echeverría, and M. A. Parker. 2014. “Disparate origins of
Bradyrhizobium symbionts for invasive populations of Cytisus scoparius (Leguminosae) in North
America.” FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 89(1):89–98. doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12335. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
Huberty, L., K. Gross, and C. Miller. 1998. “Effects of nitrogen addition on successional dynamics and
species diversity in Michigan old‐fields.” J. Ecol. 86:794–803. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745
Huson, D. H., and C. Scornavacca. 2012. “Dendroscope 3: an interactive tool for rooted phylogenetic
trees and networks.” Syst. Biol. 61(6):1061–1067. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys062. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
Jain, R., M. C. Rivera, J. E. Moore, and J. A. Lake. 2003. “Horizontal gene transfer accelerates genome
innovation and evolution.” Mol. Biol. Evol. 20(10):1598–1602. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msg154.
Epub 2003 May 30.
Jombart, T., F. Balloux, and S. Dray. 2010a. “Adephylo: new tools for investigating the phylogenetic
signal in biological traits.” Bioinformatics 26(15):1907–1909. doi:
10.1093/bioinformatics/btq292. Epub 2010 Jun 4.
Jombart, T., S. Pavoine, S. Devillard, and D. Pontier. 2010b. “Putting phylogeny into the analysis of
biological traits: a methodological approach.” J. Theor. Biol. 264(3):693–701. doi:
10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.03.038. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
Kiers, E. T., R. A. Rousseau, and R. F. Denison. 2006. “Measured sanctions: Legume hosts detect
quantitative variation in rhizobium cooperation and punish accordingly.” Evol. Ecol. Res. 8:1077–
1086.
Kiers, T. E., T. M. Palmer, A. R. Ives, J. F. Bruno, and J. L. Bronstein. 2010. “Mutualisms in a changing
world: an evolutionary perspective.” Ecol. Lett. 13(12):1459–1474. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-
0248.2010.01538.x. Epub 2010 Oct 19.
Klinger, C. 2015. “Ecological genomics of mutualism decline in nitrogen-fixing bacteria” (Master's thesis).
Retrieved from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/78425/KLINGER-THESIS-
2015.pdf?sequence=1
Koeppel, A., E. B. Perry, J. Sikorski, D. Krizanc, A. Warner, D. M. Ward, A. P. Rooney, E. Brambilla, N.
Connor, R. M. Ratcliff, E. Nevo, and F. M. Cohan. 2008. “Identifying the fundamental units of
bacterial diversity: a paradigm shift to incorporate ecology into bacterial systematics.” Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105(7):2504–2509. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0712205105. Epub 2008 Feb 12.
45
Konstantinidis, K. T., and J. M. Tiedje. 2004. “Trends between gene content and genome size in
prokaryotic species with larger genomes.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101(9):3160–3165. doi:
10.1073/pnas.0308653100. Epub 2004 Feb 18.
Koonin, E. V., and Y. I. Wolf. 2008. “Genomics of bacteria and archaea: The emerging dynamic view of
the prokaryotic world.” Nucleic Acids Res. 36(21):6688–6719. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn668. Epub
2008 Oct 23.
Kumar, N., G. Lad, E. Giuntini, M. E. Kaye, P. Udomwong, N. J. Shamsani, J. P. W. Young, and X. Bailly.
2015. “Bacterial genospecies that are not ecologically coherent: population genomics of
Rhizobium leguminosarum.” Open Biol. 5(1):140133. doi: 10.1098/rsob.140133.
Logares, R., E. S. Lindström, S. Langenheder, J. B. Logue, H. Paterson, J. Laybourn-Parry, K. Rengefors, L.
Tranvik, and S. Bertilsson. 2013. “Biogeography of bacterial communities exposed to progressive
long-term environmental change.” ISME J. 7(5):937–948. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.168. Epub
2012 Dec 20.
López-Guerrero, M. G., E. Ormeño-Orrillo, J. L. Acosta, A. Mendoza-Vargas, M. A. Rogel, M. A. Ramírez,
M. Rosenblueth, J. Martínez-Romero, and E. Martínez-Romero. 2012. “Rhizobial
extrachromosomal replicon variability, stability and expression in natural niches.” Plasmid
68(3):149–158. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2012.07.002. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
Mazur, A., and P. Koper. 2012. “Rhizobial plasmids — replication, structure and biological role.” Cent.
Eur. J. Biol. 7(4):571–586. doi: 10.2478/s11535-012-0058-8.
Mazur, A., G. Stasiak, J. Wielbo, P. Koper, A. Kubik-Komar, and A. Skorupska. 2013. “Phenotype profiling
of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii clover nodule isolates reveal their both versatile and
specialized metabolic capabilities.” Arch. Microbiol. 195(4):255–267. doi: 10.1007/s00203-013-
0874-x. Epub 2013 Feb 16.
Mercado-Blanco, J., and N. Toro. 1996. “Plasmids in Rhizobia: The Role of Nonsymbiotic Plasmids.” Mol.
Plant Microbe Interact. 9(7):535–545. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-9-0535.
Miller, S. H., R. M. Elliot, J. T. Sullivan, and C. W. Ronson. 2007. “Host-specific regulation of symbiotic
nitrogen fixation in Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar trifolii.” Microbiology 153(Pt 9):3184–
3195. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/006924-0.
Narra, H. P., and H. Ochman. 2006. “Of What Use Is Sex to Bacteria?” Curr. Biol. 16(17):R705–R710. doi:
10.1016/j.cub.2006.08.024.
Newton, R. J., S. M. Huse, H. G. Morrison, C. S. Peake, M. L. Sogin, and S. L. McLellan. 2013. “Shifts in the
microbial community composition of Gulf Coast beaches following beach oiling.” PLoS One
8(9):e74265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074265. eCollection 2013.
46
O’Carroll, I. P., and P. C. Dos Santos. 2011. “Genomic Analysis of Nitrogen Fixation.” Methods Mol. Biol.
766:49-65. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-194-9_4.
Oksanen, J., F. Blanchet, R. Kindt, P. Legendre, P. R. Minchin, R. B. O’Hara, G. L. Simpson, P. Solymos, M.
H. H. Stevens, and H. Wagner. 2014. “vegan: Community Ecology Package.” R package version
2.2-0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.
Ormeño-Orrillo, E., M. Rosenblueth, E. Luyten, J. Vanderleyden, and E. Martínez-Romero. 2008.
“Mutations in lipopolysaccharide biosynthetic genes impair maize rhizosphere and root
colonization of Rhizobium tropici CIAT899.” Environ. Microbiol. 10(5):1271–1284. doi:
10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01541.x. Epub 2008 Feb 27.
Ormeño-Orrillo, E., and E. Martínez-Romero. 2013. “Phenotypic tests in Rhizobium species description:
An opinion and (a sympatric speciation) hypothesis.” Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 36(3):145–147. doi:
10.1016/j.syapm.2012.11.009. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
Orozco-Mosqueda, M. D. C., J. Altamirano-Hernandez, R. Farias-Rodriguez, E. Valencia-Cantero, and G.
Santoyo. 2009. “Homologous recombination and dynamics of rhizobial genomes.” Res.
Microbiol. 160(10):733–741. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2009.09.011. Epub 2009 Oct 8.
Paradis, E., J. Claude, and K. Strimmer. 2004. APE: Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R language.
Bioinformatics 20(2):289–290. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412.
Parker, M. A. 2012. “Legumes select symbiosis island sequence variants in Bradyrhizobium.” Mol. Ecol.
21(7):1769–1778. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05497.x. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
Pérez-Losada, M., E. B. Browne, A. Madsen, T. Wirth, R. P. Viscidi, and K. A. Crandall. 2006. “Population
genetics of microbial pathogens estimated from multilocus sequence typing (MLST) data.”
Infect. Genet. Evol. 6(2):97–112. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2005.02.003. Epub 2005 Mar 24.
Polz, M., E. Alm, and W. Hanage. 2013. “Horizontal gene transfer and the evolution of bacterial and
archaeal population structure.” Trends Genet. 29(3):170–175. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2012.12.006.
Epub 2013 Jan 15.
R Core Team. 2013. “R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.” R Foundation for
Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
Ramachandran, V. K., A. K. East, R. Karunakaran, J. A. Downie, and P. S. Poole. 2011. “Adaptation of
Rhizobium leguminosarum to pea, alfalfa and sugar beet rhizospheres investigated by
comparative transcriptomics.” Genome Biol. 12(10):R106. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-10-r106.
Regus, J. U., K. A. Gano, A. C. Hollowell, and J. L. Sachs. 2014. “Efficiency of partner choice and sanctions
in Lotus is not altered by nitrogen fertilization.” Proc. R. Soc. B 281(1781):20132587. doi:
10.1098/rspb.2013.2587. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
47
Reno, M. L., N. L. Held, C. J. Fields, P. V. Burke, and R. J. Whitaker. 2009. “Biogeography of the Sulfolobus
islandicus pan-genome.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106(21):8605–8610. doi:
10.1073/pnas.0808945106. Epub 2009 May 12.
Sachs, J. L., U. G. Mueller, T. P. Wilcox, and J. J. Bull. 2004. “The evolution of cooperation.” Q. Rev. Biol.
79(2):135–160. doi: 10.1086/383541
Sachs, J. L., and E. L. Simms. 2006. “Pathways to mutualism breakdown.” Trends Ecol. Evol. 21(10):585–
92. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.06.018.
Sachs, J. L., A. C. Hollowell, and J. E. Russell. 2011. “Evolutionary Instability of Symbiotic Function in
Bradyrhizobium japonicum.” PLoS One 6(11):e26370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026370. Epub
2011 Nov 2.
Schliep, K. P. 2011. “phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R.” Bioinformatics 27(4):592–593. doi:
10.1093/bioinformatics/btq706. Epub 2010 Dec 17.
Scornavacca, C., F. Zickmann, and D. H. Huson. 2011. Tanglegrams for rooted phylogenetic trees and
networks. Bioinformatics 27:i248–56.
Shapiro, B. J., J. Friedman, O. X. Cordero, S. P. Preheim, S. C. Timberlake, G. Szabo, M. F. Polz, and E. J.
Alm. 2012. “Population Genomics of Early Events in the Ecological Differentiation of Bacteria.”
Science 336(6077):48–51. doi: 10.1126/science.1218198.
Shimodaira, H., and M. Hasegawa. 1999. “Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to
phylogenetic inference.” Mol. Biol. Evol. 16(8):1114–1116.
Six, D. L. 2009. “Climate change and mutualism.” Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7:686–686. doi:
10.1038/nrmicro2232.
Smil, V. 2002. “Nitrogen and food production: proteins for human diets.” Ambio 31(2):126–131.
Soltis, D. E., P. S. Soltis, D. R. Morgan, S. M. Swensen, B. C. Mullin, J. M. Dowd, and P. G. Martin. 1995.
“Chloroplast gene sequence data suggest a single origin of the predisposition for symbiotic
nitrogen fixation in angiosperms.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92(7):2647–2651. doi:
10.1073/pnas.92.7.2647.
Spaink, H. P., A. Konodorosi, and P. Hooykaas. 1998. “The Rhizobiaceae: Molecular Biology of Model
Plant-Associated Bacteria.” 1st ed. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands. doi:
10.1007/978-94-011-5060-6.
48
Sprent, J. I., J. M. Sutherland, S. M. de Faria, M. J. Dilworth, H. D. L. Corby, J. H. Becking, L. A. Materon,
and J. W. Drozd. 1987. “Some Aspects of the Biology of Nitrogen-Fixing Organisms.” Philos.
Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 317(1184):111–129.
Stacey, G., R. Burris, and H. Evans. 1992. “Biological Nitrogen Fixation.” Chapman and Hall, New York.
ISBN: 978-0-412-02421-4.
Stachowicz, J. J. 2001. “Mutualism, Facilitation, and the Structure of Ecological Communities.”
Bioscience 51(3):235–246. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0235:MFATSO]2.0.CO;2.
Stallforth, P., D. A. Brock, A. M. Cantley, X. Tian, D. C. Queller, J. E. Strassmann, and J. Clardy. 2013. “A
bacterial symbiont is converted from an inedible producer of beneficial molecules into food by a
single mutation in the gacA gene.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110(36):14528–14533. doi:
10.1073/pnas.1308199110.
Sterner, R. W., and J. J. Elser. 2002. “Ecological stoichiometry: The biology of elements from molecules
to the biosphere.” Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. ISBN: 9780691074917.
Suzuki, R., and H. Shimodaira. 2006. “Pvclust: an R package for assessing the uncertainty in hierarchical
clustering.” Bioinformatics 22(12):1540–1542. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl117. Epub 2006
Apr 4.
Tilman, D. 1987. “Secondary succession and the pattern of plant dominance along experimental
nitrogen gradients.” Ecol. Monogr. 57(3):189–214. doi: 10.2307/2937080.
Tritt, A., J. A. Eisen, M. T. Facciotti, and A. E. Darling. 2012. “An Integrated Pipeline for de Novo Assembly
of Microbial Genomes.” PloS One 7(9):e42304. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042304.
Vincent, J. M. 1970. “A Manual for the Practical Study of the Root-Nodule Bacteria.” IBP Handbuch No.
15 des International Biology Program, London. XI u. 164 S., 10 Abb., 17 Tab., 7 Taf. Oxford-
Edinburgh.
Vitousek, P. M., H. A. Mooney, J. Lubchenco, and J. M. Melillo. 1997. “Human Domination of Earth's
Ecosystems.” Science 277(5325):494–499. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5325.494.
Vitousek, P. M., J. D. Aber, R. W. Howarth, G. E. Likens, P. a. Matson, D. W. Schindler, W. H. Schlesinger,
and D. G. Tilman. 1997. “Human Alteration of the Global Nitrogen Cycle: Sources and
Consequences.” Ecol. Appl. 7(3):737–750. doi: 10.1890/1051-
0761(1997)007[0737:HAOTGN]2.0.CO;2.
Vos, M., and X. Didelot. 2009. “A comparison of homologous recombination rates in bacteria and
archaea.” ISME J. 3(2):199–208. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2008.93. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
49
Weese, D. J., K. D. Heath, B. T. M. Dentinger, and J. A. Lau. 2015. “Long-term nitrogen addition causes
the evolution of less-cooperative mutualists.” Evolution, 69(3):631–642. doi:
10.1111/evo.12594.
Wernegreen, J. J., E. E. Harding, and M. A. Riley. 1997. “Rhizobium gone native: unexpected plasmid
stability of indigenous Rhizobium leguminosarum.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94(10):5483–
5488.
Wernegreen, J. J., and M. A. Riley. 1999. “Comparison of the evolutionary dynamics of symbiotic and
housekeeping loci: a case for the genetic coherence of rhizobial lineages.” Mol. Biol. Evol.
16(1):98–113.
West, S. A., A. S. Griffin, and A. Gardner. 2007. “Evolutionary explanations for cooperation.” Curr. Biol.
17(16):R661–R672. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.004.
Wielbo, J., M. Marek-Kozaczuk, A. Mazur, A. Kubik-Komar, and A. Skorupska. 2010. “Genetic and
metabolic divergence within a Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii population recovered from
clover nodules.” Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76(14):4593–4600. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00667-10. Epub
2010 May 14.
Wielgoss, S., J. E. Barrick, O. Tenaillon, S. Cruveiller, B. Chane-Woon-Ming, C. Médigue, R. E. Lenski, D.
Schneider, B. J. Andrews. 2011. “Mutation rate inferred from synonymous substitutions in a
long-term evolution experiment with Escherichia coli.” G3 1(3):183–186. doi:
10.1534/g3.111.000406.
Wilson, A. J., D. Réale, M. N. Clements, M. M. Morrissey, E. Postma, C. A. Walling, L. E. B. Kruuk, and D.
H. Nussey. 2010. “An ecologist’s guide to the animal model.” J. Anim. Ecol. 79(1):13–26. doi:
10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01639.x.
Yost, C. K., A. M. Rath, T. C. Noel, and M. F. Hynes. 2006. “Characterization of genes involved in
erythritol catabolism in Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae.” Microbiology 152(Pt 7):2061–
2074. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.28938-0.
Youngblut, N. D., M. Dell’aringa, and R. J. Whitaker. 2013. “Differentiation between sediment and
hypolimnion methanogen communities in humic lakes.” Environ. Microbiol. 16(5):1411–1423.
doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12330. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
Zaneveld, J. R., D. R. Nemergut, and R. Knight. 2008. “Are all horizontal gene transfers created equal?
Prospects for mechanism-based studies of HGT patterns.” Microbiology 154(Pt 1):1–15. doi:
10.1099/mic.0.2007/011833-0.
Recommended