View
215
Download
1
Category
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
This is a lot of stuff about Keyboard Warriors.
Citation preview
Blake Dickey
Writ 1133
Dr. Kara Taczak
October 20th, 2015
Primary Research Report on “Keyboard Warriors”
I have found many secondary sources thus far pertaining to the nature and actions of the
infamous “Keyboard Warriors”. However, a vast majority of them lack the hard raw data to
back up their claims. Many of the sources I have found are articles from newspapers discussing
current events relating to a particular controversial political topic, and usually including a
description of the responses from Keyboard Warriors, both negative and positive… mostly
negative. I did, however, find a few published works that provided studies done on them. Still,
even in these descriptions they fail to discuss much of the actual content posted by Keyboard
Warriors, and really only mention the levels of audacity and passion that they perpetuate.
Additionally, many of the articles I have found, were written by authors living in a variety of
different countries. The pro of this being that it allows me to assess the consistency of Keyboard
Warriors worldwide. It has been difficult finding sources that directly discuss or acknowledge
the American Keyboard Warriors.
One source I found was an article in the technical publication, “CSI: Communications”
from CSI (Computer Society of India), in which they made a distinction between trolls and
Keyboard Warriors. In this particular section, they went over and discussed some of the cyber
laws relating to trolls in India. A “troll” is defined in the article as a subtype of Keyboard
Warriors, trolls use the shield of anonymity to express their inner aggressions online. Mentioned
in the article was one study, done by the canadian school University of Manitoba, that found
“...trolls exhibit the personality traits of narcissists, psychopaths and sadists – taking pleasure in
the suffering of others and lacking remorse or empathy for their victims.” (Mali. P, pgs. 3637).
This is of course referring to the more malevolent subset of Keyboard Warriors, representing the
extremes on both sides. This is useful in that it sheds some light on the depth of the term
Keyboard Warrior, saying that there are different subtypes of them. This source is also useful
because it backs up its findings and claims with credible studies, as well as using those studies to
help describe and draw some conclusions about trolls. However, this same article does also
express some views and descriptions that would be considered to be “ignorant” or “dated” in the
United States. For instance, the motivators that trolls are said to have for “trollling” include,
“...having an abusive childhood, Mental illness / Mental Health Problems, Homosexuals in
denial, Social Outcasts or are Sexual Predators.” (Mali. P, pgs. 36). In the modern United States,
making attributions like these about someone’s behavior would be very looked down upon.
According to this article, India has even gone so far as to making laws that outlaw trolling. They
did so by making it illegal to really post or message anything offensive via computer or
communication device, punishable by 3 years of imprisonment. I will be using this source.
One source that I found that has proved to be both thorough and reliable was the book,
“Paradoxes of Individualization : Social Control and Social Conflict in Contemporary
Modernity”. Parts of this book actually go into a decent amount of depth concerning the mindset
that Keyboard Warriors have. This book also discusses them when considering the virtual
community as a whole. It even goes so far as to discuss the relations and tendencies between
people who meet online and then meet in person offline. This book uses various studies to help
investigate certain political stigmas found online. In particular, it was found that people
expressing conservative beliefs online, whether on social medias, forums, blogs, or in online
discussions, were commonly ostracized and faced social exclusion. Especially those holding far
rightwing to far rightwing extremist views, they tended to be ostracized online and offline,
being asked things like, “Why are you a dirty nazi?”, and being called, “brainless and stupid”.
However, this is being taken out of context. These rightwing extremists being talked about in
this book are, in fact, extreme. Found on the forum, Stormfront, they discuss topics concerning
racism, nazism, neonazism, to name a few, but did so in a praising manner. The book talks about
how the rightwing extremists are the ones giving modern conservatism a bad name. I found this
using DU’s online library catalog, and will be using this source.
Both of the above sources listed countless references over the entirety of the composition.
One source that I have found that I am still unsure of about using at this point is the book,
Democratizing Communication? by Bailie Winseck. This source does have a solid amount of
information pertaining to my topic, however some of the information may be outdated. The
book was published in 1997, which is just a year short of being twenty years, or two decades old.
Since the book was published, countless advances in technology have come and gone, the flip
phone was still relatively new at this day and age. Since 1997, even our culture has undergone
some pretty drastic changes, particularly concerning our reliance on mobile phones. Although
this source is older, it still maintains some relevant points.
One source that I found, and will not be using, was an article titled, “Trouble with
Tranny”. The reason I will not be using this source is that the center of focus in the article is
largely that of a leftist political bias, and is focused on transvestism in politics. The article lacks
in depth and specific information that connects their ideas to social medias. Overall, although
from a credible journal, Studies in Gender and Sexuality, this source does not quite fit the
purpose of my research.
Of the sources that I have found, a general trend seems to be that a majority of the
Keyboard Warriors are comprised of youths. Another trend seems to be that an overwhelming
majority of Keyboard Warriors are supporters of the far left ideologies in terms of politics. Even
when narrowing my search and searching a number of different keywords and using various
combinations, I was only able to find a small handful of sources that were mostly politically
neutral, and so far I have found zero publishings directly discussing conservative activism in
social medias. Any sources relating to conservative activism in social medias almost exclusively
represented the religious aspect of conservatism, which was usually attacked or attempted to be
debased. Additionally, these sources were much more heavily focused on religion than politics
in general. Some holes present in my secondary research are sources containing specific
statistics of Keyboard Warriors, as well as their effect on society. I could also use a couple of
sources that analyze the psychological aspect of Keyboard Warriors. These sources were found
using Google Scholar and the University of Denver, Anderson Academic Commons Library
Catalog.
I encountered similar results when scouring facebook for political activists. Thus far, I
have found a very limited number of alleged conservatives that actively defend their beliefs. I
have found a strong, but not an overwhelming, number of alleged liberals that perpetuate the
stereotypical Keyboard Warrior when defending their beliefs. I have been searching for
Keyboard Warriors by going on Facebook pages of friends that have either made their political
stance very clear, or was previously known to me, and then looking through their news feed to
find any politically sensitive posts or shares, and then checking the comments section to see if
anybody of the opposite ideology commented.
References:
Mali, P. (2015). Trolls, Trolling, & Cyber Law. CSI: Communications, 38(10), 3637. Retrieved November 1, 2015, from http://www.csinihilentegovernanceawards.org/csidocuments/EGovernanceBrochure201314.pdf#page=36
Houtman, D., & Aupers, S. (2011). Paradoxes of individualization social control and social conflict in contemporary modernity. Farnham: Ashgate.
Heklina, T. (2015). The Trouble With Tranny. Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 142143.
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15240657.2015.1038201#aHR0cDovL3d3dy50YW5kZm9ubGluZS5jb20vZG9pL3BkZi8xMC4xMDgwLzE1MjQwNjU3LjIwMTUuMTAzODIwMUBAQDA=
Bailie, M. (1997). Democratizing communication?: Comparative perspectives on information and power. Cresskill, N.J.: Hampton Press.
Blake Dickey
Writ 1133
Dr. Kara Taczak
October 30th, 2015
Keyboard Warriors: Do you even type bro?
Introduction: Why does it seem to be that the loudest voice in the room, is usually seen
as the right one? The answer is really quite simple actually, confidence. When somebody
expresses a high level of passion on a particular subject, accompanied by a steadfast confidence,
public opinion seems to favor their views over the opposition, especially in subjective matters.
Whether or not they have factual evidence to back them up, they will be favored. In today’s
society, the infamous Keyboard Warriors will often fill this niche. Keyboard Warriors are
today’s political voice of the people and leading force in ensuring social justice for all, or at
least, that’s how they view themselves. They are the ranters and ravers of the internet, looking
for any cause “worthy” enough to defend. Keyboard Warriors can be identified by their high
displays of confidence online, borderlining on arrogance. This can be seen in their comments
that are several paragraphs long on a status or post done by someone else. However, all of their
work is done from behind the “screens”, at a distance from their foes, in the safety and comfort
of their own homes. My question is: how real is their confidence? Specifically, how real is it
when in an offline setting? In this situation, I am defining “real” in terms of depth and
consistency. My goal is to find out if this confidence is real, through and through, or simply an
online facade. I’m curious to know the accuracy of the content of what they post, as well as if
they're as confrontational in person. I hypothesize that the difference in their confidence levels
will, in general, will vary greatly when observed online and offline. (Come back later and add
citations)
Methods: All research was conducted on the University of Denver campus. In order to
investigate this question, I utilized two main methods of research to help me draw my
conclusions. I will be using two 8 question surveys filled with general questions to find some
basic statistics surrounding Keyboard Warriors and how they correlate to online activism.
Examples of questions include; “What gender do you identify with? A.) Male B.) Female C.)
Other” and “Which of the following most closely describes your political affiliations? A.)
Liberal B.) Moderate C.) Conservative D.) Libertarian E.) Green Party F.) Other”. A link to each
survey was then posted online, each into 3 different facebook groups. A total of 40 responses
were collected, 15 from survey 1, and 25 from survey 2. Those who responded did so by choice.
In both surveys I used a few different methods in attempts to keep my surveys unbiased. First
off, I didn’t use negative adjectives to sway opinions. Secondly, I offered a variety of responses
for most questions to make them think about their answers by (hopefully) reading each answer.
Lastly, I tried to order the answers in a very linear way to avoid showing favoritism for a
particular answer. The second part of my primary research consisted of directly interviewing
some people that I personally know to be Keyboard Warriors, as well as the people who bait
them. I interviewed 4 people, 2 liberals and 2 conservatives. An example of a question I used
would be, “How knowledgeable would you consider yourself to be on current political matters,
such as economics, social justice, and environmental sustainability?”. Almost every single
question I asked had at least 2 purposes for being asked. The question above is looking to assess
confidence, as well as knowledgeability. This question is also a setup for the next question
which asks how knowledgeable they are compared to the general public and DU/College
Students. (add more)
Results & Data:
The Surveys
From the first survey, a total of 15 people responded, 7 males and 8 females. Of this
sample, 14 of them answered that Facebook is one of the two social medias that they use most,
and instagram came in second with 9 responses. One trend I found was that every test subject
has seen politically sensitive posts on facebooks, and most of them answered that they do quite
often, and 73% answered that they never comment on them. However, only 40% percent of
those surveyed said that they never post politically sensitive material on social medias, which
can be seen in table 1.1. Additionally, 60% of participants said that these posts do result in an
online political discussion at least sometimes, this can be seen in table 1.2.
Table 1.1: “How often do you post things of a political nature?”
Table1.2: “How often do these posts result in an online political discussion?”
Moreover, this survey almost rendered an even distribution of responses from liberals,
moderates, and conservatives. The last question I asked on this survey asked for three adjectives
to describe Keyboard Warriors, and this rendered zero responses that used positive adjectives.
Examples of responses included adjectives such as, opinionated, condescending, insane,
inconsiderate, liberal, and asinine to name a few.
From the second survey, a total of 25 people responded, 9 males and 16 females, and had
an average age of 20. It was found that Facebook is believed to carry the vast majority of online
social activism, however, tumblr received an honorable mention of 12% or 3 votes. In terms of
political affiliations, liberals and moderates account for 72% of responders, while conservatives
only account for 16% of responders. One question I asked was, “What are your beliefs
concerning ‘political correctness’?” (Table 2.1), and it can be seen that nobody indicated that
they believe it should be stricter. I asked this question in search of left extremists, because of the
current stereotype of Keyboard Warriors being left extremists. The results of the following
question can be seen in table 2.2, this question served the same purpose as the latter. In table 2.2,
it can be seen that 68% of respondents answered that people who choose not to be “PC”, should
simply be ignored. I chose this question in search of responses from those further on the
rightwing, giving them the third and fourth possible answers as bait. Tables 2.1 and 2.2 can be
seen at the top of the next page.
Table 2.1: “What are your beliefs concerning ‘political correctness’?”
Table 2.2: “What should be done about those who choose to not be ‘politically correct’?”
In this survey, it was found that 56% of respondents believe that people who identify as liberal
are the most reactive on social medias, as in that they are the Keyboard Warriors. Only 32%
answered conservatives, and the other 12% indicated an other option but no two answers were
the same.
The Interviews
The responses collected from the interview questions were by far the most insightful. Of
the people interviewed, 3 of them were male and 1 was female. Half of the people interviewed
claimed to be conservative and the other half claimed to be liberal in terms of political
affiliations. Everyone that I interviewed claimed to believe that they are generally more
knowledgeable and up to date than the general public in terms of politics in economics, social
justice, and environmental sustainability. Only one person interviewed claimed to be more
significantly more knowledgeable than other college students in general. All but one person
interviewed answered that they never post things online that they wouldn’t be comfortable with
saying to someone in person. One participant said, “Definitely. The internet is a safety net to
hide behind for most people, and I believe I take advantage of that often.”. Most participants
claimed to be mostly up to date with the news and have done their research. For most of the
questions, responses varied between each participant.
Discussion:
The responses that I obtained from the two surveys I conducted provided very little
insight concerning the actual behavior and confidence of Keyboard Warriors. The surveys were
helpful in finding the general public’s beliefs about them and how they’re viewed. The results of
the two surveys support that, in general, the belief is that the majority of Keyboard Warriors
posting politically sensitive things on Facebook, and other social media, are politically liberal.
The majority of participants responded that they politically affiliate as liberal, which augments
this finding. In most circumstances, opposing parties will point the finger at their rival.
Responses from the interviews helped to shed some light on the answer to my questions.
From what I have gathered based on the provided answers in the interviews, my sample
answered that they do not engage strangers that they disagree with in political discussion, online
and offline. All of them answered that the person they’re debating with has to be at least some
sort of acquaintance. This supports that for the most part, Keyboard Warriors’ confidence stays
consistent online and offline. Additionally, it supports that the Keyboard Warriors are generally
well informed, but every participant admitted that they have flaws in their prior knowledge of
many subjects they come across in this.
Interestingly enough, both of the participants that identified as conservative, exhibited
strong feelings concerning the perceived political ostracism of the right received from the left.
Several studies have been done that have found that rightwing politics, especially in the
extremes, are often time oppressed to the point of not sharing beliefs outside of specialized
forums. One study even found, “Many contributors of the forum indicate that their rightwing
extremist identities are met with strong condemnation by people in their social surroundings.
For several members, this even applies to their small family circle.”, and the paragraph went on
to say that these members are even asked “Why are you a dirty Nazi?”. This shows that this
activism in social media may be more from the general public of moderateliberals, and less so
from the real Keyboard Warriors.
However, I began my research with an inherent bias that I did not even realize I had up
until after I had finished my research. I began with the bias and assumption that everybody
viewed Keyboard Warriors to be as much of a nuisance as I do. However, when viewed in a
more favorable light, they are actually seen by some as people working to change the world for
the better, one bit at a time from the comfort of their own homes. One such view expressed was
“Facebook needs the support and trust of its users to survive. This is what gives users the power
to shape and inform the nature of the public spaces social media sites have become.” (Roux, pg.
41). She goes on to discuss that Facebook in this day and age serves as a platform for
expression. This goes to show that although some believe that the people perceived to be
Keyboard Warriors, may not even be ones at all. It has come to my attention that what I saw as
cowardice, may have actually just been a matter of opportunity. These people could simply just
be standing up for what they believe in and nothing more. People could be choosing to take
advantage of the anonymity and/or the computer screen as a shield, solely because they fear
physical altercation. According to Abraham Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, when the second tier,
security, is threatened, it makes it much more difficult for someone to focus on and speak freely
about abstract ideas (A. Maslow). In theory, this could help level the playing field, and open up
Facebook and other social medias for more intellectual discussions concerning politics and other
concentrations.
However, with this comes the need to differentiate types of Keyboard Warriors. Because
as is well known by everyone that has used the internet at least once in the past 5 years, not
everyone you meet online is nice. From my research I have found that there are three main
subtypes of Warriors, with the main difference in each type being the level of aggression that
they exhibit online. The most aggressive subtype of Keyboard Warriors are “trolls”. Mentioned
in the article was one study, done by the canadian school University of Manitoba, found that,
“...trolls exhibit the personality traits of narcissists, psychopaths and sadists – taking pleasure in
the suffering of others and lacking remorse or empathy for their victims.” (Mali. P, pgs. 3637).
In other words, for trolls, the discussion is not about winning or losing, but more so about just
pissing off the other person as much as they can. They tend to utilize personal attacks over cold
hard evidence. They also differ in that they tend to have a heavier presence on social medias
such as youtube and reddit, and other places they can be truly anonymous without having to
worry about immediate repercussions. Trolling is considered to be a form of cyberbullying.
Next, there is the passionate political Keyboard Warrior, this type has been generally shown to
be comprised of youths. Youths are considered to be anyone still cognitively developing that is
part of the Millennial generation, or generation Y. The Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences
defines them as, “Youth are said to be 46 percent of the total global population and can be
defined as a person who is still in their formative years, undergoing character modelling,
personality development and sometimes receiving training that has to do with human capital
development. Youth is an important human capital development in the process of national
building due to the great potential they have (Kayode 2011).” (Salman, pg. 1). This is during a
point in life that their personal identities have not become completely concrete yet, and
defending their beliefs helps them to make them gradually more concrete internally. Along with
their high familiarity with social medias, this makes them much more likely candidates to
become passionate when defending beliefs online. In part due to their immaturity, when
situations arise that puts them in the position of being wrong, it is common to resort to minor
personal attacks on the opposition. That isn’t to say that it is only the youth that are getting
passionate about political matters. Of course there are perfectly welladjusted adults who may
get overly passionate while discussing certain topics online, but that can be largely attributed to
situational and personality causes. The last type of Keyboard Warrior is the aforementioned
more passive one that simply appreciates online political discussions for the intellectual
stimulation, along with getting the chance to express their views to their peers.
Limitations & Conclusion This particular topic presented many limitations in both carrying out and analyzing
research. The biggest limitation of this research were the time constraints, as well as being
forced to divide my attention among my other classes during the main researching period. Due
to the nature of this topic being highly analytical, and so little information that can be obtained
that is both useful and reliable, it made this topic difficult to investigate. There were three main
tasks I wanted to complete. The first one being to analyze the accuracy of the information in
their rants posted on social medias. This proved to be difficult in that it was nearly impossible to
obtain a purely random sample that was chosen without bias. The only way of analyzing this,
that I was able to do within the given time constraints, was to include a couple of questions in the
interview portion of my research and an open ended response question in the first survey in
attempts to assess this.
Secondly, I wanted to figure out whether the confidence displayed online carries over
into real life arguments. Even in an actual experiment, this would be very difficult to produce
any sort of reliable results due to the lack of random assortment. Additionally, cultural norms
would have played a huge difference. For instance, it is very common in midwestern and
scandinavian cultures to adopt an outwardly passive stance when in public. This is done in order
to avoid conflict. Oppositely, however, in northeastern and in southeastern cultures it is much
more common to speak out in public, in general, they don’t mind taking part in or viewing a little
bit of conflict.
One other possible limitation can be found within the surveys. The order in which survey
questions are asked can have a huge impact on the answers that participants give. In social
psychology, priming is a term that refers to when a subject is exposed to a stimulus, and the
exposure to that stimulus affects their response to the second stimulus. This applies in that
seeing a certain question first instead of another could have an effect on their response to the
next survey question. It is a very tough call when trying to decide on the order of questions that
would present the least amount of bias relative to the topic. In terms of the question I asked
pertaining to the participants’ political affiliations, it should have either been asked first or last.
If it had been asked first, this would have helped make sure that none of the other demographic
based questions biased their answer, because people make general associations that can affect
their behavior when brought to their attention. These associations can be a variety of things,
even as simple as race, gender, or sexuality. If the question had been asked last, it would have
helped to prevent them being primed with a label of any certain political affiliation, which would
help to prevent them from answering the other questions based on how they believe people of the
same affiliation are supposed to answer.
In conclusion, although some of the research I conducted, both secondary and primary,
did show some mild correlation to my subject, I really lacked the time and resources necessary to
obtain reliable data on this topic. The surveys were much more apt at filling in the gaps of
knowledge concerning how Keyboard Warriors are perceived by the public, as well as other
small helpful details. The results obtained from the interviews would have been more reliable if
the sample size had been greater. To obtain better results, an experiment able to compare the
confidence levels of a known Keyboard Warrior online versus offline (in public) without them
knowing they are being tempted to respond, as well as somehow being able to maintain a random
sample with a large enough sample size, would all be necessary.
References
Roux, K. (2015). Hit them where it hurts tackling Facebook's misogyny problem. Rhodes Journalism Review, (35), 4042.
Retrieved November 1, 2015, from http://reference.sabinet.co.za/sa_epublication_article/rujr_n35_a13
Maslow, A. (2007, September 17). Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs. Retrieved November 23, 2015, from
http://www.simplypsychology.org/maslow.html
Mali, P. (2015). Trolls, Trolling, & Cyber Law. CSI: Communications, 38(10), 3637. Retrieved November 1, 2015, from
http://www.csinihilentegovernanceawards.org/csidocuments/EGovernanceBrochure201314.pdf#page=36
Salman, A., & Saad, S. (2015). Online Political Participation: A Study of Youth Usage of New Media. MJSS
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences.
Houtman, D., & de, K. W. (2011). Paradoxes of Individualization : Social Control and Social Conflict in Contemporary
Modernity. Farnham, Surrey, GBR: Ashgate Publishing Group. Retrieved from
http://0www.ebrary.com.bianca.penlib.du.edu
Appendix
Interview Questions:
1. What sort of relationship do you believe exists between politics and social media in our
modern society? What role, if any, do you believe you play in this relationship? What
sort of relationship do you think should exist?
2. How knowledgeable would you consider yourself to be on current political matters, such
as economics, social justice, and environmental sustainability?
3. In general, without singling out a specific demographic, how knowledgeable do you
believe the public, or college students in general, to be on these matters, compared to
yourself?
4. Has online activism become an essential part of modern politics, any specific reasons?
5. Generally, when you see a post containing politically sensitive material on a social
media, how do you respond in terms of your argument? (by doing research first, respond
right away, personal attacks, wait until someone else responds, social pressures/guilt etc.)
6. Do you ever post or comments things online that you wouldn't be as comfortable saying
to someone in person? If so, why?
7. Is there a political affiliation, or demographic, that is more politically active on social
medias than others? If so, why?
8. Do you believe that people (observers or participators) change their beliefs as a result of
online activism?
9. Do you find yourself in political discussions (heated or not) more often in person, or
online?
10. Would you be more likely to get into a heated discussion with someone you know or
don’t know while online?
By signing, you are granting consent for this information to be used as part of a research exercise
that I am completing for a course at the University of Denver. Your participation is completely
voluntary. The information you provide may be used in a class project and/or published in
research writing that I am doing, but your identity will only be known by me and my professor.
Although profile information may be included in my project, your name and the name of the
organization will NOT be used. You may further agree or disagree whether to be recorded via
audio/video for research purposes.
_____ I agree to be recorded via audio with the understanding that the recording will be
destroyed after the research is completed.
_____ I agree to be recorded via video with the understanding that the recording will be
destroyed after the research is completed.
_____ I do not want to be recorded via audio or video.
_____________________________________ (signature)
_____________________________________ (phone / email)
______________ (date)
Link to Survey #2
https://qtrial2015q4az1.az1.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_6XPRj3KekGlZOHb
Note: I was unable to keep both links to my surveys open for viewing at the same time.
Additionally, I was unable to copy and paste or take a screenshot of the screen, or email a copy
of it, due to Qualtrics not allowing me to.
Just Newspaper Things
Overview & Conducting Primary Research
Over the course of the past few weeks, I have been researching and investigating some of
the ambiguity surrounding Keyboard Warriors. Keyboard Warriors are activists, usually social
or political, that utilize social medias as a medium to communicate their strongly held beliefs.
This way they are able to speak freely from the safety of their own homes, behind a computer
screen. They are mainly known for using assertive language, social pressures, and
overconfidence to achieve their goals. The purpose of conducting my primary research was to
answer my specific question concerning the depth of the confidence of Keyboard Warriors using
scientific methods. This way the data that I gathered can be analyzed from both a quantitative
and a qualitative perspective. This avoids any conclusions being drawn from sheerly anecdotal
sources, and eliminating the biases of illusory correlation and the confirmation bias. Meaning,
observations made are fair and deliberate, not based off of observations that are made only when
specific conditions arise that fit what the observer is looking for. The purpose of composing our
findings in a new genre is to help decide on the manner to best
communicate the findings from our research.
Target Audience
A larger demographic will be targeted, it will include an increased
age range. Americans aged 1935 years old, college graduates
specifically. This is still a relatively young demographic, excluding
the middle aged and older. This demographic makes sense because they are young enough to be
more familiar with, and even regularly use, multiple social medias, but are old enough for there
to be a possibility of them being “out of the loop”. Having a college education will help them to
better understand the issues discussed by Keyboard Warriors, as well as making my topic more
relatable to them because, chances are, they have met someone who fits the description of a
keyboard warrior. Additionally, it is still common for people within this age range to read
magazines and news articles.
Projected Genre
I will be utilizing the stylistic aspects of a newspaper/magazine article for this
composition. The reasoning for this is in part due to the general tendencies of the selected
demographic. It is not uncommon for people of this age range, especially for the upper quartile,
to read magazines, to maybe even have a few subscriptions. Magazine articles are typically
written in a more informal style than Journal articles. There are less constants in magazine
articles than there are journal articles. Journal articles are composed of multiples sections with
broader headings, typically including an abstract, methods, data/results, discussion, and a
references section.
Design Plan
This plan is perfect for my topic in that it utilizes a type of media that is capable of
reaching everyone in my target audience, and is a topic relevant enough to them for them to read
it. First off, I would decide on the magazine/newsletter website that would with the highest
following from my target demographic, this would likely be a magazine along the lines of the
Economist or Reader’s Digest. Both of these magazines have largely intellectual follower base,
often times containing articles pertaining to current events in politics, as well as news from social
medias and the internet. Additionally, getting the article published in one of these magazines
would help to give it some credibility in the eyes of readers.
References
Bailie, M. (1997). Democratizing communication?: Comparative perspectives on
information and power. Cresskill, N.J.: Hampton Press.
Heklina, T. (2015). The Trouble With Tranny. Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 142143.
Houtman, D., & Aupers, S. (2011). Paradoxes of individualization social control and
social conflict in contemporary modernity. Farnham: Ashgate.
Roux, K. (2015). Hit them where it hurts tackling Facebook's misogyny problem.
Rhodes Journalism Review, (35), 4042. Retrieved November 1, 2015, from
http://reference.sabinet.co.za/sa_epublication_article/rujr_n35_a13
Salman, A., & Saad, S. (2015). Online Political Participation: A Study of Youth Usage of
New Media. MJSS Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences.
Blake Dickey
Writ 1133
Dr. Kara Taczak
November 16th, 2015
My Theory of Writing
My Theory of Writing begins always with a purpose or reason to write. Every writer has
some sort of goal in mind when creating a new composition. Usually, an idea or message may
have the need to be communicated. It does not matter where the need comes from, or how
powerful it is, it only matters that it is there. There are two types of need in this situation,
internal and external. Internal need is the writer’s own want to write, whether for fun, to release
internal tensions or stress, or to simply record observations. An example of this would be a
diary, because it is about the writer’s personal motivation to write down their thoughts and
feelings. External need is when a service is needed to be supplied, an example of this could be a
lawyer writing a deposition for an upcoming court case. The writer may not always be
cognitively aware of their exact motivator, they may even be writing just to escape boredom.
Over the past quarter, I have realized that writing is a fluid entity in nature, it can take
form the form of almost any shape. Prior to this class I didn’t see writing as its own entity, I saw
it as a tool or medium of expression. I saw it as a logic diagram, like a reverse tree diagram, with
the topic at the top, and several different options stemming down from it. In a fluid/liquid,
components mix together and form a homogenized solution (I’m excluding mixtures like oil and
water from this rule), although it appears to be uniform, every component plays a part in its
makeup. My high school teachers were the ones who helped me establish the few main axioms I
have in my theory of writing. I had a few teachers in high school that could be considered
‘freespirited’ or ‘young at heart’, who helped me to realize the versatility of writing. A few of
these teachers taught english, but there were some from almost every subject. The only
exception being math, for obvious reasons. These teachers ingrained it in my brain that writing
is a versatile skill that can be used in a multitude of situations, and in an even greater multitude
of ways. The main way my prior has impacted my writing is by giving me the bias that every
shape and form of writing requires a purpose or goal that needs to be completed (Dickey, Maps
3)
Once there is a purpose, rhetoric is then used to decide how the message/idea should be
communicated in order to accomplish the writer’s goals. It is absolutely necessary to keep the
three key elements of rhetoric in mind when writing, especially when attempting to write
something persuasive. These three elements are audience, genre, and voice.
When targeting an audience, it is important to predict how they will react to the topic, the
message, and the format of the composition in order to attain the desired response. Deciding the
genre gives the composition a loose format and basic guidelines to follow, it helps to target a
more specific demographic of interested people. Finally, the portion I believe to be the most
important aspect to keep in mind is voice. The voice of any composition can make or break the
entire thing. It is made up of word choice, sentence structure, as well as tone. While a certain
genre may initially attract an audience, the voice keeps them reading.
All three components of rhetoric work together, in unison. Genre helps to determine the
audience, knowledge of the audience helps to determine the optimal voice, and the voice can
influence how the genre is perceived by the audience. However, depending on the rhetorical
situation, the relationship of these terms to each other can change. To me, writing in itself really
is more of a method of persuasion.
Even before taking this course, I had a decent conscious understanding of the working
relationship between genre, audience, and voice. Genre was usually determined for me, so in the
past it was something that was just hanging out on my periphery. It was there merely to help me
for formatting and stylistic purposes. I mainly used audience to decide who I wanted to react and
how, and used this to help determine my voice. The voice can also be determined by the context
of the situation. Context is another important aspect of writing. It sets you up, lets you know
where you are and what’s going on in a composition. Bitzer once said, “...context is a general
condition of human communication,”, emphasizing its importance even in everyday life. Having
some sort of context is the basis of every form of communication, from texting to sign language
to speaking. This is the reason why people generally don’t walk up to two strangers having a
conversation and just jump in without even having eavesdropped first. It’s because we don’t
have context!
Often times, the prior of a writer is not sufficient to serve as the writer’s lone knowledge
base. Prior knowledge does serve as a good basis of where to begin research, or to conduct any
research at all based on the strengths and shortcomings in the writer’s prior. Once the limitations
of prior knowledge have been established, if needed, secondary research can begin. Secondary
research is searching through old sources of established facts, experiments, and records, to
acquire new information. If there is still a knowledge gap that needs to be filled after conducting
secondary research, it is pertinent to conduct primary research. Primary research is the search
for new, raw data, and consists of conducting experiments, surveys, and interviews.
With persuasion, comes a purpose for it. I believe it can be divided into three main
categories of intent, malevolent, benevolent, and indifferent. To clarify, malevolent intent would
be someone writing in the offensive, actively trying to build their arguments while at the same
time breaking down their opponents arguments, overall trying to gain benefit themselves
(internal or external). Benevolent intent is writing for the purpose of benefitting others, such as
writing a thoughtful message in a friend’s birthday card. Generally benevolent and malevolent
intents discuss matters of a subjective matter. Indifferent intent is generally used for verifying
facts, among other objective subjects of thought.
Overall, what it comes down to is that writing is whatever the writer wants it to be. As a
writer, I want this portfolio to be done. All jokes aside, writing is bound by few guidelines, and
as cheesy as it sounds, a piece of paper is just like a blank canvas, it’s just waiting for the
imagination of the author/painter to make it something.
Self Review of Draft:
1. The overall purpose of my theory of writing is to provide a general description of how writing
works and what it is.
2. See yellow highlighted portion above.
3. I hope that the audience will see that writing is only as limited as you choose to make it.
4. See green highlighted portion above, those are quotes from my Maps Take 3. I need to add
more from other writing.
5. I need to add quotes from theorists
6. The maps connect to my alphabetic theory of writing in that the metaphors I used for Maps
Take 2 and Take 3 are both examples of how the terms can work together without having any
specific order. By creating both visual and alphabetic representations of my theory I was able to
reach a deeper understanding of my own theory than I would have from just one.
7. My prior impacted my theory of writing in that I began this class with a few inherent biases
about writing.
8. In other classes and situations, my theory of writing will be very useful in creating outlines
and plans for almost any composition. I need to add other contexts that my theory would be
useful in.
9. Because, over time, I will gain a deeper understanding of it as I use it across a multitude of
situations and will be able to change it when new information presents itself.
10. I learned that I, as a writer, still have much more to learn about writing. Writing is a much
broader and deeper subject of discussion than it appears to be at the surface.
Recommended