ECONOMIC PROJECT

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

ECONOMIC PROJECT. Protectionism Measures. Voluntary export restraint Deliberate excessive custom procedures Trade embargo. MUTUAL BENEFITS. FORUM FOR NEGOTIATION. Canada and WTO. European Union on Canada. Voluntary Export Restraint. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

ECONOMIC PROJECT

Protectionism MeasuresVoluntary export restraint

Deliberate excessive custom procedures

Trade embargo

MUTUAL BENEFITS

FORUM FOR NEGOTIATION

Canada and WTO

European Union on Canada

Voluntary Export Restraint

A government imposed limit on the quantity of goods that can be exported out of a country during a specified period of time.

For a VER to be effective, the two countries involved need to be major trade partners of each other hence the large country analysis.

In a large country context, where the actions of one partner affects the world price and hence the TOT for the other, quotas lead to different welfare outcomes from VERs.

In terms of price effect of VER, we take USA is an example of an exporting country. In the US market, there is excess supply.

This leads to a reduction in price. Lower price will reduce US supply and raise US demand. Hence, reducing in US export supply.

For the welfare effect of VER, PFT is the free trade equilibrium price. Importing country price will rise. Since the demand equals to quota level, exporting country price will fall. Export supply equals to quota level. As shown by the graph on the left, the welfare effect of the importing country includes: Consumer Surplus= - (A + B +C+D) Producer Surplus= +AQuota Rents= 0National Welfare= - (B +C+D)

On the right, the graph illustrates the exporting country welfare effect:Consumer Surplus= +eProducer Surplus= - (e + f + g + h)Quota Rents= +(c + g)National Welfare= c - (f + h)World Welfare= - (B +D) - (f + h)

An example of such a voluntary export restraint agreement was the 1981 VER deal between U.S. and Japan.

The Japanese car makers "voluntarily" reduced their shipment of cars to the U.S. The agreement was designed help protect and resurrect the car industry of the U.S.

Deliberate Extensive Custom

Procedures Extensive procedures are implemented

The objective is to protect a country from the pitfalls of recession.

To protect knowledge workers

Eg. America

LUMP OF LABOUR FALLACY

Eg. Opposition to immigration and migrant workers.

Displace existing workers Stimulate economic growth Increased demand Increased employment Dislocation in local labour market Drive down wages Reduces purchasing power Better union organisation & legal

protection against exploitation (NOT our objective) Unfair. Locals face increased job

competition.

PROTECTIONISM = HOSTILITY TO IMMIGRATION

Aims to stop labour from moving across the world.

Adam Smith. Not to argue against developing economies protecting fledgling industries, or to say that our current free trade system is fair, or even very free.

How to deal?

Increase demand, not pitch workers of one country against those of another in a competitive protectionism

As recession does not counter it.

Trade EmbargoA political move by one country against

another A strategy to make another country either

do something or refrain from doing something

The country imposing the trade embargo will prohibit most or all people in their country from doing business with the country against which the trade embargo is imposed.

It may even mean that citizens from the imposing country are banned from visiting the prohibited country.

One of the most famous trade embargoes in recent times is the trade embargo the United States holds with Cuba.

The embargo was established in the hope that prohibiting trade with Cuba would weaken the country’s economy to the point where Cuba would overthrow Fidel Castro and implement a democratic government.

Under the terms of the Cuban Democracy Act, the

United States does not transact business with Cuba, and does not allow Cuban investors to spend money in the US.

Arguments Against the Embargo

It actually helps keep Castro in power

What's good for China is good for Cuba

It mostly hurts the people it's supposed to help

Arguments for the Embargo

Lifting the embargo will strengthen Castro's government

Cuba's trade with other Western countries hasn't eased repression

Easing the embargo before Castro agrees to change sends the wrong signal

By:Wei Yang Ze HaoFarah AmiraLing XinNur Asyura

Recommended