View
2
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
ECSEL JU Moving Forward in 2016
Bert De Colvenaer Executive Director Torino, 22 March 2016
1
Electronic Components and Systems for European Leadership
a Public-Private Partnership
Keeping Europe at the Forefront of Technology Development
Established by the Council Regulation (EU) No 561/2014
2
Implement Horizon 2020: • Develop favourable conditions for investing in
knowledge and innovation • Achieve smart, sustainable and inclusive growth
PPP-model with 3-way funding • The European Union (1.17B€, via EC/H2020) • The ECSEL Participating States (>1.17B€) • The Private Members (~ 5B€ minus grants) • Build upon ARTEMIS/ENIAC JU experience and achievements
3
4
Executive Director Public Authorities Board Private Members Board OFFICE
Governing Board ECSEL Members
(Public Authorities, Private Members)
• Strategic orientation, supervises implementation Approves MultiAnnual Strategic Plan (MASP), Work Plan (WP), rules, membership, budget, staff, communication policy
Executive Director Programme Office
• Chief Executive, legal representation Consolidates Multi Annual Strategic Plan and Financial Perspectives, elaborates budget proposal, Work Plan, executes calls; monitors projects
Public Authorities Board European Commission,
ECSEL Participating States
• Representatives of the Public Authorities Approves call launching, call rules, allocates funding
Private Members Board AENEAS, ARTEMIS-IA, EPoSS
• Defines research agenda Elaborates the multiannual strategic research and innovation agenda (MASRIA) and the annual research and innovation activities plan (RIAP)
Union Body, Legal Personality, 4 Bodies:
5
Strategy for ECS: Without a state of the art technological
infrastructure, Europe will be dependent on importation
Without functionality provided by the embedded software, the chips are useless and the fabs are economically unsustainable
Without integrating components in smart systems, it is impossible to capture the economic benefits on the end user markets
6
► ENIAC + ARTEMIS + EPoSS = ECSEL
• Multi Annual Strategic Plan (MASP) • Work Plan (WP)
MASRIA +
RIAP
MASP
WP
Produced by the ECSEL Industry Associations ECSEL JU Office
7
Adopted by ECSEL JU Governing Board
8
... Because ELECTRONICS matters to everyone!
9
The ECSEL Strategy
Impossibile visualizzare l'immagine.
10
Page : 11
Impossibile visualizzare l'immagine.
Impossibile visualizzare l'immagine.
Impossibile visualizzare l'immagine.
Impossibile visualizzare l'immagine.
Impossibile visualizzare l'immagine.
End User Applications systems
Connectivity
Unit-level integration IC assembly and
test
WAFERS Wafer manufacturing - Processes - Materials - ...
Characterisation Qualification
MM MtM
M/NEMS Devices Libraries
...
IC design
HW Architectures
PCB design Middleware
Sensors/Actuators
System design System
modelling
Certification V&V
Packaging
Non-functional characteristics
TOOLS !
Interconnect
Impossibile visualizzare l'immagine.
Operating Systems
Security
Wireless
SOFTWARE CHIPS
12
Participation
119 proj, 4 B€ costs, 650 M€ EU, 875 M€ MS, >1K participants, 40% SMEs
Impossibile visualizzare l'immagine.
ARTEMIS/ENIAC • Only one funding rate: 15% (ENIAC),
16,7% (Artemis) regardless the type of actions or beneficiary
• JU funding supplementing National
funding
• JU funding payment dependent from NGAs signature
• Cost recognition follows national rules and national eligibility criteria (e.g. in Italy dissemination, management and travel costs are not eligible costs)
ECSEL • JU funding rates = % of H2020, tailored
to beneficiary types (LE, SME, Unif) and type of Action (IA, RIA)
• JU funding supplementing National funding
• JU funding payment pace independent
from NGAs signature
• Cost recognition follows H2020 rules and cost categories (Italian funding authority applies H2020 cost categories) 13
• ECSEL JU average success rate*: 23% (16,7% RIA, 44,2% IA)
• FP7 ARTEMIS average success rate: 26% • FP7 ENIAC average success rate: 46% * 2014-15 calls
ECSEL call 2014 • Submitted: 34 RIA, 14 IA • Retained for grant: 6 RIA, 6 IA • RIA success rate: 17,6% • IA success rate: 42,9%
ECSEL call 2015 • Submitted: 51 RIA, 11 IA • Retained for grant: 8 RIA, 5 IA • RIA success rate: 15,7% • IA success rate: 45,5%
14
15
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
call 2008 call 2009 call 2010 call 2011 call 2012 call 2013 call 2014 call 2015 call 2016Estimate
8 10
8 5
7,5
2
10
12
10
7
7,5
1 2,9
0,6
18,5
10,5
13,3
13,4
5,4
6,6
3 4,9
3,5
18,5
ARTEMIS Italian funding (Meuro) ENIAC Italian funding (M€) ECSEL Italian funding (M€)
ENIAC+ARTEMIS EU funding (M€) ECSEL EU funding (M€)
16
• 2 calls x 2 phase, in parallel • ECSEL 2016-1 (RIA) Industrial/Applied Research project TRL 3-4 • ECSEL 2016-2 (IA) Experimental development projects TRL 5-8 • “Lighthouse Initiatives” as a separate, parallel action
• Call Published: March 15th 2016 • PO deadline : May 24th 2016 • FPP deadline : September 20th 2016 • Funding decision :
Target End November 2016
17
EVALUATIONS
jan feb mar apr may jun jul aug sep oct nov dec
PO Deadline May 24
FPP Deadline
September 20
Call open March 15
ECSEL Call Forum
Brussels
ECSEL Events Date / Place
ECSEL Brokerage event 27-28/01 Strasbourg
ECSEL Call Forum 3 May, Brussels
ECSEL Stakeholders’ Forum Late October, Brussels
18
ECSEL Brokerage Strasbourg
Funding decision
ECSEL Stakeholders’
Forum
19
RIA IA
EU/ECSEL 65 M€ 85 M€
IT 18.5 M€
All MS About 160 M€
20
Type RIA IA
For profit (non SME) 25% 20% SME 30% 25%
University/Other 35% 35% EU Contribution as % of the eligible cost according to H2020 (beneficiaries may ask for a lower contribution)National contributions: see Annex of the Work Plan
21
ECSEL JU “Lighthouse Initiatives” • Build on well identified market-pull related
to societal needs, with a strong pan-European dimension
• Create ecosystems along the relevant value and supply chains, where appropriate: – Working towards clustering of projects – Having a strategic IP management policy – Establishing a standardization strategy – Addressing the relevant non-technical aspects
(legislative, regulatory, social, ...)
• Similar to the “ECSEL Consortium Building Event” – Brussels Sheraton Airport Hotel – Date: 3 May 2016
– Agenda:
• Update Call info, submission, ... • Facilitate proposal consolidation
and partner engagement
• Focus on Networking - Breakout & Poster Session
22
H2020 Participant Portal: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/home.html Online manual for H2020: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/docs/h2020-funding-guide/index_en.htm User guide for the submission tool: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/support/sep_usermanual.pdf Annotated JU GA: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/amga/h2020-amga_en.pdf For questions on any aspect of grant applications and the EU Research Framework Programmes, including beneficiary registration and data updates, please refer to the : http://ec.europa.eu/research/index.cfm?pg=enquiries For any IT-related problems that you might experience with the Submission system, please contact the : http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/api/contact/index.html Our website (specific webpage with links to documents and actualized information): http://www.ecsel.eu/ Questions specific to ECSEL:calls@ecsel.europa.eu 23
• Register your company (PIC number) • Use the portal to register your proposal
(coordinator) Proposal consists of: • Part A: consortium information including
financial information (cost, funding) • Part B: Pdf with technical description • Part C: Country specific information required
(specific for ECSEL) 24
25
25% of DC
Direct cost: Personnel
Direct cost: Subcontracting
Other direct cost Equipment, Travel Materials, etc
Indirect cost
JU Funding
x% of DC Budget according
to H2020 rules
Budget according to national rules
National Funding
• If activities with costs are funded through ESI funds, then those activities cannot obtain ECSEL JU funding.
• Various possibilities to include activities funded by ESI funds described in Guide for Applicants
• Main issue: no overlap • Risk mitigation: what happens if the activity does
not get the ESI funding? • ECSEL JU team is available to advice
26
27
Submission of Full Project Proposal
Evaluation by experts
Score of proposals (under/above threshold)
Selection in PAB, funding, synergy with EU and national policies
Admissibility and JU eligibility check
Final ranking
Communication to coordinator
Handling of change requests
PAB decision on change requests
Signature of JU GA
GAP Selection of projects
3 months 4-5 months
28
Thank you for your attention!
Recommended