View
7
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
EDUCATIONAL POLICY ON HELLENIC PRIMARY
EDUCATION AFTER THE 1974 POLITICAL CHANGE TO
DEMOCRACY
By
DIMITRIOS GOTZOS
A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of M.A in
Education
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
LANCASTER UNIVERSITY
SEPTEMBER 1996
1
This work is original and has not been submitted previously in support of any
degree,qualifiaction or course
2
ABSTRACT
The theoretical framework of this study is connected with the explanation and interpretation of the
educational policy making process. This interpretation is done through an approach at two levels. At
the first level of the approach, contemporary theories of educational policy are critically discussed. The
second complementary level of our approach focuses on the intervening role of various social interests
in the educational policy making process. There follows an identification of the social, political and
historical context of the study, the methodology, the aims of the study and the research questions.
The second part of the study includes a detailed evaluation of these policies in relation to the
opportunity to learn, content and performance standards followed by a general presentation of the
reforms and policies on Hellenic primary education in the period under examination. In the
conclusions we attempt an overall view of the implemented policies as well as an explanation of the
policy making and implementation processes in the context of our study. As a whole, this study aspires
to contribute to the understanding of the educational policy making processes and to propose a way of
critical review of educational policy in Greece focusing on the area of primary education.
3
CONTENTS
Abbreviations
DOE Primary school teacher Federation of Greece.
ESYE National Statistical Service of Greece
EU European Union
KEME Centre for Educational Studies and In-service training
KKE Communist Party of Greece
MNERA Ministry of National Education and Religious Affairs
ND New Democracy
PASOK Panhellenic Socialsist Movement
PEK Regional In-service training Centres
Tables
1.Level of education of primary school teachers. page 29
2.Allocation of school population of primary education in each grade.
School years 1975/76-1980/81. 34
3. Illiterates and semi illiterates in counts and percentages in districts. 35
4. State primary schools in urban, semi urban and rural areas. 38
5.(a)Share of the total expenditure on primary education in relation to the total educational
expenditure.(b) Share of educational expenditure on the state budget. 41
4
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS page V
INTRODUCTION VI
PART I
EDUCATIONAL POLICY MAKING 1
1.Contemporary theoretical approaches to educational policy 1
Liberal approaches 1
Marxist approaches 3
Welfare state approaches 5
Pluralist approaches 6
2. An interpretation of educational policy 9
3.Subject of study method and research questions 15
PART II
STANDARDS OF PRIMARY EDUCATION IN GREECE AND THE EDUCATIONAL
POLICY SINCE 1974 20
1. The opportunity to learn standards. -Equality of educational opportunities 20
2. The content standards 25
Initial and in-service training of primary school teachers 27
Educational research 31
3. The performance standards 33
Compulsory education and student dropout 33
Literacy 35
The primary schools 37
Educational expenditure 40
4. Reforms and policies on primary education 43
CONCLUSIONS 53
NOTES 56
APPENDIX 57
REFERENCES 59
5
Acknowledgements
This dissertation owes much to the assistance of Professor Oliver Futlon under whose supervision all
of the work was done. I very much appreciate his critical evaluation of my drafts, his useful advice and
his encouragement. I am also grateful to the staff of Lancaster University Library as well as to the staff
of the Library of the Faculty of Education and the Educational Library of the Faculty of Philosophy of
the National and Capodistrian University of Athens for their help in my research.
6
INTRODUCTION
In this study it is attempted to analyse and interpret the educational policies that were implemented
in Greece after the 1974 political change to democracy concentrating on the years from 1974 till 1989.
The focusing point is the area of primary education, as this is the area of my personal interest. The
interest of this study is in the interpretation of the policy making and implementation processes. At the
same time, a critical analysis of the implemented policies is attempted in relation to the educational
standards. Our interpreting framework is the outcome of an abstracted understanding of the
relationship between education, state and society that is attempted through the critical and dialectic
presentation of contemporary theoretical approaches to educational policy combined with an
examination of the interest intervention processes.
Methodologically, this study reviews the implemented policies in relation to the concept of
educational standards and in particular of the opportunity to learn, content and performance standards
of education. Educational standards are discussed in relation to the way that they are understood by
theory, by educational research, by the state policies and by the interest groups involved in educational
policy focusing on the role of the political parties and the Primary school teacher Federation of
Greece(DOE).
In the first chapter of the first part some of the most important approaches to educational policy,
such as the liberal, marxist, pluralist and the welfare state approaches, will be presented, as these were
found as the most important ones, but this does not mean that there are no other theoretical
approaches. However, the extent of this study does not allow a more detailed presentation of
theoretical approaches. It will be attempted to identify the points of consent as well as the points of
contention among these approaches.
Apart from the underpinning political ideologies there are also other factors which determine the
educational policy making of the state that will be searched in the second chapter of the first part.
These factors have mainly to do with the various economic and political interests that intervene in the
policy making and affect its evaluation of educational standards as well as the decisions that are taken
for the monitoring of these standards. It is hoped that these two chapters will give a thorough account
of the way in which the educational policy is developed.
7
The third chapter of the first part will define the specific historical, political and social context of my
research. It will identify the particular issues of Hellenic primary education that will be analysed as
well as the way that this analysis will be structured. This chapter aspires to link the preceding
discussion about educational policy development with the specific problems and policies on Hellenic
primary education in the years 1974-89 that will be analysed in the second part of the study.
In the first chapter of the second part the state educational policies as well as the attitudes of the
political parties and educational interest groups will be examined in relation to the so called
educational standards. Husen's and Tuijnman's(1994) classification of educational standards was
adopted for this examination. Thus, educational standards are classified as follows:
-The performance standards: educational policies on issues that are indicative of the performance of an
education system will be discussed. In particular, we will focus on policies on compulsory schooling,
illiteracy, material and technical resources and financing of primary education. The uniformity of the
standards, i.e whether the educational policies resulted in the establishment of the same educational
standards nation-wide, i.e in urban as well as in rural areas will be also discussed.
-The content standards: in this section the educational policies will be discussed in relation to the
primary curriculum, the textbooks as well as in relation to issues that indirectly affect the quality of the
content of the education provided by primary schools, such as educational research as well as primary
school teacher education.
-The opportunity to learn standards: The implemented educational policies will be analysed in relation
to the equality of opportunities issue. In particular, it will be discussed whether these policies
attempted to counterbalance the existing social inequalities as well as whether they supported the
public character of primary education.
The major reforms and policies on primary education that took place during the period covered by
this study will be presented in the final chapter of the study and they will be examined in respect to the
previously discussed forms of educational standards.
Finally, at the conclusions, the effectiveness of the implemented educational policies regarding the
issues discussed in the second part of the study will be assessed with reference to the processes of the
formulation of these policies.
8
PART I
EDUCATIONAL POLICY MAKING
1.Contemporary theoretical approaches to educational policy
Liberal approaches
Liberal theoretical approaches to educational policy prioritise the issue of individual freedom, which
they see as the most important condition that should be fulfilled by every educational policy. A matter
which is criticized by liberal educational policy is that of equality of opportunity for education.
Johnson(1990) refers to Warnock(1975) who argues that the concept of equality in its pure form
cannot be acceptable because this implies a uniformity between individuals. In particular,
Warnock(ibid) suggests that the idea that 'everyone has an equal right to education' leads to the
suggestion that 'everyone has a right to equal education' something that implies that 'everyone has the
right to the same education'[cited by Johnson(1990,p.6)]. Johnson(ibid) argues that such a suggestion
does not take account of the fact that people enter education with differing personal resources,
something that may affect the outcome of their education. Warnock(1975) discriminates between 'the
right to a certain amount of ['needed'] education and the chance or opportunity to get more ['desired']
education'[cited by Johnson(1990,p.6)].
Johnson (ibid) also refers to Friedman's(1962) neighbourhood effects argument, according to which
a certain governmental interference in education is legitimized. It is often claimed that an educated
individual with his or her actions contributes towards the well being of the whole society. Friedman's
version of liberalism partly supports this argument. In brief, he argues that the fact that education has
certain positive effects does not necessarily mean that the state should provide education. According to
Friedman the state could fund education instead of providing it.
Liberal arguments focus in particular on parental choice. Liberals suggest a policy for parental
choice of a child's education, because as Johnson argues, although parents are not educationalists, they
are educators, 'perhaps the most effective educators that their children have'(Johnson,1990,p.145).
Johnson(ibid) argues that a policy for parental choice would have some beneficial long-term effects.
Schools would acquire clearer aims in order to persuade and attract parents as 'clients'. Professionals
9
would show greater respect to 'clients', i.e to parents, who in turn would show more interest in
education generally and greater commitment to schools their children attend.
However, a withdrawal of the state from the determination of educational aims and their regulation
by the laws of the market would probably cause internal inequalities among the educational institutions
as well as severe social discriminations(e.g. racially or religiously discriminated segregated schools).
Chitty cites the case of Dewsbury, West Yorkshire where a group of parents
'campained for eleven months to send their 7 and 8-year old children to local junior schools where the majority of the children were white instead of to the school which they had been allocated, where 85 per cent of the pupils were of Asian origin. The ensuing court case ended in July 1988 when the Kirklees Education Authority acceded to the parents' demands'.(Chitty,1989,p.223).
This case is subject to various interpretations. It could be suggested though that it should be attempted
to achieve a voluntary consensus between the various social groups and not one derived from a
bureaucratic or institutional coersion. It is claimed that a liberal educational policy could fulfil the
above aim.
Friedman (1962) makes a distinction between education and schooling system. The idea of freedom
of choice of education by parents is grounded on the argument of parental rights as regards the
education of their children. He argues for a privatisation of education and he goes as far as to suggest a
voucher scheme according to which grants should be directly allocated to families who send their
children to privately provided schools.
The New Right policies of the Conservative Party in the U.K. took a favourable stand on parental
choice of a child's education, as it appears in the 1979 Conservative Manifesto, where it is stated that
'extending parents' rights and responsibilities, including their right of choice, will also help raise
standards by giving them greater influence over education' [cited by Chitty(1989,p.195)].
In short, it could be suggested that the liberal approaches to educational policy consider education as
an individual right because it contributes to the individual well-being and to the better placing of the
individual in the labour market. At the same time though, they see the education of an individual to
have certain 'neighbourhood effects', in that it contributes to the well-being of the other individuals as
well. Therefore, they legitimize a degree of state intervention in education in order to secure a certain
level of education and common values in society. However, it is argued that this does not mean that
10
education should be provided by the state and resourced by public money. On the contrary, they
suggest that it should be based on the freedom of individual choice and in particular, as regards general
education, on parental choice.
Marxist approaches
Marxist theoretical approaches put emphasis on the role of education in the modern capitalist state,
on education as a state apparatus and on the relationship between educational institutions and the
society as well as education and social reproduction. They are critical of the contemporary education
systems. In particular, they criticise the liberal educational policies that were previously analysed.
Dale's(1989) work contains a detailed critical presentation of marxist approaches. Although Dale
builds his arguments upon marxism, he criticises traditional marxism and its reductive tendencies. In
particular, as regards the state he argues that 'the State is not a monolith; there are differences within
and between its various apparatuses'(Dale,ibid,p.29). He also mentions that the state should not be
identified with the government or seen as its executive committee. He perceives the government as
'a set of publicly financed institutions, neither separately nor collectively necessarily in harmony, confronted by certain basic problems deriving from its relationship with capitalism, with one branch, the government, having responsibility for ensuring the continuing prominence of those problems on its agenda'.(Dale,ibid,p.57).
Furthermore, he argues that
"the economic and political reproduction that goes on in school goes on in a particular political context[...]. Different kinds of resistance, with both different targets and different forms, are called forth from different groups. The state apparatus is by no means monolithic.[...] The forms of control implemented through educational institutions will not themselves be entirely consistent or free of contradictions. Thus, not only do the basic forms of control-bureaucracy and technocratic management-in their 'pure' forms themselves call forth particular kinds of resistance, but so do the various common combinations of them"(Dale,ibid,p.43).
Dale's analytical approach to marxism attempts to move from a general analysis of the relationship
between education and the state to the interpretation of the precise way in which educational policy is
formed as well as the reasons that lead to such a formation. He is interested in the analysis of the so
called core problems of the educational system. He identifies these problems through an analysis of the
relationship between education and the state. At the same time, he considers necessary to analyse the
11
extent of state intervention in educational institutions as well as the contradictions of the state policies
in contemporary societies.
As regards the attitude of the marxist political tradition, which Dale approached analytically,
towards the freedom of choice issue, which as we have mentioned was introduced by the liberal
political theory and has led to policies of privatisation, it is in sharp contrast to theories and policies
that lead to a control of education by the market forces. As mentioned previously, liberal approaches to
educational policy see the issue of individual freedom as the most important condition that should be
satisfied by every educational policy and therefore they are in favour of a decrease of state
intervention. However, as far as the modern capitalist state and the New Right policies are concerned,
Chitty(1989) makes an important distinction between the liberal and the conservative wings of the
New Right movement and argues that the conservative wing is reluctant to reduce state intervention.
The imposition of the centrally controled National Curriculum in England in 1987 is an action
illustrative of the state interventionist policies of the conservative New Right, which in this way has a
common feature with marxism, although they are at the exact opposite ends of the ideological
spectrum.
Furthermore, Dale's(1989) analytical approach suggests that in fact freedom of choice is very limited
in particular in the public sector. He suggests that 'there is no intrinsic reason why parental
involvement in education should be attached to a private interest rather than a public interest view of
its purposes' and therefore he says that choice should be increased within the state sector but at the
same time he also supports an increase of the realistic alternatives to the state sector, because as far as
Britain is concerned, 'over much of the country there is no choice of secondary school because there is
only one within a traveling distance'(Dale,ibid,pp.118,120) This is true for Greece too.
Welfare State approaches
The development of social welfare policies is based on the argument that the state should secure a
certain level of well-being for all its citizens. According to George and Wilding(1984) and Adler et al
(1989), the welfare policies mainly involve the sectors of employment, social security, housing , health
and education. A main feature of the welfare state theories is that they see the welfare character of the
12
state as a network of institutions that operate complementarily and are mutually connected to each
other. Consequently, education is not examined individually but it is connected to the whole network
of social services of which it is seen as an integral and vital part.
The welfare state approaches are critical of the policies of liberal governments. However, according
to Adler et al(1989), as far as the issue of parental choice of education is concerned, they agree with
the liberal theories up to a certain point. Adler et al(ibid) also argue that the state should develop social
welfare programmes which would provide benefits and services to citizens with the final aim to
promote collective welfare. Adler et al(ibid) argue that the crucial question regarding social welfare
programmes is the extent to which they secure a balance between the individual rights of the 'clients'
and the collective goals in the field of education.
Apart from the enhancement of aggregate levels of well-being, according to Adler et al social
welfare programmes aim at the establishment of equal educational opportunities by 'promoting the fair
or equitable treatment of particular client groups' or by achieving 'fairer or more equitable
outcomes'(Adler et al,ibid,p.1). In brief, George and Wilding(1984) cite the reduction of inequality, the
abolition of poverty and the forging of a new social unity as the central objectives of the welfare state
policies.
Pluralist approaches
The so called pluralist approaches to educational policy stress the fact that power in society is
distributed among several interests and that the policies are formulated through a negotiation between
the various interest groups and the government. In that sense they are the ones that are the closest to
the arguments that are presented in the following chapter.
Pluralists attempt to interpret the educational change by analysing the relationship between
education, state and society. In this analysis they adopt some of the marxist points whereas they
criticize others. Thus, for instance, Salter and Tapper argue that
'It is a part of our thesis that schooling is construed by the needs of capital-[as marxists argue]- but if these needs influence the process of educational change they must be expressed in effective political terms. It is during this stage that the tensions, even contradictions, in the needs of the capital will be revealed'(Salter and Tapper,1981,p.31).
13
According to them, the social functions of the school are to provide 'qualified individuals for the labour
market', to act 'as an agent of social control' and to 'serve as a resource of private consumption'(Salter
and Tapper,ibid,p.37). They are mainly interested in the analysis of the way that educational authority
is exercised and of the role of the state in these authority relationships, in the process of formation of
policies and in educational change. They see educational policy making as the 'process whereby the
various pressures for educational change are translated into formal governmental expression'(Salter
and Tapper,ibid,p.87). Therefore, in order to study the process of formation of educational policies
they suggest that we need to analyse the factors that are pressing for educational change, the way that
these pressures are converted to political demands and the structures that regulate this conversion.
Hargreaves suggests that 'there are two contrasting traditions in the study of educational policy:
pluralism and Marxism'(Hargreaves,1985,p.65). He tries to combine them 'in a theoretically open and
empirically grounded way'.(Hargreaves,ibid,p.80)
Dale criticises pluralism and he cites Offe's(1981) argument that
'pluralist theory tends to explain the existence, strength, and particular articulation of interest organisation by reference to properties of the constituent elements of the organisation: their values, their willingness to sacrifice resources for the pursuit of their interest, their numbers, and so on. That this type of explanation leads at best to a very limited understanding of the dynamics of interest representation becomes evident as soon as we realise that an identical number of interested individuals with identical degrees of determination to defend and promote their interest may produce vastly different organisational manifestations and practices, depending on the political-institutional status their organisation does or does not enjoy. The concrete shape and content of organised interest representation is always a result of interest plus opportunity plus institutional status. To employ structuralist language, we can also say that interest representation is determined by ideological economic and political parameters'[cited by Dale(1989,p.112)]
In turn, pluralist approaches criticise the New Right educational policies implemented in Europe and
the United States, which aimed at the privatisation of education, the limitation of the role of local
authorities and the reinforcement of the role of central government in certain areas. Thatcherism,
which is an example of implementation of New Right policies, 'attempts to stand both for
modernisation and progress and for tradition and stability. The neo-liberal influence emphasizes an
orientation to the future, constant adaptation to new circumstances and an absence of state controls, the
neo-conservative influence stresses an orientation to the past, traditional values and collective
loyalties'.(Ball,1990,p.213). Kassotakis(1994) mentions the appearance of educational neo-
14
conservatism in Greece in 1990 with the assumption of power by the New Democracy Party. As
regards England, Ball argues that the 1988 Act in England can
'be read as signaling the break-up of a national state education system. There is massive potential for greater diversity among schools, but beyond this the separation between the state and private sectors is being blurred.[...] Alongside this, aspects of the Act reduce signifficantly the historic role of local government in educational provision and management'.(Ball,1990,p.214)
At this point, it should be mentioned that to some extent Ball's(ibid) approach deviates from the
traditional pluralist path. As he himself explains, he is rather a Weberian neo-pluralist than a traditional
pluralist and he particularly adheres to the belief that in capitalist societies the economic and business
interests act in such a way that results in the unequal distribution of power in society and impedes the
development of the role of representative institutions. This kind of emphasis placed by Ball explains
his severe criticism of the New Right policies analysed above.
15
2. An interpretation of educational policy
Although the preceding approaches to educational policy provide an explanation of the ideology that
is behind the implementation of a certain educational policy, the making of educational policy should
not be considered merely as an attempt to apply a certain political ideology like the ones presented in
the previous pages. Baldridge defines policy as 'an official commitment to certain goals and
values'(Baldridge,1989,p.63). Thus, this commitment to goals and values should not be seen merely as
the outcome of a pure political will, because it is largely dependent on certain essential problems of
education and the attitudes that are taken towards these problems by the various clashing interests that
intervene in the policy making and implementation process.
Kogan(1975) identifies parliament, central government, local government, teachers, the centres of
academic and research work, students' and parents' interest groups as the main parts of the decision and
policy-making system. It could be argued that the former two parts, i.e parliament and central
government possess a prominent place in this system, but their actions always depend to some extent
on the interests of the other groups mentioned above. It could be suggested that although pluralists
identify the intervening and negotiating role of all these interest groups, they do not suggest which of
these interest groups possess a prominent place in the policy-making process, whereas marxist theories
do stress the importance of the groups that represent the state. On the other hand, although liberal
approaches theoretically stress the prominence of the individual rights, in many cases and in particular,
as we mentioned in the previous chapter, in cases where conservative New Right policies were
implemented, which derive from the liberal ideological spectrum, the state interests are given
considerable significance. Supporters of the welfare state prefer to attribute equal importance to all
interest groups. In fact, it could be suggested that the supporters of social welfare programmes stand
somewhere in the middle between liberal and marxist approaches, because, as we mentioned in the
previous chapter, they are trying to achieve a balance between the individual rights and the collective
public interest.
Lane(1993) attempts to explain the making of public policy by referring to the principal-agent
problem as the crucial point in public policy-making, according to which the politicians, bureaucrats
and professionals in the various public institutions are the agents who are contracted to act according to
16
the interests of the citizens, who are the principals. This principal-agent concept is also applicable to
the relationship between the government and its agencies or bureaux.
The notion of the public interest is at the heart of the interpretation of the public policy-making
process. Public interest is a complicated or in Lane's(ibid) words a labyrinthine notion. Therefore, it is
no wonder that this notion is variously interpreted by the political theories. For instance, marxist
approaches suggest that the public interest would be best pursued by the intervention and the control of
the state,which would secure the existence of social justice through publicly provided education for all
the citizens, whereas liberal approaches largely connect the public interest with the safeguard of the
rights and the freedom of the individual. Lane(ibid) suggests that the public interest is not merely what
the majority of the community wants or an aggregation of interests based on a rational content. He
imposes a limitation in the definition of public interest and argues that 'only those interests could be
public that would be pursued by persons who not only disregard their irrational or non-rational
interests but also by-pass their selfish interests'.(Lane,ibid).
The crucial question is the extent that public policy and more specifically for our case public
educational policy is planned by agents in order to serve the public interest and contribute towards the
achievement of justice and equity and the extent that agents pursue selfish interests. It is true that the
intervention of selfish interests in the policies pursued by state agencies cannot be avoided. After all, as
Lane points out, the concept of interest "has an individualistic 'import' as interest denotes basically
what various persons wish"(Lane,ibid,p.6). Liberal theoretical approaches emphasize the existence of
this individualistic import in their intepretation of public interest. The individualistic import of the
notion of public interest mentioned by Lane implies that public institutions do not always implement
the state interest or the official interests. At the same time though, Lane(ibid) is critical of the public
choice school approach that overestimates the selfish character of the public interest, which sees it
merely as the outcome of an aggregation of individual self-interests. He finds this approach very
simplistic, as it ignores the existence of individual interests that are not only wishes about oneself but
also wishes about social states. In other words, it is suggested that the promotion of selfish interests is
likely to involve other persons as well and in that sense they could have a vicarious character. As
Lane(ibid) mentions, the nature of the interests determines the way they are handled, but this also
depends on the type of public institutions involved in the handling of these interests. In brief,
17
Lane(ibid) argues that public policy-making and implementation is a matter of interest coordination,
something that is also identified by Archer(1985) with the difference that she uses the term negotiation
instead of the term coordination. Salter and Taper(1981) who adopt an approach to educational policy
based on a pluralist ideology also particularly emphasise that educational policy is largely a matter of
change that emerges through bureaucratically controlled negotiations.
At this point, it could be suggested that among Kogan's(1975) identified participatory parts in the
decision and policy-making system of education, parliament and central government have a positive or
innovative power, because they are the parts responsible for the implementation of the various interests
after they consult the interest groups and in particular those that participate in Archer's(1985) external
transaction type of interest negotiation. On the contrary, legitimized educational interest groups such as
teacher associations and student unions could be seen as having a negative or reactionist power in that
they hold some sanctions against government, if its policy is not in accordance with their claims. It is
true though, that, as Kogan(1975) argues, the sanctions that educational interest groups have at their
command are limited compared to the sanctions of industrial trade unions. For instance, he argues that
a teachers' strike
'is a serious irritant to parents, but not at all comparable with industrial action by miners or railwaymen. And it is not a sanction at all in the hands of university teachers, or vice-chancellors, or local authority associations'(Kogan,1975,p.77).
Kogan discriminates between the teachers' associations and the students' unions. In particular, he
argues that the former constitute more or less a part of the authorised system, whereas he refers to the
National Union of Students as a group with an aggressive and critical role, which 'is far more in the
style of a conflictual interest group than any other'(Kogan,ibid,p.76). Concludingly, it is argued by
Kogan that 'if the main associations are reactive rather than innovative, this may be because they
maintain, as a value, the right of local authorities and teachers to develop education rather than develop
it themselves'(Kogan,ibid,p.231).
Archer(1985) focuses on educational policy and breaks down educational-policy making into three
types of negotiation, which she calls internal initiation, external transaction and political manipulation
respectively. Internal initiation involves negotiation with internal interest groups such as education
personnel and possibly students or pupils. External transaction differs from the former type of
18
negotiation in that there is a larger variety of interest groups that are involved in external transaction,
which could be internal and external interest groups with the interaction of the former with the latter
being a voluntaristic one. Central government, local government, parliament are external interest
groups that are able to participate in this type of interest negotiation. Political manipulation constitutes
the alternative channel that is chosen by external groups who want to influence the making of
educational policy but do not have the resources that are required to participate in the interaction that
takes place at the external transaction level or type of negotiation. For instance, it could be suggested
that parents use this alternative channel of influence in order to promote their demands for the
education of their children. Archer(ibid) concludes that educational change is the outcome of all the
above forms of negotiation, which do not take place in isolation from one another but the outcome of
each level of negotiation affects the negotiation that takes place at the other levels.
Apart from the intervention of interest groups in the educational policy-making, Kogan(1975) sees
educational policy to be also a matter of adherence to certain values. In the previous chapters we
presented the main points and values of different theoretical approaches to educational policy. We are
also going to refer to Kogan's(1975,1985) attempt to categorise these values, because we believe that
this will help our interpretation of the educational policy-making process as well as the way that
interest groups intervene in this process.
Kogan(1985) discriminates between four sets of values: educational, social, economic and institutional.
Educational values involve beliefs about the qualities of the educated person. Social values mainly deal
with the issues of socialisation and equality. Kogan defines socialisation as 'the process by which each
generation is inducted into the norms of society'(Kogan,ibid,p.20). As far as education is concerned,
the key issue is the set of the purposes for which children are to be socialized. Equality has proved to
be a conceptually complicated issue. As Kogan argues, contemporary education sees equality as a
matter of reconciliation 'between differentiated learning for individual and common provisions for all
children'(Kogan,ibid,p.21). Economic values see education as a social investment and are mainly
interested in the return of this investment and in particular in the question of whether this return
justifies the particular level of investment made by society. As Kogan(1975) argues, social and
economic values should not be in conflict. On the contrary, he argues that
'social demand has become the imperative- a good to be provided- but education
19
may be so structured that it will also accommodate economic imperatives by providing, where necessary, higher education within categories that mould student preferences to economic needs'(Kogan,ibid,p.64).
It is questionable whether a liberal or a skill focused education will better serve the economic values of
the society as well as the well-being of the individuals. As regards the institutional values Kogan
emphasizes their importance for an interpretation of educational policy-making because 'much of the
activity of the main interest groups is taken up with their promotion'(Kogan,1975,p.65). As
Kogan(1985) mentions, they involve views of how institutions should be governed and their
interpretation varies according to the different meanings that different interest groups attribute to the
various institutional values. Accountability and reliability are, according to Kogan(ibid), the main
qualities that institutional values have to possess. In particular, Kogan (1975,1985) refers to the
participation or generation of community value as one of the newest as well as most ambiguous values,
which we examined in detail in our preceding discussion about the issue of parental choice of
education and the approaches to it of different political ideologies. The way that these values are
assessed by the contradicting interest groups determines the attitudes they take towards what
Dale(1989) calls the core problems of education systems, which in turn together with the current
political and social conditions determine the educational policies and result in a certain way of
monitoring of educational standards, which according to Gonzales and Beaton(1994), is increasingly
becoming one of the main concerns of politicians and researchers.
The concept of educational standards would be central to the following discussion of educational
policy on Hellenic primary education. The educational standards are an indicator of the conditions that
exist in an education system and therefore they could be helpful in our attempt to evaluate and contrast
certain educational policies that were implemented during the period examined by this study.
Thus, the discussion of the attitudes of the various groups that participate in the educational policy-
making process towards the core problems of education would be also related to the educational
standards of the Hellenic primary education system in the corresponding periods regarding its
performance, content, and opportunities to learn.
20
3. Subject of study method and research questions
The subject of this study is the analysis, interpretation and criticism of educational policy on
Hellenic primary education after the fall of the dictatorship and the political change to democracy in
1974, focusing on the two successive historical periods: 1974-1981 and 1981-1989. The time limits of
these two periods are determined by certain political and social facts. In the years 1974-1981 the
liberal-conservative government of the New Democracy party was in power, whereas in 1981 the
socialist government of PASOK(Panhellenic Socialist Movement) came into power and governed the
country till 1989. This governmental change had direct implications for the educational policy. After a
series of elections the New Democracy Party came again into power in 1990, whereas in 1993 another
governmental change occurred with the PASOK party coming in office again. These often
governmental changes during the nineties resulted in less extended reforms than the ones that took
place during the two previous decades.
In particular, this study is going to analyse the state policies and the main reformative attempts
during the period under examination, with the aim on the one hand to interpret the process of the
formation of these policies and on the other hand to evaluate the degree to which these policies
fulfilled certain educational standards. At the same time, an analysis of the educational policies in
these two historical periods will be attempted with the aim to identify the main differences and
conflicts between the educational policies of the two main political parties that governed the country.
Moreover, it is aimed to search the development of educational policy in the period under examination
as well as to analyse the main political factors that influenced the policies of the two parties and of the
interest groups that supported, influenced or opposed these policies. In our attempt to identify the
groups that are involved in the formation of educational policy we are going to analyse the role of the
political parties and particularly of those that were represented in parliament during the period under
examination, the role of educational administration, central and local, the role of teachers' unions as
well as the role of the scientific institutes of Hellenic education such as the Pedagogical Institute and
the Centre for Educational Studies and In-service training(KEME).
An important concept in the analysis and review of the educational policies in this study is that of
the educational standards. As Husen and Tuijnmann suggest 'a standard refers to the degree of
21
excellence required for particular purposes'(Husen and Tuijnmann,1994,p.2) In other words, the
standards are an indicator of the achievements of an education system and in that way they could be
used as a means of evaluation of certain educational policies. Husen and Tuijnman(ibid) refer to three
main types of educational standards: performance standards, content standards and opportunity to learn
standards. In the following discussion this classification of education standards will be used in our
review of the educational policies on Hellenic primary education. The analysis of the educational
policies will reveal the views of the groups involved in the policy-making process about what the
desired educational standards should be and the focus will be on points where conflicting views will be
discovered.
Another important concept in our analysis would be what Dale(1989) calls core problems of
education. It could be suggested that whenever we discover conflicting views about the appropriate
educational standards, then there exists an educational problem. In that sense, the existence of single-
class primary schools in rural areas (schools with one teacher) could be considered as a problem of
Hellenic primary education related to its performance standards. On the one hand, teachers and their
associations have mentioned that these schools provide second class education. Many school advisers
and certain political parties agree with this view and also from a cost-benefit point of view it seems
that the mainteanance of such schools constitutes an irrational organisation of the educational system
and a waste of resources On the other hand though, the development of a policy aiming at the merging
of these school units is opposed by the local authorities in the places where schools are to be abolished.
Thus, this issue which by some groups is considered as a problem by other groups it is seen as the
correct policy regarding the perfomance standards of primary education. The existence of this problem
is also connected with the way that the Hellenic society is structured, e.g the unequal geographical
distribution of the population, the relationship between the centre and the regions, the structure of the
political system etc.
According to the preceding discussion the identification of the educational problems regarding the
standards of an education system is a matter of adherence to certain values and political ideologies but
it is a matter of interest intervention as well. In order to identify these problems we are going to search
the issues that are set as problems by a certain policy which takes action to face them or at least puts
them in the political agenda without solving them. We are also going to search the issues that are
22
raised by the previously mentioned groups involved in the educational policy-making process(political
parties, teachers' associations etc.) as well as those raised by educational research.
The review of the policies in relation to their response to certain educational standards is the
outcome, on the one hand, of the connection of these policies with the historical and social context and
on the other hand of the connection of the empirical framework of the policies with the problems
raised by theory. It could be suggested that the previously discussed theories already identified the
problems at a level of abstraction. According to the general values they adopt, they take certain
attitudes towards these problems. In that sense, theory provides the essential basis for the identification
of the problems of policies as well as their evaluation. For instance, the theoretical approaches have
already set the problem of the relationship between the private and the public sector in education.
Thus, these approaches lead us to issues related to policies in favour of widening the provisions of
public education -as marxist or welfare state models would suggest- or to policies of privatisation and
decrease of state intervention- as liberal models would suggest.
Additionally, the theoretical debate has set the issue of the existence of certain educational standards
as a prerequisite of social reproduction and well-being of the citizens. This demand is mainly put by
the approaches of the welfare state as well as by marxist approaches but it is also to some extent
supported by liberal approaches, although, as we have already mentioned, the latter question the public
character of educational provisions. According to Husen and Tuijnmann(1994) the concept of the
educational standards includes performance standards, content standards and opportunity to learn
standards. Performance standards of primary education include issues like the period of compulsory
schooling, illiteracy rates, content standards involve curricular issues, whereas opportunity to learn
standards involve policies aiming at the safeguarding of equal opportunities and the abolition of the
internal inequalities of the educational system. The fulfilment of these standards is also related to the
issue of the public character of education. Thus, marxist and welfare approaches would like to see
these standards reached through contemporary public educational functions, whereas liberal
approaches would favour private initiative which would let parental choice free.
The issues that will be discussed in the second part of the study will be identified through the
connection of the policies on Hellenic primary education during the period under examination with the
general theoretical debate about the analysis and interpretation of educational policy. In that sense, this
23
study is aiming at a critical approach of the educational policy that was implemented in Greece in the
years that followed the 1974 re-establishment of democracy in the country
In particular, the following questions are going to be discussed
-Which are the aims of the main political and reformative attempts that were implemented by the state
in the periods 1974-1981 and 1981-1989 in primary education as well as whether there are any issues
that were neglected by these aims and attempts.
-Which are the essential differences between these policies as regards the way they handled the
performance, content and opportunity standards of education.
-Which are the groups that mainly influenced the state policies.
The analysis of the above questions is going to provide us with the evidence upon which we are
going to base our criticism. This criticism will involve the way that these policies were formulated, the
correlation between their aims and their results, as well as the evaluation of these policies in relation to
their perceptions of problems regarding the standards of primary education.
At this point, it should be mentioned that the preceding theoretical discussion, from which we
formed the theoretical concepts that will be used in the following analysis, mainly refers to the British
society and educational system. Therefore, the essential differences between the structure of the
educational system to which the theoretical debate is referred and the Hellenic education should be
mentioned. Such differences are the decentralised structure of the British educational system as well as
the fact that while parental involvement in school administration is legitimized in the U.K., in Greece,
as Duncan mentions, the educational system 'brooks no power sharing with
parents'(Duncan,1982,p.12). Thus, in our attempt to use this theoretical framework for the
interpretation of the educational policies in Greece, we should bear in mind the existence of certain
differences between the British and the Hellenic educational systems, like the ones mentioned above.
24
PART II
STANDARDS OF PRIMARY EDUCATION IN GREECE AND
THE EDUCATIONAL POLICY SINCE 1974
1. The opportunity to learn standards.-Equality of educational
opportunities
According to Bottani and Tuijnman(1994), opportunity to learn standards mainly include the inputs
into education and in the following pages we are going to search whether the implemented policies
resulted in the provision of equal educational opportunities for all the student population of the
country. Thus, it is obvious that we are going to search factors that cause differences in performance
within a country which according to Postlethwaite(1994) were not as successfully measured as
differences in achievement between different countries, as far as the measurements conducted by the
International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement(IEA) are concerned. In
particular, we are going to discuss the views about compensating policies that were implemented in
order to balance the existing inequalities of opportunities as well as the public versus private education
issue.
In the recent years the problem of social inequality in education has been discussed by some studies
regarding Greece. From this relatively small number of Greek studies that discuss this problem it is
concluded that selection and reproduction of social inequalities are two existing features of the
Hellenic educational system.
Iliou(1984) has found the rural, women and ethnic minority population to have limited educational
opportunities and Palios(1984) also argues that students who come from the village or the country
town are at a disadvantage compared with students who come from Athens and Thessaloniki, the two
main urban centres of the country. Papakonstantinou(1986) searches the relationship between school
achievement and social origin in compulsory education. His theoretical analysis is based on the marxist
approach to the relationship between education, society and the state. His study found a strong
relationship between school achievement and social origin and he concludes that 'the Hellenic school
today is a capitalist school that goes under a phase of a timid
25
modernization'(Papakonstantinou,1986,p.204). Fragoudaki(1985) also argues that according to the
existing research evidence it appears that 'school achievement is determined by social
origin'(Fragoudaki,1985,p.185), whereas Rougeri cites the conclusions of Katsikas' study who argues
that 'children of families with low non-fixed income, children of illiterate parents, immigrants, refugees
and gypsies are more likely never to complete compulsory education'[cited by Rougeri(1996,p.67)]
The 1975 Committee for Education in its report (MNERA,1975) does mention the issue of the
equality of opportunities but only as regards private education. DOE(Primary school teacher
Federation of Greece) in its discussion of Law 1566/1985 on the Organisation of primary and
secondary education stated that education should be based on 'the safeguarding of equal opportunities
in education for all children irespectively of their social and economic situation, the cultural level and
the geographical area of their residence'[Teaching Tribune1,1985,(966),p.3]. In that spirit the vice
president of the union suggested 'as a first step[...] the inter-curricular assistance and as a next what we
call all-day school'(Teaching Tribune,ibid,p.7).
PASOK's 1981 pre-election programme also mentions that 'additional educational assistance would
be provided in primary school for all the pupils who need it', although there is no clear reference to
equality of opportunities.(PASOK,1981,paragraph 92). Instead, there are more general references to
the surpassing of discriminations and to the equality of the two sexes. The left puts particular emphasis
on the problem of lack of equal opportunities in education. In its 1981 pre-election programme it
demands that 'class barriers should be abolished, the unified nine-year compulsory school should be
put into practice and equal opportunities for the education of all the young people should be
secured'[cited in Teaching Tribune(1981,901,p.3)]. KKE suggests that education should be
democratized and modernized and that private education should be abolished.
New Democracy referred to the equality of opportunities only in its 1989 pre-election programme
where it is stated that 'the equality of opportunities in education imposes the equality on the starting
point and on every point of the educational progress of young people', but it is mentioned that private
education should also exist 'in order to secure the right of free choice'(ND,1989,p.11).
New Democracy criticizes two changes that occurred in the eighties which could be considered as
the most important ones regarding the bluntness of educational inequalities. These are the abolition of
numerical marking in primary school, which as Kassotakis mentions was replaced by 'qualitative
26
profiling evaluation techniques' and of the examinations in primary school and the gymnasium, the
lower compulsory secondary school(Kassotakis,1994,p.110).
Maurogiorgos is particularly critical of the policies implemented by New Democracy when it
reassumed power in 1990 and he argues that 'at least one hundred years of criticism have not been
proved enough for a persuasive and effective challenge and question of conservative choices in
educational policy making'(Maurogiorgos,1990,p.15). He further argues that 'education is becoming a
more and more expensive matter, the educational changes do not materialize the promises for equality
of educational opportunities'(Maurogiorgos,ibid,p.21).
Some compensating programmes such as supportive teaching and the Programme of Creative
Occupation of Students-children of Working Parents2 were put into practice in the eighties and it is
true that such programmes constitute remarkable initiatives. However, the implementation of these
initiatives remained at an experimental level mainly because of various problems such as lack of
resources or specialized teaching staff.
As regards the public versus private education debate it should be mentioned that according to the
1975 Constitution 'education constitutes a basic mission for the State' and also
'all Greeks are entitled to free education on all levels at State educational institutions. The State shall provide financial assistance to those who distinguished themselves, as well as to students in need of assistance or special protection, in accordance with their abilities'(Appendix).
This public-state provision of education is connected with the equality of opportunities issue,
although the existence of the former does not necessarily secure the existence of the latter.
It is true that the provision of public education in Greece is inadequate, something that has been
suggested even by ministers of education. For instance, Kontogiannopoulos, who became Minister of
Education in the 1990 New Democracy government and was also Undersecretary of Education from
1976 till 1981, argues that "the famous 'free' Education is nothing else than one more myth of the
irresponsible demagogy and the main cause of today's standard of public education. Because the
Hellenic state never had the economic strength to undertake the cost of an Education with quality that
would be offered without exception to all the children of the Greek
people"(Kontogiannopoulos,1991,p.38).
The parallel provision of private education is established by the Constitution(article 16, paragraph
27
8). However its role was questioned several times. Thus, the 1975 Committee for Education mentions
that private education 'has become a serious social problem'(MNERA,1975,p.29).
In Teaching Tribune[1983(935)] DOE suggests the generalization of pre-school education, the
foundation of Child Centres as well as the abolition of private schools.
The left also expresses its disagreement with the operation of private education and Farakos(1984)
suggests that private education should be gradually absorbed by public education, which has to be
upgraded. PASOK in its 1981 pre-election programme also argues that private education should be
abolished, but it suggests that 'provisions should be taken to secure the people who are currently
employed in private education' as well as that 'those of the claims of the school owners that are fair
would be met by the Constitution'(PASOK,1981,paragraph 103). However in the following years
PASOK seems to take a more friendly attitude towards private education, because we cannot find any
similar suggestions. It rather prefers to speak for a general upgrading of public education instead.
New Democracy is a defender of private education, something that is particularly evident in its 1989
programme, where although it is accepted that 'the state has the duty to provide the citizens with
education in public schools of high quality' it is also suggested that 'private initiative has the right of its
free expression in the educational sector', something that is a clear indication of adoption of neo-liberal
approaches(ND,1989,p.26).
In general, it is a fact that, in the period we examine, the deficiences of the public sector of
education continued to exist and that the PASOK governments did not take any measures against the
development of private education despite PASOK's pre-1981 criticism of private schooling.
28
2. The content standards
Husen and Tuijnman argue that the content standards 'define those parts of the content in the
curriculum that all students should master'(Husen and Tuijnman,1994,p.2), whereas Bottani and
Tuijnamn(1994) see the content standards as the processes of education. In our attempt to explore the
content standards of Hellenic primary education we are going to discuss policies on the primary
curriculum and the textbooks as well as policies on the close-related issue of primary school teacher
training and educational research.
According to Terzis(1988) the content standards are connected with the internal educational
reforms. He discriminates between internal and external educational reforms suggesting that the former
involve the organizational aspect of education, whereas the latter involve the so called 'core of
educational reality' and include reforms 'in the internal structure of school', 'in the selection of
educational goods and the learning contents' and the 'initial and in-service training of
teachers'(Terzis,1988,p.14).
One issue that is related to the content standards is the language question, which is going to be
discussed in the final chapter of this study. Fragoudaki(1987) suggests that the language question and
the conflicts about it hid the essential conflict within the bourgeois class between the bourgeois liberal
and conservative forces. The solution to the language question that was given in 1976 with the
establishment of demotiki3 as the language of instruction in schools does not mean that the
conservative forces ceased to exist and to press for a review of the current educational policy.
The debate about the educational reforms also deals with the issues of the curricula, the textbooks
and the teaching methods. According to the MNERA(1975) Report of the Committee for Education, a
completely primary curriculum should be designed with the participation of several groups such as the
Ministry of Education, teachers and educationalists. It is also emphasized that demotiki should be the
language of instruction. The report also recognizes the necessity of the introduction of foreign
languages in the primary curriculum, but it is suggested that this should happen in the future because
'at present we are not ready to offer foreign languages in the right way to the primary school
pupils'(MNERA,1975,p.19).
The report is very critical of the current textbooks of the primary school as regards their content,
29
quality and suitability. It is suggested that there should be three approved textbooks for each subject
instead of one so that the teacher would be able to make a choice. The free provision of textbooks is
suggested to be restricted only to indigent students. DOE would several times suggest the review of the
primary curriculum and the textbooks[(Teaching Tribune,1975,780), (Teaching Tribune,1979,854),
(DOE,1984)].
Another important curricular issue is the connection of the primary curriculum with the lower
secondary curriculum in order to have a unified curriculum for the compulsory schooling period. It is
true that DOE did not present any particular suggestions for this issue, whereas PASOK identified it
only in very broad terms when it mentioned that 'the nine-year compulsory education will become
essential' and thus it recognized that at that time compulsory education was not
essential(PASOK,1981.paragraph 101). In general, PASOK's 1981 pre-election programme talks about
a 'radical change of the content of studies'as well as a radical change of the teaching methods and the
teacher-student relationships(PASOK,ibid,paragraph 93) .
At the same time, KKE suggests 'the establishment of the unified nine-year school' through the
merging of the primary school and the gymnasium 'in order to avoid the unnecessary recycling of
knowledge, to control better the compulsory attendance of the student up to the end, to secure a righter
material and technical substructure with the union of the oligothesia schools4'(Farakos,1984,p.21).
The problem of the curricula and the textbooks was particularly emphasized by New Democracy in
the eighties, when it is in opposition. New Democracy(1989) suggested a periodic review of the
curriculum and the textbooks and it favoured the abolition of the one and only textbook per subject and
the establishment of free choice.
From the above mentioned views of the political parties and the union of primary school teachers
about the primary curriculum and the textbooks it is evident that the content standards of the Hellenic
primary education are problematic. The two main political parties which alternate in power accuse
each other for not raising the content standards through the modernization of the primary curriculum
and the textbooks.
The state policy regarding the content standards is the responsibility of the MNERA and was
implemented by KEME till 1985 and by the Pedagogical Institute from 1985 onwards which as
Terzis(1988) mentions were under the direction of the MNERA. According to OECD one of the
30
curriculum developments that has been observed after the creation of KEME was the 'preparation of
new and modernized syllabi for the kindergartens and the primary schools'(OECD,1980,p.146).
However, a more radical change occurred in the eighties when, according to Kassotakis(1994) and the
MNERA(1995) report, the nursery and primary curricula were completely revised. As MNERA(1995)
mentions, from the 1987-88 school year the foreign language was introduced in the primary curriculum
and the teaching of arts and crafts and physical education was undertaken by specialised secondary
school teachers. At this point, it should be mentioned that this last development is indicative of the
incompetence of primary school teacher education to provide specialised teachers, an incompetence
that continues to exist in the nineties.
Apparently, the most important development regarding the content of primary education occurred in
the eighties when PASOK was in power. However, as Terzis(1988) mentions these developments
failed to connect the primary curriculum with the lower secondary curriculum, something that should
have followed the establishment of the nine-year compulsory education. Thus, he argues that in certain
subjects such as history or religion students are taught twice the same things.
31
Initial and in-service training of primary school teachers
Primary school teacher education is a close-related issue with the content standards of primary
education, because primary school teachers are the persons responsible for the delivery of the primary
curriculum and the teaching of the subject matter included in the approved textbooks. Therefore,
curricular developments have to keep pace with developments in primary school teacher education.
As Bouzakis(1993) mentions from 1933 till 1982 primary school teachers were educated in the
pedagogical academies where they attended two-year courses. Bouzakis also mentions the lack of any
major change in teacher training after the fall of the dictatorship, despite the demands of the opposition
parties and teachers' unions for 'integration of the pedagogical academies into the
university'(Bouzakis,ibid,p.24).
Pedagogical academies were deeply criticized for the quality of education that they provided, for the
short duration of the studies and for the fact that they produced primary school teachers that according
to Bouzakis(ibid) were merely technicians. Moreover, the fact that the Pedagogical Academies were
disconnected from universities was criticized and it was suggested that it resulted in the academic,
social and ideological isolation of primary school teachers and indeed Bouzakis agrees that the
pedagogical academies 'were conservative and politically centrally steered
institutions'(Bouzakis,ibid,p.26).
32
TABLE 1
Level of education of primary school teachers
Level State schools Private schools Total
1 5,583 15.62 182 8.01 5,765 15.17
2 4,094 11.46 69 3.03 4,163 0.95
3 231 0.64 33 1.45 264 0.69
4 1,229 3.4479 3.47 1,308 3.44
5 29 0.081 0.04 30 0.07
Levels
1:Total number of teachers with postgraduate education
2:Teachers who received in-service training in Greece
3:Teachers who received in-service training abroad
4:Second degree holders
5:PhD holders
In each column the first number is the count and the second is the percentage. All percentages refer to
the ratio of primary school teachers at each level of education in relation to the total number of primary
school teachers employed in state and private schools.
Source:Process of data contained in ESYE(1995,p.75)
In the above table we can see the level of education of primary school teachers serving in the state
and private schools of the country in the school year 1985-86. According to this table 15.17 per cent of
the teachers have received some education beyond that of the Pedagogical Academy, i.e in-service
training or another degree. The largest difference is observed in the percentages of the state and private
primary school teachers that have received in-service training in Greece with that of state school
teachers being significantly higher. The most possible explanation of this difference is that private
education mainly employs teachers that have just completed initial teacher education and do not have
the required teaching experience to study in the schools of in-service training.
33
From the percentages contained in the above table it is obvious that the educational level of primary
school teachers is certainly low with only 15.17 percent of the teachers to have received some
education beyond that which granted them a qualified teacher status, which until the mid eighties was
the completion of a two-year course in the Pedagogical Academies. This fact is worrying because as
Papakonstantinou argues teacher education 'is the epicentre of the relative discussions because on the
form and the quality of education depends the success and effectiveness of teaching
practice'(Papakonstantinou,1986,p.17).
The need to upgrade primary school teacher education is recognised by all political parties but there
are different views about the form that it should take. In general terms, New Democracy seems to
favour an upgrading of the studies within the existing Pedagogical Academies, whereas PASOK and
the left support the integration of primary school teacher education into universities.
In 1982 by Law 1262/82 the university Pedagogical Departments of Primary Education and Nursery
School Teachers were founded. These replaced the Pedagogical Academies. They started to operate in
the academic year 1984-85 and provided four-year courses leading to a teacher qualification instead of
the two-year courses of the Pedagogical Academies. Papakonstantinou(1990) identifies certain
problems and inconsistencies that exist in the Pedagogical Departments. Thus, he argues that they
rather modernized the vocational training of teachers and kept them under the ideological and political
control of the state than liberated and promoted the development of educational studies.
As regards in-service training of primary school teachers, the most important development occurred
in 1985 when, as Bouzakis(1994) mentions, PEK(Regional Centres of Further Education) were
established by Law 1566/85(articles 28 and 29). However, the materialization of the provisions of the
above articles went under several phases and in the eighties occurred only at an experimental level in
the universities of Thessaloniki and Ioannina, which according to Bouzakis(ibid) made notable
attempts but, as he continues, in the early nineties the New Democracy government changed the mode
of operation of PEK and excluded the universities, the Institutes of Tecnological Education(TEI) and
the schools from the provision of in-service training for teachers and PEK came under the tight state
and ideological control.
34
Educational Research
It could be suggested that educational research is another issue that is close-related to the formation
of education practice and programmes, because this formation is to a large extent based on the
developments in educational research.
It is true that educational research is not very much developed neither in the newly founded
university Pedagogical Departments nor in non-university research centres. According to
Pesmazoglou(1987) the public expenditure for research was only 0.2 per cent of the 1985 Gross
Domestic Product.
Apart from the research done at academic level, educational research is also done at institutions
managed by MNERA, i.e KEME till 1985 and the Pedagogical Institute from 1985 onwards, which
according to Dervisis(1985) constitutes the most basic institution of the academic-pedagogical aspect
of education. According to the legal framework KEME and the Pedagogical institute consult the
MNERA on issues regarding the primary and secondary curriculum and textbooks and indeed they are
the main institutions which work out the curricula and textbooks of primary and secondary education
in the period we examine.
Gerou criticizes KEME for its centralised character and for the fact that it lacked autonomy and he
argues that 'the systematic research and study of the educational problems normally belongs to the
schools of education of the universities which should be founded in all the universities in order to
undertake, at last, the research of educational problems'(Gerou,1981,p.35). As we mention above, in
1985 KEME was replaced by the Pedagogical Institute. At this point, it should be mentioned that this
institute was initially established in 1964 but it was abolished in 1967 by the dictatorial regime.
Terzis(1988) compares the 1964 and 1985 Pedagogical Institutes and KEME examining the provisions
of the corresponding laws that founded these institutions. He finds many similarities as regards the
character, the staff and leadership appointments and the composition of the main and assistant staff. He
argues that this similarity of the three legal texts is problematic because the differences between 1964
and 1985 as regards the circumstances are highly important and they are not reflected by the 1985
legislation. Thus, he concludes that 'if the 1975 legislation simply restores the 1964 legislation, the
1985 attempt is something more than another restoration, it is an anachronism'(Terzis,ibid,p.98).
In general it could be suggested that neither KEME nor Pedagogical Institute have made the
35
expected contribution to educational research. As Terzis(ibid) argues it is impossible to reconcile a
dependence from the Ministry of Education with scientific research, "which is impossible to be done
by an 'administrative' service with expeditory or consultative[...] duties"(Terzis,ibid,p.81).
36
3.The Performance Standards
In this part educational policies will be examined in relation to the performance standards which
according to Husen and Tuijnman(1994) indicate how well students who enter an education system
with certain educational opportunities perform in its content areas. In particular, we are going to focus
on the issues of student dropout and illiteracy, on the internal differences among Hellenic primary
schools and also on an important determinant of the quality of education and thus its performance
standards, the expenditure on primary education.
Compulsory education and student dropout
These are two interrelated issues and both constitute indicators of the performance standards of an
education system. According to the 1975 Constitution 'the years of compulsory education should be no
less than nine'(Appendix). The question is to what extent constitutional directives are put into practice.
An examination of the student dropout percentages would be helpful in our attempt to answer the
above question.
37
TABLE 2
Allocation of school population of primary education in each grade. School years 1975/76-1980/81.
1975/76 1976/77 1977/78 1978/79 1979/80 1980/81
Grade
1st 163,401
2nd 155,751
3rd 154,507
4th 153,229
5th 151,408
6th 152,439
Source:ESYE(1986,p.47)
From the numbers contained in the above table it follows that 6.71 per cent of the students that
entered primary school in 1975 did not reach the last grade in 1980. According to the numbers
provided by ESYE the corresponding percentage for the next six years(1980-1985) is 1.34 per
cent(ESYE,1995,p.49). This is certainly a significant fall and indicates that in the early eighties nearly
all students attended at least the six-year primary school, something which is largely due to the efforts
that commenced with the 1976 educational reform and aimed at the raising of the school leaving age.
In particular, the policies of the extension of compulsory education implemented from 1976 and the
abolition of examinations and the numerical marking system in the primary school in the eighties
helped the unimpeded promotion of the students in the primary school grades. Thus, we would agree
with Iliou who argues that 'the establishment of the nine year compulsory education, the abolition of
the gymnasium entrance examination and the automatic promotion are very positive measures of
educational policy, despite all the reservations that may be expressed as regards the way they were
planned and implemented(Iliou,1984,p.70). Such reservations are based on the fact that, as
Markopoulos argues, after the application of the extension of primary education from 6 to 9 years in
the school year 1980-81
"the increase in the number of pupils who were registered in the first class of the 'Gymnasium' was not sufficient to make that number equal to the total number of pupils who had finished primary school. About 10 or 15 percent of the total of pupils who finished primary school received no further education"(Markopoulos,1986,p.200).
38
Finally, it should be mentioned that the actual percentage of students who do not finish primary
school may be a little higher due to the existence of a small number of children who never enrolled in
school, although it is true that from the eighties onwards such numbers tend to zero.
Literacy
This is a very important issue related to the performance standards of education with significant
social implications. Given the fact that, as Dimaras(1987) mentions, in Greece primary education has
been compulsory since 1834 and free since 1885, one would expect that the problem of illiteracy
would have been wiped out. However, research studies and statistical data show that the problem of
illiteracy still exists. Iliou identifies the groups that are educationally disadvantaged when she mentions
that 'the birth of a girl from poor parents in a remote village is not a good omen for a successful
attendance at school'(Iliou,1984,p.30).
TABLE 3
Illiterates and semi illiterates in counts and percentages in districts
Districts Population over 10yo Semi illiterates % Absolute illiterates %
Urban 4,754,913 570,567 12.00 248,492 5.23
Semi urban 945,333 170,752 18.06 95,813 10.14
Rural 2,514,795 540,520 21.49 362,416 4.40
Total 8,215,041 1,281,839 16.60 706,721 8.60
Source:Vergidis and Papakostopoulos(1984)
Table 3 indicates that in 1981 8.60 per cent of the population over 10 years old were absolute
illiterates, whereas 16.60 per cent did not finish elementary education and could be regarded as semi or
functional illiterates, who according to Gray(1956) are persons who have 'not acquired the knowledge
and skills in reading and writing which enable[them] in all those activities in which literacy is
assumed'[cited by Jansen(1989,p.309)].
According to the percentages contained in table 3 the problem of illiteracy is more serious in rural
areas. This fact as well as Vergidis' and Papakostopoulos'(1984) mention that 80 per cent of the
39
absolute illiterates are women confirm Iliou's previously cited argument.
Quite recently, in 1987, the problem of illiteracy was discussed by DOE and it asked for special
programmes for the fight against illiteracy in the primary school[Teaching Tribune,1987(1015)].
PASOK suggested that 'illiteracy has not been hit in its root'(PASOK,1981,paragraph 97). In 1989
New Democracy argued that the problem of illiteracy still exists mentioning that 'the quality of
education is low. Discouraging phenomena of ignorance in writing, reading and even in counting are
observed in the pupils of primary schools'(New Democracy,1989,p15). Vergidis and Papakostopoulos
mention that although illiteracy mainly involves old age groups 'it has not been entirely wiped out in
young ages'(Vergidis and Papakostopoulos,1984,p.20). The fact that until recently it was not
recognised that illiteracy involves young ages as well, resulted in the perception of this issue as a
problem only of the adult population and thus the implemented policies ignored the problem of
illiteracy in young age groups. The only measure that was taken to face illiteracy in schooling age is
the provision of support teaching which according to Kassotakis(1994) is given to children with
learning difficulties and to low achievers in primary school and the gymnasium from school year 1987-
88 onwards, but the application of this measure is restricted only to the large urban schools, whereas,
as mentioned above, the problem of illiteracy is more intense in rural areas. It is apparent that more
attention should be given to the problem of reproduction of functional illiteracy.
The primary schools
The performance of the students depends to a large extent on the qualities of the primary schools in
which they study. The OECD(1995) review of educational policy in Greece mentions that there are
sensational differences among schools as regards the quality of the buildings, the physical
environment, the quality of the equipment and the audio-visual aids.
The existence of many remote areas and on the other hand the overwhelming gathering of
population in the urban centres and mainly in the greater Athens area, where nearly one third of the
total population is gathered, results in the maintenance of a large number of schools with less than one
teacher per grade(oligothesia) as well as large school units with many classrooms in urban centres.
This fact creates many internal inequalities regarding the quality of education provided.
According to ESYE(1995) in the school year 1985-86 64.82 per cent of the Hellenic primary schools
employed from one to three teachers. As far as the pupil:teacher ratio is concerned, this varies from 18
40
pupils per teacher in rural areas to 27 in the greater Athens area and in Thessaloniki with the national
average being 23 pupils per teacher(ESYE,1995,p.47). According to Kontogiannopoulou-Polydorides
et al in 1991-92 the national pupil:teacher ratio had further fallen to 20 pupils per
teacher(Kontogiannopoulou-Polydorides et al,1994,p.2517).This improvement is not only due to an
increase of the number of teachers from 35,722 to nearly 39,000 but also due to a decrease of the
number of pupils(from 836,061 to approximately 791,000)in the correspoding years due to the decline
of the birth rate, a serious social problem which is particularly mentioned by Pantelouris(1980).
Current trends are even worse. In 1995-96 110,000 children entered the primary school(Free
Press,4/7/96,p.2), whereas in 1975-76 the corresponding number was 163,401(table 1), something
which means that in these twenty years that elapsed the number of students that entered primary
education decreased by 32.69 per cent. As a result of this decrease in the pupil numbers, in the next
school year(1996-97) 128 schools will be abolished and 130 will operate with less teachers because of
lack of pupils. This will have as a consequence the abolition of 501 places of teachers(Free Press,ibid).
TABLE 4
State primary schools in urban, semi-urban and rural areas.
Urban areas Semi-urban areas Rural areas
N of teachers
1 51 34 2852
2 57 38 1523
3 57 51 711
4 44 22 235
5 21 16 131
6 425 143 191
7 84 45 60
8 100 49 21
9 96 35 14
10 87 25 9
41
11 27 6 -
12 727 64 19
13 65 4 1
14 54 6 1
15 or more 78 2 1
Total 1973 540 5769
Pupils per teacher 26 24 18
Source:ESYE(1995,p.47)
The above table gives a detailed description of primary schools as regards the number of teachers
and the pupils:teacher ratios in school year 1985-86. According to this table the most frequent type of
primary school has twelve teachers in urban areas, six teachers in semi-urban areas and one teacher in
rural areas with the average pupil:teacher ratio being 26, 24 and 18 respectively.
Gerou identifies the implications in the quality of the education that have the schools with one and
two teachers as well as the over-subscribed schools in the labour settlements of the big cities. In
particular, he argues that
'from the 10000 primary schools that operate in the country, 5000 have one or two teachers and we cannot be proud for the elementary education that is provided in schools with one or two teachers, under the conditions they operate'(Gerou,1985,p.58).
Mantos (1982) also identifies problems that exist in the oligothesia rural schools, such as the little
amount of direct teaching that pupils receive which also makes it difficult for the teacher to know how
an individual pupil is working at any given time, the high failure and dropout rates and the low
intellectual and cultural background of the pupils' familes which results in very poor parental
involvement in school businnes.
As regards the over-subscribed schools of the working class areas in urban centres Gerou argues that
'these schools suffer'(Gerou,1985,p.58).
In order to face the problem of the over-subscribed schools Law 309/1976 established a
pupil:teacher ratio of 30, whereas Law 1566/1985 lowered this ratio to 25 for schools with one or two
teachers. As far as the problem of the small primary schools is concerned, although there was a general
42
consensus among the several governments and the primary school teachers' union regarding the
merging of oligothesia schools into central primary schools, the implementation of such a policy was
proved to be problematic mainly due to the local opposition of the residents of the areas where schools
were to be abolished. Law 1566/1985(article 4, paragraph 13) provided for the establishment of central
primary schools.
It is true that the number of oligothesia schools has been decreased, but this was mainly due to the
internal immigration of the population from the villages into the urban centres and not because of the
effective implementation of the policies mentioned above. Moreover as Ntountoulakis mentions very
often
'the pupils of schools with one teacher, which are abolished because they did not gather the minimum number of children(3-8 pupils), are obliged to attend another one-teacher school in another village'(Ntountoulakis,1989,p.265).
Educational expenditure
Educational expenditure is an important educational input which according to Bottani and
Tuijnman(1994) combined with social and cultural factors determines the outcomes of education and
thus, it is closely related to the performance standards of education but affects its opportunity to learn
and content standards as well. As Mantos(1982) mentions, public education is mainly financed through
taxation with current and capital educational expenditure being included in the annual state budget.
43
TABLE 5
Share of the total expenditure on primary education in relation to the total educational expenditure(a).
Share of educational expenditure on the state budget(b).
Year a(%) b(%)
1974 36.20 13.50
1975 36.46 10.40
1976 36.41 10.63
1977 34.38 11.69
1978 34.80 12.18
1979 37.21 11.24
1980 34.32 11.06
1981 35.02 10.50
1982 34.71 9.88
1983 33.38 9.72
1984 33.17 10.70
1985 31.57 10.20
1986 32.99 10.20
1987 32.81 9.47
1988 35.34 8.90
1989 30.27 8.54
1990 30.64 8.05
1991 32.62 8.16
1992 32.35 8.16
1993 31.56 7.32
1994 31.55 6.99
1974-81(mean)35.68 11.51
1981-89(mean)33.25 9.83
1990-94(mean)31.74 7.73
Source:a:process of data contained in MNERA(1995, table VI B5),b:MNERA(ibid,tableVI B2).
44
Table 5 presents the share of total educational expenditure on primary education in relation to the
total educational expenditure as well as the share of education expenditure on the state budget. From
the 1974-81,1981-89 and 1990-94 means we observe a decrease of both shares. As regards the
decrease of the share of expenditure on primary education we would agree with Kontogiannopoulou-
Polydorides et al(1994) who attributed it to the decrease of enrolments due to the fall of the birth rate
as well as the increase of the enrolments in secondary education that followed the extension of
compulsory education. Moreover, it could be argued that the establishment of post-compulsory
vocational and technical education and the continuous expansion of higher education also contributed
to this decrease of the share of primary education in educational expenditure. As regards the decrease
in the share of the total educational expenditure, the result was, according to Kassotakis, in 1985 the
total public education expenditure to represent only 2.9 per cent of the Gross National Product, the
smallest recorded for the EU countries(Kassotakis,1994,p.114).This fact is to a large extent due to the
high military expenditure of Greece because of the problems with its eastern neighbour, Turkey, which
result in the restriction of the expenditure in all other sectors including that of education. At this point
though, it should be mentioned that according to the OECD(1995) review, if in the total public
educational expenditure we add the private educational expenditure and the expenditure for studies
abroad, then Greece would be among the countries that devote the largest funds to education instead of
being among the countries that devote the lowest ones. In any case, it is a fact that an increase of the
total educational expenditure appears to be more than necessary, if Hellenic primary education
standards are to be further improved.
45
4. Reforms and policies on primary education
With the re-establishment of constitutional legitimacy and parliamentary democracy in 1974 the
issue of educational reform was brought forward again more emphatically by teachers' associations as
well as by political parties.
The New Democracy government proceeded to the development of a new legal framework for the
structure and the efficient operation of General Education. For this reason, the government formed
two committees which would draw up a law-plan5 for General Education. The first consisted of agents
of the Ministry of Education as well as representatives of the unions of primary and secondary school
teachers, whereas the second consisted of university tutors and teachers.
However, according to Dimaras(1979) the findings of these committees were very little considered
in the formation of the new legal framework for the organisation and administration of General
Education. Kazamias(1978) suggests that the main aim of the discussions that were held with the
participation of these committees before the 1976 educational reform was to calm down and balance
the contradictions within the New Democracy party between tendencies towards modernization and a
conservative liberalism.
Before we examine in detail the provisions of the main educational reforms that occurred in the
following years we should particularly focus on the Ministry of National Education and Religious
Affairs, as this is the main policy making body of the Hellenic education system, the administration of
which is highly centralised and bureaucratically organised as Mantos(1982), Holmes(1988)
Kassotakis(1994), and Kontogiannopoulou-Polydorides et al(1994) mention. In particular, according to
Kassotakis
'all decisions pertaining to curricula, textbooks, school timetables, the appointment and advancement of teaching staff, the establishment and equipment of schools are made by the Ministry of Education uniformly introduced to schools'(Kassotakis,1994,p.110).
At the top of the MNERA stands the Minister who is assisted by two deputy Ministers. At the local
level there exist regional educational directorates for each level of education but as Holmes points out
'no independent departures from the countrywide uniformity of the education system are
permitted'(Holmes,1983,p.360). The Minister and the deputy ministers are political figures that are
46
appointed by each government, which in this way exercises its control over the Ministry. The fact that
the Minister is a political figure along with the fact that educational policy is almost exclusively
decided by him according to Kontogiannopoulou-Polydorides et al 'holds the government directly
accountable to the electorate and thus subject to pressures from both the public and teachers'
unions'(Kontogiannopoulou-Polydorides,1994,p.2516) Thus it could be suggested that through this
exercise of pressure the public and teachers' unions have a chance to negotiate their interests with the
government and to influence the educational policy making process.
The most important institutional arrangements that occurred in the educational reform of the mid
seventies are the Law 309/1976 'On the Organisation and Administration of General Education', the
Law 576/1977 'On Organisation and Administration of Secondary and Higher Vocational and
Technical Education' and the Law 186/1975 on the Organization of KEME(Centre for Educational
Studies and In-service training). According to OECD(1980), the main changes that were made by this
legislation are the extension of compulsory education from 6 to 9 years(ages 51/2 to 141/2, 6 years of
primary and 3 years of secondary education), the establishment of demotiki as the language of
instruction at all levels of education and the introduction of technical and vocational education as an
alternative to general education at the post-compulsory schooling level. The extension of compulsory
education was followed by the abolition of the entrance examinations to secondary education and the
introduction of entrance examinations to lyceum, the three-year post-compulsory secondary school
instead. This introduction was established by the Presidential Decree 503/1977. Curricula and
textbooks were partially revised and the study of ancient Greek texts in modern Greek translations was
introduced in gymnasium, the three-year compulsory secondary school(ages 111/2 to 141/2).
PASOK and KKE(Communist Party of Greece) deeply criticized these reforms and a milder
criticism was expressed by KKE of the interior(the second communist party participating in
parliament). In particular, Farakos, who was the President of the Section of Education of KKE's
Central Committee argues that
"the Right with its notorious educational 'reforms' attempted to give the youth limited and low-quality knowledge, far away from the contemporary conquests of science and technology and even from the achievements of the bourgeois thought and heritage, knowledge completely undermined"(Farakos,1984,p.11).
The other parties of the Parliament6, EDHK(Union of the Democratic Centre) and EDA(Union of the
47
Democratic Left) appeared to agree with the reforms to a large extent. Kazamias(1978) also argues that
as far as teachers' unions were concerned, they rather concentrated their criticism on the issue of
clearing of the sector of education of persons that were promoted by the previous dictatorial
government than on the content of the reform. Iliou(1984) suggests that the 1976 educational reform
surprised the political opponents of New Democracy, whereas it is basically accepted by all of them, in
the sense that they recognise its necessity and they simply point out that it delayed for many decades.
The deficiency of the other political powers,i.e of the centre right as well as the left to present an
alternative proposal for the structure and the content of education is obvious, despite the seeming
opposition that is expressed at the level of political confrontation. These political powers are in a
difficult position, because they see the progressive demands of the recent educational past to be
embraced by the party whose ideological predecessors opposed them. At this point Rokos(1982)
explains this policy arguing that the 1976 reform was imposed by internal (students and trade
unionists) as well as external(e.g lending from the World Bank) factors. As regards teachers' unions
they rather seem to follow the governmental suggestions than being ahead of them, with the sole
exception being their demand for university training courses for primary school teachers, as
Bouzakis(1993) mentions.
Kazamias(1978) argues that the 1976 reform was surpassed already from the time of its
establishment and that it was not based on academic debate and research, whereas OECD suggests that
in the policy statements of the 1976 reform
'one cannot[...] find[...] the scepticism or at best the uncertainties expressed in the international literature or policy documents of other countries regarding the economic or social powers of the education system'(OECD,1980,p.18).
In particular, Iliou(1984) argues that the educational reform changed neither the centralised character
of the Hellenic educational system nor the ideological base of education, the curricula, the textbooks,
the teaching methods and the training of teachers. Moreover, according to OECD, the political
alignments of the left expressed the fear that the reinforcement of the technical/vocational course
would create 'barriers to educational opportunity' because they believe that the 'intent to change the
flow of students after the compulsory stage so that a sizeable percentage would opt for the
technical/vocational course' would imply that it would become more difficult to proceed to general
48
post-compulsory education instead(OECD,1980,p.145).
Another interesting but rarely mentioned fact is that the 1976 educational reform is almost
exclusively concentrated on secondary education with the sole exception being the provisions for the
language of instruction. The establishment of demotiki as the language of instruction certainly affected
the performance standards of Hellenic education. The previously used katharevousa, a conservative
literary dialect which according to Mackridge
'represented an attempt to purge the modern language of words which it had taken from foreign languages and to reinstate much of the lexical and grammatical wealth of the ancient language which had lost during the two previous millennia'
differed very much from the spoken language, which is demotiki, and thus it had 'to be laboriously
learned'(Mackridge,1990,pp26,48). He concludes that the result of the use of katharevousa in
schooling was 'such a concentration on form that content had to be ignored'(Mackridge,ibid,p.49). It is
obvious that such an ignorance of the content cannot enhance the performance of the students. On the
contrary, it certainly made school learning more difficult and can be held responsible for the
reproduction of functional illiterates during the previous decades.
Apart from that change of the language of instruction, nothing else changes in primary education. As
Fragoudaki and Konduli point out
'there is a tradition in Greek society to call educational reform the changes that involve the lyceum7 and the universities. The educational misery of the country and the low educational level of its population are due to the educational stage where everything is determined for ever, the primary school. It cannot be a coincidence that we have not seen a reform in primary school since 1917'(Fragoudaki and Konduli,1982,p.115).
In other words, they imply that the absence of any reforms in primary education resulted in the
stagnation of its standards something that severely affected the quality of the whole Hellenic education
system. In general, we would agree with Dimaras'(1978) conclusion that despite the structural
amendments that were introduced by the 1976 reform,
'it has not changed the traditional conservative and authoritative character of the Greek educational system. It is very unlikely that it will help create a new type of mentality, a new approach to knowledge, a new culture, all of which have long been the rhetorical background of all liberal plans and appeals for reform'[cited by Pantelouris(1980,pp125-26)].
The reactions to the reform as well as to the general educational policy of New Democracy escalated
49
in the years after 1976 and up to the 1981 elections, after which the socialist party of PASOK came
into power. Political parties as well as teachers' unions are critical of the governmental policies as
regards the issue of the general democratization of the educational structures and the modernization of
the curricula and the teaching methods. However, six years after the 1976 reform Fragoudaki
mentioned that
'the problem is that at this moment there exists no other belief in Greek society than the one that was promoted by the 1964 reform and imposed by the 1976-1977 reform, neither among the political parties that have a say or an objection in educational policy nor among the unions of teachers'(Fragoudaki,1982,p.25).
In other words, it appears that the criticism of the opposition towards the educational policy of New
Democracy does not constitute a totally different perception of the relationship between education and
society, but it rather refers to partial changes in educational institutions. However, Bouzakis does argue
that whilst the 1976 reform was merely 'a regional proposal of bourgeois modernizations'in the reforms
that were implemented by the PASOK government in the years 1981-1985 a socialist change in
education takes place. He explains that this socialist philosophy is evident in the goals that are set in
the 1983-85 five-year programme 'in general for the carrying out of a socialist
reformation'(Bouzakis,1986,p.123).
According to the MNERA(1995) review the major reforms that took place in the years 1981-89
include:
-Law 1268/1982 'On the organization and function of AEI(university-level institutions)' which
introduced innovations such as the establishment of postgraduate studies and the expansion of student
participation in the decision-making of universities. As Bouzakis(1993) mentions this law also
abolished the pedagogical academies -which since 1933 provided training for primary and nursery
school teachers-and integrated primary and nursery school teacher education in universities with the
establishment of the pedagogical departments of primary education and of nursery school teachers
respectively.
Additionally the Centres of Higher and Vocational Education were replaced by
theTEI(Technological Educational Institutions)8 with the Law 1404/1983.
-Law 1566/1985 'On the Organisation of Primary and Secondary education' which attempted to
decentralise the decision-making process as well as the administration of education. Also with this
50
Law KEME was replaced by the Pedagogical Institute. This replacement as well as the previously
mentioned integration of primary school teacher education in universities contributed to the upgrading
of the content standards of Hellenic primary education in the way we analysed in the second chapter of
this part of the study. In the spirit of the previously mentioned decentralisation this law enhanced the
role of pupil societies with the establishment of pupil councils, in particular in the secondary schools.
More importance was given to teacher councils as well. For the first time this law also provided for the
involvement of parents' associations and of secondary school pupils in the school administration with
the provision for the participation of one parent in primary school Councils and Committees. School
Councils and Committees exist in every school and are responsible for the financial management of the
school and the raising of additional funds. Moreover, Law 1566/85 provided for the participation of a
parent representative in each of the regional Educational Committees which are based in cities and
towns throughout the country and according to Kassotakis 'offer advice to the city or town councils, on
school organisations, the allocation of grants to cover expenses of school units and the opening and
closure of schools, as well as the restoration of school buildings'(Kassotakis,1994,p.111). As regards
secondary education, in 1984 a new type of lyceum, the Unified Multivalent Lyceum was established,
which aimed at filling the gap between the general and technical post-compulsory secondary
education. The curricula and the textbooks of primary and secondary education were gradually
renewed.
It can be argued that the educational legislation of this period was very broad and left the
arrangement of more specific issues to further Presidential Decrees and in many cases very few
decrees were passed regarding the implementation of the provisions of the laws mentioned above. For
instance, according to the MNERA(1995) review this is the case for the Law 1566/1985
These two Laws (1268/1982 and 1566/1985) constitute the most important legislation passed in the
eighties regarding education. As far as the reaction to these reformative measures of the government is
concerned, New Democracy argued that the real educational reform occurred in 1976 with provisions
such as the establishment of demotiki as the language of instruction or the innovations in technical
education and argues that the internal changes that occurred aimed at the abolition of meritocracy and
the party control of education. At this point, we should point out that the MNERA(ibid) review also
mentions the fact that the reforms introduced by the socialist governments in the eighties involved
51
rather internal changes than changes in the structure of the system, like the ones introduced in the 1976
reform(e.g expansion of compulsory schooling, establishment of new types of schools in post-
compulsory secondary education etc). Thus, it could be suggested that the main concern of the reforms
in the eighties were the content standards of education. In particular, as regards compulsory education,
it could be suggested that the emphasis that was given to the content standards in the eighties was the
outcome of the new demands that compulsory education had to satisfy after the expansion of its
duration in the late seventies. The left which during the eighties is represented in parliament only by
KKE concentrates its criticism on the fact that pre-primary education was not widened enough and also
it is concerned with the influence of church in the state policies. As regards teacher unions, although
they have certain demands such as better pay and more appointments, they do not come into conflict
with governmental policies. The main reason of their satisfaction is that they saw their long-term
demand for integration of primary school teacher education into universities to be satisfied by the
governmental policies.
We are going to focus on the institution of Law 1566/1985 which is the main law-plan for education
brought by PASOK and has direct implications for the standards of primary education In the
introductory report of this law it is stated that it promotes the decentralisation which according to
Drakos is considered as the key structural change in PASOK's programme'((Drakos,1986,p.55). It is
also mentioned that it 'safeguards the participation of teachers, parents, pupils and of social and
academic authorities' as well as that 'it changes not only the external features of the system, but mainly
its internal ones, with the establishment of authorities, institutes and processes' and that 'it achieves the
democratization of education, which includes participation, social control and democratical
programming'[Teaching Tribune,1985(961),pp.3-5].
During the seven-month period that elapsed between the presentation of the law-plan and its
passing, a dialogue took place between the Ministry of Education and the educational people. The
initial reaction of the political parties was rather mild. On the one hand, the New Democracy Party
considered it as an acceptance and a supplement of its own educational reform of 1976, whereas KKE,
as it is mentioned in Radical(Rizospastis)9 (23/3/84), argued that 'as a whole it is not a backward
movement but it also 'does not move towards a real change, and therefore, the attempt of
modernization is not accompanied by measures of democratization.'[cited by Noutsos(1986,p.76)].
52
However, in Parliament both parties voted against the law-plan.
In general terms, teacher unions accepted the law-plan and expressed their support to the
government with statements such as that 'it will open the road to an education in the service of the
people and the country'[Teaching Tribune,1985(961),p.1].
It could be suggested that this law in general terms constitutes a positive step and that its most
important quality is that it provided for the participation of parents in education, although it is true that
these provisions did not give the parents an important role and that in the future they were neglected. It
also moved towards a decentralisation of the decision making process in educational policy, but as we
mentioned above most of its provisions regarding the participation of parents, teachers and pupils in
the decision making process were finally neglected and the dominance of the MNERA was not
challenged. Thus, we would agree with Kassotakis who argues that even after the reforms Hellenic
education 'still maintains its traditional, hierarchical bureaucratic structure, which frustrates any efforts
at substantial educational change'(Kassotakis,1994,p.110).
According to the MNERA(1995) review the main concern for policy planners in the nineties is the
quality of the provided education at all levels. Particular problems that have to be faced included the
overloaded primary and secondary school curriculum which according to Kontogiannopoulou-
Polydorides et al still focus 'on transmitting and acquiring fixed knowledge and national cultural
heritage' instead of cultivating cultural thought, the lack of adequate resources, the growing number of
teachers that wait to be appointed, but the most controversial issues that emerged in the ninties
involved higher education and in particular the attempt of the neo-conservative policies implemented
by New Democracy, which reassumed power in 1990, to establish private higher
education(Kontogiannopoulou-Polydorides et al,1994,p.2516). According to Kassotakis and
Lambrakis-Paganos(1993), as regards primary and secondary education the New Democracy
government did not change the legislative framework but it only attempted a few modifications in the
spirit of its conservative policy.
53
CONCLUSIONS
From the general discussion about the problems in Hellenic primary education certain problems
were found to exist in all the categories of standards that we examined. At this point, as regards our
way of analysis, it should be emphasized that as Bottani and Tuijnman mention 'no single conceptual
scheme can usefully include all important aspects of an education system, because education is
multifaceted and multidimensional' and thus 'an accepted framework for organizing the education
indicators and depicting their complex relationships does not exist'(Bottani and Tuijnman,1994,p.51).
The forming of the interpreting framework was based on the critical presentation of the basic
arguments of the contemporary theoretical approaches to educational policy with an attempt to form a
dialogue between these approaches. Our interpreting framework sees education as a public function
that refers to the public interest and within the contemporary state it is seen as a policy with a
redistributing character which can serve the principles of social justice. At the same time, several
conflicting interests intervene and attempt to influence the state in the making of educational policy.
Consequently, educational reform is determined by an interest negotiation between groups within as
well as out of the state.
It is hoped that the understanding of the relationship among education, the state and society that is
discussed in the first part of this study combined with the analysis of educational policies in relation to
the standards of education constitutes an appropriate theoretical framework for the analysis of
educational policy in Greece. The forming of groups of educational standards that was developed in
the presentation of our methodology and put into practice in the second part of the study helps our
analysis to move beyond a descriptive comparison between the aims and the results of the
implemented policies and contributes to the understanding and criticism of educational policies and
reforms. It also facilitates the identification of the ideological and political conflicts and of the social
interests that intervene in the policy making process and promote, obstruct or readjust the educational
policy of the state.
In our analysis we found the existence of great social inequalities in Hellenic primary education and
the absence of adequate compensating provisions for these inequalities which require a reinforcement
54
and expansion of public educational provisions. Problems are also found to exist as regards the content
standards of Hellenic primary education as it appears from the content of the primary curriculum and
the textbooks, the inadequate initial and in-service education of primary school teachers and the
essential absence of educational research. Finally problems appear to exist regarding student dropout,
functional illiteracy and the financing of education.
In general terms, it is concluded that the preceding analysis of educational policy on Hellenic
primary education confirmed the absence of consensus among the groups involved in the making of
educational policy as regards the facing of problems and deficiencies concerning the opportunity to
learn, the content and the performance standards. Comparatively, the greater degree of consensus as
regards the views about the policies that should be implemented in the several standard areas of
primary education that are mentioned above is found to exist in the area of the performance standards.
For instance, the policies of the extension of compulsory education from six to nine years were widely
accepted. A greater differentiation of the policies is observed in issues related to the opportunity to
learn and to the content standards.
It could be suggested that the political parties play an important role, because they intervene in the
negotiation between the state and the teachers' unions, which according to Archer's(1985) model takes
the form of internal initiation. In our analysis we found that most political parties adopted demands put
by teachers' unions with the aim to increase their influence on these unions at the expense of the other
political parties. The intense intervention of the political parties in the above interest negotiation is
indicative of the direct relationship of the Hellenic educational system with the political system, which
is mentioned by Palios(1986) as one of its most distinct features. It could be suggested that another
distinct feature of the Hellenic educational policy making is its ultracentralised character and the
dominant role of the Ministry of National Education and Religious Affairs which, as Starida mentions,
'has been the centre of decision making leaving all other groups outside this
process'(Starida,1988,p.102).
This study attempted a general analysis of educational policy in relation to the standards of
education. It is doubtless that more specific studies in each area of standards need to be done and
possibly in other areas. These studies could reveal other interesting aspects of the negotiation and
distribution of educational authority and thus they would contribute to a deeper understanding of the
55
educational policy making and implementation process.
56
NOTES
1.Publication of the Primary school teacher Federation of Greece(DOE).
2.This is a programme of occupation of children within the school and after the end of the school
programme(in order to cover the working hours of parents) with activities such as art education, sport,
preparation for the subjects of the next day.
3.The modern Greek language acquired two forms. One is demotiki, which is the language of common
speech and the other is katharevousa, a conservative literary dialect. The question of whether demotiki
or katharevousa should be used for instruction in schools was a major problem for policy makers of
Hellenic education and constituted the so called language issue which in the past was rather a general
social problem than an education specific one that according to Holmes 'has led to rioting in the streets
of Athens to bloodhood and even death'(Holmes,1983,p.346). Holmes(ibid) gives a brief and
comprehensive account of the language issue in his report on Greece. A more detailed descritption of
the Greek language question is given by Mackridge(1990).
4.Rural schools where a teacher may teach to a class composed by students from more than one grade.
5.Equivalent to the British Bill.
6 A detailed presentation of the contemporary political scene in Greece can be found in
Clogg,R.(1987) Parties and elections in Greece. The search for legitimacy. London:C.Hurst&Co.
7.The post-compulsory three-year school.
8..These could be compared with the former English polytechnics.
9.Official newspaper of KKE.
57
APPENDIX The Constitution of Greece Article 16
1. Art and science, research and teaching shall be free and their development and promotion shall be an
obligation of the State. Academic freedom and freedom of teaching shall not exempt anyone from his
duty of allegiance to the Constitution
.
2. Education constitutes a basic mission for the State and shall aim at the moral, intellectual,
professional and physical training of Greeks, the development of national and religious consciousness
and at their formation as free and responsible citizens.
3. The number of years of compulsory education shall be no less than nine.
4. All Greeks are entitled to free education on all levels at State educational institutions. The State shall
provide financial assistance to those who distinguish themselves, as well as to students in need of
assistance or special protection, in accordance with their abilities.
5. Education at university level shall be provided exclusively by institutions which are fully self-
governed public law legal persons. These institutions shall operate under the supervision of the State
and are entitled to financial assistance from it; they shall operate on the basis of statutorily enacted by-
laws. Merging or splitting
of university level institutions may take place notwithstanding any contrary provisions, as a law shall
provide.
A special law shall define all matters pertaining to student associations and the participation of
students therein.
58
6. Professors of university level institutions shall be public functionaries. The remaining teaching
personnel likewise perform a public function, under the conditions specified by law. The statutes of
respective institutions shall define matters relating to the status of all the above.
Professors of university level institutions shall not be dismissed prior to the lawful termination of their
term of service, except in the cases of the substantive conditions provided by article 88 paragraph 4
and following a decision by a council constituted in its majority of highest judicial functionaries, as
specified by law.
The retirement age of professors of university level institutions shall be determined by law; until such
law is issued, professors on active service shall retire ipso jure at the end of the academic year at which
they have reached the age of sixty-seven.
7. Professional and any other form of special education shall be provided by the State, through schools
of a higher level and for a time period not exceeding three years, as specifically provided by law which
also defines the professional rights of the graduates of such schools.
8. The conditions and terms for granting a license for the establishment and operation of schools not
owned by the State, the supervision of such and the professional status of teaching personnel therein
shall be specified by law.
The establishment of university level institutions by private persons is prohibited.
9. Athletics shall be under the protection and the ultimate supervision of the State.
10. The State shall make grants to and shall control all types of athletic associations, as specified by
law. The use of grants in accordance with the purpose of the associations receiving them shall also be
specified by law.
59
REFERENCES
-Adler,M., Petch,A., Tweedie,J.(1989) Parental Choice and Educational Policy. Edinburgh:Edinburgh
University Press.
-Archer,M.S.(1985) Educational politics:a model for their analysis. In I.McNay and J.Ozga(eds)Policy
Making in Education. Oxford:Pergamon Press.
-Baldridge,J.V.(1989) The micropolitics of schools. In T.Bush(ed) Managing education:theory and
practice.Milton Keynes:Open University Press.
-Ball,ST.J.(1990) Politics and Policy Making in Education. London:RKP.
-Bottani,N. and Tuijman,A.(1994) The Design of Indicator Systems. In A.C. Tuijman and T.N.
Postlethwaite(eds) Monitoring the Standards of Education. Oxford:Pergamon.
-Bouzakis,J.(1986) Modern Hellenic Education(1821-1985) Athens:Gutenberg(in Greek)
-(1993) Teacher training in Greece. European Education.13,23-31.
-(1994)In-service education of teachers in the nineties-a critical interpreting approach of the
conservative turn. In K.Anthopoulos, V.Daglis, J.Bouzakis, C.L. Tsolakis. Initial and In-service
Education of Teachers. Thessaloniki:Art of Text(in Greek).
-Chitty,C.(1989) Towards a New Education System:The Victory of the New Right? London:The
Falmer P:ress.
-Dale,,R.(1989) The State and Education Policy. London:Open University Press.
-Dervisis,S.(1985) History of the Modern Hellenic Education and Contemporary Educational System.
Thessaloniki.(in Greek).
-Dimaras,A.(1987) The Reform that never happened. Athens:Hermes(in Greek).
-DOE(1984) The New Curricula and textbooks for students and teachers. Athens:Scientific Tribune.
-Drakos,G.(1986) The Socialist Economic Policy in Greece. A Critique. In Z.Tzannatos(ed) Socialism
in Greece. The First Four Years. Aldershot:Gower.
-Duncan,G.(1982) Greece smartly changes pace and direction. Times Educational Supplement.9
April,12.
-ESYE(National Statisitcal Service of Greece)(1986) Statistics of Education 1980/81. Athens:ESYE(in
60
Greek).
-(1995) Statistics of Education 1985/86. Athens:ESYE.(in Greek)
-Farakos,G.(1984) Introductory Speech In Section of Education of Cental Committiee of KKE. KKE
for Primary and Secondary Education. Athens: Contemporary Age(Synchroni Epochi)(in Greek).
-Fragoudaki,A.(1982) Educational Reform Processes. Contemporary Education.6,25-26(in Greek)
-(1985) Sociology of Education. Athens:Papazisis(in Greek).
-(1987) Language and Ideology.Athens:Ulysses.(in Greek)
-Fragoudaki,A. and Konduli,M.(1982) The 'Educational Reform' as political ideology:The view of the
political parties for education.Politics.3,104-117.(in Greek)
-Friedman,M.(1962) Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
-Free Press(Eleftheros Typos) newspaper.(1996) 4 July(in Greek)
-George,V. and Wilding,P.(1984) The impact of social policy. London:RKP.
-Gerou,T.(1981). Educational Policy(1975-1981).Athens(in Greek)
-(1985) Deep Cuts in Education.Athens:Gutenberg.(in Greek).
-Gonzalez,E.J. and Beaton,A.E.(1994) The Determination of Cut Scores for Standards. In
A.C.Tuijnman and T.N Postlethwaite(eds) Monitoring the Standards of Education. Oxford:Pergamon.
-Hargreaves,A.(1985) The Politics of Administrative Convenience:the case of middle schools. In
I.McNay and J.Ozga(eds) Policy-Making in Education. Oxford:Pergamon
-Holmes,B.(1983)(ed) Greece In J.Cameron,R.Cowan,B.Holmes, P.Hurst,M.McLean(eds)
International Handbook of Educational Systmes. Volume 1. Europe and Canada. Chichester:John
Wiley & Sons.
-Husen,T. and Tuijnman,A.(1994) Monitoring Standards in Education:Why and how it Came About.
In A.C. Tuijnman and T.N.Postlethwaite(eds). Monitoring the Standards of Education.
Oxford:Pergamon.
-Iliou.M(1984) Educational and Social Dynamic. Athens:Route(Poria) (in Greek)
-Jansen,M.(1989) Literacy. In M.Galton and A.Blyth(eds) Handbook of Primary Education in Europe.
London:David Fulton.
-Johnson,D(1990) Parental Choice in Education. London:Unwin Hyman.
-Kassotakis,M.(1994) Greece. In C. Brook and W. Tulasiewicz(eds), Education in a Single Europe.
61
London:Routledge.
-Kassotakis,M. and Lambrakis-Paganos,A.(1993) Greek Education and its Legislative Framework. In
W.Tulasiewicz and G.Strowbridge(eds) Education and the Law. London:Routledge.
-Kazamias,A..M(1978) The politics of Educational Reform in Greece:Law 309/1976. Comparative
Education Review.22(1),21-45.
-Kogan,M(1975) Educational Policy-Making. A study of interest groups and Parliament.
London:Allen and Unwin.
-(1985) Education policy and Values. In I.McNay and J.Ozga(eds) Policy-Making in Education.
Oxford:Pergamon.
-Kontogiannopoulos,B.(1991) Education. Modernization under Suspension. Athens:Gutenberg.(in
Greek).
-Kontogiannopoulou-Polydorides,,G. Mylonas,T., Solomon,J., Vergidis,D(1994) Greece:System of
Education. In T.Husen and N.Posltethwaite(eds) International Encyclopedia of Education. Second
edition. Volume 5 Oxford:Pergamon.
-Lane,J.E(1993) The public sector. Contents,Models and Approaches. London:SAGE.
-Law 186/1975 On the Organization of the Centre for Educational Studies and In-Service
Training(KEME).Governmental Gazette.214(in Greek)
-Law 309/1976 On the Organization and Administration of General Education. Governmental
Gazzete.100)
-Law 576/1977 On the Organization and Administration of Secondary and Higher Vocational and
Tecnical Education. Governmental Gazette,102.
-Mackridge,P.(1990) Katharevousa(c1800-1974). An Obituary for an Official Language. In M.Safaris
and M.Eve(eds) Background to contemporary Greece. Volume 1. London:The Merlin.
-Mantos,D.(1982) A Study of the Greek education system. M.A dissertation. Lancaster: Lancaster
University.
-Markopoulos,A.(1986) Politics and Education: the Democratization of the Greek Education System.
PhD Thesis. London:Institute of Education. University of London.
-Maurogiorgos,G.(1990) The restoration of the numerical marking system and examinations in
Primary School. Contemporary Education.54,15-21(in Greek).
62
-MNERA(YPEPTH)(1975) Report of the Committee for Education. Athens:OEDB(in Greek).
-(1983) Law 1268/1982 on the Organization and Function of AEI. Athens:OEDB(in Greek).
-(1985) Law 1566/1985 on the Organization of primary and secondary education. Athens:OEDB(in
Greek).
-(1995) Greece. Educational policy review background to OECD on education. Athens:OEDB(in
Greek).
-New Democracy(1989) Programme for Education. Athens:ND(in Greek).
-Noutsos,C.(1986) Ideology and Educational Policy. Athens:Foundation(Themelio) (in Greek).
-Ntountoulakis,K.(1989) The nine-year 'compulsory' education in the prefecture of Chania. In DOE-
POED Unified nine-year Compulsory Education. Athens:Scientific Tribune of the Teacher(in Greek).
-OECD(1980) Educational Policy and Planning Educational Reform Policies in Greece.Paris:OECD.
-(1995) OECD Educational policy review of Greece. Paris:OECD.
-Palios,Z.(1984) Reproduction of regional and class inequalities through education in Greece. MEd
dissertation. Cardiff:University College.
-(1986) The development of education within the political, economic and social structures of Greece.
PhD Thesis. Wales:University of Wales.
-Pantelouris,M(1980) Greece an introduction. Glasgow:Blueavre Books.
-Papakonstantionou,P.(1986) From the Pedagogical Ideology to Scientific Pedagogy: The content of
the training of the Greek teacher. In T.Gotovos, G.Maurogiorgos,P.Papakonstantinou Critical
Pedagogy and Educational Practice. Athens:Contemporary Education.(in Greek).
-(1990) Pedagogical Departments and Social Control.Contemporary Education.54,39-45.(in Greek).
-PASOK(1981) Declaration of Governmental Policy. Athens:Office of Publications, PASOK.(in
Greek).
-Pesmazoglou,S.(1987) Education and Development in Greece(1948-1985).
Athens:Foundation(Themelio)(in Greek).
-Postlethwaite,T.N(1994) Monitoring and Evaluation in Different Education Systems. In A.C
Tuijnman and T.N Postlethwaite. Monitoring the Standards of Education. Oxford:Pergamon.
-Rokos,D.(1982) Change in education. Education for change. Thessaloniki:Observer.(in Greek).
-Rougeri,N(1996) Massive 'truancy' from school. The Tribune newspaper,9 April,67.(in Greek).
63
64
-Salter,B and Tapper,T.(1981) Education Politics and the State. The theory and practice of educational
change.London:McIntyre.
-Starida,A(1988) Educational Perspectives of Greece's Accesion to the EEC. M.A Dissertation.
London:Institute of Education. University of London.
-Teaching Tribune Issues 780(1975), 854(1979), 901(1981), 961(1985), 966(1985), 1015(1987)(in
Greek).
-Terzis,N.(1988) Educational Policy and Educational Reform:Programme and reality-Facts abd
Persons. Thessaloniki:Kuriakidis(in Greek).
-The Constitution of Greece(1975).Athens(in Greek).
-Vergidis,D and Papakostopoulos,P.(1984) Illiteracy in Greece. Sellf education.(Automorphosi)3-4,16-
21.(in Greek).
Recommended