Electrochemical Hydrogen Compressor · 2014. 6. 17. · Electrochemical Hydrogen Compressor Ludwig...

Electrochemical Hydrogen Compressor

Ludwig Lipp FuelCell Energy, Inc.

June 17, 2014 Project ID #PD048

This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information

2

• Project start date: 7/15/10 • Project end date: 10/14/14

• Barriers addressed for gaseous hydrogen compression: – More reliable – Lower-cost – Higher efficiency

• Total Funding Spent: $1,517,000*

• Total DOE Project Value: $1,993,642

Timeline

Budget

Barriers

• Collaborations: Sustainable Innovations, LLC

• Project lead: FuelCell Energy

Partners

Overview

*as of 3/31/2014

3

Impact of EHC: • Increases reliability/availability over current

mechanical compressors

• Ensures “no possibility of lubricant contamination” (No moving parts) Fuel Cell Quality H2

• Increases Compression Efficiency to 95% (DOE 2015 Target)

• Potentially reduces cost of H2 delivery to <$1/gge (DOE Long Term Target)

Relevance

4

• Use high-pressure electrolyzer experience for mechanically robust cell design

• Higher current density operation to minimize capital and operating costs

• Improved flow field design to increase H2 recovery efficiency

• Simple system: Reduce capital cost by increasing cell size and reducing number of parts

Approach

5

Approach

ITEM APPROACH Increase Pressure, Life, Efficiency -Cell & Stack Design Enhancements

-MEA Improvements -Multi-Stage Operation -Very High Single Stage Compression

Lower System Cost -Cell & Stack Design Enhancements -Increase Current Density -Increased Durability/Life -Increase Single-Stage Pressure Capability -Design for Mfg & Assembly -Lower Labor Rates -Lower Cost Materials of Construction -Lower Part Count -Leverage Economies of Scale -Increase Cell Active Area

Design Development & Scale-Up

6

Principle of Electrochemical Hydrogen Compressor

Cathode+ -

Anode

e-

e-

e-

e-

Power Supply

Solid ElectrolyteProton Exchange Membrane

+ +

e-e-

e-

Hydrogen

+++

+

+ +

FFFFFF

SO3HSO3H

C

F

C

O

C

F

C

F

C

O

C

F

Rf Rf +H

H

HH

e-

e-

HH

Hydrogen

HH

HH

Cathode+ -

Anode

e-

e-

e-

e-

Power Supply

Solid ElectrolyteProton Exchange Membrane

+ +

e-e-

e-

Hydrogen

+++

+

+ +

FFFFFF

SO3HSO3H

C

F

C

O

C

F

C

F

C

O

C

F

Rf Rf +H

H

HH

e-

e-

HH

Hydrogen

HH

HH

Cathode+ -

Anode

e-

e-

e-

e-

Power Supply

Solid ElectrolyteProton Exchange Membrane

Solid ElectrolyteProton Exchange Membrane

++ ++

e-e-

e-

Hydrogen

++++++

++

++ ++

FFFFFF

SO3HSO3H

C

F

C

O

C

F

C

F

C

O

C

F

RfRf RfRf ++H

HHH

HH

HH

HHHH

e-

e-

HH

HHHH

Hydrogen

HH

HHHH

HH

HHHH

H H H

H H H

H

H H H H

H H

H H H

H

Hydrogen

Hydrogen

Hydrogen

Compressed

• Simple operating principle with no moving parts – Solid State !

• Use of hydrogen electrode for high compression efficiency

EHC does not follow

P V = n R T

Rather Nernst Eqn:

=

1

2theor P

PnFRTV ln

7

EHC Pressure Capability

Met DOE 2015 pressure target for forecourt compressors

Improvements made: • Seals with higher pressure capability

• Improved MEA support

DOE Target

8

Reduction in the Energy Consumption of EHC

Improvements made: • Lower cell resistance

• Lower applied voltage

Improved cell design and materials for 3,000 psi

0

5

10

15

20

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000

Spec

ific

Ener

gy C

onsu

mpt

ion,

(kW

h/kg

-H2)

Hydrogen Product Pressure, (psi)

EHC-i

EHC-ii

EHC-iii

EHC-iv

EHC-v

EHC-vi

Adiabatic w/60% Eff

3-Stage Mechanical

Nernst Voltage

} 81 c

m2

cells

185 cm2 cell

9

EHC Durability

Improvements made: • Membrane with higher proton conductivity • Matching electrodes • Lower cell resistance

10,000 hr operation at ~95% H2 recovery

>8,500 hrs at elevated current density (≥750 mA/cm2) in 185 cm2 cell

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

2007 2008 2009 11/12 12/13 13/14

Ope

ratin

g Li

fe, (

hour

s)

Year

EHC Operation Time, (hours)

Still

Run

ning

10

EHC Cost Reduction Reduction in Parts per EHC Cell

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Developing Cell Designs

Original 81 cm2 Baseline

81 cm2 Design Mod H

81 cm2 Design Mod D

81 cm2 Design Mod H+D

81 cm2 Design Mod J/K

81 cm2 Design Mod J/K+D

81 cm2 Design Mod J/K+D+H

-

Advanced 185 cm2 Baseline

185 cm2 Design Mod #1

185 cm2 Design Mod #2

185 cm2 Design Mod #381 CM2 CELLS 185 CM2 CELLS

Original 81 cm

2Baseline Design

In Development

% o

f Orig

inal

Per

-Cel

l Par

t Cou

nt

Advanced 185 cm2

Baseline Design

Completed

Completed

In Development

On Hold

On Hold

On Hold

Original 81 cm2

Baseline Design

Reduced part count by 75% of original design

11

Opportunities for Cost Reduction Stack Cost/H2 Compression Capacity - $/kg-H2/day

Cost reduced by 60% in current program

Improvements : • Higher current density operation • Cell area scale-up • Stack scale-up • Reduction in # of cell parts • Lower cost cell and stack materials • Lower cost fabrication

Prog

ress

12

EHC Stack Development

Cumulatively >8,000 hr operating experience

† At Sustainable Innovations

3-Cell Stack #1

3-Cell Stack #2

3-Cell Stack #3

5-Cell Stack

10-Cell Stack

8-Cell Stack

185 cm2

Pressure, (psig) 4,550 Up to

1,000 2-3,000 Up to 3,000

Up to 3,050 3,000

CurrentDensity,

(mA/cm²)≤500 Up to

2,200 ≤500 ≤450 ≤500 ≤720

Capacity, (lbs/day) 0.2 Up to 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.6 2.0

Operation, (hours) 150 ~100 >2,000† 1,800 ~400 >3,800

13

Subscale Stack Durability

Met program target of 1,000 hr stable operation in EHC stack

0

200

400

600

800

1000

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000

Cell

Volta

ge, (

mV)

Runtime, (hours)

5-Cell EHC Stack Life ChartCurrent Density 400mA/cm²; Feed Pressure 30psig; Product Pressure 1000psig

Cell 1Cell 2Cell 3Cell 4Cell 5

14

Larger Area EHC Stack

Met program target of 2 lb/day hydrogen at 3,000 psi

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Cell

Volta

ge, (

mV)

Cell no.

EHC 8-Cell Stack: Cell VoltagesFeed pressure 30psig; Product pressure 3,000psig; 300mA/cm²

Improved cell to cell performance variation by ~50%

Increasing Hydrogen Capacity by 7x

DC Load, (Amps) 133

Average Cell Voltage, (Volts) 0.373

Flux Rate, (SLPM H2) 7.6

Power, (Watts) 397

Production Rate, (lb H2/day) 2

15

Prime

• FuelCell Energy, Inc. (Industry): – System development and application engineering

– Membrane and electrode design and fabrication

Subcontractor

• Sustainable Innovations, LLC (Small Business): – Cell and stack design and fabrication

– Scale-up design and fabrication

– EHC stack cost reduction and estimates

Collaborations

16

• Continue endurance tests of 10,000 hr and 8,500 hr cells

• Continue testing short stack

• Build and test taller EHC stack

• Complete test facility for larger capacity EHC stacks

• Demonstrate 1,000 hr operation at 2 lb/day H2 capacity

compressing to 3,000 psi

Proposed Future Work

17

Scale-Up Plan to Reach 8 lb/day

5 - Cell 81 cm2 Active Area 400 mA/cm2

0.3 lb/day

Single Cell 185 cm2 Active Area 500 - 1500 mA/cm2

Up to 0.5 lb/day

8 - Cell 185 cm2 Active Area 500 – 1000 mA/cm2

2 - 3 lb/day

25 - Cell 185 cm2 Active Area 500 – 1000 mA/cm2

Up to 8 lb/day

Activity Covered Under Current Funding

Activity Not Covered Under Current Funding

18

Achievements in EHC Technology Development

Parameter Program Goals Current Status DOE Goals Hydrogen Product Pressure

Up to 3,000 psi building block, 6-12 kpsi

12,800 psi single stage 6,000 psi 2-stage

12,700 psi

Hydrogen Inlet Press. 5 - 300 psi 0 – 2,000 psi 300 psi

Compression Ratio Up to 300:1 300:1 43:1

Hydrogen Recovery Efficiency

90 - 95% >98% 99.5%

Hydrogen Flux 500 -1,000 mA/cm2 ≥750 mA/cm2 for >8,500 hrs (185 cm2 cell)

-

Hydrogen Capacity 2-4 lb/day at 3,000 psi 2 lb/day Up to 1000 kg/day

Endurance Capability 1,000 hrs at 3,000 psi >10,000 hrs at 3,000 psi >5 years

Compression Efficiency

<10 kWh/kg at 3,000 psi 3-12 kWh/kg from <30 to 3,000 psi

6.2 kWh/kg from 300 to 12,500 psi

19

Project Summary Relevance: Provide highly efficient, reliable and cost-effective hydrogen

compression (up to 6,000/12,000 psi)

Approach: Develop electrochemical compressor – solid state device

Technical Accomplishments:

- Reduced capital cost by >60% by increasing current density, increasing cell active area and by design improvements (reduced cell part count)

- Operated >8,500 hrs in 185 cm2 cell at ≥750 mA/cm2 at high H2 recovery (≥ 95%)

- Demonstrated 2 lb/day capacity at 3,000 psi in 185 cm2 stack

Collaborations: Active partnership with industry (Sustainable Innovations) on materials, design and fabrication

Proposed Future Work: Scale-up to taller stack to further increase throughput and lower the cost

20

• FCE: Pinakin Patel, Ray Kopp, Jonathan Malwitz,

Paul Pinard

• Sustainable Innovations, LLC: Trent Molter and team

• DOE: Erika Sutherland, Dave Peterson, Sara Dillich,

Monterey Gardiner

Acknowledgement