Engr. Esperanza A. Sajul EIAMD, CO

Engr. Esperanza A. SajulEIAMD, CO

Overview of the Current Mmt policies

MMT System Review & Assessment

Streamlined processing of ECC Strengthened compliance monitoring

SEPMES Model of Multipartite Monitoring and Audit System proposed (thru Worldbank assisted project)

- Technical guidelines and administrative procedures

- Shared accountability and defined roles of stakeholders

- Supports self-regulation and decentralization

MMT System Review & Assessment

Alternatives to MMT considered, e.g., audit, insurance, along with the criterion of “social acceptability” in the ECC applications

Clustering of MMTs- Geopolitical Area- Industry Sector- Ecosystem or Landscape

MONITORING & EVALUATION SYSTEM BEFORE

EMBMONITORING

LOCAL STAKEHOLDERS

MONITORING

PROPONENTSELF-MONITORING

IMPACTS

COMPLAINTS

MULTIPARTITEMONITORING

TEAM

EMBREVIEW

PROPONENT

ENHANCED MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

EMP

CMR

MMTTEAM VALIDATION

CMVR

MOO

Comparison of the Old System and key features of the M & E Systems Enhancements

Multi-stakeholder Participation in General

BEFORE

ENHANCEMENTSStandardization through EMoP/EMP-

based Manual of Operations (MOO) and Code of Ethics

RATIONALE

Rationalized stakeholder participation based on individual capacities of each stakeholder group anchored on EMoP

BEFORE MMT structure/organization is flexible based on own interpretation of DAO

Comparison of the Old System and key features of the M & E Systems Enhancements

Reporting

BEFORE1) Limited guidelines for proponent and

MMT quarterly reporting; 2) Limited to ECC compliance monitoring;

ENHANCEMENTS

1) Technical and administrative guidelines for semi- annual CMR by proponent, and CMR-based MMT CMVR and conflict /complaints management by MMT

2) Monitoring forms developed : CMR, CMVR, CER

RATIONALEPro-formas ease MMT, proponent and EMB

reporting & standardizes monitoring info for better data banking

Comparison of the Old System and key features of the M & E Systems Enhancements

Systems Audit

BEFORENo explicit requirement or procedures for audit

ENHANCEMENTSSystems audit as well as MMT performance audit guidelines and procedures developed

RATIONALE For continuous Systems improvement

Prescribed ECC Format – Focus of Compliance Monitoring

Scope of project or undertaking

Conditions conformed by the proponent to implement mitigating measures for potentially negative impacts and enhancement measures for potentially positive impacts

Recommendations to concerned permitting, deciding and monitoring entities

Underlying purpose of the Environmental Monitoring and Evaluation System

Evaluate effectiveness of environmental measures on prevention or mitigation of actual project impacts vis a vis the predicted impacts used as basis for the EMP design; and

continual updating of the EMP for

sustained responsiveness to mitigate

environmental impacts.

CURRENT MMT POLICIES

as per as per Department Administrative Order Department Administrative Order

No. 30-2003 No. 30-2003 and theand the

Revised Procedural Manual 2007Revised Procedural Manual 2007

CURRENT MMT POLICIESMONITORING/VALIDATION MONITORING/VALIDATION

Activities can be done by:Activities can be done by:

•Monitoring (Self) by the Proponent

•Monitoring by the DENR/EMB

•Monitoring by the MMT /3rd party Auditors

CURRENT MMT POLICIES

Monitoring by the MMT►Operationalization of the MMT

Core membership/responsibilities► MMT have the primary responsibility of validating the Proponent’s environmental performance.

• Validate proponents compliance with stipulations in the ECC• Validate proponents conduct of self monitoring • Act on complaints (validate & provide

recommendations)►MMT Code of Ethics

► Formation of the MMT

CURRENT MMT POLICIES

Reporting by the MMT

►using the Compliance Monitoring and Validation Report (CMVR) (Annex 3-2 of the rev. Procedural Manual)

►CMVR should be duly signed by the MMT

►Frequency of Monitoring Activities Quarterly - Semi-annual

►Frequency of Submission Semi-annual

CURRENT MMT POLICIES

MMT Manual of Operations (MOO)

Prescribe an outline which shall guide the MMT in the planning of its activities, operationalization of its function and review of its performance

Integration or Clustering of MMTs

ROs are enjoined to cluster, merge or integrate MMTs based on sectoral (e.g. project type), spatial considerations (e.g. area, municipal or provincial level) as may be appropriate

CURRENT MMT POLICIES

Thank you