View
213
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
7/28/2019 Exegesis of Mark 10 13-16
1/13
Gordon Conwell Theological Seminary
NT502 New Testament Interpretation
Dr. Roy C. Ciampa
Exegesis on Mark 10:13-16
John Q. Dao
Box 76-A
May 3, 2010
7/28/2019 Exegesis of Mark 10 13-16
2/13
Dao 1
I. Introduction
Boundaries and coherence of the text. Mark 10:13-16 occurs between a passage where
Jesus is speaking about divorce and marriage and a scene in which Jesus meets a rich young
man. However, on closer inspection, it is not unreasonable to conclude that it belongs here. A
few common themes and motifs run throughout Mark 9:14 through Mark 10:29. Motifs of
children occurs six times in this section (Mark 9:14-32, 36-37, 42, Mark 10:13-16, 24, 29, and
the theme of servitude is threaded throughout (Mark 9:35, 41, 10:21), building on the major
theme of discipleship throughout Mark1. Thus, this is the context Mark 10:13-16 finds itself in.
It is evident that these four versus are the boundaries of this pericope because of the shift in
the authors focus on the characters interacting with Jesus. New characters are introduced in
Mark 10:13 (an unnamed people who were bringing children) and again the characters change
in Mark 10:17 (introduction of a man falling to his knees before Jesus) signaling the end of one
scene and the beginning of another.
Mark was written to be read aloud in churches in total or at least in large chunks2, so in light
of this (and with all good exegesis), exegesis of Mark 10:13-16 must take into account the larger
context of where its placed. If early hearers of Mark did not hear it in small sections (like we
are accustomed), then they would have noticed the themes and emphases more clearly.
Although this vignette about Jesus and the little children has clear delineated boundaries as a
1 Edwards, James R. The Gospel According to Mark (The Pillar New Testament Commentary). Grand Rapids:
Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2002. suggests these themes: Discipleship, Faith, Insiders and Outsiders,
Gentiles, Command to Silence, and Journey.
2 Hooker, Morna D. The Gospel According to Saint Mark (Black's New Testament Commentaries). Ed. Henry
Chadwick. London: A&C Black (Publishers) Limited, 1991. 16 offers a more in depth discussion on the
composition of Mark.
7/28/2019 Exegesis of Mark 10 13-16
3/13
Dao 2
single scene, it needs to be interpreted in the context of the place where it is set in the whole of
Marks gospel.
The structure of vv. 13-16 assumes a very narrative backbone, describing an event that
happened in the ministry of Jesus. Verse 13 introduces the conflict which leads to Jesus
response in verses 14 and 15 and ultimately the resolution in verse 16. Classically, this story
has been used as a sentimental favorite to how much Jesus loves the children; however its not
primarily about the children. The bulk of the text is focused around Jesus response, indicating
Marks sole interest in what Jesus has to say. Its appropriately placed after the passage on
divorce by Mark because marriage and children are commonly linked. In addition, it expounds
some of the key ideas being developed in the Second half of Mark (Jesus ministry and journey
to Jerusalem).3
The disciples are receiving their final instructions and teachings before Jesus
must die on the cross in Jerusalem.
Personal Translation of Mark 10:13-16
And they were trying4
to bring to him children in order that he might touch them56
. But the
disciples rebuked them7. After seeing (this)
8, Jesus became indignant and
9said to them, Permit
3France, R.T. The Gospel of Mark (The New International Greek Testament Commentary). Grand Rapids: Wm. B.
Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2002. 11 describes Mark as a 3 act drama on 3 main stages, stage one in
and around Galilee (up to roughly 8:21), stage two on the road to Jerusalem (roughly 8:22-10:52) and stage
three in the capital itself (from 11:1 on).
4 Gundry, Mark. Mark: A commentary on His Apology for the Cross. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans Publishing
Company, 1993. More than likely conative. I translated this were trying to bring seeing as the discipleswere interfering with their efforts.
5 in the Greek. in the middle voice with a genitive D.O. in this case means to make
close contact but frequently used as a means of conveying blessing (laying on hands) (BDAG.A Greek-English
Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. Third Edition. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press, 2000.)
7/28/2019 Exegesis of Mark 10 13-16
4/13
Dao 3
the children to continually be brought for their sake10
to me. Do not forbid them, for the
Kingdom of God is of such a kind as these11
. Truly, I am saying to you (that) whoever might not
receive for himself the kingdom of God as a child may certainly not12
enter into it. And after
hugging them, He was blessing them while laying hands on them.13
II. Commentary
Mark 10:13
.Mark does not give the identity of who was bringing the children to Jesus, nor does he specify any
details about the children (how old they are, their identities, etc.). The word carries an associated
meaning of infant and for this reason this passage had been used to defend infant baptism, however
these children could be anywhere from infancy to teen in years (the age of adulthood when a girl would
get married or a boy would be registered as a citizen)14
The parallel account of this story in Luke does
use the Greek word for babies and the parallel account in Matthew are explicit in saying that they were
6 Some manuscripts have reversed. The translation remains unchanged. See Appendix A-1.7Some manuscripts use here, meaning were rebuking the ones who werebringing them R.T. France (395) says that this could be a scribal clarification to show that the disciples werenot rebuking the children. See Appendix A-2.8 Inserted for clarity9 Some manuscripts have the word here (Aor pres Ind 2ndS) meaning rebuke or warn, but withthe 2nd person does not seem to make grammatical sense. See Appendix A-310 is the present middle infinitive form of. I brought out the nuances of the meaning in mytranslation.11Newer translations have this as For the Kingdom of God belongs to such as these, however I think addingthe word belongs interprets the text in a way that might not be present. The KJV stays truer to the Greek.12Wuest, Kenneth Samuel. Word studies in the Greek New Testament. Vol. 1. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans
Publishing Co, 1973. 200. construction with an aorist subjunctive is a very firm negation which
refers to a future situation.
13 A few manuscripts have alternate endings here. Both alternates seem to be stylistic clarifications of the
version put forth by NA27 as the original text. See Appendix A-4.14Ferguson, Everett. Backgrounds of Early Christianity. Third Edition. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans
Publishing Company, 2003.
7/28/2019 Exegesis of Mark 10 13-16
5/13
Dao 4
brought so that Jesus could lay hands on them15
. The antiquity of the time was that if you touched a
holy man, even his clothing16
, that it would confer blessing or perhaps healing17
.
We can only start with what would have been known culturally about children in that era. Keener
writes that Children were loved but were socially powerless; the high infant mortality rate meant that
they were physically powerless as well."18
Coupled with infanticide19
as a common practice, children
were not held in very high regards to say the least. Looking at the disciples attitudes, it seems they
would agree that Jesus was not to be troubled with such trivial things such as children. The verb being
used here for rebuke is ,used elsewhere in mark for the Exorcism of demons (1:25,
3:12, 9:25), opponents of Gods will (4:39, 8:30-33) , or outright censure (10:13, 48)20. A strong
word for people bringing children to Jesus.
Curiously enough, Mark writes about children in 9:36-37, forming a sandwich structure that
pervades most of Marks style21
. It reads 36Taking a child, He set him before them, and taking him in
His arms, He said to them, 37 Whoever receives one child like this in My name receives Me; and
whoever receives Me does not receive Me, but Him who sent Me. The first hearers of Mark would
have heard Jesus tell his Disciples that they should receive children in his name, only to find out a
short while later they are doing the opposite and rebuking those who are bringing children! Their
15 Calvin, John. Harmony of the Evangelists, Matthew, Mark, and Luke (Calvin's Commentaries). Trans. William
Pringle. Vol. 16. Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 2005.
16 Mk 5:2817Evans, Craig A. Mark 8:27 - 16:20 (Word Biblical Commentary). Ed. Bruce M. Metzger, David A. Hubbard and
Glenn W. Barker. Vol. 34b. Nashville: Thomas Nelsn Publishers, 2001.
18Keener, Craig. The IVP Bible Background Commentary: New Testament. Downer's Grove: Intervarsity Press,
1993.
19 Ferguson 8120Lane, William L. The Gospel According to Mark (The New International Commentary of the New Testament).
Ed. Gordon D Fee, F. F. Bruce and Ned B. Stonehouse. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company,
1974.
21France 18 goes into more detail about the structure of Marks sandwiches
7/28/2019 Exegesis of Mark 10 13-16
6/13
Dao 5
exclusive attitude surfaces again in this story just as it did in Mark 9:38-4022. Mark sets up this
section quite nicely to highlight the failure of the disciples (a running theme in Mark) and to
prepare for Jesus response.
Mark 10:14
, , .
Mark tells of a very powerful response from Jesus. This has been said to be one of the only times
that Jesus was described as angry and interestingly it is omitted in both Matthew and Luke.23 However,
other accounts24
are comparable. Continuing with the discussion from the previous verse, Jesus has every
right to be indignant with his disciples, the ones closest to him. After he just finished speaking about
receiving children in his name25in 9:37, Jesus anger clearly demonstrates how important this issue is to
him.
Verse 14 starts the focus of Marks inclusion of this periscope, concentrating on what Jesus said.
Jesus gives one command and one prohibition both to the same effect. There is quite a strong emphasis
on this exhortation given to the disciples; however the basis of the exhortation and arguably the central
part of the entire passage occurs in 14f For the Kingdom of God is of such a kind as these.26 Both the
exhortation and the warning given in verse 15 hinge on this line.
is reminiscent to the passage beforehand about the man who was casting
out demons in the name of Jesus, even though he was not one of the twelve27. Early hearers would
22 Hurtado, Larry W. Mark (New International Biblical Commentary). Edited by W. Ward Gasque. Vol. 2.
Peabody: Hendrickson Publishers, 1989.23Brooks, James A. Mark (The New American Commentary). Edited by David S. Dockery. Vol. 23. Nashville:
Broadman Press, 1991.
24 Mark 3:5, Mark 11:12-1925Hurtado 159 In my name means something like Because they belong to me or for my sake 26 See Appendix C27 Gundry 544
7/28/2019 Exegesis of Mark 10 13-16
7/13
Dao 6
have picked up on this fact. The parallels this passage has with the previous ones start becoming
clearer.
is being used as a Predicate nominative, despite its genitive form28. It is
also placed first in the sentence, giving it more weight than the subject ( )29. This
statement is the key to understanding Jesus statements about the Kingdom of God. Some
translation use the phrasing The kingdom of God belongs to such as these, but it can be
problematic because it adds the implication that it can belong to others in addition to those like
children and that they may only be a small part. The kingdom of God is of such a kind as these
could quite possibly mean that the kingdom of God is composed of such a kind, in that case would
mean that everyone who is in the kingdom of God has some sort of childlike characteristic (because
the word is and not toutwn).30 Thus, whereas before in verse 13 and 14c, children were
in reference to actual children present, here it refers to members of the kingdom such as the little
children represent. It may even be in reference to in 9:37 and the little ones in 9:42,
again showing Marks intentionality in placing this passage.31
If we look back to understand this discourse concept of children, we can see that Jesus uses
the child in John 3:7 as the symbol of the least (as they were the least in society) in stark contrast to
the disciples argument about who is the greatest. Thus the status of the child is that of the very last
and servant of all. Another powerful symbol of what it means to be a disciple of Christ and to be a
member of the Kingdom of God.
Mark 10:15 , ,
.
28 See Appendix B-129Ibid.30 France 39631 France 397
7/28/2019 Exegesis of Mark 10 13-16
8/13
Dao 7
This is one of fourteen32sayings of Mark, marking various pronouncements and
warnings and it occurs in a small and easily overlooked passage such as this. As a sort of
elaboration on 14f33, this verse simply states that one must be able to receive the Kingdom of God.
Again, Marks use of repetition of words has this verse echo that of 9:37 with the use of, but
in a different sort of meaning, a pun if you will. According to BDAG, can mean to welcome
or receive, as in a child, or can mean approving or receptive of, as is being used of the Kingdom of
God.34 So then, just how does one receive the kingdom like a child?
The kingdom of God in this verse is described as both being able to be received and able to
be entered35
, each with a different tense ( in the present and referring to an event
sometime in the future)36. Because this verse hinges on Verse 14f, we already know that to have the
status of a child is to be last and servant of all, so to enter the Kingdom of God is to enter with
nothing at all. Children had no social status and were completely dependent on their parents and
powerless to dictate their own future and even their very lives. Because of their high mortality rate,
they were considered expendable, but not even the least of these has been overlooked by God. This
verse echoes Matthew 5:3 Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven37. It
seems that these children are being lifted up not for what they have, but what they lack.38
To approach it another way, how does a male child (i.e. son) receive anything in Greco-
Roman and Jewish context? It is generally through inheritance. When does a child receive his
32 France 39733 See Appendix C34 Bauer, Watler, Frederick William Danker, W. F. Arndt, and F. W. Gingrich.A Greek-English Lexicon
of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. Third Edition. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press, 2000.
35 France 39736 Hooker 23937 Weber, Hans-Ruedi.Jesus and the Children. Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1979. 19.
38 Edwards 307
7/28/2019 Exegesis of Mark 10 13-16
9/13
Dao 8
inheritance? When he is fully grown, mature and responsible, and generally after the Father dies39.
With death comes inheritance, and as the gospel plays out, that is exactly what happens. We
become inheritors of Gods kingdom by becoming Sons of God through the death (and resurrection)
of Christ. The maturing process is the process of learning how to be a disciple of Christ. However, it
is ultimately up to God to give out his inheritance to whomever he wills. As Cranfield summarizes,
To receive the kingdom of God is to allow oneself to be given it, because one knows one cannot
claim it as ones right or attempt to earn it.40
Mark 10:16 .Verse 16 is the tender and loving resolution to the entire scene. occurs
twice41and does not occur anywhere else in the New Testament42 and in both cases have
been used only with children. The compound word seems to imply that Jesus blessed
them fervently43. The original bringers of the children only wanted the littlest touch from Jesus and
a blessing; however he embraces each one of them and hugs them, then proceeds to lay hands44 on
them and bless them, a very time consuming process45 and well past what was expected out of a
Rabbi. Jesus treatment and affection towards children has been so contrary to the norms of
society46 that it provides a powerful end to this pericope. The first hearers of this story must have
39 The Parable of the Prodigal son in Luke 15:11-32 is a powerful story in which a son demands his
inheritance before his Fathers death, effectively wishing his father was dead.40 Cranfield, C.E.B. The Gospel According to St. Mark. Cambridge: University Press, 1974.41 Mark 9:36, Mark 10:1642Gould, Ezra P. The Gospel According to Saint Mark (International Critical Commentary). Edited by Charles A.
Briggs, Samuel R Driver and Alfred Plummer. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1896. 188.
43 Cranfield 32444 Edwards 308 The laying on of hands was a well known method of blessing stemming from the Patriarchs
(Gen 9:26-27, Gen 27, 28:1-4)45 Gundry 545 states thatis an iterative imperfect, meaning he did this for each child one after
another.46 Ferguson 81. Writes about a letter found dating to 1BC which illustrated the pagan attitude: I beg you andentreat you, take care of the little one, and as soon as we receive our pay, I will send it up to you. If by chance
you bear a child, if it is a boy, let it be, if it is a girl, expose it. Exposing basically meant to throw the baby out,
7/28/2019 Exegesis of Mark 10 13-16
10/13
Dao 9
been so amazed at the way this distinguished rabbi treated children. Jesus personal touch to the
resolution of this story gives to the people what the disciples tried to prevent them from getting and
so much more. His actions exaggerate his priorities to the disciples. Despite his mission to go to
Jerusalem, he spends a good amount of time blessing babies. Perhaps as a man who knew that the
end of his time on Earth was near, he wanted to enjoy his few fleeting moments.
III. ConclusionThe exegetical idea of the passage seems to contain these elements: 1) Subject: How might one
enter the Kingdom of God? 2) Complement: By becoming childlike in status and accepting it in
humility. Thus the larger exegetical idea is a contrast to Verse 15 which acts a summary statement:
One can only enter the kingdom of God by becoming childlike in status and accepting the Kingdom
in humility.
The entire passage is grounded firmly by Mark in its immediate context, drawing parallels from
the stories and passages before it. Mark 10:13-16 is immediately followed up by another passage
about entering the kingdom by certainly no coincidence. In the story of the rich man, Jesus
proclaims that it is impossible for the man with everything (riches) to get into heaven in stark
contrast to the child who shares in the kingdom freely for having nothing. Mark 10:29 ends by
commended those who have given up everything to follow Jesus in another statement and
echoes again Mark 9:35, saying the first will be last and the last will be first bringing this section
back full circle for the hearers of Mark (very much like a larger sandwich structure).
In terms of application for this passage many people read as just a nice little story about Jesus
loving children, but mainly this is a narrative told by Mark to describe the kind of person who can
get into the Kingdom of God. Is this passage saying "all Children go to heaven?" Probably not. Only
exposed to the elements to die. Sometimes these girls would be picked up and sold into sexual slavery, an
arguably worse fate.
7/28/2019 Exegesis of Mark 10 13-16
11/13
Dao 10
those with simple faith like a child, who can look at the world with wonder and amazement and
innocence can receive the kingdom? Maybe, but that does this passage a bit of injustice. Two things
are clear: one must be given the Kingdom of God and one cannot hope to enter into the Kingdom of
God in their own. The aspect of children most highlighted in the fact that they have no power to
control their own security or make their own decisions in life so as to affect their fate. There is
much a child cannot do and a humility that comes with realizing that they cannot do things without
the assistance of an adult. A child cannot earn an inheritance, but can only receive it not by doing,
but simply being a child ofsomeone. A child must rely on others for their safety and security and in
the same way those who hope to enter into the Kingdom of God must rely on God himself to bring
them there. They must give up thinking that they can do these things on their own and must learn
to depend, as a child, on God for their daily sustenance. This emphasis is made only clearer in the
following scene involving a rich young ruler who cannot enter into the Kingdom due to his own self
reliance.
Jesus illustrates Kingdom principles by using children as an example. It is only in giving up our
ability to self determine our lives do we receive what is truly best for us. It is only in giving up hope
that we can make it on our own that we can begin to fully trust in God alone to save us. Those who
realize they have no power to change their spiritual destiny are the ones who are blessed and able
to receive gladly the gift of God. The passage points us to have less faith in ourselves and more faith
in God. It is having the presence of mind and the humility to admit that we are weak and powerless
children do we find we can accomplish all we could ever hope for in Christ who gives us strength.
7/28/2019 Exegesis of Mark 10 13-16
12/13
Dao 11
Bibliography
Bauer, Watler, Frederick William Danker, W. F. Arndt, and F. W. Gingrich.A Greek-English Lexicon of
the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. Third Edition. Chicago: University
of Chicago Press, 2000.
Brooks, James A. Mark (The New American Commentary). Edited by David S. Dockery. Vol. 23.
Nashville: Broadman Press, 1991.
Calvin, John. Harmony of the Evangelists, Matthew, Mark, and Luke (Calvin's Commentaries).
Translated by William Pringle. Vol. 16. Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 2005.
Cranfield, C.E.B. The Gospel According to St. Mark. Cambridge: University Press, 1974.
Edwards, James R. The Gospel According to Mark (The Pillar New Testament Commentary). Grand
Rapids: Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2002.
Evans, Craig A. Mark 8:27 - 16:20 (Word Biblical Commentary). Edited by Bruce M. Metzger, David A.
Hubbard and Glenn W. Barker. Vol. 34b. Nashville: Thomas Nelsn Publishers, 2001.
Ferguson, Everett. Backgrounds of Early Christianity. Third Edition. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans
Publishing Company, 2003.
France, R.T. The Gospel of Mark (The NEw International Greek Testament Commentary). Grand
Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2002.
Gould, Ezra P. The Gospel According to Saint Mark (International Critical Commentary). Edited by
Charles A. Briggs, Samuel R Driver and Alfred Plummer. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons,1896.
Gundry, Mark. Mark: A commentary on His Apology for the Cross. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans
Publishing Company, 1993.
Hooker, Morna D. The Gospel According to Saint Mark (Black's New Testament Commentaries).
Edited by Henry Chadwick. London: A&C Black (PUblishers) Limited, 1991.
Hurtado, Larry W. Mark (New International Biblical Commentary). Edited by W. Ward Gasque. Vol. 2.
Peabody: Hendrickson Publishers, 1989.
Keener, Craig. The IVP Bible Background Commentary: New Testament. Downer's Grove: Intervarsity
Press, 1993.
Lane, William L. The Gospel According to Mark (The New International Commentary of the New
Testament). Edited by Gordon D Fee, F. F. Bruce and Ned B. Stonehouse. Grand Rapids: Wm.
B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1974.
7/28/2019 Exegesis of Mark 10 13-16
13/13
Dao 12
Nestle, Erwin, Barbara Aland, and Kurt Aland. Novum Testamentum Graece. 27th edition. Stuttgart:
Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 1993.
Weber, Hans-Ruedi.Jesus and the Children. Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1979.
Wuest, Kenneth Samuel. Word studies in the Greek New Testament. Vol. 1. Grand Rapids: Wm. B.
Eerdmans Publishing Co, 1973.
Recommended