View
218
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
1. How committed are you to adopting/adhering to the teacher scholar model in your own professional performance?
Not committed at all
Marginally committed
Generally committed
Extremely committed 0 5 10 15 20 25
1
2
3
4
Series1
2. Should your FTE score be used as a factor in determining your overall productivity at the university during the annual performance evaluation?
No
Not sure
Yes
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
1
2
3
Series1
3. Should Norfolk State University adhere to the SCHEV FTE numbers based on course level and field of expertise or the numbers currently used (which require a higher FTE average per class)?
No
Not sure
Yes
0 5 10 15 20
1
2
3
Series1
4. Do you believe there is an inverse relationship between the FTE score and your scholarly productivity score?
No
Not sure
Yes
0 5 10 15 20 25
1
2
3
Series1
5. Has your department or school adopted a commitment to the teacher-scholar model?
Has no intention of pursuing this model
Will in the future
No
Yes
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
1
2
3
4
Series1
6. Has your department or school established a written guideline for tenure and promotion?
Has not discussed the creation of a guideline
Is currently developing guideline
No
Yes
0 5 10 15 20
1
2
3
4
Series1
7. Has your department or school established a written guideline for evaluation standards?
Has not discussed the creation of written
standards
Is currently developing guideline
No
Yes
0 5 10 15 20
1
2
3
4
Series1
8. Has your department adopted a 3-3 schedule for tenured and tenure-track faculty engaged in scholarly research?
Has no intention of pursuing this schedule
Will in the future
Yes
No
0 5 10 15 20
1
2
3
4
Series1
9. Has your department been supported by the dean in its plans to implement a 3-3 schedule?
Has indicated no plans to do so
Will in the future
Yes
No
0 5 10 15 20
1
2
3
4
Series1
10. How well-staffed is your department with tenured and tenure-track faculty?
Severely lacking in positions
Marginally staffed
Well-staffed
Very well-staffed
0 5 10 15
1
2
3
4
Series1
11. What is your position on outside employment for faculty?
Satisfied with guidelines already outlined in Faculty Handbook
Need stricter guidelines
Unfavorable
Favorable0 5 10 15 20
1
2
3
4
Series1
12. How important is a 3-year pre-tenure review for
faculty?
Should not be imposed
Marginally important
Extremely important
0 5 10 15 20 25
1
2
3
Series1
13. Do you support a stricter post-tenure review process?
Must be imposed equally across the
board
No
Yes
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
1
2
3
Series1
14. What is your stance on multi-year faculty positions?
A and B
Should be allowed to continue as is
Should have more variations (research or , clinical, or
teaching) but limited to a 1-2 year renewable contract
Should be minimized with more emphasis on tenure-track
positions
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
1
2
3
4
Series1
15. How important is it to have more than one name forwarded to a Dean as a possible candidate for selection of department chair.
Only the person obtaining a majority should be forwarded.
Not important
Somewhat important
Very important
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
1
2
3
4
Series1
16. If more than one name is submitted to the Dean for the position of Department Chair
None of the above. The two names garnering the
most votes should be forwarded even if they do not have the support of a
majority of the voting members of the department
facultyAll names submitted must have
the approval of a majority of the voting faculty in the
department 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
1
2
3
Series1
17. Faculty members should have representation on the calendar committee and one of the members should be a faculty senate representative
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly agree 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
1
2
3
4
Series1
18. Faculty should not be required to attend any functions not on the calendar
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly agree0 2 4 6 8 10 12
1
2
3
4
Series1
Recommended