FEH Robotics Project David Hanson Darren Ng Allen Roe Allen White 11: 30 Gryzbowski

FEH Robotics Project

David HansonDarren NgAllen RoeAllen White11: 30 Gryzbowski

Introduction

Team Members

Roles

Team Name

Team ρBOT

Robot Name

M.E.G.A.T.R.O.N. (Maneuverable Energy Generating

Appendages To Relieve Operating Necessities)

Evolution of Design

ORIGINAL MODIFIED FINAL

The “Kickstand”

Construction:•Two Futaba Servo Motors (Not Hacked)•Two Modified Cal Adapter for Servo Heads•Two ½” Acrylic Legs

Uses:•Start Within 9” x 9” Footprint•Lower and Raise Forks/Bumper Accordingly•Raise SIGNAL Hanger Up to Signal Beam

Plans for Competition

Path Strategy Paths shown are dependent where the

DROID is positioned. Paths identical in distance, but are

mirrored.

Plans for Competition cont.

Kickstand used to: Raise SIGNAL Release DUMPSTER Meet dimension requirements

Fork used to: Lift DUMPSTER Turn CRANK

Results

Individual Competition 3 performance tests

Course of actions

Results Score Seeding placement Resulting alterations made

Results cont.

Final Competition Results

Awarded 2nd most innovative design

Rationale for Mass ProductionMEGATRON is innovative

Dual-purpose appendagesWe believe the competitions are deceiving indicators what our DROID is capable ofSeveral unfortunate circumstances regarding the competition

Shaft encoders GPS

These problems are fixable before production

Summary/Conclusions

Overview Final alterations made Plans for production

Summary/Conclusions Brainstorming

Hand-drawn sketches Autodesk Inventor drawings

Testing/Refinement Drive-train calculations IC Code Chassis/appendages modified numerous times

(Fork, SIGNAL holder, kickstand etc.)

Final test before competition was successful 64 out of 80 point run

Summary/Conclusions

Results Individual Competition

10, 5, 10 point runs Seeded into a play-in bracket

Final Competition 8 point runs Failure most likely related to the GPS beacon

or code controlling GPS beacon

Conclusions MEGATRON displayed consistent success

during tests preceding the Final competition Reliably picked up/deposited DUMPSTER in

correct bin Turned CRANK 360˚+ on majority of runs Ascended RAMP every run when picking up

DUMPSTER Pressed SUBWAY button on more than half of

test runs Returned to CHARGER station and hit stop button

on nearly every test run

Conclusions MEGATRON did not duplicate success in

Final competition due to faulty navigation Turned into wall and got stuck

Final alterations Modifying code to average GPS values to help

with navigation We believe this would result in an extremely

successful DROID

Acknowledgments

Dr. Deb

All the TA’s

Questions/Answers Session

References Autodesk Inventor (2012). Used April 29, 2012 Carmen (2012). Final Report Presentation. Retrieved April 29, 2012 from

https://carmen.osu.edu/d2l/lms/content/viewer/main_frame.d2l?ou=10355428&tId=472 6035 Carmen (2012). Final Report Rubric. Retrieved April 29, 2012 from

https://carmen.osu.edu/d2l/lms/content/viewer/main_frame.d2l?ou=10355428&tId=472 6035 Carmen (2012). InteractiveC. https://carmen.osu.edu/d2l/lms/content/viewer/main_frame.d2l?

ou=10355428&tId=472 6035 Carmen (2012). Inventor Sketches. https://carmen.osu.edu/d2l/lms/content/viewer/main_frame.d2l?

ou=10355428&tId=472 6035 Carmen (2012). Scenario Rev. A. Retrieved May 10, 2012 from

https://carmen.osu.edu/d2l/lms/content/viewer/main_frame.d2l?ou=10355428&tId=472 8631 Carmen (2012). Temporary Course Sketch. Retrieved April 17, 2012 from

https://carmen.osu.edu/d2l/lms/content/viewer/main_frame.d2l?ou=10355428&tId=465 8089 FEH Website (2012). How to Hack a Servo. http://feh.osu.edu/Design-

Project/References/servo.html FEH Website (2012). Parts List. https://feh.osu.edu/secure/companystore/ FEH Website (2012). Team Budget. Retrieved April 29, 2012 from http://feh.osu.edu/Design-

Project/Design-project.htm FEH Website (2012). Various Wiring Diagrams. http://feh.osu.edu/Design-Project/Design- project.htm