Flow Artifacts & Magnetic Resonance Angiography•Displacement artifacts 5 of 185 Flow-Related...

1 of 185

Flow Artifacts & Magnetic

Resonance Angiography

Hsiao-Wen Chung (鍾孝文), Ph.D., Professor

Dept. Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan Univ.

Dept. Radiology, Tri-Service General Hospital

2 of 185

Blood in MRI

• Sometimes bright (strong signal)

• Sometimes dark (no signal)

• Different from in vitro -- artifacts ?

3 of 185

Bright Blood & Black Blood in MRI

Gradient echo Spin echo

4 of 185

Blood Flow Artifacts

• Flow-related enhancement

– Bright blood in gradient echo

• Flow void (spin-echo)

• Displacement artifacts

5 of 185

Flow-Related Enhancement

Neck Abdomen

6 of 185

Bright Blood in MRI

• Prominent in T1-weighted image

• Only in through-plane flow

• Slice-dependent in multi-slice

7 of 185

Through-plane & In-plane Flow

Often bright Not too bright

image slice

vessel

8 of 185

Multi-slice Brightness

Brighter towards upstream

9 of 185

MRI Image Formation

• Magnetization

• RF excitation

• Spatial encoding repeat N times

• Signal receiving

• Image calculation

10 of 185

Bright Blood in MRI

11 of 185

2D Gradient-echo Sequence

12 of 185

MRI Sequence Diagram

Repeat many times

13 of 185

Magnetization Changes in Sequence

short TR

y’ x’

14 of 185

Saturation Phenomena at Short TR

short T1

long T1

T1WI : TR ~ 600

15 of 185

Effects of T1 on Signals

• Short TR no time for T1 recovery

low signal saturation

• “Saturation” effect

• TR ~ 200 msec: more or less

16 of 185

Saturation Phenomena of Blood

RF excitation

image slice

vessel blood

17 of 185

Signal receiving and T1 recovery

18 of 185

T1 recovery

19 of 185

Next RF excitation

20 of 185

“Yellow” part not excited previously !

21 of 185

Magnetization Changes in Sequence

short TR

y’ x’

22 of 185

Saturation in Blood Flow

• Static tissue somehow saturated

• Flowing blood less saturated

• Less saturation = bright signal

• Flow-related enhancement (FRE)

23 of 185

Bright Blood in Abdomen

Flow-related enhancement on T1WI

1.5 Tesla

GE Signa

Gradient-echo

Aorta & IVC

especially bright

on T1WI

24 of 185

Shortened T1 with Flow ?

• Bright signal at short TR

• Found in 1951 by Suryan G

• 1946: NMR, 1973: MR imaging

25 of 185

What Affect FRE ?

• TR selection

• Velocity and slice thickness

• Flip angle

• Velocity distribution in vessel

26 of 185

FRE vs. Velocity & Slice Thickness

Blood flow

27 of 185

What Affect FRE ?

• TR selection

• Flip angle

28 of 185

Flip Angle Effects

• FRE generally larger at large flip

angle (T1-weighted)

• Much more complicated in reality

• Will be addressed later

29 of 185

Flip Angle Controls PD or T1 Contrast

T1 weighting PD weighting

Bo Bo z'

Large angle:

recover from 0

Small angle:

little room for

recovery

30 of 185

What Affect FRE ?

• TR selection

• Flip angle

31 of 185

No Bulk Blood Flow in Vessel !

Different FRE in one single vessel

laminar

32 of 185

Bright Blood in MRI

scans ?

33 of 185

Multi-slice Saturation Phenomena

Exciting the first slice

image slice

vessel

34 of 185

Exciting the second slice

image slice

vessel

35 of 185

Exciting the third slice

image slice

vessel

36 of 185

Exciting the first slice again

Prominent FRE

image slice

vessel

37 of 185

Some blood already saturated due to first RF

No prominent FRE

image slice

vessel

38 of 185

Most blood saturated due to two previous RFs

image slice

vessel

No prominent FRE

39 of 185

Multi-slice Brightness

Brighter toward upstream

40 of 185

Multi-slice FRE

• Prominent FRE toward upstream

• Especially the first “entry” slice

– Entry slice phenomena

• True only in sequential scan

41 of 185

Entry-Slice FRE Phenomena

Entry slice Inner slice

42 of 185

FRE & Slice Order

• Sequential & interleave different

• FRE too complicated in

interleaving scan omitted

• But it is an artifact anyway !

43 of 185

Sequential & Interleave Scan

FRE substantially different

image slice Sequential: 4 3 2 1

Interleave: 4 2 3 1

44 of 185

Other FRE Artifacts

• Flow ~ motion, motion ghosts

• FRE leads to strong blood signal,

hence bright ghosts as well

• How to eliminate FRE ?

45 of 185

FRE Combined with Motion Ghosts

Bright blood and strong ghosts of aorta

Strong enhancement

leads to obvious

motion ghosts !

46 of 185

Eliminating FRE Artifacts

• Reduce upstream blood signals

– Inflow saturation

• Ghosts from blood flow motion

also removed

47 of 185

Inflow Saturation

• Excite upstream of the slice

• Immediate select the slice

• Blood saturated before flowing into

the image slice

• No signals black blood

48 of 185

Inflow Saturation Principle

gradient echo saturate

image slice

SAT bands

49 of 185

Multi-directional Inflow Saturation

Operator selectable, or pre-selected in a protocol

SAT bands

Image volume

2 bands along each

of the 3 directions

6 SAT bands

50 of 185

Superior Inflow Saturation

No Sat With Sat

51 of 185

Inferior Inflow Saturation

No Sat With Sat

52 of 185

Comparison of Sup/Inf SAT

Aorta & IVC both darkened after SAT

53 of 185

Note : Not Only These

• We discussed only flow effects

• Not the compositions of blood !

• Fresh blood? Fresh blood clot? Old

blood clot? Scar? Out of the scope of

this course

54 of 185

Artifact Can Be Useful

• If the blood signal is so bright that

the static tissue looks no signal …

• Image contains only blood vessels ?

• Time Of Flight MR angiography !

55 of 185

Artifacts Can Be Useful

Image would contain only blood vessels !

Adjust scanning

parameters to emphasize

enhancement and to

suppress static tissue

signals

56 of 185

Time-of-Flight MR Angiogram

Angiography using bright blood signals

57 of 185

Time-of-Flight Magnetic

58 of 185

Vessel Bright, Other Dark

• Time Of Flight MR angiography

– No contrast agents used

– No subtraction used

– Completely noninvasive

59 of 185

MIP MRA in Circle of Willis

Axial view Sagittal oblique view

60 of 185

Comparison: Invasive X-ray Angio

Interventional radiology (diagnosis & therapy)

61 of 185

Blood Behavior in MRI

• Static tissue suppress FRE

– Inflow saturation

• Blood vessels enhance FRE

– TOF MR Angiogram

62 of 185

From FRE To MRA

• From multiple slices to multi-angle

projection

• Maximum Intensity Projection

– MIP : computer calculation

• Volume (surface) rendering …

63 of 185

… using bright blood signals

64 of 185

Maximum Intensity Projection

Any orientation, computer calculation

65 of 185

2D TOF MRA

Carotid arteries at three different angles

66 of 185

MRA Lecture Over ?

• No. Not that easy !

• To show up vessels faithfully?

– Better contrast

– Artifact removal

67 of 185

What Affect FRE ?

• TR selection

• Flip angle

• Factors determining MRA success

68 of 185

Better MRA Contrast

• Adjust scanning parameters

– Slice thickness & orientation

– TR & flip angle

– Saturate unwanted vessels

69 of 185

Slice Orientation

• FRE only in thru-plane flow

• Slice perpendicular to vessel

• Curved vessels often look

narrow due to less FRE

70 of 185

Through-plane & In-plane Flow

Often bright Not too bright

image slice

vessel

71 of 185

Slice Orientation Effects

Narrow proximal anterior tibial artery branch ?

72 of 185

Slice Thickness

• FRE comes from blood flowing “out

of” the image slice

• FRE obvious for thin slices

• Spatial resolution also higher

• Note gradient & SNR restrictions

73 of 185

Blood flow

74 of 185

Better MRA Contrast

– TR & flip angle

75 of 185

TR Effects

• FRE comes from blood flowing “out of”

the image slice

• Short TR insufficient time to flow out

• Long TR static tissues less saturated

• Optimal TR = thickness / velocity

76 of 185

Blood flow

optimal TR

77 of 185

Flip Angle Effects

• Large flip angle favors T1 contrast

• Bright blood leads to flow ghosts

• Large flip angle may partially

saturate slow flow

– Close to static tissue regime

78 of 185

Flip Angle Effects on Ghosts

Angle = 900 Angle = 600 Angle = 300

A : anterior tibial artery

P : common peroneal trunk artery

79 of 185

Flip Angle Effects

• Quite complicated in reality

• Anatomical location dependent

– Different flow velocities

• 45 ~ 60 frequently used (2D TOF)

80 of 185

Flip Angle Effects on MRA

Also note small vessel contrast

81 of 185

Note: TR & Flip Angle

• More important in slow flow

– Relative to slice thickness

• Often not critical in 2D TOF MRA

• Essential in 3D TOF MRA

82 of 185

Better MRA Contrast

– TR & flip angle

83 of 185

Use of Saturation Band

• Suppress unwanted vessels to avoid

overlapping

• SAT band follows the slice

– Tracking SAT

• Order: from downstream to upstream

84 of 185

Inflow Saturation Principles

gradient echo saturation

image slice

SAT band

85 of 185

Jugular Vein Suppressed with SAT

Angiogram Arteriogram

86 of 185

Use of Saturation Band

• Suppress unwanted vessels to avoid

overlapping

• SAT band follows the slice

• Tracking SAT

• Order: from downstream to upstream

87 of 185

Tracking SAT Principles

Excitation from downstream to upstream

image slice SAT band

SAT band

always follows

the image slice

88 of 185

Just Like Entry-Slice FRE Phenomena

Entry slice Inner slice

89 of 185

Better MRA Contrast

– TR & flip angle

90 of 185

MRA Not Over Yet !

– Better contrast

91 of 185

MRA Artifacts

• Intra-voxel phase dispersion

causes apparent narrowing of

blood vessels

• Interrupt from bright signal of fat

92 of 185

Intra-Voxel Dephasing

• Non-uniform or turbulent flow

• Dephasing occurs with gradient

• Dephasing in one voxel low

signal looks like no flow

93 of 185

No Bulk Blood Flow in Vessel !

Different FRE in one single vessel

laminar

94 of 185

Turbulent Flow

Carotid Artery Basilar Artery

S Cerebellar

Cerebral P Cerebral

95 of 185

Pseudo Stenosis from Dephasing

MRA XRA

96 of 185

Reason for Narrowing

• Gradient = local magnetic field

• Flow Bo changed phase

• Different flow = different phase

low signal from dephasing

• Pseudo-stenosis

97 of 185

Risk of False Positive

• Can’t be regarded as normal

– Stenosis often seen in patients

• Over-estimate of stenosis

– Dephasing due to turbulent flow

98 of 185

Over-Estimated Stenosis

Stenosis magnified due to dephasing signal loss

99 of 185

Slice Orientation Is One Reason Too

100 of 185

What about Aneurysm ?

• Possible slow flow

• Vortex may also be present

• Signal loss like static tissue ?

• Under-estimate of aneurysm

101 of 185

Under-Estimate of Aneurysm

One drawback of MRA (false negative)

signal loss due to vortex

looks like static tissue

102 of 185

Remedy : Flow Comp

• Flow Compensation (GE)

• GMR (Siemens), MAST (Picker)

• Pre-calculated gradient waveform to

yield phase independent of flow

103 of 185

Gradient Moment Rephasing

No GMR With GMR

104 of 185

Intra-voxel Dephasing & Flow Comp

No flow comp With flow comp

105 of 185

Remedy : Short TE

• Dephasing takes time

• Short TE to reduce dephasing

– Or less signal loss

• Fractional Echo (remember?)

106 of 185

k-space Data Omission

Half Fourier Fractional echo

107 of 185

Fractional Echo Sequence

TE can be shortened

z gradient

RF (B1) t

y gradient t

x gradient t ...

108 of 185

Short TE & GMR Effects

Stenosis downstream signal loss at long TE

TE = 1.5 2.5 3.8 5.3 6.2 7.0 8.0

109 of 185

Flow Comp Leads to Longer TE

No GMR With GMR

110 of 185

MRA Artifacts

• Intra-voxel phase dispersion

causes apparent narrowing of

blood vessels

• Interrupt from bright signal of fat

111 of 185

Fat Artifacts

• TOF MRA is from T1 contrast

• Fat has a short T1

• Strong fat signal looks like blood

vessels ?

112 of 185

3D TOF MRA (Circle of Willis)

Note the periorbital fat

113 of 185

Remove Fat Artifacts

• CHESS fat SAT (remember?)

• Successful fat SAT requires …

– Shimming

– Avoid air/tissue interface …

114 of 185

CHESS Principles

900 fat only

spin-echo fat-SAT

115 of 185

Fat SAT Comparison (Original Image)

No Fat SAT Fat SAT

116 of 185

Fat SAT Comparison (MIP MRA)

No Fat SAT Fat SAT

117 of 185

Never Forget Though …

• Successful fat SAT requires

– Uniform Bo & B1 …

• Failed fat suppression leads to

confusing TOF MRA !

118 of 185

Fat SAT in MRA (Courtesy a Friend)

No Fat SAT Fat SAT

119 of 185

MRA Still Not Over Yet!

– Better contrast

• What about 3D TOF MRA then?

120 of 185

3D Time-of-Flight

MR Angiography

121 of 185

… using bright blood signals

122 of 185

Maximum Intensity Projection

Any orientation, computer calculation

123 of 185

Motivation of 3D MRA

• Multiple 2D images for projection

are already 3D in nature

• Why not just doing 3D then ?

124 of 185

MRA Needs 3D Volume Anyway

3D MRA has slice resolution advantages

2D MRA 3D MRA

125 of 185

2D & 3D MRA

• Same FRE principle on 3D scan

– More thinner slices

– Higher SNR

126 of 185

Review: 3D MRI Principle

• Not too different from 2D

• Another loop for slice encoding

• Thick slab selection

– Scan time much longer

127 of 185

3D Imaging Pulse Sequence

Gz & Gy form two inner/outer loops

z gradient

RF (B1) t

y gradient t

x gradient t

sample

128 of 185

3D MRI Properties

• Scan time concern -- short TR

– Small a, gradient-echo, T1WI

• SNR ~ slice number

– Trade high SNR for thin slice

129 of 185

Review : Good TOF MRA

• Gradient-echo (avoid flow void)

• Short TR (T1WI & FRE)

• Proper scanning parameters

• Consistent with 3D MRI !

130 of 185

Bright Blood & Black Blood MRI

Gradient echo Spin echo

131 of 185

3D MRA Motivation

• Multiple 2D images for projection are

already 3D in nature

• Same FRE principle on 3D scan

– More thinner slices

– Higher SNR

132 of 185

3D Limitations Though …

• Factors affecting FRE

– Slice thickness & TR

• Extremely complicated in 3D !

133 of 185

RF excitation

image slice

vessel blood

134 of 185

Signal receiving and T1 recovery

135 of 185

T1 recovery

136 of 185

Next RF excitation

137 of 185

“Yellow” part not excited previously !

experience 2 RF

experience 1 RF

138 of 185

FRE in 3D MRI

RF excitation

image slab

vessel blood

139 of 185

FRE in 3D MRI

Signal receiving, T1 recovery

140 of 185

FRE in 3D MRI

T1 recovery

141 of 185

FRE in 3D MRI

Next RF excitation

142 of 185

FRE in 3D MRI

3D FRE obviously weaker (not too critical)

experience 2 RF

experience 1 RF

143 of 185

FRE in 3D MRI

Inconsistent vessel contrast after slicing !

brighter vessel upstream darker vessel downstream

144 of 185

3D Slab Thickness

• Thick slab leads to complex FRE

• Upstream shows strong FRE,

downstream gradually saturated

• Darkened vessel looks narrowed

• Prominent in slow flow

145 of 185

Gradually Darkened 3D TOF MRA

Lowered signal at downstream

146 of 185

2D & 3D FRE (Carotid Bifurcation)

2D TOF : uniform 3D TOF : clear edge

147 of 185

TR Effects on Vessel Intensity

Short TR shows strong intensity gradient

experience 2 RF

experience 1 RF

148 of 185

Solution

• Less RF for the upstream

– Small flip angle excitation

• More T1 weighting at downstream

– Large flip angle excitation

149 of 185

Solution

• Flip angle varies locally

– Using one single RF pulse

– RF solved with simple math

– TONE (Siemens), RAMP (GE)

150 of 185

TONE & sinc RF Pulse Comparison

Control saturation for uniform vessel signal

flip angle

sinc RF pulse

TONE RF pulse

151 of 185

TONE (Ramp) Pulse Comparison

Sinc RF pulse TONE pulse

152 of 185

Combining Pros of All Flip Angles

Also note small vessel contrast

153 of 185

3D TOF MRA Properties

• FRE weaker than 2D

– Background suppression

relatively important

• MT saturation & fat suppression

154 of 185

FRE in 3D MRI

3D FRE obviously weaker

experience 2 RF

experience 1 RF

155 of 185

Fat SAT Comparison (Original Image)

No Fat SAT Fat SAT

156 of 185

Fat SAT Comparison (MIP MRA)

No Fat SAT Fat SAT

157 of 185

Fat SAT in MRA (Courtesy a Friend)

No Fat SAT Fat SAT

158 of 185

MT Saturation

• Magnetization transfer saturation

• No time to explain, but basically...

• Suppresses tissues containing

large protein molecules

159 of 185

MTS for MRA

• Suppress background tissues to

enhance blood signals

– Relatively few proteins in blood

– Serum albumin relatively small

– MTS stronger in static tissues

160 of 185

MTS Comparison (Original Image)

No MTS with MTS

161 of 185

MTS Comparison (MIP MRA)

No MTS with MTS

162 of 185

TONE & MTS Comparison

None MTS MTS + TONE

Note conspicuity of small vessels

163 of 185

3D TOF MRA Properties

• Less prone to darkened intensity

due to curved vessels

• Obviously an advantage

164 of 185

Slice Orientation (2D)

• FRE only in thru-plane flow

• Weak signal at curved vessels

– Narrowing, pseudo-stenosis

165 of 185

Slice Orientation Effects

166 of 185

FRE & Slice Orientation

• Perpendicular at entrance suffices

– Unsaturated blood flows into

imaging region (slice or slab)

– Unimportant afterwards

• 3D slab thick, easy to handle

167 of 185

2D MRA Slice Orientations

Not all slices can be made perpendicular

168 of 185

3D MRA Slab Orientation

FRE from carotid artery, Circle of Willis unaffected

169 of 185

2D versus 3D

• 2D : think slice stronger FRE

good for slow flow (venogram)

• Insensitive to in-plane flow

• Application : carotid arteries

170 of 185

Note : “Slow” ??

• About venous flow

• No FRE if too slow

– Example : CSF

• Flow ~ w.r.t. TR & slice thickness

171 of 185

2D TOF MRA

Carotid arteries at three viewing angles

172 of 185

2D versus 3D

• 3D : thick slab, weaker FRE

• SNR & resolution both better

• Curved vessels are fine

• Application : circle of Willis

173 of 185

3D MRA (MIP) of the Circle of Willis

Axial view Sagittal oblique view

174 of 185

Common 3D TOF MRA Today

175 of 185

Combining Advantages

• Slow curved flow (e.g., AVM)

• Multiple thinner 3D slabs

• Multiple Overlapped Thin-Slab

Acquisition (MOTSA)

176 of 185

Arteriovenous Malformation

Two 3D slabs to see slow flow

177 of 185

MOTSA of AVM

Visualize both arterial/venous sides of AVM

178 of 185

• Commercialized for aneurysm

and vascular malformation

• Inter-slab boundaries still visible

• Not too perfect yet

179 of 185

Multi-Slab Pitfalls (but fine)

Artifacts at overlapped slabs unavoidable

180 of 185

MRA Not Over Yet ...

• Artifacts: flow + gradient ~ phase

– Intravoxel phase dispersion

• Phase for velocity ?

• Next week : phase-contrast MRA

181 of 185

Flow Quantification at SVC

SVC flow profile in one cardiac cycle

SVC flow

cardiac phase

182 of 185

MRA Not Over Yet ...

• Artifacts : Fat interrupts MRA

– Short T1 strong signals

• Can we shorten blood T1 ?

• Advanced topic: CE MRA

183 of 185

Intracranial CE MRA (Aneurysm)

TOF MRA CE MRA

184 of 185

Body Contrast-Enhanced MRA

GI MRA Breast MRA

185 of 185

Flow Artifacts & Magnetic

186 of 185

FRE 在血管上游和下游的差異

TR = 20 TR = 40 TR = 80

Flow Artifacts & Magnetic Resonance Angiography•Displacement artifacts 5 of 185 Flow-Related...

Documents

CR Artifacts

IntroducontoFlowCytometry* · Mario Roederer, Cytometry 45:194-205 (2001) Spectral Compensation for Flow Cytometry: Visualization Artifacts, Limitations, and Caveats Nicole Baumgarth

Radiology Artifacts

ITIL Artifacts

Feedback Artifacts

41-185 Level and Flow Instruments for Modular Skid Systems

CSE 185 Introduction to Computer Vision Feature Tracking and Optical Flow

Workplace Artifacts

Sherborn artifacts

Physics artifacts

Filtering vascular flow artifacts in fMRI - unistra.fricube-miv.unistra.fr › en › img_auth.php › 8 › 87 › Anglais2.pdf1.2 Magnetic Resonance Angiography Magnetic Resonance

Film Artifacts

Iraqi artifacts

Artifacts 1

EEG artifacts

MARS ARTIFACTS

LAB-04 - uniroma1.itmarrella/slides/pm17/LAB-04-BPMN_Advanced_Concepts.pdfClassroom exercises 2. Recap: Data Artifacts ... In BPMN, data flow is decoupled from the sequence flow. 4

MRI artifacts

Radiograph Artifacts

FILM ARTIFACTS. ARTIFACTS: AN UNWANTED DENSITY ON THE FILM