Foundations of Sociological Inquiry Trust and Trickery in Social Research

Foundations of Sociological Inquiry

Trust and Trickery in Social Research

Today’s Objectives Establishing Trust Ethical Issues Ethical Controversies Validity and Reliability

Set up Clicker Technology Becky Plugs in Receiver & Sets Channel to 05 Becky Sets Up Web-Based Session Students with Clicker Set Channel to 05

Ch; 05; Ch Students with Wireless Device Login to

www.rwpoll.com Enter Session ID

Establishing Trust I am doing research to examine how course

evaluations differ by gender I am surveying students in all sociology classes Using your clicker, please respond to the following

questions Your responses are anonymous and will be kept

confidential

Do you trust me?

1 2 3

59%

31%

11%

1. Yes

2. No

3. Don’t Know

This course as a whole is:

1 2 3 4 5 6

1%

22%

1%1%

19%

56%1. Excellent

2. Very Good

3. Good

4. Fair

5. Poor

6. Very Poor

The course content is:

1 2 3 4 5 6

2%

18%

1%1%

21%

58%1. Excellent

2. Very Good

3. Good

4. Fair

5. Poor

6. Very Poor

The instructor overall is:

1 2 3 4 5 6

23%

41%

2%0%

6%

28%

1. Excellent

2. Very Good

3. Good

4. Fair

5. Poor

6. Very Poor

The instructor’s contribution to your understanding of concepts/ideas is:

1 2 3 4 5 6

19%

32%

1%0%

12%

36%

1. Excellent

2. Very Good

3. Good

4. Fair

5. Poor

6. Very Poor

The course content is:

1 2 3 4 5 6

4%

21%

1%1%

20%

54%

1. Excellent

2. Very Good

3. Good

4. Fair

5. Poor

6. Very Poor

The instructor’s interest in whether students learned is:

1 2 3 4 5 6

17%

44%

1%1%

11%

27%

1. Excellent

2. Very Good

3. Good

4. Fair

5. Poor

6. Very Poor

The amount learned in the course is:

1 2 3 4 5 6

2%

17%

2%

10%

21%

48%1. Excellent

2. Very Good

3. Good

4. Fair

5. Poor

6. Very Poor

The relevance and usefulness of homework assignments is:

1 2 3 4 5 6

8%

21%

5%6%

20%

40%1. Excellent

2. Very Good

3. Good

4. Fair

5. Poor

6. Very Poor

Professor Pettit examines how an instructor’s gender affects course evaluations. Pettit decides to compare evaluations of college students in different classes. She decides to begin her research using students in her class. After explaining the

1 2 3 4 5

7%11%

6%

48%

29%

study, she assures students that their responses will be confidential. The students complete her survey during class. Her research most clearly impinges on

1. deception.

2. no harm to participants.

3. voluntary participation.

4. the value placed on anonymity.

5. value-free reports of the data.

The main reason that codes of ethics exist are that

1 2 3 4 5

49%

9%12%

10%

20%

1. ethical issues are both important and ambiguous.

2. both the state and federal governments require them.

3. researchers would be both unwilling and unable to make ethical decisions without them.

4. the directors of the professional associations require and enforce them.

5. people are naturally unethical.

Ethical Issues in Social Research Ethical (Webster’s): conforming to the standards of

conduct of a given profession or group.

Ethical Issues in Social Research Ethical (Webster’s): conforming to the standards of

conduct of a given profession or group. Voluntary Participation

Ethical Issues in Social Research Ethical (Webster’s): conforming to the standards of

conduct of a given profession or group. Voluntary Participation DO NO HARM

Ethical Issues in Social Research Ethical (Webster’s): conforming to the standards of

conduct of a given profession or group. Voluntary Participation DO NO HARM Anonymity and Confidentiality

Which of the following techniques of data collection is MOST likely to make a guarantee of anonymity difficult?

1 2 3 4 5

60%

17%

9%

3%

11%

1. interviews

2. mailed questionnaires

3. secondary data analysis

4. unobtrusive measures

5. The data collection technique does not effect the guarantee of anonymity.

Ethical Controversies Trouble in the Tearoom – Laud Humphreys

Studied homosexual activities in public restrooms in parks

Researcher became interested in the lives of participants Researcher volunteered to become “watchqueen” Researcher collected personal information about the

participants (license numbers of cars)

What should have Laud Humphrey done in his “Trouble in the Tearoom” study to uphold ethical standards?

1 2 3 4 5

7%

65%

12%15%

0%

1. debriefed subjects.

2. allowed subjects to decline to be studied.

3. remained nonpolitical.

4. promised confidentiality.

5. revealed his identity.

Ethical Controversies Observing Human Obedience – Stanley Milgram

Participants imitated a laboratory-based World War II controversy

Participants were assigned job of “teacher” – to teach a list of works to the “pupil.” If the pupil got the word wrong, the teacher would administer increasing levels of shocks to the pupil.

The primary ethical research issue raised by the Milgram study was

1 2 3 4 5

44%

10%7%

25%

15%

1. the willingness of people to harm others when “following orders” required it.

2. the administration of electrical shocks to the pupils.

3. the effects of the methods on the pupils.

4. the effects of the methods on the teacher.

5. the examination of obedience as a topic for study.

Reliability and Validity Reliability

The extent to which a given measurement strategy would describe a concept in the same way if repeated again and again OR

The extent to which two or more measures provide the same description of a concept

Reliability and Validity Reliability

The extent to which a given measurement strategy would describe a concept in the same way if repeated again and again OR

The extent to which two or more measures provide the same description of a concept

Validity Internal Validity represents the extent to which a variable or

indicator accurately represents the concept it was chosen to measure

External Validity represents the extent to which findings from a study, based on a sample can be generalized to a larger population

27

.

•••

•

•

••

••

•••

High Reliability and High Validity

28

.

•••

•

•

••

••

•••

High Reliability and High Validity (Self-reported educational attainment)

29

.

•••

••••••••

••

•••••

•

High Reliability and Low Validity

30

.

•••

••••••••

••

•••••

•

High Reliability and Low Validity (Self-reported number of sexual partners)

31

.

•

•

••

•

•

••

•••

•

•

Low Reliability and High Validity

32

.

•

•

••

•

•

••

•••

•

•

Low Reliability and High Validity (Self-reported happiness)

Replicability Someone should be able to figure out what you did,

how you did it, and do it again Your work (observational or analytical) should

withstand further empirical scrutiny All of this rests on shared professional standards

(ethics)

Questions?