View
0
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
HARYANA POWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (World Bank Funded)
ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN - PACKAGE G6 March 2009 Rev 0
Prepared for: Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited (HVPNL)
Prepared by: SMEC (India) Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon
E2004v9
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Sl No. Particulars Page No.
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 - 2
1.1 General 1
1.2 Brief Profile of HVPNL 1
1.3 Project Objective 1
2.0 POLICY, LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 3 - 10
2.1 Environmental and Social Policy & Procedures (ESPP) of HVPNL 3
2.2 Salient Features of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 4
2.3 Salient Features of Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 7
2.4 Other Applicable Statutory Environmental Clearances 7
2.4.1 Declaration of eco-sensitive zones by Haryana Government 8
2.5 Project Categorisation 8
2.5.1 Categorisation Criteria of MoEF 8
2.5.2 Categorisation Criteria of World Bank 8
3.0 PROJECT SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY 11 - 12
3.1 Project Categorisation as per MoEF and World Bank 11
3.2 Scope of the Study 11
3.3 Methodology 11
4.0 PROJECT BASELINE ENVIRONMENT 13 – 18
4.1 Meteorology 13
4.2 Physical Environment 14
4.2.1 Land Resources 14
4.2.2 Ambient Air Quality 16
4.2.3 Water Resources 16
4.2.4 Noise Environment 17
4.3 Biological Environment 17
4.3.1 Flora 17
4.3.2 Fauna 17
4.4 Socio-economic Environment 17
5.0 DESCRIPTION OF SUB PROJECTS 19 - 40
5.1 The Sub Projects 19
5.1.1 Sub-Project 1 - 220 kV D/C Sector 72, Gurgaon to Rangla Rajpur (Firozpur Zirka) line 20
5.1.2 Sub-Project 2 - 220 kV D/C line from proposed 400 KV substation Nawada (Faridabad) to 22
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6
Sl No. Particulars Page No.
220 KV sub station A-6 Faridabad
5.1.3 Sub-Project 3 - LILO of both circuits of existing 220 KV D/C 400 KV Mayar (PGCIL Hisar)
S/Stn to Isherwal S/Stn at 220 KV S/Stn Sangwan (Tosham) 24
5.1.4 Sub-Project 4 - 220 kV D/C line with 400 KV S/Stn PKL to 220 KV S/Stn Raiwalli (Panchkula) 26
5.1.5 Sub-Project 5 - LILO of one circuit of 220 KV Panchkula- Tepla Line at 220 KV S/Stn Raiwali
(Panchkula) 29
5.1.6 Sub-Project 6 - LILO of 132 KV Isherwal- Jui S/C Line at 132 KV S/Stn Kairu (Bhiwani) 31
5.1.7 Sub-Project 7 - 132 kV S/C line on D/C tower with 0.4 sq. inch ACSR (Zebra) from 220 KV
Dhanonda to proposed 132 KV sub station Nangal Mohanpur (Mohindergarh) 33
5.1.8 Sub-Project 8 - 132 kV S/C line on D/C tower with 0.4 sq. inch ACSR (Zebra) from 220 KV
Dhanonda to proposed 132 KV sub station Pali (Gurgaon)- 10 km (Package G6) 35
5.1.9 Sub-Project 9 - LILO of 132 KV S/C Hansi- Namaud line at Masudpur (Hansi) 37
5.1.10 Sub-Project 10 - LILO of one circuit of 132 KV D/C PTPS- Chandauli line at 132 KV S/Stn
Kabri (Panipat) 39
6.0 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 41 – 44
6.1 During Construction Activities 41
6.2 During Operation Activities 43
7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 45 - 48
7.1 Components of EMP 45
7.2 Impacts, Mitigation and Institutional Responsibilities 45
7.3 Institutional Framework 45
7.3.1 EMP Implementation by HVPNL 45
7.3.2 EMP Implementation by Independent Agency 47
7.4 Capacity Building 48
7.5 Environmental Monitoring 48
7.6 Environmental Budget 48
8.0 STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTATION AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE 49 – 52
8.1 Institutional Stakeholders’ Consultation 49
8.2 Public Consultation 49
8.3 Purpose 50
8.4 Process Adopted 50
8.5 Outcome of Public Consultation 50
9.0 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 - 58
9.1 Specific Findings and Recommendations of each sub project 53
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6
LIST OF TABLES
Table No. Description Page No.
1.0 Abstract of the Grid Substations 1
1.1 Comprehensive Capacity Addition Program under 11th Five Year Plan 2
2.0 ROW Clearance Requirement between Conductors and Trees 4
2.1 Clearance Requirements for Laying of Transmission Lines 8
4.0 Ambient Air Quality in Sample Locations in the State of Haryana 16
4.1 Socio-Economic Profile of Haryana 17
5.0 Length of Transmission lines under Package G-6 19
5.1 Assessment of Alternatives for Sub Project 1 20
5.2 Assessment of Alternatives for Sub Project 2 22
5.3 Assessment of Alternatives for Sub Project 3 24
5.4 Assessment of Alternatives for Sub Project 4 26
5.5 Assessment of Alternatives for Sub Project 5 29
5.6 Assessment of Alternatives for Sub Project 6 31
5.7 Assessment of Alternatives for Sub Project 7 33
5.8 Assessment of Alternatives for Sub Project 8 35
5.9 Assessment of Alternatives for Sub Project 9 37
5.10 Assessment of Alternatives for Sub Project 10 39
7.0 Environmental Budget for Package G6 48
8.0 List of stakeholders during Institutional Consultation 49
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
No.
Description Page No.
2.0 Procedure for obtaining forest clearance 6
4.0 Typical rainfall distribution in Haryana 13
4.1 Principal landforms in Haryana 15
4.2 Basic soil associations in Haryana 15
6.0 Excavation for tower erection for 400kv transmission line 41
7.0 Three tier Institutional body at HVPNL 46
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6
LIST OF ANNEXURES
Annexure No. Description Page No.
I PROJECT AREA DEMARCATION ON DISTRICT PLANNING MAP 59
II PHOTOGRAPHS OF PROJECT SITE ALONG THE PROPOSED TRANSMISSION LINE 62
III PROPOSED TRANSMISSION LINE ON TOPOGRAPHIC SHEET 72
IV ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN 82
V ATTENDANCE OF PUBLIC CONSULTATION 89
VI PHOTOGRAPHS OF STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTATION 143
LIST OF APPENDIX
Annexure No. Description
I MoEF NOTIFICATION ON ARAVALLI HILLS
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
HPGCL Haryana Power Generation Corporation Ltd
UHBVNL Uttar Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd
DHBVNL Dakshin Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd.
ESPP Environmental And Social Policy And Procedures
BBMB Bhakra Beas Management Board
PGCIL Power Grid Corporation Of India Ltd
ROW Right Of Way
MoEF Ministry Of Environment And Forest
EIA Environment Impact Assessment
EA Environment Assessment
ESO Environment Safety Officer
ESIU Environment & Social Implementation Unit
ESMC Environment & Social Monitoring Committee
PPEs Personal Protective Equipments
O & M Operation And Maintenance
CPCB Central Pollution Control Board
DFO District Forest Officer
OP Operational Policy
SPCB State Pollution Control Board
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 General
Haryana, a small state in northern India was constituted as a state of India on 1st November, 1966 with
Chandigarh as its capital. Haryana's geographical proximity to the national capital New Delhi and a well-
developed telecom and transportation infrastructure are its major strengths in the economic field.
Haryana has a total of 81 cities and towns and 6,759 villages. For administrative purpose, the state is divided into
four divisions - Ambala, Rohtak, Gurgaon and Hisar. Geographically, Haryana is situated between 270 37' to 300
35' latitude and 740 28' to 770 36' longitude. The altitude of the state varies between 700 ft to 900 ft above the sea
level. The state is surrounded by Uttar Pradesh (U.P) on its eastern border, Punjab on its western border,
Uttranchal, Himachal Pradesh & Shivalik Hills on its northern border and Delhi, Rajasthan and Aravali Hills on its
southern border.
1.2 Brief Profile of HVPNL
The State’s power sector was restructured on August 14, 1998. At present, Haryana power sector comprises of
four wholly State-owned Nigams i.e. Haryana Power Generation Corporation Ltd (HPGCL), Haryana Vidyut
Prasaran Nigam Ltd. (HVPNL), Uttar Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd. (UHBVNL) & Dakshin Haryana Vidyut
Prasaran Nigam Ltd. (DHBVNL), which are responsible for power generation, transmission and distribution in the
State.
With its commitment towards planning of transmission projects in due consideration with minimum adverse
environmental & social impacts and hence providing sustainable development, HVPNL has developed its
Corporate Environmental and Social Policy and Procedures (ESPP) to address the environment and socio-
economic issues arising from its activities. The ESPP outlines HVPNL's approach and commitment to deal with
environmental and social issues, relating to its transmission projects, and lays out management procedures and
protocols to alleviate the same. The ESPP includes framework for identification, assessment, and management of
environmental and social concerns at both organizational and project levels.
An abstract of present scenario of Grid substations under HVPNL is given in Table 1.0.
Table 1.0: Abstract of the Grid Substations
Sl. No. Name of substation No. of substation as on 31.03.2008
1 400 kV substation 6 (PGCIL) + 2 (BBMB) = 8
2 220 kV substation 32 + 8 (BBMB) = 40
3 132 kV substation 120
4 66 kV substation 104
Source: ESPP, September 2008
This report has hence been prepared in due considerations with environmental and social policies and
procedures laid down in the ESPP.
1.3 Project Objective
To meet the growing power demand in the state, Haryana Power System Improvement Project has been
formulated to improve the transmission and distribution scenario in the state through strategic investments in the
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 2
infrastructure and institutions with loan assistance from World Bank. The project will be implemented through
HVPNL, UHVBNL, and DHVBNL.
For meeting power load growth & evacuation of the proposed capacity (expected 14 % growth) addition of power,
HVPNL has made a comprehensive transmission expansion program at an estimated cost of Rs.7643 crore
during 11th five year plan, which is given in Table 1.1.
Table 1.1: Comprehensive Capacity Addition Program under 11th Five Year Plan
Source of installed capacity 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
State Owned Projects 1587.40 1587.40 1587.40 1587.40 1587.40
Central Sector Share 1514.40 1514.40 1514.40 1514.40 1514.40
Shared Projects - BBMB & IP 937.50 937.50 937.50 937.50 937.50
DCRTPP Yamuna Nagar 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00
Hisar TPS (600X2) Mega Plant Status 1100.00 1100.00 1100.00
Jhajjar Case- II ~ (1150 ± 15%)* 1150.00 1150.00
Aravali STPS, Jhajjar (500*3) {Haryana: Delhi - 50:50}
750.00 750.00
Additional availability through PPA with IPPs/CPSU
111.70 233.70 876.70 1126.70 1930.70
Yamuna Nagar Extension 300.00 300.00
Faridabad Gas 432.00 432.00
Total Capacity (MW) 4751.00 4873.00 6616.00 9498.00 10302.0
Total Available Capacity (at 80% PLF) 3800.80 3898.40 5292.80 7598.40 8241.60
Source: ESPP, September 2008
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 3
2.0 POLICY, LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
As per provision contained in Haryana Electricity Reforms Act 1997 & Electricity Act, 2003 Acts, HVPNL has
authority to install transmission towers in any kind of land.
Mandatory environment requirements for HVPNL transmission works includes Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980,
Environment (Protection) Act 1986, Indian Electricity Rules 1956, Hazardous Waste (Management & Handling)
Rules 2003, Conservation of Natural resource related laws, Environment requirement of World Bank OP4.36 on
forest, World Bank OP 4.11 on physical cultural resources, World Bank OP 4.04 on natural habitats.
2.1 Environmental and Social Policy & Procedures (ESPP) of HVPNL
HVPNL is committed to identify, assess, and manage environmental and social concerns at both organization and
project levels by strictly following the basic principles of avoidance, minimization and mitigation of environmental
& social impacts with the improvement of Management System and introduction of State of the Art and proven
technologies. The power transmission system includes and incorporates the transmission line, its right of way
(ROW), Switchyards, Sub-stations. The principle structure of the transmission line includes the line itself,
conductors, towers supports etc. The voltage capacity of the transmission line affects the sizes required for
principal structures. The ROW in which transmission line is constructed ranges in width from 18 meters (66 kV) to
52 meters (for 400 kV line). The key principals of HVPNL environmental and social policy (ESPP) are:
Avoid carrying out operations in environmentally sensitive areas such as forests, national park, and
biosphere reserves;
Consider environmental implications of location, terrain, and sensitive areas in impact identification and
mitigate these with innovative / practical engineering solutions;
Application of efficient and safe technology practices;
Abate pollution in all its activities and operations;
Minimizing energy losses and promote energy efficiency in all activities;
Avoid any disruption of socially sensitive areas with regard to human habitation and areas of cultural
significance;
Wherever losses are suffered, assistance will be provided to the affected persons to improve or at least
regain their living standards;
Consultations will be held among local population regarding finalization of proposed route of the
transmission lines and sub-stations;
Ensure in delivering R&R entitlements and compensation for lost assets based on HVPNL’s entitlement
framework;
Involuntary resettlement will be avoided or minimized by exploring all viable alternative project designs;
All adversely affected persons including those without title to land will be provided assistance to improve or
regain their living standards to the pre project levels;
Special attention will be paid for the improvement of living standards of marginalized and vulnerable
groups;
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 4
Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) will be prepared in close consultation with the affected families to ensure
their acceptability as well as timely delivery of entitlements and assistance;
If any person’s remaining land holding becomes operationally non viable, the entire holding will be
acquired and compensated accordingly, if the affected family desires. A similar approach will be adopted
for structures affected partially; and
Physical works will not commence on any portion of land before compensation and assistance to the
affected population have been provided in accordance with the policy framework.
2.2 Salient Features of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
Investigations and surveys carried out in connection with development projects such as transmission lines,
hydro-electric projects, seismic surveys, exploration for oil drilling etc. will not attract the provisions of the Act as
long as these surveys do not involve any clearing of forest or cutting of trees, and operations are restricted to
clearing of bushes and lopping of tree branches for purpose of sighting. If, however, investigations and surveys
involve clearing of forest area or felling of trees, prior permission of the Central Government is mandatory.
Notwithstanding the above, survey, investigation and exploration shall not be carried out in wildlife sanctuaries,
national parks and sample plots demarcated by the Forest Department without obtaining the prior approval of the
Central Government, whether or not felling of trees is involved.
The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 provides for the conservation of forests and regulating diversion of
forestlands for non-forestry purposes. When transmission projects fall within forestlands, prior clearance is
required from relevant authorities under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. State governments cannot de-
reserve any forestland or authorize its use for any non-forest purposes without approval from the Central
government. There are three steps of forest clearance for Transmission line.
(a) Route Alignment:
To achieve this, route selection of transmission lines is undertaken in close consultation with representatives from
the State Forest Departments and the Department of Revenue. Alterations are made to avoid environmentally
sensitive areas and settlements at execution stage.
(b) Right of Way (ROW):
Right of Way (ROW) width depends on the line voltage. A maximum width of ROW for transmission lines on forest
land and minimum clearances between conductors and trees to be adhered in route selection as specified in IS:
5613 and by the MOEF guidelines, which is given in Table 2.0.
Table 2.0: ROW Clearance Requirement between Conductors and Trees
Transmission Voltage (KV)
Max ROW (m)
Ground Clearance (m) Minimum Clearance between Conductors & Tops of Tree (m)
11 kV 7 2.75 2.6
33 kV 15 3.70 2.8
66 kV 18 4.00 3.4
110 kV 22 4.00 5.7
132 kV 27 4.60 4.0
220 kV 35 5.50 4.6
400 kV 52 7.30 5.5
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 5
MoEF guidelines are available in Annexure- VII of ESPP, September, 2008.
(c) Formulation of Forest Proposal:
After finalization of route-alignment and ROW width, and if the ROW passes through forest area, HVPNL will
submit the details in prescribed performa (Annexure-II of ESPP, September, 2008) to the respective Nodal
Officer (Forest) of State Government. Nodal Officer will forward the details to the concerned Divisional Forest
Officer (DFO) for formulation of forest proposal for processing of clearance under the Forest (Conservation)
Act, 1980. The DFO will then survey the relevant forest area required for the construction of transmission line
under the possible alternatives. The proposal will then be submitted to the State Forest Department and shall
be forwarded to the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (PCCF) in the state and finally to the State
Secretariat. The State Government will then recommend the proposal for further processing and approval to:-
1. Concerned Regional Office of the MoEF, if the area involved is 40 hectare or less
2. MoEF, New Delhi if the area is more than 40 hectare
Proposal involving diversion of forest land up to 1 ha: In such cases, no alternate non-forest land is to be
given by user agency. They are to deposit amount for compensatory afforestation equal to ten times the number
of trees likely to be felled. If the forest land involved is without trees amount for compensatory afforestation @
2500 plants per ha, will be deposited by the user agency.
Proposal involving diversion of forest land above 1 ha: In such case equivalent non forest land is also given
by the user agency for compensatory afforestation along with the amount for compensatory afforestation
The MoEF approves the proposal in two stages. In principle or first stage approval is accorded with certain
conditions depending upon the case. Second stage or final approval is accorded by the MoEF after receiving the
compliance report from State Government. The Forest approval procedure is given in Figure 2.0.
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 6
Figure 2.0: Procedure for obtaining forest clearance
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 7
Compensatory Afforestation:
(i) Compensatory afforestation is one of the most important conditions stipulated by the Central Government
while approving proposals for de-reservation or diversion of forest land for non-forest uses. It is essential that
with all such proposals, a comprehensive scheme for compensatory afforestation is formulated and submitted
to the Central Government.
(ii) The detailed compensatory afforestation scheme along with details of non-forest/degraded forest area
identified for compensatory afforestation, map, etc. is required to be submitted in the prescribed form.
Land for Compensatory Afforestation:
(i) Compensatory afforestation shall be done over equivalent area of non-forest land;
(ii) In the event that non-forest land of compensatory afforestation is not available in the same district, non-forest
land for compensatory afforestation may be identified anywhere else in the State/UT as near as possible to
the site of diversion, so as to minimise adverse impact on the micro-ecology of the area;
(iii) Where non-forest lands are not available or non-forest land is available in less extent to the forest area being
diverted, compensatory afforestation may be carried out over degraded forest twice in extent to the area
being diverted or to the difference between forest land being diverted and available non-forest land, as the
case may be;
(iv) The non-availability of non-forest land for compensatory afforestation would be accepted by the Central
Government only on the Certificate from the Chief Secretary to the State/UT Government to that effect; and
(v) The above compensatory afforestation may be raised over degraded forest land twice in extent of the forest
area being diverted/de-reserved in respect of laying of transmission lines up to 220 kV.
2.3 Salient Features of Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 is an umbrella legislation that provides a holistic framework for the
protection and improvement to the environment. Since the transmission line projects are non polluting in nature
and do not involve any disposal of solid waste, effluents and hazardous substances on land, air and water, so
limited requirements of Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 are applicable. However, the following Rules and
Regulations under the Environmental (Protection) Act, 1986 are applicable during operation of HVPNL.
(i) Batteries (Management and Handling) Rules, 2001;
(ii) Hazardous Wastes (Management and Handling) Amendment Rules, 2003; and
(iii) Ozone Depleting Substances (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000.
2.4 Other Applicable Statutory Clearances
Environmental clearance is not applicable to Power transmission projects as per EIA Notification, 2006 (and
amendments thereafter). The applicability of environmental and other relevant rules and acts has been assessed.
The Table 2.1 shows the clearances required during different stages of laying of transmission lines.
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 8
Table – 2.1: Clearance Requirements for Laying of Transmission Lines
Sl. No.
Activity Statute Requirement Competent Authority
Responsible Agency for Obtaining Clearance
Time Required
Pre-Construction Stage (Responsibility: HVPNL, Haryana)
1 Forest Clearance1
Forest Conservation Act 1980 & MoEF Letter Dt. 18.02.1998
Acquisition of forest land for transmission line passing through forest
Local Community, State and MoEF
HVPNL, Haryana 5-6 months
2 Tree cutting from non-forest area
Forest Conservation Act 1980 & MoEF Letter Dt. 18.02.1998
Permission for tree cutting due to proposed transmission line
Local Authority (DM/DC)
HVPNL, Haryana 2-3 months
Construction Stage (Responsibility: Contractor)
1 Engagement of labour
Labour Act Labour license Labour Commissioner
The Contractor 2-3 months
2.4.1 Declaration of Eco-Sensitive Zones by Haryana Government
Haryana Government vide its letter No. 1471-Ft-4-2007/3281 dated 6.3.2007 has submitted a proposal to Ministry
of Environment & Forests Government of India for declaration of eco-sensitive zones around all the National
parks & Wildlife Sanctuaries in the State as per Annexure-XI of ESPP. The notification of the eco-sensitive zone
prohibiting certain activities is yet to be issued by Government of India under Environment Protection Act.
National Parks include:
(iv) Kalesar National Park, Yamunanagar and
(v) Sultanpur National Park, Gurgaon.
Wildlife Sanctuaries includes:
(i) Bhihdawas Sanctuary, Jhajjar;
(ii) Nahar sanctuary, Rewari;
(iii) Chhilchhila Sanctuary, Kurukshetra;
(iv) Bir Shikargarh Sanctuary, Panchkula;
(v) Abubshehar Sanctuary, Sirsa;
(vi) Saraswati Sanctuary, Kaithal & Kurukshetra;
(vii) Khaparwas Sanctuary Jhajjar;
(viii) Bir Bara Ban, Jind;
(ix) Kalesar Sanctuary, Yamunanagar and
(x) Morni Sanctuary, Panchkula.
1 Forest Clearance for the subprojects under package G6 is not required as none of them passes through forest land
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 9
As per the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and rule 5 of the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986, the Central
Government prohibits the carrying on the process and operations, except with its prior permission, in relation to
Electrification (laying of new transmission lines) in specified area of Aravalli Range. (Refer Appendix 1)
None of the sub project under Package G6 is passing or close to above list.
2.5 Project Categorisation
Categorization of a project from environmental considerations is important to define the scope of further
environmental study. It needs to be undertaken as part of the project preparation.
2.5.1 Categorisation Criteria of MoEF
As per Section 4 of EIA Notification 2006 by MoEF, all projects and activities are broadly categorized in to two
catagories – Category A and Category B, based on the spatial extent of potential impacts on human health and
natural and manmade resources.
List of all such activities or projects are given in the Schedule (EIA Notification 2006) which shall require prior
environmental clearance from the Central Government in the MoEF on the recommendation of EAC constituted
by the Central Govt or from the State / Union territory Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA)
depending upon the categorization of projects as mentioned above.
N.B:- The aforementioned Schedule does not include activities or projects related to Electrification /
Transmission lines / Substations.
2.5.2 Categorisation Criteria of World Bank
2.5.2.1 World Bank OP- 4.01 on Environmental Assessment
The Bank undertakes environmental screening of each proposed project to determine the appropriate extent and
type of EA. The Bank classifies the proposed project into one of four categories, depending on the type, location,
sensitivity, and scale of the project and the nature and magnitude of its potential environmental impacts.
(a) Category A: A proposed project is classified as Category A if it is likely to have significant adverse
environmental impacts that are sensitive2, diverse, or unprecedented. These impacts may affect an area
broader than the sites or facilities subject to physical works. EA for a Category A project examines the
project's potential negative and positive environmental impacts, compares them with those of feasible
alternatives (including the "without project" situation), and recommends any measures needed to prevent,
minimize, mitigate, or compensate for adverse impacts and improve environmental performance. For a
Category A project, the borrower is responsible for preparing a report, normally an EIA (or a suitably
comprehensive regional or sectoral EA).
(b) Category B: A proposed project is classified as Category B if its potential adverse environmental impacts on
human populations or environmentally important areas--including wetlands, forests, grasslands, and other
natural habitats--are less adverse than those of Category A projects. These impacts are site-specific; few if
any of them are irreversible; and in most cases mitigatory measures can be designed more readily than for
2 A potential impact is considered "sensitive" if it may be irreversible (e.g., lead to loss of a major natural habitat) or raise issues
covered by OP 4.04, Natural Habitats; OP/BP 4.10, Indigenous Peoples; OP/BP 4.11, Physical Cultural Resources or OP 4.12, Involuntary Resettlement
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 10
Category A projects. The scope of EA for a Category B project may vary from project to project, but it is
narrower than that of Category A EA. Like Category A EA, it examines the project's potential negative and
positive environmental impacts and recommends any measures needed to prevent, minimize, mitigate, or
compensate for adverse impacts and improve environmental performance.
The findings and results of Category B EA are described in the project documentation (Project Appraisal
Document and Project Information Document)3.
(c) Category C: A proposed project is classified as Category C if it is likely to have minimal or no adverse environmental impacts.
Beyond screening, no further EA action is required for a Category C project.
(d) Category FI: A proposed project is classified as Category FI if it involves investment of Bank funds through a financial intermediary, in subprojects that may result in adverse environmental impacts.
2.5.2.2 World Bank OP- 4.36 on Forest
This policy applies to the following types of Bank-financed investment projects:
(a) projects that have or may have impacts on the health and quality of forests; (b) projects that affect the rights and welfare4 of people and their level of dependence upon or interaction with
forests; (c) projects that aim to bring about changes in the management, protection, or utilization of natural forests or
plantations, whether they are publicly, privately, or communally owned.
2.5.2.3 World Bank OP- 4.11 on Physical Cultural Resources
The following projects are classified during the environmental screening process as Category A or B, and are
subject to the provisions of this policy: (a) any project involving significant excavations, demolition, movement of
earth, flooding, or other environmental changes; and (b) any project located in, or in the vicinity of, a physical
cultural resources site recognized by the borrower. Projects specifically designed to support the management or
conservation of physical cultural resources are individually reviewed, and are normally classified as Category A or
B5.
2.5.2.4 World Bank OP- 4.04 on Natural Habitats
The OP 4.04 pertains to policies for conservation of natural habitats such as National Park, Sanctuaries, Game
Reserves, and Biosphere Zones. The bank does not support any project involving significant conversion of natural
habitats unless there are no feasible alternatives for the project and its siting.
3 When the screening process determines, or national legislation requires, that any of the environmental issues identified warrant
special attention, the findings and results of Category B EA may be set out in a separate report. Depending on the type of project and the nature and magnitude of the impacts, this report may include, for example, a limited environmental impact assessment, an environmental mitigation or management plan, an environmental audit, or a hazard assessment. For Category B projects that are not in environmentally sensitive areas and that present well-defined and well-understood issues of narrow scope, the Bank may accept alternative approaches for meeting EA requirements: for example, environmentally sound design criteria, siting criteria, or pollution standards for small-scale industrial plants or rural works; environmentally sound siting criteria, construction standards, or inspection procedures for housing projects; or environmentally sound operating procedures for road rehabilitation projects.
4 The rights and welfare of people affected by projects should be assessed in relation to the requirements and procedures of OP 4.10, Indigenous Peoples, OP 4.11, Physical Cultural Resources, and OP 4.12, Involuntary Resettlement.
5 For definitions of project categories A and B, see OP 4.01, Environmental Assessment, paragraph 8
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 11
3.0 PROJECT SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY
3.1 Project Categorisation as per MoEF and World Bank
As per MoEF EIA Notification, dated 14th September 2006 and subsequent Amendments of EIA Notification,
dated 19th January 2009, the proposed project does not fall under any of the Categories. Therefore, the project
would not require prior environmental clearance from MoEF.
As per Topographical Sheet and site verification by a team of Environmental and Social Experts, none of the
following have been found throughout the project area:
Environmentally important areas such as
(i) Protected Areas notified under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972,
(ii) Critically Polluted areas as notified by the Central Pollution Control Board from time to time,
(iii) Notified Eco-sensitive areas,
(iv) Inter-State boundaries and international boundaries
Human habitation
Therefore, it does not fall under Category A as per the World Bank (OP 4.01). During construction, there might be
minimal impact on environment for the short run and there will be significant and permanent change in the land
use pattern of the proposed land for the sub projects. Hence, the proposed project has been considered as
Category B project.
Hence, none of the sub-projects under Package G5 require detailed EIA study. Therefore, EMP has been
prepared with limited environmental analysis in accordance with World Bank’s Operational Policies (OP) and
Government of India Guidelines.
3.2 Scope of the Study
Comparison among candidate location for tower erection for proposed transmission lines based on criteria in
ESPP
Assessment of direct and indirect impacts due to the project;
Assessment of magnitude of impact on landuse throughout the proposed alignment;
Recommendation of the most suitable alignment;
Formulation of mitigation measures for the adverse impacts in line with ESPP
Recommendation of the environmental enhancement measures (e.g. tree plantations)
Quantification of works required to be executed (e.g. compensatory plantation through Forest Department);
To conduct adequate public consultation and the recommendations arising thereon.
3.3 Methodology
The methodology used for preparation of EMP is based on the MoEF’s EIA Notification, dated 14th September
2006, World Bank’s OP and GoI Guidelines.
The project was carried out through various defined activities as detailed in this section of the report. The
methodology adopted includes the following work plan:
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 12
Activity 1: Kick-off Meeting with Superintending Engineer & Other Divisional Officers, HVPNL
A kick-off meeting of the Environmental Expert and the Social Expert of SMEC has been held with the
Superintending Engineer & Other Divisional Officers, HVPNL, Panchkula, Karnal, Hisar, Faridabad, Gurgaon,
Circles on 19th, 20th, 24th, 27thFebruary, 2009 respectively to discuss the following:
(a) Walkover survey carried out by HVPNL;
(b) Route of proposed Transmission lines
(c) Site visit schedule and related activities for the same.
Activity 2: Collection of Relevant Information Available for the Proposed Sub Projects
Relevant information/ data collected prior to site visits included:
Relevant Topographical Sheets of the proposed alignment;
Walkover survey wherever available; and
Information regarding various other alternatives in each case.
Activity 3: Conduction of Site Visits and Consultations (Two levels – Institutional and Community/ Public
Level)
Proposed Transmission lines as indicated in Table 5.0 were visited to conduct a thorough site appreciation and
understanding of key environmental features and issues involved at the site. In addition, public consultations at
the nearby villages at Panchayat level and also at villager level have been carried out using “Focused Group
Discussion” method.
Activity 4: Preparation of EMP
Based on the information collected via stakeholder consultation, site visits and public consultations, an EMP has
been developed.
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 13
4.0 PROJECT BASELINE ENVIRONMENT
This chapter documents the major findings of the baseline conditions that have been used to formulate the EMP
including the mitigation and enhancement measures. Since the baseline environmental scenario is more or less
consistent in the state, hence the following sections provide an environmental setting for the state of Haryana.
4.1 Meteorology
Haryana lies in the arid and semiarid zone of north-westem India. Temperatures range from 500 C in summer to
near 00 C in winter with an average of 230 C year round. Rainfall is highly seasonal (semi-arid monsoon) with
considerable (20-40%) annual variation in total amount. Total rainfall varies from under 400 mm in the south-
westem portions of the State which borders the desert of Rajasthan to over 1000 mm on the piedmont fan in the
north-east. Typical rainfall distribution in Haryana is shown in Figure 4.0. Most (70-80%) of the precipitation
comes within the summer monsoon season (July-August). Although November is the driest month, significant
rainfall also occurs in the winter (December and January).
Figure 4.0.: Typical rainfall distribution in Haryana
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 14
4.2 Physical Environment
4.2.1 Land Resources
Haryana State lies on the Yamuna-Ghaggar plane extending south-west from the Shivalik Hills at the base of the
Himalayas to the remnants of the Aravali Hills near Narnaul. Principal landforms in Haryana are shown in Figure
4.1. The plain slopes vary gradually to the south-west, rising gradually again in the vicinity of the Aravali Hills.
Most of the plain areas fall between 200m, in the south, to 365 m above medium sea level (MSL) at the base of
the Shivalik Hills (Singh 1995). Khadar, or flood plain areas are present along the Yamuna River and the Ghaggar
River beds. These areas are flooded annually during the monsoon season. A nearly flat alluvial plain covers large
areas of the central portion of the State.
Slight elevational relief is provided by former beds of ancient streams and recently constructed irrigation canals.
This plain rises slightly in the south as alluvium gives way to sand dunes. The Himalayan foothills terminate
abruptly on the plain along the northem border of the State. Scattered along the southem border, the Aravali Hills
are intensively eroded remnants of four ancient isolated hill ranges. Rock outcroppings from Namaul to Delhi are
the remains of these ranges. Sand dunes are present in the extreme south and south-west which make this area
difficult to irrigate. Heavy over-grazing by livestock occurs on the dunes particularly during drought years when an
influx of herds from even drier regions to the south-west occurs. Consequently these dunes are often unstable
and easily wind borne.
Basic soil associations in Haryana are shown in Figure 4.2. Alluvial soils of the piedmont outwash plains of
northern Haryana are highly variable, ranging from predominantly stones and gravel to sandy or clayey. Areas
with high clay content are often utilized in the manufacture of bricks and building blocks. The alignment from
Panchkula to Shahabad, traverses such a region. Further away from the Shivalik Hills, the soils are sandy loams
and clay, formed of river alluvium, and tend to be deficient in nitrogen, phosphorus and potash. Khadar areas,
which are annually renewed by flood sediments, are more nutrient rich and require less intensive fertilization.
Throughout the region, saline deposits and calcium carbonate layers cause localized farming problems. Mineral
resources of the plains region are limited (Gupta 1990). Small deposits of iron ore are present in the Aravali tract
near arnaul. Limestone which occurs near Ambala and Surajpur, and kankar at Bhiwani and Rohtak is the basis
for local cement manufacturing operations. Slate is mined from outcroppings near Rewari. Clay is widely used
throughout the State in the production of bricks, except for sand dune dominated areas. In the Gurgoan district
some clay of superior quality is used in the production of china.
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 15
Figure 4.1.: Principal landforms in Haryana Figure 4.2.: Basic soil associations in Haryana
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 16
4.2.2 Ambient Air Quality
Air Quality is generally good throughout the region although dust storms induced by thermal conditions and
bare soils occur frequently. In local communities dust/ particulate matter pollution may be high when traffic
volume or speeds are high and unpaved bemns are used as the travel lane. Other air quality parameters are
generally well below pollution standards. Table 4.0 gives the ambient air quality in sample locations in the State
of Haryana.
Table 4.0: Ambient Air Quality in Sample Locations in the State of Haryana
Parameter City Location Type of Area
Average (µg/m3)
Std Deviation
n Air quality
% vio
SOx Faridabad Shivalik Global Industries I 12 2 97 L 0
Regional Office R 10 2 126 L 0
Yamuna Nagar Ballarpur Industries I 17 3 52 L 0
Hisar Urban Estate II R 9 1 86 L 0
Guru Jambehswar Univ. R 8 2 94 L 0
NOx Faridabad Shivalik Global Industries I 23 3 97 L 0
Regional Office R 22 3 126 L 0
Yamuna Nagar Ballarpur Industries I 31 6 52 L 0
Hisar Urban Estate II R BDL 1 86 L 0
Guru Jambehswar Univ. R BDL 2 93 L 0
RSPM Faridabad Shivalik Global Industries I 173 11 97 H 97
Regional Office R 154 15 126 C 99
Yamuna Nagar Ballarpur Industries I 137 49 57 H 40
Hisar Urban Estate II R 187 96 97 C 75
Guru Jambehswar Univ. R 93 29 94 C 38
SPM Faridabad Shivalik Global Industries I 409 23 96 H 0
Regional Office R 353 47 125 C 99
Yamuna Nagar Ballarpur Industries I 230 77 57 M 0
Hisar Urban Estate II R 248 123 97 C 63
Guru Jambehswar Univ. R 164 51 94H H 20
(Source: http://www.cpcb.nic.in/Data-2006_air.php)
4.2.3 Water Resources
The Yamuna River which forms part of Haryana's eastem boundary is the only perennial river in the region. The
Ghaggar River has disappearing flows unless swollen by the monsoon. From November to June the riverbed is
planted in Hisar and Sirsa districts. The Markanda, Saraswati, Tangri, Chautang, and Rakshi Rivers, which
originate as drainage flowing south-west from the Shivalik Hills and the Kasauli, Indori, Krishmavati, Landoha,
Badshapur Nallah and Sahibi River which flow north from the Mewat Hills before disappearing from the plains
are all intermittent flowing streams. During the monsoon season, however, substantial portions of the region are
subject to flooding.
The depth of the groundwater table throughout much of the region generally ranges from 3 to 9 m below the
surface. In the south, particularly in the vicinity of Hisar and Jind, groundwater occurs at greater depths.
Groundwater supplies are frequently brackish. Regional groundwater movement generally coincides with
surface topography and is from north-east to south-west in most of the State except in the southern portion
where it is south to north. Irrigation canals and road alignments often cause localised water logging conditions
within the study area (Singh 1995). High ground water levels (i. e. within 2 m of the surface) generate Kankar
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 17
formation through capillary transport of water to the surface where it evaporates leaving behind salts. The
groundwater table tends to be higher in Ambala, Karnal, Kurukshetra, Sonepat, and Rohtak districts where it
often averages 3 m (Chib 1977) in depth and Kankar deposits are conmmonI.n Mahendragrah, Bhiwani, Hisar,
Jind and Sirsa groundwater is generally found from 10 m to as much as 50 m depth. Intensive canal irrigation in
shallow groundwater areas raises the water table to a level where Kankar forrnation can occur rendering the
soil unsuitable for cultivation.
4.2.4 Noise Environment
Noise levels are generally low, except in urban areas where horn blowing, a fixture of Indians drivers, are
applied liberally by most motorists.
4.3 Biological Environment
4.3.1 Flora
Haryana State lies at the meeting point of three vegetative zones: the westem Himalayas to the north, the
upper Gangetic Plains to the east, and West Indian Desert or Arid Zone which encompasses most of the State
(MP Singh et al. 1994). The original natural vegetation of the region was tropical thom forest in arid areas and
tropical dry deciduous forest in moister north-eastem sections (Agarwala 1990).Today the forest area has been
reduced to 1703 sq. km (3.85% of the total land area). This is the lowest percent forest cover of any state in
India outside of Delhi. Nearly 94 percent of this forest area falls within reserves or has protected status. The
majority of the growing stock is located in the north-eastem part of the State. Eucalyptus, because of its rapid
growth rate and tolerance of semiarid conditions, has been planted along various roads.
Other species commonly planted include Shisham, Kiker Cassia Festuty, Pongamia and Jaman. Similar
plantings are present along highways in southern and westem parts of the State, although, because of the arid
conditions, Acacias, Mesquite and Tarnarix replace Eucalyptus, Pongamia and Jaman.
4.3.2 Fauna
Various species of mammals, birds and reptiles are found in the state. Commonly observed faunal species in
project areas have been enlisted in respective sub project details in Chapter 5, all species being highly tolerant
of human activities.
No rare, threatened or endangered species of wildlife are known to occur on or near the project locations.
4.4 Socio Economic Environment
A brief of socio-economic profile of the state (in comparison to statistics of the country) is given in Table 4.1.
Table 4.1: Socio-Economic Profile of Haryana
Sl. No. Item Haryana India
1. Total population (Census 2001) (in millions) 21.14 1028.61
2. Decadal Growth (Census 2001) (%) 28.43 21.54
3. Crude Birth Rate (SRS 2007) 23.4 23.1
4. Crude Death Rate (SRS 2007) 6.6 7.4
5. Total Fertility Rate (NFHS-III) 2.7 2.7
6. Infant Mortality Rate (SRS 2007) 55 55
7. Maternal Mortality Ratio (SRS 2001 - 2003) 162 301
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 18
Sl. No. Item Haryana India
8. Sex Ratio (Census 2001) 861 933
9. Population below Poverty line (%) 8.74 26.10
10. Schedule Caste population (in millions) 4.09 166.64
11. Schedule Tribe population (in millions) 0 84.33
12. Female Literacy Rate (Census 2001) (%) 55.7 53.7
http://mohfw.nic.in/NRHM/State%20Files/haryana.htm#sp)
However, the detailed socio-economic profile of each of the districts falling within Project scope is presented in
respective RRAP reports.
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 19
5.0 DESCRIPTION OF SUB PROJECTS
5.1 The Sub Projects
The project under Package G-6 Transmission lines of Hisar, Faridabad, Panchkula, Gurgaon and Karnal
Circles is given in Table 5.0. Tentative locations for all the subprojects are shown on District Planning Maps
(where available) and are given in Annexure I.
Table 5.0: Length of Transmission lines under Package G-6
S. No.
Name of Transmission line Name of the TS Circle / Division
Length of line (in Km.)
as per contract
Revised Length of line (in Km.)
as per site Walkover survey
No. of towers footed
1 220 KV D/C Sector -72 Gurgaon to Rangala Rajpur (Firozpur-Zirka) line with 0.5 Sq..inch ACSR (Moose) via Nuh
Faridabad / Palwal 80 80 289
2 Const. of 220 KV D/C Line with “ACSR (Moose) from proposed 400 KV substation Nawada (Faridabad) to 220 KV sub-station A-5 Faridabad
Faridabad / Faridabad 6 5.64 39
3 LILO of both circuits of existing 220 KV D/C 400 KV Mayar (PGCIL Hisar) S/Stn to Isherwal S/stn at 220 KV S/Stn Sangwan (Tosham) with 0.4 sqm “ACSR (Zebra) 2 x 20 = 40km
Hisar / Bhiwani
40 40 58
4 220 KV D/C line from 400 KV S/Stn PKL to 220 KV S/Stn Rawail (Panchkula) with 0.5 Sq.inch ACSR (Moose)
Panchkula / Panchkula 15 13.2 58
5 LILO of one circuit of 220 KV D/C Panchkula – Tapla line at 220 KV S/Stn Raiwali (Panchkula) with 0.4 sq. ACSR (Zebra)
Panchkula / Panchkula 10 4.5 17
6 LILO of 132 KV Isherwal – Jui S/C line at 132 KV sub-station Kairu (Bhiwani) with ACSR (Painther)
Hisar / Bhiwani 5 4.2 15
7 Const. of 132 KV S/C line on D/C tower with 0.4 sq. “ACSR (Zebra) from 220 KV Dhanonda to proposed 132 KV substation Nangal Mohanpur (Mohindergarh)
Gurgaon / Rewari
10 11.26 36
8 Const. of 132 KV S/C line on D/C tower with 0.4 sq “ACSR(Zebra) from 220 kv Dhanonda to proposed 132 KV Sub-station Pali (Gurgaon)
Gurgaon / Rewari 10 13.515 43
9 LILO of 132 KV S/C Hansi-Narnaud line at Masudpur (Hansi) with 0.2 Sq.inch “ACSR (Painther)
Hisar / Hisar 15 13.620 46
10 LILO of one circuit of 132 KV D/C PTPS – Chandauli line at 132 KV S/stn Kabri (Panipat) with 0.2 Sq.inch “ACSR (Painther)
Karnal / Panipat 3 2.305 10
Total 194 188.24 611
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 20
5.1.1 Sub-Project 1 - 220 kV D/C Sector 72, Gurgaon to Rangla Rajpur (Firozpur Zirka) line
The Transmission Line is proposed with 220 kV D/C Sector 72, Gurgaon to Rangla Rajpur (Firozpur Zirka) line with 0.6 sq. inch ACSR (Moose) via Nuh.
The total length of the Transmission Line was 80 km as per the contract and so as per walkover survey. Following are the existing features along the
proposed transmission line:
Table 5.1 : Assessment of Alternatives for Sub project 1
Sl. No.
Parameters Features along Alternative 1 Features along Alternative 2 Comparative Statement in favour of Chosen Alternative-2
1. Required ROW for Transmission Line
35m 35m Alternative 2 was chosen as against Alternative 1 because of the following reason-
A section of alignment opted in Alternative 1 passes through Aravalli hills (near Iqlimpur village). As per MoEF Notifications under Environment Protection) Act, 1986 and Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 “Electrification (laying of new transmission lines)” is prohibited (except with its prior permission). (Refer Appendix 1)
Alternative 2 on the other hand avoids Aravalli hills (eco-sensitive area) and passes mostly through agricultural area hence justified.
2. Name of the nearest Villages along the Transmission Line
Firozpur Zirkha, Sakras, Kherli khurd, Siswana Jatka, Mandikheda, Mandkoli, Aterna Shamsabad, Bhadas, Marhi, Ganduri, Gohna, Dihana, Malab, Nizampur, Adbat, salaheri, Frozpur Namak, salamba, Ghasera, Hiranthala, Chapra, Rewasan, Kherli Kankar, Badelki, Barauta, Ata, Jokapur, Lakhuwas, khaika, Berka, Ghadi Bazidpur, Mehandwara, Iqlimpur, Sector 72(Gurgaon)
Firozpur Zirkha, Sakras, Kherli khurd, Siswana Jatka, Mandikheda, Mandkoli, Aterna Shamsabad, Bhadas, Marhi, Ganduri, Gohna, Dihana, Malab, Nizampur, Adbat, salaheri, Frozpur Namak, salamba, Ghasera, Hiranthala, Chapra, Rewasan, Kherli Kankar, Badelki, Barauta, Ata, Jokapur, Lakhuwas, khaika, Berka, Ghadi Bazidpur, Mehandwara, Badshahpur, Badashapur village (Jain Farm House) , Sector 72(Gurgaon)
3. Terrain Plain and Hilly Plain
4. Existing Landuse Primarily agricultural field and small patch of plantations on hills
Primarily agricultural field
5. Type of existing vegetation
Seasonal crops such as Mustard, wheat etc
Seasonal crops such as Mustard, wheat etc
6. NH Crossing / Nearby nil nil
7. Metal Road Crossing / PWD Road Crossing
9 PWD roads and one proposed Manesar-Palwal expressway
9 PWD roads and one proposed Manesar-Palwal expressway
8. Railway Crossing Nil Nil
9. Nearby River or Surface water/ Canal Crossing
Gurgaon Canal, few distributaries, Kotla Drain and Umra Minor
Gurgaon Canal, few distributaries, Kotla Drain and Umra Minor
10. Crossing of Transmission Line
Five 6kV lines, Three 220kV lines, two 400kV lines, one 560kV line and three sectional towers
Five 6kV lines, Three 220kV lines, two 400kV lines, one 560kV line and three sectional towers
11. No. of Affected person Described in RRAP report Described in RRAP report
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 21
Sl. No.
Parameters Features along Alternative 1 Features along Alternative 2 Comparative Statement in favour of Chosen Alternative-2
12. Tree/ Crop and its extent of damage
Few trees of Safeda and Kikar Few trees of Safeda and Kikar
13. Forest involvement Yes, for tree cutting only (if any) Yes, for tree cutting only (if any)
14. Concerned Forest Department for necessary approval
DFO, Mewat District and Gurgaon District DFO, Mewat District and Gurgaon District
15. Type of Common Flora & Fauna
Common flora- Babul, Kikar, Neem,
Safeda, Pipal, etc
Common fauna- monkey, domestic
animals like dogs, buffalo, cow, goats,
common rodents, common reptiles, etc
Common avifauna- Birds like Eagle, sparrow, crow, Pigeons, Common ducks, Common geese, White Breasted Kingfisher
Common flora- Babul, Kikar, Neem, Safeda,
Pipal, etc
Common fauna- monkey, domestic animals like
dogs, buffalo, cow, goats, common rodents,
common reptiles, etc
Common avifauna- Birds like Eagle, sparrow, crow, Pigeons, Common ducks, Common geese, White Breasted Kingfisher
16. Endangered Species, if any
Nil Nil
17. Historical/ Cultural monuments
Nil Nil
18. Details of Tribal area if any
Nil Nil
The existing condition of the project site along the proposed Transmission Line is shown by photographs in Annexure II. The Transmission Line is also
marked on the Topographical Sheet, which is given in Annexure III.
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 22
5.1.2 Sub-Project -2 220 kV D/C line from proposed 400 KV substation Nawada (Faridabad) to 220 KV sub station A-6 Faridabad
The Transmission Line is proposed with 220 kV D/C line with 0.5 sq. inch ACSR (Moose) from proposed 400 kV substation Nawada (Faridabad) to 220
kV sub stationA-6 Faridabad. The total length of the Transmission Line was 6 km as per the contract, where as the actual length as per walkover survey
is 5.640 km as per walkover survey. Following are the existing features along the proposed transmission line:
Table 5.2: Assessment of Alternatives for Sub Project 2
Sl. No.
Parameters Features along Alternative 1
(straight line) Features along Alternative 2
(Finalised Alternative) Comparative Statement in favour of chosen alternative
1. Required ROW for Transmission Line
35m 35m Alternative 2 was chosen as against Alternative 1 because of the following reasons- a) Alternative 1 crosses builtup area as well as Industrial area (NTPC Complex), whereas alternative 2 passes through HUDA green belt6; hence justified. b) Alternative 1 crosses dense plantations of babul, whereas Alternative 2 avoids the same, hence justified
2. Name of the nearest Villages and other settlements along the Transmission Line
Mujeri Village and NTPC Complex Mujeri Village and few sectors of Faridabad
3. Terrain Plain Plain
4. Landuse Plantations, builtup area, and agricultural area
Existing and Proposed Green belt of HUDA
5. Type of existing vegetation Dense babul, crops like vegetables, lentils, wheat, mustard etc
Crops like vegetables, lentils, wheat, mustard etc
6. NH Crossing / Nearby Nil Nil
7. Metal Road Crossing / PWD Road Crossing
Two PWD roads One PWD crossing
8. Railway Crossing Nil Nil
9. Nearby River or Surface water/ Canal Crossing
Agra Canal, Rampur Distributary, Ballabhgarh Distributary
Agra Canal, Rampur Distributary, Ballabhgarh Distributary
10. Crossing of Transmission Line
Three existing 220kV lines, one proposed 220kV line, one existing 400kV line
One existing 66kV line, three existing 220kV lines, one proposed 220kV line, one existing 400kV line
11. No. of Affected person Described in RRAP report Described in RRAP report
12. Tree/ Crop and its extent of damage
Dense plantations of Babul Minor Shrubs, local grass etc
6 At present, HUDA green belt exists parallel to Agra Canal and is proposed along the proposed road passing through agricultural field of Mujeri Village, for which
land has already been acquired by HUDA
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 23
Sl. No.
Parameters Features along Alternative 1
(straight line) Features along Alternative 2
(Finalised Alternative) Comparative Statement in favour of chosen alternative
13. Forest involvement Nil Nil
14. Concerned Forest Department for necessary approval
DFO, Faridabad District, Haryana DFO, Faridabad District, Haryana
15. Type of Common Flora & Fauna
Common flora- Babul, Kikar, Neem, Safeda,
Pipal, etc
Common fauna- monkey, domestic animals
like dogs, buffalo, cow, goats, common
rodents, common reptiles, etc
Common avifauna- Birds like Eagle, sparrow, crow, Pigeons, Common ducks, Common geese, White Breasted Kingfisher
Common flora- Kikar, Neem, Safeda, Pipal,
etc
Common fauna- monkey, domestic animals
like dogs, buffalo, cow, goats, common
rodents, common reptiles, etc
Common avifauna- Birds like Eagle, sparrow, crow, Pigeons, Common ducks, Common geese, White Breasted Kingfisher
16. Endangered Species, if any Nil Nil
17. Historical/ Cultural monuments
Nil Nil
18. Details of Tribal area if any Nil Nil
The existing condition of the project site along the proposed Transmission Line is shown by photographs in Annexure II. The Transmission Line is also
marked on the Topographical Sheet, which is given in Annexure III.
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 24
5.1.3 Sub-Project 3 - LILO of both circuits of existing 220 KV D/C 400 KV Mayar (PGCIL Hisar) S/Stn to Isherwal S/Stn at 220 KV S/Stn
Sangwan (Tosham)
The Transmission Line is proposed with LILO of both circuits of existing 220 KV D/C 400 KV Mayar (PGCIL Hisar) S/Stn to Isherwal S/Stn at 220 KV
S/Stn Sangwan (Tosham) with 0.4 sq. inch ACSR (Zebra). The total length of the Transmission Line as per the contract is 40 km. Following are the
existing features along the proposed transmission line:
Table 5.3: Assessment of Alternatives for Sub Project 3
Sl. No.
Parameters Features along Alternative 1 (Finalised alternative)
Features along Alternative 2 (Straight Line)
Comparative Statement in favour of chosen alternative-1
1. Required ROW for Transmission Line
35 m Same as Alternate 1 Alternative 1 was chosen as against Alternative 2 because of the following reason-
Alternate 1 will not affect any of the villages mentioned
Alternate 2 on the other hand will affect major settlements at 3 villages and so it has been avoided.
2. Name of the nearest Villages along the Transmission Line
Majahadpur, Ratera, Gurkhana Johra, Kirawar, Jaran ki Chhan, Alakpura, Sagwan
Affected villages (3 nos.) - Majahadpur, Kirawar and Alakpura,
3. Terrain
Plain Same as Alternate 1
4. Existing Landuse
Mainly agricultural land Agricultural land, Settlement
5. Type of existing vegetation
Mustard, Wheat, Grains, Vegetables, Fruits Same as Alternate 1
6. NH Crossing / Nearby
Nil Nil
7. Metal Road Crossing / PWD Road Crossing
1 crossing near Majahadpur, 2 crossings near Ratera, 2 crossings near Kirawar, 1 crossing between Jaran ki Chhan and Alakpura, 2 crossings between Alakpura and Sagwan
Same as Alternate 1
8. Railway Crossing
Nil
9. Nearby River or Surface water/ Canal Crossing
Khanak minor canal crossing near Gurkhana Johra, Bhurtana minor canal crossing between Jaran ki Chhan and Alakpura, Baliyali minor crossing near Sagwan
Same as Alternate 1
10. Crossing of Transmission Line
Power line crossing near village Majahadpur Same as Alternate 1
11. No. of Affected person
Described in RRAP Report Same as Alternate 1
12. Tree/ Crop and its extent of Few numbers of trees has been observed Same as Alternate 1
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 25
Sl. No.
Parameters Features along Alternative 1 (Finalised alternative)
Features along Alternative 2 (Straight Line)
Comparative Statement in favour of chosen alternative-1
damage along the road where the proposed Transmission Line is crossing. The exact number of trees will be counted at the time of detailed survey. The permission for cutting / lopping of trees will be taken from State Forest Department before construction stage.
13. Forest involvement Nil Nil
14. Concerned Forest Department for necessary approval
District Forest Office, Hisar & Bhiwani Districts, Haryana
Same as Alternate 1
15. Type of Common Flora & Fauna
Common flora - Kikar, Imli, Sisam, Pipal, Neem etc. Common fauna- monkey, domestic animals like dogs, buffalo, cow, goats, common rodents, common reptiles, etc Common avifauna- Birds like Eagle, sparrow, crow, Pigeons, Common ducks, Common geese etc
Same as Alternate 1
16. Endangered Species, if any Nil Nil
17. Historical/ Cultural monuments Nil Nil
18. Details of Tribal area if any Nil Nil
19. District/ State Boundary if any Hisar and Bhiwani District Boundary Same as Alternate 1
The existing condition of the project site along the proposed Transmission Line is shown by photographs in Annexure II. The Transmission Line is also
marked on the Topographical Sheet, which is given in Annexure III.
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 26
5.1.4 Sub-Project 4- 220 kV D/C line with 400 KV S/Stn PKL to 220 KV S/Stn Raiwalli (Panchkula)
The Transmission Line is proposed with 220 kV D/C line with 400 KV S/Stn PKL to 220 KV S/Stn Raiwall (Panchkula) with 0.5 sq. inch ACSR (Moose).
The total length of the Transmission Line as per the contract is 15 km, where as the actual length as per walkover survey is 13.2 km. Following are the
existing features along the proposed transmission line:
Table 5.4: Assessment of Alternatives for Sub Project 4
Sl. No.
Parameters Features along Alternative 1 (Finalised Alternative)
Features along Alternative 2 (Straight line alternative)
Comparative Statement in favour of chosen alternative-1
1. Required ROW for Transmission Line
35 m 35 m Alternative 1 was chosen as against Alternative 2 because of the following reason- Alternative 1 passes through less habitated areas as compared to Alternative 2, and runs mainly through agricultural fields. It is estimated that Alternative 1 will tentatively have less number of affected persons since it does not pass through any densely habitated areas and the alignment avoids all existing structures/ habitation of any kind.
2. Name of the nearest Villages along the Transmission Line
Naggal, Barwala, Bataud, Naya Gaon, Raiwalli Naggal, Barwala, Bhagwanpur, Haripur, Raiwalli
3. Terrain Plain Plain
4. Existing Landuse Mainly Agricultural Land, some parts water logged
Mainly Agricultural Land, some parts under habitation in route of the line
5. Type of existing vegetation
Mango, Neem, Eucalyptus, Keekar, Local Shrubs and various agricultural crops like Wheat, Paddy and Fodder crops.
Mango, Neem, Eucalyptus, Keekar, Local Shrubs and various agricultural crops like Wheat, Paddy and Fodder crops.
6. NH Crossing / Nearby State Road-73 Crossing State Road-73 Crossing
7. Metal Road Crossing / PWD Road Crossing
Crossing of Metalled village road going to Raiwalli
Crossing of Metalled village road going to Raiwalli
8. Railway Crossing Nil Nil
9. Nearby River or Surface water/ Canal Crossing
Dangri River at about one Km running parallel to the initial stretch of the transmission line from Naggal to Naya Gaon
Dangri River at about 2 Km running parallel to the entire stretch of the transmission line
10. Crossing of Transmission Line
Crossings of the following lines: Barwala – RaipurRani 66kV line Double Circuit 66 kV Barwala Shahzadpur line 220 kV Madanpur- Tepla Line.
Crossings of the following lines: Barwala – RaipurRani 66kV line Double Circuit 66 kV Barwala Shahzadpur line 220 kV Madanpur- Tepla Line.
11. No. of Affected person Described in RRAP Report. More than the selected alignment since
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 27
Sl. No.
Parameters Features along Alternative 1 (Finalised Alternative)
Features along Alternative 2 (Straight line alternative)
Comparative Statement in favour of chosen alternative-1
Alternative 2 passes through many thickly habitated areas.
12. Tree/ Crop and its extent of damage
The transmission line passes mainly through agricultural patch. However, there are random patches of Keekar/ Eucalyptus plantation in between the agricultural fields. HVPNL officials informed that an estimate of 2500 trees will need to be cut on the entire stretch of the transmission line for the required ROW.
Same as Alternative 1
13. Forest involvement The proposed transmission line crosses through the metalled road adjacent to the proposed Raiwalli sub station site, which is at present lined by single row of Eucalyptus trees under PWD plantation. It is estimated that around 10- 20 eucalyptus trees will need to be cut for the same.
Same as Alternative 1
14. Concerned Forest Department for necessary approval
Ambala Forest Division, Ambala Range. Same as Alternative 1
15. Type of Common Flora & Fauna
Common flora- Mango, Neem, Eucalyptus, Keekar, Local Shrubs and various agricultural crops like Wheat, Paddy and Fodder crops. Common fauna- monkey, domestic animals like dogs, buffalo, cow, goats, common rodents, common reptiles, etc Common avifauna- Birds like Eagle, sparrow, crow, Pigeons, Common ducks, Common geese etc
Common flora- Mango, Neem, Eucalyptus, Keekar, Local Shrubs and various agricultural crops like Wheat, Paddy and Fodder crops. Common fauna- monkey, domestic animals like dogs, buffalo, cow, goats, common rodents, common reptiles, etc Common avifauna- Birds like Eagle, sparrow, crow, Pigeons, Common ducks, Common geese etc
16. Endangered Species, if any
Nil Nil
17. Historical/ Cultural monuments
Nil Nil
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 28
Sl. No.
Parameters Features along Alternative 1 (Finalised Alternative)
Features along Alternative 2 (Straight line alternative)
Comparative Statement in favour of chosen alternative-1
18. Details of Tribal area if any
Nil Nil
The existing condition of the project site along the proposed Transmission Line is shown by photographs in Annexure II. The Transmission Line is also
marked on the Topographical Sheet, which is given in Annexure III.
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 29
5.1.5 Sub-Project 5 - LILO of one circuit of 220 KV Panchkula- Tepla Line at 220 KV S/Stn Raiwali (Panchkula)
The Transmission Line is proposed with LILO of one circuit of 220 KV Panchkula- Tepla Line at 220 KV S/Stn Raiwali (Panchkula) with 0.4 sq. inch
ACSR (Zebra). The total length of the Transmission Line as per the contract is 10 km, where as the actual length as per walkover survey is 4.5 km.
Following are the existing features along the proposed transmission line:
Table 5.5: Assessment of Alternatives for Sub project 5
Sl. No.
Parameters Features along Alternative 1 (Finalised Alternative)
Features along Alternative 2 (Straight line alternative)
Comparative Statement in favour of chosen alternative
1. Required ROW for Transmission Line
35 m Same as Alternative 1 Alternative 1 was chosen as against Alternative 2 because of the following reason- Alternative 1 passes through less habitated areas as compared to Alternative 2, and runs mainly through agricultural fields. It is estimated that Alternative 1 will tentatively have less number of affected persons since it does not pass through any densely habitated areas and the alignment avoids all existing structures/ habitation of any kind. -
2. Name of the nearest Villages along the Transmission Line
Naya Gaon, Raiwalli Naya Gaon, Ganni Khera, Ghazipur, Raiwalli
3. Terrain
Plain Same as Alternative 1
4. Existing Landuse
Mainly Agricultural Land Mainly agricultural land, some parts under habitation
5. Type of existing vegetation
Mango, Neem, Eucalyptus, Keekar, Local Shrubs and various agricultural crops like Wheat, Paddy and Fodder crops.
Mango, Neem, Eucalyptus, Keekar, Local Shrubs and various agricultural crops like Wheat, Paddy and Fodder crops.
6. NH Crossing / Nearby
nil nil
7. Metal Road Crossing / PWD Road Crossing
Crossing of Metalled village road going to Raiwalli Same as Alternative 1
8. Railway Crossing
Nil Nil
9. Nearby River or Surface water/ Canal Crossing
River Dangri Nadi at about one Km from the transmission line
Alternative 2 will run closer to the river bed.
10. Crossing of Transmission Line
Nil Nil
11. No. of Affected person
Described in RRAP Report. More than the selected alignment since Alternative 2 passes through many thickly habitated areas.
12. Tree/ Crop and its extent of damage
The transmission line passes mainly through agricultural patch. However, there are random
Same as Alternative 1
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 30
Sl. No.
Parameters Features along Alternative 1 (Finalised Alternative)
Features along Alternative 2 (Straight line alternative)
Comparative Statement in favour of chosen alternative
patches of Keekar/ Eucalyptus plantation in between the agricultural fields. HVPNL officials informed that an estimate of 500 trees will need to be cut on the entire stretch of the transmission line for the required ROW.
13. Forest involvement The proposed transmission line crosses through the metalled road adjacent to the proposed Raiwalli sub station site, which is at present lined by single row of Eucalyptus trees under PWD plantation. It is estimated that around 10- 20 eucalyptus trees will need to be cut for the same.
Same as Alternative 1
14. Concerned Forest Department for necessary approval
Ambala Forest Division, Ambala Range. Same as Alternative 1
15. Type of Common Flora & Fauna Common flora- Mango, Neem, Eucalyptus, Keekar, Local Shrubs and various agricultural crops like Wheat, Paddy and Fodder crops. Common fauna- monkey, domestic animals like dogs, buffalo, cow, goats, common rodents, common reptiles, etc Common avifauna- Birds like Eagle, sparrow, crow, Pigeons, Common ducks, Common geese etc
Same as Alternative 1
16. Endangered Species, if any Nil Nil
17. Historical/ Cultural monuments Nil Nil
18. Details of Tribal area if any Nil Nil
The existing condition of the project site along the proposed Transmission Line is shown by photographs in Annexure II. The Transmission Line is also
marked on the Topographical Sheet, which is given in Annexure III.
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 31
5.1.6 Sub-Project 6 - LILO of 132 KV Isherwal- Jui S/C Line at 132 KV S/Stn Kairu (Bhiwani)
The Transmission Line is proposed with LILO of 132 KV Isherwal- Jui S/C Line at 132 KV S/Stn Kairu (Bhiwani) ACSR (Painther). The total length of the
Transmission Line as per the contract is 5 km, where as the actual length as per walkover survey is 4.2 km. Following are the existing features along the
proposed transmission line:
Table 5.6: Assessment of Alternatives for Sub project 6
Sl. No.
Parameters Features along Alternative 1 (finalized alternative)
Features along Alternative 2 (Straight Line)
Comparative Statement in favour of chosen alternative - 1
1. Required ROW for Transmission Line
27 Same as Alternative 1 Alternative 1 was chosen as against Alternative 2 because of the following reason- Alternative 1 excludes Forest land where as Alternate 2 will pass through Forest area (dense Kikar Plantation)
Alternate 2 will require Forest Clearance as it will pass through Forest land and tree cutting will also be involved. Alternate 1 has been chosen as it will avoid Forest land.
2. Name of the nearest Villages along the Transmission Line
Kairu, Indiwali Same as Alternative 1
3. Terrain
Plain Same as Alternative 1
4. Existing Landuse
Agricultural and Barren land Agricultural, Barren and Forest land
5. Type of existing vegetation
Mustard, Grains, Wheat Same as Alternative 1
6. NH Crossing / Nearby
Nil Nil
7. Metal Road Crossing / PWD Road Crossing
Nil Nil
8. Railway Crossing
Nil Nil
9. Nearby River or Surface water/ Canal Crossing
Khariabas minor canal crossing near Kairu
Same as Alternative 1
10. Crossing of Transmission Line
1 power line crossing near Kairu Same as Alternative 1
11. No. of Affected person
Nil Nil
12. Tree/ Crop and its extent of damage
Very few Kikar trees Dense Kikar plantation
13. Forest involvement Nil (Refer Appendix 2) Dense Kikar plantation coming under forest area
14. Concerned Forest Department for necessary approval
District Forest Office, Bhiwani Same as Alternative 1
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 32
Sl. No.
Parameters Features along Alternative 1 (finalized alternative)
Features along Alternative 2 (Straight Line)
Comparative Statement in favour of chosen alternative - 1
15. Type of Common Flora & Fauna Common flora- Kikar, Ber, Dogar, Chokra, Local Shrubs, etc. Common fauna- monkey, domestic animals like dogs, buffalo, cow, goats, common rodents, common reptiles, etc Common avifauna- Birds like Eagle, sparrow, crow, Pigeons, Common ducks, Common geese etc
Same as Alternative 1
16. Endangered Species, if any Nil Nil
17. Historical/ Cultural monuments Nil Nil
18. Details of Tribal area if any Nil Nil
The existing condition of the project site along the proposed Transmission Line is shown by photographs in Annexure II. The Transmission Line is also
marked on the Topographical Sheet, which is given in Annexure III.
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 33
5.1.7 Sub-Project 7 - 132 kV S/C line on D/C tower with 0.4 sq. inch ACSR (Zebra) from 220 KV Dhanonda to proposed 132 KV sub
station Nangal Mohanpur (Mohindergarh)
The Transmission Line is proposed with 132 kV S/C line on D/C tower with 0.4 sq. inch ACSR (Zebra) from 220 KV Dhanonda to proposed 132 KV sub
station Nangal Mohanpur (Mohindergarh). The total length of the Transmission Line as per the contract is 10 km, where as the actual length as per
walkover survey is 11.26 km. Following are the existing features along the various alternatives studied for the proposed transmission line:
Table 5.7: Assessment of Alternatives for Sub Project 7
Sl. No.
Parameters Features along Alternative 1- (Straight line)
Features along Alternative 2 (finalized alternative)
Comparative Statement in favour of chosen Alternative - 2
1. Required ROW for Transmission Line
27m 27m Alternative 2 was chosen as
against Alternative 1 because of the following reasons- a) Alternative 1 is not technically possible as it would be a constraint for four proposed 400kV Lines and two proposed 220kV lines from proposed 220kV Dhanauda Substation. On the other hand, Alternative 2 crosses only one 132kv line which is technically viable with gantry on its crossing, hence justified. b) Alternative 1 crosses residential structures/ habitations of village Dhanauda. On the other hand, Alternative 2 avoids all kinds of structures and habitations and passes through agricultural field only; hence justified.
2. Name of the nearest Villages along the Transmission Line
Dhanauda, Nangal Dhanauda, Dhanuda bas, Mohammadpur / Mohanpur, Nangal
3. Terrain
Plain Plain
4. Existing Landuse
Mainly Agricultural Land Mainly Agricultural Land
5. Type of existing vegetation Existing agricultural land is used for the
cultivation of Wheat, Mustard in one season and Maize, Oat in the next season
Existing agricultural land is used for the cultivation of Wheat, Mustard in one season and Maize, Oat in the next season
6. NH Crossing / Nearby
Nil Nil
7. Metal Road Crossing / PWD Road Crossing
2 PWD roads, 5 rural roads / cart tracks 2 PWD roads, 5 rural roads / cart tracks
8. Railway Crossing
1 near Gudha Khemla 1 near Gudha Khemla
9. Nearby River or Surface water/ Canal Crossing
Mahendragarh Canal, Bawna Distributary and Nangal distributary
Mahendragarh Canal, Bawna Distributary and Nangal distributary
10. Crossing of Transmission Line
One 132kV Mahendragarh-Kanina Line, Four proposed 400kV Lines and two proposed 220kV lines from proposed 220kV Dhanauda Substation
One 132kV Mahendragarh-Kanina Line
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 34
Sl. No.
Parameters Features along Alternative 1- (Straight line)
Features along Alternative 2 (finalized alternative)
Comparative Statement in favour of chosen Alternative - 2
11. No. of Affected person Described in RRAP Report. Described in RRAP Report.
12. Tree/ Crop and its extent of damage
Standing seasonal crops shall be damaged only during construction
Standing seasonal crops shall be damaged only during construction
13. Forest involvement Nil Nil
14. Concerned Forest Department for necessary approval
DFO, Mahendragarh District, Haryana DFO, Mahendragarh District, Haryana
15. Type of Common Flora & Fauna
Common flora- Kikar, Neem, Safeda,
Pipal, etc
Common fauna- monkey, domestic
animals like dogs, buffalo, cow, goats,
common rodents, common reptiles, etc
Common avifauna- Birds like Eagle, sparrow, crow, Pigeons, Common ducks, Common geese, White Breasted Kingfisher
Common flora- Kikar, Neem, Safeda,
Pipal, etc
Common fauna- monkey, domestic
animals like dogs, buffalo, cow,
goats, common rodents, common
reptiles, etc
Common avifauna- Birds like Eagle, sparrow, crow, Pigeons, Common ducks, Common geese, White Breasted Kingfisher
16. Endangered Species, if any Nil Nil
17. Historical/ Cultural monuments Nil Nil
18. Details of Tribal area if any Nil Nil
The existing condition of the project site along the proposed Transmission Line is shown by photographs in Annexure II. The Transmission Line is also
marked on the Topographical Sheet, which is given in Annexure III.
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 35
5.1.8 Sub-Project 8 - 132 kV S/C line on D/C tower with 0.4 sq. inch ACSR (Zebra) from 220 KV Dhanonda to proposed 132 KV sub
station Pali (Gurgaon)- 10 km (Package G6)
The Transmission Line is proposed with 132 kV S/C line on D/C tower with 0.4 sq. inch ACSR (Zebra) from 220 KV Dhanonda to proposed 132 KV sub
station Pali (Gurgaon). The total length of the Transmission Line as per the contract is 10 km, where as the actual length as per walkover survey is
13.515 km. Following are the existing features along the proposed transmission line:
Table 5.8: Assessment of Alternatives for Sub Project 8
Sl. No.
Parameters Features along Alternative 1(straight line)
Features along Alternative 2 (finalized alternative)
Comparative Statement in favour of Chosen Alternative - 2
1. Required ROW for Transmission Line
52 m 52 m Alternative 2 was chosen as against Alternative 1 because of the following reasons- Alternative 1 crosses residential structures/ habitations of villages Aghiyan, On the other hand, Alternative 2 avoids all kinds of structures and habitations and passes through agricultural field only; hence justified.
2. Name of the nearest Villages along the Transmission Line
Lawan, Agihan, Pali, Dhanaunda Lawan, Aghiyan, Dhanaunda
3. Terrain
Plain Plain
4. Existing Landuse
Mainly Agricultural Land Mainly Agricultural Land
5. Type of existing vegetation
Existing agricultural land is used for the cultivation of Wheat, Mustard, etc.
Existing agricultural land is used for the cultivation of Wheat, Mustard, etc.
6. NH Crossing / Nearby
Nil Nil
7. Metal Road Crossing / PWD Road Crossing
3 PWD roads 4 PWD roads
8. Railway Crossing
Nil Nil
9. Nearby River or Surface water/ Canal Crossing
Bawana Distributary and Lawan Distributary
Bawana Distributary and Lawan Distributary
10. Crossing of Transmission Line
Nil Nil
11. No. of Affected person
Described in RRAP Report. Described in RRAP Report.
12. Tree/ Crop and its extent of damage
Standing seasonal crops shall be damaged only during construction
Standing seasonal crops shall be damaged only during construction
13. Forest involvement Nil Nil
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 36
Sl. No.
Parameters Features along Alternative 1(straight line)
Features along Alternative 2 (finalized alternative)
Comparative Statement in favour of Chosen Alternative - 2
14. Concerned Forest Department for necessary approval
District Forest Office, Mahendragarh district, Haryana
District Forest Office, Mahendragarh district, Haryana
15. Type of Common Flora & Fauna Common flora- Kikar, Neem,
Safeda, Pipal, etc
Common fauna- monkey, domestic
animals like dogs, buffalo, cow,
goats, common rodents, common
reptiles, etc
Common avifauna- Birds like Eagle, sparrow, crow, Pigeons, Common ducks, Common geese, White Breasted Kingfisher
Common flora- Kikar, Neem, Safeda,
Pipal, etc
Common fauna- monkey, domestic
animals like dogs, buffalo, cow, goats,
common rodents, common reptiles, etc
Common avifauna- Birds like Eagle, sparrow, crow, Pigeons, Common ducks, Common geese, White Breasted Kingfisher
16. Endangered Species, if any Nil Nil
17. Historical/ Cultural monuments Nil Nil
18. Details of Tribal area if any Nil Nil
The existing condition of the project site along the proposed Transmission Line is shown by photographs in Annexure II. The Transmission Line is also
marked on the Topographical Sheet, which is given in Annexure III.
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 37
5.1.9 Sub-Project 9 - LILO of 132 KV S/C Hansi- Namaud line at Masudpur (Hansi)
The Transmission Line is proposed with LILO of 132 KV S/C Hansi- Namaud line at Masudpur (Hansi) with 0.2 sq. inch ACSR (Painther). The total length
of the Transmission Line as per the contract is 15 km, where as the actual length as per walkover survey is 13.620 km. Following are the existing
features along the proposed transmission line:
Table 5.9: Assessment of Alternatives for Sub Project 9
Sl. No.
Parameters Features along Alternative 1(Finalised Alternative)
Remarks
1. Required ROW for Transmission Line 27 m No Alternatives were assessed since the chosen alignment was the shortest possible rote and was also found suitable from technical, environmental and social perspectives.
2. Name of the nearest Villages along the Transmission Line
Masud, Maihaud, Dhani Pale, Shaikhpura
3. Terrain Plain
4. Existing Landuse Mainly Agricultural land
5. Type of existing vegetation Agricultural land
6. NH Crossing / Nearby Nil
7. Metal Road Crossing / PWD Road Crossing
2 crossings near village Maihaud 1 crossing near Chanaut minor 2 crossings near village Dhani Pale 1 crossing near village Shaikhpura
8. Railway Crossing Nil
9. Nearby River or Surface water/ Canal Crossing
Crossing Chanaut minor in between Maihaud and Dhani Pale Crossing of Bir Hansi minor near DhaniPale
10. Crossing of Transmission Line 1 power line crossing near village Maihaud
11. No. of Affected person Described in RRAP Report
12. Tree/ Crop and its extent of damage Few numbers of trees has been observed along the road where the proposed Transmission Line is crossing. The exact number of trees will be counted at the time of detailed survey. The permission for cutting / lopping of trees will be taken from State Forest Department before construction stage.
13. Forest involvement Nil
14. Concerned Forest Department for necessary approval
District Forest Office, Hisar District
15. Type of Common Flora & Fauna Common flora- Kikar, Babul, Neem, Pipal, Sisam, Safeda, Eucalyptus etc Common fauna- monkey, domestic animals like dogs, buffalo, cow, goats, common rodents, common reptiles, etc
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 38
Sl. No.
Parameters Features along Alternative 1(Finalised Alternative)
Remarks
Common avifauna- Birds like Eagle, sparrow, crow, Pigeons, Common ducks, Common geese etc
16. Endangered Species, if any Nil
17. Historical/ Cultural monuments Nil
18. Details of Tribal area if any Nil
The existing condition of the project site along the proposed Transmission Line is shown by photographs in Annexure II. The Transmission Line is also
marked on the Topographical Sheet, which is given in Annexure III.
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 39
5.1.10 Sub-Project 10 - LILO of one circuit of 132 KV D/C PTPS- Chandauli line at 132 KV S/Stn Kabri (Panipat)
The Transmission Line is proposed with LILO of one circuit of 132 KV D/C PTPS- Chandauli line at 132 KV S/Stn Kabri (Panipat) with 0.2 sq. inch ACSR
(Painther). The total length of the Transmission Line as per the contract is 3 km, where as the actual length as per walkover survey is 2.3 km. Following
are the existing features along the proposed transmission line:
Table 5.10: Assessment of Alternatives for Sub Project 10
Sl. No.
Parameters Features along Alternative 1 (Finalised alternative)
Features along Alternative 2 (Straight line)
Comparative Statement in favour of chosen alternative-1
1. Required ROW for Transmission Line
27 m 27 m Alternative 1 was chosen as against Alternative 2 because of the following reasons- a) Alternative 1 passes
through less habitated areas as compared to Alternative 2 which passes through an industrial patch.
b) It is estimated that Alternative 1 will tentatively have less number of affected persons since it does not pass through any habitated/ commercial areas and the alignment avoids all existing structures/ habitation of any kind.
2. Name of the nearest Villages along the Transmission Line
Kabri, Faridpur, Nuboli, Singhpura, Gadi Sikandpur
Kabri, Faridpur, Nuboli, Singhpura, Gadi Sikandpur
3. Terrain
Plain Plain
4. Existing Landuse
Agricultural Land partly under agriculture and partly under industrial belt.
5. Type of existing vegetation
Agricultural crops like Wheat, Paddy and Fodder crops.
Agricultural crops like Wheat, Paddy and Fodder crops.
6. NH Crossing / Nearby
Nil Nil
7. Metal Road Crossing / PWD Road Crossing
Nil Nil
8. Railway Crossing
Nil Nil
9. Nearby River or Surface water/ Canal Crossing
Waste water nallah/pond in a natural depression near the fields
Waste water nallah/pond in a natural depression near the fields
10. Crossing of Transmission Line
Nil Nil
11. No. of Affected person
Described in RRAP Report. More than Alternative 1 since many industries in the belt
12. Tree/ Crop and its extent of damage
The transmission line passes mainly through agricultural patch. No trees exist in route of the transmission line. However, agricultural crop will be lost since a total of 10 towers are proposed to be constructed.
Loss of some crops since some of the towers will come on agricultural fields.
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 40
Sl. No.
Parameters Features along Alternative 1 (Finalised alternative)
Features along Alternative 2 (Straight line)
Comparative Statement in favour of chosen alternative-1
13. Forest involvement Nil Nil
14. Concerned Forest Department for necessary approval
Nil Nil
15. Type of Common Flora & Fauna Common flora- Neem, Eucalyptus, Keekar, Local Shrubs and various agricultural crops like Wheat, Paddy and Fodder crops. Common fauna- monkey, domestic animals like dogs, buffalo, cow, goats, common rodents, common reptiles, etc
Common avifauna- Birds like Eagle, sparrow, crow, Pigeons, Common ducks, Common geese etc
Common flora- Neem, Eucalyptus, Keekar, Local Shrubs and various agricultural crops like Wheat, Paddy and Fodder crops. Common fauna- monkey, domestic animals like dogs, buffalo, cow, goats, common rodents, common reptiles, etc Common avifauna- Birds like Eagle, sparrow, crow, Pigeons, Common ducks, Common geese etc
16. Endangered Species, if any Nil Nil
17. Historical/ Cultural monuments Nil Nil
18. Details of Tribal area if any Nil Nil
The existing condition of the project site along the proposed Transmission Line is shown by photographs in Annexure II. The Transmission Line is also
marked on the Topographical Sheet, which is given in Annexure III.
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 41
6.0 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
6.1 During Construction Activities
6.1.1 Land Use
Minor change in land use pattern is envisaged during the construction phase. At present most of the land is
agricultural land. Due to construction of towers, crop production in the area occupied by the tower will be
stopped.
6.1.2 Ambient Air Quality
Construction activities will involve excavation for erection of tower and movement of vehicles carrying the
construction material, etc. This will result in the emission of dust particles thereby affecting ambient air quality
marginally at the site; this will be transitory. Spraying of water during excavation will reduce the dust emission to
a great extent.
6.1.3 Ambient Noise Level
During construction phase, the sources of noise pollution will primarily be movement of vehicles transporting
construction material and equipment to the site. Since, the project site is away from habitation, the villagers will
not be affected due to increased noise level. Major construction work is expected to be carried out during the
day time. Noise produced will not have a significant impact on existing ambient noise levels. Use of low-noise-
generating equipment and restriction of construction activity for limited periods will minimize disturbance from
noise pollution.
6.1.4 Water Quality
Erection of towers for transmission line will not have
any significant impact on surface and groundwater
quality along the line.
6.1.5 Soil
Some loss of top soil is envisaged during various
constructional activities due to excavation of earth,
land leveling etc. at the places where the towers will
be erected for transmission line. However, the
same can be easily mitigated by storing the top soil
and spreading it over other areas of the agricultural
fields.
6.1.6 Flora
The initial construction work along the alignment
involves land clearance, cutting, filling, and leveling;
and may cause loss of vegetation. In various cases
(as described in Tables 2.1 to 2.10 for all
Figure 6.0: Excavation for tower erection for 400kv
transmission line at 400kV substation,
Sector 72, Gurgaon from where 220kv
line is proposed to Firozpur Zirka
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 42
subprojects respectively under Package G-6), trees might need to be cut/ trimmed for laying of transmission
lines causing a loss of flora. Further loss to flora would be due to loss of crops in the area occupied by the
tower base.
Care should be taken to avoid thick vegetation; towers should be located where the vegetation is thin. This will
greatly minimize tree loss and compensation to be paid to tree owners. The project involves cutting of trees for
selected location along the proposed transmission line. Hence, clearance for trees to be cut will be required
from Forest Department and Compensatory Afforestation has to be done in association with the state
Department of Forests. Trimming of trees should be done in consultation with the Department of Forests.
6.1.7 Fauna
The existing land use for the transmission line is not used for grazing by domestic animals like cow, buffalo,
goats etc; hence minimal disturbance to local animals is anticipated during construction.
6.1.8 Health and Safety
There have been some concerns about the possibility of an increased risk of cancers from exposure to
electromagnetic radiations from overhead transmission lines. Further, Constructional workers might be injured
or meet accidents during constructional activities. Injuries, bruises, transmissible diseases, etc are expected to
be observed due to unhygienic condition or without any protective measures. Therefore, Personal Protective
Equipments (PPEs) like safety gloves, helmet, and noise protection will be provided during construction work.
Necessary training regarding safety aspects to the personnel working at site and line inspectors will be
provided.
Although the transmission lines will be out of reach of people, Local villagers shall be informed about the safety
plan, necessary Do’s and Don’ts and necessary precautionary measures. The Contractor shall follow the
National Electrical Code Handbook, 2008 for safety measures during construction phase of transmission line.
An extract from safety code consisting of Dos & Don’ts for workers on substation & transmission line
equipments are given in Annexure- VIII of ESPP.
6.1.9 Socio-economic Conditions
Socio-economic impacts during constructional phase due to erection of transmission lines will be minorly
negative due to loss of agricultural land on which towers will be erected. However, as per the provisions of
ESPP, the landowners will be provided a compensation for crop loss during the construction phase.
6.1.10 Resettlement
There is no issue related to resettlement and rehabilitation as it has been avoided during the walkover survey.
The rehabilitation & resettlement action plans (RRAP) Report (RRAP - Package G6) can be referred for further
details.
6.1.11 Cultural Sites
No archaeological, historical, or culturally important sites are located near the proposed Transmission Line.
During construction phase, if any cultural property is found, the work will be stopped immediately and the
Contractor will immediately intimate to HVPNL about availability of cultural property. HVPNL will intimate to
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 43
Department of Archeology & Museums, Haryana and approval will be taken to erect the tower for transmission
line.
6.2 During Operation Activities
6.2.1 Land Use
Minor change in land use pattern is envisaged during the operation phase. At present the portion of land where
towers will be erected is mainly agricultural land. During operation phase, the same land can again be utilized
for agriculture purpose. Therefore the impact on land use is very less, though permanent in nature.
6.2.2 Air Quality
No impact on ambient air quality level is anticipated during the operational stage due to erection of transmission
lines.
6.2.3 Noise
No change in ambient noise level is anticipated during the operational stage due to erection of transmission
lines.
6.2.4 Water Quality
No impacts on ground water or surface water quality are anticipated during the operational stage due to
erection of transmission lines.
6.2.5 Soil
Negligible impact on soil is expected during the operational phase.
6.2.6 Flora
Since the trees near the transmission lines may increase the chances of fires due to electric sparks, therefore
trimming of trees throughout the transmission line at regular interval is suggested to minimize the risk of
accidents and proper maintenance. This will require regulatory approval from Forest Department. Hence a
minor/negligible impact on flora is predicted during operational phases.
6.2.7 Fauna
Since Avial Fauna might be at small risk by hitting the transmission lines, hence a minor impact is predicted
during operational phases. Addition of deflectors is proposed to minimize this risk.
6.2.8 Health and Safety
Engineers/ Linemen might be injured or meet accidents during maintenance activities. Injuries, bruises,
transmissible diseases, etc are expected to be observed due to unhygienic condition or with out any protective
measures. There have been some concerns about the possibility of an increased risk of cancers from exposure
to electromagnetic radiations from overhead transmission lines.
An extract from safety code consisting of Do’s & Don’ts for workers on substations & transmission line
equipments are provided in Annexure- VIII of ESPP.
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 44
The EMP hence defines the necessary precautions required to be considered during design of towers wherever
there are crossings such as metal road, NH, river/ canal and railway lines, as well as informing the villagers
about safety plans and necessary precautions for maintenance workers.
6.2.9 Socio-Economic Conditions
Socio economic conditions of the project villages around the proposed substations are predicted to improve due
to an overall increased power supply in the grid and hence an increased power supply in the villages as well.
Increase in power supply to these rural areas will beneficially impact the socio economic conditions thereby
directly/ indirectly triggering the growth of cottage industries, dairy industries, agricultural upgradation, health
and education facilities, infrastructural development etc. Therefore, the overall impact on socio-economic
condition will be positive for this project.
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 45
7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
7.1 Components of EMP
The EMP consists of a set of mitigation, monitoring and institutional measures to be taken for the project to
avoid, minimize and mitigate adverse environmental impacts and enhance positive impacts. The plan also
includes the action needed for implementation of these measures.
The major components of the Environmental Management Plan are:
Mitigation of potentially adverse impacts;
Monitoring during project implementation and operation; and
Institutional arrangements.
7.2 Impacts, Mitigation and Institutional Responsibilities
The identified environmental issues and suggested mitigation measures with institutional arrangements for
implementation, supervision and monitoring have been provided in matrix format (Environmental
Management Plan) in Annexure IV. These mitigation measures will be implemented as applicable for this
subproject.
7.3 Institutional Framework
HVPNL will have three tier Institutional Bodies to oversee and implement ESPP. The bodies are constituted at
Head Quarter level, Zonal level and Divisional level. Three levels Institutional body is given in Figure 7.0. The
EMP implementation may be done by HVPNL or an independent agency deployed by HVPNL.
7.3.1 EMP Implementation by HVPNL
The EMP implementation may be done through Divisional level. The role and responsibilities are defined in
following section for Head Quarter level, Zonal level and Divisional level at HVPNL.
At Head Quarter Level
Environment, Resettlement and Rehabilitation Committee (ER&R) has been constituted under the
chairmanship of Director Technical. The other members of the committee include the concerned Chief
Engineer/TS and CE/P&D HVPN, Panchkula and Deputy Secretary/Projects. Deputy Secretary/Projects will be
the Member Secretary of the R&R Committee.
At Zonal Level
The Environment & Social Monitoring Committee (ESMC) constitute of concerned Chief Engineer/TS,
concerned Superintendent Engineer/TS, concerned Executive Engineer/TS, Land Acquisition Officer and two
representatives of AFs and ESMC would report to Director Technical, HVPNL, Panchkula.
At Divisional Level
In addition to above, Environment & Social Implementation Unit (ESIU) has also been constituted consisting of
Executive Engineer/TS and SSE/SDO/ Construction of concerned place.
The role and functions of the ER&R, ESMC & ESIU include but are not limited to:
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 46
Co-ordinate among various agencies involved in implementation of the ESPP programs;
Monitor and review implementation of the ESPP Plans;
Function as a grievance redressal body; and
Provide overall guidance and leadership for smooth implementation of resettlement and rehabilitation
plans.
To review the ESPP Policy after every two years.
Figure 7.0: Three tier Institutional body at HVPNL
Major Responsibility of Environment & Social Implementation Unit (ESIU) at Divisional Level:
Advise HVPNL on preparing reports to World Bank and other statutory bodies;
Preparing procedures for implementing EMP;
Review Contractor’s EMP, traffic management plan and safety plan and recommend for its approval ;
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 47
Provide training to HVPNL and Contractors’ staff on implementing environmental safeguard measures;
Advise on obtaining various statutory environmental clearances on time;
Conduct periodic field visits to examine environmental compliances and suggest corrective actions; and
Any other issues as will be required to ensure environmental compliance.
7.3.2 EMP Implementation by Independent Agency
HVPNL may engage Independent Agencies/ Engineer for carrying out pollution monitoring activities. The
Independent Agencies/ Engineer will liaise with HVPNL environment unit to ensure that Contractor complies
with the requirements of various environmental safeguard measures through supervision, monitoring and
reporting on the same. Efforts must be made by Independent Agencies/ Engineer to ensure that environmental
mitigation and good-construction-practices are not only considered but actually implemented as integral
component of each civil activity. It should be considered as day-to-day activity. The project may have a
provision of part time input of Environmental Specialist within Independent Agencies/ Engineer to
supervise implementation of safeguard measures. His role would be more on advisory.
Advise HVPNL on preparing reports to World Bank and other statutory bodies;
Preparing procedures for implementing EMP;
review Contractor’s EMP, traffic management plan and safety plan and recommend for its approval ;
provide training to HVPNL and Contractors’ staff on implementing environmental safeguard measures;
advise on obtaining various statutory environmental clearances on time;
conduct periodic field visits to examine environmental compliances and suggest corrective actions ; and
any other issues as will be required to ensure environmental compliance.
For ensuring that EMP is properly implemented, contract shall appoint a full time qualified and
experienced Environmental and Safety Officer (ESO) from the commencement to completion of the
project. The qualification and responsibilities of ESO as stipulated below should be considered.
The qualification of ESO will be as given below:
Diploma or Graduate in Civil Engineering with post graduate specialization in Environmental Engineering or Environmental Science or equivalent;
5 to 10 years of total professional experience; and
About 3 to 5 years of experience in similar projects i.e. management of environmental issues in design and construction of Sub-station / Transmission line.
The responsibilities of ESO of Contractor will include the following:
Directly reporting to the Project Manager of the Contractor;
Discussing various environmental issues and environmental mitigation, enhancement and monitoring actions with all concerned directly or indirectly;
Prepare Contractor’s EMP and safety plan as part of their Work Program;
Ensure contractor’s compliance with the EMP stipulations and conditions of statutory bodies;
Conducting periodic environmental and safety training for contractor’s engineers, supervisors and workers;
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 48
Preparing a registers for material sources, labour, pollution monitoring results, public complaint and as may be directed by the Engineer/ Independent Agencies;
Assisting the HVPNL on various environmental monitoring and control activities including pollution monitoring; and
Preparing and submitting monthly reports to Independent Agencies/ Engineer on status of implementation safeguard measures.
7.4 Capacity Building
Training and development of employees are integral part for implementation of ESPP. Training will be imparted
to the Superintending Engineer, Executive/ Non Executive, so as to enable them to understand the ESPP
document and, to take necessary steps in right time of EMP implement. The training will be imparted at the
HVPNL training institutes.
7.5 Environmental Monitoring
For Transmission Line, monitoring of environmental parameters is not necessary, since it does not have any
impact on the air, water and noise quality.
7.6 Environmental Budget
The tentative environmental budget for Transmission Lines in package G6 during construction phase has been
calculated on lump sum basis. Assumptions have been made for number of tree to be planted (depending on
length of the Transmission line) as a compensatory tree plantation due to tower erection and transmission lines.
Exact budget shall be finalized after detailed survey.
Table 7.0 Environmental Budget for Package G6
Sl.
No. Item Description Quantity
Rate / Unit
(Rs)
Amount (Rs.)
for Total 184 Km (total
observed length of all
transmission lines under
the package)
A
Compensatory tree plantation (Considered for
approximately 4700 number of tree)- for 184 km (total
observed length of all transmission lines under the
package), i.e. total trees to be planted under
compensatory plantation (considering 1:10 ratio7)= 4700 X
10= 47000
300 141,00,000
B EMP Training at site Lump sum/site 7,00,000
Total Environmental Cost (A+B) 148,00,000
Contingency charges @ 6% on total 8,88,000
Total Environmental Budget for package G-6 156,88,000
7 As per Clause 5 of Attachment A of Annexure VII of the ESPP, The Forest Department shall plant dwarf trees up to ten times the number of trees removed from the right of way. For the purpose of this report, the maximum number i.e. ten trees to be planted for every tree being cut has been considered.
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 49
8.0 STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTATION AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE
8.1 Institutional Stakeholders’ Consultation
Stakeholders’ consultation has been done to collect the following specific information.
Site visit done for sub-station;
Any ecological sensitive area passing through / close to sub-station;
Project features related with environmental and social issues;
Land acquisition process for sub-station; and
Topographical Sheet for sub-station.
List of key stakeholders consulted for the project at institutional level is given in Table 8.0.
Table 8.0: List of stakeholders during Institutional Consultation
Sl No. Name of the Officials Designation TS Circle / Division
1. Mr. Jai Bhagwan Sub-station officer Barwala S/Stn
2. Mr. C. R. Soran S. D. O. Civil Bhiwani
3. Mr. Khurana S.D.O. Civil Bhiwani
4. Mr. Kuldip J. E Bhiwani
5. Mr. Narinder Sharma XEN, T/S Division Bhiwani
6. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj AEE Faridabad
7. Mr. T. R. Nanda SE T/S Circle Faridabad
8. Mr. Raghubir Saran SE T/S Circle Gurgaon
9. Bheera Singh J.E., HVPNL Hisar
10. Kulbir Singh XEN, HVPNL Hisar
11. Mr. P. K. Paliwal SE, HVPNL Hisar
12. V. K. Choudhary A.E.E & SDO Const. S/D- II Hisar
13. V. K. Pravakar XEN/ Civil, HVPNL Hisar
14. Er. D. K. Kalra XEN, Civil Karnal
15. Er. Rajesh SDO, Construction Karnal
16. Er. Y. P. Niranjan XEN, HVPNL Karnal
17. Mr R.N. Misha SSE, substation Mahendragarh
18. Mr. Tarachand EE, Civil Mahendragarh
19. Mr. Deepak Garg AEE Palwal
20. Mr. Nandalal JE Palwal
21. Mr. G. D. Manocha A.A.E, Madanpur Panchkula
22. Mr. Rakesh Jolly XEN T/S Division Panchkula
23. Mr. Yogesh Gupta Assistant Executive Engineer Panchkula
24. Mr. A. K. Singhla XEN T/S Division Panipat
25. Mr. R.P. Bhatia Xen, T/S Division Rewari
8.2 Public Consultation
Power Transmission projects do not create much environmental and social impact which may result in
resistance from public. In spite of this, HVPNL has a firm commitment towards public awareness of possible
social & environmental impacts, however minor these may be. As a first step, as per Section 29 of Electricity
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 50
(Supply) Act-1948, public notification of the projects is published in local newspaper to invite objections from
Public within two months.
Before finalization of ESPP document, due consultation with public at large was done by issuance of the notice
in the newspaper by making available the draft ESPP at circle headquarters and website of the corporation.
The comments / suggestion offered by the public were given due weightage and incorporated in the ESPP.
8.3 Purpose
The purpose of the public consultation includes the following:
To ascertain the public views on various environmental issues related to sub-station;
To encourage and provide for people’s participation in project implementation; and
To obtain new insight and site specific information, and to appropriating possible mitigation measures
based on local knowledge of the communities
8.4 Process Adopted
Public consultation is an integral part of EMP report. Community consultations covering Environmental and
Social aspects have been done at proposed sub-stations with Panchayat members and local villagers including
women group. Local communities, who are primary stakeholders, have been chosen for consultation. Focused
group discussion with the local community is adopted as a tool for the consultation at Sub-stations. The local
communities have been informed in advance about the date, venue, and purposes of the public consultation
with briefing on project interventions including its benefits and disadvantages. The environmental concerns and
suggestions made by the participants has been listed out, discussed and dissolved.
8.5 Outcome of Public Consultation
Local communities are aware of the proposed transmission line. Most of the participants welcomed the project
and requested for early completion with an expectation that they will get more power supply as a benefit out of
the project. Specific environmental concerns and suggestions emerged from the local community consultation
are summarised as follows:
Farmers of a village pointed out that, post harvest, they carry their crops over the tractor and for security
purpose a farmer sits over the trimmed crops. This causes him to reduce minimum ground clearance
required from the transmission line while commuting below the high voltage transmission line. They
witness electric shocks especially during rainy season when as they come close in contact with the
transmission line.
Majority of the villages receive only 5-6 hrs of electricity supply per day, leading to inconsistent and
inadequate water supply and hampering the agricultural productivity of the region
The intermittent electric supply has led to installation of diesel generator sets at major places, this is not
only having a negative impact of the environment but is also hampering the economics of the region as
the cost of power from these diesel generator sets is much higher than the normal electric supply
Small scale and household industries can be developed if they get adequate electric supply
The consistent supply of electricity would have a positive impact on the education of children which is
deprived off in the present situation
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 51
Household works like ironing, refrigeration etc would also get a positive impact due the project
The documents on public consultation such as attendance sheet and photographs of the participants are
provided in Annexure V and Annexure VI respectively.
Faridabad Circle
Community consultations were carried out in 14 villages with the respective Panchayat, village community and
women groups. These consultations brought forth the necessity of project intervention of this kind. Two distinct
and contradictory perceptions emerged from these discussions. While in Mewat district, the paucity of power
and demand for more power to meet the domestic and agricultural needs was the overpowering message, in
Gurgaon district satisfaction with the current power supply and the need to preserve land so that its utility
whether it be for agriculture or its value for commercial purposes is not diminished by installation of towers for
power transmission provided contrasting perceptions that were indicative of more of the socio-economic reality
than the changed land use. Depreciation in value of land and potential loss of land due to other proposed
infrastructural interventions such as gas, water and sewer pipelines, railway lines, emerged as their main
concerns and therefore requested re-routing of the lines to save their lands. Largely, communities were similar
in their expectations of the project. This contrast continues in issues such as compensation for land besides
standing crops with communities in Mewat accepting the tower points on their lands as a requirement while the
urban areas were keener on the compensation for such impacts. Safety emerged as major concern for most
people and in particular for women folks, while they acknowledged the overall benefits that will accrue from
these lines.
Gurgaon Circle
Community consultations were carried out in 11 villages with the respective Panchayat, village community and
women groups. These consultations brought forth the necessity of project intervention of this kind. Two distinct
perceptions emerged from these discussions. At present power supply is inadequate and demand for more
power was unanimous to meet the domestic and agricultural needs of villagers across the districts of Rewari
and Mahendragarh regardless of their socio-economic status. Largely, communities were similar in their
expectations of the project. They expressed concern about the compensation for land besides standing crops.
They appreciated the efforts made by HVPNL in routing these lines. Safety emerged as major concern for most
people and in particular for women folks, while they acknowledged the overall benefits that will accrue from
these lines.
Hisar Circle
Community consultations were carried out in 8 villages with the respective Panchayat, village community and
women groups. These consultations brought forth the necessity of project intervention of this kind. Two distinct
perceptions emerged from these discussions. At present power supply is inadequate and demand for more
power was unanimous to meet the domestic and agricultural needs with villagers across the districts of Hisar
and Bhiwani regardless of their socio-economic status. Largely, communities were similar in their expectations
of the project. They expressed concern about the compensation for land besides standing crops. They
appreciated the efforts made by HVPNL in routing these lines and taking them in to the interiors that shall
ensure that many of the villages at the tail-end, at long last, shall be beneficiaries. Safety emerged as major
concern for most people and in particular for women folks, while they acknowledged the overall benefits that will
accrue from these lines.
Panchkula & Karnal Circle
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 52
Community consultations were carried out in 5 villages with the respective Panchayat, village community and
women groups. These consultations brought forth the necessity of project intervention of this kind. At present,
power supply is inadequate and demand for more power was unanimous to meet the domestic and agricultural
needs with villagers across the districts of Panchkula, Ambala, Panipat regardless of their socio-economic
status. Depreciation in value of land and potential limited access to land emerged as their main concerns and
therefore some of the villagers requested re-routing of the lines to save their land. Largely, communities were
similar in their expectations of the project. They expressed concern about the compensation for land besides
standing crops. They appreciated the efforts made by HVPNL in routing these lines and taking them in to the
interiors that shall ensure that many of the villages at the tail-end, at long last, shall be beneficiaries. Safety
emerged as major concern for most people and in particular for women folks, while they acknowledged the
overall benefits that will accrue from these lines.
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 53
9.0 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
The routes of proposed transmission lines have been selected as best possible option because of the following
reasons:
No Human habitation is affected
Exclude Ecologically sensitive areas
Environmentally important areas (wetlands, forest lands etc) has been avoided
No grazing land in vicinity of the project area
The proposed lines will pass through mainly agricultural land which belongs to nearby villagers. The conclusion
emerged from the consultation with the villagers is that they have no objection in giving their land provided they
are given proper compensation for their land and crop.
Positive impacts of the project observed during public Consultation:
Better electric supply
Employment opportunities
Future developments in other infrastructure like water supply, drainage and sanitation, etc.
Improvement in Education and Health
Growing of small scale household industries
9.1 Specific Findings and Recommendations of each sub project:
In addition to mitigation measures described in EMP Table given in Annexure IV and guidelines provided in ESPP, following are a few specific recommendations for each sub project:
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 54
Sub-Project Name of Circle/
Division
Specific Findings Specific Recommendations
Sub-Project 1:
220 kV D/C Sector 72, Gurgaon to Rangla Rajpur (Firozpur Zirka) line with 0.6 sq. inch ACSR (Moose) via Nun- 80 km
Faridabad/ Palwal
Few standing trees along roads could be cut during construction.
Small ponds / tubewell exist within 150m near villages Malab, Dihana, Ganduri and Ghasera from the chosen alignment.
The proposed alignment shall cross few distributaries, canal, and roads
The proposed alignment shall cross proposed Manesar-Palwal expressway
Sometimes farmers who carry the trimmed crops on the tractor, underneath the high tension line feel electric shocks when there is a significant reduction in the distance between the farmer and the line.
Compensatory plantation shall be done in consultation with the forest department @1:3
Precautionary measures shall be taken during construction activities to avoid contamination of groundwater.
Towers must be erected at significant distance from the both sides of the distributaries/ canal. If technically feasible, the vertical distance between the two towers shall be perpendicular to the distributaries/ canal/ roads to minimize the length of the line crossing the same.
Extended towers must be erected at significant distance from the both sides of the expressway. If technically feasible, the vertical distance between the two towers shall be perpendicular to the road to minimize the length of the line crossing the same.
It is necessary to inform local farmers to stop travelling beneath the high tension lines while sitting over the fresh wet trimmed crops on the tractor. They should be informed about the safety and necessary precautionary measures to avoid health hazard that causes due to reduction in the distance between human and high tension lines.
Sub-Project 2:
220 kV D/C line with 0.5 sq. inch ACSR (Moose) from proposed 400 KV substation Nawada (Faridabad) to 220 KV sub stationA-6 Faridabad - 6 km
Faridabad/ Faridabad
The alignment is proposed along the existing and proposed HUDA Green belt. The proposed HUDA Green belt however, shall run parallel to the proposed road (outer peripheral / ring road) by HUDA which shall pass through agricultural field near village Mujeri. Land for this proposed road and green belt has already been acquired from land owners (villages – Nawada, Chandauli, Mujeri, Sotai and Machgar) by HUDA as per the consultation with the local villagers of Mujeri village.
The proposed alignment shall cross 2 distributaries and Agra canal;
The proposed subproject shall serve urban and industrial power load.
Construction activities for the proposed alignment can only commence post finalization of the green belt by HUDA along the proposed road by HUDA.
Same as above
The project will benefit the whole district and hence recommended.
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 55
Sub-Project Name of Circle/
Division
Specific Findings Specific Recommendations
Sub-Project 3:
LILO of both circuits of existing 220 KV D/C 400 KV Mayar (PGCIL Hisar) S/Stn to Isherwal S/Stn at 220 KV S/Stn Sangwan (Tosham) with 0.4 sq. inch ACSR (Zebra) - 40 km
Hisar/ Bhiwani
The route of the proposed transmission line does not involve any human habitation;
Any monument of cultural or historical importance is not affected by the route of the transmission line;
The proposed route of transmission line does not affect any public utility services such as playgrounds, schools and other establishments;
The line route does not pass through any sanctuaries, National Park, Biosphere reserves or eco-sensitive zones;
The line route does not infringe with area of natural resources;
Few standing trees along roads could be cut during construction; and
Khanak minor canal crossing near Gurkhana Johra, Bhurtana minor canal crossing between Jaran ki Chhan and Alakpura, Baliyali minor crossing near Sagwan
Compensatory plantation shall be done in consultation with the forest department for trees marked to be cut ;
Precautionary measures shall be taken during construction activities to avoid contamination of groundwater;
Maintaining adequate clearance requirements within the right-of-way; i.e., trimming trees prior to conducting other construction activities;
Towers must be erected at significant distance from the both sides of the distributaries/ canal. If technically feasible, the vertical distance between the two towers shall be perpendicular to the distributaries/ canal/ roads to minimize the length of the line crossing the same.
Construction activities shall be undertaken during day time and local communities informed of the construction schedule.
Sub-Project 4:
220 kV D/C line with 400 KV S/Stn PKL to 220 KV S/Stn Raiwall (Panchkula) with 0.5 sq. inch ACSR (Moose) - 15 km
Panchkula/ Panchkula
The proposed line starts from a proposed Substation(under Power Grid) at Naggal Village. The location of the proposed substation to be constructed by Power Grid is being opposed by the villagers. The villagers informed that construction of substation would result in hindering of the flow of wastewater coming from an outlet near the road and would hence result in backflow of the wastewater into Naggal Village. Hence, if considering the same, it is decided to discuss/ alter the proposed Power Grid substation site, the origin point and the alignment of the subject transmission line might be affected.
The line passes mainly through agricultural fields but has some trees coming in route of the line which will need to be either cut or trimmed.
Closer to the end point, it crosses through an area densely populated with trees such as Kikar, Shisham, Safeda, Shahtoot, Mango, Ber and Neem
Dangri River runs parallel to the proposed route. Although the Topographical Sheet
Before starting the work on the transmission line, the HVPNL has to address the issue of the said substation site identified by POWERGRID. The social opposition of this site has spread across the area and the villagers are likely to oppose footing of towers, if the issue of substation site is not resolved.
It is recommended to avoid as much felling of trees as possible while laying of the transmission line.
Compensatory plantation shall be done in consultation with the forest department @1:3
It is necessary to inform local farmers to stop travelling beneath the high tension lines while sitting over the fresh wet trimmed crops on the tractor. They should be informed about the safety and necessary precautionary measures to avoid health hazard that causes
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 56
Sub-Project Name of Circle/
Division
Specific Findings Specific Recommendations
shows the River to be touching the route of the proposed transmission line, however, on ground verification, it was observed that the river has changed its course in past few years and is not at a distance of about 1 km from the proposed route.
The proposed alignment crosses State Highway – 73.
Sometimes farmers who carry the trimmed crops on the tractor, underneath the high tension line feel electric shocks when there is a significant reduction in the distance between the farmer and the line.
due to reduction in the distance between human and high tension lines.
Sub-Project 5:
LILO of one circuit of 220 KV Panchkula- Tapla Line at 220 KV S/Stn Raiwali (Panchkula) with 0.4 sq. inch ACSR (Zebra) - 10 km
Panchkula/ Panchkula
The land use through which the transmission line is proposed is predominantly agricultural.
The proposed route alignment shall result in felling of nearly 500private trees that include fruit bearing trees such as Mango, Shahtoot, etc and mostly used for household consumption.
Sometimes farmers who carry the trimmed crops on the tractor, underneath the high tension line feel electric shocks when there is a significant reduction in the distance between the farmer and the line.
It is recommended to avoid as much felling of trees as possible while laying of the transmission line.
Compensatory plantation shall be done in consultation with the forest department @1:3
It is necessary to inform local farmers to stop travelling beneath the high tension lines while sitting over the fresh wet trimmed crops on the tractor. They should be informed about the safety and necessary precautionary measures to avoid health hazard that causes due to reduction in the distance between human and high tension lines.
Sub-Project 6:
LILO of 132 KV Isherwal- Jui S/C Line at 132 KV S/Stn Kairu (Bhiwani) ACSR (Painther) - 5 km
Hisar/ Bhiwani
The route of the proposed transmission line does not involve any human habitation;
Any monument of cultural or historical importance is not affected by the route of the transmission line;
The proposed route of transmission line does not affect any public utility services such as playgrounds, schools and other establishments;
The line route does not pass through any sanctuaries, National Park, Biosphere reserves or eco-sensitive zones;
The line route does not infringe with area of natural resources;
Few standing trees along roads could be cut during construction; and
Khariabas minor canal crossing near Kairu village
Compensatory plantation shall be done in consultation with the forest department ;
Short-term construction impacts to trees and other mature vegetation would be minimized or avoided by maintaining adequate clearance requirements within the right-of-way; i.e., trimming trees prior to conducting other construction activities
Precautionary measures shall be taken during construction activities to avoid contamination of groundwater; and
Construction activities shall be undertaken during day time and local communities informed of the construction schedule.
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 57
Sub-Project Name of Circle/
Division
Specific Findings Specific Recommendations
Sub-Project 7:
132 kV S/C line on D/C tower with 0.4 sq. inch ACSR (Zebra) from 220 KV Dhanonda to proposed 132 KV sub station Nangal Mohanpur (Mohindergarh) - 10 km
Gurgaon/ Rewari
Few standing trees along roads could be cut during construction.
The proposed alignment shall cross few distributaries, canal, and roads
The proposed alignment shall cross existing railway line
Sometimes farmers who carry the trimmed crops on the tractor, underneath the high tension line feel electric shocks when there is a significant reduction in the distance between the farmer and the line.
Compensatory plantation shall be done in consultation with the forest department @1:3
Towers must be erect at significant distance from the both sides of the distributaries/ canal/road. If technically feasible, the vertical distance between the two towers shall be perpendicular to the distributaries/canal/roads to minimize the length of the line crossing the same.
Extended towers must be erect at significant distance from the both sides of the railway line8. If technically feasible, the vertical distance between the two towers shall be perpendicular to the railway track to minimize the length of the line crossing the same.
It is necessary to inform local farmers to stop travelling beneath the high tension lines while sitting over the fresh wet trimmed crops on the tractor. They should be informed about the safety and necessary precautionary measures to avoid health hazard that causes due to reduction in the distance between human and high tension lines.
Sub-Project 8:
132 kV S/C line on D/C tower with 0.4 sq. inch ACSR (Zebra) from 220 KV Dhanonda to proposed 132 KV sub station Pali (Gurgaon) - 10 km
Gurgaon/ Rewari
Few standing trees along roads could be cut during construction.
The proposed alignment shall cross few distributaries, and roads
Sometimes farmers who carry the trimmed crops on the tractor, underneath the high tension line feel electric shocks when there is a significant reduction in the distance between the farmer and the line.
Same as above
Sub-Project 9:
LILO of 132 KV S/C Hansi- Namaud line at Masudpur (Hansi) with 0.2 sq. inch ACSR (Painther)- 15 km
Hisar/ Hisar The land use through which the proposed transmission line is passing predominantly agricultural
The proposed alignment shall cross few metal road and minor canal
No impacts on habitations
Same as above
8 The distance of the nearest tower from the railway track shall be greater than the height of that tower itself.
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 58
Sub-Project Name of Circle/
Division
Specific Findings Specific Recommendations
Sub-Project 10:
LILO of one circuit of 132 KV D/C PTPS- Chandauli line at 132 KV S/Stn Kabri (Panipat) with 0.2 sq. inch ACSR (Painther) - 3 km
Karnal/ Panipat
The chosen route avoids the industrial area adjacent to the existing sub-station and travel across a small patch of barren land before taking a straight route passing through agricultural patch right till its end point
No impacts on either trees or on habitations.
Same as above
Consultancy Service for the preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank aided project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 59
ANNEXURE I : PROJECT AREA DEMARCATION ON DISTRICT PLANNING MAP
Hisar District
Consultancy Service for the preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank aided project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 60
ANNEXURE I : PROJECT AREA DEMARCATION ON DISTRICT PLANNING MAP
Bhiwani District
Consultancy Service for the preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank aided project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 61
ANNEXURE I : PROJECT AREA DEMARCATION ON DISTRICT PLANNING MAP
Panipat District
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 62
ANNEXURE – II : PHOTOGRAPHS OF PROJECT SITE ALONG THE PROPOSED TRANSMISSION LINE
Sub-Project 1 - 220 kV D/C Sector 72, Gurgaon to Rangla Rajpur (Firozpur Zirka) line
1. Trees that may be cut along Alwar-Sohna-Gurgaon State highway on the route of the proposed line
2. Eucalyptus along PWD road that may be cut or avoided en-route of the proposed line
3. Aravalli hills (approximately 1.5 km away) from the chosen alignment
4. Proposed route of transmission line 5. A distributary en-route of the proposed line 6. A pond approximately 150 m away from the line near village Ghasera
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 63
Sub-Project -2 220 kV D/C line from Nawada (Faridabad) to A-6 Faridabad
1. Agricultural field from which HUDA Green belt is proposed
2. Proposed Site for Nawada Sub station- originating
point of the line
3. A 220 kV line and Ballabhgarh Distributary en-
route of the proposed alignment
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 64
Sub-Project 3 - LILO Mayar (PGCIL Hisar) S/Stn to Isherwal S/Stn at Sangwan (Tosham)
1. Road towards Kirawar village 2. View of Agricultural Land
3. Starting Point (Tower No. 50 of Mayar - Isherwal
Line)
4. Road Crossing
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 65
Sub-Project 4- 220 kV D/C line with 400 KV S/Stn PKL to 220 KV S/Stn Raiwalli (Panchkula)
1. Proposed Site for Naggal Sub station (Under
Power Grid)- originating point of the line
2. Wastewater outlet from villages in agricultural
fields- Naggal
3. Proposed route of the transmission line
through Agricultural fields
4. Proposed route of the transmission line 5. SH-73 Crossing 6. Village road crossing
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 66
Sub-Project 5 - LILO of Panchkula- Tepla Line at Raiwali (Panchkula)
1. Proposed route of the transmission line through
Agricultural fields
2. Solar Panels in Village Nayagaon
3. Village road crossing 4. Agricultural Fields en-route of the proposed
transmission line
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 67
Sub-Project 6 - LILO of 132 KV Isherwal- Jui S/C Line at Kairu (Bhiwani)
1. Village road and agricultural field enroute of
proposed line
2. Starting point of proposed transmission line
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 68
Sub-Project 7 - 0.4 sq. inch ACSR (Zebra) from Dhanonda to Nangal Mohanpur (Mohindergarh)
1. Mahendergarh Canal enroute of proposed transmission line 2. Railway track near GudhaKhemla enroute of proposed transmission line
3. Open scrub near GudhaKhemla enroute of proposed transmission line
4. Nangal Distributary enroute of proposed transmission line
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 69
Sub-Project 8 - 0.4 sq. inch ACSR (Zebra) from Dhanonda to Pali (Gurgaon)
1. Fairly dense Babul on Panchayat Land of Pali enroute of the proposed transmission line
2. Lawan distributary enroute of the proposed transmission line
3. Agricultural field enroute of the proposed transmission line
4. PWD road enroute of the proposed transmission line
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 70
Sub-Project 9 - LILO of 132 KV S/C Hansi- Namaud line at Masudpur (Hansi)
1. Road Crossing 2. View of Agricultural Land
3. Existing line from which LILO is proposed 4. Tower of existing just before end point
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 71
Sub-Project 10 - LILO Chandauli line at Kabri (Panipat)
1. Proposed route of the transmission line 2. Industries in way of the proposed allignment
Consultancy Service for the preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank aided project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 72
ANNEXURE – III : PROPOSED TRANSMISSION LINE ON TOPOGRAPHIC SHEET
Sub-project 1
Consultancy Service for the preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank aided project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 73
ANNEXURE – III : PROPOSED TRANSMISSION LINE ON TOPOGRAPHIC SHEET
Sub-project 2
Consultancy Service for the preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank aided project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 74
ANNEXURE – III : PROPOSED TRANSMISSION LINE ON TOPOGRAPHIC SHEET
Sub-project 3
Consultancy Service for the preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank aided project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 75
ANNEXURE – III : PROPOSED TRANSMISSION LINE ON TOPOGRAPHIC SHEET
Sub-project 4
Consultancy Service for the preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank aided project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 76
ANNEXURE – III : PROPOSED TRANSMISSION LINE ON TOPOGRAPHIC SHEET
Sub-project 5
Consultancy Service for the preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank aided project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 77
ANNEXURE – III : PROPOSED TRANSMISSION LINE ON TOPOGRAPHIC SHEET
Sub-project 6
Consultancy Service for the preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank aided project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 78
ANNEXURE – III : PROPOSED TRANSMISSION LINE ON TOPOGRAPHIC SHEET
Sub-project 7
Consultancy Service for the preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank aided project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 79
ANNEXURE – III : PROPOSED TRANSMISSION LINE ON TOPOGRAPHIC SHEET
Sub-project 8
Consultancy Service for the preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank aided project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 80
ANNEXURE – III : PROPOSED TRANSMISSION LINE ON TOPOGRAPHIC SHEET
Sub-project 9
Consultancy Service for the preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank aided project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 81
ANNEXURE – III : PROPOSED TRANSMISSION LINE ON TOPOGRAPHIC SHEET
Sub-project 10
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 82
ANNEXURE – IV : ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
Project Activity / Stage
Potential Impact Mitigation Measures Parameters to be Monitored
Measurement and Frequency
Institutional responsibility
Pre construction / Design Phase
Selection of alignment
1. Impact on habitations/Settlements 2. Impact on trees / plantations 3. Impact on eco-sensitive areas
1. Avoidance of:
Human settlements and grazing land
Environmental sensitive locations such as school, colleges, hospitals, religious structures, monuments etc
Notified Eco-sensitive locations and dense plantation
State / National / International boundaries
Socially, Culturally, Archaeologically sensitive area
2. Consultation with local villagers and relevant authorities
Nearest distance from:
Human settlements and grazing land
Environmental sensitive locations such as school, colleges, hospitals, religious structures, monuments etc
Notified Eco-sensitive locations and dense plantation
State / National / International boundaries
Socially, Culturally, Archaeologically sensitive area
Part of detailed design survey
HVPNL
Location of transmission towers.
Exposure to safety related risks Impact on water bodies, railway lines, roads etc
1. Setback of dwellings to overhead line route designed in accordance with permitted level of power frequency and the regulation of supervision at site
2. Avoidance of location of towers nearest to the water bodies, railway lines and roads at maximum extent possible
3. Consultation with local villagers and landowners
Tower Location and alignment selection with respect to the nearest dwellings and nearby water bodies, railway lines and roads
Distance to nearest houses, water bodies, railway lines and roads
HVPNL
Transmission line design crossing the existing transmission line(s)
Exposure to electromagnetic interference
Transmission line design to comply with the limit of exposure to electromagnetic interference from overhear power lines
Electromagnetic field strength for proposed line design
Line design compliance with relevant standards
HVPNL
Transmission line through forest
Loss of biodiversity 1. Avoid encroachment by careful site and alignment selection
Tower location and alignment nearest or within
1. Tower Location 2. Consultation with
HVPNL
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 83
Project Activity / Stage
Potential Impact Mitigation Measures Parameters to be Monitored
Measurement and Frequency
Institutional responsibility
land / jungle (if necessary)
2. Minimise the need by using existing towers, tall towers and ROW wherever possible
3. Obtaining forest clearance as necessary
the forest area / jungle local villagers and forest department
3. Consultation with design engineers
Air Craft hazards from Tower
Nearest Air port and distance
The site should be at appropriate distance from nearest air port/air force station etc.
Distance from nearest Air port
The site should be at appropriate distance from nearest air port/air force station etc.
HPVNL
Equipments submerged under flood
Contamination of receptors (soil, water etc)
Avoid location of towers above high flood level Land above high flood level Base height as per flood design
HVPNL
Equipment Specifications and design parameters
Release of Chemicals and gases in receptors
1. Pollution Control equipments to be used in Substation transformers or other project facilities or equipment.
2. Process, equipment and system not to use CFCs including halon, and their use, if any, in existing processes and systems should be phased out and to be disposed off in a manner consistent with the requirement of the government
1. Transformers design 2. Process, equipment
and design
Once during design phase
HVPNL
Designing drainage pattern
Impact on groundwater and nearby agricultural field
Appropriate mitigation measures to be adopted in the design itself to avoid accidental hazards in the drainage system
Ground condition for flow of drain water
Part of detailed design survey
HVPNL
Explosions / Fire Hazards to life 1. Design to include modern fire control system / firewalls
2. Provision of fire fighting equipments close to transformers
Design in compliance with fire prevention and control codes
Design specification HVPNL
Tree cutting on private land
Impact on environment
Tree plantation in case of cutting tress on private land
Number of tree to be cut HPVNL
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 84
Project Activity / Stage
Potential Impact Mitigation Measures Parameters to be Monitored
Measurement and Frequency
Institutional responsibility
Construction Phase
Equipment layout and installation
Noise and Vibrations
Construction techniques and machinery selection seeking to minimize ground disturbance
Construction techniques and machinery
Construction techniques and machinery creating minimal ground disturbance-once at the start of construction phase
Contractor/ HPVNL
Physical Construction
Disturbed nearby farming activities
Construction activities on land timed to avoid disturbance on the nearby field crops (within 1 month of harvest wherever possible)
Time period of available field crop
Crop disturbance- post harvest
Crops – once
Contractor/ HPVNL
Mechanized Construction
Noise and Vibration The machines should be properly fitted with silencers
Regular maintenance of constructional equipments
Turning off plant when not in use
Constructional equipments Once at the start of constructional activities and at least once during middle of construction stage
Contractor/ HPVNL
Construction of roads for accessibility
Increase in airborne dust particles
Existing roads and tracks used for construction and maintenance access to the line wherever possible
Access roads, routes (length and width of new access roads to be constructed) nearest dwelling or social institution
Use of established roads wherever possible every 2 weeks
HVPNL/ Contractor
Minimise need to acquire agriculture land Tower location and line alignment selection (distance to agricultural land)
Consultation with local authorities and land owners- Once
HVPNL/ Contractor
Vehicular movement during Construction
Danger to local villagers
Safety awareness program among the villagers prior to construction
Safe movement of the construction vehicles
Safe driving of construction vehicle
Contractor/ HPVNL
Temporary blockage of utilities
Overflows or discharge
Temporary filling in nearby drains not to be permitted
Temporary fill placement (m3)
Checking nearby drains every 4 weeks
Contractor/ HPVNL
Site Clearance Vegetation Minimum disturbance to vegetation shall be permitted due to tower errection.
Vegetation marking and clearance control
Clearance strictly limited to target vegetation
Contractor/ HPVNL
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 85
Project Activity / Stage
Potential Impact Mitigation Measures Parameters to be Monitored
Measurement and Frequency
Institutional responsibility
Tree cutting or Trimming of trees within ROW
1. Fire hazards, 2. Loss of
vegetation and biodiversity
1. Trees allowed to grow up at specified height within ROW by maintaining adequate clearance between the tree top and the conductor as per regulation
2. Trees that can survive pruning to comply should be pruned instead of cleared
3. Pruned trees or felled trees to be disposed off with consultation to the respective Forest Department.
4. Compensatory afforestation for the each tree felled.
1. Species specific tree retention as approved by statutory authorities (maximum height at maturity)
2. Disposal off felled trees as complied by Forest Department.
3. Compensatory afforestation for the each tree felled.
1. Presence of target species in ROW following vegetation clearance - once
2. No. of trees planted as compensatory afforestation
Contractor/ HPVNL
Encroachment into precious ecological area
Loss of precious ecological values/ damages to precious species
Avoid encroachment by careful site and alignment selection
Tower location and line alignment selection (distance to nearest designated ecological protection area)
Consultation with local forest authorities to avoid / minimize forest involvement-Once
Contractor/ HPVNL
Transmission line through forest land
Deforestation and loss of biodiversity
By careful site and alignment selection Line alignment selection (distance to nearest protected or reserve forest)
Sitting and alignment survey/ design- Local authorities-Once
Contractor/ HPVNL
Obtain statutory clearances from the Government
Statutory approvals from Government
Compliance with regulation-Once for each transmission line
Contractor/ HPVNL
Tower construction-Disposal of surplus Earthwork/ fill
1. Accidental runoff and
2. Solid waste
disposal can cause groundwater contamination
1. Excess fill from tower foundations excavation (being fertile top soil) shall be used in backfilling while erection of towers and the remaining to be spread in the nearby agricultural fields.
2. Regular check over accidental spillage 3. Excavated unsuitable material shall be
disposed off at proper location
1. Type and quantity of spillage
2. Soil disposal location and volume(m3)
1. Appropriate fill disposal sites- every two weeks
2. Acceptable solid waste disposal sites- every 2 weeks.
Contractor/ HPVNL
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 86
Project Activity / Stage
Potential Impact Mitigation Measures Parameters to be Monitored
Measurement and Frequency
Institutional responsibility
Storage of constructional materials
Accidental contamination in groundwater
Fuel and other hazardous materials to be stored securely.
Location of hazardous material, spill reports (type of chemical spilled and quantity, etc)
Fuel storage location and regular check over the same
Contractor/ HPVNL
Provision of facilities to the constructional workers
Contamination of receptors (land, air, water)
Proper sanitation, water supply and waste disposal facilities
Amenities of workforce facilities
Presence of proper sanitation, water supply and waste disposal facilities
Contractor/ HPVNL
Health and Safety of Workers
Injury and Sickness 1. Safety equipments for constructional workers
2. Contract provisions specifying minimum requirements for construction camps
3. Contractor to prepare and implement health and safety camps
4. Contractor to arrange for health and safety training sessions
Safety provision during construction; and Contract provision for safety issue
Contract clauses compliance – once every quarter
Contractor/ HPVNL
Inadequate Construction stage monitoring
Likely to maximize damages
1. Training of environmental monitoring personnel
2. Implementation of effective environmental monitoring and reporting system using checklist of all contractual environmental requirements
3. Appropriate contract clauses to ensure satisfactory implementation of contractual environmental mitigation measures
1. Training Schedules 2. Respective contract
checklist and remedial actions taken thereof.
3. Compliance report related to environmental aspects for the contract
1. Number of programs attended by each person – once a year
2. Submission of duty completed checklists of all contracts for each site – once
3. Submission of duty completed compliance report for each site – once
Contractor/ HPVNL
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 87
Project Activity / Stage
Potential Impact Mitigation Measures Parameters to be Monitored
Measurement and Frequency
Institutional responsibility
Encroachment to cultivable land
Permanent loss of production
1. Irrigation facilities not to be disturbed 2. Prevent / preserve top soil just after
construction 3. Compensation to the farmers for the loss in
production
1. Status and usage of existing facilities
2. Implementation of compensation being paid for damaged crops
Consultation with land owners and local villagers
HPVNL
Operational Phase
Location of towers and transmission line alignment and design
Exposure to Safety related risks
Setback of dwellings to overhead line route designed in accordance with permitted level of power frequency and the regulation of supervision at sites
Compliance with setback distance (“as built” diagram)
Setback distances to nearest houses –once in quarter
HVPNL
Workers’ health and safety
Injury and Sickness / Health hazards
1. Careful design 2. Safety awareness 3. Fire emergency plan 4. Training and capacity building 5. Adequate sanitation and medical facilities
Usage of appropriate technologies, Awareness amongst the staff, provision of facilities etc
1. Capacity building and training – once a year
2. Complaints received from staff – every two weeks
HVPNL
Electric Shock hazards
Injury / Mortality 1. Careful design 2. Safety awareness 3. Fire emergency plan 4. Security fences around substation 5. Barriers to prevent climbing 6. Warning signals
1. Proper maintenance of fences, barriers, signals etc
2. No. of injuries and accidents
Every month HVPNL
Transmission Line maintenance
Exposure to electromagnetic interference
Transmission line design to comply with the limits of electromagnetic interference from overhead power lines
Required ground clearance (meters)
Ground clearance - Once
HVPNL
Operation and maintenance staff skills less than acceptable
Unnecessary environmental losses of various types
1. Adequate training to all the staff 2. Preparation and training in the use of O and
M manuals and standard operating practices
Training / Mock drills for all the staff
Number of programs and number of staff covered – once every year
HVPNL
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 88
Project Activity / Stage
Potential Impact Mitigation Measures Parameters to be Monitored
Measurement and Frequency
Institutional responsibility
Environmental monitoring
Inadequate Environmental monitoring will cause diminished ecological and social values
Staff to receive training of environmental monitoring at various point of time during operation
1. Environmental and social parameters
2. Training / Mock drills / Awareness for all the staff
1. Environmental parameters-every 6 months
2. Number of programs and number of staff covered – once every year
HVPNL
Noise generating equipments
Nuisance to neighbouring properties
Equipments to be well installed with noise absorbing techniques
Noise level in dB (A) Every month or as desired in consultation with affected parties (if any)
HVPNL
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 89
ANNEXURE – V : ATTENDANCE OF PUBLIC CONSULTATION
Sub-Project 1 - 220 kV D/C Sector 72, Gurgaon to Rangla Rajpur (Firozpur Zirka) line
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 90
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 91
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 92
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 93
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 94
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 95
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 96
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 97
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 98
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 99
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 100
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 101
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 102
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 103
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 104
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 105
Sub-Project -2 220 kV D/C line from Nawada (Faridabad) to A-6 Faridabad
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 106
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 107
Sub-Project 3 - LILO Mayar (PGCIL Hisar) S/Stn to Isherwal S/Stn at Sangwan (Tosham)
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 108
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 109
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 110
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 111
Sub-Project 4- 220 kV D/C line with 400 KV S/Stn PKL to 220 KV S/Stn Raiwalli (Panchkula)
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 112
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 113
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 114
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 115
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 116
Sub-Project 5 - LILO of Panchkula- Tepla Line at Raiwali (Panchkula)
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 117
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 118
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 119
Sub-Project 6 - LILO of 132 KV Isherwal- Jui S/C Line at Kairu (Bhiwani)
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 120
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 121
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 122
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 123
Sub-Project 7 - 0.4 sq. inch ACSR (Zebra) from Dhanonda to Nangal Mohanpur (Mohindergarh)
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 124
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 125
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 126
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 127
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 128
Sub-Project 8 - 0.4 sq. inch ACSR (Zebra) from Dhanonda to Pali (Gurgaon)
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 129
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 130
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 131
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 132
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 133
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 134
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 135
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 136
Sub-Project 9 - LILO of 132 KV S/C Hansi- Namaud line at Masudpur (Hansi)
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 137
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 138
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 139
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 140
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 141
Consultancy Service for Preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank Aided Project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6 142
Sub-Project 10 - LILO Chandauli line at Kabri (Panipat)
Consultancy Service for the preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank aided project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6
APPENDIX I : MoEF NOTIFICATION ON ARAVALLI HILLS
MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT & FORESTS
NOTIFICATION
New Delhi, the 7th May 1992
(Under Section 3(1) and 3(2) (v) of the Environment Protection) Act, 1986 and rule 5 (3) (d) of the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 restricting certain activities in specified area of Aravalli Range, which are causing Environmental Degradation in the Region. S.O. 319 (E) - Whereas a Notification under section 3 (1) and section 3 (2) (v) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (29 of 1986) inviting objections against restricting certain activities in specified area of Aravalli Range which are causing Environmental Degradation in the Region was published in the Gazette of India, Part II-Section 3 Sub-section (ii) vide S. O. 25 (E) dated 9th January, 1992; And whereas all objections received have been duly considered by the Central Government; Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) and clause (v) of sub-section (2), of section 3 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (29 of 1986), read with rule 5 of the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986, the Central Government hereby prohibits the carrying on of the following process and operations, except with its prior permission, in the areas specified in the Table appended to this Notification:
(i) Location of any new industry including expansion modernisation; (ii) (a) All new mining operations including renewals of mining
leases. (b) Existing mining leases in sanctuaries/national Park and areas covered under Project Tiger and/or (c) Mining is being done without permission of the competent authority.
(iii) Cutting of trees; (iv) Construction of any clusters of dwelling units, farms houses,
sheds, community centres, information centres and any other activity connected with such construction (including roads a part of any infrastructure relating thereto);
(v) Electrification (laying of new transmission lines).
2. Any person who desires to undertake any of the above mentioned processes or
operations in the said areas, shall submit an application to the Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi, in the attached application form (Annexure) specifying, inter alia, details of the area and the proposed process or operation. He shall also furnish an Environment Impact Statement and an Environmental Management Plan along with the application and such other information as may be required by the Central Government for considering the application.
3. The Central Government in the Ministry of Environment and Forests shall, having
regard to the guidelines issued by it from time to time for giving effect to the provisions of the said Act, grant permission within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the application or where further information has been asked for from the applicant, within a period of three months from the date of the receipt of such information, or refuse permission within the said time on the basis of the impact of the proposed process or operation on the environment in the said area.
4. For seeking permission under this Notification, an application in the prescribed
form (see Annexure), duly filled in, may be submitted to the Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Paryavaran Bhavan, CGO Complex, Lodi Road, New Delhi.
[No. 17/1/91-PL/IA]
R. RAJAMANI, Secy.
TABLE Areas where carrying on of processes and operations without permission is prohibited
(i) all reserved forests, protected forests or any other area shown as "forest in the land records maintained by the State Government as on the date of this notification in relation to Gurgaon District of the State of Haryana and the Alwar District of the State of Rajasthan.
(ii) All areas shown as: -
(a) Gair Mumkin Pahar, or (b) Gair Mumkin Rada, or (c) Gair Mumkin Behed, or (d) Banjad Beed, or (e) Rundh.
in the land records maintained by the State Government as on the date of this notification in relation to Gurgaon district of the State of Haryana and the Alwar district of the State of Rajasthan. (iii) all areas covered by notifications issued under section 4 and 5 of the
Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900, as applicable to the State of Haryana in the district of Gurgaon up to the date of this Notification.
(iv) all areas of Sariska National Park and Sariska Sanctuary notified under the
Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 (53 of 1972).
ANNEXURE
APPLICATION FORM
1. (a) Name & address of the project proposed: (b) Location of the project:
Name of the Place: District, Tehsil: Location Map:
(c) Alternate sites examined and the reasons for the site proposed:
2. Objectives of the project: 3. (a) Land Requirement:
Agriculture land: Other (specify):
(b) (i) Topography of the area indicating gradient, aspect & altitude. (ii) Erodability classification of the proposed land.
(c) Pollution sources existing within 10 km. Radius. (d) Distance of the nearest National Park/Sanctuary/Biosphere
Reserve/Monuments/heritage site/Reserve Forest: (e) Rehabilitation plan for Quarries/borrow areas : (f) Green belt plan. (g) Compensatory afforestation plan.
4. Climate & Air Quality*:
(a) Wind rose at site: (b) Max. /Min./Mean annual temperature.
(c) Ambient air quality data: (d) Nature & concentration of emission of SPM, Gases (CO, CO2, SO2, NOx
etc.) from the project:
5. ** (a) Water balance at site surface and ground water availability and demand: (b) Lean season water availability: (c) Water source to be tapped with details of competing users (Rivers, lake,
Ground, Public supply): (d) Water Quality: (e) Changes observed in quantity and quality of water in the last 15 years and
present charging and extraction details: (f) (i) Quantum of waste water to be released with treatment details:
(ii) Quantum & Quality of water in the receiving water body: (iii) Quantum of waste water to be released on land and the type of
land: 6. Solid Wastes:
(a). Nature & quantity of solid wastes generated: (b). Solid waste disposal method:
7. Noise & vibrations:
(a) Sources of noise & vibrations: (b) Ambient noise level: (c) Noise & vibration control measures proposed: (d) Subsidence problem, if any, with control measures:
8. Power requirement indicating source of supply; complete environmental details to be
furnished separately, if captive power unit proposed: 9. Total labour force to be deployed with details of:
- Endemic health problems in the area. - Health care system proposed:
10. (a) Number of families and population to be displaced : (b) Rehabilitation Master Plan: 11. Risk assessment report: 12. (a) Environmental Impact Assessment Report :
(b) Environmental Management Plan: Prepared as per Guidelines of MEF issued from time to time.
(c) Detailed Feasibility Report: (d) Proposal for diversion of Forestland under Forest (Conservation) Act,
1980 including Benefit Cost analysis.
13. Recommendations of the State Pollution Control Board and/or the State Department of Environment & Forests.
Signature of the Applicant Along with name, date and
full Postal address.
*Data may be obtained from India Meteorological Department and State Pollution Control Board. **Ground water Board and the Irrigation Deptt. May be contacted for data. N.B. A. Item Nos. 3(c), 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12 (b) and 12 (c) are not applicable to cutting of
trees. B. Item Nos. 3(c), 4, 7, 11 are not applicable to construc tion of cluster of dwelling units,
farm sheds, community centre and any other activity connected with such construction including roads.
C. Item Nos. 3(b), 3(c) (3e), 3(f), 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12(a) & 12(b) are not applicable to
electrification. D. All items to be furnished in case of mining, industry, thermal power, transport
projects. E. Notwithstanding the above, any item(s) considered not applicable may be so indicated
along with reasons.
*****
Consultancy Service for the preparation of RRAP and EMP for World Bank aided project of HVPNL
Preliminary EMP – Package G6
APPENDIX 2 : LETTER ON CLARIFICATION FOR FOREST CONSTRAINTS – SUB-PROJECT 6
Recommended