View
219
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Proceedingsofthe
11thMountainLionWorkshopIntegratingScientificFindingsintoManagement
HunterConferenceCenter,SouthernUtahUniversity
CedarCity,Utah
May12‐15,2014
Sanctionedby:
WesternAssociationofFishandWildlifeAgencies
WAFWAAgencyHost:UtahDepartmentofWildlifeResources
WorkshopCo‐Host:
WildFelidResearchandManagementAssociation(WFA)
WorkshopOrganizingCommittee:
OrganizingCommittee
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
1
WorkshopOrganizingCommittee:
JohnShivikUtahDivisionofWildlifeResources
johnshivik@utah.gov*
LindaSweanorWildFelidResearchandManagementAssociation
lsweanor@gmail.com
DavidStonerUtahStateUniversitydavid.stoner@usu.edu
DanCockayne
UtahHoundsmenAssociationDanc@sandlinc.com
MichaelWolfe
UtahStateUniversity(emeritus)michael.wolfe@usu.edu
TeresaGriffin
UtahDivisionofWildlifeResourcesteresagriffin@utah.gov
*Presentaddress:johnashivik@fs.fed.us
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
3
SUGGESTEDCITATION
Completevolume:Shivik,J,andL.Sweanor,editors.2014.Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLion
Workshop,May12‐15,2014.CedarCity,Utah,USA.
Individualarticle/abstract:Author’sname(s).2014.Titleofarticleorabstract.Pages00‐00inShivik,J.andL.
Sweanor,editors.Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop.May12‐15,2014.CedarCity,Utah,USA.
ThecompleteproceedingsareavailableattheWFAwebsites:www.wildlife.utah.govhttp://www.wildfelid.org
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
4
Preface
ChronologyofMountainLionWorkshops: 1stMountainLionWorkshop–Sparks,Nevada
2ndMountainLionWorkshop– St.George,Utah3rdMountainLionWorkshop– Prescott,Arizona4thMountainLionWorkshop– Denver,Colorado5thMountainLionWorkshop– SanDiego,California6thMountainLionWorkshop– SanAntonio,Texas7thMountainLionWorkshop– JacksonHole,Wyoming8thMountainLionWorkshop– Leavenworth,Washington9thMountainLionWorkshop– SunValley,Idaho10thMountainLionWorkshop–Bozeman,Montana11thMountainLionWorkshop– CedarCity,Utah
The11thMountainLionWorkshopwasheldatSouthernUtahUniversityinCedarCity,UtahfromMay12to15,2014.Thethemeoftheworkshopwas“IntegratingScientificFindingsintoManagement.”Dr.JohnLinnell,NorwegianInstituteforNatureResearch,Trondheim,Norway,gavetheKeynoteAddress.Dr.Linnell’sinspiringpresentationontheecologyandstatusofEurasianlynxprovidedmanycomparableinsightstomountainlions,anotherwidespreadspecieswithahighlyvariablestatus.AttheWednesdaynightbanquetDr.MikeWolfe,EmeritusProfessoratUtahStateUniversity,gaveanotherexcellentpresentationwithatalkentitled“Predation:theroadfrommythtoreason.”
Sessiontopicsincluded:stateandprovincereports;felidecology,conservationandpopulations;predatorsandprey;felidsandhumans;non‐invasivetechniques;andmanagementstrategies.Allofthepresentationswereprofessional,timely,andwell‐attended.PresentationsfocusedonpumaresearchandmanagementinthewesternU.S.(including3onrecentlyrecolonizedpopulationsintheDakotas)andCanada,withtwoadditionaltalksontheFloridaPanther.ToprovideinsightsintopumamanagementandconservationconcernsoutsideofNorthAmerica,WFAsponsoredDr.MauroLucherini,UniversidadNacionaldelSurinArgentina,whosetalkexaminedpuma‐livestockconflictsintheEspinalofCentralArgentina.
Alongwithover50presentations,fifteenpostersweredisplayed,withtopicscoveringdiseases,feedingecologyanddiet,orphans,GPSlocationclusteranalysis,rangeexpansion,effectsofambientlight,comparisonsofnoninvasiveandinvasivemethodsofpopulationmonitoring,compensatoryandadditivemortality,andpuma‐humanconflicts.Twosessionsincludedfollow‐uppaneldiscussions.Duringa2‐hour,WFA‐sponsoredsessionWednesdaymorning,DavidStonermoderatedapredator‐preysessionthatincluded5invitedspeakers(BeckyPierce,DavidChoate,AlysonAndreasen,JeffVillepique,andMarkHurley)withintimateknowledgeaboutspecificpredator‐preysystems.Presentersdiscussedtop‐downversusbottom‐up
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
5
forcesonapuma‐deersystem,thepotentialofwatersourcestofunctionasecologicaltrapsformuledeerandbighornsheep,pumaspecializationonnovelprey(feralhorses),rangeabandonmentbybighornsheep,andthedemographicresponseofdeertoexperimentalreductionsofcoyotesandpumas.Laterthatsameday,JohnShivikmoderatedasessiononpuma‐humanconflictthatincludedshortpresentationsandapaneldiscussionbyindividualsfrom6differentinterestgroups:sport‐hunters,houndsmen,livestockranchers,animaldamagemanagement(WildlifeServices),pumaadvocacy–philosophicalaspects,andpumaadvocacy–scienceaspects.Thetopicquestionwas“Howshouldwebalancepumaconservationwithpredatorpopulationreduction?”Thissessionwaswell‐receivedandmanyattendeesthoughtthatsimilarpaneldiscussionsshouldbeofferedatfutureworkshops.
Therewere188registeredworkshopparticipants.Wereceived$29,651.61inregistrationfees,contributions,sponsorships,andvendorfees.Weexpended$24,227.78whichleftuswith$5,423.83whichwassenttoWAFWAandwillbeavailableforthenextworkshop.Eachworkshopregistrantwasprovidedwithasatchelandbeaniewiththeconferencelogo.Thankstoalloftheparticipants,attendees,organizers,moderators,andvolunteersformakingthisasuccessfulworkshop!AspecialthankstoDivisionstaffwhoactedaboveandbeyondtheirnormaldutiesbyassistingwithregistration,refreshments,andrunningtheconference.TheyincludeNatalieBrewster‐Wilson,MindiCox,TroyDavis,DarrenDebloois,StephanieRainy,andHeatherTalley.KenLogan,CarnivoreResearcherwithColoradoParksandWildlife,requestedthatColoradohostthenext(12th)workshopin2017;allagreed.Theexactworkshoplocationwillbedeterminedatalaterdate.
JohnShivikmoderatingtheFelidsandHumanspaneldiscussion.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
6
THE11thMOUNTAINLIONWORKSHOPAgenda
Monday,12MayEveningSocial,Registration4:00–8:00p.m.IronGateInn,100N200WSt,CedarCity,UT84720Tuesday,13May8:15 Welcome–JohnShivik(UtahDepartmentofWildlifeResources)PlenarySession1–State&ProvincialReportsModerator:JohnShivik8:30 Utahmountainlionstatusreport,JohnShivik(UDWR)
8:45 Wyomingmountainlionstatusreport,JustinClapp(WDG&F)
9:00 Idahomountainlionstatusreport,JimHayden(IDF&G)
9:15 Floridapantherstatusreport,MarcCriffield(FFWCC)
9:30 Nevadamountainlionstatusreport,CarlLackey(NDW)
9:45 Washingtonmountainlionstatusreport,RichBeausoleil(WDF&W)
10:00 Californiamountainlionstatusreport,MarcKenyon10:15 Break10:30 Albertamountainlionstatusreport,JayHoneyman
10:45 Nebraskamountainlionstatusreport,SamWilson
11:00 NewMexicomountainlionstatusreport,EliseGoldstein(NMDG&F)
11:15 Montanamountainlionstatusreport,JimWilliams(MFW&P)
11:30 Arizonamountainlionstatusreport,AprilHoward(ADG&F)
11:45 NorthDakotamountainlionstatusreport,StephanieTucker12:00 Lunch
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
7
PlenarySession2:KeynoteIntroduction:DavidStoner,UtahStateUniversity
1:00 Abigcatinasmallbody:DoEurasianlynxhavewhatittakestosurvivetheAnthropocene?Dr.JohnLinnell,NorwegianInstituteforNatureResearch
PlenarySession3:FelidEcology,Conservation,&Populations,Part1Moderator:TeresaGriffin 2:00 Potentialbarriersrestrictinggeneflowamongmountainlionsin
Arizona.AshwinNaidu.
2:20 Theimportanceofscaleandbehavioralstateinpumaresourceselectionfunctions.KathyZeller.
2:40 California’scougarconnectivity:geneticsinformingconservationandmanagement.HollyErnest.
3:00 Populationgeneticsofasmall,isolatedpopulationofmountainlions:Barriers,inbreeding,andgeneticrescue.SethRiley.
3:20 BreakPlenarySession4:FelidEcologyConservation,&Populations,Part2Moderator:TeresaGriffin3:40 Homerangecharacteristicsofasubordinatepredator:selectionfor
refugiaorpreyavailability?PatrickLendrum.
4:00 GeneticstructureofcougarsintheBlackHills,SouthDakota.RebecaJuarez.
4:20 IntegratingResourceSelectionandHarvestintoSpatialCapture‐RecaptureModelsforestimatingmountainlionabundance.KellyProffitt.
4:40 EvaluationofharvestindicescurrentlyusedforcougarmanagementinUtah:Oquirrh‐StansburyandMonroeunitsascasestudies.MikeWolfe.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
8
5:00 SurvivalratesofcougarsinOregonfrom1989–2011:aretrospectiveanalysis.DarrenClark.
5:20 UsingDNAtoevaluatefieldidentificationofcougargenderbyagencystaffandhuntersusingtraineddogs.RichBeausoleil.
PlenarySession5:PostersPosterstobedisplayedduringentireconferenceintheYankeeMeadowsandVermillionCliffsRooms.Presentersinattendancefrom5:40‐6:40.
PeterAlexander.Cameratrappingvsradio‐telemetry:acomparisonofnoninvasiveandinvasivemethodsformonitoringcougarpopulations.
RichBeausoleil.OrphanedkittensinWashingtonresultinadecadeofnationwidecougareducation.
LinseyBlake.ForagingpatternsofcougarsinthePryorMountainsofWyomingandMontana.
KevinBlecha.ImprovementsonGPSlocationclusteranalysistechniquesforpredictingfeedingactivities.
MarcCriffield.Trichinellaintwodisjunctpopulationsofpuma.
AaronGhaemi.ConfirmedmountainlionsinOklahoma.
BenjaminMaltetzke.Cougarresponsetoresidentialdevelopment.
RickMinter.WildpumasinBritain–exploringevidenceandgaugingpeople’sattitudes.
JohnOdden.Theecologyofaconflict:Eurasianlynxdepredationondomesticsheepandsemi‐domesticreindeerinNorway.
OmarOhrens.Therelationshipofruraldepopulationtopuma‐humanconflictintheAltiplanoregionofTarapacá,Chile.
SadiePerrin.Effectsofpumasex,season,andhabitattypeondiet.
Scarlett Sellers. Effects of ambient light on puma, deer, and elk activity.
JeffSikich.P22:WillthismountainlionmakeitinHollywood?
AlexViere.Pumaactivityandmesocarnivores.
MikeWolfe.Compensationandadditivityincougarmortality:learningfromheavilyandlightlyharvestedpopulations.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
9
Wednesday,14MayPlenarySession6:PredatorsandPrey,Part1Moderator:DavidStoner8:20 ProgramCluster:identifyingpredationeventsthroughclusteredGPS
data.PeterMahoney.
8:40 Cougarstrategiesoffeedingsiteselection:energymaximization,classicaloptimalforaging,orfeardrivenhumanaversion?KevinBlecha.
9:00 Estimatingmountainlion(Pumaconcolor)predationratesintherecentlyrecolonizedregionoftheLittleMissouriBadlands,NorthDakota,USA.DavidT.Wilckens.
9:20 Estimatingcougar(Pumaconcolor)consumptionratesandpreycompositionintheBlackHills,SouthDakota.JoshuaSmith.
9:40 Nowheretohide:pumas,blackbearsandcompetitionrefuges.MarkElbroch.
10:00 BreakPlenarySession7:PredatorsandPrey,Part2Moderator:DavidStoner10:20 Top‐downversusbottom‐upforcing:evidencefrommountainlionsand
muledeer.BeckyPierce.
10:35 CougarpredationintheMojaveDesert:seasonalspatio‐temporaloverlapinfluencespreyselectionmorethanwateruse.DavidChoate.
10:50 VariationinpreyselectionandincidenceofindividualspecializationonnovelpreyintheGreatBasin.AlysonM.Andreasen.
11:05 Rangeabandonmentbyungulates:Predatoravoidanceorresponsetohabitatchangesinducedbydrought?JeffreyVillepique.
11:20 Demographicresponseofmuledeertoexperimentalreductionofcoyotesandmountainlions.MarkHurley.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
10
11:35 PanelDiscussion
12:05 Lunch
PlenarySession8:FelidsandHumans,Part1Moderator:LindaSweanor1:20 Cougarspaceuseonalandscapewithhighlevelsofanthropogenic
disturbanceinsouth‐centralUtah.JulieYoung.
1:40 Correlatesofpuma‐livestockconflictsintheEspinalofCentralArgentina.(SponsoredbyWFA)MauroLucherini.
2:00 RoadimpactsonmountainlionsinOrangeCounty,California:usingmultipledatatypestoprioritizemanagementactions.PatrickHuber.
2:20 AnoverviewofpumadepredationtrendsinCalifornia,1972‐2013.AnneOrlando.
2:40 Floridapantherrecovery:Livestockdepredation,predationriskmaps,andnewapproachestocompensationprograms.CaitlinJacobs.
3:00 Break
PlenarySession9:FelidsandHumans,Part2Moderator:JohnShivik3:20 Anintegratedregionaloutreachandresearchmodelforwildlife
conservationacrosstheSanFranciscoBayArea.AnneOrlando
3:40 ByronBateman,representingsportsmen(deerhunters)
4:00 DanCocayne,representinghoundsmen
4:10 KirkRobinson,CougarAdvocate,representingphilosophicalaspects
4:20 BrettSelman,representinglivestockinterests
4:30 BobMcCoy,CougarAdvocate,representingscienceaspects
4:40 MikeBodenchuk,WildlifeServices,representinganimaldamagemanagement
4:50 PanelDiscussion:“Howshouldwebalancecougarconservationwithpredatorpopulationreduction?”
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
11
6:30 SocialandBanquetHeritageCenter,105North,100EastPresentation–Predation:theRoadfromMythtoReason
MikeWolfeThursday,May15PlenarySession10:Non‐invasiveTechniquesModerator:KenLogan8:20 EstimatingCougarDensitiesinnortheastOregonUsingConservation
DetectionDogs.GregoryDavidson.
8:40 DNA‐baseddietidentificationofmountainlionsinsouthwesternArizona.JohnClemons.
9:00 PumaPlex:Arapidandhigh‐throughputmethodtogenotypesinglenucleotidepolymorphismsinmountainliontissuesandscats.AlexIrwin.
9:20 LynxmonitoringinScandanavia.JohnOdden.
9:40 UseofcameratrapstoassesspreyavailabilityanddistributionrelativetomountainlionpredationintheDavisMountains,Texas.CatherineC.Dennison.
10:00 Break
PlenarySession11:ManagementStrategiesModerator:KenLogan10:20 Conservationofpumas(Pumaconcolor)inarapidlyurbanizing
landscape;researchinformingtheneedformoreaction.T.WinstonVickers.
10:40 Predation‐specificresourceselectionbycougarsinthePryorMountainsofWyomingandMontana.LinseyBlake.
11:00 TechniquesusedtoraiseorphanedFloridapanthersforreleasetothewild.MarkLotz.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
12
11:20 EffectsofRemedialSportHuntingonCougarComplaintsandLivestockDepredations.RobertB.Wielgus.
11:40 Researchtoregulation:cougarsocialbehaviorasaguideformanagement.RichBeausoleil.
12:00 Closingcomments,finalbusiness.
JohnLinnellandMikeWolfeoutsidetheHunterConferenceCenter.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
13
Session1:
StateandProvincialReports
Proceedingsofthe
11thMountainLionWorkshopIntegratingScientificFindingsintoManagement
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
14
EventsinUtah’sCougarManagement,2011‐2014JohnA.Shivik,UtahDivisionofWildlifeResources;johnshivik@utah.govAbstract:Utah’scurrentcougarmanagementplanwasapprovedbytheWildlifeBoardin2009.Theplanincorporatedaregionalmanagementapproachwherehuntingunitsweregroupedinecosystem‐sizedmanagementareas,andideasofsource‐sinkdynamicswereimplemented.Someunitswereassignedaslimitedentryunitsandothersasharvestobjectiveunits,withothersbeingahybridofthetwo,splitunits,whichopenedaslimitedentryunitsandthentransitionedintoharvestobjectiveunitsforthesecondpartoftheseason.Theplanwasdesignedtobefolloweduntil2021,withmanagementrecommendationsonlybeingmadeon3‐yearcycles.However,continuedcontroversyanddiscussionsledtofrequentrevisionsbytheWildlifeBoardduringthe2011‐2014timeframe.Someunitswereputontopredatormanagementplans,andsomewereassignedminimumharvests.Acomplexflow‐chartandseriesofrulesthatdictatedallocationofpermitswasdevised.Anotherunitwasclosedbyemergencyaction.Mostrecently,theDivisionhasbeengivendirectionbytheWildlifeBoardtosimplifytheplan,whichwehopetodobyreturningtoaunitbasedmanagementsystemthatincorporatesdatacollectionatanecosystemscale.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
15
AssessmentofPopulationTrendsandManagementStrategiesforMountainLionsinWyomingJustinG.Clapp,WyomingGameandFishDepartment,260BuenaVistaDr.,Lander,
WY82520,USA;Justin.Clapp@wyo.gov(presenter)DanielJ.Thompson,WyomingGameandFishDepartment,260BuenaVistaDr.,
Lander,WY82520,USAAbstract:In2007Wyomingbeganmanagingmountainlionpopulationsunderanadaptivemanagementplan,withharvestlimitssettoachievestable,source,orsinkpopulationobjectiveswithin5mountainlionmanagementunits(MLMUs)acrossthestate.Theannualmonitoringcriteriausedtoassesspopulationstatusprimarilyquantifiesthedensityofhuman‐causedmortality/1,000km2ofsuitablewintermountainlionhabitat,proportionofadultfemalesintheharvest,andthemeanageofadultfemalesharvested.Mountainlionmanagementstrategiesandharvestlimitsareproposedona3‐yearcycletoassesspopulationtrendandefficacyofmanagementstrategies.Harvestyear2012markedtheendofthesecond3‐yearcycleunderthismanagementplan,andweprovideanupdateontheeffectivenessofthestrategytosustainmountainlionpopulationsthroughoutsuitablehabitatatvaryingdensitiesforeachMLMUinWyoming. INTRODUCTIONIn2007,Wyomingbeganmanagingmountainlionpopulationsunderanadaptivemanagementplan,withharvestlimitssettoachievestable,source,orsinkpopulationobjectiveswithinfivemountainlionmanagementunits(MLMUs)acrossthestate.
Primarymonitoringcriteriawereestablishedviaempiricallytestedresearch
(AndersonandLindzey2005),whichprovidedinsighttogeneraltrendsinmountainlionpopulationsundervariousconditionsandhuntingpressures.Telemetrydatawerecollectedfromasampleofvariouscohortsofmountainlionsthroughouttestandreferenceareaswithinthestate,andpopulationestimateswereestablishedthroughmark‐recapturetechniques.Locationdatafromthesesampleswerealsousedinaresourceselectionfunctionanalysistoestimateandmapsuitablemountainlionhabitat.Huntingpressurewasappliedtotestareastoincreasemountainlionmortalityandtoestimateamortalitydensitythatresultedindecreasingpopulationestimates.Whenhuntingpressurewasrestricted,mortalitydensitieswereagainestimatedtodeterminethelevelatwhichpopulationestimatesrebounded.Ageandsexcompositionofmortalitydatawerealsogatheredthroughoutthisprocess.Generally,asrelativemortalityincreased(numberofmortalities/unitareaofsuitablehabitat),ahigherproportionofadultfemaleswere
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
16
harvested,andtheaverageageofthosefemalesdecreased.Theoppositewastrueofthesetrendsasrelativemountainlionmortalitydecreasedacrossthelandscape.
Thesefindingswereusedasaframeworkfortheadaptivestatemanagement
plan(WGFD2006),whereprimarymonitoringcriteriacanbederivedthroughmountainlionmortalitydataincluding:(a)human‐causedmountainlionmortalitydensity/1,000km2suitablewinterhabitat,(b)proportionofadultfemalesharvested,(c)meanageofadultfemalesharvested.(Femalestatusisdeterminedbylactation.)Thesecriteriaareassessedatthehuntarealeveltodetermineastatusofsource,stable,orsinktrends.Primaryhuntareamanagementobjectivecriteriainclude:
1. Sinkmanagement:reducemountainliondensities
a) Maintaindensityofhuman‐causedmortality>8mountainlions/1,000km2(386mi2).
b) Achieveadultfemaleharvest>25%oftotalharvestfor2seasons.c) Progressioninmeanageofharvestedadultfemalesshoulddecline
to<5yearsold.
2. Sourcemanagement:maintainhuman‐causedmortalitylevelsthatallowmountainlionpopulationgrowthormaintainrelativelyhighmountainliondensitiesthatprovideasourcetootherpopulations.
a) Maintaindensityofhuman‐causedmortality<5mountainlions/1,000km2(386mi2)
b) Maintainadultfemaleharvest<20%oftotalharvest.c) Maintainolder‐ageadultfemalesinthepopulation(>5yearsold).
3. Stablemanagement:maximizelong‐termhuntingopportunityand
populationviability.
a) Maintainhuman‐causedmortalitydensitybetween5‐8mountainlions/1,000km2(386mi2)
b) Adultfemaleharvestshouldnotexceed25%oftotalharvestformorethan1season.
c) Maintainintermediateagedadultfemales(mean4‐6yearsold)intheharvest.
Inadditiontothehuntareacriteria,otherfactors(e.g.,totalage/sex
compositiontrends,huntereffort,andhunterselectivity)arealsoevaluatedwhenassessinghuntareaand/orMLMUpopulationtrends.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
17
Figure1.MountainlionHuntAreaandManagementUnitboundariesforWyoming,USAin2013.
Figure1showscurrentmountainlionhuntareasandMLMUsacross
Wyoming.Additionally,thewestMLMUispartitionedintoDataAnalysisUnits(DAUs)duetotheexpanseofcontiguoussuitablehabitatidentifiedthroughoutthewesternportionofthestate.TheseDAUsincludeAbsaroka(huntareas19and20),WindRiver(huntareas3,4,18,and28)andWyomingRange(huntareas2,14,17,26,and29).
MountainlionmanagementinWyomingusesthedescribedcriteriatoassess
trendsona3‐yearmanagementcycle,wherealterationstoobjectives,harvestlimits,seasons,andboundariesareminimizedduringamanagementcycletoprovidenecessarydatatodelineatetrendandavoidreactionarymanagementdecisionsbasedonvariationwithinanygivenharvestyear.The3‐yearmanagementcyclealsobolsterstheevaluationandclassificationofsink,stable,orsourceforhuntareasgivenpreviousdirectionintrends.Managingfora
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
18
combinationofsource,stable,andsinkmountainlionsubpopulationswithinMLMUs(i.e.,atthehuntarealevel)providesflexibilitytoaddresslocalmanagementconcerns(e.g.livestockdepredation,proximitytoresidentialareas)whilemaintainingoverallpopulationviabilityonalandscapelevelaswellaslong‐termharvestandrecreationalopportunities(WGFD2006).
Harvestyear2012(1Sept.2012–31Aug.2013)markedtheendofthe
second3‐yearcycleunderthemanagementplan,whichprovidedcompleteharvestdatainWyomingnecessarytoassesstheeffectivenessofthemountainlionmanagementstrategyacrosstwocompletemanagementcycles.Therefore,harvestdatacollectedafter31Aug.2013arenotincluded.ThesedataalsoincludeannuliagesforthemajorityofmountainlionmortalitiesinWyoming,providingmoreaccurateageestimationandclassificationsthanfieldpersonnelestimationsalone.WYOMINGMANAGEMENTOBJECTIVESANDPOPULATIONTRENDSWequantifiedhuntareaobjectivesbasedonmortalitydensitycriteria(a)thatwouldclassifysource,stable,orsinkmanagementforeachmountainlionhuntareathroughoutWyomingatthebeginningofeach3‐yearmanagementcycle.MortalitylimitssetforeachhuntareareflectrecommendationsincludingWGFDbiologistperspectives,public/landowner/sportsmencomments,andthepotentialforlivestockdepredation,humansafety,andpotentialimpactstosympatricpreypopulations.ThestatusforeachhuntareawasestimatedusingallWGFDmonitoringcriteria,andwascomparedtotheobjectivessetforeachmanagementcycle(Table1).Sincetheimplementationofthemanagementplanin2007,mosthuntareastatusmatchedobjectivessetinthemanagementstrategy,withapproximately82%matchingortrendingtowardobjectives.Allhuntareasthatdeviatedfromobjectivesresultedfromastatusthatwashigherthanthepotentialobjective,adirectreflectionofapproximately25%ofhuntareasclosingannuallyduetoreachingorexceedingsetmortalitylimitspriortoseasonalclosuredates.Sixhuntareas(~21%total)adaptedmanagementattheendofthefirstcycletoincreaseallowablemortalitylimits,resultinginachangeinclassification(i.e.HAs1,3,6,13,22,and30),oneareachangedobjectiveclassificationbyreducingmortalitylimits(HA29).
Weusedtheproportionofmatchinghuntareaobjectivesasaroughestimate
toquantifytheeffectivenessofthemanagementplanatahuntarealevel,butitisimportanttoconsiderhowtheculminationofmountainlionmanagementatlocalscalesimpactthepopulation.Whenconsideringthehabitatthatsupportsinterconnectedmountainlionpopulationsstatewide,mortalitylimitsrevealedanoverallobjectivetoslightlyreducemountainlionpopulationsacrossthestate,andthemonitoringcriteriaweusedshowastatewidepopulationstatusthatistrendingtowardstabilityinthemountainlionpopulationinWyoming(Table1).
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
19
Table1.MountainlionhuntareaobjectivesvsstatusforfirstandsecondmanagementcyclesinWyoming.Objectivesarebasedonlyonpotentialmortalitydensities.StatusarebasedonallWGFDmonitoringcriteriaforeachmanagementcycle.
FirstCycle(HY2007‐HY2009)SecondCycle(HY2010‐
HY2012)
MLMU HuntArea Objective Status Objective Status
Northeast
HA1 Stable/Sink Sink Sink SinkHA30 Source Source Sink SinkHA32 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ Sink SinkHA24 MinimalHabitat NA MinimalHabitat NA
Northcentral
HA15 Sink Sink Sink Sink
HA21 Sink Sink Sink Sink
HA22 Stable Stable Sink Stable
HA23 Sink Sink Sink Sink
Southeast
HA5 Source Source Source Source
HA6 Source Source Stable Stable
HA7 Sink Stable→Sink Sink Stable→Sink
HA8 Stable Source Stable Source
HA9 Sink Stable/Sink Sink Stable/Sink
HA10 Sink Stable→Sink Sink Stable/Sink
HA16 Stable Stable Stable Source
HA25 MinimalHabitat NA MinimalHabitat NA
HA27 Sink Stable→Sink Sink Source
HA31 Stable Stable Stable Stable
SouthwestHA11 MinimalHabitat NA MinimalHabitat NA
HA12 Stable Stable Stable Stable/Sink
HA13 Source Source Stable Stable
AbsorokaDAU
HA19 Stable/Source Source Source/Stable Source→Stable
HA20 Source Source Source Source
WindRiverDAU
HA3 Stable/Source Stable/Source Stable Source
HA4 Stable Stable Stable Stable/Sink
HA18 Stable/Sink Source Stable/Sink Stable/Source
HA28 Source Source Source Source
WyomingRangeDAU
HA2 Source Source Source Source
HA14 Stable Stable Stable Stable
HA17 Stable/Source Source Stable/Source Source
HA26 Stable/Sink Stable/Sink Stable/Sink Source
HA29 Stable Source Source/Stable Source/Stable
STATEWIDE Stable Stable/Source Stable/Sink Stable*Arrowsindicatedatatrendingtowardobjectives.**HuntArea32didnotexistpriortoHY2012,andonlyincludesoneyearofdata.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
20
DISCUSSION–SUCCESSFULAPPLICATIONSANDCHALLENGESWITHSOURCE/STABLE/SINKMANAGEMENTSTRATEGIESWeprovidethesoutheastMLMUasanexampleofawell‐balancedmountainlionmanagementunit,locatedinsoutheasternWyoming.Figure2depictsclassificationsofhuntareastatusbasedonmonitoringcriteriathroughoutthefirsttwocyclesofthestatemanagementplan(2007−2012).IndividualhuntareastatuswithintheMLMUhavethepotentialtobeinfluencedbyalterationsinmanagementobjectives,aswellasbynaturalvariationinpopulationdynamicsorenvironmentalconditionsinfluencingtrackingconditionsthatdriveharvestsuccess.However,theoverallstatusofthisMLMUindicatedasustainableandwell‐functioningsystemwheresourceareasprovideopportunityforrecruitmentandjuveniledispersaltoadjacentareas,stablehuntareasmaintainbalancedsubpopulations,andsinkareasallowincreasedmortalitywithoutjeopardizingtheintegrityofthepopulation.
Figure2.AverageHuntAreastatusclassificationwithinthesoutheastMLMUinWyomingfromHY2007−HY2012.MonitoringcriteriaindicatethisMLMUfunctionedatastable/sourcelevel([a]human‐causedmortalitydensity=5.0/1000km2suitablewinterhabitat,[b]%adultfemaleharvest=15.5,[c]averageageofadultfemalesinharvest=5.5years)
Wealsoprovideanexampleofthebenefitsderivedfromtheabilitytoadaptmanagementstrategies.In2011,theWGFDrespondedtopublicperceptionregardingregionalmountainlionmanagementaswellaspotentialconflict,
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
21
primarilyintheformofdomesticsheepdepredationinnortheastWyoming.ThisresultedinhuntareaboundaryandmortalitylimitchangesimplementedinthenortheastpriortoHY2012todirectmountainlionharvestontoprivatelandssurroundingtheBearLodgeMountains(HuntArea32).WeusedakerneldensityestimatorasavisualaidtocompareharvestdensitiesrelativetothenortheastMLMUbeforeandaftermanagementstrategieswereimplemented.Figure3Ashowsgeneralareaswherethethehighestdensitiesofmountainlionharvesthadoccurredprevioustothehuntareaboundaryalterations(HYs2010−2011).WhencomparedtoFigure3B(HYs2012−2013),therestructureofthehuntareasresultedinashiftinharvestdensitiestowardthedesiredarea,drivenbydirectingharvesttothenewlyestablishedhuntarea32andaccompaniedbyanincreaseinoverallharvestlimitsforthenortheastMLMU.
Figure3.Spatialcomparisonofrelativeharvestdensitiesbefore(A)andafterdirectingmountainlionharvest(B)byincorporatinganewHuntArea32inHY2012withintheNortheastMLMU.
Aswithanyimplementationofwildlifemanagementstrategiesintendedto
addresscomplexecologicalprocessesandsocialcommentary,challengesandcomplicationsareinevitable.Aswelookatharvestdataacquiredovertwocompletemanagementcycles,weidentifysomeofthesechallenges,giveexamplesofwheretheyoccur,anddiscusspotentialramificationsforlimitationswithincurrentstatemonitoringcriteriaandmountainlionmanagementacrossWyoming. Interpretationofmonitoringcriteriatodeterminetrendsinhuntareastatuscanbechallenging.Lowsamplesizesinhuntareaharvestoftenresultinsporadicandhighlyvariableresults,wheretheproportionofadultfemalesharvested(criteria(b))canbeincreasinglydifficulttodetermine.Forexample,huntarea13consistentlyreportedlowoverallharvestnumbers,andthereforewasincreasingly
A B
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
22
difficulttodetermineareliabletrendintheproportionofadultfemalesharvested(Figure4).
11 1
1
1
21
1
1
1
1
2
1
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Subadult Male
Subadult Female
Adult Male
Adult Female
Figure4.Age/sexcompositionofmountainlionhuntarea13inWyomingfrom2007−2012.Boldnumbersindicatereportedsamplesizesforeachcohort.
Collectingadequateharvestdatacanbeaccomplishedeitherbyspatiallyexpandingtheareaunderanalysistoincorporatemorepotentialharvest,orbytemporallyextendingthegiventimeframetoallowmoreharvesttooccurandbeassessedundervariousmethods(e.g.,3‐yearaverage,runningaverages,smoothingmethods).Explainedwithinthemanagementplan,refrainingfrommakingmanagementchangeswithinthe3‐yearcycleprovidesvaluabletemporalbufferstoalleviatethesesamplesizeconcerns.However,furthercomplicatingsamplesizeadequacywithinthesescenariosistheapplicationofcriteria(c),wheretheaverageageofadultfemalesharvestedisfurtherusedtoassesspopulationtrend.Atahuntarealevel,withsuppressedoverallharvestalreadyinfluencingtheaccuracyoftheproportionofadultfemalestaken,thisissueisexacerbatedwhenthesamplesizeisfurtherrestrictedtotheamountofadultfemalesharvestedwithinahuntarea,andoftenresultsinasamplesizeof1or2adultfemalemountainlionsindeterminingtheaverageage(e.g.Figure4).
Tomaximizeaccuracyintrendanalyses,thecurrentmanagementplanalso
emphasizestheimportanceofusingmultiplemetricstodeterminepopulationstatus,suchasthedensityofhuman‐causedmountainlionmortality/1000km2(a).Althoughmortalitydensityistypicallyoneofthestrongestmetricsusedtodeterminehuntareastatus,thistoohaslimitations.Human‐causedmortalitydensityiscalculatedbasedontheamountofhighqualitywinterhabitatidentifiedformountainlions,andwasderivedinpartthroughresourceselectionmodelsdevelopedinselectareasinWyomingandextrapolatedviapredictivemapsacrossthestate.Theseempiricallytestedmortalitydensitiesandassociatedhabitatmodels
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
23
areessentiallythefoundationforthisportionofthestatemanagementplanmonitoringcriteriainWyoming.Anassumptionnecessaryfortheapplicationofstatewidesuitablehabitatmodelincludethatmountainlionshaveindeedcolonizedallareaswherehabitathasbeenidentified,whichisgenerallysupported.However,withvariabilityinkeyhabitatcharacteristics(e.g.largeorsmallconnectedareasofsuitablehabitat,variouspreydensities,etc.)acrossthestate,weunderstandthatmountainliondensitiesareunlikelytobeuniformacrossthelandscape.Specifichuntareaswherelittletonosuitablehabitatisapparentrendersmortalitydensitiesinapplicabletoevaluate.Andwhilethemanagementplansupportstheabilitytorestructurehuntareaboundariesasnecessary,huntareasaremoreoftensplittocreatenewareasthanmergedtogether.Whilethesechangesareoftenimplementedtotargetharvesttospecificareas,theseactionsoftentiebacktotheimportanceofconservationofspatialareathatsupportthesamplesizesnecessaryforpreviouslymentionedmetricsofhuntareatrends.Althoughsamplesizeadequacywasgivenmuchconsiderationduringthedevelopmentofthestatemanagementplan,itnever‐the‐lesspersistsasaprimarychallengewhenanalysingmountainlionmortalitydata.
Anotherchallengethatmeritsdiscussionistheverbiageofobjectiveswithin
themountainlionmanagementplan.Theveryterm“objective”ironicallymaybesubjectiveundervariouscircumstances,aswellasatvariousscales.Atpopulationlevels(MLMUorstatewide),thegeneralmissionofmountainlionmanagementinWyomingisapparent:tosustainmountainlionpopulationsincorehabitatatvaryingdensitiesdependingonmanagementobjectives(WGFD2006).However,huntarealevel“objectives”forstable/source/sinkarelessclear.In2010,mountainlionregulationnomenclaturewaschangedfromtheuseof“harvestquotas”totheterm“mortalitylimits.”Thiswasdonetosupporttheconceptthatgiventheself‐regulatingtendencyofmountainlionpopulations,thelevelofallowablemortalityaremeanttoprovidelimitsthatmaybereachedthroughhuntingopportunity,butarenotnecessarilyafailureifnotmetorexceeded.Soalthoughsource/stable/sinkmaybeusedtoclassifyanobjectiveforeachhuntarea,itisthecombinedresultthatprovidessustainabilityinmountainlionpopulations.However,specifichuntareaswithinthestatedosetobjectiveslikenedtoaspecificmanagementgoal(e.g.,toreducelocalmountainliondensities).Althoughwecannotforcehunterstoincreaseharvestofmountainlionswithinhuntareaswhereharvestlimitsarenotreached,thestatedoesattempttoincreaseharvestlevelsbyprovidingadditionalandreducedpricelicensesinsomehuntareas,orbyalteringhuntareaboundariestofurtherdirectharvest.Thisseemscontradictorytothepreviousargument,andrendersobjectivesdifficulttointerpretdependingondesiredoutcomes.Forexample,whenquantifyinghuntareaobjectivesbasedonmortalitylimits,thestatehasshownanincreaseintheproportionofhuntareasthatwouldclassifyasasinkifallmortalitylimitswerereached.Whileaportionofthesehuntareamortalitylimitsaresetwiththeintentiontoreducelocalpopulationdensities,othersaresetsimplytomaximizehunteropportunity.Regardlessofintent,theflexibilityinthemanagementstrategydesignedtoregulatemortalitylimitstomeetobjectivesofsource,stable,orsinkhuntareasthereforehavethepotentialtobecomeskewed.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
24
Managingmultipleadjacenthuntareasatrelativelyhighmortalitydensitiescancauseareductiontheproportionofresidentmountainlions,whichmaycomplicateinterpretationofmonitoringcriteriausedtoassesspopulationtrends.Forexample,HuntArea1locatedintheBlackHillsisoneoffourhuntareasundermanagementforlocalreductionsintheresidentmountainlionpopulationwithinthenortheastMLMU.From2007−2009,thishuntareaexhibitedhigherproportionsoffemalesharvestedinresponsetoincreasedmortalitylimits.However,recentdata(HY2010−HY2012)haveshiftedthismetrictoarelativelylowproportion,duetoassumedsuppressioninoverallabundanceofmatureindividualsunderincreasingmortalitydensities(Figure5).Underconsistentlyhighmortalitydensities,theelevatedproportionofadultfemalesharvestedcannotbesustainedforprolongedperiods,andscenariossuchastheseconveytheimportanceofassessingharvestdatathroughtimetoidentifytrendsinthedata,aswellgatheringaspectrumofdatatobestdeterminethestatusofthepopulation.Inthissituation,thechallengethereinliesnotsolelyinthemanagementplanitself,butintheadherencetomaintainabalanceofsource/stable/sinkthroughmortalitylimitssetwithineachMLMU.
Figure5.HuntArea1trendinmortalitydensity(blackline)andage/sexcompositionofharvestedmountainlionsfrom2007−2012.Mortalitydensityvaluesfrom5−8generallyindicatestabilityinthepopulation.Notetheinverserelationshipbetweentheproportionofadultfemalesharvested(red)andmortalitydensitytrend.
Inconclusion,Wyoming’smountainlionmanagementplanhasthusfarprovidedaneffectiveframeworktoaccomplishthestatewideobjectivetoprovideviableandsustainablemountainlionpopulationsatvaryingdensitieswithinsuitablehabitat.Wyominghasreportedrecordharvestlevelsoverthepastseveralyears,butmonitoringcriteriadataindicatestabilizationintheassumedincreaseinmountainliondistributionandabundanceoverthepastfewdecades(Jenks2011).
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Mor
talit
y/10
00km
2 h
abit
at
Subadult Male
Subadult Female
Adult Male
Adult Female
Mortality Density
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
25
Theflexibilityoftheplanhasprovidedtheabilitytobeproactiveinthepreventionofmountainliondepredationevents,toaddresspublicsafetyconcerns,andworkinconcertwithmanagementstrategiesaimedtosupportotherwildlifespeciesthroughoutthestate.LITERATURE CITED ANDERSON, C.R., JR., AND F.G. LINDZEY. 2005. Experimental evaluation of population
trend and harvest composition in a Wyoming cougar population. Wildlife Society Bulletin 33:179-188.
JENKS, J.A., editor. 2011. Managing cougars in North America. Jack H. Berryman
Institute, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.
THOMPSON, D. J., AND LARGE CARNIVORE SECTION. 2013. Wyoming mountain lion harvest/mortality report: Harvest years 2010-2012 (1 September 2010 – 15 April 2012). Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Lander, Wyoming, USA.
THOMPSON, D. J., AND TROPHY GAME MANAGEMENT/RESEARCH BRANCH. 2010.
Wyoming mountain lion harvest/mortality report: Harvest years 2007-2009 (1 September 2007 – 23 April 2010). Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Lander, Wyoming, USA.
WYOMING GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT. 2006. Mountain Lion Management Plan. Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Cheyenne, Wyoming, USA.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
26
RecentManagementApproachesforCougarinIdaho
JimHayden,IdahoDepartmentofFishandGame,2885WestKathleenAvenue,Coeurd’Alene,Idaho83815,USA,jim.hayden@idfg.idaho.gov
Abstract:IdahocurrentlyoperatesunderaCougarManagementPlandraftedduring2002andoriginallyslatedtobere‐writtenby2011.CougarhuntingseasonsaresetonaGameManagementUnit(GMU)scale,butanalysisofharvestdataoccursacross18DataAnalysisUnitscomprisedof2to14GMUs.Seasonsaresetannually.Atthestartoftheplanningperiod,harvestin35GMUswasmanagedusingafemalequota.Oftheremaining64GMUswithoutaquota,9weremanagedundera2cougarbaglimit.Currently,managementof35GMUsremainsunderafemalequota,and13oftheremainingunitsaremanagedundera2cougarbaglimit.PredationmanagementplanshavebeenapprovedfortwoareasofIdaho(theLolo/SelwayandtheMiddleForkSalmonRiver)toaddresssubstantialdeclinesintheseelkherds.However,nocontrolactionshavebeenincludedtodateforcougarwithintheseareas.WhiletherearenofirmplansforaCougarManagementPlanre‐write,thisneedisbeingdiscussed.FloridaPantherStatusReportMarcCriffield,DavidOnorato,DarrellLand,MarkA.Lotz,andMarkCunningham;
marc.criffield@myfwc.comAbstract:Floridapanthers(Pumaconcolorcoryi)arefederallyclassifiedasendangeredbytheEndangeredSpeciesActandprotectedinFlorida.Assuch,panthersaremanagedundertheFloridaPantherRecoveryPlanwiththeoverallgoalofachievinglong‐termviabilityanddelisting.TheFloridaFishandWildlifeConservationCommission(FWC)initiatedresearchonFloridapanthersin1981.Overthelast33years,withassistancefromourFederalpartners,wehaveradiocollared229panthers,andhandled405neonatekittensatdens.TheFWCcontinuestoassessprogresstowardspantherrecoveryvialong‐termmonitoring,researchinitiativesaimedatassessingpopulationparameters,andworkingtoresolvehuman‐pantherconflictscoincidingwithagrowingpantherpopulationinshrinkinghabitat.TheFWCandourpartnersarecurrentlyfocusedonseveralresearchstudiesincluding:1)assessingmultipletechniquestoderiveastatisticallydefensiblepantherpopulationestimate;2)continuedassessmentoftheimpactsofgeneticrestoration;and3)monitoringthepotentialimpactsofwildlifediseasesonpantherrecovery.TheFWCandtheUniversityofFloridaarecollaboratingonresearchaimedatgarneringabetterunderstandingofhumandimensionissuesassociatedwithanexpandingpantherpopulation.TheseincludeanassessmentofthecausesofcalfmortalityonranchingoperationsinSouthwesternFloridaanddeterminingeconomicallyfeasiblemethodsofprovidingincentiveprogramstoprivatelandownerstoconserveandmanagetheirlandinwaysthatbenefitboth
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
27
traditionallandusesandhabitatforpanthers.Floridapantherrecoveryreliesonlong‐termmonitoringdatatoguidepubliclandhabitatmanagement,minimizelossofhabitatfromnewdevelopmentsandtosupportcooperativeprogramswithprivatelandownerstohelpconserveremainingpantherhabitatinFlorida.NevadaCougarManagementTopicsCarlW.Lackey,NevadaDepartmentofWildlife,1100ValleyRoad,Reno,NV89423,
USA,clackey@ndow.org
Abstract:Nevada’sMountainLionManagementPlanwaslastupdatedin1995.Sincethattimetherehavebeenseveralregulatorychangestocougarmanagementinthestate,mostofwhichwereimplementedwiththegoalofincreasingannualharvest.Thiswastheproductofapoliticallychargedsystemunderwhichcougarmanagementinthestatewasoperating.Theserevisionsincludedreducedtagcosts,over‐the‐countertagsales,increasedbaglimitsandchangestoayear‐aroundseason.Thesechangeshavehadonlymoderateeffectsontotalharvest.Currentharvestlevelsrepresentroughly11%oftheadultcougarpopulationandarebelowthe5‐yearand10‐yearharvestaverages.Statewidecougarharvestprobablyhasbeenmoredependentonyearlyclimaticfluctuationsthanithasontheimposedregulatorychangesmentioned.CougarresearchcontinuesinwesternNevadawithacontributiontothejournalMolecularEcology(2012)byAlysonAndreasen,UniversityofNevada,Reno.AdditionalpublicationsfromthatPhDdissertationareforthcoming.Wecontinuetoinvestigateresearchopportunitiesandareanticipatingthatacougarandblackbearinteractionstudywillbegininfallof2014.WashingtonMountainLionStatusReport–2014RichardA.Beausoleil,WashingtonDepartmentofFishandWildlife;
richard.beausoleil@dfw.wa.govAbstract:Thisstatusreportwillbeanupdateofcougarresearch,management,andlegislativeactivitiesinWashingtonsincethe2011mountainlionworkshop.After13yearsofcontinuousresearchon6studyareasinWashington,manycougarresearchprojectshavebeencompletedinvolvingpersonnelfromWDFW,WashingtonStateUniversity,andUniversityofWashington.Muchofthisresearchhasbeenpublishedsincethelastworkshopandseveralmoremanuscriptsareinproductionandpress;thosewillbehighlightedinthispresentation.Activityduringthelast3legislativesessionssincetheMontanaworkshopwillalsobesummarized;theyincludeSubstituteSenateBill1885regardingfeedingofwildlifeandfinesandSenateBills5356and6287concerningtheuseofdogstohuntcougar.Finally,in
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
28
2012‐13,WDFWadoptedanewharvestguidelinestructureincorporatingthesocialstructureofcougarsintomanagement.Thestatewasdividedinto49populationmanagementunits(PMUs)anda12‐16%harvestguidelinewasappliedtoeach.Thisprocess,aswellasresultsfromthepast2years,willbediscussed.EventsinCalifornia’sMountainLionManagement,2011‐2014MarcW.Kenyon,CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife,1701NimbusRd,Suite
D.,RanchoCordova,CA95670,USA,Marc.Kenyon@wildlife.govAbstract:Mountainlionsaredesignatedasa“speciallyprotectedmammal”forwhichhuntingisprohibitedandnofundsareallocatedformonitoring,researchordepredationandpublicsafetyresponse.Asaresult,California’smountainlionmanagementhasbeenguidedbystatelawthatislimitedtorespondingtohuman‐mountainlionconflicts,andconflictsassociatedwithsensitivebighornsheeppopulations.Althoughrespondingtomountainlionconflictsrepresentsanunfundedmandate,thepublicexpectsawell‐coordinatedresponsetosuchcallsforservicewhereindividualsperceiveathreattopublicsafety.However,duetorecentreductionsinforce,highpersonnelturnover,andreductionsinresourcesavailabletorespondingpersonnel,thisexpectationhasnotbeenconsistentlymetthroughoutthestate.Toamelioratethissituation,CDFWbeganrevisingthestate’smountainlionpolicy.Thiswaspromptedbyaseriesofunfortunatecircumstancesincludinganincidentthatresultedinthedeathof2juvenilemountainlionsinthecityofHalfMoonBay.Thisincident,coupledwithahistoryofsimilarsituations,resultedinlegislativechangesrequiringCDFWtoconsiderutilizingtheexpertiseofnon‐agencypersonnel(localveterinarians,universityresearchers,wildliferehabilitators,andNGO’s)andrecommendedtheuseofnon‐lethalmeasuresasaninitialsteptoresolvinghuman‐mountainlionconflicts.Theselegislativerequirementswereincorporatedintothenewpolicy,whichhasbeenineffectsinceJanuary,2013,andwearedevelopingcoordinated‘regionalresponseteams’toassistoureffortswhennecessary.CDFWhasrecentlyallocatedfundingtobegindevelopingastatewideconservationmanagementprogram.Thisprogramwillbehighlycollaborativeandinvolvediversestakeholderstohelpdefineconservation,managementandresearchprioritiesthroughoutthestate.Thiseffortwillalsoevaluateusinghabitatsuitabilitymodelsandresourceselectionfunctionscoupledwithpopulationgeneticstodevelopregionalizedpopulationmonitoringprioritiesforassessingthestate’smountainlionpopulation.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
29
AlbertaCougarManagementJayHoneyman,AlbertaEnvironmentandSustainableResourceDevelopmentAbstract:CougarpopulationsinAlbertahadundergonesignificantdeclineandrangecontractionasaresultofpreydeclineanddirectpersecutionoverthelastcentury.Morerecently,fromthetimetheywerefirstdeclaredabiggamespeciesin1971,cougarpopulationshaveincreasedinnumbersandexpandedindistribution.Cougarmanagementhasbeenadjustedthroughthe1900’sand2000’storeflectthegrowingpopulation,withnewhuntingareasandseasonsaddedascougarscontinuetoexpandtheirrange.In2014,cougarmanagementinAlbertareflectsaneedtobalancecougarconservationwithstrongpublicsentimentthatopposesthepresenceofcougarsinruralresidentialandagriculturallandscapes.ToreadAlberta’scougarmanagementplangoto:http://esrd.alberta.ca/fish‐wildlife/wildlife‐management/documents/WildlifeMgmtPlan‐Cougars‐Nov2012B.pdfNebraskaMountainLionStatusReportSamWilson,NebraskaGameandParksCommission;sam.wilson@nebraska.govAbstract:MountainlionswereextirpatedfromNebraskabytheearly1900sduetounregulatedhunting,trapping,poisoninganddecimationofpreyspecies.In1991afemalewaslegallyshotinthePineRidgeregionofnorthwesternNebraskamarkingthefirstdocumentedpresenceinmoderntimes.Afemalemountainlionwithkittenswasdocumentedinthisregionin2007,whichprovidedthefirstevidenceofaresidentpopulationsinceextirpation.RecentevidenceofreproductionandresidentanimalssuggestsmountainlionsarealsorecolonizingtheWildcatHillsinthesouthernpanhandleandtheNiobraraRivervalleyinnorth‐centralNebraska.TheCommissioninitiatedgeneticsurveysutilizingscatdetectordogsin2010toestimatethesizeofthemountainlionpopulationinthePineRidge.TheamountofsuitablehabitatwasalsoestimatedusingGISbasedhabitatmodeling.Thegeneticsurveywasrepeatedduring2012.Nebraska’sinauguralmountainlionharvestseasonopenedonJan1,2014.Thestateisdividedintofourunits:1)thePineRidgeunit–whichencompassesthelargestknownpopulation,2and3)theUpperPlatteandKeyaPahaunits–whichencompassthetwonewlydocumentedpopulations,and4)thePrairieunit–whichconsistsof87%ofthestatewherenopopulationshavebeendocumentedandhabitatmaybelimited.HuntinginthePineRidgeunitresultedinaharvestoftwomalesandonefemale.ThePrairieunitremainsopenyear‐roundandthereisnoharvestlimit.Noharvestisallowedduring2014intheUpperPlatteandKeyaPahaunits.Additionalresearchisplannedfor2014and2015inordertocreatepopulationestimatesforthePineRidgeandtherecentlyrecolonizedareas.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
30
NewMexicoCougarManagementUpdate2014EliseJ.Goldstein,NewMexicoDepartmentofGameandFish,1WildlifeWay,Santa
Fe,NM87507;elise.goldstein@state.nm.usFredericWinslow,NewMexicoDepartmentofGameandFish,1WildlifeWay,Santa
Fe,NM87507Abstract:Cougars(Pumaconcolor)becameaprotectedspeciesinNewMexicoin1971,andhuntingmanagementwasbasedonazonemanagementsystemstartingin2000.Habitatmodellingestimatesacougarpopulationof3,100to4,300individuals.Thereare19managementzones,11aremanagedforincreasingpopulations,and8aremanagedforstabletodecreasingpopulations.Forincreasingpopulations,totalharvestcannotexceed25%ofthepopulation,withfemaleharvestnottoexceed30%ofthetotalharvest.Forstabletodecreasingpopulation,totalharvestcannotexceed30%ofthepopulation,withfemaleharvestnottoexceed50%ofthetotalharvest.Currently,onlysportharvestcountstowardsthemaximumsustainableharvestlimit.From2010‐2013,40%oftotalharvestwasfemales,≥50%offemalesharvestedwere<2.5yearsold,andtheaverageannualtotalharvestwas215animals.Annually,4‐7%ofthecougarpopulationiskilledfromallsourcesofhuman‐causedmortality.
Desertbighornsheep(Oviscanadensis)werelistedasastateendangeredspeciesin1980,andinthe1990sitwasdocumentedthat85%ofknowncausemoralitywascausedbycougarpredation.From1979to2001,249bighornweretransplantedintothewild,andfrom2002‐2013231bighornweretransplantedintothewild.In2001,acougarremovaleffortwasimplementedindesertbighornhabitatinNewMexico;theareaconstitutes~1%ofcougarhabitat,andanaverageof2.6cougarspermountainrangeperyearisremovedunderthisprogram.Cougarpredationmortalityratesfordesertbighorndeclinedfrom0.16priortocougarremovalto0.06followingcougarremoval.Allothercausesofmortalityremainedfairlyconstantat0.05priortocougarremovaland0.06followingcougarremoval.Thisdemonstratesthatcougarpredationisanadditivesourceofmortalityfordesertbighorn.Desertbighornincreasedfrom<170animalsin2001toapproximately800in2013.Whenhighcougarpredationratesarelimitingbighornpopulations,acougarremovalprogrammayallowbighornpopulationstoexpand.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
31
ACausetoPauseinMontana,Again–What’s‐upwithMontanaMountainLions?2011‐2014JimWilliams,MontanaFish,WildlifeandParks;USA,jiwilliams@mt.govAbstract:Montanaisintheprocessofdedicatingresourcestocreateanewstatewidemountainlionmanagementplan.Wearecurrentlyoperatingunderaplanthatwaswrittenin1996.TheJournal;ofWildlifeManagementhastentativelyacceptedanewmonographtitled“LinkingResourceSelectionandMortalityModelingforPopulationEstimationofMountainLionsinMontana”.ThisstatewideresearcheffortwillhelprefineharvestMontanamanagementgoals.Morespecifically,intheBitterrootValleyofwestcentralMontana,mountainliondensityestimatesarebeingproducedbycurrentresearcheffortsthatchallengetraditionaldensityparadigms.Lastly,ecologicaldiscussionsfromthelastWAFWAworkshopwereincorporatedintosomeregionalMontanamountainlionhuntingseasonstructures.ArizonaGameandFishReportAprilHoward,ArizonaGameandFishDepartmentAbstract:Researchhasshownthatpredationbymountainlionscanlimitbighornsheeppopulationsandimpederestorationeffortsorinducepopulationdecline.AftermountainlionscolonizedsouthwesternArizonaintheearly2000’s,bighornsheeppopulationsinthatareadeclinedby50%.In2013,atranslocationof31bighornsheepintosoutheasternArizona,whichoncecontainedarobustandindigenouspopulationofdesertbighornsheep,werequicklyreducedto14within4months.Afteranalysesoftheprobablecausesofthesheepdeclineinbothareas,predationbymountainlionswasidentifiedasonefactorthatcouldpotentiallybelimitingtherecoveryofthebighornsheeppopulations.ArizonaimplementedAdaptiveMountainLionPredationManagementPlansforeachsite.AnimportantcomponentofeachPlanistouseresearchandmonitoringapproachestoincreaseknowledgeandtoevaluatemanagementactionsacrossabroaderareaoftheselowerdeserthabitats.Althoughitisprematuretoformanyconclusions,currentinformationcollectedfromcollaredsheepandmountainlions,andsurveydataareusedtoimplementandevaluatemanagementstrategiessuchas“offending“lionremoval,multiplebaglimits,andmountainlionmanagementzones.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
32
EvolutionofmountainlionmanagementinNorthDakota,2011‐2014StephanieTucker,NorthDakotaGameandFishDepartment,Bismarck;
satucker@nd.govAbstract:ManagementofmountainlionsinNorthDakotafocusedonhumanconflictsandharvestmanagementduringthepast3years.Alsoduringthistime,thefirstactiveresearchprojectonmountainlionsinNorthDakotabegan.Thisfirstphaseofresearchconcentratedonadultmountainlionsurvivalandfoodhabitsasascientificcomparisontolandownerandhunterconcerns.Landownertoleranceformountainlionsremainslow.Additionally,mountainlionscontinuetobeascapegoatforlowmuledeernumbers.Anupcomingsecondphaseofresearchwillattempttoverifyourpopulationandhabitatmodels,sothatarealisticlevelofcertaintycanbeachievedtoaidinharvestmanagement.ThesmallpopulationsizeofmountainlionsinNorthDakotaaddschallengestothespecies’management.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
33
PlenarySession2:KeynoteAbigcatinasmallbody:DoEurasianlynxhavewhatittakestosurvivetheAnthropocene?Dr.JohnLinnell,NorwegianInstituteforNatureResearch,Trondheim,NorwayAbstract: Thereiscurrentlyahugefocusontheglobalstatusoflargecarnivores,withsomespeciessuchastigers,snowleopards,cheetahandAfricanlionsattractingmostattention.Althoughthereisnodoubtthatthesespeciesareinneedofallthehelptheycanget,thedominanceofthesespeciesinthepublic’seyedetractsfromthemorecomplexsituationsfacingotherspecies.Theseincludespecieslikemountainlions,leopardsandEurasianlynx.Thesespeciesarewidespreadandhavehighlyvariablestatus.Populationsvaryfromlarge,wellconnectedandexpanding,tosmall,isolatedandhighlyendangered.ThistalkfocusesontheEurasianlynx,exploringwhatweknow,anddon’tknow,aboutitsecologyandconservationstatusacrossitswidedistributionthatstretchesacrossEurasia.Thetalkwilladdressdetailsofitsecologyandmanagement,especiallyfocusingonissueswithparallelstomountainlions–includingcompetitionwithhuntersforwildungulates,depredationonlivestock,monitoringandhunterharvest.ThetalkwillsummarizewhatisknownfromthemanystudysitesinEuropewhereithasbeenwellstudied–butwillalsoprofilejusthowmuchisunknownaboutitsstatusandecologyacrossthemajorityofitsrangeinAsia.
JohnLinnelldiscusseslynxecology.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
34
Session3:
FelidEcology,Conservation,andPopulations,
Part1
AshwinNaidutalksaboutbarriersandgeneflow.
Proceedingsofthe
11thMountainLionWorkshopIntegratingScientificFindingsintoManagement
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
35
PotentialbarriersrestrictinggeneflowamongmountainlionsinArizona.AshwinNaidu,SchoolofNaturalResourcesandtheEnvironment,Universityof
Arizona;ashwin@email.arizona.eduRobertR.Fitak,InstitutfürPopulationsgenetik,VeterinärmedizinischeUniversität
Wien,Vienna,Austria,rfitak9@gmail.comMelanieCulver,GraduateInterdisciplinaryPrograminGeneticsandSchoolof
NaturalResourcesandtheEnvironment,UniversityofArizona;mculver@email.arizona.edu.
Abstract:Weinvestigatedthepopulationgeneticstructureofmountainlions(Pumaconcolor)inArizonafromhunter‐harvestedtissueandscatsamplescollectedduring2008‐2012.Ourgoalwastoexaminewhatgeographicfeatures(e.g.interstatehighways,theColoradoRiver,theGrandCanyon)arepotentiallyrestrictinggeneflowamongmountainlionsinthestate.Wegenotyped466DNAsamplesfor10well‐knownFeliscatusmicrosatelliteDNAmarkers,andwith“PumaPlex”–apanelof26singlenucleotidepolymorphisms(SNPs)recentlydevelopedforpopulationgeneticstudiesonmountainlions.Wefoundthehigheststatisticalsupportforfoursub‐populationsofmountainlionsinArizona.Geographicvisualizationofthesesub‐populationssuggestedthatInterstatehighways(particularlyInterstate‐10westofPhoenix,Interstate‐17andInterstate‐40)andthelowerColoradoRivermightberestrictinggeneflowamongmountainlions.Tocorroborategeneticdataonmountainlionpopulationsubstructureandconnectivity,wearecurrentlycreatingaGIS‐basedhabitatsuitabilitymodelformountainlionsthatwillprovideuswiththepotentialcorridorsformountainlionmovementacrossthesebarriers.Datageneratedfromthisstudywillbeusefulforwildlifemanagers,stakeholders,andconservationplannersinmakingregionalorstatewidemanagementdecisionsformountainlions,designatingwildlifecorridorareas,andfacilitatingcollaborativeresearchbetweenindividuals,laboratoriesandagencies.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
36
Theimportanceofscaleandbehavioralstateinpumaresourceselectionfunctions.KathyA.Zeller,DepartmentofEnvironmentalConservation,Universityof
Massachusetts,Amherst;kathyzeller@gmail.com
KevinMcGarigal,DepartmentofEnvironmentalConservation,UniversityofMassachusetts;mcgarigalk@eco.umass.edu
PaulBeier,SchoolofForestry,NorthernArizonaUniversity,Flagstaff;paul.beier@nau.edu
SamuelCushman,U.S.ForestServiceRockyMountainResearchStation,Flagstaff;scushman@fs.fed.us
T.WinstonVickers,WildlifeHealthCenter,SchoolofVeterinaryMedicine,UniversityofCaliforniaDavis;winstonvickers@charter.net
WalterM.Boyce,WildlifeHealthCenter,SchoolofVeterinaryMedicine,UniversityofCaliforniaDavis;wmboyce@ucdavis.edu
Abstract:Pumahabitatrelationshipsaretypicallyestimatedwithresourceselectionfunctions(RSFs),whicharebasedonapaired‘used’/’available’design.ManypumaRSFsusetheareaofthehomerange,orlarger,fortheavailableextent.Additionally,mostRSFsusealldatapointsforanalysis,regardlessofthebehavioralstateofanindividual.Wewereinterestedinexaminingselectionatfinerscalesandfordifferentbehavioralstates.GPStelemetrydatacollectedat5‐minutefixintervalsfrompumasinsouthernCaliforniawereusedinapairedused/availabledesigntoexplorethesensitivityofRSFstotheextent,orscale,ofavailablehabitatandtothebehavioralstateofindividuals.Weexamined37scalesofavailablehabitat,from250mto10,000m,andtwobehavioralstates,resourceuseandmovement.Acrossthefullfactorialofscalesandbehavioralstates,wecomparedparameterestimatestodeterminethestrengthofselection,andmodelperformancetoassesspredictiveability.RSFsweresensitivetothescaleofavailablehabitat.Multiplecharacteristicscaleswerefoundacrossourpredictorvariables,indicatingthatpumasinthestudyareaarerespondingatdifferentscalestodifferentlandscapefeaturesandthatmulti‐scalemodelsmaybemoreappropriate.Acrossbehavioralstates,pumasrespondtograsslands,coastaloakwoodlandsandcoastalscrubatfinescales,andurbanandagricultureatcoarsescales.RSFswerealsosensitivetobehavioralstate;specifically,pumasengagedinresourceusebehaviorhadanoppositeselectionresponsetosomelandcovertypesthanpumasengagedinmovementbehavior.Allmodelsperformedwell,withcoarserscaleandmulti‐scalemodelsoutperformingfine‐scalemodelsandresourceusemodelsgenerallyoutperformingmovementmodels.OurresultsindicatethatmultiplescalesofselectionandbehavioralstatesshouldbeexaminedinpumaRSFs,especiallywhenresultswillbeusedformanagementpurposes.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
37
California’scougarconnectivity:geneticsinformingconservationandmanagementHollyB.Ernest.WildlifeHealthCenterandVeterinaryGeneticsLaboratory,School
ofVeterinaryMedicine,UniversityofCalifornia,Davis;hbernest@ucdavis.edu
T.WinstonVickers.WildlifeHealthCenter,SchoolofVeterinaryMedicine,UniversityofCalifornia,Davis;winstonvickers@charter.net
WalterM.Boyce.WildlifeHealthCenter,SchoolofVeterinaryMedicine,UniversityofCalifornia,Davis
SethP.D.Riley.NationalParkService‐SantaMonicaMountainsNationalRecreationArea,ThousandOaks,CA
ChristopherC.Wilmers.EnvironmentalStudiesDivision,UCSantaCruzAbstract:Mountainlions(Pumaconcolor)inCalifornialiveamongsthabitatmosaicsspanningarangebetweenextremesofurbanizedfragmentedcoastalenvironmentsandvastmontanewildlandsinthenorthstateandinland.CoastregionsextendingbetweenSanFrancisco,LosAngeles,andSanDiegohaveburgeoninghumanpopulationswhiletheNorthCoastRange,SierraNevada,andModocPlateauencompassvastsectionsofintactpumahabitatlessimpactedbyhumandevelopments.InordertoassesspopulationconnectivityandgenetichealthofCaliforniamountainlionsacrosstheseextremes,weconductedadetailedappraisalofthegeneticdiversity,relatedness,andpopulationstructureofCaliforniapumapopulationsusing354samplesanda46‐locusmicrosatelliteDNApanel.Thisstudyfollowsuponworkconductedtenyearsagoandemploysanexpandedgenetictoolsetandlargercoastregionsamplesize.Weevaluatedandcomparedlevelsofgeneticdiversity,inbreeding,relatedness,effectivepopulationsizes,andtestedwhethergeneticdatasupportedhypothesesofrecentbottlenecksinkeypopulationsincludingtheSantaCruzMountains(n=78),SantaMonicaMountains(n=26),SantaAnaMountains(n=42)andadjacentPeninsularRanges(N=55).WefoundthatcoastpopulationsnearlargeurbancentershadmuchlowergeneticdiversitythaninlandpopulationssuchasthoseinSierraNevada.Specificinstancesofrepeatedinbreedingandsignsofpotentialgeneticdefectsweredetected.ThesefindingsraisemajorconcernsaboutthecurrentstatusofCaliforniacoastalmountainlionpopulations,andthelonger‐termoutlookforpumasinsouthernandcentralcoastalCalifornia.Inparticular,thefindinghighlighttheurgencytomaintain–andenhance–whatconnectivityremainsforpumas(andpresumablynumerousotherspecies)acrosshumanbarriersincludingmultilanehighwaysanddevelopments.Wearehopefulthatthesenewgeneticresults,coupledwiththedemographicfindings,willmotivategreaterconservationfocusandeffectiveoutcomes.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
38
Populationgeneticsofasmall,isolatedpopulationofmountainlions:Barriers,inbreeding,andgeneticrescue.SethP.D.Riley,SantaMonicaMountainsNationalRecreationArea,NationalPark
Service,401W.HillcrestDr.,ThousandOaks,CA91360,USA,seth_riley@nps.gov
JohnPollinger,DepartmentofEcologyandEvolutionaryBiology,621CharlesE.YoungDriveSouth,UniversityofCalifornia,LosAngeles,CA90095‐1606,USA,jpolling@ucla.edu.
LaurelSerieys,DepartmentofEcologyandEvolutionaryBiology,HersheyHallBox957246,UniversityofCalifornia,LosAngeles,CA90095‐7246,USA,laurelserieys@gmail.com.
JeffreyA.Sikich,SantaMonicaMountainsNationalRecreationArea,NationalParkService,401W.HillcrestDr.,ThousandOaks,CA91360,USA,jeff_sikich@nps.gov.
LisaDalbeck,WildlifeGenetics,GenomicsandPopulationHealth,SchoolofVeterinaryMedicine,OneShieldsAvenue,UniversityofCalifornia,Davis,CA,95616,USA,ldalbeck@ucdavis.edu.
RobertK.Wayne,DepartmentofEcologyandEvolutionaryBiology,621CharlesE.YoungDriveSouth,UniversityofCalifornia,LosAngeles,CA90095‐1606,USA,rkwayne@ucla.edu.
HollyB.Ernest,WildlifeGenetics,GenomicsandPopulationHealth,SchoolofVeterinaryMedicine,OneShieldsAvenue,UniversityofCalifornia,Davis,CA,95616,USA,hbernest@ucdavis.edu.
Abstract:Mountainlionspersistnaturallyatlowdensitiesandcanbeparticularlysensitivetotheeffectsofhabitatlossandfragmentation,includinggeneticeffectssuchasinbreedingandthelossofgeneticdiversity.TheSantaMonicaMountains,northwestofLosAngelesarea,arecompletelyisolatedfromotherlargenaturalareasbyurbandevelopmentandlargefreeways,specificallythe101Freewaytothenorth.LocationsofGPSradio‐collaredmountainlionsindicatethatthesefreewaysareasignificantbarriertomountainlionmovement.Toevaluatetheeffectsofthesebarriersinmoredetail,wegenotyped26lionscapturedaspartofalong‐termNationalParkServicestudy,aswellas16otherlionsintheareaat54microsatelliteloci.MountainlionsintheSantaMonicaMountainshadsignificantlylowergeneticdiversitythanthosenorthofthefreewayasmeasuredbyexpectedheterozygosityandnumbersofalleles.Morebroadly,thissmallpopulationalsoexhibitedthelowestlevelsofgeneticdiversitythathavebeenreportedbothinCaliforniaandthroughoutthewest.Basedonpedigreeconstructionandgene‐dropanalysis,individualmalemountainlionscanhaveveryhighreproductivesuccessanddominatethegenepoolofthispopulation.Becauseofourdetailedknowledgeofthissmallpopulation,wewereabletodocumentthatindividualeventssignificantlyaffecteditspopulationgenetics.Specifically,ayoungmale(P12)immigratedintothepopulationfromnorthofthe101Freeway,Hepossessed20allelesthatwerenot
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
39
previouslypresentintheSantaMonicaMountainspopulation,19ofwhichhepassedontohisoffspring,increasingthepopulation‐leveldiversity.However,wealsodocumentedmultipleinstancesofclose‐inbreeding,specificallybetweenfathersanddaughters,somethingthathasrarelybeenreportedinthisspeciesandwhichhadmeasurablynegativeeffectsongeneticdiversity.Currently,connectivitybetweentheSantaMonicaMountainsandothernaturalareastotheNorthisverylimited;maintainingandenhancingconnectivitywillbecriticalforthelong‐termdemographicandgenetichealthofmountainlionpopulationsinthisandotherfragmentedlandscapes.
SethRileydiscussesmountainlionpopulationgenetics.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
40
Session4:
FelidEcology,Conservation,andPopulations,
Part2
Proceedingsofthe
11thMountainLionWorkshopIntegratingScientificFindingsintoManagement
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
41
Homerangecharacteristicsofasubordinatepredator:selectionforrefugiaorpreyavailability?PatrickE.Lendrum,Panthera,NewYork;plendrum@panthera.org
L.MarkElbroch,Panthera;melbroch@panthera.org
HowardQuigley,Panthera;hquigley@panthera.org
DanielJ.Thompson,WyomingDepartmentofGameandFish;daniel.thompson@wyo.gov
MichaelJimenez,UnitedStatesFishandWildlifeService,Jackson,Wyoming;mike_jimenez@fws.gov
DerekCraighead,CraigheadBeringiaSouth;derek@craighead.us
Abstract:Cougars(Pumaconcolor)aredescribedas“habitatgeneralists”,butlittleisknownaboutwhichecologicalfactorsdrivetheirhomerangeselection,particularlyinthepresenceofdominantcompetitors(i.e.wolves,Canislupus).WetrackedcougarsusingVHF(2001to2005)andGPS(2006to2011)technologyintheSouthernYellowstoneEcosystem(SYE)innorthwesternWyoming,USA.Wetestedwhetherdatatype(VHFvs.GPS),cougarsex,accesstoforests(refugia),orpreyavailabilityexplainedthesizeof50%and95%kerneldensityestimator(KDE)homeranges.Second,wequantifiedattributesofcougarhomerangesandtestedwhethertheyweredifferentfromattributesoftheoverallstudyarea,toaddresstheecologicalquestion:Docougarsselecthomerangesbasedontheavailabilityofrefugia,preyavailability,orsomecombinationofthetwo?Cougarsexanddatatypeprovedsignificantpredictorsofhomerangesizeforboth95%and50%KDEs,andtheamountofforestpartlyexplainedthesizeof50%KDEs.CougarhomerangesderivedfromVHFdatawere1.4‐1.9timeslargerthanhomerangesderivedfromGPSdata,however,homerangeattributesdeterminedfromVHFandGPSdatawereremarkablyequivalent.Femalecougarsselectedhomerangeswithhigherhuntopportunitythanmales,andhigherthanexpectedwhencomparedtothemeanvalueofthestudyarea,supportingthelong‐standingassumptionthatfemalesprimarilyselecthomerangeswithsuitablepreytosustainthemselvesandtheirdependentyoung.Allcougarsselectedhomerangesfurtherfromknownwolfpacks,providingevidencefornewlyestablishedcompetitionbetweenresidentcougarsandrecolonizingwolves,butdidnotselecthomerangeswithgreateraccesstolandscaperefugia.OurresultsprovidedevidencethatcougarsintheSYEselecthomerangesthatprovidehighpreyavailabilityandaspatialbufferthatmitigatespotentialconflictswithadominantcompetitor.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
42
GeneticstructureofcougarsintheBlackHills,SouthDakota.RebecaL.Juarez,DepartmentofNaturalResourceManagement,SouthDakotaState
University;rebeca.juarez@sdstate.edu
JonathanA.Jenks,DepartmentofNaturalResourceManagement,SouthDakotaStateUniversity
MichaelK.Schwartz,USDAForestService,RockyMountainResearchStationKristyP.Pilgrim,USDAForestService,RockyMountainResearchStation,MissoulaDanielJ.Thompson,WyomingGameandFishDepartment
Abstract:Assessinggeneticstructureofgamespeciespopulations,suchascougars(Pumaconcolor),providesknowledgeofpopulationdemographicsandisvitalforlong‐termmanagement.Havingre‐populatedtheBlackHillsby1998,thecougarpopulationreachedsaturationin2005,promptinganinitiationofaharvestseasonbySouthDakotaDepartmentofGame,FishandParks.IncreasingharvestquotasinconjunctionwiththerelativeisolationoftheBlackHillsmaydeterconnectivityandacttodecreaselong‐termviability.OurobjectivesweretoassessgeneticstructureofcougarsintheBlackHills,SouthDakota,measureeffectivepopulationsize(Ne),andcompareresultswiththosefoundbeforeaharvestseasonhadbeenimplementedusing20microsatelliteloci.WealsocomparedgeneticstructureandconductedpopulationassignmenttestswiththeneighboringcougarpopulationsinWyomingandNorthDakota.Weconductedgeneticanalysison712DNAsamplesfromcougarsintheBlackHillscollectedfrom2003‐2013.Capturedanimalswerefittedwithradio‐collarsandeartagged.Blood/tissuesampleswerecollectedfromallradio‐collaredandharvestedindividuals,aswellasnon‐harvestrelatedmortalities.GeneticanalysiswasmeasuredusingGenAlEx,HP‐Rare,ONeSAMP,andSTRUCTURE.Pre‐harvestgeneticanalysisfoundanexpectedheterozygosity(HE)of0.55,observedheterozygosity(HO)of0.55,andeffectivepopulationsizeof27.9(23‐39;95%CL).Incomparison,wedeterminedthatcougarsinSouthDakotapostinitiationofharvesthadanaverageexpectedheterozygosity(HE)of0.56,andanaverageobservedheterozygosity(HO)of0.55.EffectivepopulationsizeofcougarsintheBlackHills,SouthDakotawas28.4individuals(23‐37;95%CL).WewereabletosuccessfullyassigncougarsfromSouthDakota,NorthDakota,andWyomingintoseparatepopulations.GeneticvariabilityofcougarsintheBlackHillsremainsstable,possiblyasaresultofemigrationandimmigration.ContinuedgeneticassessmentofcougarsinSouthDakotaisrecommended.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
43
IntegratingResourceSelectionandHarvestintoSpatialCapture‐RecaptureModelsforestimatingmountainlionabundance.KellyM.Proffitt,MontanaFish,WildlifeandParks;kproffitt@mt.gov
MarkHebblewhite,UniversityofMontana,WildlifeBiologyProgram,Missoula;mark.hebblewhite@umontana.edu.
JoshuaGoldberg,UniversityofMontana,CollegeofForestryandConservation,Missoula;Joshua.f.goldberg@gmail.com.
MikeThompson,MontanaFish,WildlifeandParks;mthompson@mt.gov.
BenJimenez,MontanaFish,WildlifeandParks;bjimenez@mt.gov.
RobinRussell,USGS,NationalWildlifeHealthCenterMadison;rerussell@usgs.gov.
Abstract:ThelackofrigorousmountainlionabundanceestimateshascontributedtomakingmountainlionmanagementoneofthemostcontentiouswildlifeissuesinwesternMontana.Recentadvancesinspatialcapturerecapture(SCR)modelshaveprovidednewapproachesforaddressingthisimportantneedandprovidinganobjectivebasisformountainlionmanagement.WedevelopedextensionstostandardSCRmodelstoincorporatesimultaneouslivesamplingandharvesteventsandhabitatqualityinformation.WedemonstratetheuseofthesenovelmethodsinestimatingmountainlionabundanceanddensityintwomountainlionmanagementunitsinwesternMontana,huntingdistricts250and270.WeidentifiedindividualsthroughDNAsamplescollectedby1)biopsydartingtreedmountainlionslocatedduringsystematicsurveys,2)opportunisticallycollectinghairandscatsamples,and3)samplingallharvestedmountainlions.Weincluded80DNAsamplescollectedfrom62independentindividualsintheanalysis.Weestimatedtheabundanceof85(95%CI=54,141)independentmountainlionsinhuntingdistrict250and82(95%CI=51,137)inhuntingdistrict270.Theseresultsare2‐3timeshigherthanpreviouslyestimatedminimummountainlionabundancesinthisarea,andcorrespondtodensityestimatesof4.6and5.4lionsper100km2.BecausecurrentharvestregulationsinwesternMontanaweredevelopedundertheassumptionoflowerpopulationabundance,lionmanagementobjectivesareunlikelytobemetunlessharvestprescriptionsareadjustedtoaccountforthisnewunderstandingoflionpopulationstatus.Morebroadly,theanalyticimprovementsinSCRmethodswillenhancetheabilityofwildlifemanagerstoreliablyandeconomicallyestimateabundanceofmountainlions,aswellasotherlargecarnivores.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
44
EvaluationofharvestindicescurrentlyusedforcougarmanagementinUtah:Oquirrh‐StansburyandMonroeunitsascasestudies.MichaelL.Wolfe,DepartmentofWildlandResources,UtahStateUniversity,Logan;
michael.wolfe@usu.edu
EricM.Gese,U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture,WildlifeServices,Logan;eric.gese@usu.edu
PatTerletzky,DepartmentofWildlandResources,UtahStateUniversity,Logan;pat.terletzky@usu.edu
DavidC.Stoner,DepartmentofWildlandResources,UtahStateUniversity,Logan;david.stoner@usu.edu
LiseM.Aubry,DepartmentofWildlandResourcesandtheEcologyCenter,UtahStateUniversity;lise.aubry@usu.edu
Abstract:WepresentdemographicestimatesfromtwocougarpopulationsinUtahthathavebeenintensivelymonitoredfor17years,andcomparethesedemographicratestoharveststatisticsprovidedbytheUtahDivisionofWildlifeResources(UDWR)coveringthelengthofthestudyperiod.WequantifytherelationshipbetweenharvestindicesandestimateddemographicratesfortheMonroeandtheOquirrh‐Stansburymanagementunits,respectively.ThefirstisahuntedpopulationintheMonroeMountains,aremotelocationinsouth‐centralUtah;andthesecondisasemi‐protectedpopulationintheOquirrhMountains,ontheperipheryofSaltLakeCity.OuroverallobjectivewastoassesstherelationshipsbetweentheharvestindicescurrentlyusedforcougarmanagementinboththeOquirrh‐StansburyandMonroewildlifemanagementunitsandprovidetheUDWRwithrecommendationstohelpcalibratecurrentlyusedindicestoactualpopulationdynamics.BecausetheOquirrh‐Stansbury(i.e.,whereanthropogenicsourcesofmortality,otherthanharvest,arepredominant)andMonroemanagementunits(i.e.,whereharvestisthemaincauseofmortality)aresubjectedtocontrastingmortalityregimes,resultsprovidedbythisstudycouldbeexpandedtoothermanagementunitsthatexhibitsimilarcharacteristicstotheunitsdescribedhere.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
45
SurvivalratesofcougarsinOregonfrom1989–2011:aretrospectiveanalysisDarrenA.Clark,OregonCooperativeFishandWildlifeResearchUnit,Corvallis;
darren.a.clark@state.or.us
BruceK.Johnson,OregonDepartmentofFishandWildlife;bruce.k.johnson@state.or.us.
DeWaineH.Jackson,OregonDepartmentofFishandWildlife;dewaine.h.jackson@state.or.us.
MarkHenjum,OregonDepartmentofFishandWildlife
ScottL.Findholt,OregonDepartmentofFishandWildlife;scott.l.findholt@state.or.us.
JamesJ.Akenson,OregonDepartmentofFishandWildlife
RobertG.Anthony,OregonCooperativeFishandWildlifeResearchUnit,Corvallis
Abstract:Weconductedaretrospectiveanalysisofsurvivalandcausesofmortalityof222radiocollaredcougars(Pumaconcolor)in3lightlyhuntedcougarpopulationsinOregonfrom1989–2011.Twostudies[CatherineCreek(1989–1996)andJacksonCreek(1993–2002)]overlappedthepassageofMeasure18in1994,whichprohibitedtheuseofdogstohuntcougars,buttheWenaha‐SledSprings‐Mt.Emily(WSM)didnot(2002–2011).HuntingmortalitywasthemostcommoncauseofdeathatCatherineCreekandWSM.Incontrast,naturalmortalitywasmostcommonatJacksonCreek.AnnualsurvivalratesofadultmaleswerelowestatCatherineCreekpre‐Measure18(0.57)andincreasedpost‐Measure18(0.86),similartothoseratesobservedatJacksonCreek(0.78)andWSM(0.82).Sub‐adultmalesurvivalincreasedpre‐Measure18(0.57)topost‐Measure18(0.86)atCatherineCreek,whichwasgreaterthansurvivalratesobservedatJacksonCreek(0.60)andWSM(0.45).Regardlessofhuntingregulations,annualsurvivalratesofadultandsub‐adultfemalesweresimilaramongstudyareas(0.85–0.89).WeobservedaneffectageonannualsurvivalatbothJacksonCreekandWSM,whereyoung(1–3years)maleshadlowersurvivalthanyoungfemales,butsurvivalofmalesandfemalesweresimilarbyage4or5years.Survivalofbothgendersdeclinedatolderages(6+years)atWSMbutnotJacksonCreek.WedidnotobserveaneffectofageonsurvivalatCatherineCreek.Ourresultsindicatedsourcesofmortalityvariedwithinjurisdictions,evenifmanagementpracticesweresimilar.Huntingcougarswithdogsloweredofadultmalescomparedtoareaswherecougarsarehuntedwithoutdogs.Theeffectofincreasingageoncougarsurvivalshouldbeconsideredwhenusingsurvivalratestoestimatepopulationgrowthrates.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
46
UsingDNAtoevaluatefieldidentificationofcougargenderbyagencystaffandhuntersusingtraineddogs
RichardA.Beausoleil,WashingtonDepartmentofFishandWildlife,3515State Highway97A,Wenatchee,WA,richard.beausoleil@dfw.wa.gov
Abstract:Cougarhuntinghastypicallybeenclassifiedaseitherselective‐huntingwiththeaidofdogsornon‐selective‐huntingwithoutdogs,basedontheassumptionthathuntersusingdogscanbetteridentifygenderofcougarspriortoharvest.Subsequenttohuntactivity,94%ofallwildlifeagenciesthatallowcougarhuntinghavemandatoryinspectionswheregenderisidentifiedandrecordedbyagencystaff.TotesttheabilityofhuntersandagencystaffinWashingtontocorrectlyidentifygenderofcougarsinthefieldduringhuntingseasonsandinspectionofmortalities,respectively,thisprojectusedDNAanalysisoftissuesamplescollectedwithbiopsydartsandduringinspection.ThegenderassignedbydoghuntersinthefieldmatchedgenderfromDNAanalysis70%ofthetime(n=159);correctidentificationvariedbetween57and88%peryear.ThegenderidentifiedbyagencystaffduringinspectionofmortalitiesmatchedDNAanalysis85%ofthetime(n=1,331);correctidentificationvariedbetween71and90%peryear.Becausegendermisclassificationhasthepotentialtoalterintendedhunterharvestaswellashowsuccessofmanagementprescriptionsareinterpreted,agenciesmaywanttoinitiateinternalandhuntereducationprograms.Sincethemajorityalreadyhavemandatoryinspections,agenciesmayalsowanttoconsiderDNAcollectionduringmandatoryinspectionstoidentifyerrorratesofgenderidentificationbystaffwithintheirjurisdiction.Finally,consideringthesizeofcougarmanagementunitsinjurisdictionscanbeavaluablewayforagenciestopreventcomplicationsofpotentialgendermisidentification.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
47
Session5:
Posters
Proceedingsofthe
11thMountainLionWorkshopIntegratingScientificFindingsintoManagement
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
48
OrphanedkittensinWashingtonresultinadecadeofnationwidecougareducation
RichardA.Beausoleil,WashingtonDepartmentofFishandWildlife,richard.beausoleil@dfw.wa.gov
Abstract:Between2002and2012,26orphancougar(Pumaconcolor)cubshavebeenreportedtoWashingtonDepartmentofFishandWildlife(WDFW),capturedbystaff,andplacedwithfacilitiesaccreditedbytheAssociationofZoosandAquariums(AZA)throughouttheU.S.Inadditiontoover15millionvisitorsperyearatthesefacilities,innumerabletelevisionandnewsprintstorieshavecoveredthecapture,transport,andarrivaloftheseanimals,thusreachingouttocountlessmillionsmorepeople.Thishasnotonlyresultedinhighqualitycougareducationprogramsbenefitingpeoplewhomayneverhavethechancetoseeacougarinthewild,butalsobroughtprominentnationalattentiontoWDFW.Theprocessofresponding,capturing,andprovidingcareuntilarrangementsarefinalized,andtransportinganimalsrequiresorganization,commitment,andonoccasionpersonaldonationsoftimeandmoney.Inalmostallcases,orphanedcougarkittensarereportedtoWDFWbyamemberofthepublicconcernedthattheanimalswillnotsurviveontheirown.Manytimes,thereportsaregivenwithoutthereportingpartyknowingthespecifics;onlythatthekittenshavebeenseenwithoutanadult.Ifit’sthefirstsighting,andwedonothavebackgroundknowledge,weaskthattheyleavetheanimalsaloneandkeepusinformeddaily;thisavoidsremovingkittensthatarenotorphanedandlefttemporarilywhiletheadultfemaleishuntingforfood.Asadditionalinformationisobtained,andwearecertaintheadultisnolongerpresent,aresponseisinitiated.Inadditiontousingseveraltypesofboxtraps,kittenshavebeencapturedusingWDFW’sKarelianBearDogs(treeingkittens),andbyhandonseveraloccasions.Oncecaptured,allkittensaretestedforFeLV/FIV,transportedtoaveterinarianandgivenathoroughexamination,careisadministeredifneeded,andbiologicalmeasurementsaregatheredandrecorded.Healthcertificatesandimportpermitsarethenobtainedtofacilitatetransfer.Manytimes,kittensneedtotravelbyaircrafttotheirfinaldestination.Regulationsrequireanabsorbentmaterialbeusedasabaselayerinthetransportcrate,windowsanddoorsaresecurelycoveredwithbreathableburlap,doorsaresecurelylocked,andfoodandwaterisprovided.Flightsarealmostalwaysdirecttothedestinationtolimittimeinthecrate.Asmuchaspossible,wekeepthereportingpartyinvolvedthroughouttheprocess;thishadresultedinrespect,credibility,andmuchappreciation.WeacknowledgetheassistanceofMichelleSchireman,NorthAmericaSectionAZAFelidTAGPumaPopulationManager&RegionalStudbookKeeper,whohasbeenaninvaluablecollaboratorinplacingtheseanimals,andtheAZAorganizationsthroughouttheU.S.thathaveprovidedaplacefortheseanimalstobecomeambassadorsforthespecies.Pleasecomebyandseethisdescriptiveposterandlearnmoreaboutthisprocessduringthepostersession.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
49
ForagingpatternsofcougarsinthePryorMountainsofWyomingandMontana
LinseyW.Blake,DepartmentofWildlandResources,UtahStateUniversity,Logan;linsey.blake@aggiemail.usu.edu
EricM.Gese,U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture,WildlifeServices,Logan;eric.gese@usu.edu
Abstract:Theimpactofcougarpredationontheirpreyspeciesvariesregionally.Todocumenttherelationshipsbetweencougarpredationandthebighornsheep,muledeer,andferalhorsepopulationsoftheBighornNationalRecreationAreaandthePryorMountains,wedeployedGPScollarson6cougarsandvisitedtheirlocationclusterstodeterminetheirkillratesandforagingpatterns.Weexaminedthepreycompositionoftheirkills(n=200)byspecies,muledeersexandageclasses,preysizeclasses,aswellasthesexorsocialclassofthecougar.Weexaminedselectionrelativetoungulatepopulationcompositionobtainedthroughanaerialsurvey.WefoundmuledeerweretheprimarypreyofcougarsinthePryorMountains,whilebighornsheepandferalhorsesconstitutedsecondarypreyspecies.Whilecougarsselectedforbighornsheep,thiswasallattributabletooneindividualthatspecializedonbighornsheep.Thiscougarpopulationalsoselectedforadultmaleandjuvenilemuledeer.Femalecougarskilledmoredoesandmaleskilledmorebucks.Familygroupshadtheshortesttimeintervalsbetweenkills,whileadultmaleshadthelongest.Werecommendthatmanagerscontinuetoinvestigateoptionstoreducepredationpressuresfromcougarsonthebighornsheeppopulation.Modificationofpredationriskthroughhabitatmanipulationcouldbeconsidered.Managersshouldbeawarethatsmall,isolatedbighornsheeppopulationscanbedifficultandexpensivetomaintain.Inaddition,atthetimeofthisstudy,thecougarpopulationwasnotdepredatinganyferalhorses;thusmanagerswillneedtocontinueactionstoreachtheirmanagementobjectivesofreducingtheferalhorsepopulation.ImprovementsonGPSlocationclusteranalysistechniquesforpredictingfeedingactivities
KevinA.Blecha,GraduateDegreePrograminEcology,ColoradoStateUniversity,FortCollins;Kevin.blecha@gmail.com
MatW.Alldredge,ColoradoParksandWildlife,FortCollins;Mat.Alldredge@state.co.us
Abstract:GPSlocationclusteranalysishasbecomeastapletechniqueinlargepredatorfeedingstudies.Wedemonstratethreeimprovementstothemethodbasedonstudydesignandtechnologicaladvancementsinafouryearstudyof4600clusterground‐truthingvisitstoGPSlocationclustersfrom53cougarsubjects:1)
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
50
Ground‐truthingpotentialfeedingsiteshavegenerallyreliedoneitherexhaustivelyvisitingallclustersofanindividualsubjectorbyopportunisticnon‐randomsampling.Theformermaybecostprohibitiveandlimitthesamplesizeofanimalsubjects,whilethelattermayleadtobiasedestimatesofkill‐rate/preycomposition.Wedemonstrateastratifiedrandomsamplingschemeformonthlyvisitationperiods,alongwithasampleof“singlepointclusters”consistingofasingleGPSlocation.2)Feedingeventpredictionmodelsusingclassicclusteranalysesarelikelybiasedtowardlargerpreyitems.Wedemonstrateasimpleintegrationofaccelerometersensordataasanadditionalcovariatetohelpimprovepredictionmodels.3)Itissuspectedthattheprobabilityatechniciansuccessfullyclassifiesaclusterwhileground‐truthingdeclinesasthevisitationlag(timedelaybetweentechnicianvisitationandcougarfeedingdate)increases.Directsatellitecommunicationcapabilitiesnowallowreal‐timedownloadingofGPSdata,andthusnearreal‐timeground‐truthing.Wetestedthisonasampleofclusters(n=202)withvisitationbyonetechnician1‐3dayspostinitiationbythecougar,andthenbyasecondindependentblindobserver1‐60dayslater.Thedoubleobserversconcurredinthepresence/absenceoffeedingremainsin98.6%ofthecases,whileconcurringonspeciesidentificationin93.6%.Whileclassificationsuccessofpreyspecies,sex,andagewilllikelydecreaseaspreyremainsdegrade,researchersshouldbeconfidentthatthepresence/absenceclassificationcomponentisrobustforthelogisticallyfeasiblevisitationlagsthatweretested.Trichinellaintwodisjunctpopulationsofpuma
MarcCriffield,FloridaFishandWildlifeConservationCommission,Naples;marc.criffield@myfwc.com
JenniferE.Thomas,OklahomaStateUniversity;jennifer.e.thomas@okstate.edu
KenLogan,ColoradoDivisionofWildlife;ken.logan@state.co.us
MarkCunningham,FloridaFishandWildlifeConservationCommission;mark.cunningham@myfwc.com
DaveOnorato,FloridaFishandWildlifeConservationCommission;dave.onorato@myfwc.com
EdoardoPozio,IstitutoSuperiorediSanità,Rome,Italy;edoardo.pozio@iss.it
MasonV.Reichard,OklahomaStateUniversity;mason.reichard@okstate.eduAbstract:Trichinellaspp.arezoonoticnematodescommonincarnivoresthroughouttheworld.Theseparasitesareuniquebecausethesameindividualishosttoallstagesofthenematodeandtransmissionisbasedoningestionofinfectedtissues.WedeterminedtheprevalenceofTrichinellaspp.infectionsinFloridapanthers(Pumaconcolorcoryi)andcougar(P.concolorcouguar)fromColorado.Tonguesamplesfrom114pantherand40cougarmortalitieswerecollectedatnecropsyandexaminedbyartificialdigestion.Trichinellaspp.larvaeweredetected
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
51
in24(21.1%)panthersand18(45.0%)cougars.OftheseTrichinellasamples,19fromFloridaand9fromColoradoweregenotypedtospecies.FromFlorida,T.pseudospiraliswasdetectedin16,T.spiralisin1,and2pantherswereinfectedwithbothT.pseudospiralisandT.spiralis.FromColorado,T.murrelliwasdetectedin5,T.pseudospiralisin3,and1cougarwasinfectedwithTrichinellagenotypeT6.OurresultsindicatedthatinfectionofTrichinellaiscommonthroughoutdifferentpopulationsofpumasintheU.S.ThisisthefirstreportofTrichinellapseudospiralisinpanthersandcougarsandonlythethirdreportinU.S.wildlife.InfectionofTrichinellaspp.inpumaisusuallysubclinicalandrarelycausesdisease.However,understandingtheepidemiologyofTrichinellaspp.inpumabecomesincreasinglyimportantsinceFloridapanthersareendangeredandcougarsharvestedinColoradoareoftenconsumedbyhumans.ConfirmedmountainlionsinOklahoma
AaronGhaemi,OklahomaDepartmentofWildlifeConservation;aghaemi@cableone.net
Abstract:TheMountainlion(Pumaconcolor)historicallyroamedmuchoftheUnitedStatespriortoearlysettlement.EarliestreportsofmountainlionsinOklahomadatebacktothemid1800’s.Since2002,fourteenmountainlionshavebeenconfirmedinOklahomabytheDepartmentofWildlifeConservation.Confirmationconsistsofphotos,tracks,scat,orotherphysicalevidence.Whenpossible,sexofthelionswasdetermined.Sevenmalesandfourfemaleswereclassified.Threelionswereunclassified.Necropsieswereperformedon3lioncarcassesandallfemalesexaminedtodatehaveshownnoevidenceofreproduction.AsmountainlionpopulationsinthewesternU.S.continuetoexpand,dispersalislikelytocontinueintoOklahoma,bringingtransientlionsseekingnew,uninhabitedterritoriestoestablishhomeranges.Pumaactivityandmesocarnivores
AlexViere,FurmanUniversity,DepartmentofBiology,Greenville;aviere23@gmail.com
TravisW.Perry,FurmanUniversity;Travis.Perry@Furman.eduAbstract:Apexpredatorsmayexerttopdowneffectsonecologicalcommunitiesdirectlybyaffectingtheabundanceanddistributionofherbivoresthroughpredationandpredatoravoidance,orindirectlybyaffectingherbivoresthroughsimilareffectsonmesocarnivores.Ourobjectivewastodeterminewhethertherewasasignificantnegativeassociationbetweenpuma(Pumaconcolor)activityandtheactivityofmesocarnivorescoyote(Canislatrans),bobcat(Lynxrufus),andgrayfox(Urocyoncinereoargenteus)activityasmeasuredbyphotographicrateson
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
52
remotecameras.Weusedphotographicdatacollectedfrom18May2008to1June2012from25remotecamerasdistributedatfixedlocationsover100km2insouth‐centralNewMexico.Weloggedatotalof25,475cameranightsandcollected538photosofpuma,892ofcoyote,278ofbobcat,and2,945ofgrayfox.Negativebinomialregressionsrevealedasignificantnegativeassociationbetweenpumaactivityandcoyoteactivity(z=‐14.423;df=25;p<0.0001)andpumaandbobcatactivity(z=‐2.417;df=25;p=0.008).Wealsofoundanegativeassociationbetweenpumaandgrayfoxbutthisrelationshipwasnotstatisticallysignificant(z=‐0.932,df=25,p=0.176).Ourdatasupportthehypothesisthatpumareducethepresencesmallercarnivores.Ifpumadodisplacemesocarnivorestothedegreewehaveobserved,pumamayexertadditionaleffectsonecosystemprocessesquiteapartfromthelargeherbivoremediatedprocesseswithwhichwearemorefamiliar.However,wecannotruleoutthepossibilitythatdifferencesinfinescalehabitatpreferencesamongthesespeciesareresponsibleforthepatternsweobservedinthisstudy.Rigorouscomparisonsbetweenareaswithandwithoutpuma,orbeforeandafterpumaareremoved/added,couldaddressthisambiguity.Effectsofpumasex,season,andhabitattypeondiet
SadiePerrin,FurmanUniversity,DepartmentofBiology,Greenville;sadieperrin@gmail.com
TravisW.Perry,FurmanUniversity;Travis.Perry@Furman.edu
Abstract:Ourobjectivewastodeterminewhetherpumasexesrespondeddifferentlytoseasonandhabitattypewithrespecttodiet.FromFebruary26,2008toJune6,2012,weinvestigated392preycaches,representingthedietsof15adultpumatotalacrosstwostudyareasinsouth‐centralNewMexico.Weusedlog‐linearanalysesandpost‐hocChi‐SquaretestsofIndependencetoelucidatetheinteractiveeffectsofseason(cold‐dryversushot‐wet),habitattype(riparianfloodplainonBosquedelApacheNationalWildlifeRefuge(BDA)versuscanyon‐landfoothillsontheLadderRanch(LR)),andpumasexondiet.Wefoundamarginallysignificantsexxhabitattypexpreysizeeffect(G=‐7.661;df=3;p=0.053).BothmaleandfemalepumaatemoresmallandmediumsizedpreyitemsontheBDA.Thispatternwasstatisticallysignificantforfemales(G=58.7;df=2;p<0.001)butnotformales.OntheBDAwefoundamarginallysignificantsexxseasonxpreysizeeffect(G=‐7.1008;df=3;p=0.069).Heremalesandfemalesconsumedmoremediumandsmallpreyinthewarm‐wetseason.Thispatternwasmuchmorepronouncedformales(G=6.875;df=3;p=0.076).OntheLRwefoundasignificantsexxseasonxpreysizeeffect(G=‐11.023;df=3;p=0.012).Femalestendedtoconsumemorelargeandmediumpreyinthewarm‐wetseasonwhereasmalesconsumedmoremediumandsmallpreyduringthistime.Thiswastrendwasstatisticallysignificantformales(G=16.099;df=3;p=0.001)butnotforfemales.Ingeneral,malepumadietdemonstratedmoredramatictemporalchangesthanspatialchanges.OnboththeBDAandLRmalepumadietshiftscorrespondedtotheungulatebirthpulse.While
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
53
femalepumaalsorespondedtotheungulatebirthpulseonbothstudyareas,femalepumaexploitedtheincreasedavailabilityofsmallpreyspeciesinthefloodplaintoagreaterextentthanmales.Effectsofambientlightonpuma,deer,andelkactivity
ScarletSellers,FurmanUniversity,DepartmentofBiology,Greenville,SC;ssellers91@gmail.com
TravisW.Perry,FurmanUniversity,DepartmentofBiology;Travis.Perry@Furman.edu
Abstract:Puma(Pumaconcolor)dependonconcealmenttopreyprimarilyonungulates.Weaskedwhetherpumaactivity,asmeasuredbyremotecameras,andpredation,asmeasuredbyindividualpredationevents,wasaffectedbyambientlightandparticularlybylunarphase.Wealsoaskedifactivityofmuledeer(Odocoileushemionus)andelk(Cervuselaphus),weresimilarlyaffected.Toexaminetheeffectsoflunarilluminationonpumapredationwecomparedthemeanfractionofthemoonilluminatedbetweennightswhenkillsweremadeandnightswhenkillswerenotmadeusingat‐test.ToexamineactivitypatternsacrossilluminationperiodsweconductedtwosetsofChi‐squaredtestsofindependence.First,wecomparedphotocountsacrossilluminationperiodsofdawn,sunlight,dusk,dark,andmoonlightfortwostudyareas,theBosquedelApacheNationalWildlifeRefuge(BDA)andtheLadderRanch(LR)whichdifferedinhabitattypeandhumanactivity.TheBDAislocatedinriparianfloodplainandexperienceshighhumanvisitation.TheLRisincanyonlandfoothillsandhumanvisitationisrare.Second,werepeatedtheseanalysesacrossthelunarphasesofdark,1stquarter,2ndquarter,3rdquarter,and4thquarter.Usingdatafrom35camerasoperatedforvaryingperiodsfrom18May2008to1July,2012,werecorded791pumaphotos,2,922muledeerphotos,and1,201elkphotos.Pumawereprimarilynocturnal;deerandelkwereprimarilydiurnal.However,allthreespeciesweremoreactiveatnightontheBDAandmoreactiveduringdaylightontheLR(pumaX2=9.0173;df=4;p=0.061;deerX2=213.6;df=4;p<0.001;elkX2=90.75;df=4;p<0.001).Pumaactivitywasnotassociatedwithlunarphase.Deerandelkweresignificantlymoreactiveinmoonlight(X2=24.24;df=4;p<0.05andX2=21.14;df=4;p<0.05).Lunarilluminationwasnotgreateronnightswhenpumamadekills.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
54
Cameratrappingvsradio‐telemetry:acomparisonofnoninvasiveandinvasivemethodsformonitoringcougarpopulations
PeterAlexander,CraigheadBeringiaSouth,andDepartmentofWildlandResources,UtahStateUniversity;peter.d.alexander@gmail.com
EricM.Gese,U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture,WildlifeServices
HowardQuigley,Panthera
DanThompson,WyomingGameandFishDepartment
MarkElbroch,Panthera
Abstract:Conventionalmethodsformonitoringcougarpopulationsinvolvecaptureandradio‐collaring,followedbyintensiveradio‐trackingand,essentially,simpleenumerationofindividualcougars.Thismethodisassumedtobeaccurate,butprohibitivelyexpensiveandlogisticallychallenging.Noninvasivesurveytechniquesmayofferopportunitiestoaccuratelymonitorcougarpopulationtrendsatlowercoststhanconventionalcaptureandradio‐collarresearch.However,fewofthesesurveytechniqueshavebeenemployedinconjunctionwithconventionalcougarmonitoringmethodsinordertovalidatethenoninvasivepopulationestimatesagainstthosederivedfromradio‐telemetry.Along‐termcougarecologystudycurrentlybeingconductedintheJacksonHoleregionofNorthwestWyoming(theTetonCougarProject(TCP))offersanopportunitytotestnoninvasivemonitoringtechniquesonapopulationofcougarswithanestimatedknowndensity.Wesetupanarrayof43remotecamerastationsacrosstheTCPstudyareafromJunetoSeptemberin2012and2013.Thearraycomprisedof6x6kmcells,coveringatotalof1,548km2.Camerastationsweresetupusinganon‐rewardbloodluretoincreasedetectionprobabilityandtoincreaseprobabilityofidentificationthroughrepeatedphotographsperdetection.Werecorded17and16cougarphoto‐eventsin2012and2013,respectively.Weidentifiedindividualcougarsbasedonsize,morphology,andnaturalmarkings.Weproducedestimatesofabundanceusingcapture‐mark‐recaptureanalysis.Preliminaryanalysisindicatesthatthetelemetry‐derivedpopulationestimatesfallwithintheconfidenceestimatesproducedbythecamerasurvey.However,lownumbersofuniqueindividualsdetectedandpotentialviolationsofmark‐recaptureassumptionspresentissuesthatstillneedresolving.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
55
P22:WillthismountainlionmakeitinHollywood?
JeffA.Sikich,SantaMonicaMountainsNationalRecreationArea;jeff_sikich@nps.gov
SethP.D.Riley,SantaMonicaMountainsNationalRecreationArea;seth_riley@nps.gov
Abstract:Understandingthemovementsandecologyofmountainlions(Pumaconcolor)iscriticalfortheeffectiveconservationofthiswide‐rangingandlow‐densityspecies,especiallyinurbanfragmentedlandscapes.InFebruary2012amountainlionwasdiscoveredbyremotecamerasinGriffithPark,anisolated20km²patchofhabitatnexttodowntownLosAngelesthatiscompletelysurroundedbyfreewaysanddevelopment.InMarch2012,theNationalParkServicecapturedandGPSradio‐collaredayoungmale(P22),whowecontinuetofollowaspartofourlongtermstudyofmountainlionecology,behavior,andconservationinSantaMonicaMountainsNationalRecreationArea(SMMNRA)andthesurroundingregion.GenetictestingindicatesthatP22iscloselyrelatedtomountainlionsintheSantaMonicaMountainstothewest,inwhichcasehewouldhavehadtocrosstwomajorfreeways(405and101)toarriveinGriffithPark.WereportonP22’smovementpatterns,diet,andlocationswithinGriffithPark’snaturalareasandthesurroundingurbancommunities.GriffithParkreceives10millionvisitorsyearly,andyetP22remainselusiveandisrarelyseenbypeople.P22hasalsobecomeanambassadorforwildlifeandcorridorneedsintheLosAngelesarea,ashisstoryhasbeenwellcoveredinmediaoutlets.Wehavedocumentedmanyanthropogenicthreatstomountainlionsoverthecourseofourresearch,includinganticoagulantrodenticideexposure,roadmortality,andpotentiallyincreasedintraspecificconflict.ContinuedtrackingofP22willprovideimportantinsightsonmountainlionsurvivalandmovementinanisolatedandurbanlandscape,includingwhetherandwherehemovesoutofGriffithPark.Followingmountainlions,includingP22,inthefragmentedhabitatssurroundingSMMNRAwillallowustoidentifyhabitatlinkagesandcorridorscriticaltothesurvivalofmountainlionsandotherlargemammals.Inaddition,wehopetodeterminehowmountainlionscanbestcoexistwithhumansinthiscomplexurban‐wildlandinterface.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
56
Compensationandadditivityincougarmortality:learningfromheavilyandlightlyharvestedpopulations
MichaelL.Wolfe,DepartmentofWildlandResources,UtahStateUniversity;michael.wolfe@usu.edu
DavidC.Stoner,DepartmentofWildlandResources,UtahStateUniversity;david.stoner@usu.edu
EricM.Gese,U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture,WildlifeServices;eric.m.gese@aphis.usda.gov
PatTerletzky,DepartmentofWildlandResources,UtahStateUniversity;pat.terletzky@usu.edu
DavidM.Choate,SchoolofLifeSciences,UniversityofNevada,LasVegas;choate.davidm@gmail.com
DavidN.Koons,DepartmentofWildlandResourcesandtheEcologyCenter,UtahStateUniversity;david.koons@usu.edu
LiseM.Aubry,DepartmentofWildlandResourcesandtheEcologyCenter,UtahStateUniversity;lise.aubry@usu.edu
Abstract:Theinteractionbetweenanthropogenicandnaturalmortalityhaslonginterestedecologistsandisofcentralimportancetospeciesconservationandmanagement.Westudiedmortalitypatternsoftwocougar(Pumaconcolor)populationsinUtah,one(Monroe)exposedtohighlevelsofhuntingmortalityandthesecond(Oquirrhs)wassubjectedtomoderatelevelsofexploitation.Weusedcompetingriskanalysistodeterminesurvivalandcause‐specificmortalityratesusinginformationon224cougarsthatwerecapturedandequippedwithradio‐collars.Duringthis17‐yearinvestigation,146animalsdiedofaknowncauseofmortality(11diedofunknowncauses),andtheremaining67individualswereright‐censoredattheendofthestudyperiod.Anthropogenicmortalitycountedfor85.8%and51.9%ofthetotaldeathsintheheavilyandlightlyexploitedpopulations,respectively.Inbothpopulations,theprimarycausesofdeathwerehuntingandpoaching,withtheexceptionoffemalesontheOquirrhmountainsthatprimarilydiedofnaturalcauses.Regressionofannualsurvivalasafunctionofallsourcesofhumanexploitationrevealedasignificantnegativerelationship,indicatingstrongadditivityofanthropogenicandnaturalmortalityintheheavilyexploitedpopulation.Exploitationinthesemi‐protectedpopulationdidnotleadtoanysignificantdeclinesinannualsurvival,suggestingsomelevelofcompensationbetweennaturalandanthropogeniccausesofmortality.Empiricalstudiesthatdirectlyaddressadditiveversuscompensatorymortalityinexploitedpopulationsoflargecarnivoresarerare.Ourresultsdemonstratetheneedfor,andpowerof,sustainedlong‐termdatacollectioninaddressingimportantquestionsconcerningtheconservationandmanagementoflong‐livedcarnivores.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
57
Therelationshipofruraldepopulationtopuma‐humanconflictintheAltiplanoregionofTarapacá,Chile
OmarOhrens,NelsonInstituteforEnvironmentalStudies,UniversityofWisconsin,Madison;ohrens@wisc.edu
AdrianTreves,NelsonInstituteforEnvironmentalStudies,UniversityofWisconsin,Madison;atreves@wisc.edu
CristianBonacic,FaunaAustralisWildlifeLaboratory,DepartmentofEcosystemandEnvironment,SchoolofAgricultureandForestry,PontifíciaUniversidadCatólicadeChile,Santiago,Chile;bona@uc.cl
Abstract:IntheAltiplanoregionofTarapacáinChile,theAymarapeoplehavereportedanincreaseofpuma‐humanconflict,mainlyincludingpredationonlivestock.Thelackofinformationaboutthestatusofthisspeciesandtheabsenceofverificationofpumaattacksonlivestockmakeitdifficulttoapplyinterventions.Moreover,themigrationofnumerousAymaratocitieshasmeantchangesintraditionalagriculturalpractices,whichmayaccountforanincreasedsenseofvulnerabilitytopumas.WeinterviewedAymaralivestockownerstounderstandhowcertainpatternsofruraldepopulation(olderpeople,smallerhouseholdsizes,lesssupervision,lowresidency)couldberelatedtotheconflictbetweenpumasandpeople.Wefoundthatolderrespondents,withsmallerhouseholdsizesandlesstimespentintheirresidence,perceivedadeclineinpumapredationevents.However,respondentswhoperceivedanincreaseinpredationeventspresentedtheoppositepatterns.Wefoundanassociationbetweentheperceivedlevelofconflictandtheuseornotofaguard.Respondentsthatperceivedahighriskofpumaattackimplementedtheuseofaguardwhentheywereabsentfromtheirresidence,indicatingcertainadaptationstotheirtraditionalpractices.Themitigationoftheconflictandthereforethefutureofpumaconservationintheregionmaydependontheimplementationofinterventionsthatinfluencepeople’sperceptions.Weproposethehighest‐priorityinterventionincludesverifyingandmeasuringlossesandfurtherhumandimensionsworktoidentifycausesofcomplaints.Subsequentinterventionstopreventlossesorpreventretaliationagainstpumascanthenbetargetedmoreprecisely.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
58
WildpumasinBritain–exploringevidenceandgaugingpeople’sattitudes
RickMinter,BigCatStudy,RoyalAgriculturalUniversity,Cirencester,UK;rickminter@easynet.co.uk
Dr.AndrewHemmings,BigCatStudy,RoyalAgriculturalUniversity,Cirencester,UK
Abstract:AcrossBritain,allegedsightingsofpumasandblackpanthershaveoccurredfromthe1970s.Insomecounties,scoresofallegedsightingsaredocumentedannuallybyvolunteergroups.Itisassumedmanyencountersarekeptsecret,withpeoplefearingridiculeorconcernedatattractingtrophyhunters.Withnoknowledgeofpumas,peoplehavedescribedtheform,colour,locomotion,calls,andinrarecasestheyoung,ofcatsresemblingPumaconcolor.Puma‐likecatsaccountforuptoathirdofthedescriptionsinthedocumentedreports,yearonyear.Melanisticleopardisthemaincandidateforplausibleblackpantherreports.Despitetheconsistencyandcontinuityofwitnessreports,primaryevidenceislessapparent,butincludesasmallnumberofcarcassremainsverifiedbyvetsanduptoahandfulofDNAresults.Thepaucityofhardevidenceshouldbejudgedagainstthelackofresourcesappliedtodate,andtheabsenceofpastsystematicwork.AnemergingstudyattheRoyalAgriculturalUniversityexplorestheevidenceforbigcatsandlinkswithcommunitiesandlandowners.Trustingrelationshipsareimportant,givenpropertyowners’reticenceindrawingattentiontobigcatslinkedwiththeirlandandbusiness.People’sattitudestowardspossiblebigcatsarealsodocumentedatthestudy’soutreachevents.Underthenewstudy,aswellasDNAtesting,earlyprogressincludesthecollectionofskeletalremainsfortoothpitanalysis.Thescaleandpatternofcarnassialimpressionsonfourspecimenstodate,fromdifferentareas,weighsinfavourofpuma/leopardsizecats.Theattitudinalresultsshowamarkedconsistencyacrossthedifferentsamples:offeredarangeofoptions,includingscepticismandintolerance,peoplemainlyexpressfascinationandconcludethat(conditional)tolerance,andproperstudy,istheresponsiblewayforwardforunderstandingpossiblebigcatsintheirlocality.Theecologyofaconflict:Eurasianlynxdepredationondomesticsheepandsemi‐domesticreindeerinNorway
JohnOdden.NorwegianInstituteforNatureResearch;john.odden@nina.no
JennyMattisson.NorwegianInstituteforNatureResearch
JohnLinnell.NorwegianInstituteforNatureResearch
Abstract:Publicattitudestowardslargecarnivoreshavechangeddramaticallyduringthelast30years,andmanylargecarnivorepopulationsarenowrecoveringandexpandingintonewareas.InNorway,theEurasianlynx(Lynxlynx)population
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
59
increasedrapidlyinthemid1990’sresultinginincreaseddepredationandconflictswithsemi‐domesticreindeer(Rangifertarandus)andsheep(Ovisaries)herders.Annually,closetotwomillionsheeparegrazinginforestandalpine‐tundrahabitatsfromJuneuntilSeptember.SheepgrazingareasarefoundthroughoutNorway,butgrazingisespeciallyintensiveinthemountainsofsouth‐westernNorway.Inaddition,indigenousSámipeoplemanage230000semi‐domesticreindeerinthecentralandnorthernpartsofNorway.Thereisalegalrequirementthatalllossestolargecarnivoresshouldbefullycompensated.Anexpostfactocompensationschemeisbasedonanestimationoflossesandispaiddirectlytotheowners.In2013,alynxpopulationofapproximately350individualswasheldresponsibleforkilling7111sheepand8054reindeer.PersonnelfromtheStateNatureInspectorate(SNO)examinealllivestockfounddead,anddocumentthecauseofdeaththroughanecropsy.However,thedetectionrateofcarnivore‐killedreindeerisverylow(9%inwinterand2%insummer)sothereisahighdegreeofuncertaintyconcerningtherealmagnitudeofdepredation.Understandingthefactorsshapingthedynamicsofcarnivore–livestockconflictsisvitaltofacilitatelargecarnivoreconservationinmulti‐uselandscapes.Inthisstudywequantifiedlynxkillratesonsheepandreindeerintwostudyareas,onenorthernarea(sheepandreindeer)andonesouthernarea(sheep).Dataondiet,killratesonsheepanddomesticreindeer,andmovementof80individuallynxwerecollectedfrom1995to2013.Inthesouthernareaweinvestigatedhowthedensityoftheirmainwildprey,roedeer(Capreoluscapreolus)modulateslynxkillratesonsheepacrossarangeofsheepandroedeerdensities.Weusedzero‐inflatednegativebinomial(ZINB)modelsincludinglynxsex,sheepdensityandanindexofroedeerdensityasexplanatoryvariablestomodelobservedkillratesonsheep,andrankedthemodelsbasedontheirAICcvalues.Themodelincludingtheeffectsoflynxsexandsheepdensityinthezero‐inflationmodelandtheeffectoflynxsexandroedeerdensityinthenegativebinomialpartreceivedmostsupport.Irrespectiveofsheepdensityandsex,wefoundthelowestsheepkillratesinareaswithhighdensitiesofroedeer.Asroedeerdensitydecreased,maleskilledsheepathigherrates,andthispatternheldforbothhighandlowsheepdensities.Similarly,femaleskilledsheepathigherratesinareaswithhighdensitiesofsheepandlowdensitiesofroedeer.However,whensheepdensitieswerelowfemalesrarelykilledsheepirrespectiveofroedeerdensity.Inthenorthernareawequantifylynxkillratesonreindeeracrossarangeofecologicalconditions.Killrateswerestronglyaffectedbysexandsocialstatus(i.e.femaleswithandwithoutkittens),aswellasseasonandreindeeravailability.Thehighestkillrateswereobservedinsummerformalelynx,andthelowestwereobservedduringwinterforsolitarylynxatlowreindeerdensity.Ourquantificationofdepredationratesonsheepandreindeercanbethefirststeptowardsestablishingfairercompensationsystemsbasedonmoreaccurateandareaspecificestimationoflosses.Thisstudydemonstrateshowwecanuseecologicaltheorytopredictwherelossesofsheepwillbegreatest,andcanbeusedtoidentifyareaswheremitigationmeasuresaremostlikelytobeneeded.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
60
Cougarresponsetodifferentlevelsofresidentialdevelopment
BenjaminT.Maletzke,WashingtonDepartmentofFishandWildlife;Benjamin.Maletzke@dfw.wa.gov
MarkE.Swanson,DepartmentofNaturalResources,WashingtonStateUniversity;markswanson@wsu.edu
RichardA.Beausoleil,WashingtonDepartmentofFishandWildlife;Richard.Beausoleil@dfw.wa.gov
GaryM.Koehler,WashingtonDepartmentofFishandWildlife;garykoehler@nwi.net
HilaryS.Cooley,LargeCarnivoreConservationLab,DepartmentofNaturalResources,WashingtonStateUniversity;Hilary_Cooley@fws.gov
RobertB.Wielgus,LargeCarnivoreConservationLab,DepartmentofNaturalResources,WashingtonStateUniversity;Wielgus@wsu.edu.
Abstract:Theproximityofcougars(Pumaconcolor)andpeoplehasalwaysbeenamanagementconcern,butlittleisknownofhowuseofresidentialareasisaffectedbyhousingdensitylevelsandpatterns.Weusedutilizationdistributions(UDs)derivedfromGPS,ARGOSandVHFcollardatafrom101cougarstocomparehowdifferentlevelsofresidentialdevelopmentinfluenceuseacross4studyareasinWashington.WecomparedtheUDsofcougarswithresidentialdevelopmentquantifiedfromcountytaxparceldatausingaWeibullmodelinganalysisandmultiplecomparisontechniques.Cougarsusedpredominantlyundevelopedparcelsatboththehectare( =98.09%ofuse,SD=3.12,n=101)andkm2( =81.59%,SD=15.60,n=101)scalesandusedecreasedwithincreasingresidentialdensities.Ninety‐ninepercentofcougaruseofresidentialareasinwesternWashingtonoccurredinareaswith≤846.0residences/km2,whichwassignificantlyhigherthanintheeasternWashingtonstudyareaswherecougarsusedareaswithresidentialdensities≤55.2residences/km2.Diffuse,lowdensitydevelopmentfacilitateshigherlevelsofcougaruse,butresidentialdevelopmentaturbandensitieswithadjacentwildlandhabitatcomprisedofdensevegetationappearstoincreasecougaruseofresidentialdevelopmentwithminimaldirectuseofdevelopedparcels.Wildlifemanagersandlandscapeplannerscouldusethemodeltoidentifyandmaintainwildlifecorridorsindevelopingareas,locationstoconstructhighwaycrossingstructurestopreserveconnectivity,reduceuseofresidentialareasbycougars,oridentifywherecougaruseofresidentialdevelopmentislikelytooccursoastotargeteducationandoutreachefforts.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
61
Session6:
PredatorsandPrey,Part1
Proceedingsofthe
11thMountainLionWorkshopIntegratingScientificFindingsintoManagement
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
62
ProgramCluster:identifyingpredationeventsthroughclusteredGPSdata
PeterJ.Mahoney,DepartmentofWildlandResources,UtahStateUniversity;pmahoney29@gmail.com
JulieK.Young,U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture,WildlifeServices;julie.young@usu.edu.
JohnA.Shivik,UtahDivisionofWildlifeResources;johnshivik@utah.gov
DavidC.Stoner,DepartmentofWildlandResources,UtahStateUniversity;david.stoner@usu.edu.
Abstract:Non‐parametrickerneldensityestimatorsarecommonlyusedtoclassifyhomerangesorutilizationdistributionsfromanimallocationdata.Here,weextendther‐LoCoHestimatorofGetzetal.(2007)usingtime‐constrainedconvexhulls.Thisextensionwasoriginallydevelopedwiththeintentofidentifyingpredationeventsusingglobalpositioningsystemdataderivedfrompredatorspace‐usemonitoringefforts,butcanbeappliedtoanysystemwherefrequentandaccuraterelocationdataareavailableandrelocationclusteringinspaceandtimeareindicativeofbehaviorsofinterest(i.e.denning,nesting).ThepresentmethodiswrappedinaPythonprogramcalledProgramClustertoalloweasyandrapidimplementationbyuserswithlimitedprogrammingknowledge.TheoutputfromProgramClusterresemblesafragmentedutilizationdistribution,witheachfragmentcorrespondingtoareasidentifiedasintenselyusedinthelocationdatabasedonuser‐specifiedspatialandtemporaltuningparameters.Further,eachfragmentcanbeinterpretedasanindividualutilizationdistributionwithmoreheavilyshadedregions(i.e.greatesthulloverlap)correspondingtoareaswiththehighestintensityofuse.Wediscusstheextendedr‐LoCoHmethod,programimplementation,andoutputinthecontextanon‐goingcougar(Felisconcolor)studyonMonroeMountain,FishlakeNationalForest,Utah.Cougarstrategiesoffeedingsiteselection:energymaximization,classicaloptimalforaging,orfeardrivenhumanaversion?
KevinA.Blecha,GraduateDegreePrograminEcology,ColoradoStateUniversity;Kevin.blecha@gmail.com
MatW.Alldredge,ColoradoParksandWildlife;Mat.Alldredge@state.co.us
RandallB.Boone,DepartmentofEcosystemScienceandSustainability,ColoradoStateUniversity;Randall.Boone@Colostate.edu
Abstract:Understandingpredatorforagingecologyinregionsofincreasinganthropogenicdevelopmentisimportantwhendevisingmanagementstrategiesto
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
63
reducecougar‐humanconflicts.Apureenergymaximizationstrategypredictsthatpatchuseofaforagingcougarisdrivenbytheselectionoflandscapefactorsthatmaximizeencounterswithprimarypreyspecies.However,previousresearchonfinescalepatch‐userarelyshowslinearrelationshipswithdirectmeasuresofpreyavailability.Apurefear‐drivenstrategypredictsthatpatchuseisdrivenbylandscapefactorsassociatedwithhigherriskofmortality.Whileitislogicalthatacougarwouldavoidareaslinkedtohigherratesofmortality,testingthishasbeenmetwithonlylimitedsuccess.Optimalforagingtheorywouldattempttoexplainpatchusageasabehavioralbalancingactbetweenenergymaximizationandfear‐drivenhumanaversion.Totestthis,measuresofpreyavailabilityandcougarusagemustbeattainedatscalessuitabletothebehavior.Anovelcameratrappingsurveytechniqueusing41,000trapnightswasusedtomodelthebackgroundencounterratesacrossthelandscapeofvariouspreyspeciesofcougars,withparticularemphasisonarangeofhousingdensities.Predictedfeedingsitelocationswerederivedfor49cougarsbyamodelusingatrainingsetof4,400clustersofground‐truthedGPSlocations.Usingconditionallogisticregressionanalysis,characteristicsoffeedingsites(humanhousing,backgroundpreyencounterprobabilities,andnaturalhabitat)werecomparedtocharacteristicsofGPSlocationswithinthepriortravellingsequencetotestthedegreeofoptimalforagingatafinespatialscale.Preliminaryresultsindicatedirectandindirectrelationshipsinreferencetohumansandbackgroundencounterratesofprimaryprey(deer).However,somedifficultiesarisewhenteasingoutadditionalinfluencesofhighlyusedalternativepreyspecies(i.e.,raccoon,domesticcat),whosebackgroundencounterratesaredrivenbythepresenceofhumandwellings.Estimatingmountainlion(Pumaconcolor)predationratesintherecentlyrecolonizedregionoftheLittleMissouriBadlands,NorthDakota,USA
DavidT.Wilckens,DepartmentofNaturalResourceManagement,SouthDakotaStateUniversity
JoshuaB.Smith,DepartmentofNaturalResourceManagement,SouthDakotaStateUniversity
StephanieA.Tucker,NorthDakotaGameandFishDepartment
DanielJ.Thompson,WyomingGameandFishDepartment
JonathanA.Jenks,DepartmentofNaturalResourceManagement,SouthDakotaStateUniversity
Abstract:Recentrecolonizationofmountainlions(Pumaconcolor)intotheBadlandsofNorthDakota,USAhasledtoquestionsonthepotentialimpactsofpredationonpreypopulationsintheregion.From2012‐2013,wedeployed9real‐timeglobalpositioningsystem(GPS)collarstoinvestigatemountainlionfeeding
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
64
habits.Wemonitoredmountainlionsfor1,845days,investigated506GPSclusters,andidentified292feedingevents.Weusedlogisticregressiontopredictfeedingeventsandsizeofpreyconsumedatanadditional535non‐investigatedclustersites.Ourtopmodelforpredictingpresenceofpreyitemsproducedareceiveroperatingcurve(ROC)scoreof0.90andanoverallaccuracyof81.4%;topmodelforpredictingpreysizehadaROCscoreof0.89andanoverallaccuracyof84.6%.ApplicationofourmodelstoallGPSclustersresultedinanestimatedungulatekillrateof1.09ungulates/week(95%CI=0.83–1.36)insummerand0.90ungulates/week(95%CI=0.69–1.12)inwinter.Weestimatedmountainlionsconsumed39.6kg/week(95%CI=30.4‐48.8)insummerand51.6kg/week(95%CI=37.4–65.8)inwinter.Overallscavengerateswere3.7%insummerand11.9%inwinter.Preycompositionincludedhigherproportionsofnon‐ungulatesinsummer(female=21.5%;male=24.8%)thaninwinter(female=4.8%;male=7.5%).ProportionofjuvenileungulatesinmountainliondietsincreasedfollowingtheungulatebirthpulseinJune(June–August=60.7%,95%CI=43.0–78.3;Sept‐May=37.2%,95%CI=30.8–43.7),resultinginanungulatekillrate1.61timeshigherduringfawningseason(1.41ungulates/week,95%CI=1.12–1.71)thanduringtheremainderoftheyear(0.88ungulates/week,95%CI=0.62–1.13).OurresultsdocumentfeedinghabitsofarecentlyrecolonizedmountainlionpopulationandwillincreaseeffectivemanagementofthisspeciesintheBadlandsRegionofNorthDakota.Estimatingcougar(Pumaconcolor)consumptionratesandpreycompositionintheBlackHills,SouthDakota.
JoshuaB.Smith,DepartmentofNaturalResourceManagement,SouthDakotaStateUniversity;Joshua.Smith@sdstate.edu
DavidT.Wilckens,DepartmentofNaturalResourceManagement,SouthDakotaStateUniversity
JohnBroecher,SouthDakotaDepartmentofGame,Fish,andParks
JonathanA.Jenks,DepartmentofNaturalResourceManagement,SouthDakotaStateUniversity
Abstract:Followingdeclinesinthe19thand20thcenturies,recentrangeexpansionsofcougars(Pumaconcolor)intotheupperMidwestarechallengingeffectivemanagementofthesenewpredator–preysystems.Theseregionsprovideauniqueopportunitytoassesstheroleofthisapexpredatoronpreypopulationdynamicsandecosystemprocessesinareaswhereanthropogenicinfluencesaresignificantlydifferent(e.g.,higherroaddensities,higherhumanpopulations)frompreviousstudies.Ourobjectiveswereto:1)determinepreycompositionofcougardiets,2)quantifyungulatekillrates,3)assesstheinfluenceofseasonanddemographicstatusonpredationrates,and4)determinetheinfluenceofscavengingonoverallcougarconsumptionratesintheBlackHills,SouthDakota.From2009–2012,we
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
65
captured41cougars(29females;11males)andusedglobalpositioningsystem(GPS)telemetrytolocate1,506feedingevents.Deer(Odocoileusspp.)comprisedthemajorityofcougardiets(83%),andincaseswherewecouldidentifyspecies,white‐taileddeer(Odocoileusvirginianus)dominated(63%).Overallungulatekillrateaveraged0.79ungulates/week,butwashighlyvariable(range=0.13–1.75ungulates/week)amongindividuals.Wefoundkillratesweresignificantlyhigher(P<0.001)insummer(x̄=0.92;95%CI=0.81–1.03)thaninwinter(x̄=0.62;95%CI=0.51–0.74);however,wefoundnodifferencesbydemographicstatus(e.g.,sex,age,orpresenceofcubs)withinthesameseason(summer:P=0.581;winter:P=0.607).Scavengingaccountedfor17.3%(n=260)ofallpreyitemsfoundintermsofrelativefrequencywithhigherratesobservedinwinter(x̄=0.21events/week)thaninsummer(x̄=0.08events/week).OurresultshighlighthowadaptableandopportunisticcougarsareatforagingforpreyandprovideinformationtodirectfuturecougarandungulatemanagementintheBlackHillsecoregion.Nowheretohide:pumas,blackbearsandcompetitionrefuges
L.MarkElbroch,Panthera;melbroch@panthera.org
PatrickE.Lendrum,Panthera;plendrum@panthera.org
MaximilianL.Allen,SchoolofBiologicalSciences,VictoriaUniversityofWellington;maximilian.allen@gmail.com
HeikoU.Wittmer,SchoolofBiologicalSciences,VictoriaUniversityofWellington;Heiko.Wittmer@vuw.ac.nz
Abstract:Interspecificcompetitionisasignificantinfluenceonthediversityandmembershipofcommunityassemblages,andaprevailingquestionishowcompetitivecarnivorescoexistwithoutthedominantcarnivoredrivingthesubordinatecompetitortolocalextinction.Onehypothesisisthatthesubordinatecarnivorerequiresandutilizes“competitionrefuges,”wheretheinfluencesofthedominantcompetitorareminimized.Americanblackbears(Ursusamericanus)aresympatricwithpumas(Pumaconcolor)acrossmostofthepuma’srangeinNorthAmerica,andadominantscavengerthatdisplacepumasfromtheirkills.Wetestedfortheeffectofblackbearkleptoparasitsimonpumasearchtime,handlingtimeandkillratesintwostudysystems:westernColoradoandnorthernCalifornia.Pumasexhibitedincreasedkillratesandshorterhandlingtimes,andselectedforsmallerprey,whenbearswereactive.OurResourceSelectionFunctionanalysesshowedthatwhenbearswereactive,theywereaslikelytofindpumakillsanywhereonthelandscape.Weconcludedthatduringthebearseason,pumascouldnoteffectivelyhidefromthem;insteadourresultssuggestedthatundiscoveredpumakillswererandomeventsorduetosomevariablewedidnottest.Further,ourfindingssuggestedthatbearkleptoparasitsmmaybedrivinghigherpumakillratesinthewarmerseasonswherethetwospeciesoverlap,whichhasimplicationsforbothcarnivoreandungulatemanagement,aswellaspotentiallyimpactingpumafitness.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
66
Session7:
PredatorsandPrey,Part2
Proceedingsofthe
11thMountainLionWorkshopIntegratingScientificFindingsintoManagement
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
67
Top‐downversusbottom‐upforcing:evidencefrommountainlionsandmuledeer
BeckyM.Pierce,SierraNevadaBighornSheepRecoveryProgram,CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife;cattrack@verizon.net
VernonC.Bleich,WildlifeInvestigationsLaboratory,CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife
KevinL.Monteith,DepartmentofBiologicalSciences,IdahoStateUniversity
R.TerryBowyer,DepartmentofBiologicalSciences,IdahoStateUniversity
Abstract:Westudiedmountainlions(Pumaconcolor)andmuledeer(Odocoileushemionus)inhabitingaGreatBasinecosysteminRoundValley,California,tomakeinferencesconcerningpredator–preydynamics.Ourpurposewastoevaluatetherelativeroleoftop‐downandbottom‐upforcingonmuledeerinthismultiple‐predator,multiple‐preysystem.Weidentifiedaperiodofdecline(by83%)ofmuledeer(1984–1990),andthenaperiodofslowbutsteadyincrease(1991–1998).Formuledeer,bitterbrush(Purshiatridentata)indiets,percapitaavailabilityofbitterbrush,kidneyfatindexes,fetalrates(youngperadultfemale),fetalweights,andsurvivorshipofadultsandyoungindicatedthattheperiodofdeclinewastypicalofadeerpopulationnearorabovethecarryingcapacity(K)ofitsenvironment.Numbersofmountainlionsalsodeclined,butwithalongtimelag.Theperiodofincreasewastypifiedbydeerdisplayinglife‐historycharacteristicsofapopulationbelowK,yetthefiniterateofgrowth(k¼1.10)remainedbelowwhatwouldbeexpectedforapopulationreboundingrapidlytowardK(k¼1.15–1.21)intheabsenceoflimitingfactors.Life‐historycharacteristicswereconsistentwiththemuledeerpopulationbeingregulatedbybottom‐upforcingthroughenvironmentaleffectsonforageavailabilityrelativetopopulationdensity;however,predation,mostlybymountainlions,waslikelyadditiveduringtheperiodofincreaseandthus,top‐downforcingslowedbutdidnotpreventpopulationgrowthofmuledeer.Theseoutcomesindicatethatresourceavailability(bottom‐upprocesses)hasanever‐presenteffectondynamicsofherbivorepopulations,butthattherelationshipcanbealteredbytop‐downeffects.Indeed,top‐downandbottom‐upforcescanactonpopulationssimultaneouslyand,thus,shouldnotbeviewedasastarkdichotomy.CougarpredationintheMojaveDesert:seasonalspatio‐temporaloverlapinfluencespreyselectionmorethanwateruse
DavidM.Choate,SchoolofLifeSciences,UniversityofNevadaLasVegas,&WesternEcologicalResearchCenter,U.S.GeologicalSurvey;choate.davidm@gmail.com
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
68
KathleenM.Longshore,WesternEcologicalResearchCenter,U.S.GeologicalSurvey;longshore@usgs.gov.
DanielB.Thompson,SchoolofLifeSciences,UniversityofNevadaLasVegas;daniel.thompson@unlv.edu.
Abstract:Cougar(Pumaconcolor)predationindesertenvironmentsmaybeenhancedwhenungulatepreyincreasetheiruseofwatersourcesduringsummermonths.Understandingtheconditionsinwhichdifferentfactorsinfluencepredationremainsanimportantissueforwildlifemanagers.Forwatersourcestofunctionasecologicaltrapsitisnecessarynotonlytodetectpredationeventsproximatetowatersources,butalsotodeterminethattheseeventsoccurmorefrequentlythanexpectedbyspatialoverlapofcougarsandprey.Weinvestigatedthespatio‐temporalpatternsofcougarpredationondesertungulatesinrelationtowateruseontheDesertNationalWildlifeRefuge(DNWR)NV,bytrackingGPS‐collaredcougarsandbighorn.Annualsurvivorshipforcollaredbighornwashigh(~93%).Cougarkillscomprised~64.3%muledeer(Odocoileushemionus)and30.3%bighornsheep,andoccurredclosertowatersources(3.4±2.4km)thanrandompoints(6.6±3.2km).However,only1killoccurredwithin200mofawatersourceand<5%ofallkillsoccurred<0.5kmfromwater(range=0.32–16.7km).Cougarlocationsweremorecloselyrelatedtosheeplocationsthanwatersources,withnosignificantdifferenceinspatialoverlapacrossseasons.Althoughbighornusedwatersourcesmostextensivelyduringdaylighthoursofsummermonths,asrecordedby24‐hcamera‐monitors,fewbighornwerekilledduringsummer.Instead,mostwerekilledduringwinter/springatthegreatestdistancesfromwatersources.Conversely,muledeerwerekilledacrossallseasons,despiteasimilarproximitytowatersources.Differentialuseofthelandscapebymuledeermayexplaintheirincreasedriskofpredationbycougarsinthisdesertenvironment.OntheDNWR,watersourcesdonotappeartofunctionasecologicaltraps;rather,seasonaldifferencesinspatio‐temporaloverlapinfluencetheriskofcougarpredationforpreymorethansimplyproximitytowatersources.VariationinpreyselectionandincidenceofindividualspecializationonnovelpreyintheGreatBasin
AlysonM.Andreasen,WildlifeConservationSociety;aandreasen@wcs.org
JonP.Beckmann,WildlifeConservationSociety;jbeckmann@wcs.org.
KelleyM.Stewart,NaturalResourcesandEnvironmentalSciences,UniversityofNevada,Reno;kstewart@cabnr.unr.edu
WilliamLongland,USDAAgriculturalResearchServices,UniversityofNevada,Reno;longland@unr.edu
CarlLackey,NevadaDepartmentofWildlife;clackey@ndow.org
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
69
Abstract:Variationinpredationbehaviorandpreyselectionofpredatorscanhaveimportantimplicationsforecology,conservationandmanagement.Wetestedhypothesespertainingtothedegreeofindividualdietspecialization,andpotentialfitnessconsequences,ofmountainlions(Pumaconcolor)inareaswithvaryingabundancesandtypesofpreyinthewesternGreatBasinandeasternSierraNevada.Wevisited1,330GPSclustersmadeby21mountainlions(7males;14females)fittedwithGPScollarsfrom2009‐2012.Wefollowedindividualsanaverageof55weeks(SD=36)andlocatedremainsofpredationeventsat804oftheclusterssearched(61%)comprising14species.Dietsvariedamongindividualswithinandbetweenmountainranges.Muledeerwerethemostcommonpreyinthedietsof13individualsandferalhorseswerethemostcommonpreykilledby8individuals.Tenof13mountainlionswithaccesstoferalhorsesinGreatBasinrangesconsumedhorsesasprey.However,therewasconsiderablevariationamongthedietsofthoseindividualswithsomeindividualsspecializingonhorsestothenearexclusionofotherpreyitems.InsomeareasoftheGreatBasin,feralhorsesprovidedecologicalopportunityforpreyspecializationwheremuledeerdensitieswererelativelylow;inareasoflowavailabilityoftotalprey,however,allindividualshadgeneralistforagingstrategies.Wefoundnodifferencebetweenspecialistsandgeneralistsinbiologicalcorrelatesoffitness.Nonetheless,ourresultssuggestthatpredationonferalhorsesinaridGreatBasinRangesmayresultinfitnesscomparabletothoseofmountainlionsinareaswheredensitiesofmuledeeraresubstantiallygreater,suchastheSierraNevada.Rangeabandonmentbyungulates:Predatoravoidanceorresponsetohabitatchangesinducedbydrought?
JeffreyT.Villepique,DepartmentofBiologicalSciences,IdahoStateUniversity;
BeckyM.Pierce,SierraNevadaBighornSheepRecoveryProgram,CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife;cattrack@verizon.net
VernonC.Bleich,SierraNevadaBighornSheepRecoveryProgram,CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife;vcbleich@gmail.com
AleksandraAndic,DepartmentofAstronomy;aleksandra.andic@gmail.com
R.TerryBowyer,DepartmentofBiologicalSciences,IdahoStateUniversity;bowyterr@isu.edu.
Abstract.Weinvestigatedinfluencesofriskofpredationbymountainlions(Pumaconcolor),measuresoftopographicruggednessatmultiplescales,andvegetation,land,andsnowcover,onresourceselectioninwinterbySierraNevadabighornsheep(Oviscanadensissierrae),anendangeredtaxon.Wehypothesizedthatthosemountainungulateswouldtradeoffrewardsaccruedfromuseofcriticallow‐elevationhabitatinwinterforthesafetyofareaswithreducedriskofpredation.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
70
Wealsoinvestigatedthetradeoffbetweenforageandriskofpredationbytestingthehypothesisthatdifferencesinqualityofforageatlow‐elevationsversushigh‐elevationswerereducedinyearsofbelow‐averageprecipitationthaninwetyears,yieldingareducedbenefitofmigrationtolow‐elevationsduringdroughtyears.SierraNevadabighornsheepdidnottradeoffbenefitsofforageforreducedriskofpredation,butselectedareasofhighsolarradiation,whereriskofpredationbymountainlionswasgreatest,whilemitigatingindirectriskofpredationbyselectingforsteep,ruggedterrain.Bighornsheepselectedmorestronglyforareaswheremountainlionswereactiveandkilledbighornsheep,thanforlowelevationhabitatinwinter,likelybecausemountainlionsweremostactiveinthoseareasofbighornwinterrangesoverlappingrangesofmuledeer(Odocoileushemionus),wherebothungulatesaccruedforagebenefits.Wedemonstratedreducedbenefitofmigrationtolowelevationduringdroughtyears,whenthedifferenceinqualityofforagewassignificantlylowerthaninyearsofabove‐averageprecipitation,providinganalternativeexplanationtothepredator‐inducedabandonmenthypothesisforthedisuseoflow‐elevationwinterrangeobservedduringdroughtyears.Demographicresponseofmuledeertoexperimentalreductionofcoyotesandmountainlions.
MarkA.Hurley,IdahoDepartmentofFishandGame
JamesW.Unsworth,IdahoDepartmentofFishandGame
PeterZager,IdahoDepartmentofFishandGame
MarkHebblewhite.WildlifeBiologyProgram,CollegeofForestryandConservation,UniversityofMontana
EdwardO.Garton.DepartmentofFisheriesandWildlifeResources,UniversityofIdaho
DebraM.Montgomery.DepartmentofFisheriesandWildlifeResources,UniversityofIdaho
JohnR.Skalski.SchoolofAquaticandFisherySciences,UniversityofWashington
CraigL.Maycock.UnitedStatesDepartmentofAgriculture,WildlifeServices
Abstract:WetestedtheefficacyofremovingcoyotesandmountainlionsonmuledeerpopulationdynamicsinsoutheasternIdaho,1997‐2006.Wemonitoredaspectsofmuledeerecologywhileexperimentallymanipulatingpredatorpopulationswithin10GameManagementUnits.Todeterminesurvivalandcausesofmortality,250neonates,2846‐month‐oldfawns,and254(521deeryears)adultfemalesweremonitoredwithradiotelemetryin2studysites,onewithcoyoteandmountainlionremovalandonewithout1998‐2002.Survivalofneonateswasrelatedtoalternatepreyabundance,coyoteremovalrates,andweatherconditions.Winterfawnsurvivalwasinfluencedbysummerprecipitation,winterprecipitation,
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
71
mountainlionremoval,andfawnmass.Adultfemalewintersurvivalincreasedwithmountainlionremoval.Decemberfawn‐to‐adultfemaleratios(fawnratios)increasedsignificantlyatmaximumratesofmountainlionremoval.Coyoteremovalhadnosignificanteffectonfawnratios,exceptafteraweather‐relatedpopulationreduction.Coyoteormountainlionremovalalonedidnotinfluencemuledeerpopulationgrowthrate,althoughthetopmodel,includingpreviousyear’smountainlionremovalandwinterseverity,explained27%ofthevarianceinpopulationrateofincrease.Thelackoffawnratioorpopulationresponsetocoyotereductionindicatesthatdecreasedneonatemortalityduetocoyoteremovalispartiallycompensatory.Mountainlionremovalincreasedmuledeersurvivalandfawnratios,producingaminimalpositiveeffectongrowthrates.However,weobservedsomeevidenceforcompensatorymortalityinadultfemalemuledeerduringperiodsofprolongedmountainlionremovalandwhencoupledwithsignificantweathereffectsmayreducetheeffectofpredatorremovalonpopulationgrowthrate.PanelQ&A,PredatorsandPrey.
Participants:BeckyPierce,AlysonAndreasen,DaveChoate,MarkHurley,&JeffVillepique
Moderator:DavidStoner
Thefollowingisadaptedfromatape‐recordingofthediscussion.Questionsandresponseshavebeenshortenedandarenotverbatim.Q:Aproblemwehavewithmanagingwildlifeisthecomplexityoftheenvironment.Ourtoolsarefairlycoarse.Ultimatelymostpopulationsarefoodlimited.Withrespecttopumacontrolorharvestbeingacommonmanagementtactictoenhancepreynumbersandsurvival,atwhatpointinthecyclemightpumapredationbeadditive?Wheremightpredatorremovalhavesomebeneficialeffect?Becky–BasedonourresearchothermortfactorsbecomemoreadditivewhenapreypopulationisbelowK.Weseefluctuationsbetweenforageanditsimpactondeerfetalratesandrecruitmentbecauseotherfactorscomeintoplay.ForpredatorremovaltobeeffectiveyouneedtoknowtherelationshipofthepreytoK.Ifthepreyareinpoorconditionbecauseofdensitydependenteffects,muchofpredationiscompensatoryandpredatorcontrolwon’tmakemuchdifference.Q‐Whatinfluencehaveyouhadonpublicperceptionsconcerningpredationandpredatorcontrol?
Becky–Includinglocalsintheresearchmadeabigdifference.Forexample,volunteersthatwentouttolocatecollareddeerwouldsee1collarinagroupof50deerandrealizethedeerpopulationwashigherthantheyrealized.However,CAis
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
72
differentthanotherareas;thevariouspublicsdemandthatcontroleffortsbewelljustified.Alyson–Initiallythesportsmen’sgroupsweapproachedthoughttheykneweverything.Somesurprisingresultsopenedthepublic’seyes.Astohowpredationonhorseshasbeenperceived,thesportsmenthinkitisgreat.AlthoughIthoughthorseadvocateswouldbeupset,theyseemtoappreciatetheresultsandthatpumapredationonhorses(aspeciesthatwasassumedtohavenopredators)actuallyhelpstheircause.Mark–Wespentasignificantamountoftimetalkingtopeople.Talkingtosportsmenseemedtohelp.Alotofthestudywasfundedbysportsmenandtherewasabetteracceptanceoftheresults(whichwerecontrarytowhattheyexpected)becausetheyhelpedfundit.Dave–Sportsmendirectlyinvolvedwiththeresearchweremoresupportive.Therewasadifferenceinpublicperceptionsbasedonwheretheylivedinthestate.LasVegaswasdifferentthanotherpartsofthestate.Thegeneralpublichadapoorunderstandingofwhatdensityisallabout,showingsurprisethatanimalscouldsurviveontheharshlandscapeandthatindividualsneededsomuchspace.Jeff–Providedtheobservationthatitiseasiertoconveyresultsshowingpredationisnotlimitingthepreywhenyouhavegrowingpopulationsofungulates.Q–Thereisannualvariationinweatherpatterns,andtheestimatesofK.Howcanweincorporatethisinformationintoatimelymanagementresponse?Dowehaveenoughtimetogetregulationsinplacetoachieveapredatorcontrolgoal?Mark–WeareconductingpredatorcontrolinIdahorightnow.Weneedspecialconditionstomakepredatorcontrolwork.Ourstructureis2yearsout.SowhatID’sdoneisthatwesawlionremovalhadsomeeffectsoweincreasedquotas.Howevertheincreasesareprobablynotenoughbecauseweneedtoremovealotmoretocauseaneffect.Wearenotkillingmanymorelionsthanwewerebefore.Weknowthatcoyotecontrolonthefawningrangeiswherewecanmakeadifference.Becky–WeneedtoconsidertherelationshipofpreytoK.Wewereluckytofindthatbitterbrushleadergrowthwasacriticalfactor.That’ssomethingyoucando(measure).Anothermeasureisscoringdeerbodyconditioninthefield.Ratherthanpredator,golookattheprey(it’seasierandcheaper).Alyson–Ourresultsmightsuggestthatathighdensitiesofprey,thebestapproachistoonlyremoveindividualpredatorsthataredoingdamageisthebestapproach.Whenpreydensitiesarelow,abroadbrushapproachtopredatorremovalmaybemoreeffective.David–Thewindowofinferencemaybeshorttermobservation.Butwerespondtolong‐termissues.Workwithpublictoexplainthatwecan’tmanageseasonto
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
73
season.Wecouldincorporatenoninvasiveassessmentssuchascameratrapsatwatersourcestodeterminepreycondition.Easiertodowithsheepthandeer.Q.Mark,inyourexperimentalremovalofpredators,didyoufindmeso‐predatorreleaseanddidthathaveanimpactonfawnmortality.Also,doyouthinkit’spossiblethattheconstantremovalofterritorialanimalsresultsinanartificiallylargepredatorpopulation?Mark–Wehadsomeanecdotalobservationsofincreasedbobcatmortalityonfawns.Removalratesandsocialdynamicswascertainlyanissueincoyotes;wehadnoopportunitytolookatthepumasocialsystem.However,thepumakittensthatwedidcollaremigratedtoareawherewewereremovingpumasandallwerekilled.Q.Alyson,wherewerethepumaskillingthehorses?Alyson–Horseswerekilledwherevertheywereactive:acrossshaleslopes,incanyonbottoms,inopensagebrush.Itwasreallyvariable.Q.Didanyofyourstudiesshowanylong‐termdemographicconsequences?Becky–Wesawashiftinmigrationpatternsofdeer,butwethinkthiswascausedbybearpredationonfawns.Aprimarymigratorypatternceasedtobethebestchoice.Mark–Anolderagestructureinthedoesleadstosenescence.Adultdeerstartintosenescenceatabout6.5years.Theseolderdeerproducefewerfawns.Manydeerpopulationshaveanolderdoeagestructuresoanythingwecandotoreducetheageonthedoeswouldhelp.DaveStoner’sclosingstatement:Frommanagementstandpointitisimportanttoincreaseeffortsatconveyingsciencetothevariouspublicsthatweserve.Therehasbeenalotofbasicresearchpresentedthismorning,Itwillbenicetoseeitappliedinthefuture.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
74
Session8:
FelidsandHumans,Part1
Proceedingsofthe
11thMountainLionWorkshopIntegratingScientificFindingsintoManagement
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
75
Correlatesofpuma‐livestockconflictsintheEspinalofCentralArgentina
MauroLucherini,GECM,Cát.FisiologíaAnimal,DepartamentoBiología,BioquímicayFarmacia,Argentina;lucherinima@yahoo.com
MariaGuerisoli,GECM,Cát.FisiologíaAnimal,DepartamentoBiología,BioquímicayFarmaciaArgentina;mariadelasmercedesguerisoli@gmail.com
NicolasCaruso,GECM,Cát.FisiologíaAnimal,DepartamentoBiología,BioquímicayFarmacia,UNS‐CONICET,Argentina;nccaruso@gmail.com
EmmaCasanave,GECM,Cát.FisiologíaAnimal,DepartamentoBiología,BioquímicayFarmacia,UNS‐CONICET;casanave@criba.edu.ar
EstelaLuengosVidal,GECM,Cát.FisiologíaAnimal,DepartamentoBiología,BioquímicayFarmacia;eluengos@gmail.com
Abstract:Puma(Pumaconcolor)stillhasawidespreaddistributioninArgentina.However,manypopulationsarethreatenedbyhabitatdestructionanddirectkillingassociatedtothespreadingofcroplandsandranchlands.ThisisthecaseofpumasinhabitingtheEspinalofthecentralArgentinalowlands,anecoregionmarkingthetransitionfromthePampasgrasslands,wherethepumahasalmostgoneextinct,totheMontewoodlands.Inthisregion,theintensefragmentationofnaturalhabitatsanddecreaseofnativepreyhasincreasedtheencroachmentofpumaswithlivestock.Retaliatorykilling,whichisthecommonresponsetopumapredationoncattle,isincreasingandlocalranchersarerequestingalegalbountysystemtohuntpumas.WereporttheresultsofthefirststepsofaprojectaimingtounderstandtheecologyofpumapopulationsintheEspinal,characterizepuma‐livestockconflicts,andidentifyconflictmitigationstrategies.Our148semi‐structuredinterviewstolocalranchersshowedthat45.7%ofrespondentsthinkthatpumascausemajordamage,47.5%reportedlossescausedbypumasinthepreviousyearand70.2%consideredthatpredatorcontrolwasthebestsolutiontoconflicts.Landscape‐scalecameratrapsurveys(totalinganeffortof7054trap‐days)produced45recordsofpumasin11.5%of184samplingstations.Apreliminaryhabitatsuitabilityanalysisbasedon110presencerecordssuggeststhatmostsuitablelocationsforpumawereawayfromcroplandorurbanareasandfromthemainroads,distancestoroadsandtoscrublandpatcheswerethevariablesaffectingthemostitsnichebreadth,andonly16.3%oftheregionhasahighqualityforthisfelid.OurresultssuggestthatwhereaspumasincentralArgentinamaytoleratesomedegreeofhabitatdegradationandhuman‐relatedmortality,humansarerarelywillingtotolerateeconomiclossescausedbydepredationandthatconflictmitigationmeasuresarerequiredtoensurepumaconservation.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
76
RoadimpactsonmountainlionsinOrangeCounty,California:usingmultipledatatypestoprioritizemanagementactions
PatrickR.Huber,InformationCenterfortheEnvironment,UniversityofCalifornia,Davis;prhuber@ucdavis.edu
T.WinstonVickers,WildlifeHealthCenter,UniversityofCalifornia,Davis;twvickers@ucdavis.edu
WalterM.Boyce,SchoolofVeterinaryMedicine,UniversityofCalifornia,Davis;wmboyce@ucdavis.edu
Abstract:Roadimpactsareathreattomanyspeciesdueprimarilytohabitatfragmentationanddirectmortalityfromvehiclecollisions.WestudiedtheeffectsofarelativelynewhighwayonmountainlionsandseveralotherspeciesinOrangeCounty,California.Weusedthreedifferenttypesofdata:roadkillrecords,GPScollardata,andleastcostconnectivitymodels.Roadkillrecordsindicatedthat11mountainlionshadbeenkilledbycarsinthe15milelongstudyareasincehighwayconstruction,withanadditional6killedonanothersectionofthehighwayoratitsjunctionswithotherroads.MountainlionGPScollardatawerecollectedatvaryingintervalsfromeveryfiveminutestoeverysixhours.GPSpointstakenatfiveminuteintervalswereusedtoidentify20crossinglocations,andleastcostconnectivitymodelsusinglongerintervaldatawereutilizedtoestimatethelocationsof55additionalcrossingevents.Becauseimpactswerebeingassessedformultiplespecies,deersurveyandroadkilldatawereusedtoidentifyareasofhighriskforotherspecies.Thehighwaysectionbeingstudiedwasthensplitinto500‐metersegments.Thevariousdatawerecombinedintoafinalimpactscoreandvalueswereassignedtoeach500‐metersegment.Resultsarecurrentlybeingusedtoprioritizemanagementactionsbythehighwaymanagementagency,includinginstallationofextensivenewfencingandmonitoringofexistingcrossingstructureswithcameras.Inaddition,weusedthedatatoadvisetheagencyonthedesignofapotentialfutureextensionofthehighwayinordertoreducetheexpectedimpactsonmountainlionsandotherspecies.AnoverviewofpumadepredationtrendsinCalifornia,1972‐2013
AnneM.Orlando,FelidaeConservationFund;anne@felidaefund.org
MarcKenyon,CaliforniaDept.ofFishandWildlife;marc.kenyon@wildlife.ca.gov
Abstract:Factorsrelatingtomountainliondepredationsincludegeographicattributes(landscapescale),propertyattributes(propertyscale),andattributesofthedepredatingindividual(organismalscale).WeexpandonpreviousworkbyapplyingGeographicInformationSystemsmethodsandclassificationtreeanalysistoCalifornia’sstatewidepumadepredationpermitdatabase,whichcontainsrecords
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
77
from1972–2013.Thesemethodsallowustodiscernrelationshipsbetweenenvironmentalandorganismalvariablesaffectingdepredationpatternsthatcouldotherwisebeobscuredbyimpactsofscale.Wesupplementthisanalysisbyincludingrecordsinthestate’spumanecropsydatabase,whichcontainsnecropsyrecordsofnearlyallpumastakenpursuanttodepredationpermitsfrom1993–2013.Here,wepresentdescriptivestatisticsandanalysesexplicatingtemporalandspatialtrendsinfrequencyofpumadepredation,domesticspeciesaffected,environmentalandgeographiccorrelates,andmitigatingfactorsthatmustbeconsideredwhenexaminingthesedata.Wediscusshowthesefactorscaninformlocalwildlifemanagementandecologicalconservationplanningefforts.CougarspaceuseonalandscapewithhighlevelsofanthropogenicdisturbanceinsouthcentralUtah
JulieK.Young,U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture,WildlifeServices;julie.young@usu.edu
PeterJ.Mahoney,DepartmentofWildlandResources,UtahStateUniversity;pmahoney29@gmail.com
Abstract:Weevaluatedcougar(Pumaconcolor)spaceuseinrelationtogeneralpatternsofhumanlandscapeuseonMonroeMountaininsouthcentralUtah.CougarsonMonroeMountainareexposedtoheavyhumanpressurebothdirectlyduringchase,limited‐entry,andharvestobjectiveseasonsduringthewinterandspringandmoreindirectlyduetotrafficassociatedwithrecreationalOHVactivityandgamehunterusethroughoutthesummerandfall.Toassesshowcougarsrespondtohumanactivity,weevaluatedrelativeselection(RSFwithausedvs.availabledesign)usingBayesiangeneralizedlinearmixedmodelswithweaklyinformativepriorsandarandomeffectofindividualtoaccountfordifferencesinindividualsamplingintensity.Seasonalhomeranges(99%isopleths)weregeneratedforeachindividualwithinourdatasetusingakerneldensityestimatorwithapluginbandwidthestimationalgorithm.Availabilitywasestimatedsystematicallyusingacompletecensusof30meterpixelswithineachhomerange.Distancetosecondaryandtertiaryroads,distancetowater,distancetonearesthumanresidence,ruggedness,aspect,slope,andvegetativecoverwerecalculatedforeachusedandavailablepointwithinthedatasetandutilizedasexplanatoryfixedeffectsintheRSFmodel.Wecomparedcougarresponsetoroadsandhumanresidenceacrossseasonsandbetweennightanddayinanefforttoidentifypatternsofcougarresponsetohumanactivity.Ourresultssuggestillustratetheindirectimpactshumanshaveoncougarsandtheneedformorestudiesthatdirectlyaccountforhumanactivitywhenevaluatingspatialandhabitatuse.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
78
Livestockandlions:Aresearchprogramtolearncoexistencestrategies
HarleyG.Shaw;hgshaw@windstream.net
DavidJ.Mattson,PeopleandCarnivores;davidjmattson@gmail.com(Presenter)
ElizabethA.Haynes,SchoolofNaturalResourcesandEnvironment,UniversityofArizona;lynx@email.arizona.edu
SethM.Wilson,PeopleandCarnivores;swilson@bigsky.net
Abstract:Conservationofecologicallyfunctionalpopulationsofcougars(Pumaconcolor)isdependent,inpart,onreducingconflictswithlivestockproducersandreducingrelatedpreventativeorretaliatorykills.Appreciabledepredationoflivestockbycougarsislargelyrestrictedtoeithersheeportocowcalvesinwarmsemi‐aridtoaridregions.OurpreliminaryinvestigationsinArizonasuggestthatterrainruggedness,warmth,andariditytogetherengenderhusbandrypracticesthatleadtogreateravailabilityofvulnerablecowcalves.Wehypothesizethatpolledbreeds,cow‐calfoperations,lowstockingdensities,andyear‐roundbreedingandcalvingareattherootofproblematicdynamics,inplacesamplifiedbysource‐sinkdynamicsthatrecruityoungdispersingcougarsintolivestock‐producingareas.Giventhepotentialimportanceofcoexistencebetweenlivestockandcougarstolong‐termconservationofcougarpopulations,weadvocatealarge‐scaleresearchefforttotesttheefficacyofdifferenthusbandrypracticesinreducingcougardepredation.Suchaprogramwouldideallyfocusonrangeswithhistoriesofdepredationandemploycontrolsthroughapaireddesign.Candidatetreatmentswouldincludeuseofmoreaggressivehornedbreeds,abbreviationofbreedingandcalvingseasons,andconcentrationofcalvingcowsunderconditionswheretheycouldbegivengreaterprotection.Executionofsuchstudieswould,ataminimum,dependuponrecruitingrancherstoparticipateandfindingfinancialresourcestoalleviatetheeconomiccostsandrisksofparticipation.Werecommendthatanysuchstudyincludeassessmentofeconomicfeasibilityandpracticalitytotherancher,aswellaspotentialimpactonrangecondition.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
79
Session9:
FelidsandHumans,Part2
Proceedingsofthe
11thMountainLionWorkshopIntegratingScientificFindingsintoManagement
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
80
Floridapantherrecovery:Livestockdepredation,predationriskmaps,andnewapproachestocompensationprograms
CaitlinJacobs,UniversityofFlorida,Dept.WildlifeEcologyandConservation;caitlin.jacobs@ufl.edu
MartinMain,UniversityofFlorida,Dept.WildlifeEcologyandConservation;mmain@ufl.edu
Abstract:CalfdepredationbythefederallyendangeredFloridapanther(Pumaconcolorcoryi)onranchesinsouthwestFloridaisanimportantissuebecauseranchesprovidehabitatcriticaltopantherrecovery.Asthepantherpopulationincreases,conflictbetweenranchersandpantherswilllikelyincreaseaswell.Tobetterunderstandthisconflict,thegoalsofthisstudyweretoquantifycalfdepredationbypanthersontworanchesinsouthwestFlorida,identifyfactorsthatinfluencepredationrisk,anddeveloppredationriskmapstoinformmanagementdecisions.Tomonitorcalflossweeartagged409calveswithVHFtransmittersontworanchesduring2011‐2013.Weevaluatedcalfmortalitiesforcauseofdeathandplacedcameratrapsatcachesitestoidentifyindividualpanthers.WeusedArcGISandFragstatstoquantifylandscapevariablesaroundeachkillsiteandforeachranch.WedevelopedpredationriskmapswithMaxEntusinglandscapevariablesandpantherGPSdata.Calfdepredationbypanthersvariedbetweenranches,withanaveragecalflosstopanthersof5.3%/yearonRanchAand0.5%/yearonRanchB.Pantherskilledcalvesrangingfrom<1weekoldand<25kgto>8monthsoldand>150kg.Cameratrapdatarevealedthatpanthersofdifferentagesandsexeskilledcalvesandthatsomepanthersmademultiplekills.LandscapeanalysisindicatedthatRanchAcontainedagreaterpercentageandpatchdensityofuplandforest,greaterconnectivitybetweenforestpatches,greateredgedensity,andsmallerpatchesofimprovedpasturethanRanchB.TheseresultssuggestthatthelandscapeonRanchAmayprovideamoreoptimalhuntingenvironmentforpanthers.MaxEntresultssuggestthatpredationriskmapscaninformconflictmitigationstrategiesandpotentiallyhelptostructurecompensationprogramsthatarebasedonlandscapefeaturesratherthanonverifiedkills.Conflictwithoutend:Cougardepredationineast‐centralArizona
DavidJ.Mattson,PeopleandCarnivores;davidjmattson@gmail.com
ErinSavage,AppalachianVoices,erin@appvoices.org
SusanG.Clark,SchoolofForestry&EnvironmentalStudies,YaleUniversity;susan.g.clark@yale.edu
Abstract:GrahamandGreenleecountiesineast‐centralArizonahaveexperiencedhighlevelsofcougar(Pumaconcolor)predationoncowcalvesforatleastthelast20
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
81
years.Killsofcougarsfordepredationcontrolinthesetwocomparativelysmallcountieshaveaccountedfor62%ofthestate’stotal.Ouranalysisofthiscasesuggeststhathighlevelsofdepredationarenotadequatelyexplainedbydensitiesofcougars,cattle,ornativeprey.Morelikely,thispatternofdepredationconflictisduetohusbandrypracticesrootedineconomicnecessityandunproductiverangeconditions,coupledwithinstitutionalizeddepredationcontrol.Moststakeholdersactiveinthiscaseseemtosharetheviewthatnatureisprimarilysomethingtobedominatedandutilized.Butdivergentgoalsarisefromdifferencesintheextenttowhichstakeholdersvalueconservationoflionsforhunting,prioritizelivestockrearingforprofit,ordistrustgovernment.Wefoundlittleevidencetosuggestthatcurrentpracticesandperspectivesservedanyone’smaterialinterests.Calflossesandkillsoflionsfordepredationcontrolpersistathighlevelswhichpotentiallyjeopardizeregionalsporthuntingandconservationoflions.Currentmanagementoflionsaffirmsprevailingworldviews,whichmakeslethalcontroloflionsa“necessity,”butwithoutresolvinganyon‐the‐groundproblems.Althoughalternativescanbeimagined,limitedresources,limitedsalience,andprevailingworldviewswillverylikelyperpetuatecurrentdynamicsintheshortterm.Longerterm,patternsofdepredationsandassociatedhumanbehaviorsinthisregionwillmorelikelybechangedbylarge‐scaleclimaticandeconomicforcescurrentlyreconfiguringwildlifemanagementandranchinginthesemi‐aridWest.AnintegratedregionaloutreachandresearchmodelforwildlifeconservationacrosstheSanFranciscoBayArea
ZaraMcDonald,FelidaeConservationFund;zara@felidaefund.org
AnneM.Orlando,FelidaeConservationFund;anne@felidaefund.org
AllyC.Nauer,FelidaeConservationFund;allycat@felidaefund.org
Abstract:TheSanFranciscoBayAreahostsavibrantandexpandingeconomyandanenvironmentallyconcernedpopulace.Heavilydevelopedareasandcongestedhighwaysabutcriticalnetworksofprotectedopenspaceandlargeworkingranches.Weprovideanoverviewofregion‐widecollaborativeeffortstomodel,designandconservefunctionalnetworksofcontiguouswildlifehabitat.Yet,inadditiontoscientificallyvalidconservationdesign,sustainingwildlifecommunitiesrequiresaddressingdifferingconcernsforurbanedgeversusruralresidents.WedescribethecombinedecologicalresearchandoutreachmodelwehavedesignedtoincorporatethesedistinctpopulacesintotheworkoftheBayAreaPumaProject,alandscape‐scaleresearchandconservationprogram.Urbanedgepumaconservationneedsincludeidentifyinglandscapemovementbarriers;providingsafehighwaycrossings;protectinglandscape‐scalecorridors;alleviatingdepredationonpetsandhobbyanimals;identifyingandalleviatinginadvertentpoisoning;addressinghumanlevelsoffearanddefiningsafetythreats;anddevelopingprotocolsforremovingpumasfromhigh‐densityresidentialareas.Incontrast,wherethesamepumas’
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
82
homerangesintersectruralranches,potentialimpactsonlivestock,interactionswithdeerpopulation,andoccasionally,inadvertentpoisoningbecomethemainconcerns.WepresentdatafrompumaGPScollars,GIS‐basedanalyses,andfindingsfrom3seasonsofregion‐widecamera‐trappingthatdocumentedvaryingoccupancyandactivitypatternsofpumasandothermammalsbetweenurbanedgeandruralenvironments.Wedescribehowwehaveusedthesefindingsandinputfromdiversehumancommunitiestodynamicallylinkresearchwithruralandurbanstakeholderoutreachandinvolvement.Theprojectthuscreatestheimpetusforlandscapeconservationoutcomeswithintheprocessofconductingaresearchprogram,fromchoosingappropriatequestionstoconductingfieldwork,andfromanalysistocollaborativemanagementplanning.BanquetSpeech
MichaelL.Wolfe,ProfessorEmeritus,UtahStateUniversityAbstract:Thisnarrativeweavesataleofhumankind’srelationshipwithpredatoryanimalslargelywithinthecontextofwesternculture.Fromprehistorictimeshumansdevelopedconflictedrelationshipswithlargecarnivores,perhapsstemmingfrommutualkleptoparasatismandbiophobia.Withthedevelopmentofpastoralandagrariansocietiestheserelationshipsmorphedintoaculturalenmitywithcertainlargepredatorsincorporatedintolegendandfolkloreandabettedbytheadventofnon‐animisticmonotheisticreligions.However,notalllargepredatorsperceivedwereviewedequallywiththewolfbeingalmostuniversallyreviledandlionsandbearswereviewedinsomewhatmorefavorableterms.EuropeancolonistsbroughtthesetraditionswiththemwhentheysettledNorthAmericaandappliedtheanti‐predatormentalityvigorouslyintheirconquestoftheAmericanfrontier.Thisresultedinavirtualpogromagainstpredators,andtheneareradicationofseverallargecarnivoresbythe20thcentury.Withthedemiseoflargerpredators,thecoyotebecametheprincipaltargetofpredatorcontrolefforts.However,thereemergedinthelatterhalfofthatcenturyamoreenlightenedperceptionoflargecarnivores,largelyoccasionedbytheresearchandteachingsofseveralvisionaryecologistsandthewritingsofseveralpopularauthors.Changingpublicattitudesresultedinoftencontroversialeffortstoprotectandrestorelargecarnivores.Thepastseveraldecadeshavewitnessedaveritableexplosioninpredation‐relatedresearchenhancedbysignificantadvancesintechnologyandairedpubliclyinmodernmedia.Thisworkandaparadigmshiftinecologyhaveresultedindevelopmentandslowacceptanceofamodernsynthesis,wherebypredatorsareviewedintheirappropriateanddiverseecologicalrolesneitherasuniversalvillainsormessiahs.However,attitudestowardspredatoryanimalsremainsharplypolarizedandsignificantchallengespersist.Theseincluderangeexpansionorrecolonizationbycoyotesandcougarsaswellconcernsforhumansafetypromptedbythepresenceofpotentiallydangerousanimalsinnearurbanenvironments.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
83
Session10:
Non‐invasiveTechniques
Proceedingsofthe
11thMountainLionWorkshopIntegratingScientificFindingsintoManagement
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
84
EstimatingCougarDensitiesinnortheastOregonUsingConservationDetectionDogs
GregoryA.Davidson,FindItDetectionDogs;greg@finditdetectiondogs.com
DarrenA.Clark,OregonCooperativeFishandWildlifeResearchUnit,DepartmentofFisheriesandWildlife,OregonStateUniversity;Darren.A.Clark@state.or.us.
BruceK.Johnson,OregonDepartmentofFishandWildlife;bruce.k.johnson@state.or.us
LisetteP.Waits,DepartmentofFishandWildlifeSciences,UniversityofIdaho;lwaits@uidaho.edu
JenniferR.Adams,DepartmentofFishandWildlifeSciences,UniversityofIdaho,;adamsj@uidaho.edu
Abstract:Estimatingdensitiesofcougar(Pumaconcolor)isimportantformanagingcougarsandtheirpreybutremainschallengingduetocougar’selusiveandsolitarybehavior.Traditionalmethodsforestimatingabundanceanddensityofcougarsrequireseveralyearsofextensiveandexpensivemark‐recapturework.Toevaluateanon‐invasive,geneticcapture‐recapturemethodtoestimatecougarpopulationsizeanddensity,wesurveyeda220‐km2areausingconservationdetectiondogstrainedtolocatescatovera4‐weeksamplingperiodinnortheastOregon.Wecollected272scatsamplesandconductedDNAanalysison249samplesfromwhichwedeterminedindividualidentificationfrom73samplesthatrepresented21cougars(9malesand12females).Weevaluated4modelstoestimatecougardensities:Hugginsclosedpopulationmark‐recapture(Huggins),CAPWIRE,multipledetectionswithPoisson(MDP),andspatiallyexplicitcapturerecapture(SECR).Populationestimatesforcougarsusingourstudyareawere26(95%CI=22–35,9malesand17females)fromHugginsmodels,24(95%CI=21–30,9malesand15females)fromCAPWIRE,and27(95%CI=24–42,9males,18females)fromtheMDPmodel.Weaccountedfortheedgeeffectindensityestimatescausedbyindividualswhosehomerangesincludedonlyaportionofthesurveygridbybufferingthestudyareausingthemeanhomerangeradiusof8cougarsequippedwithGlobalPositioningSystemcollarsonornearthestudyarea.Weestimateddensitiesof4.6cougars/100km2(CI=3.8–8.3)fortheHugginsmodel,4.8cougars/100km2(CI=4.2–7.8)fortheMDPmodel,4.2cougars/100km2(CI=3.3–5.3)fortheCAPWIREmodel,and5.0cougars/100km2(CI=3.2–7.7)fortheSECRmodel.Ourresultssuggestedestimatingcougardensitiesusingscatdetectiondogscouldbefeasibleatabroaderscaleatconsiderablylesseffortoverashorterdurationthantraditionalmark‐recapturemethods.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
85
DNA‐baseddietidentificationofmountainlionsinsouthwesternArizona
JohnClemons,ArizonaDesertBighornSheepSociety;clemonsjp@aol.com
AshwinNaidu,SchoolofNaturalResourcesandtheEnvironment,UniversityofArizona;ashwin@email.arizona.edu
MelanieCulver,GraduateInterdisciplinaryPrograminGeneticsandSchoolofNaturalResourcesandtheEnvironment,UniversityofArizona;mculver@email.arizona.edu
Abstract:Mountainlion(Pumaconcolor)dietshavelongbeenasubjectofcontroversyandhavebeenstudiedusingvariousmethodsinthepast30years.Mostearlyattemptstoascertainpredatordietwerefocusedonmethodsemployinganalysesofcontentsinfecesbasedonmorphologicalidentificationofhairandbonefragments.Thesemethodscanbesubjecttosignificantvariationinindividualinterpretationandcanlackincertaintyofidentificationofthepreyspeciesconsumedbypredators.Inthisstudyweemploygeneticanalysesofscatcontentstoidentifymountainlionprey.Weopportunisticallycollected152scatsamplessuspectedtobeofmountainlioninoriginfrommountainrangesinsouthwesternandsouthcentralArizonaduring2006–2012.Weamplifiedandsequenceda472bpfragmentofthemitochondrialcytochromebgenetoidentifypredatorspecies.Weconfirmed77(50.7%)scatstobefrommountainlions.Wedismantledthesemountainlionscatstorecoverboneandconnectivetissuefragmentscontainedtherein.Wethenpulverizedthesefragmentsinafreezermillandidentifiedpreyspeciesalsousingthecytochromebgene.Ourpreliminaryresultsdemonstratedthatmountainliondietconsistedof44%muledeer(Odocoileushemionus)and27%desertbighornsheep(Oviscanadensis)asthemajorpreyitems,amongotherminorpreyitems.Withseasonaldivisionofdiet,weobservedapotentialpositivecorrelationbetweenmountainlionpredationandthedesertbighornsheeplambingseason,andaninverserelationshipbetweenmuledeeranddesertbighornsheeppredation.WeconcludedthatDNA‐basedidentificationisaneffectivetoolingeneratingdataonmountainliondiets,andsuchdatacanbeusefulforwildlifemanagement,particularlyinmodelingtheimpactofpredationandvulnerabilityofpreyspeciestomountainlions.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
86
PumaPlex:Arapidandhigh‐throughputmethodtogenotypesinglenucleotidepolymorphismsinmountainliontissuesandscats
RobertR.Fitak,InstitutfürPopulationsgenetik,VeterinärmedizinischeUniversitätWien,Vienna,Austria;rfitak9@gmail.com
AshwinNaidu,SchoolofNaturalResourcesandtheEnvironment,UniversityofArizona;ashwin@email.arizona.edu
MelanieCulver,GraduateInterdisciplinaryPrograminGeneticsandSchoolofNaturalResourcesandtheEnvironment,UniversityofArizona;mculver@email.arizona.edu
Abstract:Populationgeneticanalyseshavebecomeapowerfultoolfortheconservationandmanagementofwildlifepopulations.However,themostcommongeneticmarkers,microsatellites,oftenincurahighcostofexamination,sufferfromhomoplasy,andproducedatadifficulttocompareacrossstudies.Recently,alternativegeneticmarkers,calledsinglenucleotidepolymorphisms(SNPs),havereceivedmuchattentionfortheiranalyticalsimplicity,high‐throughputcapabilities,consistencyacrossstudies,andpotentialutilityinancient,degraded,andnon‐invasivelycollectedsamples.Inourstudywedesignedahigh‐throughputassay(calledPumaPlex)tosimultaneouslygenotype26SNPsinmountainlions(Pumaconcolor).Todate,wehavegenotypedmorethan700mountainlions,including~500individualsfromArizona.OurresultsfromusingPumaPlexproducedcomparableresultstothatofmicrosatellites,withasubstantialdecreaseinoverallcostsandturnaroundtime.Additionally,wedirectlycomparedgenotypingsuccessofPumaPlexwithapanelof12well‐knownFeliscatus(FCA)microsatellitelociin46mountainlionscatsamples.WefoundthatmeasuresofgenotypingsuccessweresignificantlyimprovedforPumaPlexrelativetomicrosatellites.TheadvantagesofPumaPlexcomparedwithtraditionalmicrosatellitegenotypingmakeitavaluableadditiontoexistingmethodstoassistgeneticmonitoringandmanagementofmountainlionsthroughouttheirrange.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
87
Inthelion’sfootsteps:MonitoringMountainlionusinganon‐invasiveandcost‐effectivefootprintidentificationtechnique
ZoeCJewell,Visitingresearchscientist,NicholasSchooloftheEnvironment,DukeUniversity;zoejewell228@gmail.com
SkyKAlibhai,Visitingresearchscientist,NicholasSchooloftheEnvironment,DukeUniversity;zoesky@wildtrack.org
JonahW.Evans,Mammalogist,TexasParksandWildlife;jonah.evans@tpwd.texas.gov
Abstract:Mountainlionsaresolitary,elusiveandcoververylargeareas,andasaresult,itisverydifficulttocollectreliabledataonpopulationcharacteristics(parameters)anddistribution.Whiletelemetryand/orcamera‐trappingtechniquescanprovideusefulinformation,theyarerelativelyexpensiveanddifficulttodeployoverlargeareas.Also,ifmonitoringdataaretobereliableandreflectthetruepopulationdynamicsthenthemethodofcollectionmusthaveminimalornoimpactonnaturalbehaviororphysiologyofthetargetanimal.Theauthorsdevelopedafootprintidentificationtechnique(FIT),initiallyforusewithblackandwhiterhinoinsouthernAfrica,andhavesinceadapteditforusewithfelidsincludingBengalandAmurtiger,Africanlionandcheetah.Digitalimagesofmultipleleft‐hindfootprintsfromindividualanimalsarecapturedusingabasicdigitalcamera.TheyareuploadedtoanFITadd‐inforJMPdatavisualizationsoftwarefromSASInstitute.Featureextractionallows>120measurementsoflength,angleandareatobecollected.Usingacustomizedcross‐validatedpairwisediscriminantanalysiswithWard’sclusteringtechnique,thefootprintscanbeclassifiedbyindividual,sex,age‐class,andspecieswithahighdegreeofaccuracy.JewellandAlibhaihavecollaboratedwithJonahEvans,MammalogistforTexasParksandWildlife,toadaptFITforuseinmonitoringfree‐rangingmountainlionpopulations.Theyhavecollected535footprintsfrom35captive(16:19)animalsofknownsexandidentitytoformtheinitialreferencedatabase.Accuraciesof>90%havebeenobtainedinclassifyingbyindividualandsex.FITisinexpensive,non‐invasive,andprovideshighaccuracywhencomparedwithothermethods.Thistoolcouldpotentiallybeusedtoestimatemountainlionpopulationsatdramaticallyreducedcostsinareaswithsuitablesubstrate.Theauthorswillinvitethosewithaccesstofree‐rangingmountainliontrackstojointhiseffortbycontributingfootprintsforfieldvalidationtrials
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
88
UseofcameratrapstoassesspreyavailabilityanddistributionrelativetomountainlionpredationintheDavisMountains,Texas
CatherineC.Dennison,BorderlandsResearchInstitute,SulRossStateUniversity;cden5410@sulross.edu
DanaMilani,BorderlandsResearchInstitute,SulRossStateUniversity
RonThompson,BorderlandsResearchInstitute,SulRossStateUniversity
BertGeary,BorderlandsResearchInstitute,SulRossStateUniversity
PatriciaMoodyHarveson,BorderlandsResearchInstitute,SulRossStateUniversity
LouisA.Harveson,BorderlandsResearchInstitute,SulRossStateUniversity
Abstract:WeusedanarrayofcameratrapsandinformationcollectedfromGPScollaredanimalstotesttherelationshipbetweenpreyavailabilityandmountainlionpredationintheDavisMountainsofwestTexas.Cameratrapswereusedtoestimatetherelativeabundanceanddistributionofmountainlionsandtheirprey.GPScollardatawasusedtoidentifylikelykillsitesandfieldinvestigationsconfirmedwhetherornotakillwaspresent,aswellasthespeciesthatwaskilled.Wecomparedpreyavailabilityacrossthestudysitetothecompositionofallkillsitesobserved.Cameratrapdatawasusedtoinvestigatethedistributionofprey,includinghabitatpreferencesforseveralcategoriesincludingelevation,terrainruggedness,andecologicalsite.Wealsolookedatindividualkillsitesandcomparedthosetotherelativepreyabundancebasedoncameratrapdatainthemoreimmediateareasurroundingthekill.Whileferalhogswerethemostabundantpreyspeciesoncameratraps(composing23%oftotalanimalsobserved)theywerethefourthmostcommonspeciespreyeduponbymountainlionsaftermuledeer,elk,andwhite‐taileddeer.Weobservedsignificantdifferencesbetweenthedietsofthemaleandfemalecatspresentonthestudysite,aswellasdifferencesindietbasedontheageoftheanimal.However,wealsonotedvariationinthedietpreferencesofindividualmountainlionsthatfallwithinthesamesexandagegroups.Abetterunderstandingofhowlocalpreyavailabilitybothonafineandbroadscaleaffectsmountainlionpredationwillhelplandmanagerstobettermanageforbothmountainlionsandtheirprey.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
89
Session11:
ManagementStrategies
Proceedingsofthe
11thMountainLionWorkshopIntegratingScientificFindingsintoManagement
TechniquesusedtoraiseorphanedFloridapanthersforreleasetothewild.PresentedbyMarkLotz
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
90
Conservationofpumas(Pumaconcolor)inarapidlyurbanizinglandscape;researchinformingtheneedformoreaction
T.WinstonVickers,WildlifeHealthCenter,UniversityofCalifornia,Davis;twvickers@ucdavis.edu
JessicaN.Sanchez,WildlifeHealthCenter,UniversityofCalifornia,Davis;jnsanchez@ucdavis.edu
ChristineK.Johnson,WildlifeHealthCenter,UniversityofCalifornia,Davis;ckjohnson@ucdavis.edu
RandyBotta,CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife;randy.botta@wildlife.ca.gov
PatrickR.Huber,InformationCenterfortheEnvironment,UniversityofCalifornia,Davis;prhuber@ucdavis.edu
ScottA.Morrison,TheNatureConservancy;smorrison@tnc.org
BrianCohen,TheNatureConservancy;USAbcohen@tnc.org
WalterM.Boyce,SchoolofVeterinaryMedicine,UniversityofCalifornia,Davis;wmboyce@ucdavis.edu
Abstract:Wide‐ranginglargecarnivoressuchaspumasposemyriadchallengesforconservation,perhapsespeciallyinurbanizinglandscapes.Weconducteda12‐yearstudyofpumas(Pumaconcolor)insouthwesternCalifornia,USA,anareathatisthefocusofmultiplelandscape‐scaleconservationplanningeffortsaimedatprotectinganetworkofhabitatreservesamidstextensiveurban,suburbanandexurbandevelopment.Themajorityofurban(74%)andrural(79%)residentsinthisregionagreedthatpumasareasignofahealthyenvironment,and>60%saidpumashavearighttoexistwherevertheyoccur.However,despiteprotectionfromrecreationalhunting,annualsurvivalwassimilartoheavilyhuntedpopulations,andhumanactivities,especiallyvehiclecollisionsanddepredationpermits,weretheleadingcausesofdeath.Ouranalysesshowedthatdespitelandscape‐scaleconservationplanningthathasbeenvigorouslypursuedinthisregion,habitatfragmentationhasresultedindemographicisolationandgeneticrestrictionandthedefactocreationoftwopumapopulationsseparatedbyaninterstatehighway(I‐15).Dominantcausesofdeathvariedsignificantlybetweenthetwopopulations,andbygender,withvehiclescausingoverhalfofmortalitieswestofI‐15intheSantaAnaMountains.Ourdatahighlighttheimportanceandurgencyofprotectingandrestoringwildlifecorridorsifpumapopulationsaretobeviableinfragmentinglandscapes.Wediscussapplicationsofourdatatoeffortstoreducehuman‐causedmortalityofpuma,includingcorridorplanning,highwayimprovements,andpublicoutreach.Withouttheseexpensivesolutions,intensivemanagementoftheSantaAnaMountainpopulationmaybenecessary,possiblyinperpetuity.Wepredictthatpositivehumanattitudestowardpumasinthisregionwillhavetobecombinedwithconcertedeffortsbyconservationandgovernmentalorganizationsinordertoavoidthisoutcome.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
91
Predation‐specificresourceselectionbycougarsinthePryorMountainsofWyomingandMontana
LinseyW.Blake,DepartmentofWildlandResources,UtahStateUniversity;linsey.blake@aggiemail.usu.edu
EricM.Gese,U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture,WildlifeServices;eric.gese@usu.edu.
Abstract:Cougarsareanambushpredatorwhoselandscapeselectionandpredationpatternsintertwine.Wherefeasible,modificationoflandscapefeaturescouldmanipulatepredationrisk.Ourobjectivewastoexaminepredation‐specificresourceselectionattwodifferentscales(fineandcoarse)inthePryorMountainsofWyomingandMontana.Wevisitedclusters(n=388)ofGPSlocationsfrom5radio‐collaredcougarsduring2011–2012tolocatepreyremains.Itisoftenimpossibletoidentifyspecifickilllocations,somanystudieshavereliedonthecharacteristicsofcachesitestodescribekillsitecharacteristics,likelyresultinginsomeinaccuracies.Toavoidthis,whenpossiblewebacktrackedfromcachelocationstokillpointsandusedafine‐scaleanalysistoexaminelandscapecharacteristicswithin25moftheseconfirmedkillpoints(n=30).Atthisscale,killsiteshadlowerhorizontalvisibilityandelevationsthanrandomsites,andweremoreapttobeinjuniper‐mountainmahoganyvegetationandlesslikelytobeingrasslands.Forourcoarsescaleanalysisofpredationriskweusedourentiredatasetofkills(n=195)byusingthe95%uppercut‐offpointoftheknowndistances‐dragged(94.9m)tobuffercachessites,therebycreatingriskzoneswhichhadahighlikelihoodofcontainingthekill.Wemodeledcougarpredationsiteselectionbyconstructingresourceselectionfunctionsfortheseriskzones.Thetopmodelforsummerriskzonesconsistedofvegetationclass,distance‐to‐waterandaquadratictermforslope,whilethetopmodelforwinterriskzonesincludedvegetationclassandelevation.Localwildlifemanagerswhohaveaninterestinreducingpredationtobighornsheepwillbeabletointersectthepredationriskresourceselectionfunctionswithbighornsheephabitattoguidehabitatmodificationeffortsaimedatincreasinghorizontalvisibilitytoreducetheriskofcougarpredation.
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
92
TechniquesusedtoraiseorphanedFloridapanthersforreleasetothewild
MarkLotz,FloridaFishandWildlifeConservationCommission;Mark.Lotz@myfwc.com
KarenMeeks,WhiteOak;KarenZ@wogilman.com
Abstract:TheFloridapanther(Pumaconcolorcoryi)isanisolatedsubspeciesofpumawithabreedingpopulationrestrictedtoapproximately800,000hectaresinsouthernFlorida.Geneticrestorationeffortsinthemid‐1990’sincreasedheterozygosityandweresuccessfulathelpingthepopulationreboundto100‐160adults.Nevertheless,thecurrentsizeofthispopulationisinsufficienttoensureageneticallydiverse,self‐sustainingpopulationandindividualpanthersstillrepresentasignificantproportionofthegeneticstructureinthewild.TheFloridaFishandWildlifeConservationCommission,incooperationwithWhiteOak,hasraisedten(4M,6F)orphanedorinjureddependant‐agedkittensandreleasedthembacktothewildwheretheyhadanopportunitytoberecruitedintothebreedingpopulation.Femalerecruitmenthasbeenexcellentandmosthaveproducedlitters.Additionally,severalofthecaptiveraisedfemale’soffspringhavebeendocumentedtoproducelitters.Malerecruitmentresultshavebeenmixed.Wedescribecaptivehabitatconditions,feedingregimens,staff‐pantherinteractionprotocols,andpre‐releaseconsiderationsimplementedwhilepanthersarebeingheldcaptivethatappeartobecriticalforimprovingtheprobabilityofsuccessfulrecruitmentofindividualsbackintothewildpopulation.Investinginindividuals,especiallyinsmall,isolated,andendangeredpopulationshasgeneticconsequencesforconservation,management,andrecovery.Asotherstateagenciesdevelopalternatepoliciesfordealingwithorphanedpumas,theknowledgegainedinFloridamayassistinincreasingthelikelihoodofsuccessfulreleases.EffectsofRemedialSportHuntingonCougarComplaintsandLivestockDepredations
RobertB.Wielgus,LargeCarnivoreConservationLaboratory,SchoolofEnvironment,WashingtonStateUniversity;
KaylieA.Peebles,LargeCarnivoreConservationLaboratory,SchoolofEnvironment,WashingtonStateUniversity
BenjaminT.Maletzke,WashingtonDepartmentofFishandWildlife
MarkE.Swanson,SchoolofEnvironment,WashingtonStateUniversity
Abstract:Remedialsporthuntingofpredatorsisoftenusedtoreducepredatorpopulationsandassociatedcomplaintsandlivestockdepredations.Weassessedthe
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
93
effectsofremedialsporthuntingonreducingcougarcomplaintsandlivestockdepredationsinWashingtonfrom2005to2010(6years).Thenumberofcomplaints,livestockdepredations,cougarsharvested,estimatedcougarpopulations,humanpopulationandlivestockpopulationswerecalculatedforall39countiesand136GMUs(gamemanagementunits)inWashington.Thedatawasthenanalyzedusinganegativebinomialgeneralizedlinearmodeltotestfortheexpectednegativerelationshipbetweenthenumberofcomplaintsanddepredationsinthecurrentyearwiththenumberofcougarsharvestedthepreviousyear.Asexpected,wefoundthatcomplaintsanddepredationswerepositivelyassociatedwithhumanpopulation,livestockpopulation,andcougarpopulation.However,contrarytoexpectationswefoundthatcomplaintsanddepredationsweremoststronglyassociatedwithcougarsharvestedthepreviousyear.Theoddsofincreasedcomplaintsandlivestockdepredationsincreaseddramatically(36to240%)withincreasedcougarharvest.Wesuggestthatincreasedyoungmaleimmigration,socialdisruptionofcougarpopulations,andassociatedchangesinspaceusebycougars‐causedbyincreasedhuntingresultedintheincreasedcomplaintsandlivestockdepredations.Widespreadindiscriminatehuntingdoesnotappeartobeaneffectivepreventativeandremedialmethodforreducingpredatorcomplaintsandlivestockdepredations.Abundanceofpumas(Pumaconcolor)inthenorthernSierraMadreOccidental,Mexico:arewereadytohaveaharvestquota?
HeliCoronelArellano.UniversidadAutónomadeQuerétaro;heli.coronearellano@gmail.com
NalleliE.LaraDiaz.UniversidadAutónomadeQuerétaro;Nalleli.lara@yahoo.com.mx.
CarlosA.LopezGonzalez.UniversidadAutónomadeQuerétaro;Cats4mex@gmail.com.
Abstract:PumasinMexicoalthoughconsideragamespeciesaretreatedasvarmints.Thisnonglamorousstatusistheresultofpredatorcontrolcampaignsassociatedtolivestockdepredation.Nevertheless,thereisnoaccountingtothenumberofmountainlionskilledasthereisnodirectbenefittotheranchingcommunity.OurobjectivewastodeterminethenumberoflionspresentinthelandscapeofthenorthernSierraMadreOccidental(SMOcc)toprovidebaselineinformationtoassistmanagementagenciesintheregion.OurstudyareaisthenorthernSMOccincludingNWChihuahuaandNESonora.ThehabitatsincludeamosaicofSonoranDesert,grasslands,oakwoodlands,andChihuahuandesert.Weusedcameratrapstoassesstheabundanceoflionsindifferenthabitats.Pumaabundancerangefrom1to4ind/100km2witha1M:1Fsexratio,usingtheseresults,managementunitsshouldhaveaminimumsurfaceof1250to5000km2
(habitatdependent).Additionalvariablesinthisproposalshouldincorporatepreyabundance,livestockproductionandconservationstatusoftheland.Theranching
Proceedingsofthe11thMountainLionWorkshop
94
communityshouldfavorasustainablehuntingscenarioinsteadofthetraditionalpredatorcontrolbysupportingoutfitterguidesdedicatedtothisspecies.ResearchtoRegulation:CougarSocialBehaviorasaGuideforManagement
RichardA.Beausoleil,WashingtonDepartmentofFishandWildlife
GaryM.Koehler,WashingtonDepartmentofFishandWildlife
BenjaminT.Maletzke,WashingtonDepartmentofFishandWildlife
BrianN.Kertson,WashingtonDepartmentofFishandWildlife
RobertB.Wielgus,LargeCarnivoreConservationLab,WashingtonStateUniversity
Abstract:Cougar(Pumaconcolor)populationsareachallengetoestimatebecauseoflowdensitiesandthedifficultymarkingandmonitoringindividuals.Asaresult,theirmanagementisoftenbasedonimperfectdata.Currentstrategiesrelyonasource–sinkconcept,whichtendstoresultinspatiallyclumpedharvestwithinmanagementzonesthataretypicallyapproximately10,000km2.Agenciesoftenimplementquotaswithinthesezonesanddesignatemanagementobjectivestoreduceormaintaincougarpopulations.Weproposeanapproachforcougarmanagementfoundedontheirbehaviorandsocialorganization,designedtomaintainanolderagestructurethatshouldpromotepopulationstability.Toachievetheseobjectives,hunterharvestwouldbeadministeredwithinzonesapproximately1,000km2insizetodistributeharvestmoreevenlyacrossthelandscape.Wealsoproposereplacingtheterm'quota'with'harvestthreshold'becausequotasoftenconnoteaharvesttargetorgoalratherthanathresholdnottoexceed.InWashington,USA,wherethesource–sinkconceptisimplemented,researchshowsthathighharvestratesmaynotaccomplishtheintendedpopulationreductionobjectivesduetoimmigration,resultinginanalteredpopulationagestructureandsocialorganization.Werecommendaharveststrategybasedonapopulationgrowthrateof14%andaresidentadultdensityof1.7cougars/100km2thatrepresentprobableaveragevaluesforwesternpopulationsofcougars.Ourproposaloffersmanagersanopportunitytopreservebehavioralanddemographicattributesofcougarpopulations,providerecreationalharvest,andaccomplishavarietyofmanagementobjectives.Webelievethisscience‐basedapproachtocougarmanagementiseasytoimplement,incursfewifanyaddedcosts,satisfiesagencyandstakeholderinterests,assuresprofessionalcredibility,andmaybeappliedthroughouttheirrangeinwesternNorthAmerica.
Recommended