View
222
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
7/28/2019 Incorporated Legal Practice & Directors' Duties
1/6
derived from the LSBs power to conduct an
audit of the compliance of an ILP with theLPA
(s2.7.22).
While there is no stated LSB time limit
for submission of the self-assessment, three
months would be appropriate. Submission
within three months is the requirement of
the Office of the Legal Services Commissioner
(NSW) (OLSC) and the Legal Services
Commission (Queensland) (LSC).6
REQUIREMENT TO HAVE A LEGALPRACTITIONER DIRECTORAn ILP must have at least one legal practi-
tioner director in addition to any directors
who are not legal practitioners (s2.7.10LPA).A legal practitioner director is an Australian
legal practitioner who holds a practising cer-
tificate as a principal of a law practice and is
appointed to the position of a director (s2.7.2).
The CA defines directorasa person who is
appointed to the position of a director, or is
appointed to the position of alternate direc-
tor and is acting in that capacity, regardless
of the name that is given to their position.
Also, unless the contrary intention appears
a person who is not validly appointed as a
director is also regarded as a director if they
act in the position of a director or the direc-
tors of the company are accustomed to act inaccordance with the persons instructions or
is the fundamental obligation placed on an
ILP before it can engage in legal practice.
An ILP wishing to engage in legal practice
in another state must comply with the notifi-
cation requirements under each statesLegal
Professio n Act. Of note, aside from the statu-
tory implications of breaching s2.7.7(1), the
LPA is silent on the recovery of costs during
the period of breach. The equivalent Legal
Profession Acts in NSW, Queensland and WA
explicitly disallow recovery of any amount
for anything the corporation did in contra-
vention of the notification section and allow
the ILPs client to recover as a debt due any
costs paid during the period of breach.2 There
is no prohibition on a corporation providing
non-legal services before notification, but it
must not represent itself as engaging in legalpractice (s2.7.8).
After notification, the LSB requires com-
pletion and submission of the self-assessment
audit (self-assessment).3 The LSB requires
every corporation that engages in legal prac-
tice in Victoria to undertake an internal (or
self-assessment) audit of its compliance with
its obligations under Part 2.7 of the Act.4
Part A elicits information regarding the ILP
and details of all legal practitioner directors,
and all other directors and shareholders. Part
B is an internal self-assessed management
systems audit relating to the implementation
and maintenance of appropriate managementsystems (s2 .7.10(3)).5 The self-assessment is
T
he incorporation of a sole practitioner
or a law firminto an incorporated legalpractice (ILP) is becoming more preva-
lent in Victoria.1 While there is much to
be considered in the decision to incorporate,
the statutory and regulatory obligations are
sometimes not given prominence.
This article outlines the major statutory
and regulatory obligations placed on ILPs
and legal practitioner directors by theLegal
Professio n Act2004 (LPA), theLegal Profession
Regul ation s 2005 (LPR), the Legal Services
Board (LSB), and the Corporations Act2001
(Cth) (CA).
WHAT IS AN ILP?An ILP is a corporation (s57A CA) that
engages in legal practice in the jurisdiction
of Victoria, whether or not it also provides
non-legal services to clients (s2.7.4(1)LPA).
Legal services are defined as work done, or
business transacted, in the ordinary course
of legal practice (s1.2.1LPA).
ILP NOTIFICATION OBLIGATIONSAfter meeting the CA and ASIC obliga-
tions regarding incorporation, the ILP must
notify the LSB in writing on the approved
form before it starts to engage in legal prac-tice in Victoria (s2.7.7(1)LPA). Notification
The legal and professional obligations of law firms that incorporate can be complex andpotential conflicts between them and directors duties need to be watched. By Patrick Oliver
INCORPORATION
PROCEED WITH CAUTION
42 L I J A U G U S T 2 0 1 1
LEGAL PRACTICE
ILLUSTRATION SHANE McGOWAN
7/28/2019 Incorporated Legal Practice & Directors' Duties
2/6
43L I J A U G U S T 2 0 1 1
7/28/2019 Incorporated Legal Practice & Directors' Duties
3/6
Duty to act in good faith in the bestinterests of the company and toexercise powers for a proper purpose
Directors are under fiduciary duties to act ingood faith and in the best interests of the cor-poration and to exercise their powers for aproper purpose, not for the purpose of gain-ing an personal advantage (s181(1) and (2) CA).These duties are of importance to an ILP. Forinstance, if a legal practitioner director wasconsidering leaving the ILP to set up a rivalfirm and was taking clients, would that direc-tor breach the duties to act in good faith and
in the best interests of the ILP?
Duty to avoid undisclosedconflicts of interest
Directors are under fiduciary duties not tomake undisclosed personal profit from theirposition as a director (ss182 and 183 CA). Thestatutory duties extend to employees as well
as directors and officers.
CONFLICT BETWEEN LEGALPROFESSIONAL OBLIGATIONS ANDDIRECTORS FIDUCIARY DUTIESThere is an inherent conflict between cer-tain directors fiduciary duties and those ofa legal practitioner under their professional
obligations. Tension arises between a legalpractitioners professional duty to act in thebest interest of their client coupled with theiroverarching duty to the court on one handand their duty as a director to act in the bestinterest of the company (i.e. the shareholders)on the other. Common examples include:t Settling litig ation pre-trial may be in the
best interests of the client and the admin-istration of justice, but not in the bestinterests of an ILP, as a corporation, whichmay stand to generate more fees if the liti-gation process is prolonged.
t Pro bono legal services are certainly inthe best interests of the community andthe administration of justice, but as theydo not generate revenue may not be in thebest interests of the ILP as a corporation.The legal practitioners duties to the court,
the administration of justice and their clientstake precedence over a directors general fidu-ciary duties. Safeguards have been placed intheLPA to ensure that this hierarchy of obli-gations is maintained. In respect of conflictsof interest in general theLPA states that forthe purpose of any law (including the com-mon law) or legal professional rules relatingto conflicts of interest to the conduct of a
legal practitioner who is a legal practitioner
director or an officer or employee then theinterests of the ILP are also taken to be those
t taking all reasonable action available to
deal with any unsatisfactory professional
conduct or professional misconduct of an
employed legal practitioner (s2.7.11(2));
t ensuring that the ILP complies with its dis-
closure obligations (s2.7.15);
t ensuring that a disqualified person (s1.2.1)
is not a director, officer or employee or
shares receipts from the provision legal
services (s2.7.21); and
t not exerting undue influence or causing
or inducing a legal practitioner director or
another legal practitioner who provides
legal services on behalf of the ILP to contra-
vene theLPA, theLPR, the legal profession
rules, or the professional obligations of a
legal practitioner (s2.7.35).
LEGAL PRACTITIONER
DIRECTORS DUTIES AT COMMONLAW AND UNDER THECAThe common law and the CA impose fidu-
ciary duties on the directors and officers of
a corporation. These fiduciary duties apply
to all direc tors of an ILP, so are in addition
to legal practitioner directorsLPA obliga-
tions. The CA fiduciary duties (ss180-183
CA) do not replace the common law fiduciary
duties; rather they replicate, and in some cir-
cumstances extend, those duties.
Duty to exercise reasonable
care, skill and diligence
Directors are under fiduciary duties to exer-
cise their powers and undertake their duties
with a reasonable degree of care and diligence
(s180 CA). Under the tort of negligence, and
the equitable duty of care, directors must
exercise a reasonable degree of care and
diligence in exercising their powers and dis-
charging their duties. The statutory duty
of care and diligence imposes an objective
standard of reasonableness on directors
(s180(1) CA). Section 180(1) is subject to thebusiness judgment rule defence (s180(2) CA).
wishes [shadow dire ctor] (s9 CA). Under the
LPA definition of a legal practitioner director
it would appear that a legal practitioner who
does not hold a principal practising cert ifi-
cate may be appointed a director of the ILP
but will not be a legal practitioner director.
OBLIGATIONS OF A LEGALPRACTITIONER DIRECTORUNDER THE LPAIn addition to directors duties in general and
the professional obligations of a legal practi-
tioner,7 every legal practitioner director has
specific obligations under theLPA,namely:
t responsibility for management of the legal
services provided by the ILP (s2.7.10(2));
t ensuring that appropriate management
systems are implemented and maintained
to enable the provision of legal services in
accordance with professional obligations(s2.7.10(3)(a));
t ensuring that the conduct of non-legal
practitioner directors and other officers
or employees does not affect the conduct
of those who are legal practitioners
(s2.7.10(3)(b));
t if it is reasonably apparent that the provi-
sion of legal services by the ILP will result
in breaches of the professional obligations
by officers and employees who are legal
practitioners, taking all reasonable action
available to ensure that the breaches do not
occur (s2.7.10(4)(a));
t taking appropriate remedial action in
respect of breaches of professional obliga-tions that do occur (s2.7.10(4)(b));
t taking reasonable steps to ensure that theconduct of employed legal practitioners
does not constitute unsatisfactory profes-sional conduct or professional misconduct
(ss2.7.11(1)(a) & 2.7.11(1A)(a));t taking reasonable steps to ensure that the
conduct of non-legal practitioner directors
does not adversely affect the provision of
legal services by the ILP (ss2.7.11(1)(b) and
2.7.11(1A)(b));
t taking reasonable steps to ensure that
non-legal practitioner directors are not
unsuitable to be a directors of the ILP(ss2.7.11(1)(c) and 2.7.11(1A)(c));
44 L I J A U G U S T 2 0 1 1
LEGAL PRACTICE
There is an inherent conflict between certain
directors fiduciary duties and those of a legalpractitioner under their professional obligations.
7/28/2019 Incorporated Legal Practice & Directors' Duties
4/6
of courts and regulatory authorities suchas the Legal Services Board etc.;
t Supervision of practice and staff: providing
for compliance with statutory obligationscovering licence and practising certifi-cate conditions, employment of personsand ensuring proper quality assuranceof work outputs and performance of legal,paralegal and non-legal staff involved inthe delivery of legal services; and
t Trust money and trust accounts: avoidingfailure to account and breaches of Chapter3, Part 3.3 of theLPA.The self-assessment helps by outlining
key concepts to consider when address-ing [the relevant] Objective and providesexamples of possible evidence or systemsmost likely to lead to compliance.10 The TenObjectives are principle-based and flexible,not prescriptive. As each ILP is unique it isfor the legal practitioner direc tor(s) to design,implement and maintain managementsystems appropriate to that ILP. The self-assessment states that all examples provided. . . are suggestions only because ILPs varyin terms of size, work practices and natureof operations and thus no one size fits all.11 Failure by the legal practitioner director(s)to implement and maintain appropriate
of the practitioner (s2.7.14). Furthermore, theprovision of pro bono legal services isexpressly allowed (s2.7.13(4)).
Legal practitioner directors should have anawareness of their general directors fiduciaryduties, their obligations as legal practitionerdirectors under theLPA and professional obli-
gations, and how those duties interact. 8
APPROPRIATE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMSEach legal practitioner director has anobligation to ensure that appropriate man-agement systems are implemented andmaintained to enable the ILP to providelegal services in accordance with over-all professional obligations (s2.7.10(3)(a)).Appropriate management systems arenot defined in theLPA but manifest them-selves as the Ten Objectives of AppropriateManagement Systems (Ten Objectives).9The Ten Objectives are based on profes-sional conduct rules and were drawn up bythe OLSC in conjunction with the College ofLaw and LawCover (NSW PI insurer). TheTen Objectives, which have been adopted bythe LSB with minor amendments to reflecttheLPAand the VictorianProfessional Conductand Practice Rules 2005, are:
t Negligence: competent work practices toavoid negligence;
t Communication: effective, timely and
courteous communication;t Delay: timely delivery, review and follow-
up of legal services to avoid delay;t Liens and file transfers: acceptable pro-
cesses for liens and file transfers;t Costs disclosure, billing practices and ter-
mination of engagement: providing fora shared understanding and appropri-ate documentation from commencementthrough to termination of the engagementcovering cost disclosure, billing practicesand termination of retainer;
t Conflicts of interest: timely identificationand resolution of the many different incar-nations of conflict of interest;
t Records management: minimising thelikelihood of loss or destruction of cor-respondence and documents throughappropriate document retention, filing,archiving etc and providing for compliancewith requirements as regards registers offiles, safe custody, financial interests;
t Undertakings: providing for undertakingsto be given, monitoring of compliance andtimely compliance with notices, orders,rulings, directions or other requirements
45L I J A U G U S T 2 0 1 1
LEGAL PRACTICE
&RQWDFWXVWRGD\IRUDQREOLJDWLRQIUHHGHPRQVWUDWLRQVDOHV#OHPDQFRPDXZZZOHPDQFRPDX
Australias only complete archivingVROXWLRQGHVLJQHGH[FOXVLYHO\IRUODZUPV
7/28/2019 Incorporated Legal Practice & Directors' Duties
5/6
LEGAL SERVICES BOARDS
POWER TO AUDIT ILPSThe LSB may conduct an audit of an ILPs:t compliance with the obligations contained
in Part 2.7 of theLPA, theLPR and the Legal
Profession Rules as they relate to ILPs
(s2.7.22(1)(a)); and
t management of the provision of legal ser-
vices (including the supervision of officers
and employees providing the services)
(s2.7.22(1)(b)).
An audit may be carried out whether or not
a complaint has been made (s2.7.22(2).
The rationale behind the compliance audit
is to ensure that an ILP has systematically
identified its statutory and regulatory obli-gations, complies with them, and monitors
its compliance. To show compliance with
s2.7.22(1)(a) it might be prudent for an ILP to
have an obligations register outlining all the
obligations under Part 2.7 etc.
In relation to s2.7.22(1)(b), as the imple-
mentation and maintenance of appropriate
management systems is mentioned in the
note to s2.7.22(1), an assumption can be made
this will be within the audit scope, as will the
management systems may amount to unsat-
isfactory professional conduct or professional
misconduct (s4.4.4(a)).
The Queensland Legal Services Commis-
sioner believes management systems . . .
count as appropriate only if they support
and encourage and g uide the firms employ-
ees to do the right thing and discourage anddeter them from doing the wrong thing.12
The NSW Legal Services Commissioner
agrees, stating that . . . by requiring incorpo-
rated legal practices to implement an ethical
infrastructure: that is, formal and informal
management policies, procedures controls,
work team cultures and habits of interac-
tion and practice that support, encourages
ethical behaviour through ethical infrastruc-
tures. [This] provides better protection for
consumers of legal services. This is because
the management systems we require ILPs
to maintain act as a quasi-educative mech-
anism teaching practitioners best practice
to achieve compliance with the require-
ments of the legislation and promote cultural
change.13 Parker et al suggest the legisla-
tive provisions that require incorporatedlegal practices to have appropriate manage-
ment systems [are] in effect a requirement
that incorporated legal practices consciously
implement an ethical infrastructure as a
part of their new business structure.14 The
self-assessment itself touches on ethical
infrastructure, stating the intent of these
provisions is to encourage ethical practice
within ILPs and to promote professional
standards, competence and honesty.15
46 L I J A U G U S T 2 0 1 1
LEGAL PRACTICE
Meeting the statutory and regulatory obligations
on the ILP and the legal practitioner directors isanother, albeit important, consideration in the
decision whether to incorporate.
Windows. Life without Walls. Dell recommends Windows 7.
Collect your coupon code www.powerbuy.com.au/dell
Save 20%^ on Dellselected Latitude laptopsDell Latitude laptops are ideal for businesses needing best-in-class performance, durability and design with
IT-friendly management solutions. Enter your coupon code at checkout to get your discount on a Dell
selected Latitude laptop. For expert guidance, help is just a click or call away.
^ Ofer ends 31st August 2011. Dell coupon terms and conditions apply. Visit www.powerbuy.com.au/dell.Copyright 2011 Dell Inc. All rights reserved.
Save big dollars on popular I.T. brands!
20%^MEMBER
DISCOUNTVisit www.powerbuy.com.au/dell to claim your discount
7/28/2019 Incorporated Legal Practice & Directors' Duties
6/6
7. Professional obligations of an Australian legal prac-titioner include: duties to the Supreme Court;obligations in connection with conflicts of interest;
duties to clients, including disclosure; and ethical rulesrequired to be observed by the practitioner (s2.7.2).8. Other Corporations Ac tobligations include: report-ing; record keeping; and accounting.9. Note 3 above, p6.10. Note 3 above, pp8-38.11. Note 3 above, p7.12. J Briton, Rethinking theregulation of lawyer con-duct: the centrality of law firm management andethical infrastructure, speech to Australian LegalPr a c t ic e M a n a ge me n t A s s o c ia t io n N a t io n a lConference, 15 August 2009, p10: www.lsc.qld.gov.au/speeches/ALPMA_National_Conference_Aug_09.pdf.(accessed 17 June 2011).13. S Mark, The future is here, Jo ur na l of th eProfessional Lawyer, American Bar Association, Centre forProfessional Responsibility, May 2009, pp45-63 at p46 .
14. C Parker et al, The Ethical Infrastructure of LegalPractice in Larger Law Firms: Values, policy and b ehav-
iour, (2008) 31(1) University of New South Wales LawJournal 158-188, p174.15. Note 3 above, p2.16. Supervision in this context means the supervisionof the overall ILP (governance) and/or the supervisionof matter files (professional supervision).17. Note 13 above, p15.18. An LSB representative in a conversation with theauthor on 1 September 2010.19. Legal Services Board,Annual Report 2009, p17 andtheAustralian Financial Review, 2 July 2010, p58.
supervision of officers and employees who
provide legal ser vices (s2.7.22(1)(b)).16Most audits are internal (self-assessment);
in fact every ILP should have completed theself-assessment. Records should be kept of
all self-assessments, any gap analysis under-
taken (internal or external), and the results
of any audits. With regard to external audits,
there is no public information on the LSBs
thinking as to their scope or frequency. It
is instructive to note that the LSC conducts
two types of external audit: web-based sur-
veys to test discrete aspects of an ILP s ethical
infrastructure; and comprehensive on-site
reviews.17 It is understood that the LSB is
likely to carry out audits in 2011-12.18
CONCLUSIONStatistics from the LSB suggest that most new
law practice registrations in Victoria (aside
from sole practitioners) are ILPs, as in New
South Wales and Queensland.19 The number
of law practices incorporating may increase
if agreement is reached between the repre-
sentative bodies (the LIV etc.) and the ATO
on certain taxation issues. The incentives to
incorporate may include: limited liability;
asset protection; share ownership; capital
raising; tax structuring; entry and exit of
directors; succession planning; and overall
management. The disincentives may include:taxation; disclosing financial information;
and potential payroll tax liabilities. Meeting
the statutory and regulatory obligations on
the ILP and the legal practitioner directors
is another, albeit important, consideration in
the decision whether to incorporate.
PATRICK (PADDY) OLIVER is a lawyer, management con-sultant and managing director of Lexcel Law PracticeConsultants. He has worked extensively with law firmclients in practice management, management systemsand risk management.
1. 761 ILPs are registered in Victoria: www.lsb.vic.gov.au/PractitionerStatistics.htm (accessed 22 June 2011).
2. See Legal Profession Act2008 (WA), ss102(5) and (6).Sections material in the WA matter ofHammond Legalin which an ILP in breach of s102(1) (failure to notify)was disallowed from recovering costs during the periodof breach: www.perthnow.com.au/business/news/h igh -p rof i l e - l awyer - john -hammond/story -e6frg2qu-1225796121613 (accessed 17 June 2011).3. Legal Services Board, Incorporated Legal Practices: Self-
Asse ssment A udit: www.lsb.vic.gov.au/documents/LSB_ILPSelfAssessmentAudit.pdf(accessed 17 June 2011).4. Note 3 above, p2.5. Note 3 above, p6.6. OLSC and LSC perform regulatory duties with regardto ILPs. LSC allows online self-assessment submission.
47L I J A U G U S T 2 0 1 1
LEGAL PRACTICE
$350 CASH BACK OFFER
A CALCULATEDMOVE.
AS A BONUS, YOUR POWERBUY MEMBERSHIP GIVES
YOU GREAT REBATES. LOG ON NOW, RECEIVE $100
CASH BACK AND WATCH YOUR BUSINESS GROW.
POWERBUY.COM.AU/LENOVO
The
EARN $250 ON A VIRTUAL VISA CARD,FULL DETAILS AT
LENOVO.COM.AU/MONEY
L]jekYf\;gf\alagfk2Nakalooo&hgo]jZmq&[ge&Ym'd]fgng^gjegj]\]lYadk&G^^]j]phaj]kgf+)kl9m_mkl$*())Yf\akgfdqYnYadYZd]gfk]d][l]\hjg\m[lk&9ddhjg\m[lkYf\g^^]jkYj]kmZb][llgYnYadYZadalq&D]fgngj]k]jn]kl`]ja_`llgYdl]jhjg\m[lg^^]jaf_kYf\kh][a[YlagfkYlYfqlae]$oal`gmlfgla[]&9ddaeY_]kYj]^gjaddmkljYlagfhmjhgk]kgfdq&>gj^mddD]fgnghjg\m[l$k]jna[]Yf\oYjjYflqkh][a[Ylagfknakalooo&d]fgng&[ge&YmD]fgngeYc]kfgj]hj]k]flYlagfkgjoYjjYfla]kj]_Yj\af_l`aj\%hYjlqhjg\m[lkgjk]jna[]k&LjY\]eYjck2L`]^gddgoaf_Yj]j]_akl]j]\ljY\]eYjckg^D]fgng2D]fgng$l`]D]fgngdg_gYf\L`afcHY\&Ea[jgkg^lYf\Oaf\gokYj]ljY\]eYjckg^Ea[jgkg^l;gjhgjYlagfafl`]M&K&gjgl`]j[gmflja]k&Afl]d$l`]Afl]ddg_g$Afl]dAfka\]$Afl]d;gj]Yf\;gj]Afka\]Yj]ljY\]eYjckg^Afl]d;gjhgjYlagfafl`]M&K&gjgl`]j[gmflja]k&Gl`]j[gehYfq$hjg\m[lYf\k]jna[]fYe]keYqZ]ljY\]eYjckgjk]jna[]eYjckg^gl`]jk&*())D]fgng&9ddja_`lkj]k]jn]\&Nakalooo&d]fgng&[ge'kY^][gehmlaf_h]jag\a[Yddq^gjl`]dYl]klaf^gjeYlagfgfkY^]Yf\]^^][lan][gehmlaf_&
Lenovo recommends Windows 7 Professional.
ThinkPad T420s(41715AM)Performance & connectivity ina thin & light package
U }iiixx *Vi-x
U ii7` 7 Professional 64bitU {,-{
U >`i-
Lenovo ThinkPad/{-{x*ii`L`}ii Corexx*Vi
T(4Pe
t
U
U
U
U
BONUS
Save big dollars on popular I.T. brands!
&9ddgjck
$350*MEMBERREBATEVisit www.powerbuy.com.au/lenovo to claim your $350 member rebate*
* Available to Australian Business Number (ABN) holders only. This offer entitles you to a rebate, on top of the best price you can negotiate, providingthe eligible item is purchased new and from an authorised Australian supplier. The cash-back rebate is paid as a percentage of your purchase price,excluding GST. Offer expires 31st August 2011 and is only available on selected products. See www.powerbuy.com.au for more details.
Recommended