Lidar vs. test bench for measurement of drift as affected ... · Unidad de Mecanización Agraria...

Unidad de Mecanización Agrariahttp://uma.deab.upc.eduUnidad de Mecanización Agraria

Lidar vs. test bench for measurement of drift as affected by sprayer type, air flow, nozzle type and density of vine canopy

Javier Campos1, Emilio Gil1, Montserrat Gallart1, Jordi Llorens2, Ramón Salcedo1, Jordi Llop1

1 Department of Agro Food Engineering and Biotechnology Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya2 Department of Agricultural and Forest Engineering, Research Group in AgroICT and Precision Agriculture, University of Lleida

14th Workshop on Spray Application Techniques in Fruit Growing – Hasselt (Belgium) May 2017

Objectives

Layout of the experiment and spray settings

Canopy characterization

Results

Conclusions

Objectives

Results

Conclusions

Determine the effect of nozzle type and air assistance on PPP lossestrough the last row during a vineyard spray application

Evaluate the effect of canopy characteristics on drift reduction dependingof different sprayer’s settings

Evaluate the potential use of LiDAR for estimating drift traversing thecanopy

Objectives

Results

Conclusions

Assays were conducted in two consecutive years Growth stage BBCH 85(late July) with maximum canopy development Two different sprayers were used Different spray adjustments were selected, combining nozzle type and air assistance

III III

Low air assistance High air assistance

SprayerAir flow

Nozzle type (n°) Pressure (bar)

Droplet size(1)

Application rate

m∙s−1 m3∙h−1 L∙min−1(2) L∙ha−1

Year 1

Master 2000 24.427,507 ATR yellow (10) 8.0 VF 0.92 369

27,507 TVI 80015 (10) 8.0 C 0.98 393

Master 2000 31.134,959 ATR yellow (10) 8.0 VF 0.92 369

34,959 TVI 80015 (10) 8.0 C 0.98 393Iris‐2 14.6 6,423 ATR orange (16) 8.0 VF 1.24 398

Year 2Master 2000 24.4 27,507 ATR yellow (10) 9.0 VF 0.97 413

27,507 TVI 80015 (10) 8.0 C 0.98 418Master 2000 31.1 34,959 ATR yellow (10) 9.0 VF 0.97 413

34,959 TVI 80015 (10) 8.0 C 0.98 418

Iris‐2 15.1 7,804 ATR yellow (20) 9.0 VF 0.97 4137,804 TVI 80015 (20) 8.0 C 0.98 418

Iris‐2 17.5 9,292 ATR yellow (20) 9.0 VF 0.97 4139,202 TVI 80015 (20) 8.0 C 0.98 418

Sprayer settings during the field trials

(1) According to BCPC classification (Doble et al. 1985)(VF: Very Fine; C: Coarse); (2) Flow rate per single nozzle.

½ row distance1 x row distance2 x row distance

Year 1

Year 2

Deposition (on petri dishes)

Application rate factor

Normalized Deposition.

Air characterization

3D ultrasonic anemometerGill instruments, Hampshire, United Kingdom)

Sprayers settings – Air characterization

Objectives

Results

Conclusions

Electronic canopy characterizationLiDAR SICK MS 200

Electronic canopy characterizationLiDAR SICK LMS 200

Canopy characterization with LiDAR

Llorens, J., Gil, E., Llop, J., Queraltó, M. 2011. Georeferenced LiDAR 3D vine plantation map generation. Sensors, 11:6237-6256.

0,60,81

1,21,41,6

0250050007500

10 9,5 9 8,5 8 7,5 7 6,5 6 5,5 5 4,5 4 3,5 3 2,5 2 1,5 1 0,5

ROW DISTANCE (M)

Year 1

0250050007500

10 9,5 9 8,5 8 7,5 7 6,5 6 5,5 5 4,5 4 3,5 3 2,5 2 1,5 1 0,5

ROW DISTANCE (M)

Year 2

0250050007500

10 9,5 9 8,5 8 7,5 7 6,5 6 5,5 5 4,5 4 3,5 3 2,5 2 1,5 1 0,5

ROW DISTANCE (M)

Year 2

Objectives

Results

Conclusions

Year 1

A (3,2 m) B (6,4 m) V

A (3,2 m) B (5,7 m) V

Year 1

Deposition Test Bench and CROP (m2 vegetation/m)

A (3,2 m) B (6,4 m) V

Year 1

Year 2

A (1,6 m) B (3,2 m) V

Year 2

Year 2 A (1,6 m) B (3,2 m) V

A (1,6 m) B (3,2 m) V

Year 2

Air injectio

n –High

Air injectio

n –Low air

Conven

l –High

Air injection – Low air

Conventional – High air

Air injection – High air

a ab b b

a ab ab b

a a a a

b b a c

Gil, E., Llorens, J., Llop, J., Fàbregas, X., Gallart, M. 2013. Use of a terrestrial LIDAR sensor fordrift Detection in vineyard spraying. Sensors, 13: 516-534.

Objectives

Results

Conclusions

Conventional mistblower generates much more drift than multi‐row sprayer

Air injection nozzles increases the amount of deposit in the nearest area close to the last row (< 5 m)

Large air assistance with conventional nozzles enlarge the contaminated area

Air assistance, sprayer type and nozzle type have different effect of drift:sprayer type > air assistance > nozzle type

LiDAR allows to estimate/evaluate drift potential, but more research should be applied

It seems difficult to quantify the effect of canopy characteristics (density, leaf area…) on the amount of liquid exceeding the last row

Thank you very much

Lidar vs. test bench for measurement of drift as affected ... · Unidad de Mecanización Agraria...

Documents

MTFB12 | MTR60B | METB | MTO60B | MCTB12€¦ · Elliptical Bench Table METB Round Bench Table MTR60B Octagon Bench Table MTO60B Rectangular Bench Table MTFB12 Curve Bench Table MCTB12

Drift och underhåll Funktionsbeskrivning - Drift Teknik

Semantic drift

Electromechanical actuators affected by multiple failures: a ......realized and modeled a test-bench electromechanical actuator (EMA) to compare its real behavior with the predicted

Belt Drift

Model Curriculum...10 inch, Punch & Drift, Hand lever shearing machine, Different types of soldering iron, Mallet (Various types), Bench vice, File - rough, Second cut & Smooth, Paper

Continental Drift and Plate Tectonics - University of Iceland Geology pdf/5-Continental... · This tectonic cycle has influenced the distribution of organisms and greatly affected

Operator’s Manual POWER FEED 10M Single Bench · POWER FEED ® 10M Single Bench ... b. The operation of welding fume control equipment is affected ... heavy shirt, cuffless trousers,

Development of a Drift Chamber for Drift Velocity Monitoring in …web.physik.rwth-aachen.de/~hebbeker/theses/altenhoefer... · 2006-08-18 · Development of a Drift Chamber for Drift

Continental drift

Drift by drift: Effective population size is limited by ...oxbow.sr.unh.edu/preprints/WaresPringle_Jun1008BMC-EB.pdf · 1 drift by drift: effective population size is limited by advection

10.1 Continental Drift - Oak Park Independent · 10.1 Continental Drift 10.1 Continental Drift Wegener's Hypothesis Continental Drift ·proposed by Alfred Wegener in 1912 ·hypothesized

Sacred Drift

Application of Oceanographic Drift Models · Surface Drift Dynamics Tides River inflow Wind Waves Stokes Drift Environmental Forcing Ocean Response Drift Response Direct Windage

Mission Drift

Group Drift

SURINAME: BOUTERSE'S LEFTWARD DRIFT · Title: SURINAME: BOUTERSE'S LEFTWARD DRIFT Subject: SURINAME: BOUTERSE'S LEFTWARD DRIFT Keywords

Ba:r & Bench (,ench.com)Ba:r & Bench (,ench.com) . Ba:r & Bench (,ench.com) . Ba:r & Bench (,ench.com)

Pavati Marine Drift Boat Catalog - Drift Boats by Pavati

Genetic Drift