Mario Chiasson - - Innovative Learning Environments ... · skills within the workplace.In: Changing...

Characteristics of learning spaces favouring

the development of computational thinking skills

(Pilot Study)

Mario ChiassonPh D. student, Université de Moncton

mariochiassson.com

@marioch

“The educator’s job is not

to prepare kids to do well

in class, but to do well in

life.”

– E L L I O T E I S N E R

Fast-Moving

World

Digital Hardware

Digital Collaboration Digital Highway

Digital Information

ICT

Revolution

Globalization Information & Communication Technology

Revolution (ICT)

Society went from connected to hyper-connected

redefining the global economy

–Friedman (2005)

– Lorenz & al. (2015)

Because of ICT, the industry has transformed their process and culture

of productivity in order to perform globally (Lorenz & al, 2015)

New spaces nurturing communication, collaboration,

and problem solving (Levy & Murnane, 2004)

2.0

Electrical

Industry

3.0

Automated

Industry

4.0

Digital

Industry

Industry Evolution

Industry Industry

1.0

Steam

Industry

Industry

School System School System School System ?

Industry

– Lorenz & al. (2015); Toner (2011); Cobo (2013)

–Toner (2011); Cobo (2013); Shailaja & Sridaran (2015)

The mismatch between formal education and

the challenges of innovative society

• What process was redefined due

to ICT?

• Amongst 21st Century skills what

are the essential skills that the

industry is now requiring?

• How did the education system

transform their learning culture?

• Which processes of the education

system were transformed to

improve students’ performances

(3r+skills)?

In what ways the characteristics of the learning space influence the process of

the development of computational thinking skills of students?

How can the characteristics

of the learning space

influence the process of the

development of

computational thinking skills

of students?

learning space

process

computational thinking

Goals

1 - Observe student’s Computational Thinking Processes (CTP) in

using coding software - (Pilot Study)

2- Identify the characteristics of learning spaces favoring the

development of computational thinking (CT) skills.

What is

Computational

Thinking Skill?

As part of the 21st century skills, CT is the

increasingly essential.

Brennan & Resnick, (2012); Denning, (2009); Bundy, (2007);

Djambong & Freiman, (2016); Korucu, Gencturk & Gundogdu (2017) ; Magana, Marepalli & Clark, (2011)

Research Context(Pilot Study)

Observe student’s Computational Thinking Processes (CTP)

in using coding software

School Board in South East

New Brunswick, Canada

Methodology

• 60 grade 6 students from 2 middle schools

• Swift Playground and Scratch

• Middle School Technology Education (MSTE)

• Pre & Post Questionnaire - 22 items

• 5 Months

• Monthly Interviews & Observations

Findings

Based on the analysis of the corpus

Love Coding Challenges•

Perseverance• & Determination

“I am so excited when I have to solve problem

using Swift Playground (…) I just can’t stop!”

• MSTE space was flexible, adaptable and

engaging.

• Collaborate with each other using different

resources and free navigation through different

areas of the learning space

“I love (Teacher’s name) class because we are free

to move anything”

Perception

ResearchExecution

Feedback

Human

Technologies

Evaluate

Definition of the problem

Approaches

Concepts

Discuss

DigitalPhysical

Community School

Confirm

Internal knowledge

Share

Consult

ResourcesInquire

Decision

Validate

Consolidate

Resources

- +

Chiasson (2017)©️

Toward the model of the process of CT

Next Step

Identify the characteristics of learning spaces favoring the

development of computational thinking (CT) skills.

What is

Learning Space?

Learning Space

Adaptable EngagingDiversity Multifunctional Technology-Rich

Learning Styles

Digital

Physical

Multi-Intelligences

Inclusive

Collaborative

Mobility

Multiple Configurations

Multi-Functions

Teaching Strategies

Fluid TransitionsClass

School

Community

Connectivity

Accessibility

Physical

Intellectual

Social

Writable

Dynamic

Empowerment

Based on the literature survey

Devices

Devices

Space

Diversity EngageantMultifunctional Technology-RichAdaptable

Perception

ResearchExecution

Feedback

Human

Technologies

Evaluate

Definition of the problem

Approaches

Concepts

Discuss

DigitalPhysical

Community School

Confirm

Internal knowledge

Share

Consult

ResourcesInquire

Decision

Validate

Consolidate

Resources

- +

Chiasson (2017)©️

Toward the model of the process of CT

How can the characteristics of

the learning space influence the

process of the development of

computational thinking skills of

students?

Thank You!

Mario ChiassonPh D. student, Université de Moncton

mariochiassson.com

@marioch

Reference

Ambrosio, A.P., Almeid, L. S., Macedo, J. & Franco, A. (2014). Exploring Core Cognitive Skills of Computational

Thinking. Proceedings of PPIG, University of Sussex, Sussex, England. Retrieved from

http://www.ppig.org/sites/default/files/2014-PPIG-25th-Ambrosio.pdf

Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role

of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48-54.

Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E. R., & Sullivan, A. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration

of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education, 72, 145–157.

Branigan-Pipe, Z. (2016). 21st Century Learning, 20th Century Classroom. Association Education Canada, 56(3).

Retrieved from http://www.cea-ace.ca/education-canada/article/21st-century-learning-20th-century-classroom

Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of

computational thinking. Proceedings of the 2012 annual meeting of the American Educational Research

Association, Vancouver, Canada. Retrieved from http://scratched.gse.harvard.edu/ct/files/AERA2012.pdf

Buckley, S. (2012). The Role of Computational Thinking and Critical Thinking in Problem Solving in a Learning

Environment. Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Learning, 63-70. Retrieved from

http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=5&sid=902ae2ed-9cae-416b-9453-

562a7074f881%40sessionmgr104

Chiasson, M. & Frieman (2017). Closing the Gap: How Can the School System Embrace the Age of

Acceleration? Proceedings at EdMedia 2017, June, Washington, DC, United States, June 20-23.

Cobo, C. (2013). Skills for Innovation: Envisioning an Education That prepare for changing world. The Curriculum

Journal, 5(24), 1, 67-85.

Cox, A., Herrick, T., & Keating, P. (2012). Accommodations: Staff identity and university space. Teaching in

Higher Education, 17(6), 697–709.

Denning, P. (2009). The profession of IT- Beyond computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 52(6), 28-30.

Djambong, T., & Frieman, V. (2016). Task-base assessment of students’ computational thinking skills developed through visual programming or tangible coding environments. Presentation at The CELDA2016 International Conference, Manheim, Germany, October, 24-27.

Freiman, V., Godin, J., Larose, F., Léger, M., Chiasson, M., Volkananova, V., & Goulet, M.-J. (2016). Towards the Life-Long Continuum of Digital Competences: Exploring Combination of Soft-Skills and Digital Skills Development. Proceedings of the EDULEARN 2016 international conference, 4-7 July, Barcelona, Spain.

Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K-12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher,42(1), 38–43.

Gruskin, K., & Season, M. (2016). 21st-Century Learning Environments. College Planning and Management,19(2), 29-33. Retrieved from https://webcpm.com/articles/2016/02/01/learning-environments.aspx

Kersh, N., Waite, E., & Evans, K. (2012). The spatial dimensions of workplace learning: acquiring literacy and numeracy skills within the workplace. In: Changing spaces of Education. London. Routledge. 182–204.

Kersh, N. (2016). Rethinking the learning space at work and beyond: The achievement of agency across the boundaries of work-related spaces and environments. International Review of Education, 61(6), 835–851. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11159-015-9529-2/fulltext.html

Korucu, A. T, Gencturk, A. T & Gundogdu, M. M. (2017). Examination of the Computational Thinking Skills of Students. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 2(1), 11-19.

Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51-61.

Lorenz, M., Rüßmann, M., Strack, R., Lasse Lueth, K., & Bolle M. (2015). Man and Machine in Industry 4.0: How will Technology transform the Industrial Workforce Through 2025? The Boston Consultation Group. Retrieved from http://englishbulletin.adapt.it/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/BCG_Man_and_Machine_in_Industry_4_0_Sep_2015_tcm80-197250.pdf

Magana, A.J., Marepalli, P. & Clark, J.V. (2011). Work in Progress - Integrating Computational and Engineering Thinking through Online Design and Simulation of Multidisciplinary Systems. 41st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October, 12-15.

McPeck, J.E. (1981). Critical thinking and education. Martin Robinson. Oxford.

Miller, L.D., Soh, L.K., Chiriacescu, V., Ingraham, E., Shell, D. & Paterson Hazley, M. (2014). Integrating Computational and Creative Thinking to Improve Learning and Performance in CS1. Proceedings of SIGCSE’14, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM,49(3), 33–35.

Wing, J. M. (2011). Research notebook: Computational thinking—What and why? The link magazine of Carnegie Mellon University. Retrieved from http://www.cs.cmu.edu/link/research-notebook-computational-thinking-what-and-why

Zhong, B., Wang, Q., Chen, J., & Li, Y (2016). An Exploration of Three-Dimensional Integrated Assessment for Computational Thinking. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(4), 562-590.

Zufferey, C. & King, S. (2016). Social work learning spaces: the Social Work Studio. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(2), 395-408.