View
34
Download
1
Category
Tags:
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Module 5: Relationships. -- in bibliographic records and in authority records. Relationships: two parts. The entities being related Work, expression, manifestation, item, person, family, corporate body, etc. Identified by the authorized access point or identifier or description - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
RDA Seminar, University of Florence
1
Module 5:
Relationships
-- in bibliographic records and
in authority records
RDA Seminar, University of Florence
22
Relationships: two parts
• The entities being related– Work, expression, manifestation, item,
person, family, corporate body, etc.– Identified by the authorized access point or
identifier or description
• The type of relationship– Identified by a relationship designator
RDA Seminar, University of Florence
33
Relationships
created
Shakespeare Hamletwas created by
Pers
on W
or
k
RDA Seminar, University of Florence
44
RDA Seminar, University of Florence
55
Core relationships previously discussed
• The entity related to naming the work:– Creator (RDA 19.2)
• Two entities covered by naming the work or expression:– Work manifested (RDA 17.8)– Expression manifested (RDA 17.10)
RDA Seminar, University of Florence
66
Other entities in relationships
• Contributors (ch. 20)• Related works (ch. 25)• Related expressions (ch. 26)• Related manifestations (ch. 27)• Related items (ch. 28)• Related persons (ch. 30)• Related families (ch. 31)• Related corporate bodies (ch. 32)
RDA Seminar, University of Florence
77
Contributor (RDA 20.2)
• A person, family, or corporate body associated with an expression, e.g.,– Translators– Editors of compilations– Performers– Illustrators– Arrangers of music– Compilers
RDA Seminar, University of Florence
88
Relationship for contributors
• Give as authorized access point in MARC 7XX fields in bibliographic record
• Relationship designators from RDA appendix I in subfield $e of 7XX field– Not a closed list– Do not include $e in name authority record
RDA Seminar, University of Florence
99
Example: contributor
100 1# $a Wood, Audrey.245 14 $a The napping house / $c Audrey Wood ; illustrated by Don Wood.700 1# $a Wood, Don, $e illustrator.
Notes: 1) Relationship designator “author” could be given for creator in 100 field. 2) 2nd statement of responsibility is not core; also, it isn’t needed to justify the 700 field.
RDA Seminar, University of Florence
1010
Example: contributor
100 1# $a Lindgren, Astrid, $d 1907-2002, $e author.
240 10 $a Pippi Långstrump. $l English245 10 $a Pippi Longstocking / $c Astrid
Lindgren ; translated by Tiina Nunnally. 700 1# $a Nunnally, Tiina, $d 1952- $e
translator.
Notes: 1) Relationship designators “author” and “translator” could be given -- cataloger judgment. 2) 2nd statement of responsibility is not core; also, it isn’t needed to justify the 700 field.
Original Work - Same
Expression
Same Work – New Expression
New WorkCataloging Rules Cut-Off Point
DerivativeEquivalent Descriptive
Facsimile
Reprint
ExactReproduction
Copy
MicroformReproduction
Variations or Versions
Translation
Simultaneous“Publication”
Edition
Revision
SlightModification
ExpurgatedEdition
IllustratedEdition
AbridgedEdition
Arrangement
SummaryAbstractDigest
Change of Genre
Adaptation
DramatizationNovelizationScreenplay
Libretto
FreeTranslation
Same Style orThematic Content
Parody
Imitation
Review
Criticism
AnnotatedEdition
Casebook
Evaluation
Commentary
Family of Works
12
Relationships• Inherent among the
Group 1 entities
• Content relationships among works/expressions
• Structural relationships
Work
Expression
Manifestation
Item
Whole-Part
AccompanyingSequentialDerivative12
RDA Seminar, University of Florence
1313
Related work (RDA 25.1)
• Common work relationships:– Whole-part, e.g.,
• Works in a compilation• Chapters in a book
– Adaptations– Supplements– Sequential relationships (e.g., earlier and
later serials)
RDA Seminar, University of Florence
1414
Relationship: related work
• Three methods (RDA 24.4)– Identifier (not used alone in RDA Test)– Authorized access point– Description (structured or unstructured)
• Cataloger judgment to use relationship designators in RDA appendix J.2; MARC content designation indicates some relationships
RDA Seminar, University of Florence
1515
Whole-part relationships: LC policies for the Test
• No limit on number of works, unless burdensome, in MARC 505 contents note
• Cataloger’s judgment for number of MARC 7XX analytical authorized access points if that is the method used to give the relationship
• Don’t need to justify the 7XX analytical access points by a 505 field
RDA Seminar, University of Florence
1616
Whole-part work example
Authorized access points for the works:
100 1# $a Shakespeare, William, $d 1564-1616. 245 10 $a Hamlet ; $b King Lear / $c William
Shakespeare.*700 12 $a Shakespeare, William, $d 1564-1616.
$t Hamlet.*700 12 $a Shakespeare, William, $d 1564-1616.
$t King Lear.
* 2nd indicator in 700 indicates the relationship “Contains”
RDA Seminar, University of Florence
1717
Example: serial related worksStructured descriptions and three identifiers each:
245 00 $a TCA journal.785 00 $t Journal of professional counseling,
practice, theory, & research $x 1556- 6382 $w (DLC) 2005205756 $w (OCoLC) 55891574
245 00 $a Journal of professional counseling, practice, theory, & research.
780 00 $t TCA journal $x 1556-4223 $w (DLC) 93645762 $w (OCoLC) 26906768
785 indicators 00 = relationship “Continued by”780 indicators 00 = relationship “Continues”
RDA Seminar, University of Florence
1818
Related expression (RDA 26.1)
• Common expression relationships:– Whole-part (e.g., translations in a
compilation)– Revisions– Editions– Translations– Language editions– Abridgements
RDA Seminar, University of Florence
1919
Relationship: related expression
• Three methods (RDA 24.4)– Identifier (not used alone in US RDA Test)– Authorized access point– Description (structured or unstructured)
• Cataloger judgment to use relationship designators in RDA appendix J.3; MARC content designation gives some relationships
RDA Seminar, University of Florence
2020
Whole-part expression example
Authorized access points for the expressions:
100 1# $a Petterson, Per, $d 1952-245 10 $a Two Norwegian novels / $c Per
Petterson.700 12 $a Petterson, Per, $d 1952- $t Ut og
stjæle hester. $l English.700 12 $a Petterson, Per, $d 1952- $t Til
Sibir. $l English.
Could also include a contents note but not required to justify the access points; or, a contents note without the 700 fields would be possible: 505 0# $a Out stealing horses -- To Siberia.
RDA Seminar, University of Florence
2121
Example: serial related expression
Unstructured description for other language edition:
130 0# $a Revista de política y derecho ambientales en América Latina y el Caribe. $l English.
245 10 $a Journal of environmental policy and law in Latin America and the Caribbean.
580 ## $a Issued also in Spanish under title: Revista de política y derecho ambientales en América Latina y el Caribe.
RDA Seminar, University of Florence
2222
Related expression - translation (example 1)
Authorized access point:
100 1# $a Brown, Dan, $d 1964-240 10 $a Digital fortress. $l French245 10 $a Forteresse digitale.700 1# $i Translation of: $a Brown, Dan,
$d 1964- $t Digital fortress.
RDA Seminar, University of Florence
2323
Related expression - translation (example 2)
Structured description in 500 field:
100 1# $a Brown, Dan, $d 1964-240 10 $a Digital fortress. $l French245 10 $a Forteresse digitale.500 ## $a Translation of: Digital fortress /
Dan Brown. -- 1st ed. -- New York : St. Martin’s Press, 1998. -- 371 pages ; 22 cm.
RDA Seminar, University of Florence
2424
Related expression - translation (example 3)
Structured description in 765 field:
100 1# $a Brown, Dan, $d 1964- 240 10 $a Digital fortress. $l French 245 10 $a Forteresse digitale.*765 0# $a Brown, Dan, 1964- $t Digital
fortress $b 1st ed. $d New York : St. Martin’s Press, 1998. $h 371 pages ; 22 cm $w (DLC) 9703318
* 2nd indicator “blank” = “Translation of”
RDA Seminar, University of Florence
2525
Related expression - translation (example 4)
Unstructured description in 500 field:
100 1# $a Brown, Dan, $d 1964-240 10 $a Digital fortress. $l French245 10 $a Forteresse digitale.500 ## $a Translation of the author’s novel
Digital fortress.
RDA Seminar, University of Florence
2626
Related manifestation (RDA 27.1)• Common manifestation relationships:
– Reproductions– Different formats for same expression (e.g., book vs.
CD; book vs. PDF)– Special issues
• Two methods (RDA 24.4)– Identifier (not used alone in RDA Test)– Description (structured or unstructured)
• Cataloger judgment to use relationship designators in RDA appendix J. 4
RDA Seminar, University of Florence
2727
Related item (RDA 28.1)
• Common item relationships– Reproduction of a specific copy– “Bound with”– Item added to copy of manifestation in a special collection
• Two methods (RDA 24.4)– Identifier (not used alone in RDA Test)– Description (structured or unstructured)
• Cataloger judgment to use relationship designators in RDA appendix J.5
RDA Seminar, University of Florence
2828
Related persons, families, and/or corporate bodies
• Relationship recorded in authority record in 5XX field– Can also give relationship designator from RDA
appendix K in subfield $i to identify specific relationship
– Some relationships in MARC indicated by values in subfield $w (e.g., “a” and “b” for earlier and later corporate bodies) -- cataloger judgment or library policy to use in lieu of subfield $i
RDA Seminar, University of Florence
2929
Examples: person related to corporate body or family
100 1# $a Garr, Arnold K.510 2# $w r $i Employer: $a Brigham Young
University
100 1# $a Carroll, Charles N. $q (Charles Nagus), $d 1817-1902
500 3# $w r $i Descendants: $a Carroll (Family : $g Carroll, Charles N. (Charles Negus), 1817-1902)
RDA Seminar, University of Florence
3030
Examples: related corporate bodies
110 2# $a Library of Congress. $b Policy and Standards Division
510 2# $w r $i Predecessor: $a Library of Congress. $b Cataloging Policy and Support Office
110 2# $a Library of Congress. $b Cataloging Policy and Support Office
510 2# $w r $i Successor: $a Library of Congress. $b Policy and Standards Division
RDA Seminar, University of Florence
3131
Examples: related corporate bodies
Giving specific relationship in $w:
110 2# $a Library of Congress. $b Policy and Standards Division
510 2# $w a $a Library of Congress. $b Cataloging Policy and Support Office
110 2# $a Library of Congress. $b Cataloging Policy and Support Office
510 2# $w b $a Library of Congress. $b Policy and Standards Division
RDA Seminar, University of Florence
3232
Review
• “Relate”: second main task of RDA (first = identify)
• Relationships within and between FRBR Group 1 and Group 2 entities
• Relationship designators in appendices I, J, and K
• Questions?
Recommended