View
437
Download
3
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
–
Modular Object Oriented Dynamic learning
Environment
( moodle )
LMS
CMS
LCMS
E-Platform
•
Martin Dougiamas
•Moodle 1.0
•
moodle.com
•Moodle 1.9
•
Moodle 2.0
•
(
•
.
•
.
•
.
•
SCORM .
•
.
•
.
•
• Glossary •
.
• •
Linux
PHP, MySQL, Apache
windows, Mac OS
X, Netware, Solaris
.
.
Apache
PHP PHP
My SQl
Centre for Learning & Performance
Technologies
Leeds College of Technology
University of Glasgow
Royal Holloway university of London
Sheffield College
(University of Arizona )
University of Minnesota
University of Montana
University of Wyoming
Second Life + Moodle = Sloodle
Simulation Linked Object Oriented DynamicLearning Environment
Mobile + Moodle = MoMo
www.mobilemoodle.org
•
•
SmartWay)Moodle
•
•
•EPCS
•
•
•
.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6
.7
Moodle
-
•
•
Moodle
•
•
•
•
–
–
•
–
–
–
–
•
•
–
–Moodle
–
Transforming Moodle As
A Reflective
Tool In Learning French
LanguageNoorhayati Md Ali, Dr.
Jawakher Mior JaafarFacuilty of Language and
Linguistic, University of Malaya,
Kuala Lumpur ( MALAYSIA )
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Online Teaching and Learning in
Transition
Faculty Perspectivees on
moving from
Blackboard to the Moodle
Learning
Management System
By Brian Beatty and Connie
Ulasewicz
• Online teaching and learning has
been in transition for its entire
existance.
• The number of online courses has
grown rapidly.
• In San Francisco State
University, approximately 90% of their
faculty who use online technologies
use the Blackboard LMS and the rest
use a local inStallation of the open
resource Moodle LMS which SFSU
This article presents the selections
of 2 SFSU faculty using the Moodle
LMS for the first time:
1. Dr. Connie Ulasewicz ,this was the
first time using any online LMS to
support classroom teaching and
learning.
2. Dr.Brian Beaty , the new system was
a change from using tht
Blackboard LMS.
Connie’s experience :
• My pedagogical style is to create anopen and active participation indiscussions environment.
• My desire in useing an online toolwas to facilitate interaction ,connectand continue to dialog outside of theclassroom .
• Blackboard online discussions islimited and it was not interactive orcreative tool.
• I prefer Moodle for its screen ( userfriendly).
Brian’s experience :
In using Moodle for the fist
time, I had the opportunity to
compare my experiences with
Blackboard with Moodle
systems.
I will address four main issues of
comparison:
1. Interface ease of use : I prefer
Moodle .
2. Author control of posts: I prefer
Blackboard.
3. Difficulty sharing student work : I
prefer Blackboard .
4. Hoping for new features : I prefer
Moodle .
• Connie : Moodle is very much an
interactive tool for both student and
faculty.
• Brian : Information technology
, Instructional design and faculty
advisory committees must make the
decision integrity to switch from
commercial online tool to alternative
online tool.
Conclusion
•
•
•Moodle
•Ali, Noorhayati Md & Jaafar ,Jawakher Mior : Transforming Moodle As A
Reflective Tool In Learning French Language, University of Malaya, Kuala
Lumpur ( MALAYSIA ),
•Beatty , Brian & Ulasewicz , Connie : Online Teaching and Learning in
Transition Faculty Perspectivees on moving from Blackboard to the
Moodle
Learning Management System ,
Recommended