Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U

Notation for Arguments

Vertical Notation:S>TT>US>U

Sequent Notation for Arguments

Sequent Notation:S>T, T>U | S>U

Vertical Notation:S>TT>US>U

Sequent Notation for Arguments

Sequent Notation:S>T, T>U | S>U

Vertical Notation:S>TT>US>U

Translating Arguments

If the Bible is REVELATION then it will WITHSTANDattack. It does withstand attack. So it is revelation.

Translating Arguments

If the Bible is REVELATION then it will WITHSTANDattack. It does withstand attack. So it is revelation.

If R then W. W. So R.

Translating Arguments

If the Bible is REVELATION then it will WITHSTANDattack. It does withstand attack. So it is revelation.

If R then W. W. So R.

If R then W, W | R

Translating Arguments

If the Bible is REVELATION then it will WITHSTANDattack. It does withstand attack. So it is revelation.

If R then W. W. So R.

If R then W, W | R

R>W, W | R

Sequent Notation:R>W, W | R

Vertical Notation:R>WWR

Translating Arguments

If the Bible is REVELATION then it will WITHSTANDattack.. It does withstand attack. So it is revelation.

If R then W. W. So R.

Translating Arguments

Which sentence is the conclusion?

Premise Indicators:SinceBecauseFor:

Conclusion Indicators:SoThereforeHenceThusConsequently:

Translating Arguments

Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza.

Translating Arguments

Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza.

P because I. I results in P.

Translating Arguments

Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza.

P because I. I results in P.

P > I

Translating Arguments

Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza.

P because I. I results in P.

WRONG! ‘Because’ Indicates aPREMISE!

P > I

Translating Arguments

Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza.

P because I. I results in P.

Conclusion Premise

Translating Arguments

Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza.

P because I. I results in P.

I, I results in P | P

Conclusion Premise

Translating Arguments

Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza.

P because I. I results in P.

I, I results in P | P

I, I>P | P

Conclusion Premise

Translating Arguments

Don’t confuse antecedent indicators withpremise indicators.

Translating Arguments

Don’t confuse antecedent indicators withpremise indicators.

The moon is EDIBLE if it is made of CHEESE.E if C.C>E

Translating Arguments

Don’t confuse antecedent indicators withpremise indicators.

The moon is EDIBLE because it is made of CHEESE.E because C.

The moon is EDIBLE if it is made of CHEESE.E if C.C>E

Translating Arguments

Don’t confuse antecedent indicators withpremise indicators.

The moon is EDIBLE because it is made of CHEESE.E because C.

Conclusion Premise

The moon is EDIBLE if it is made of CHEESE.E if C.C>E

Translating Arguments

Don’t confuse antecedent indicators withpremise indicators.

The moon is EDIBLE because it is made of CHEESE.E because C.

Conclusion Premise

C | E

The moon is EDIBLE if it is made of CHEESE.E if C.C>E

Translating Arguments

Why > is different from |.

The moon is EDIBLE because it is made of CHEESE.E because C.

Conclusion PremiseC | E

The moon is EDIBLE if it is made of CHEESE.E if C.C>E

Click here for more