NYWEA 2019 Standardizing Sustainability: Capturing Data for NYC … Annual... · 2019-02-17 ·...

Standardizing Sustainability:Capturing Data for NYC DEP Projects to

Help Deliver a Sustainable NYCErika Jozwiak, ENV SP, LEED GA (NYCDEP)

Robert Pape, P.E., (AECOM)Amy Canova, LEED AP B+C (AECOM)

February 6, 2019

NYWEA 2019

Agenda

Sustainability at DEP• DEP Vision• Incorporation in Project

Delivery• Standard Operating

Procedures

SOPs & Case Studies• Energy Reduction• Recycled and Regional

Material

Program-wide Performance• Metrics• Trends• Next Steps

Sustainability at DEP

DEP Vision Statement

To be a world class water and wastewater utility, while building a

sustainable future for all New Yorkers

AIR, NOISE, AND HAZARDOUS WASTE• Update and enforce the Air Code to reduce local

emissions, and regulate hazardous waste and noise pollution

About NYC DEP

WATER SUPPLY• Deliver 1.1 billion gallons of water to 9.6 million New

Yorkers every day and maintain 7,000 miles of water mains

• Protect our 2,000 square mile watershed, including 19 reservoirs and three controlled lakes

WASTEWATER TREATMENT• Treat 1.3 billion gallons of wastewater each day• Operate and maintain 14 plants, 96 pumping stations,

and 7,500 miles of sewers

Capital Construction

• 10-year Capital Plan: $19.4 billion

• Includes the Bureau of Engineering Design and Construction’s projects in construction or design

• Provide in-house engineering design and project management services for DEP’s water supply, distribution, and treatment divisions

Triple-Bottom Line

EconomicSocial

Environmental

DEP

BEDC

PMO

ESD

Sustainability Section

Agency: Dept. of Environmental Protection

Bureau: Engineering, Design & Construction

Office: Program Management

Division: Engineering Standards

Sustainability Section

OneNYC

Growth

Equity

Sustainability

Resiliency

Vision 1: Our Growing, Thriving CityNew York City will continue to be the world’s most dynamic urban economy where families, businesses, and neighborhoods thrive

Vision 2: Our Just and Equitable CityNew York City will have an inclusive, equitable economy that offers well-paying jobs and opportunity for all to live with dignity and security

Vision 3: Our Sustainable CityNew York City will be the most sustainable big city in the world and a global leader in the fight against climate change

Vision 4: Our Resilient CityOur neighborhoods, economy, and public services are ready to withstand and emerge stronger from the impacts of climate change and other 21st century threats

Regulatory ComplianceLocal Law 22 of 2008 – 30% Reduction in Energy / GHG from City Funded Projects by 2030

Local Law 84, 85, 87, 88 of 2009 – Greener, Greater Buildings Package

Local Law 20 of 2011 – Rooftop solar analysis

Local Law 130 of 2013 – Electric vehicle charging stations

Local Law 66 of 2014 – 80% Reduction in Energy / GHG from City Funded Projects by 2050

Local Law 6 of 2016 – Geothermal Analysis

Local Law 24 of 2016 – Solar panel feasibility study for City buildings

Local Law 31 of 2016 – Low Energy Intensity City Building

Local Law 32 of 2016 – Updates Green Building Policy, expands jurisdiction

Local Law 97 of 2017 – MS4 Permit

Categories

• Greenhouse Gas Emissions

• Energy

• Climate Change

• Environmental Impacts

• Sustainable Sites

11

Project Delivery Timeline

Planning Design Construction Operation

Workshop 1

Workshop 2

Sustainable SitesEnergyClimate ChangeEnvironmental ImpactsGreenhouse Gas Emissions

Reporting Requirements

Planning Design Construction Operation

Case Study 1: Hunts Point WRRF Resiliency

Energy Conservation

Goals and Expectation

Energy Analysis

Benchmark

Baseline

Identify Viable ECMs

Energy Conservation

Measures

Design

Build

Operate

Establish Institutional

ControlsEnergy SOP for

Designs

Energy Operations & Design Policy

Construction

Energy O&M and Training

Typical Design Evaluations

• Reliability• Vendor/Manufacturer Reliability• Operation Complexity• Maintenance Requirements• Durability• Expense (including lifecycle)

Energy Considerations Added

• GHG Emissions vs. Lifecycle Costs

• Level of GHG emissions

• Energy Consumption vs. Lifecycle Costs

• Criteria Pollutants

• Develop Energy Conservation and GHG reduction SOPs for all construction projects

• Develop Energy Operations and Design Policies: Design kick-off meetings, BODR, all design milestones, and Bid Docs

DESIGN CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS

SOP and Policy Development

Policy Objectives

• Energy/GHG reductions from electro-mechanical processes

• Facility Layout (i.e. minimize pumping distances, blowers near discharge, etc.)

• Maximize ADG production and use• Control/Operational Strategies

(pumping, DO control)• Energy Source Conversion (heat recovery,

preheating sludge with digester effluent)• Process emissions and energy

(side stream treatment)

Design Services Goals

• Develop design options that consider energy• Generate an energy profile report• Baseline current condition energy consumption

and GHG emissions• Using direct measurements• Modeling• Predicted Future energy conditions via modeling• Perform an economic analysis for each option

Construction Phase

• Mindful of change orders• Identify modification that will affect energy/GHG• Existing analysis• New additions not previously investigated• Energy/GHG increases = 0 unless justified

Meeting Design Intent Operationally

• Identify the operational design intent with respects to energy and GHG emissions:

• Process (i.e. thickener operations or DO control strategies)

• Target operational set point• Maintenance requirements to keep

efficiencies high• Operational requirements:

Energy and systems monitoring

Evaluation Metrics

• Capital Cost per unit Energy Saved and metric ton of CO2(e) avoided

• Annual energy savings• Percent change in energy consumption and

GHG emissions• Simple payback• Lifecycle Costs (incl. O&M, escalation, and

useful life)• Net Present Value • Cash Flow Evaluation

Case Study: Hunts Point Resiliency

• NYC Wastewater Resiliency Program:• Hunts Point WWTP, Bronx, NY

• Minor flooding from Hurricane Sandy - floodwaters reached EL. +12.2 ft

• East River overtopped southern plant wall; flooded roadways• West Effluent Water Building flooded; electrical equipment

damaged

• 100-year flood event poses high risk of flood damage• Key strategies:

• Seal buildings• Elevate equipment• Construct flood barriers• Flood-proof equipment• Replace equipment as part of asset management upgrades

Case Study: Hunts Point Resiliency

• Energy efficiency improvements• Replace scum pumps in-kind

• Explosion proof

• Submersible

• Improved energy efficiency• Remove seal pumps entirely; no longer required for new

submersible scum pumps

• Sustainability KPIs• Energy = 20% reduction from baseline (existing conditions)• Emissions = 20% reduction from baseline (existing

conditions)

Case Study: Hunts Point Resiliency

Greeley and Hansen Design Engineers

MT/Yr

Case Study: Hunts Point Resiliency

Project is small with regards to energy reduction potential and had limited opportunities but…

IMPROVEMENTS WERE POSSIBLE

Case Study 2: Jerome Park Aqueduct

Rehabilitation

Case study: JRAQ-REH

• Jerome Reservoir and Aqueduct Rehabilitation, Bronx, NY

• Design complete, currently in final approval stage before going out to bid

• Purpose: improve water quality, improve site safety, maintain functionality of reservoir

• Scope of Work includes: • Structural rehabilitation

of reservoir walls• Repairs to retaining walls• Installation of diversion pipe• New fence and guiderail

between gatehouses 6 & 7• Roadway surface

and drainage improvements

Case study: Jerome Park Reservoir

SOP 056 Recycled and Regional Content for New Materials

• Purpose: Reduce embodied energy of new materials; reduce GHG emissions associated with transportation; and stimulate local markets

• Preliminary Sustainability Workshop sets initial KPI, e.g. 20% recycled / 60% regional (based on total weight (tons) of new materials)

• Design engineer required to evaluate recycled and regional opportunities

• What materials will be used?• Can they contain recycled content?• Where do they come from?

• Develop a Recycled and Regional Content Plan that summarizes likelihood of achieving goals set at PSW

• Did we meet our targets?• If not, can we identify further opportunities?• Do we need to adjust the goal?

• Submitted prior to Deep Dive Sustainability Workshop (SOP 051)

• Excludes mechanical, electrical, and plumbing components• For new materials only – construction waste is covered by

SOP 057

Case study: Recycled Content

• Data per 90% design submission and may change as design develops to final design.

• Note that this project started in 2016 – tables for capturing this information have since been updated and can be found in e-Builder.

• At DEP’s direction and to comply with NSF 61 Components, concrete that is in contact with potable water shall not contain recycled content (fly ash) due to potential leaching issues

Material:Total Weight

(tons)

Recycled Content Estimate

(tons)

Recycled Content Actual (tons)

Recycled Content

Estimate (%)

Recycled Content

Actual (%)

Concrete See Note 1 N/A N/AConcrete* 5,928 0 0Steel 20 6 28.9**Rebar 20 6 28.9Flowable Fill*** 1,518 1,260 83Mortar 38 6 15East Basin Outlet Flowable Fill*

1,109 920 83

North Basin Access Ramp new concrete

60 9 15

Schedule 80 PVC diversion pipe

45 0 0

Steel Pipe 6 2 28.9Steel Fence 48 14 28.9Box beam guiderail 20 6 28.9Parking lot new asphalt

697 0 0

Total: 9,510 2,228 23.43%Proposed Target: 20%

What materials will the project use?

Determine recycled content using actual % or estimates listed in SOP 056

Compare Estimate versus Target

Case study: Regional Content

MaterialSource

Distance (miles)

Envision Source

Distance (miles)

Estimated Quantity

(tons)Cost ($)

Regional Materials

Estimate ($)

Concrete 50 100 7,787Contractor to add costs

Steel 500 500 20Rebar 500 500 20Flowable fill 50 50 13,660Mortar 50 500 38East Basin Outlet Flowable Fill

50 50 9,978

Box beam guiderail 500 500 21Schedule 80 PVC Diversion Pipe

200 500 45

Steel Pipe 500 500 6Steel Fence 500 500 48Parking lot asphalt 500 500 697Total: 32,320% Compliant: 100%Proposed Target: 60%

Material Distance Requirement

Soils and mulches 50 miles

Aggregates, sands 50 miles

Concrete 100 miles

Plants (landscaping) 250 miles

Other materials (excluding equipment) 500 miles

Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing N/A

SOP 056 now uses weight (tons) for Regional Content, not cost

Criteria align with Envision requirements

Compare Estimate versus Target

Data per 90% design submission and may change as design develops to final design.

Case study: Specifications

• Recycled and Regional content goals are included in specifications • 01357 – Sustainability Goals and Procedures (5-digit)• 01 81 13 – Sustainability Goals and Procedures (6 digit)

• Bid Package includes Recycled and Regional Content Plan for information only, to assist Contractor to price accordingly

• Specifications require a Preliminary and Final Recycled and Regional Content plan be developed by Contractor

• Information captured via use of Environmental Materials Reporting Form (EMRF) – Attachment A of 01357/018113

Case study: Procurement

Overall Program Performance

Energy and Emissions

30% by 2017 30% by 2017

80% by 2050 80% by 2050

Energy & Emissions

Recycled and Regional Content

Recycled Content

Drivers• Embodied energy

• GHG emissions

• Sustainable procurement practices

Method • SOP launched 2016

• Specifications

Metrics• Material quantity

• Recycled content (% weight)

180K tons

Regional Content

100 mi.

50K Tons

Next Steps

Next Steps

• Envision v3• Construction phase tracking

• Forecasting new regulatory requirements

• SOP 053 – Energy & GHG• Non-process and process loads

separated• Real time metering

• SOP 056 – Recycled & Regional Material• Sustainable procurement • New procedure for soil reuse

Acknowledgements

www.nyc.gov/dep facebook.com/nycwater twitter.com/nycwater

Dennis J. Stanford, PE., ENV SP Chief, Engineering Standards, BEDCDennisS@dep.nyc.gov

Sara Igielski, E.I.T, ENV SP

Greeley & Hansensigielski@Greeley-Hansen.com

Claudia TobonHuman Resources Clerk, NYCDEPClaudiaT@dep.nyc.gov

Tom LongDirector of Program Management Office, NYCDEPTLong@dep.nyc.gov

www.nyc.gov/dep facebook.com/nycwater twitter.com/nycwater

Erika Jozwiak, ENV SP, LEED Green Assoc.

Sustainability Section Chief (Acting), BEDCEJozwiak@dep.nyc.gov

Amy Canova, LEED AP BD+C

Technical Leader – Sustainability, Buildings + Places, NY Metro, AECOMAmy.Canova@aecom.com

Rob Pape, P.E.

Senior Technical Specialist, AECOMRobert.Pape@aecom.com