On the Efficiency of Using Helical Piles in Liquefiable ... · Strain Gauge 56 Total 149 Property...

On the Efficiency of Using Helical Piles in Liquefiable Ground: a Shake Table Investigation

IntroductionSeveral past studies investigated the mitigation measures to

reduce the liquefaction-related consequences during strong

ground motions. These methodologies resulted in less

settlement of rigid shallow foundation once the liquefaction

triggered, however limited cost-effective measures have

been introduced to mitigate the liquefaction-induced

settlement of shallow foundations supporting structures. In

this study, the effect of using helical piles as a cost-effective

countermeasure to alleviate the liquefaction-induced

settlement of buildings has been studied. Two large-scale

shake table experiments were conducted at University of

California San Diego Powell Laboratory to investigate the

effectiveness of using helical piles in liquefiable ground.

Both experiments were conducted in similar ground

conditions, ground water level, foundation dimensions,

foundation contact pressure and input ground motions

except the fact that in the second test helical piles have been

utilized to underpin the shallow foundation situated atop the

soil model.

Experimental ProcedureSoil Properties, Testing Program and Helical Piles Instrumentation: Ottawa F-65 Sand (SP).

Two shaking sequence with varying peak accelerations.

Extensive instrumentation.

4 helical piles used as liquefaction-induced settlement Countermeasure.

7 pairs of strain gauges on each helical pile.

Large Scale Shake Table Test Results

Conclusion• Results from these two experiments highlighted a highly

improved performance of shallow foundation supported with

helical piles.

• Reduced EPWP generation below the foundation array in

helical pile test due to the densification of soil around helical

piles.

• The maximum bending moment along depth of helical piles

observed at the interface of loose and dense layer.

• The first experiment (Baseline) resulted in 28 cm average

settlement of the foundation due to liquefaction. On the other

hand, the helical pile experiment led to 1.2 cm average

settlement of the foundation in the same liquefiable ground

conditions.

• These large-scale shaking table experiments demonstrated the

usefulness of using helical piles as a cost-effective

countermeasure to mitigate the liquefaction-induced building

settlement in high seismic areas.

Fig.4. Instrumentation Layout Fig. 5. Model Prior to Shake

Fig. 9. Before Shake 1-1

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by funding through PEER (Pacific

Earthquake Engineering Research) and Ram Jack. Their support is

gratefully acknowledged. Furthermore, the staff at the UC San

Diego Powell laboratory and a group of undergraduate students is

highly appreciated for their assistance.

Fig.2. Helical piles, Bracket and Instrumentation

Fig. 6. Acceleration Time Histories for Baseline

and Helical Pile Tests

Fig. 7. Avg. Foundation Settlement for Baseline and Helical Pile Tests (Shake 1-1)

Fig.3. Helical Piles Instrumentation Sequence

Fig. 10. After Shake 1-1Fig. 1. Liquefaction-Induced Settlement of a Shallow

Foundation with and without Using Helical Piles

Fig. 8. Excess Pore Water Pressure Comparison for Baseline

and Helical Pile Tests along Depth

Principal Investigator: Motamed R. Associate Professor, University of Nevada, RenoStudent Investigator: Jahed Orang M. Graduate Researcher, University of Nevada, Reno

Boushehri R. Graduate Researcher, University of Nevada, Reno, Praphakaran A. Graduate Researcher & Elgamal A. Professor, UC San Diego

Fig. 11. Observed Ejecta

Target peak

acceleration (g)

Achieved peak

acceleration (g)

1-1 0.15 0.53

1-2 0.30 0.66

Type #

Accelerometer 14

High Speed

Accelerometer24

Pore Pressure

Transducer33

String Pot 18

Linear Pot 4

Strain Gauge 56

Total 149

Property Value

GS 2.65

emax 0.853

emin 0.503

Cc 0.96

Cu 1.61

ρmax (kg/m3) 1759

ρmin, (kg/m3) 1446

kloose (cm/s) 0.022

kdense (cm/s) 0.016

Induce

dBaseline (1st test) Helical piles (2nd test)

On the Efficiency of Using Helical Piles in Liquefiable ... · Strain Gauge 56 Total 149 Property...

Documents

Το βιβλίο του ρ

Exclusive ρ electroproduction

Trans PS Ch3 - documents.epfl.ch · Teneur en eau volumique ... Relation θ-w d w w ρ θ= ρ ρ d: masse volumique du sol sec ρ w: masse volumique de l’eau. Relation teneur en

2.imp. Sprachen 1 - uni-ulm.de€¦ · code (x := y) ρ = def code L x ρ; code R y ρ; sto T wobei code L x ρ = def ldc a ρ(x) code R y ρ = def ldc T y, falls y Konstante vom

890 McCarthy Suite120 - LoopNet...P3 P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 ρ ±10,924 SF ρ Available July 1, 2019 ρ Market Ready Renovation Underway ρ5 Private Offices ρ 2 Conference Rooms ρ Breakroom

3.2 Hydrogen Atomalan.ece.gatech.edu › ... › Brown_3p2_HydrogenAtom.pdf · 3.2 Hydrogen Atom ( ) 1 ..... = + 1 + + + − − − n q n q n n n n u Ao e A e A e ρ ρ ρ ρ ρ

Lecture 2: Cloud formation and Physics · Atmospheric thermodynamics: instability Moistvariables: ρ v = M v/V water vapordensity ρ d = M d/V dry air density ρ = ρ v +ρ d total

ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES TO EVALUATE THE INTEGRALS OF … · 52 Gao,Torres-Verd´ın,andHabashy where g(ρ,ρ 0)= i 4 H(1) 0 (k b|ρ−ρ 0|) (10) isthe2DscalarGreen’sfunctionandH(1)

単相流の伝熱、伝熱の基礎熱流動工学 - Osaka UniversityBaker 線図のパラメータ 2 / 1 W l A g ρ ρ ρ ρ = λ 2 / 1 2 l W W l W ρ ρ µ µ σ σ = ψ Wispy

Ρ 2016-04-05

АДАПТ БАЗОВОГО АФФЕКТ . , .. РА .. ШТАЙГЕРА · {9 —t 0.910 0.799 {10 —g 0.920 0.923 {11 —t £ £ 0.820 0.853

Σπύρος Ρ. Εργασία μαθητή

Ρηγόπουλος Ρ - Μυστικός Πόλεμος

Α Γ Ρ Ο Τ Ο Υ Ρ Ι Σ Μ Ο Σ

Vegetation Indices NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) NDVI = [ρ NIR -ρ red ] / [ρ NIR +ρ red ], where ρ NIR/red is the measured reflectance

Ρ 2016-04-12

ρ ρ ρ Crystallin (eq. 4.6) - ì ±ê· ê´ ë í êµhome.skku.edu/~femlab/lecture/introduction_mse/lecture8.pdf내부에너지E → 내부에너지E = 원자의운동에너지(kinetic

ρ value - IAIN Kudus

Some Remarks on Diffusion Distancesdownloads.hindawi.com/journals/jam/2010/464815.pdf · 2019. 7. 31. · C,t x,y 2 M ρ t v,x ρ t v,x dv M ρ t v,y ρ t v,y dv−2 M ρ t v,x ρ

SPECTRAL TRANSFORMS Spectral Vegetation Indiceslees.geo.msu.edu/courses/geo827/Lecture8_VIs.pdf · Land Surface Water Index: LSWI = (ρ red–ρ swir) / (ρ red + ρ swir) -Xiao et