Open Badge Passport:

Preview:

Citation preview

Open PassportEU

ROPO

RTFO

LIO

The projects Europortfolio and Badge Europe are funded with the support of the European Commission

1 July 2015Badge Alliance community call

Reinventing ePortfolioSTrust, the Revolution!

History

1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

10 e

Port

folio

Cha

lleng

es

Trust

Ope

n Tr

ust

Box

Building a Trust Infrastructure2008-2011

For the 7th ePortfolio conference, and in order to give directions to our work towards our 2010 goal (ePortfolio for all), EIfEL has decided to address a number

of challenges to the ePortfolio community and beyond —many of the problems the ePortfolio community faces today will not be resolved if they are not

addressed beyond the ePortfolio silo. The goal of these challenges is to move beyond the current state of ePortfolio development, in particular in the field of

interoperability as interoperability is not just a technical issue, but a means to enable new practices and the emergence of truly lifelong and life wide

ePortfolios.

Our main objective is to create the conditions for the emergence of MultiPortfolio organisations (one organisation can interact with many different ePortfolio platforms) and MultiOrganisation ePortfolios (have one ePortfolio to interact with many different institutions with their own platform).

1. Universal ePortfolio Repository —a unified view of all my assets

Context: Today, the digital assets used to create an ePortfolio can be hosted in many different systems managed by many different organisations.

Issue: How can we provide a unified view of all the assets belonging to one person, so she/he can seamlessly create ePortfolios without having to navigate through multiple sites? How can I reunite my digital identity?

Direction: Identity and access management (IAM) technologies, such as federation of identities and services need to be fully explored by the ePortfolio community.

NB: a universal repository is not equivalent to a unique repository; it can be universal while being distributed over a number of loosely connected and heterogeneous systems.

2. Universal Competency Identifiers —share competency definitions

across systems

Context: A number of ePortfolio platforms, and other applications in the field of education, employment, accreditation and human resource use competency frameworks. Today, the dominant delivery format of competency frameworks is a PDF file, forcing each system to import or recreate them from scratch.

Issue: How can we share competency definitions across systems and applications? How can we elicit emerging competencies through interactive technologies?

Direction: The creation of a competency wiki providing shared, distributed, multilingual URIs (Unique Resource Identifiers) to competency definitions. The solution to unique resource identifiers for competency definition has already been discussed by Simon Grant (Representing frameworks of skill and competence for interoperability). We have the technology required, what is missing is the political impetus and commitment.

3. ePortfolio social —share assets, knowledge and processes across

communities

Context: The idea of using social computing for ePortfolios is growing and a number of platforms have integrated such features. Nevertheless, the current implementation of social networking technology is mainly limited to connecting individuals as silos of information.

Issue: Let’s imagine a group of 100 people belonging to the same community (company, school, etc.) among which 10 are writing their own CV. Can we design a technology that will make it possible that at the end of the process, each of the 100 people will have (part of) their own CV written? How can we automatically generate and updated ePortfolios and CVs through social interaction?

Direction: Imagine that each time a person writes an elementary entry into their CV describing a professional experience, they have to name the people that shared the same experience; then for each person named, the entry is added to their ‘CV’, with the ability to edit it and share it back with the original author or create their own edited version of the entry. This way, each CV would be thread weaving a collective story. For the reader, being able to judge how an individual CV is connected to other stories, could even be an indicator of trustworthiness. The same reasoning could of course apply to ePortfolios.

4. ePortfolio semantic editors —make sense of what I write, connect,

etc.

Context: In 2003, during the first international ePortfolio conference in Poitiers, Christopher Tan presented Knowledge Community, a platform scaffolding learners reflection through semantic annotation, i.e. identifying key words and labelling them with semantic value, e.g. evidence, theory, example, etc. Since then, not a single editor of ePortfolio tools has included any form of semantic annotation.

Issue: We need ePortfolio editors that scaffold reflective thinking, not just enrich text with bolds, italics and ‘pink on purple’ effects. We need proper, simple semantic editors, as semantic annotation is a way to structure reflection, connect ideas, facts and people.

Direction: RDFa editors provide the blueprint for ePortfolio editors that fully support the components of a reflective process. At minima, be able to tag parts of texts/images, not just the whole document.

5. ePortfolio Readers —read any ePortfolio through consistent and

multiple views

Context: There are a number of ePortfolio platforms, each one with their own user interfaces and some people create ePortfolios without using any dedicated ePortfolio platform (e.g. content management system). And people want to be free to express their identity without being kept in the straightjacket of predefined templates.

Issue: How can we leave total freedom to ePortfolio author’s creativity, while providing readers with their own view through a consistent navigational interface, e.g. evidence on the left, competency framework on the right, etc.?

Direction: We might have to define different readers, depending on the process being involved, so the same ePortfolio could have different views generated by different tools. Such tools could be used by ePortfolio authors as tools to verify that their ePortfolio is properly structured and contains all the relevant semantic information.

6. Open & Trusted Service Architecture

Context: Today each ePortfolio platform provides a limited number of services and adding new services require the development of idiosyncratic plug-ins,

when this possibility is offered.

Issue: How can we provide ePortfolio owners with an unlimited number of services without forcing service providers to develop multiple plug-ins for multiple applications? How can we trust the usage made by services of our personal data?

Direction: This is connected to the idea of Universal Repository, exploited and enriched by service providers. Schools, universities, employers, professional bodies etc. need to provide conversational systems through trusted web services —a technology currently under development by different initiatives, such as TAS3.

7. ePortfolio based performance support system —make the ePortfolio

part of my work

Context: One of the current problems with ePortfolio adoption at the workplace is the fact that ePortfolios can be seen as something either nice to have or adding to the regular work. Moreover, the current level of integration of ePortfolios with other information systems is still low.

Issue: How can we make ePortfolio construction part of everyday activities? How can we demonstrate ePortfolio benefits through business benefits?

Direction: Use ePortfolio technology and methods to develop next generation electronic performance support systems, integrate reflection as part of routine work processes, so the ePortfolio is built through naturally occurring business activities.

8. ePortfolio discovery mechanism —find people, competencies,

resources

Context: While there are a number of methods for learning resources discovery (c.f. the learning resources exchange (LRE) repository of European Schoolnet) there are not yet universal mechanism to discover ePortfolios on the Internet, each individual relying on ad-hoc services.

Issue: How can we easily find an ePortfolio or a resource contained in an ePortfolio?

Direction: OAI-PMH (Open Archives Initiative's Protocol for Metadata Harvesting) is a possible method to create large indexes of ePortfolios per organisation, sector or even territory. Other methods could be the publication of ePortfolios in trusted parties' indexes.

9. URIs as tags

Context: Tag is a popular form to connect things together. within an ePortfolio. Unfortunately the meaning of tags is context dependent, and different tags can share the same meaning.

Issue: How can we create tags that are not context dependent?

Direction: make tags RDF triplets: name (what is displayed as ‘tag’); URI to definition (an hidden hypertext link); link type (is, is part of, etc.). NB: this is an extension of challenge #2. Two tags are close if they share the same URI and identical if they are identical triplets.

10. Universal Metadata

Context: ePortfolio construction is about connecting data together. Metadata are not just ‘comments’ about data, but links between all the data sharing the same metadata. If data are assimilated to neurones, metadata can be seen as.the synapses connecting neurones together..

Issue: How can we enrich distributed data with ‘personal/social metadata repositories

Direction: keep metadata repositories apart from data, on the model of social bookmarking.

e P o r t f o l i o c h a l l e n g e s

200910

ePo

rtfo

lio C

halle

nges 1. Universal ePortfolio Repository

2. Universal Competency Identifiers3. ePortfolio social 4. ePortfolio semantic editors 5. ePortfolio Readers 6. Open & Trusted Service Architecture7. ePortfolio based performance support system 8. ePortfolio discovery mechanism 9. URIs as tags10. Universal Metadata

Challenging ePortfolio technology

http://www.learningfutures.eu/ref/the-10-eportfolio-challenges/

Ope

n Tr

ust

Box

Can you imagine your life if you had to use different applications to edit, send and receive emails? Yet, it is what is happening with Open Badges. This is even embedded in 'roles':  the badge issuer, issues badges, the badge collector, collects badges. While this functional division made sense in the early developments of the Open Badge Infrastructure, this might soon become an impediment to further innovative developments and adoption...

The solution: the integration of OB services into Open Trust Box (OTB)!!If Open Badges are awesome, then the Open Trust Box (OTB) should be wondrous! And it should be relatively easy to build: simply integrate within the same 'box' a badge issuer, a badge (back)pack, a badge editor and a badge displayer.

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/openbadges/KcbGltKGX2o/-iBwP2KMwggJ

2013 Reviewing Open Badge technology

2014 A conversation with Eric Rousselle

An API of One’s OwnBuilding trust networks with Open Badges

Nate Otto, Concentric Sky

Serge Ravet, Badge Europe! Europortfolio

November 19-21, 2014 :: Washington, DC

2014 A conversation with Nate Otto

10 ePortfolio Challenges

Open Trust Box

conversations withEric Rousselle &

Nate Otto

2015

2015

2015

The "Designing Principles for a Trusted Environment" at SXSWedu seeks to have a discussion on trust and create a deeper understanding of how to operationalize trusted learning environments among various stakeholders, including: government, parents, educators, school & district leaders, students, foundations, nonprofits, and businesses. [...]

http://csreports.aspeninstitute.org/Task-Force-on-Learning-and-the-Internet/2014/events/details/0001/Task-Force-SXSW

http://www.learningfutures.eu/2015/04/openbadges-the-deleterious-effects-of-mistaking-security-for-trust-aspentrust-dmltrust/

2015

The Open Badge Passport adopts the radical position to treat Open Badges as "trust statements" and explore how such trust statements can be used to:

1. Create bottom-up trust networks

2. Generate new types of services exploiting the metadata contained in large collections of Open Badges

The Power

Trustof

A teenager had spent many months in a young peoples psychiatric hospital. When he was about to leave a therapist asked him what was the most significant thing which helped him in his recovery. He responded that it was the moment when in and art group the therapist asked him to fetch some art paper from a cupboard in another part of the building. The therapist handed him the keys to the cupboard which were on a key ring with many other keys to the rooms in the building.

They young man said he felt so good, not just because he had been chosen to do the small job when his esteem was very low but because the therapist had not hesitated but just handed him the keys. He knew he could have used those keys to get up to all sorts of mischief but he felt trust to act responsibly.

Julie Lunt <julie at newpaths.eu>

"The best way to find out if you can trust somebody is to trust them."

Ernest Hemingway

The Deleterious Effects of Mistaking Security for Trust

http://www.learningfutures.eu/2015/04/openbadges-the-deleterious-effects-of-mistaking-security-for-trust-aspentrust-dmltrust/

Trust vs Security

Trust vs Security

Trust vs Security

Trust and security work in reverse proportions

The more trust, the less extrinsic security measures are required, the more extrinsic security measures are taken, the less trustworthy the system becomes

Is it the world we want to live in?

What does it mean for Open Badges?

Open Badges as trust building vs Open Badges as control

The potential

The reality?

Control

Open Badges

as

EE

E

E

E

E

E EE

E

E

E

EE

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

EE

E

E

E

E

E EE

E

E

E

E

E

E

EE

Are Open Badges really centred on (l)earners?

II

I

I(ssuer), E(arner)

AsymmetryIssuer

EarnerEarnerEarnerEarnerEarnerEarner

In Power Not In Power

Ignoring the voice of learners!

At the recent Learning Pathways summit, two students gave some powerful feedback: “We don’t need a silly badge to tell us we learned something. We want to learn because we are interested, not because of some fake reward.” If a student told me “A Badge won’t make me care!” I would respond “Excellent!” A badge should not make you care; if it does, you might be caring about the wrong thing. The student’s response gets to the heart of the issue. If the ultimate goal of education is to create the self-driven learner, then the artificial motivation of badges is potentially problematic.

Timothy Freeman Cook

No Badge please Don't spoil !

...Tommy pleasure

Trust Bu i ld ing

Open Badges as

Trust!

Issuer Earner

Chains of trust

the revolution

Trust Open Badges for all!

A dream comes true! for all!

https://openbadgepassport.com/

Roadmap

• Currently: proof of concept • End 08/2015: migration to beta version• From 10/2015: developments and pilot programmes

Openbadgepassport.org**

Developer  community,  site  managed  by  Discendum*

Working  Group  animated  by  ADPIOS*

Github,  etc.

Openbadgepassport.com

Open  Badge  Passport  service  

hosted  by  discendum

DML  Open  Badge    Passport

Open  Passport  Services

Future  projects

Discendum Open  Badge  Community Outcomes

* initially, during DML funding

** Currently openpassport.me

Vision

Open Badges for all!

Yesterday Todayeverything bearing a badge can be endorsed

self-issued badges

Web services

Repository

AppsAPI

Kernel

Badg

e Is

suin

g

Car

eer

Man

agem

ent

Soci

al

Net

wor

king

Lear

ning

M

anag

emen

t

Find

Pee

rs

Lear

ning

R

esou

rces

Even

t M

anag

emen

t

Self

Empl

oym

ent

Dis

cove

ry

Serv

ices

Badg

e Ve

rific

atio

n

App Store...

S e r v i c e s

Tr u s t

Badg

e Is

suin

g

Car

eer

Man

agem

ent

Soci

al

Net

wor

king

Lear

ning

M

anag

emen

t

Find

Pee

rs

Lear

ning

R

esou

rces

Even

t M

anag

emen

t

Self

Empl

oym

ent

Dis

cove

ry

Serv

ices

Badg

e Ve

rific

atio

n

App Store...

S e r v i c e s

From collectors to connectors

Trust networks

People sharing the same badge are connected

A great property totally ignored by the OBI!

Everyone will have the right to issue badges (the right to trust!)

A legitimate right totally ignored by the OBI!

Self-issued badges Endorsement badges

In control of our identities

Everyone will have the right to self-issue badges

The power of discovery

From search engines to discovery engines

Metadata harvested in

Open PassportsReturn numbers of matching

profiles Notification of search

Decide to connect (or not) anynomously to

query

Query

Push information to

connected profiles

Find !Me

We will be able to exploit the metadata contained in badges

Nate's PassportAbout me Activity wall

Create Issue Search Organise ClaimDashboard NetworkEvidence Configure

CreatedIssued

Connections

My Dashboard

20 245

Badges Collected

47,405

Total Recent

1 30

Total Recent New

1,230 25,639

15Pledged

10

EndorsementCollected Issued

56124

Badges Issued

My Issuers Through Badges

VisitsTotal Recent

5612,453

Top Search

My Badge Earners

40

EvidenceTotal Recent

204,592

Create Issue Search Organise ClaimDashboard NetworkEvidence Configure

New PledgedCollections

EventsAchievementsCompetenciesEndorsements

PagesRésuméReflective RebelMentorship offersSummer job application

Create Issue Search Organise ClaimDashboard NetworkEvidence Configure

Organise Public Restrict. Private External Search

Qui at nonumy elaboraret. Ea delenit indoctum vix, mea accusam perpetua indoctum no, populo deleniti te eum. Eos quod alii patrioque an, ne ludus noluisse eum. Essent verear an cum, viris

accusata per at, liber interesset vix an. Blandit dissentiunt te mel, clita eirmod ne vel, mutat definitionem mediocritatem ex ius.!

Eu mei laoreet admodum, usu idque virtute suscipiantur eu. Ferri iriure menandri ut sed, no

rebum dignissim qui. Audiam molestie quo eu. Usu etiam dolor argumentum an, ne cum viris menandri assueverit.! Ei sea tantas platonem, pro audiam impedit apeirian ea. Per consul suscipiantur te, no stet recteque est.

Corpora disputando at vim. Atqui eirmod alterum sit ea, no quod tempor convenire pro, qui id habeo error moderatius. Ex has eirmod

PagesRésuméReflective RebelMentorship offersSummer job application

Create Issue Search Organise ClaimDashboard NetworkEvidence Configure

Organise Public Restrict. Private External Search

TypesBadges

Experience (xAPI)

Images

Texts

Create Issue Search Organise ClaimDashboard NetworkEvidence Configure

Miscellaneous

Pages

Evidence Public Restrict. Private External Search

Send Message to ePIC 2015 Delegates

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum."

Section 1.10.32 of "de Finibus Bonorum et Malorum", written by Cicero in 45 BC

"Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem. Ut enim ad minima veniam, quis nostrum exercitationem ullam corporis suscipit laboriosam, nisi ut aliquid ex ea commodi consequatur? Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit qui in ea voluptate velit esse quam nihil molestiae consequatur, vel illum qui dolorem eum fugiat quo voluptas nulla pariatur?"

Write to Message

2015

Create Issue Search Organise ClaimDashboard NetworkEvidence Configure

change?What will

Power shift

From Locked-into Linked-out

Recommended