OPEN FRACTURES Final Dr. Nishith Sharma

OPEN FRACTURES- CLASSIFICATION

AND - MANAGEMENT

Dr. NISHITH SHARMARESIDENT 2nd YEAR

NIMS , JAIPUR

DEFINTION• A soft tissue injury complicated by a broken

bone. • Break in the skin and underlying soft tissue

leading directly into or communicating with the fracture and its hematoma.

COMPONENTS OF OPEN FRACTURE

• Fracture• Soft-tissue damage/loss• Neurovascular compromise• Contamination

Extent of each component must be assessed individually in order to achieve a comprehensive understanding of the injury, upon which the treatment plan can be based.

METHODS OF CLASSIFICATION

GRADING SYSTEM – focus on severity of limb injury only Eg: Gustilo Anderson , Tscherne and Gotzen, Byrd

and Spicer etc

SCORING SYSTEM – focuses on limb injury and general health; also give ‘amputation score’. Eg: MESS , NISSA ,LSI, PSI etc

COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEM – combines the above two systems

Eg: AO system , Ganga hospital score

GUSTILO AND ANDERSON

Gustilo and Anderson

DRAWBACKS

Damage to functional structures and bone injury severity not included.

No emphasis on Co-morbid conditions. Poor inter-observer reliability especially with

inexperienced surgeons. Not useful in comparison of published

studies.

GANGA HOSPITAL SCORE

INTERPRETATION:- The total score was used to address the question of salvage and the outcome was measured by dividing the injuries into four groups (Group I - < 5; II - 6-10; III - 11-15 and IV - 16 and above of the total score)

ADVANTAGES

Good inter-observer agreement of 98.4 %.Evaluates all components of Injury and co-

morbid conditions.Good prognostic value in both Limb Salvage

and Patient Outcome.Effective in comparing different studies and

many centers.

STAGES OF CARE

INITIAL ASSESSMENT

• Important components in assessing traumatized extremity

1. History and mechanism of injury2. Neurovascular status3. Size of skin wound4. Muscle crush or loss5. Periosteal stripping or bone loss6. Fracture pattern, fragmentation7. Contamination8. Compartment syndrome

EARLY COMPLICATIONS

• Hypovolemic shock• Neurovascular injuries• Fat embolism• Infection

HYPOVOLEMIC SHOCK - MANAGEMENT

• Two large-bore IV lines should be started. • Once IV access is obtained, initial fluid

resuscitation is performed with an isotonic crystalloid, such as Ringer lactate solution or normal saline. An initial bolus of 1-2 L is given in an adult (20 mL/kg in a pediatric patient), and the patient's response is assessed.

INJURY TO BLOOD VESSELS

• Absent peripheral pulses in an injured limb should be considered to be due to vascular damage unless proved otherwise.

• Hard Signs of Arterial Injury - Absent Distal Pulses. Active Hemorrhage. Expanding Hematoma. Bruit Or Thrill.

MICROBIOLOGY

• Poor tissue oxygenation and devitalization of the surrounding tissues including the bone provide a perfect medium for infection and bacterial multiplication.

• When left open >2weeks – prone to nosocomial infection such as pseudomonas species and gram negative bacteria.

• This phenomenon of hospital acquired infection emphasizes the importance of a strict protocol for in-hospital management and early wound coverage.

IRRIGATION

• Supplements systemic debridement in removing foreign material and decreasing bacterial load.

• To be done as early as possible and in OT.

Fracture type Vol of fluid used for irrigation

Type I 3 L

Type 2 6L

Type 3 9L

ANTIBIOTICS

• Systemic administration:

ANTIBIOTICS

• Local antibiotics:• In gustilo type III fractures additional use of

local aminoglycoside impregnated polymethylmethacrylate(PMMA) beads reduces overall infection rate.

Relative Indications For Type Of Skeletal Fixation In Open Fractures

External fixation

• Severe contamination any site • Periarticular fractures

– Definitive • Distal radius • Elbow dislocation • Selected other sites

– Temporizing • Knee • Ankle • Elbow • Wrist • Pelvis

• Distraction osteogenesis • In combination with screw fixation for severe soft tissue injury

Relative Indications for Type of Skeletal Fixation in Open Fractures

Internal fixation

• Periarticular fractures – Distal/proximal tibia – Distal/proximal femur – Distal/proximal humerus – Proximal ulnar radius – Selected distal radius/ulna – Acetabulum/pelvis

• Diaphyseal fractures – Femur – Tibia – Humerus – Radius/ulna

INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING

• Locked intramedullary nailing has been established as the treatment of choice for most diaphyseal fractures in lower extremity.

• The technique has particular value for open fractures. Intramedullary nails can be inserted with no further disruption of the already injured soft-tissue envelope and preserves the remaining extra osseous blood supply to cortical bone.

INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING

• Data showing that solid intramedullary nails inserted without reaming have a lower risk of infection.

• On the other hand reamed intramedullary nails can reliably maintain fracture reduction with regards to angulation, rotation, displacement, and length.

• Prospective randomised trails that compared reamed with unreamed interlocked IM nails did not show any significant difference concerning outcome and risk of complication.

EXTERNAL FIXATION

• Advantages of ext Fixation-• Can be applied relatively easily and quickly• It provides relatively stable fracture fixation• There is no further damage done if applied

correctly• It avoids implantation of hardware in open

wound.

EXTERNAL FIXATION

• Major problems with external fixation are related to pin tract infection, malalignment , delayed union, poor patients compliance.

• External fixators are particularly useful in fractures with severe damage and contamination, where metallic implants – with risk of bacterial adherence – are best avoided.

• Ring fixators may be an option in diaphyseal fractures

EXTERNAL FIXATION

Types –• Ring fixators• Joint spanning external fixator

Open wound coverage after primary surgery

PRIMARY CLOSURE

If it is to be done, the following criteria must be met:

1. The original wound must have been fairly clean, and not have occurred in a highly contaminated environment.

2. All necrotic tissue and foreign material have been debrided.3. Circulation to the limb is essentially normal.4. Nerve supply to the limb is intact.5. The patient's general condition is satisfactory and allows careful

postoperative assessment.6. The wound can be closed without tension.7. Closure will not create a dead space.8. The patient does not have multisystem injuries.

DELAYED PRIMARY CLOSURE

• Closure before the fifth day is termed delayed primary closure

• As long as closure is achieved before the fifth day, wound strengths at 14 days are comparable with those in wounds closed on the first day

• Leaving the wound open minimizes the risk of anaerobic infection, and the delay allows the host to mount local wound defensive mechanisms that permit safer closure than is possible on the first day.

• Current standard of care for all open fracture wounds is to be left open initially.

• Delayed closure is accomplished within 2-7days

• VAC assisted wound closure is presently recommended for temporary management of open fracture wounds.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

RESUCITATION – Limb after LIFE. Cleaning and Dressing in emergency.Antibiotic and Tetanus Prophylaxis. Debridement and Irrigation in OT. Proper Classification of Injury for proper

Treatment and Patient Outcome.Proper Nutritional Support and Rehabilitation.

REFERENCES

• AO principles of fracture management 2nd Ed.• Campbell - operative orthopedics 11th Ed.• Management of open fractures by Dr. TSE

Lung Fung• Various sources on Internet.

THANK YOU