View
220
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
8/7/2019 Palestine-zionism and Peace
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/palestine-zionism-and-peace 1/10
8/7/2019 Palestine-zionism and Peace
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/palestine-zionism-and-peace 2/10
The Federation of Student Islamic Societies in the UK and Ireland 'This booklet has been designed to counter some of t t i c b 11t11titsthat have Ibeen raised on campus during the past year wit h recj~i lr l .~ Palestine,Israel an d Zionism. British campuses have seen a grtBcll111~~i lof
misinformation and forceful propaganda; the balanccl I11t't ~ ' I ~ I It' must beredressed by providing arguments and facts. This booklt.l I . . , I~owever,
II
only skeletal and more research is required by t he i n d ~ v l t l ~ ~ ~ ~ lIII order tobe more fully equipped on the issues.
8
Q. WHY DID THE PALESTINIANS REJECT THE 'PEACE
PROCESS'?
A. Since the collapse of the 'peace' talk s at Camp David, Is rael has
successfully waged a propaganda war to persuade the world that the
Palestinians are to be blamed for the collapse of the talks. Despite the
claims by the Israelis that 96% of th e Occupied Territories were
turned down by th e Palestinians, Robert Malley - President Clinton's
special advisor on Palestinian-
Israeli affairs-
says th at Clinton andBarak were equally responsible for the failure of the Camp David ini -
tiat ive (The Price of Camp David, Edward Said).
Firstly, Barak failed t o honour previous Isra eli agreements, assurances
which Clinton had guaranteed to Arafat personally. Barak had failed to
fulfil the promise to withdraw f rom three villages around Jerusalem
and to release Palestinian prisoners: instead, he allowed the rapid
construction of new illegal settlements on Palestinian land.
Further, the media reported that the Palestinians demanded the return
of 100% of the Occupied land and, failing this, opted for the Al -Aqsa
Intifida. I n reality, the 96% figure refers to th e portion of land over
which the Israelis were prepared to negotiate, and not the entireOccupied West Bank and Gaza Strip. Left out of the equation were
East Jerusalem - illegally occupied by Israel since 1967 - the huge
belt of Jewish settlements around the city and a 10 mile wide military
buffer around the Palestinian territories, along with the obligation to
lease back settlements built illegally under international law on
Palestinian land. The total Palestinian land on offer was actually
46% of the Occupied Territories (The Independent, 23rd July
2001).
The Israelis only offered 'control' over some Palestinian streets in
Jerusalem and Al-Aqsa Mosque, the territory above and below Al-Aqsa
being under Israeli sovereignty. Because Al-
Aqsa is of great signifi-
cance to Muslims, t his agreement could not have been accepted even
on the sole basis of what was being offered in terms of Jerusalem.
This 'Peace Process' was simply a repackaging o f the m ilitary occupa-
tion. The Occupied West Bank and Gaza are 22% of pre-1948
8/7/2019 Palestine-zionism and Peace
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/palestine-zionism-and-peace 3/10
Palestine. When the Palestinians signed the Oslo Agreement, they
accepted only 22% and recognised Israel within the green line bor-
ders, conceding 78% of historic Palestine. This is the gr eat compro-
mise tha t the Palestinians made; in return, Israel has not recognised
Palestine as a nation, only the Palestinian Authority and Arafat. To
demand 100% of only 22% of Palestinian land is not unreasonable.
For a just and lasting peace, the Palestinians must be given their
basic human rights, Israelis must withdraw from Occupied Palestineand the question of the mill ions of Palestinian refugees mu st be
addressed.
Q. DOES ISRAEL USE EXCESSIVE ffQRCE?
A. It is claimed by Zionists th at Israeli police and soldiers often have
no choice but t o defend themselves by firi ng bullets and, in life-
threatening situations, live ammunition. They claim this is in self-
defence and not excessive.
However, in th e past two years ther e have been.fifteen U.N. resolu-
tions/reports condemning Israel fo r disproportionate and excessive
use of force against Palestinian civilians and failure to adhere to inter-national laws. Other organisations to
condemn Israel include Amnesty International, Human Rights
Watch, International Red Cross and many others.
The Israelis have one of the worst human right s records in the world.
Under the pretext of security, the Israel i Defence Forces [IDF] ter-
rorise, tortu re and violate elementary legal and human rights obliga-
tions which are well documented. Amnesty has noted that Israel is the
only state in the world in having "effectively legalised the use of tor -
ture". One of the worst methods of punishment are curfews and
whenever an atroci ty occurs, Palestinians are placed under curfew.
A striking illustration was the massacre of 29 Palestinians praying ina mosque by an illegal settler i n 1994: this was followed by a severe
curfew o f Palestinians and th e killing o f more Palestinians (The Fateful
Triangle, Noam Chomsky).
The occasional trials of military officers do at timcrf, c,hcd l ~ g h ton prac-
tices in the Occupied Territories. For example, Ma]ot I )av~dMofaz tes-
tified "Israeli soldiers were given orders to harar," c t l ~ l c lheat up
Palestinian residents" and that they "viciously stttlc I( r l I \ ( l kicked
defenceless young Arab prisoners". He further 5 t i ~ ( l"C11' wclspersonallyordered to beat up Arabs by the West Bank cortltl1~111tl6~1the orders
came from higher up, f rom the Chief of Staff". He added that "the
army had orders to harass the West Bank population in general, not
just those involved in anti-Israel demonstrations" (Jerusalem Post,
24th December 1982).
Today, increasing numbers of combat soldiers and officers of t he IDF
are refusing to serve in the Occupied Territories as they refuse to
"dominate, expel, starve and humilate an enti re people" (Courage to
Refuse, www.seruv.org. i l /defaulteng.asp).On December 24th 2002, the death toll of Palestinians since the out-
break of the current Intifida was 2103, with more than 41 000
injured (HDIP, based on information available at t he time) by the IDF
who routinely use F-16 fighter jets, helicopter gun ships and tanks to
bomb and shell densely-populated Palestinian residential areas.
Since the beginning of t he Intifida, the IDF attacks on residential
areas, a form of collective punishment, has affected 73 000 people
and damaged large areas of agricultural land and other public and pri -
vate properties as well as water and electricity infrastructure
(Palestinian Humanitarian Disaster, U.S. Agency for Inter national
Development, July 10th 2002).
The IDF retook control earlier in 2002 of most areas under the juris-diction of the PA. It has imposed prolonged closure and curfews on an
unprecedented scale throughout the Occupied Territories. These
sweeping measures of collective punishment affect millions of
Palestinians whose access to work, education and medical care has
continued to be denied or severely restricted.
Furthermore, i t is estimated that since 29th March 2002, 1 5 00 0
Palestinians have been detained. Of these 1 7 00 have not had a trial
and are imprisoned without charges being brought against them (LAW
Society, 17th July 2002).
Until this excessive use of force against the Palestinians is ceased,
there can be no talk of peace.
WAS THE CREATION OF ISRAEL THE CAUSE OF THE
REFUGEE PROBLEM?
A. Zionists claim that the Palestinians left their homes in 1948 of their
own accord and tha t the Arab leaders stimulated the departure with
8/7/2019 Palestine-zionism and Peace
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/palestine-zionism-and-peace 4/10
radio broadcasts because they wanted the Arab world to declare a
holy war against the Jews. Further, they claim that the Palestinians
were asked to stay and live as citizens in the Jewish state.
It was only in 1 961 that t he tru th became clear, aft er months spent
by an Iri sh journali st retracing the evidence supplied by th e Zionists
in order to verify and establish the true story. He found that not a sin-
gle order, appeal, or even suggestion about evacuation from any Arab
radio station existed. Evidence was found, however, of Zionist stat ionsbroadcasting in Arabic in 1948 urging the Palestinians t o leave their
homes (The Spectator, 12th May 1961).
The expulsion of Palestinians was a resul t of Plan Dalet, the aim of
which was to clear the Palestinian population f rom th e areas of the
U.N. proposed partiti on plan. I n the words of Zionist historians,
the fa te of Palestinian villages that resisted was for them t o be
"destroyed and their inhabitants expelled beyond the borders
of the Jewish State". (Sefer Toldot Ha-Hagnah, Benzion Dinur)
Furthermore, in a report dated 30t h June 1948, written by the IDF
Intelligenc e Branch for the Israeli Prime Minister, i t is stated tha t the
Palestinian exodus was a result of three thi ngs primarily:
1. Direct, host ile Jewish operations against Arab settleme nts.
2. The effects of hostile operations on nearby Arab settlements.
3. Operations of Zionist terrorist groups such as the Irgun.
The report goes on to say that "witho ut a doubt, hostile operations
were the main cause of the movement of population " (Facts & Fables:
The Arab-Israeli Conflict, Clifford A. Wright).
The description of former Isr aeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin of the
conquest of Lydda, af ter th e completion of Plan Dalet, was so damag-
ing that portions of his memoirs were cut out by
the official Israeli censors. I n the version leaked to th e New York
Times and published in 1979, Rabin wrote: "We walked outside, Ben-Gurion accompanying us. Allon repeated his question, 'What is to be
done wi th the [Palestinian] population?' Ben Gurion waved 'his hand in
a gesture which said 'Drive the m out!"'.
Plan Dalet went into effect the first week of April 1948; by 1949, 700
000 Palestinian refuges and 513 Palestinian villages had been com-
pletely destroyed. Many atrocities and massacres occurred which are
now forgotten, the most infamous of them being the massacre of 254
Palestinians at Dier Yassin village (Al-Awda, Palestine Wight of
Return).
I n the words of Moshe Dayan: "There is not one place built in this
country that did not have a former Arab population" (Ha'aretz,
April 4, 1969).
QmDQ THE BALESUIZNEAMS WAVE A REGHUTo RETURN 80
1 THEIR LAND?
A. The Palestinian refugee population is the largest and one of the
longest-standing cases of forced dispersal in world history. There isnot j ust one, b ut four sets of Palestinian refugees in existence:
1.Those that fled prior to Israel's Declaration of Independence on
15th May, 1948.
2. Those made refugees by t he Zionists after th at date unt il t he end
of the year. By 1949, there were 726 000 refugees according t o th e
U.N.
3. Those forced out by the illegal occupation of the West Bank and
Gaza in 1967. Many of these were made refugees twice over.
4. Those being expelled every day in the West Bank and Gaza as the
Israelis continue t o confiscate Palestinian land t o build illegal
settlements and cancel Palestinians' residency rights.
Three quarters of the Palestinian population of today is externally o r
internally displaced. The U.N. General Assembly set forth the basic
framework f or a durable solution in Resolution 194 (111),
December 1948. The resolution affirms the righ t of each
refugee t o choose to ret urn t o his or her home and receive
compensation for losses and damages. The principles of R
194 have been reaffirmed annually now 135 times by t
U.S.A. and U.K. (Al-Awda, Palestine Right of Return).
The rights of the Palestinian refugees are considered inali
international law, which means that they ar e not invalidat
political negotiations and agreements between Israel, the
and America.
It is claimed by Zionists that Israel is a very small country
could not possibly absorb all th e Palestinians back t o the ir I
However, 78% of Israel i Jews are concentrated in 14% ofI territory, while 78% of the land - including those areas fro
the majo rit y of the refugees originated - has remained sparsely
populated. I n occupied Gaza, population densi ty is 4400 persons per
square mile, compared with 82 per square mile in 86% of Timet
(BADIL Resource Centre).
8/7/2019 Palestine-zionism and Peace
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/palestine-zionism-and-peace 5/10
Furthermore, between 1989 and 1997, Israel absorbed some 800 000
Jewish immigrants f rom the former Soviet Union and Ethiopia, while
claiming - at the same time - that Palestinian refugee repatriation was
impossible due to the lack of available space in the country. Those
who refuse to consider repatri ation as a solution should take not e that
unlimited Jewish immigration according to the Israeli "Law of Return",
together wi th the denial of th e Palestinians' r ight of r eturn is a sure
recipe for continued conflict, instability and war in the Middle East.
The fact that, according to Israeli press reports, over 27 percent of
Russian im migrants t o Israel are not Jewish, makes the continued
exclusion of Palestinians even more indefensible (Reclaiming the Right
of Return, Friends of Al-Aqsa).
This refutes all claims that Israel cannot absorb the Palestinian
refugees which i t is obliged to do under international law. This
injustice can only lead to continued conflict and instability in the
Middle East.
Q.DOES I S U E L DPSCWIMHNAVEAGAINST IT S PALESTINIAN
A M B CITIZENS?
A. Out of an Israeli population of 6 million, 18% are non-Jews.Zionists claim that the sole legal difference between Jews and Arab
citizens of Israel is that the latter are not required to serve in the
army.
However, since 1948, Zioni sts have employed Apartheid policies in
order to drive out the Palestinians and consolidate a purely 'Jewish'
presence in the whole of Palestine.
Those Palestinians who remained in Israel after 1948 did not
automatically become Israeli citizens. A non-Jew can never be a
national of Israel although he or she can be.a citizen. A non-Jew is
considered a citizen only if:
1. They were registered under the Registration of Inhabitants
Ordinance on 1March 1952, and
2. They were living in Israel on 1April 1952, and
3. They were living in Israel or in an area which subsequently became
Israeli territory from the date of the State's establishment until 1 April
1952.
All the land and buildings belonging to Palestinian refugees was
formally seized though the Abandoned Areas Ordinance of 1948. It
was followed by the Cultivation of Waste Lands Regulation which not
only applied to all land owned by t he refugees but also lands owned
by Palestinians who were (and are) citizens of the state.
Those Palestinians who were not expelled suffered as a result of
further laws. The Absentee Property Law of 1950 extended the
definition of absentee to include those Palestinians who lef t th eir place
of residence temporarily (to escape bombardment or to work in
another town). The Land Acquisition Law of 1953 completed the
Palestinian dispossession of 1948.
The Law of Requisitioning of Property in Times of Emergency of 1949
(which remained in force until 1958) allowed the Zionists to
'requisition' Palestinian land under th e pretex t of security and national
defence. The land seized under the pretext of these laws was then
transfer red to state ownership, and cannot, under Israeli law, be
resold to Palestinians. Through a complex system of legal and
administrative arrangements, public land is in the control of the
Jewish National Fund, an organisation committed to use funds in ways
"directly or indirectly beneficial to persons of Jewish race or religion".
These "national institutions" serve the interests of Jews, n ot th e
interests of citizens o f Israel, 18% of whom are non-Jews. Similararrangements would hardly be accepted in a "White State" by the
international community (The Fateful Triangle, Noam Chomsky).
There are other examples, such as tha t the state offers benefits to
large families, but restricts benefits to families of those who have
served in the ar my: hence discriminating against Palestinians wi thin
Israel. However, since religious Jews are also exempt from army
service, the legislation incorporates a special provision for families of
students in yeshivas (Jewish religious schools).
Discrimination affects numerous aspects of life, including education. A
report by Human Rights Watch highlighted the fact that the Israeli
government operates tw o separate school systems, one for Jewish
children and another for the Palestinian Arab children. The difference
between the systems is "stark": Palestinian children attend schools
wit h larger classes and fewer teachers, and frequently lack basic
learning facilities such as libraries and recreation space.
The claim tha t Israel does not discriminate against its PalestinianP
population is simply untrue.
Those Palestinian civilians who had been expelled or who had fled
from the war zone were not allowed to return to their homes when
hostilities ceased.
8/7/2019 Palestine-zionism and Peace
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/palestine-zionism-and-peace 6/10
Q. WHAT I S ISRAEL'S TREATMENT OF PALESTINIANS I N THEOCCUPIED TERRITORIES?
A. Since 1967, Isra el has illegally occupied th e West Bank and Gaza.
The Israelis claim that this occupation was due to security reasons, as
they were attacked by hostile neighbours who could attack again.
They say that Israel had no choice but to remain there and use force
and punishment where necessary.
However, according to Menachem Begin, the Prime Minister o f Israel
at the time of the 1967 war: "We had a choice. The Egyptian Army
concentrations in Sinai approaches do not prove that Nasser was
really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We
decided to attack him." [Jerusalem Post, 29th August 19821
Further, General Peled of th e IDF has said: "To pretend that t he
Egyptian forces massed on our frontiers were in a position to threaten
the existence of Israel constitutes an insult no t only to the intelligence
of anyone capable of analysing this sort of situation, but above all an
insult to the Zahal [Israeli army]." [Ha'aretz, 19th March 19721
Since the invasion of 1967, Israel has refused to comply withinternational law and has remained illegally in the West Bank and
Gaza. I n the name of security, i t has successfully demolished or
sealed over 8500 homes, of which 2500 were in East Jerusalem
alone. There are currently 2000 demolition orders in effect.
Houses are demolished as punitive measures or under the pretext of
"lack of building permit", while permits are rarely granted.
Palestinians are prohibited from building in 60% of the West Bank
and 87% of Jerusalem.
Perhaps most harmful to Palestinian human,.civil, and economic rights
has been Israel's policy of closure, in effect since March 1993. This
policy severely limits Palestinians' freedom of movement. B'Tselem, a
leading Israeli huma n rights monitoring organization states that
Israel's neglect of the educational, health, economic and cultural
infrastructure of the West Bank and Gaza during more than 33 years
of military occupation rendered Palestinians overly dependent on
services and resources accessible only within Israel or Jerusalem.
Thus, closure constitutes a chillingly effective fo rm of collective
punishment, as it brings Palestinian economic, medical, and
educational life to a virtual halt. Israel's draconian closure policy,
which denies Palestinians the freedom to travel easily -
or at all - between various areas and into Israel or Jerusalem to
pursue work, education, or medical care, has crippled the Palestinian
economy and caused significant economic suffering to scores of
Palestinian families, who now find themselve s in much worse straits
than they did during the days of outrigh t Israeli Military
Administration. I n Gaza, fully 40°/o of all households are living well
I
below the poverty line. According to the World Bank, the direct cost of
Israel's closure to the Palestinian economy is over five million dollars
per day.
Furthermore, renewable water resources in Occupied West Bank and
Gaza are under the control of the Israelis. Palestinians are only
allowed 83 cubic meters for each Palestinian per year, whereas th e
Israelis use 333 cubic meters for each Israeli per year i.e. one Israeli
consumes four times th e water of a Palestinian. Many towns and
villages are suffering from a severe water shortage as a result Israel'sclosure policies. Most Palestinian:; livi ng in refugee camps do not have
running water taps in their homes. A single water tap at the end o f
the street serves 30 to 50 homes.
I n the Gaza Strip, the problem o f water shortage is compounded by
the poor quality of water flowing through the pipes. This seriously
affects the quality of life of the local residents and exposes them to
severe heath risks. Continuous attacks by Israeli settlers onPalestinian water tankers prevent them from reaching their water
supply source-taps, which have been cut off by local Israeli settlers
who solely own and control the flow of water in t he region. Of the
water supplied to the Palestinians, th e quality is sub-standard and a
danger to health.
Jeff Halper of the Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions has
remarked: "The essential elements of Apartheid - exclusivity,inequality, separation, control, dependency, violation of humanrights and suffering - define the relationship between Israeland the Palestinians" (Middle East Report 216, 2000).
Further, according to Nelson Mandela: "Apartheid is a crime against
humanity. Israel has deprived millions of Palestinians of their liberty
) and property. It has perpetuated a system of gross racial
discrimination and inequality. It has systematically incarcerated and
) tortured Palestinians, contrary t o the rules of international law. It has,
in phicular, waged a war against a civilian ~ ~ p u l d t i o n ,in particular,I
I children."
8/7/2019 Palestine-zionism and Peace
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/palestine-zionism-and-peace 7/10
of the Arab-Israeli Conflict, Northwestern University Press)
Zionists oft en claim that Ottoman Turkish sovereignty over Palestine
had been ceded to Britain after the First World War. They refer to the
Sevres Peace Treaty, where reference t o the Balfour Declaration
occurs. However, this Treaty was never ratifi ed by the Otto man Turks:
it was aborted. The final trea ty signed between the Turks and the
Allied Powers omitted any reference to the Balfour Declaration.
I n conclusion, neit her the Bible nor t he Balfour Declaration confirm
any legitimacy upon Zionist claims on Palestine.
"Palestine belongs to the Arabs in the same sense that
England belongs to the English, or France to the French. I t is
wrong and inhumane to impose the Jews on the Arabs. What is
going on in Palestine today cannot be justified by any moral
code of conduct" - Ghandi (Mahatma, Tendulker)
A. Zionists claim that Zionism is the national liberation movement of
th e Jewish people, rooted in freedom and equality and oppcsed to
racism. Further, any critici sm of Zionism is deemed by them to be
anti-Semitic.
Zionism is a political ideology of complex European origin rooted in
the socio-economic realities of the Eastern European Jewish
community and the trai l of Captain Dreyfas in France. An Austrian
newspaper dispatched a journalist called Theodor Herlz to cover the
story. Until then, Herzl had believed that the solution of t he 'Jewish
problem' lay i n the assimilation of Jews into their resident countries.
However, the Captain who was unfairly convicted of treason, and the
wave of anti-Jewish sentiment tha t followed, changed Herlz's views.
I n 1896, Herlz wrote The Jewish State, in which he argued
assimilation was impossible, and the only real solution was a Jewish
state.
The plan for this 'ingathering' to be established in Palestine not only
blurred the distinction between Judaism and Zionism but also forged a
political identity out of a historical-religious ethnicity of which Zionism
would be the only legit imate expression.
I n 1975, th e U.N. described the ethnic exclusivity of Zionism as a
form of racism and racial discrimination. Although the U.N. Resolution
caused an outcry leading to the U.S. Ambassador to the U.N.
declaring i t to be anti-Semitic, none of its critics addressed the issues
behind the arguments considered for th e passage of the resolution.
The question is simple: are non-Jews in Israel legally discriminated
against because they are not Jews? Zionists argue that they are not
racist and point to the fact that non-Jews have the right to vote and
to be elected to th e Knesset. Zionists also cite the anti-racist law
which prohibits discrimination on t he basis of race, colour or ethnicity;
religion was left out so that religious discrimination is not illegal in
Israel.
Palestinians in Israel have a righ t to vote and hold citizenship; howev-
er, unli ke anywhere else in th e world, citizenship in Israel is distin-guished fro m nationality, and mere citizenship does not give an indi-vidual equal rights.
Israel was declared a state of the Jewish people: a state for all Jewish
people wherever they live. This is diff erent fro m state religion. For
example not any Anglican may come to the U.K. and automatically
become a national by mere virtu e of a shared religion.
Such, however, is the case in Israe l and only the Orth odox Rabbinate
definition of a Jew is followed and recognised. The Orthodox
Rabbinate insist th at Jewish ethnicity and religion are inseparable and
that a Jew is only bor n of a Jewish mother or converted to Judaism in
a conversion authenticated by the Orthodox Rabbinate. The Zionists
do not accept conversions done by the other two schools of Jewishthought. The Orthodox Rabbinate is not concerned with a Jew's beliefs
or lack thereof, but only his biological status. I n this manner, the
Orthodox Rabbinate have created an equation between religion and
race, w ith Israel being a state fit only for t he Jews.
"There can only be one national home in Palestine, and that a
Jewish one, and no equality in partnership between Jews and
Arabs" (Montague David Eder, President of the Zionist Federation of
Great Britain, 1931).
This policy results i n widespread discrimination against t he
Palestinians in all of t he professions at all levels of society from birth .For example, Jewish birth certificates have "Israeli" on them whereas
non-Jewish certificates have "NIA". Palestinians are urlrepresented
in acadaemia, medicine, law, politics and business. Arab
Israelis are among th e poorest of the country's population.
They are denied benefits such as the "retireme,litg' eeyivalent because
in the&@~try's mil i t
g ~ ~ ~ r n $ & tfrom d
iy pre-1967 Israel
k " Js
i
8/7/2019 Palestine-zionism and Peace
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/palestine-zionism-and-peace 8/10
by the government. As a result, the inhabitants of these villages have
no municipal services and are not allowed to vote, however they must
pay taxes (Jenin, Lebanon, and t he only democracy in the Middle
East, Jennifer Loewenstein).
Whenever Zionism or t he actions of th e Zionist state are criticised,
Zionists label th e critics anti-Semitic, as to suggest that only racists
and those who are non-Jews could ever criticize Israel and Zionism.
This is very misleading, as there are Jewish criticisms of both Zionism
and Israel.
Rabbi Hirsch (of Jerusalem) has stated: "The 12th principle of our
faith, I believe, is tha t the Messiah will gather th e Jewish exiled who
are dispersed throughout the nations of th e world. Zionism is diamet-
rically opposed to Judaism. Zionism wishes to define the Jewish peo-
ple as a nationali stic entity. The Zionists say, in effect, 'Look here,
God. We do not like exile. Take us back, and i f you don't, we'll ju st
roll up our sleeves and take ourselves back.' This, of course, is
heresy. The Jewish people are charged by Divine oath not to force
themselves back to the Holy Land against the wishes of those residing
there" (Washington Post, 3 October 1978).
Q. I S A BOYCOTT OF ISRAEL JUSTIFIED?
A. Since the call for the academic boycott of Israel, t here has been
much controversy. It s critics view i t as a violation of academic free-
dom.
Firstly, boycotts need to be put into a context. The first time th at the
academic community imposed a boycott on a state was during the
Apartheid regime in South Africa. The second time such an action has
been called is against Israel.
I n May 2002, a t the time of the Jenin controversy, Professor Steve
Rose, direc tor o f the Brain and Behaviour Research Group at t he Open
University, sent a letter t o the Guardian signed by 125 prominent aca-
demics stating that "the Israeli government appears impervious to
moral appeals from world leaders...However, there are ways of exert -
ing pressure fr om wi thin Europe."
"Many...research institutions, including those funded from th e EU and
the European Science Foundation, regard Israel as a European state
for the purposes of awarding grants. Would it not therefore be timely
if. ..a moratorium was called upon any furth er support unless and until
Israel abides by U.N. resolutions and opens peace negotiations with
the Palestinians?"
The Association of University teachers (AUT) has adopted a resolution
echoing Professor Rose's call.
So far, Israel has convinced the world tha t it is possible for the
Palestinians to live w ithout l and and water in isolated ghettos sur-
rounded by illegal sett lements and fences, bypass roads and IDF
posts. Despite 'peace talks', Israel now exceeds the crimes of thewhite South African regime.
No doubt, i f the boycott is successful, it wi ll affect researchers and
*,eholars: but th at is the logic of sanctions, which are meant to hurtthe political and economic systems. I n South Africa, t he firs t to suffer
were the Blacks; yet they still pleaded with the West to continue. A
leading South African vice-chancellor, Professor Brian Figaji, has
pledged support to t he British academic boycott of Israel, comparing
the Middle Eastern country's regime t o that of apartheid South Africa.
Professor Figaji said he had recently turned down invitations to take
part i n conferences in Israel. " I will not go there under the present
circumstances - this is a political statement against the Israeli state.
I t looks too much like South African oppression." Referring to t he
British boycott, he added: "So little is being done internationally vis-a-
vis the plight of t he Palestinians; a boycott is a way of signaling to the
world that what is happening is unacceptable and inhumane" (TheGuardian, 11July, 2002).
The boycott itself is being supported by academics even within Israel,
who feel that it is justified and in the long term will produce positive
result. Israel also enjoys a preferential trading relationship with the
E.U., its second most impo rtant tradi ng partner aft er the U.S. The
most substantial exports are fruits, vegetables and clothing (supplying
to Marks & Spencer, Donna Karen and Calvin Klein t o name a few).
When goods are manufactured or produce grown in the Occupied
Territories, illegally by settlers, they are labelled "Made in I srael" and
exported as coming from within Israel's pre- 1967 borders, hence
enabling Israel t o avoid E.U. excise duty. I n July 2001, a boycott cam-
paign was launched in the U.K. called "Boycott Israeli Goods" (B.I.G.)to highlight the activities of the Israeli government. This campaign is
Europe-wide and growing.
After 36 years of occupation, it is clear that Israel has no intention of
withdrawing and expects the Palestinians t o live with Apartheid or
8/7/2019 Palestine-zionism and Peace
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/palestine-zionism-and-peace 9/10
'transfer': which means mass expulsion from the Occupied West Bankand Gaza.The facts are that Israel is in violation of over 80 U.N. reso-
lutions and has continued a policy o f oppressive, expanding and illegal
occupation of another people's land.
Such a record would not be tolerated if the country in question were
France, Germany or any other member of the European Union.
Indeed, "If Palestinians were black, Israel. would now be a pari-ah state subject to economic sanctio dStates" (The Observer, 15th October
Design & Print by
impress 24Carr Street, BatleyCarr,
Dewsbury,West Yorkshire, WF13 2HF
.eTel: (01924) 45 88 88 Fax: (01924) 45 88 77
printersEmail:enquiries@impressprinters.com
abdullah.yusuf@ntlworld.com
8/7/2019 Palestine-zionism and Peace
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/palestine-zionism-and-peace 10/10
"And hold fast to the rope of Allah, all of you tcigether,
and be not disunited" "(~o~yCtufan 3 1031
.- ------ -- - - - - .-.-THE FEDERATION OF STUDENT ISLAMIC SOCIITIES (FOSIS)
FOSIS, the Federation of Student
lslami c Societies in UK and Ireland, is
an independent voluntary student
organisation and is one of the leading
Muslim student organisations in Europe.
It has links with over 10 0 lslamic
Societies and has established
relationships with the National Union of
Students (NUS) and other key student
organisations in t he UK and Europe. As
one of the oldest and most established
organisat ions in the UK, FOSlS has
developed a variety of resources andspecialised teams to assist and
represent Muslim students within
universities and other educational
institutions, making it a primary source
of reference for Muslim as well as
non-Muslim organisations.
As an independent body, FOSlS enjoys a
unique position allowing different
Muslim and non-Muslim groups to work
for the betterment and needs of lslamic
Societies, Muslims and the wider
student body.
FOSlS Office
3 8 Mapesbury Road
London
NW2 4JD
The work of FOSlS is guided principally
by the following aims and objectives:
* To unite all existing student lslamic
societies in the UK and Ireland on
lslamic principles;
* To represent Muslim Students
and lslamic Societies at al l levels;
* To protect and promote the interests
of Muslim students;
* To encourage the format ion of new
lslamic societies on campuses and to
support the activities of existing ones;* To facilitate communication and
co-ordination among lslamic Societies;
* To develop the Muslim student's
understanding, character and skills in
line wit h lslami c principles;
* To promote understanding of Islam
and Muslims, in an effort to eradicate
intolerance and lslamophobia fro m
campuses and our British society;
* To encourage understanding between
Muslim 81non-Muslim students.
Tel: 02 08 45 2 4493
Fax: 0 208 2 08 41 61
Email: info@fosis.org.uk
Website: www.fosis.org.uk
Recommended