View
34
Download
0
Category
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE Integrated Transformation Program Performance Governance System. PRO 3 ITP PGS SCORECARD MEASURE PROFILE. UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011. MEASURE PROFILES Annexes A Regional Economic Development Index B PRO 3 Regional Performance Approval Rating - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE
Integrated Transformation ProgramPerformance Governance System
PRO 3 ITP PGS SCORECARD
MEASURE PROFILE
UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011
MEASURE PROFILES Annexes
A Regional Economic Development Index B PRO 3 Regional Performance Approval RatingC % of Pol Stns compliant with HRD ComponentD % of Pol Stns compliant with Process & System ComponentE % of Pol Stns compliant with Facilities Development ComponentF % of Pol Stns compliant with Citizen’s Empowerment Component G Ratio of Human Rights violations/cases reported against Police personnel H Regional Crime Clearance EfficiencyI Regional Crime Solution EfficiencyJ % reduction of incidence of armed insurgents Activities and No. of Barangay AffectedK Average Rating of Qualified PNP ApplicantsL % of personnel completed mandatory courses M % of personnel completed competency/specialized courses N % of personnel assigned to positions according to their Competency & skillsO Grievance RatioP % of personnel provided with housing, Quartering, Educational Assistance and Health careQ % of policies implementedR % of required audits conductedS PRO-3 Resolution Rate of complaints on CorruptionT Fund Utilization Efficiency Distribution Scheme(15%:85%, PRO:Field Units)U Maintenance Management SystemV % of LGUs whose support to PPOs/CPOs/Stn Institutionalized( with POCs)W % of LGUs with sustained initiatives for safer communities with the PNPX % of Police Station with LGUs Anti-Criminality Action PlanY Number of sustained ITP initiatives undertaken with the Interest GroupsZ Number of regular interactions with other pillars of the CJS
UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011
Objective: A safer place to live, work and do businessRationale: Improvement of Gross Regional Domestic Product Growth Rate of Region 3 is indicative of a progressive socio-economic situation for a more stable, peace and order situation.
How often is the measure updated/calculated? Yearly
What is the unit of measure used? Regional Economic Development index
What data is required in calculating the measure? Gross Regional Domestic Product Growth Rate of Region 3 at constant (1985) prize.
Where/How is it acquired? Through liaisoning with NEDA
Is information about the measure available? Yes
When will this information be available? As obtained from source
How is the measure calculated? As determined by source
Who is responsible for setting targets? NGAsWho is accountable for targets? NGAs
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RPCRD
BASELINE
2009
(1.4 %)GRDP Growth
Rate at constant
(1985) prize.
TARGET
2011
2013
2016
Regional Economic Development Index
A UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011
Objective: Effectively enforce laws
Rationale: By effectively enforcing laws, perception and impression performance will result in the community’s positive public perception.
How often is the measure updated/calculated? As determined by source yearly
What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of overall performance approval index
What data is required in calculating the measure? As determined by source
Where/How is it acquired? Data from Pulse Asia or Asia Pacific Center for Research
Is information about the measure available? Yes, as obtained from source
When will this information be available?
As obtained from source
How is the measure calculated? As determined by source
Who is responsible for setting targets? NGAsWho is accountable for targets? NGAsWho is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RPCRD
BASELINE2010
67%(PNP Approval
Rating by Pulse Asia )
TARGET
2011
2013
2016
PRO3 Performance Approval Percentage Rating
B UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011
Percentage of Police Stations Compliant with HRD Component of a Model Police Station
Objective: All PRO3 Police Stations shall be comparable to the Model Police Stations.
Rationale: In line with the Model Police Stations project.
How often is the measure updated/calculated? Quarterly
How is the measure calculated?
MR – Moral Recovery , SVF – Spiritual Values Formation, CB - Capacity Building A. Individual Compliance to HRD component = (MR /SVF*45) + (CB * 55) Note: Maximum of 1 MR/SVF for the last 2 years, and 1 CB training appropriate to designation.
Sum of Individual Compliance of all PersonnelB. Police Station Compliant = ---------------------------------------------- to HRD component Total Nr of Personnel
Nr of Police Stations Compliant to HRD component C. Percentage of Police Stations = ----------------------------------------------- Compliant with HRD component Total Nr of PRO Police Stations
What data is required in calculating the measure?A.Police Station Training Profile, Police Station List. B.Table of CB appropriate training for designation.
Where /How is it acquired ? Consolidated Quarterly Reports submitted by PPOs/CPOs.
Is the information about measure available? Yes, currently available
*100
Who is the responsible for setting the targets? RPHRDD.Who is accountable for targets? RPHRDD
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting the targets? PPOs/CPOs and RPHRDD.
BASELINE TARGET
2010 2011 2013 2016
6% 20% 60% 100%
(
C
)
Table of CB Appropriate Training for Designation
Designation Class Minimum Training Required
Admin Human Resources Mgmt Crs
Intel Intel Orientation, Intel Analysis, PIC
Operation Specialized Planning Crs
Invest Basic Criminalistics, CIDC, SOCO, CRIDEC
PCR PCR Specialists Course, Psy Ops Crs
Logistic Basic Logistic, Logistic Mgmt , Supply & Property Mgmt Crs, Logistics Mgmt Seminar
Finance Comptrollership, Finance Crs
Patrol Police Responders Crs, SCOUT
Note: Or other related Seminars conducted at least at the PPO Level.
UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011
D
Objective
To establish QSL in all police stations.
Rationale
To better serve the community
How is the measure calculated? Clarify in terms of formula.
No. of police stations established QSL
Is information about the measure available?
Available with minor changes
When will this information be available?
Monthly.
Percentage of Police Stations compliant with process and system component
How often is the measure updated / calculated? Quarterly
What is the unit of measure used? Number of Police Stations complied
What data is required in calculating the measure? Where /How is it acquired?
Summation of number of police stations compliant with the establishment of QSL.
Who is responsible for setting targets? RPCRD
Who is accountable for targets? RPCRD
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RPCRD
TARGET
Base line2010
2011 2013 2016
6% 25% 50% 75%
UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011
Total No. Of Police StationX 100
E
Objective
To establish Model Police Station within the entire region.
Rationale
For the PNP personnel to have a decent Police Station to better serve the community.
How is the measure calculated? Clarify in terms of formula.
No. of police stations owned and constructed within the region
Is information about the measure available?
Currently available
Percentage of Police Stations compliant with Facilities Development
How often is the measure updated / calculated? Quarterly
What is the unit of measure used? Number of Police Stations owned and constructed
What data is required in calculating the measure? Where /How is it acquired?
No. Police Stations owned constructed / total number of Police Station x 100
Who is responsible for setting targets? PNP NHQWho is accountable for targets? ORLDD Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? ORLRDD
TARGET
Base line2010
2011 2013 2016
33.59% 36.7% 44.53% 57.81%
UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011
F
Percentage of Police Station Compliant w/ Citizen’s Empowerment Component
Objective
Adopt the best practices in the community and rights based policing supported by appropriate information and communication technology.
Rationale:
It is an established component of model police station.
How is the measure calculated?
Numbers of Police Stations that displayed the service standard and flowcharts of PNP Citizen’s Charter / Total No. Of Police Stations X 100
Is information about the measure available?
Available with minor changes
When will this information be available?
Monthly
How often is the measure updated / calculated?
Monthly
What is the unit of measure used?
Number of Police Stn complied
What data is required in calculating the measure? Where /How is it acquired?
Summation of the numbers of police stations that are compliant with the displaying of service standard and flowchart of PNP Citizen’s Charter.
Who is responsible for setting targets?
RPCRD
Who is accountable for targets?
RPCRD
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets?
RPCRD
TARGET
Base line2010
2011 2013 2016
100% maintaine
d
100% maintained
100% maintained
100%maintained
UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011
Objective: Adopt the best practices in community and rights-based policing supported by appropriate information and communication technology.
Rationale: Reduction of human rights violation/cases are best indicator for human rights compliance.
How often is the measure updated / calculated? The measure will be updated/calculated on a quarterly and annual basis.
What is the unit of measure used? No. of cases of HRV per period.
What data is required in calculating the measure? Where/How is it acquired? The data is acquired through liaisoning with CHR from PPOs/CPOs.
Is information about the measure available? Currently available based on CHR Data
When will this information be available? As soon the data is available at CHR
How is the measure calculated? No. of human rights violations compared with previous data covering the same period.
Who is responsible for setting targets? RPCRDWho is accountable for targets? RPCRDWho is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RPCRD
BASELINE2010
0: 9,679(Total No. of PRO3
PNP personnel )
TARGET
2011 0
2013 0
2016
0
Ratio of human rights violations/cases filed in court against PNP personnel over population
G UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011
How often is the measure updated/calculated? Monthly
What is the unit of measure used? % of total crime cleared and total crime volume
What data is required in calculating the measure? UCPER
Where/How is it acquired? Through the reports from the different police stations.
How is the measure calculated?
Crime Clearance Efficiency = Crime Cleared x 100% Crime volume
Crime Volume – number of crime incidents committed in a given area over a period of time which includes index and non-index crimes.
Is information about the measure available? Currently available
When will this information be available? Monthly
Who is responsible for setting targets? RIDMD
Who is accountable for targets? RIDMD
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RIDMD
Objective: To improve the partial solution rate of criminal incidence. To improve the number of cases filed vis-à-vis the number of crime incidence reported to PRO3. Rationale: To reflect the true crime rate and come up with generation of a timely and accurate crime statistics.
BASELINE TARGET
2010
15.77%
2011
16.27%
2013
17.27%
2016
18.77%
Regional Crime Clearance Efficiency
H
* CCE targeted at .5% increase per annum based on DIDM
UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011
Objective: To improve the number of cases filed vis-à-vis number of crime incident reported
Rationale: To reflect the law enforcement agencies investigative capability or efficiency in the process of solving crime.
How often is the measure updated/calculated? Monthly
What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of Solved cases out of the total crime volume.
What data is required in calculating the measure? Total Cases Solved and Crime Volume
Where/How is it acquired? Through the reports from the different police stations.
How is the measure calculated? Crime Solution Efficiency = Solved Cases x 100 Crime Volume
Crime Volume – No. of crime incidents committed in a given area over a period of time which includes Index and Non- Index crimes reported to the PNP.
Who is responsible for setting targets? RIDMD – RAD
Who is accountable for targets? RIDMD – RAD
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RIDMD - RAD
Is information about the measure available? Currently available
When will this information be available? Anytime
BASE-LINE TARGET
2010
8.76%
2011
9.26%
2013
10.26%
2016
11.76%
Regional Crime Solution Efficiency
I UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011
Objective: Achieve excellence in performing the integrated QUAD operation to overcome the insurgency problem
Rationale: Insurgent activities constitute a major threat to peace and order and hinder the socio economic-political stability of an area
How is the measure calculated? No. of incidents in Current Yr – No. of incidents in Previous Yr No. of incidents of Previous Yr
No. of brgys affected in Current Yr – No. of brgys affected in Previous Yr No. of brgys affected of Previous Yr
Is information about the measure available?
Currently available
When will this information be available?
Monthly
Who is responsible for setting targets? Regional QUAD staff
Who is accountable for targets? Regional QUAD staff
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? Regional QUAD staff
How often is the measure updates / calculated? Daily/monthly
What is the unit of measures used? Percentage reduction
What data is required in calculating the measure? No. of armed incidents and of no. barangays affected
Where/How is it acquired? Daily Intelligence Brief (DIB)
Percentage reduction of incidence of armed insurgent activities and Barangays affected
J
Baseline 2010
2011 2013 2016
No. of Insurgent Armed Activities
21
15% less 4
incidents
18%Less 3
incidents
21%Less 4
incidents
No. of affected barangays
39
20%Less 8
affected barangays
25%Less 8 affected
barangays
30%Less 7
affected barangays
UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011
Average Rating of Qualified PNP Applicants
Objective: To entice at least 250% number of PNP recruitment quota to have a better basis in determining the most qualified applicants.
Rationale: Applicant is given corresponding points for the following in reference with NHQ PNP Circular No. 2005-008 dated June 29, 2005 (Rationalization of the Qualified Standards for the Initial appointments to the rank of Police Officer I):
How often is the measure updated/calculated? Every Recruitment Program/Quota
What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of Number of Recruits and Average Rating obtained by the recruits.
How is the measure calculated? Nr . of Applicants Nr. of Quota
Final Grade of an applicant is computed as follows: Education (Minimum 21 pts, Maximum 30 pts), Eligibility (Minimum 21 pts, Maximum 30 pts), Agility Test (Minimum 11.25 pts, Maximum 15 pts), Interview (Minimum 16.75 pts, Maximum 25 pts) , Board Passers of their courses are given higher points in Education. Plus bonus points for honor graduates and those with LLB units. Rating on board exam/PNP Entrance or CSC Prof is the basis for Eligibility points. Plus 1 pt for any additional eligibility. The top ranking applicants will be selected for appointment.
X 100
Who is the responsible for Setting the Targets? RPHRDD.
Who is accountable for targets? RPHRDDWho is Responsible for tracking and reporting the targets? RPHRDD
BASELINE TARGET
2010 2011 2013 2016
173%
1,612 applicants vis-à-vis
930 quota
250% 250% 250%
K
What data is required in calculating the measure? Number of Recruit and Sum of Final Grade of all Recruit and Allotted Quota for PRO3
Where /How is it acquired ? Worksheets and Table evaluations of documents submitted by the applicants.
UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011
Percentage of Personnel Completed Mandatory Courses
Objective: Train and develop a well-motivated and competent police force committed to serve and protect the people
Rationale: Train and develop a well-motivated and competent police force committed to serve and protect the people. All PRO3 should have undergone the mandatory course required to their rank to enable them to discharge the responsibilities tasked to them.
How often is the measure updated/calculated? Quarterly
What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of Total Number of PNP Personnel of PRO3 with mandatory training/ schooling required for the current rank.
How is the measure calculated?
Total Nr of Personnel with mandatory training/schooling required for the current rank Total Nr of PNP Personnel of PRO3
What data is required in calculating the measure? Updated Training Profile and Updated Strength Profile of PRO3
Where /How is it acquired (specify document/or person)
Consolidated Training Profile and Strength profile from RHQs/PPOs/CPOs/3rd RPSB
X 100
Is the information about measure available? Yes, currently available.
Who is the responsible for Setting the Targets? DHRDD, DPRM and RPHRDD.
Who is accountable for targets? DHRDD, DPRM and RPHRDD
Who is Responsible for tracking and reporting the targets? RHQs/PPOs/CPOs/3rd RPSB
BASE-LINE
TARGET
2010 2011 2013 2016
85% 90% 95% 100%
L
( )
UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011
Objective: Train and develop a well-motivated and competent police force committed to serve and protect the people
Rationale: Train and develop a well-motivated and competent police force committed to serve and protect the people.
How often is the measure updated/calculated? Quarterly
What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of Total Number of PNP Personnel of PRO3 completed competency/ specialized course.
How is the measure calculated?
Total Nr of Personnel completed in-service training Total Nr of PNP Personnel of PRO3
What data is required in calculating the measure? Nr of Personnel completed in-service training
Where /How is it acquired (specify document/or person) Training profile of Personnel who completed in –service training from RHQs/PPOs/ CPOs/3rd RPSB
Is the information about measure available? Yes, currently available
Who is the responsible for Setting the Targets? DHRDD, DPRM and RPHRDD.
Who is accountable for targets? DHRDD, DPRM and RPHRDD
Who is Responsible for tracking and reporting the targets? RPHRDD/RHQs/PPOs/CPOs/3rd RPSB
BASELINETARGET
2010 2011 2013 2016
60% 65% 85% 100%
M
)( X 100
Percentage of personnel completed in –service training
UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011
Percentage of all personnel assigned to positions according to their competency and skills
Objective: Uphold and promote the principles of meritocracy and fitness in the PNP career ladder
Rationale: Required Placement for Police Superintendent Based on the Updated Provisional List of Position for PSUPT as of June 29, 2010 and Police Chief Inspector Based on the Updated Provisional List of Position for PCINSP as of January 2009
How often is the measure updated/calculated? Monthly
What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of Total Number PSUPT and PCINSP occupying T.O. Positions
How is the measure calculated?
Total No. of PSUPT and PCINSP occupying T.O. Positions Allocated PSUPTs and PCINSP Positions
Is the information about measure available? Yes, currently available
Who is the responsible for Setting the Targets? RPHRDD.
Who is accountable for targets? RPHRDDWho is Responsible for tracking and reporting the targets? RPHRDD
BASE-LINE
TARGET
2010 2011 2013 2016
54% 70% 100% 100%
N
X 100( )
What data is required in calculating the measure? Nr. of PNP Personnel without competency /specialized course
Where /How is it acquired?
Monthly Report of Placement of PSUPT and PCINSP from the PPOs/CPOs/ RPSB3
UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011
Grievance Ratio
Objective: To address immediately any valid complaint by member(s) of the PNP
Rationale: Promote the Grievance System of the PNP where they can voice out their grievances and not in other venues. Speedy disposition of these Grievances will result to the PNP personnel’s trust in the System.
How often is the measure updated/calculated? Quarterly and Annual Basis
What is the unit of measure used? Ratio of grievances resolved to the total number of grievances filed.
How is the measure calculated? Nr of Grievances Resolved : Nr of Grievances filed What data is required in calculating the measure? Nr. of grievances filed and resolved
Where /How is it acquired (specify document/or person)
Report from RHQs/PPOs/ CPOs/3rd RPSB
Is the information about measure available? Yes, currently available
Who is the responsible for Setting the Targets? RPHRDD
Who is accountable for targets? Immediate Superior or Chief of office Who is Responsible for tracking and reporting the targets? RPHRDD and Immediate Superior or Chief of Office
BASELINE TARGET
2010 2011 2013 2016
0:0 1:1 1:1 1:1
O UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011
Percentage of Personnel provided with Housing, Quartering, Educational assistance and Healthcare
Objective: Institutionalize adequate package of benefits and remunerationRationale: To determine the nr of Personnel who availed of housing, Quartering, educational assistance and healthcare .
How often is the measure updated/calculated? Quarterly and Semi Annually
What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of Personnel with Housing, Quartering, Educational Assistance, Healthcare
How is the measure calculated?
HOUSING= Total Nr of Personnel provided with housing by the PNP X 100 Total Nr PRO3 Personnel without house and Lot EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE = Total Nr of Scholars X 100 Total Nr of entitled dependents Quartering = Total Nr of Personnel occupying Gov’t Quarters X 100 Total Nr PRO3 Personnel without house and Lot
Health Care = No. of PRO 3 PNP Personnel who availed of RHE X 100 Total Nr of PRO Personnel
Is the information about measure available? Housing - Yes, currently available Educational Assistance - Yes, currently available Quartering - Yes, currently available RHE - Yes, currently available
Who is the responsible for Setting the Targets? RPHRDD
Who is accountable for targets? RPHRDDWho is Responsible for tracking and reporting the targets? RPHRDD
BASELINETARGET
2010 2011 2013 2016
Housing 3% 6% 9% 12%Quartering 5% 10% 15% 20%Educational Assistance
62.5% 100% 100% 100%
Healthcare1.5%
1.75%
2.78%
4.33%
P
What data is required in calculating the measure? Nr. of PNP Personnel provided with house and Lot., Nr of personnel without house and lot, Nr. of PNP Personnel who were KIA. Nr of entitled dependents of all KIA personnel, Nr of Personnel occupying Gov’t Quarters, No. of PRO 3 PNP Personnel who availed of RHE, and No of PRO3 Personnel Reported Confined and Discharged from Confinement
Where /How is it acquired? Reports from RPHRDD, RESPO, RLRDD, RHS3
UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011
Percentage of policies implemented
Objective: Ensure an enabling environment for Organizational Development
Rationale: Determine whether all of the policies are implemented.
How often is the measure updated/calculated? Quarterly and Annual Basis
What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of policies implemented
How is the measure calculated? Total Nr of Policies in the organization Actual number of policies implemented
What data is required in calculating the measure? List of Existing Policies and Action taken / reports from units on their implementation of policies.
Where /How is it acquired (specify document/or person) Reports from RHQs/PPOs/ CPOs/3rd RPSB
Is the information about measure available? Yes, currently available
Who is the responsible for Setting the Targets? RHQs/PPOs/ CPOs/3rd RPSB
Who is accountable for targets? RHQs/PPOs/ CPOs/3rd RPSB
Who is Responsible for tracking and reporting the targets? RHQs/PPOs/ CPOs/3rd RPSB
BASELINE TARGET
2010 2011 2013 2016
100% 100% 100% 100%
X 100( )
UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011Q
Percentage of required audits conducted
R
Note: Computation of PS312,120,355.45 x 100 = 100%312,120,355.45
Computation of CO3,729,000 – 559,350 = 85% 3,729,000
Objective: Ensure transparency and accountability in all financial and logistical transactions
Rationale: To optimize the proper utilization of funds and management of logistical resources
Is information about the measure available? Currently available
Who is responsible for setting targets? D-Staff
Who is accountable for targets? D-Staff
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RCD
How are the units of measures used? MOOE = Report of utilization Personal Services = Report of Disbursement Capital Outlay = Inventory reports of plants, properties and equipment
What data are required in calculating the measures? Where/how are they acquired? MOOE = RAOMO (Registry of Allotment & Obligation on MOOE) Personal Services = RAOPS (Registry Allotment & Obligation on Personal Services) Capital Outlay = RAOCO (Registry Allotment & Obligation on Capital Outlay)
How are the measures calculated?MOOE: 15 % 85% schemePersonal Services: NCA received x 100 Fund released Capital Outlay: Fund Released - NCA Received Fund Utilization
BASELINE TARGET
2010 2011 2013 2016
MOOE = 100%
Personal Services=100%
Capital Outlay=100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011
PRO3 Resolution Rate of complaints on CORRUPTION
S
Objective: Ensure transparency and accountability in all financial and logistical transactions
Rationale: This will determine PRO3 Resolution Rate of complaints on corruption .
Is information about the measure available? Still to be formulated
Who is responsible for setting targets? RCD
Who is accountable for targets? RCD
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RCD
BASELINE TARGET
2010 2011 2013 2016
Zero complaint
100% 100% 100%How is the measures calculated?
No. of complaints – No. Of unresolved X 100 No. of complaints
How often is the measure updated / calculated? Monthly
What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of resolved cases on corruption
What data is required in calculating the measure? Where/how is it required? Monthly Report s submitted by PPOs and CPOs
UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011
Fund Utilization Efficiency Distribution Scheme 15% - 85% (PROs/Field Units)
T
Objective: Optimize utilization of financial and logistical resources to support administrative, operational and other priority programs of the PNP
Rationale: This will put the operations of the PNP within the context of a well defined, integrated and synchronized planning and budgeting
Is information about the measure available? Currently available
Who is responsible for setting targets? Program Directors (D-Staff)
Who is accountable for targets? Program Directors (D-Staff)
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? All D-Staff, PROs, DILG/NAPOLCOM, COA, DBM & NEDA
BASELINE TARGET
2010 2011 2013 2016
100% 100% 100% 100%
How is the measures calculated? Per capita = Programmable amount No. of personnel
How often is the measure updated / calculated? Monthly
What is the unit of measure used? Sub-allotments issued to Program Directors (D-Staff)
What data is required in calculating the measure? Where/how is it required? Registry allotment of MOOE
UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011
Objective: To optimize utilization of financial and logistical resources to support administrative, operational and other priority programs of PRO3
Rationale: An antiquated and dilapidated building for police stations and PNP equipments put the lives of our personnel in danger and continually undermines the capability of the PNP to combat crime efficiently and effectively. How often is the measure updated / calculated?
Quarterly
What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of serviceable police equipments
How is the measure calculated? Police stations owned and constructed:
X + Y X 100 = % of PS in good conditions ZX – Total Nr. of PS presently in good condition (Repaired/renovated and newly constructed)Y – Nr. of PS for the year (Repaired/renovated and newly constructed)Z – Total Nr. of PS region wide
Mobility: No. of serviceable vehicles X 100 Total no. of issued vehicles
Firearms: No. of serviceable firearms X 100 Total no. of issued firearms
Inves Eqmt: No. of serviceable Inves Eqmt X 100 Total no. of issued Inves Eqmt
Commo Eqmt: No. of serviceable Commo Eqmt X 100 Total no. of issued Commo Eqmt
What data is required in calculating the measure? Where/How is it acquired?
Data on status of police station buildings renovated and the status of PNP equipment regionwide which can be obtained from the quarterly inventory reports submitted by the PPOs/CPOs.
Who is responsible for setting targets? ORLRDD Who is accountable for targets? ORLRDD Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? ORLRDD
Maintenance Management System
U
Is information about the measure available? Available with minor changes
UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011
Baseline Data of Maintenance Management System
BASELINE TARGET 2010 2011 2013 2016Police Station 31% 38% 50% 66%Firearms : 92% 93% 95% 98%Mobility 87% 88% 90% 93%Investigative Equipment 90% 91% 93% 96%Communications 87% 89% 93% 98%
Note:Police Station :As of 2009 PRO3 has 43 total no. of Police Station owned and constructed vis-a-vis the 128 total no. of Police Station in the region.Targets indicated above are based on the submitted 15 years program for the construction of Police Station Buildings of the Regional Engineering office3 to TDL dated June 21, 2009.Completion of the targets indicated therein will depend upon the release of funds from the National Headquarters.
Firearms:To attain the 1 is to 1 ratio issuance of short firearms to PNP personnel.Filled-up of long firearms by 50% of all Police Stations and 100% on RPSB/PPSC/CPSC.Attainment of the targets indicated therein will depend upon the issuances of firearms from the National Headquarters.
Mobility:Attainment of the targets indicated therein will depend upon the issuances of mobility from the National Headquarters.All Police Station will have at least 2 patrol cars/jeeps and 2 motorcycles
Investigative Equipment:Every Police station shall have investigative equipments which contains finger print kit, tape recorder, security line, finger print card and camera.
UI UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011
Communications equipment
The table represents the parameters needed for a unit(PRO,PPO,CPO.MPS) to be considered filled-up according to its classification whether type A,B or C . At present the region has total 1590 hand held radio, 228 base radio and 209 mobile radios with general average of 39.27 % filled-up.
UNIT TYPE Authorized Requirement
Hand Held
BASE MOBILE
PRO3 A 20 5 3
3RD RPSB C 20 2 3
A 20 2 3
B 16 1 2
C 9 1 1
CPOs
A 21 2 3
B 16 1 2
C 9 1 1
MPs
A 16 2 3
B 9 1 1
C 5 1 0
PPSC
A 10 2 3
B
U2 UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011
Percentage of LGU whose support to PPOs/CPOs is institutionalized with POCs
V
Objective: Attain financial and logistical adequacy consistent with law
Rationale: To institutionalize the support of the LGU in anti-criminal campaign of the PPOs/CPOs
Is information about the measure available? Available with minor changes
Who is responsible for setting targets? RCD/ROPD
Who is accountable for targets? RCD/ROPD
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RCD/ROPD
BASELINETARGET
2010 2011 2013 2016
82% 85% 90% 95%
How is the measure calculated? Program Review and Analysis
Total No. of unit (PPOs/CPOs and MPS/CPS) with support of POC / Total No. of unit (PPOs/CPOs and MPS/CPS) X 100
How often is the measure updated / calculated? Semi-Annually
What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of LGU’s support to PPOs and CPOs
What data is required in calculating the measure? Where/how is it required? Reports submitted by PPOs and CPOs
UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011
W
Percentage of LGUs & LCEs with sustained initiatives for safer communities with the PNP (Percentage of Barangays with BPATs Organized and Mobilized)
Objective: Achieving excellence in performing the Integrated “QUAD +” Operations.
Rationale: This would indicate the extent of the nationwide implementation of LOI Bayanihan.
How is the measure calculated? Number of Barangays with BPATs established divided by the total number of barangays, especially in CT-cleared areas multiplied by 100
Is the information about the measure available? Available with minor changes
When will this information be available? As soon as regular updates are done
Who is responsible for setting targets? RPCRD
Who is accountable for targets? RPCRD
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RPCRD
How often is the measure updated/calculated? Monthly
What is the unit of measure used? By the number of barangays where BPATs are established.
What data is required in calculating the measure? Where/ How is it required? Number of BPATs mobilized and the names of supervisors. Data are acquired through reports submitted through mail, e-mail or fax
BASELINE TARGET
2010
95% or
2,934(BPATs
Organized)
2011
98%
2013
100%
2016
100%
UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011
Objective:
Sustainable partnership and collaboration with the stakeholders.
Rationale:
Holistic approach in addressing crimes involving the participation of LGUs.
How often is the measure updated? Yearly updated
How is the measure calculated? Percentage Total Score Gathered from Points Allocated
% of PS with ACAP = # of Pol Stn with ACAP X 100 total # of Pol Station
What data is required in calculating the measure? Where/How is it acquired? ACAP of MPS/CPS
Is information about the measure available? Available with minor changes
When will this information be available? As submitted by CPS/MPS
Who is responsible for setting targets? ROPD
Who is accountable for targets? ROPD
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? ROPD
BASELINE 2010
42%
TARGET2011
100% 2013100%
2016100%
Percentage of Police Stations w/ LGU’s Anti-Criminality Action Plan
X UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011
Objective:
Sustainable partnership and collaboration with the stakeholders through public information campaign.
Rationale:
To gain the support of stakeholders as partners for a genuine transformation in the PNP.
How often is the measure updated?
Monthly basis.
How is the measure calculated?
Total number of ITP lectures conducted
What data is required in calculating the measure? Where/How is it acquired? Number of sustained ITP lectures/Information campaign
Is information about the measure available? Yes
When will this information be available? As submitted by PPOs and CPOs
Who is responsible for setting targets? RPCRD
Who is accountable for targets? RPCRD
Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RPCRD
BASELINE
151 (InfoCam-Paign)
TARGET
20111 info
Campaign/month/station
20131 info
campaign/month
/station
20161 info
campaign/month/station
Number of sustained ITP initiatives undertaken with interest group.
Y UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011
Z
Objective: Sustain public information and dialogue with the stakeholders and other pillars of CJS
Rationale: The number of interactions would indicate a sustained public information and dialogue. This would also indicate the effects of Information Operations efforts of the PNP.
How is the measure calculated? Summation of the interactions with other pillars of CJS conducted /initiated by various PNP offices/units.
Is the information about the measure available? Current Available
When will this information be available? Available after monthly consolidation of reports.
Who is responsible for setting targets? RPCRDWho is accountable for targets? RPCRDWho is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RPCRD
Number of regular interactions with other pillars of CJS
How often is the measure updated/calculated? MonthlyWhat is the unit of measure used? Number of interactions conducted.
What data is required in calculating the measure? Where/How is it required? Summation of the number of ugnayans, dialogues conducted and information operations media lines crafted. Available through reports submitted via e-mail or fax.
BASELINE TARGET
2010
1/month/ station/office
(100%)6,720- activities
2011
1/month/ station/office
2013
1/month/ station/office
2016
1/month/ station/office
UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011
Recommended