View
253
Download
3
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
PJM©20091PJM DOCs #
Frequency Response Drafting Team
• Frequency Response Background• Frequency Response Standard History• Briefing on Frequency Response Meeting (8/28)• Data Request• Next Steps
1
PJM©20092PJM DOCs #
History
• Resources Subcommittee (RS) has been tracking frequency response with help of ad hoc “spotters” for several years
• Based on concern on trends, RS posted a draft of the FRS in 2001 with a revised Policy 1
• SAR posted in 2002 • Submitted an alternative Common Balancing Data SAR • Whitepaper prepared and SAR posted in 2005, 2006, 2007
2
PJM©20093PJM DOCs #
PJM©20094PJM DOCs #
4
Frequency Response Basics
• Frequency Response, termed beta (β), is– a fundamental reliability service– a combination of governor and load response
• Following a sudden generator (or load loss)– β stabilizes frequency at a new point– Frequency does not return to 60 Hz until the contingent Balancing Authority replaces
the loss • There is confusion on the requirements of BAL-003
– Some believe there is a minimum required β in the standard– The Resources Subcommittee (author of the standard and its predecessor) disagrees
• FERC Order No. 693 directs improved calculation and determination of need for a performance obligation
PJM©20095PJM DOCs #
Classifications - Time Frame - Measures
PJM©20096PJM DOCs #
Excursion Recovery
A = 60.000
C = 59.812
B = 59.874
59.750
59.775
59.800
59.825
59.850
59.875
59.900
59.925
59.950
59.975
60.000
60.025
60.050
-30 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420
Time (Seconds)
Frequency (Hz)
Recovery Completed, TV
PJM©20097PJM DOCs #
Interconnections Depicted on same Axis
PJM©20098PJM DOCs #
Frequency response is always the same through out the year or is it?
PJM©20099PJM DOCs #
How to use differing scan rate supplied values to apply a standard technique
PJM©200910PJM DOCs #
Standardized calculation method of frequency response
PJM©200911PJM DOCs #
ERCOT MethodDate/Time MW Loss MW/0.1 Hz MW/0.1 Hz MW/0.1 Hz
Point B Point B+30 FRSSDT10/23/07 19:24 612.2 580.2 398.2 637.5
10/29/07 9:50 587.5 595.0 614.0 580.911/2/07 9:17 624.2 624.2 1047.0 828.9
11/13/07 16:19 583.0 612.9 633.1 537.611/23/07 17:26 633.0 469.2 381.8 382.1
11/29/07 6:35 343.5 489.6 379.6 316.812/5/07 10:45 343.5 1054.3 835.5 774.6
12/10/07 11:23 521.6 614.0 687.8 684.012/12/07 1:48 1026.5 453.5 420.9 537.012/19/07 8:51 656.9 547.4 581.3 517.7
1/20/08 8:39 326.9 294.1 320.6 276.82/3/08 15:23 781.9 555.0 503.1 548.2
2/8/08 5:03 472.4 1368.8 1861.7 1268.22/19/08 3:05 723.9 580.6 580.6 551.0
2/20/08 22:59 384.1 843.2 1084.0 824.93/3/08 10:08 497.1 474.6 554.6 448.2
3/4/08 4:14 549.5 599.7 519.0 471.73/9/08 20:30 530.9 557.9 504.2 541.73/13/08 9:16 559.3 642.8 625.3 654.6
3/16/08 11:37 570.0 508.9 703.7 578.53/30/08 8:33 501.2 359.2 342.9 348.8
4/3/08 9:24 740.3 650.2 637.6 783.94/10/08 3:47 1078.4 560.6 695.3 632.0
4/17/08 13:26 552.3 582.5 928.1 674.54/23/08 13:08 587.0 745.6 953.3 675.94/24/08 10:13 557.5 775.1 928.6 747.9
5/26/08 2:36 552.3 489.2 629.8 517.36/22/08 18:29 564.3 930.1 1431.0 1392.76/24/08 16:48 530.0 815.4 868.9 679.9
Average 633.6 712.1 634.9
ERCOT experience using the FRSSDT method – similar outcome on response
PJM©200912PJM DOCs #
Comparing March 2009 vs November 2008 profile of frequency in 5 mHz bins
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
Mar-09Nov-08
PJM©200913PJM DOCs #
Comparing April 2009 vs November 2008 profile of frequency in 5 mHz bins
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
Apr-09Nov-08
ERCOT Frequency Profile – Nov 2008 – 4 base load super critical units providing governor support @ +/- 1 rpm – on outage in April
PJM©200914PJM DOCs #
RS/FRSDT (Sept 09)
• Seek OC Concurrence to Pilot Voluntary Data Collection– Utilize annual 2010 Bias calculation as “Phase 1” – Utilize ACE data for centralized verification calculation –(pilot with voluntary data from
BRDSDT already provided) *– Support web-based reporting tool for unit trip data *
• Seek Standards Committee endorsement• Draft Formal Scope for Phase 2 (generator level data for low responders) for OC
consideration in 1st quarter 2010• Frequency Response Reference Document by December 2009• Refine data requirements based on Phase 1 data submissions• Report on need for Section 1600 Request to OC March 2010 • If needed, mandatory collection would begin July 1, 2010
14
* May require some development expenditures
PJM©200915PJM DOCs #
• Background
• Three levels of data needed in this process:• Interconnection• Benchmark Trends• Validate net BA performance• Balancing Authority• Sound Bias calculation• Identify areas and reasons for lower response• Generator • For BAs with lower response•
PJM©200916PJM DOCs #
•Goals of Voluntary Data Collection
•Provide valid data for FRS drafting team
•Minimize impact on entities providing data
•Simple as possible
•Ride on existing processes
PJM©200917PJM DOCs #
BalancingAuthorities
RS Frequency Task Force
Define pointsA, B and selectEvents for analysis
Step 1:Enter events
750 MW – EI & WI500 MW ERCOT
(monthly)
NERC-FMA1-Second
FrequencyPhasor Data
CERTS
Step 2:Call
Survey
NERC Central site
Monthly EventCollection
VOLUNTARY FRRSDT EVENT DATA REQUEST – INTERIM AND TARGET PROCESSES
Rev:11.23.09
InterimProcess
TargetProcess
PJM©200918PJM DOCs #
Phase 1 Data Collection (2010)Interconnection Benchmarking
U0 code created in GADS to capture unit trip dataUse Quarterly DCS report to gather unit trips > 750 MW (current reporting
threshold is 1000MWMinor change to CERTS Frequency Monitoring application to
automatically create an event database Balancing Authority Data
Use annual bias calculation spreadsheet (calculation already required, BAs have been provided a tool to do this for 2010 bias calculation)
Implement a tool that calculates frequency response from monthly data that is already collected for the Reliability-Based Control standard
Implement a minor change to the CERTS Frequency Monitoring Application that calculates BA frequency response from ICCP ACE data already streamed to NERC Supporting ToolsFRSDT and RS develop and post tools that BAs can use to analyze their performance and that of their generators.
This is a field trial for tools that may be implemented in 2011Modified based on comments in the FRS drafting team effort
PJM©200919PJM DOCs #
BalancingAuthorities
RS Frequency Task Force
Define pointsA, B, and C
Step 2 Call SurveySelect Events within a quarter NERC-FMA
1-Second Frequency
Phasor Data
CERTS
Call Survey
Central site
SurveyCollection &Calculations
FRSDT
EventAnalysis
Reports
VOLUNTARY FRRSDT DATA REQUEST – INTERIM AND TARGET PROCESSESRev:11.23.09
InterimProcess
Respond Survey – scan rate data
Survey count should be selecting approximately 3 per month
NERC Central site
Monthly EventCollection
PJM©200920PJM DOCs #
1) Governor droop setting. (5%, 4% or other)2) Governor deadband setting. (Expressed in Hz, 0.035 Hz, 0.017 Hz etc.)3) Pmax MW of the Resource, both nameplate and during the event.4) Type of resource, combustion turbine, steam turbine or other.5) AGC scan rate data of grid frequency, MW output of the Resource and for steam turbines, supply steam pressure at rated output and at the time of the event. This can be scan rate data or a curve within the spreadsheet .
Draft Formal Scope for Phase 2 (generator level data for low responders) for OC consideration by first quarter of 2010
Consideration of detail on low performing BAs – detail level -
PJM©2009PJM DOCs #
Performance is based on the calculator that is part of FRS Form 1. The example in Table 1 below shows the calculation for a Balancing Authority with a -1000MW/0.1Hz Frequency Response, that has identified a 1200MW unit as its MSSC, and operates in an area where the first step of firm UFLS is at 59.95 Hz. The calculator assumes a Time Error Correction is in effect.
The calculator is based on the concept that the Balancing Authority is forced to operate as an independent island (such as during restoration) and is still able to withstand credible contingencies.
Starting Frequency 59.98 HzHighest UFLS 59.50 HzFrequency Safety Margin 0.48 HzFrequency Response (Beta) -1000 MW/0.1HzTriggering Event (Causes UFLS) 4800 MWMSSC 1200 MWSafety Margin 3600 MW# of MSSC required to trigger UFLS 4.0
T a b l e 1 E x a m p l e C a l c u l a t o r
T h e t w o c o l u m n s i n t h e F r e q u e n c y R e s p o n s e R i s k L e v e l ( F R R L ) t a b l e a c c o u n t s f o r t h e f a c t r i s k i s l o w e r f o r m u l t i - B a l a n c i n g A u t h o r i t y i n t e r c o n n e c t i o n s f o r t h e s a m e c o n t i n g e n c y . T h i s i s b e c a u s e a l l B a l a n c i n g A u t h o r i t i e s i n a n i n t e r c o n n e c t i o n w i l l c o n t r i b u t e t o c o n t i n g e n c i e s a n y w h e r e i n t h e i n t e r c o n n e c t i o n .
T h e F r e q u e n c y R e s p o n s e R i s k L e v e l i s r e p o r t e d a n n u a l l y a s p a r t o f F R S F o r m 1 . B a l a n c i n g A u t h o r i t i e s w i t h a F R R L > 0 w i l l c a l c u l a t e a n d r e p o r t t h e i r 1 2 m o n t h r o l l i n g a v e r a g e F r e q u e n c y R e s p o n s e e a c h q u a r t e r . C o m p l i a n c e w i l l b e a s s e s s e d e a c h q u a r t e r t h e r e a f t e r u n t i l F R R L = 0 .
Case Frequency Response Risk Level
Cases below are calculated based on BA or RSG operating as an island. See calculator in Appendix 1
Single BA or RSG Interconnection
Multi BA or RSG Interconnection
Performance Based proposal
PJM©200922PJM DOCs #
Cases below are calculated based on BA or RSG operating as an island. See calculator in Appendix 1
Single BA or RSG Interconnection
Multi BA or RSG Interconnection
Event 2x MSSC will initiate firm UFLS
0 0
Event 1.5x MSSC will initiate firm UFLS
1 0
Event = MSSC will initiate firm UFLS
2 1
Event = MSSC will initiate UFLS > 10 % of firm demand
3 2
Mitigation Successfully Applied
Decrement Risk Level by 1 Decrement Risk Level by 1
Table 1 Frequency Response Risk Level Table
Recommended