Pollution Controls and Available Monitoring Techniques ·  · 2016-04-14Pollution Controls and...

Pollution Controls and Available Monitoring Techniques

A quick summary of various control measures and important monitoring characteristics

Peter Westlin, EPA, OAQPS

Topic areas

THC and OHAP Adsorbers Thermal Oxidizers Catalytic Oxidizers Condensers Capture Systems

PM ESP Fabric Filter Venturi Scrubber

Acid Gases Wet scrubbers Dry Injection Mercury

NOx Selective Catalytic Reduction NSCR Water Injection Low Nox Burners

Other Sulfur in Coal & Oil Coatings and Solvents Design Specs Process Operations

2

THC/OHAP Control Techniques – Carbon Adsorber

Some gas molecules will stick to the surface of some solids

Activated carbon often used for THC/OHAP control Has a strong attraction for organic and non-polar

compounds Has a large capacity for adsorption (many pores,

lots of surface area) Is cheap

Silica gel, activated alumina, and zeolites are also used

3

THC/OHAP Control Techniques – Carbon Adsorber

Three types – fixed bed (most common), moving bed, and fluidized bed

Typically appear in pairs – one adsorbing while other desorbs

Used for material recovery as well as emissions control

Regenerated via steam, hot gas, or vacuum

4

5

Carbon Adsorber – Fixed Bed Examples

6

THC/OHAP Control Techniques – Carbon Adsorber

Compliance monitoring Outlet THC or compound specific concentration

(CEMS) Parametric and other monitoring

Regeneration cycle timing (e.g., minutes), steam flow, or vacuum profile (e.g., delta P for x minutes) Initial performance tests for confirmationPeriodic testing

Carbon bed activity (e.g., quarterly)

7

THC/OHAP Control Techniques –Thermal Oxidizers

General description Waste gas combusted with or without auxiliary fuel to

carbon dioxide and water Operating temperatures between 800 and 2000°F Good combustion requires (remember chemistry

class?) Adequate temperature Sufficient oxygen Turbulent mixing Sufficient residence time

8

THC/OHAP Control Techniques –Thermal Oxidizers

Two basic types – thermal oxidizer (TO) and regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO)

After construction, process control limited to temperature and oxygen (air to fuel ratio) concentration

Waste gas has to be heated to autoignition temperature Typically requires auxiliary fuel Can be enhanced with heat recovery exchangers

9

THC/OHAP Control TechniquesTOs and RTOs

10

THC/OHAP control - RTO

11

THC/OHAP Control Techniques –Thermal Oxidizers

Compliance monitoringOutlet THC or compound-specific concentration

(CEMS) Parametric and other monitoring

Outlet CO concentration (CEMS) Correlated with test results

Combustion chamber temperatureCorrelated with test results

Periodic testing to confirm12

THC/OHAP Control Techniques –Catalytic Oxidizer

General descriptionConstruction similar to TO or RTO but

includes catalyst layer or bricksCatalyst causes combustion reactions to

occur faster and at lower temperatures (~ 650 to 1000°F)

Saves auxiliary fuel

13

Catalytic Oxidizer – Example Bricks

Regenerative catalyst oxidizer

14

THC/OHAP Control Techniques –Catalytic Oxidizer

Performance monitoring Outlet THC or compound-specific concentration (CEMS) Parametric and other monitoring

Catalyst bed inlet temperature or temperature rise across catalyst bed (if inlet concentration is constant) Correlated with test results Periodic catalyst activity tests (e.g., semi-annually)

Periodic testing NOT outlet CO concentration (CO preferentially

combusted in THC catalysts)15

THC/OHAP Control Techniques -Condenser

General description Gas or vapor liquefied and removed from gas

stream via Lowering temperature or Increasing pressure

Used to collect and reuse organic materials (e.g., solvents)

Used as pretreatment to reduce volumes

16

THC/OHAP Control Techniques -Condenser

Two structural types – contact and surface condensers No secondary pollutants from surface type More coolant needed for contact type

Chilled water, brines, and CFCs used as coolants

Efficiencies range from 50 to 95 percent

17

THC/OHAP Control Techniques –Surface Condenser

18

THC/OHAP Control Techniques -Condenser

Compliance monitoring Outlet THC or compound-specific concentration

(CEMS) Predict emissions via equilibrium calculations (e.g.,

organic chemical MACT) Parametric and other monitoring

Outlet gas temperature (e.g., at or below dew point) Correlated with testing or with equilibrium calculations

Coolant inlet/outlet temperature Correlated with testing

Periodic testing19

THC/OHAP Control Techniques –Capture Systems

General description Two types of systems

Enclosures and local exhausts (hoods) Two types of enclosures

Permanent total (M204 definition) – 100% capture efficiency

Nontotal or partial – must measure capture efficiency via Method 204

Total THC control efficiency is product of capture and control device efficiencies

20

THC/OHAP Control Techniques –Capture System

21

THC/OHAP Control Techniques –Capture Systems

Compliance monitoring (parametric) Permanent total enclosures

Differential pressure (e.g., < -0.007 in. H2O) Daily inspections

Local capture (design and work practice) Conduct visible and portable analyzer leak checks Set spacing above process Monitor exhaust flow rate/differential pressure in

duct near hood

22

Take-aways about THC/OHAP control device monitoring:

What can we say about CEMS for monitoring gaseous organic emissions?

If not CEMS, which operating parameters are appropriate for monitoring compliance for Adsorbers? Thermal oxidizers? Catalytic oxidizers? Capture systems?

23

PM Control Techniques –Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP)

General Description Charged particles are attracted to grounded plates

and removed from exhaust gas Two types

Dry type use mechanical action to clean plates Wet type use water to prequench and to rinse plates

(good for removing condensable PM) High voltages Often with multiple sections (fields) Efficiencies up to 99+ percent with multiple sections

24

PM Control Techniques - ESP

Gas FlowInto Paper

DWG. No.

TITLE:

Drawing Scale

CHKED BY DATE

DRWN BY DATE

APVD BY DATE

REV(THIS DRAWING IS CAD GENERATED)

480VSupply

T/R set H-VSecondary

25

PM Control Techniques – ESP

Compliance monitoringOutlet PM concentration (PM CEMS) Parametric and other monitoring

Opacity and secondary power (current and voltage)Correlated with testing

Periodic testing EPRI model on TTN/EMC website

Comprehensive site-specific correlationMakes use of EPA ESP design model

26

PM Control Techniques – Fabric Filter (bag house)

General description Particles trapped on filter media and filter cake Either positive or negative pressure (push me, pull you) High efficiency for all particle sizes (> 99 percent) Frequent bag cleaning

Shaker (off-line) Reverse air (low pressure, long time, off line) Pulse jet (60 to 120 psi air, on line) Sonic horn (150 to 550 Hz @ 120 to 140 dB, on line)

27

PM Control Techniques – Fabric Filter - Schematic

28

PM Control Techniques – Fabric Filter

Compliance monitoringOutlet PM concentration (PM CEMS)

Works for negative pressure FFs Not so good for positive pressure FFs

Parametric and other monitoring Bag leak detectors (very good choice) Outlet opacity (not so good choice) Pressure differential (bad choice) Periodic inspections Periodic testing

29

PM Control Techniques – Wet Venturi Scrubber

Capture of particles in liquids through inertial impaction (less effective at removing gases)

High energy (velocity through Venturi throat) with pressure drops >20 in. H2O

Can be fixed or adjustable throatsRequire exhaust stream mist separators Less efficient than FF or ESP (90-98 percent)

30

PM Control Techniques – Wet Venturi Scrubber

31

PM Control Techniques – Wet Venturi Scrubber

Compliance monitoring Outlet PM concentration (extractive PM CEMS can

work) Not COMS (water vapor interference) Parametric and other monitoring

Pressure differential AND liquid flow rateCorrelated with performance testingPeriodic inspections

Periodic testing

32

Take-aways about PM control device monitoring:

What can we say about CEMS for monitoring PM emissions?

What about ESPs and Venturi scrubbers distinguishes them from fabric filters?

If not CEMS, which operating parameters are appropriate for monitoring compliance for ESPs? Venturi scrubbers? Fabric filters?

33

Acid gas control – wet flue gas scrubbers

General description Acid gases mix with wet alkaline slurries

sprayed in packed or plate/tray towers Lime, limestone, and sodium bicarbonate often

used as sorbents Typical efficiencies on the order of >98 percent

34

Acid gas scrubbers

35

Compliance monitoring Acid gas (e.g., SO2, HCl) concentration

(CEMS) Parametric and other monitoring

Slurry pH AND liquid flow rateCorrelated with testingPeriodic inspections (check packing)Not pressure drop or flow rate

Periodic testing

Acid gas scrubbers

36

Acid Gas and Hg Control Techniques – Dry Injection

General description Sorbent injected into process Sorbent reacts with gas to form salts that are

removed in a PM control device (fabric filter)Hydrated lime and sodium bicarbonate often

used as sorbents for acids Activated carbon used for Hg

37

Acid Gas and Mercury Control Techniques – Dry Injection

38

Dry injection control systems

Acid gas (e.g., SO2, HCl) concentration (CEMS)

Hg CEMS or sorbent trap Parametric and other monitoring

Adsorbent injection rateCorrelated with testing

PM control device monitoring Periodic testing

39

Take-aways about acid gas and Hg control device monitoring:

What can we say about CEMS for monitoring acid gas or Hg emissions?

What about acid gas scrubbers distinguishes them from and Venturi scrubbers?

If not CEMS, which operating parameters are appropriate for monitoring compliance for Acid gas scrubbers? Dry injection?

40

NOx Control Techniques –Selective Catalytic Reduction

General description Ammonia or urea is injected into exhaust

streams with plenty of oxygen to reduce NOxto N2 and water

Catalysts made from base and precious metals and zeolites

Operating temperatures range from 600 to 1100°F

Efficiency ranges from 70 to 90 percent

41

NOx Control Techniques – SCR Schematic

42

NOx Control Techniques –Selective Catalytic Reduction

Compliance monitoringOutlet nitrogen oxide concentration

(CEMS) Parametric monitoring

Ammonia / urea injection rateCorrelated to testing

Catalyst activity Initial and periodic testing

43

NOx Control Techniques – Non Selective Catalytic Reduction

General description Low oxygen exhaust gas transforms via

catalytic reaction to form water, CO2, and N2(commonly applied to engines)

Catalysts made from noble metalsOperating temperatures range from 700 to

1500°F Efficiency ranges from 80 to 90 percent

44

NOx Control - NSCR

Oxidation catalyst

45

NOx Control Techniques – Non Selective Catalytic Reduction

Compliance monitoringOutlet nitrogen oxide concentration

(CEMS) Parametric monitoring

Catalyst bed inlet temperature Catalyst activity (replacement)

Periodic testing, portable analyzers

46

NOx Control Techniques – Water or Steam Injection

General description Water or steam injected in combustion zone

reduces temperature and nitrogen oxide formation (applied to gas turbines)

Only thermal nitrogen oxides reduced Reductions range from 60 to 80 percent

47

NOx Control Techniques – Water or Steam Injection - Schematic

48

NOx Control Techniques – Water or Steam Injection

Compliance monitoringOutlet nitrogen oxide concentration (CEMS) Parametric monitoring

Water to fuel ratioCorrelated to testing

Fuel bound nitrogen concentration (low priority) Periodic performance testing

49

NOx control – Low-NOxburners

Designed to control fuel and air mixing at the burner Staged combustion in a larger flame Reduced O2 at hottest part of flame Reduced overall flame temperature Complete combustion in third stage

Often used with flue gas recirculationNOx reductions of ~75 percent possible

50

Low NOx burner

51

NOx control – Low-NOxburners

Performance monitoringNOx concentration (CEMS) Parametric monitoring

Periodic testing and inspections Inspection and maintenance

Daily - flame failure detector, A/F recordingsWeekly - igniter and burner operationMonthly - fan, fuel safety shutoff, interlocks, fuel

pressureAnnually – system-wide, instrument calibration

52

Take-aways about NOx control device monitoring:

What can we say about CEMS for monitoring NOx emissions?

If not CEMS, which operating parameters are appropriate for monitoring compliance for Water or steam injection? Low NOx burners

53

Monitoring raw material or fuel pollutant content limits

Sulfur in coal or oil ASTM fuel analysis per lot of fuel – S, heat content Monthly records of fuel use – tons, barrels Calculate emissions rate

THC/OHAP in coatings or solvents Method 24 analysis of each coating or solvent

(may be from vendor) Monthly records of use Calculate emissions or verify compliance

54

Monitoring work practices or design specifications

Work practice for dust control or liquid spillage Describe practices (e.g., sweep road, water spray, remove

spillage, contain waste) and frequencies Define inspection frequencies Record inspections, maintain logs

Maintain design criteria (e.g., seals on floating roofs) Describe inspections and measurements with frequencies

(e.g., annual rim seal checks, weekly visual inspections) Record results and maintain logs

55

Monitoring process operations (no add-on controls)

Chemical processes (THC/OHAP emissions) Periodic emissions testing

Annual performance test Quarterly portable analyzer checks

Process parameter monitoring Temperature on condenser Flow rates

Equipment integrity inspections LDAR Capture fans and shrouds Suppression or spraying equipment

56

Monitoring process operations (no add-on controls)

Combustion practices for PM control Periodic emissions testing - may tier testing frequency to

margin of compliance, for example Annual if ER > 90 % limit Two to three years if 60 < ER > 90 % Five years if ER < 60 %

Inspections and parameter monitoring Opacity (e.g., daily VE checks) A/F ratio Fuel or waste charge input rate Equipment (e.g., burners) inspections

57

Summation

THC/OHAP Control Techniques

PM Control Techniques Acid Gas Control TechniquesNOx Control Techniques Passive control measures

58

What do you want to talk about?

Multiclone PM collector

59

Thanks – we appreciate your time and attention!

Contact the Measurement Policy Group, SPPD, OAQPS early and often as you work on your source category rules

westlin.peter@epa.gov - 919-541-1058

60