View
119
Download
3
Category
Tags:
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Allison I. Fultz Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell LLP Washington, DC 2010 LEGAL AFFAIRS SEMINAR February 23, 2010. Positive Train Control. Overview. PTC Implementation – IMPORTANT DATES: January 15, 2010 – Final Rule issued March 16, 2010 – Final Rule goes into effect - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Positive Train Control
Allison I. Fultz
Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell LLP
Washington, DC
2010 LEGAL AFFAIRS SEMINAR
February 23, 2010
2
Overview
PTC Implementation – IMPORTANT DATES:
January 15, 2010 – Final Rule issued
March 16, 2010 – Final Rule goes into effect
April 16, 2010 – PTC Implementation Plan Deadline
December 31, 2015 – PTC Implementation Deadline
3
Overview
Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (RSIA)
• Mandates comprehensive operational and physical improvements
• Broadens power of USDOT/Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and Surface Transportation Board (STB)
Rulemaking to implement legislation is well underway – legislation sets out strict timetables
RSIA, Sec. 104: Positive Train Control (PTC) technology (49 U.S.C. § 20157)
4
Overview
Impetus for legislation -• Freight and passenger operations share track and
corridors• Precursors to current technology – 1920s–1960s• Recent technical advances• Recent incidents involving collision of passenger trains
with freight trains or interference with track
5
RSIA, Sec. 104 (codified at 49 U.S.C. § 20157)• Positive Train Control (PTC) is technology designed to
prevent collisions and other incidents by automatically detecting and controlling the movement of trains
• Definition (49 U.S.C. § 20157(i)(3)): a system designed to prevent train-to-train collisions, over-speed derailments, incursions into established work zone limits, and the movement of a train through a switch left in the wrong position
• Implementing regulations at 49 C.F.R. Parts 229, 234, 235 and 236
General
6
General
HOW IT WORKSKey components:• Equipment on locomotive cars
detects position and relation to other objects
• Equipment at control center – broadcasts authority for train movements
• Wayside interface units• Wireless data line between
train and control centerIllustration available at:www.volpe.dot.gov/safety/
crashavoid.html
7
General
When (49 U.S.C § 20157(a)(1); C.F.R. § 236.1005(b)(1)):• Progressively, according to PTCIP submitted by April 16,
2010• Complete implementation by December 31, 2015Who (49 U.S.C § 20157(a)(1)):• Class I freight carriers• Each railroad providing or hosting regularly scheduled
• Intercity passenger service (Amtrak)• Commuter passenger service
8
General
Where:• On each main line over which any quantity of poisonous
by inhalation (PIH) material is transported (49 U.S.C. § 20157(a)(1)(B); 49 C.F.R. § 236.1005(b)(i))
• On each main line used for regularly provided intercity or commuter passenger service, subject to limited exceptions
Main line definition: • Freight: a segment or route of railroad tracks over which
5 million or more gross tons of railroad traffic is transported annually (RSIA Sec. 104(i)(2), codified at 49 U.S.C. § 20157(i)(2))
• Passenger: all intercity and commuter passenger lines
9
General
Main line track exceptions• Only available to passenger intercity or commuter
passenger railroads, or freight railroads conducting joint passenger and freight operation over the same segment of track (49 C.F.R. § 1019(a))
• Specific segments of track may be designated as “not main line” (49 C.F.R. § 1019(a))
10
General
Regulatory progress:• DOT required to issue regulations governing PTC technology
(49 U.S.C. § 20157(g))• Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) - July 21, 2009 (74
Fed. Reg. 35950)• FRA public hearing on proposed rule - Aug. 13, 2009• Final rule - January 15, 2010 (75 Fed. Reg. 2598) – effective
March 16, 2010• FRA seeks further comment on specific issues DOT must
report to Congress by December 31, 2012 on progress of PTC implementation
11
General
Immediate next steps:• PTC Implementation Plan due to FRA no later than April 16,
2010• Must describe where and how railroad will install PTC
systems• Each railroad must –
• Define circumstances• Describe risks• Propose PTC elements
12
Technical Requirements
• Interoperability (49 U.S.C. § 20157(i)(1))• Address areas of greater risk prior to areas of lesser risk (49
U.S.C. § 20157(a)(2))• Once a railroad’s plan is approved, it must be phased in
progressively (49 C.F.R. § 236.1005(b)(1)) – not all at once, as close to Dec. 31, 2015 as possible
• Subparts A through G of 49 C.F.R. Part 236 continue to apply
13
Technical Requirements
Each PTC system must reliably and functionally prevent: (49 C.F.R. § 236.1005)• train-to-train collisions• overspeed derailments• incursions into established work zones• Movement of a train through a main line switch in the
improper position
14
Technical Requirements
PTC system requirements, cont’d (49 C.F.R. § 236.1005) – system must:
• Include safety-critical integration of all authorities and indications of a wayside or cab signal system
• Provide an appropriate warning or enforcement in response to authority or hazard detection
• Limit the speed of passenger trains to 59 mph and freight trains to 49 mph in areas without broken rail detection or equivalent safeguards
15
Technical Requirements
Submittals:• PTC Implementation Plan (PTCIP) (49 C.F.R. § 236.1011)• PTC Development Plan (PTCDP) and Type Approval (49
C.F.R. § 236.1013) - Components• PTC Safety Plan (PTCSP) (49 C.F.R. § 236.1015) –
Procedures• PTCDP and PTCSP need not be submitted simultaneously
with PTCIP• FRA may require independent third-party verification and
validation of product safety plan (49 C.F.R. § 236.1017; 49 C.F.R. § 236.913)
PTC applications – public docket (49 C.F.R. § 236.1011(e))
16
Technical Requirements
Host railroad (49 C.F.R. § 236.1003(b)Safe State/fail safe (49 C.F.R. § 236.1003(b))
17
PTC & Passenger Operations
Requirements• No new intercity or passenger rail service may commence
after Dec. 31, 2015, until a PTC system has been certified, installed and made operative (49 C.F.R. § 236.1005(b)(6))
18
PTC & Passenger Operations
Requirements, cont’d.Joint submission of PTCIP (49 C.F.R. § 236.1009(a)(3))• If host railroad is required to install and operate a PTC
system on a segment of its track; and • If tenant railroad that shares the same track segment would
have been required to install a PTC system if the host railroad had not otherwise been required to do so
Civil penalties may apply if freight and passenger operators fail to reach agreement on joint filing (49 C.F.R. Part 236, Appendix A)
19
PTC & Passenger Operations
Main Line Track Exceptions 49 C.F.R. § 236.1019
File main line track exclusion addendum (MTEA) to railroad’s PTCIP
• Passenger terminal exception (49 C.F.R. § 236.1019(b))• Limited operations exception (49 C.F.R. § 236.1019(c))
• FRA may grant exception where passenger and freight operations are temporally separated, among other criteria
20
Federal Preemption
49 C.F.R. § 236.0(i)(1) – Final rule preempts any state law, regulation, or order covering the same subject matter, except an additional or more stringent law, regulation or order that is
• necessary to eliminate or reduce an essentially local safety or security hazard;
• is not incompatible with a law, regulation or order of the United States Government and
• that does not impose an unreasonable burden on interstate commerce.
49 C.F.R. § 236.0(i)(2) – Final rule establishes a federal standard of care for railroad signal and train control systems
21
HSR & PTC
Intersection with high-speed rail (HSR) requirements (49 C.F.R. § 236.1007)):
• As of Dec. 31, 2015, the method of protecting HSR operations will be through the use of PTC. 49 CFR § 236.0(d)(2).• Defines high-speed operations as those exceeding 80
mph.• Specific requirements apply:
• Freight operation above 50 mph; passenger operation above 60 mph
• Freight or passenger operation above 90 mph• Freight or passenger operation above 125 mph• Freight or passenger operation above 150 mph
• Amtrak relief
22
Observations
• Effects of “the pressure of the time”• Solicitation of further comments – no timetable announced• FRA discretion
23
Implementation Costs
• FRA has estimated cost to freight railroads alone of implementing PTC at $2.3 – 5 billion
• Public policy decision (75 Fed. Reg. 2602)• No funding for PTC proposed in either House or Senate
version of transportation reauthorization.• FRA has determined - no direct compliance costs on state
and local governments (75 Fed. Reg. 2696)• Class I view - cost of PTC is weighted disproportionately
toward Class I carriers, with little impact on Class II and III railroads. (75 Fed. Reg. 2612)
24
Policy Collisions
• Freights – leverage• Public agencies – no funding source for PTC-related
improvements• No Congressional proposal for funding• Shared use of corridors by freight and passenger providers• Implementation of HSR on shared corridors
25
Practical Considerations
Shared use – presence of passenger service on joint use corridor will not absolutely trigger PTC
Dispute resolution• no mechanism in final rule – use STB non-binding mediation
and plug result in at FRA?
26
QUESTIONS?
Allison I. FultzCharles A. Spitulnik Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell LLPWashington, DC(202) 955-5600afultz@kaplankirsch.comwww.kaplankirsch.com
Recommended