View
215
Download
1
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
1
Safety
August 19-21, 2015
Minneapolis, MN
2015 Transmission & Distribution BenchmarkingCommunity Insights Conference
2
Looking for Best Practices
We wanted to find a way to identify best practices and initiatives in the safety area. One way to do that is to find out what the best performers are doing that other companies aren’t doing. So we needed to find out who are the best performers. We:
1) Gathered safety values on 5 major safety measures* for last 5 years
2) Focused on total T&D since we had the most data available
3) Ranked the 5-year average safety value using quartiles (3-year average for Motor Vehicle Accidents)
4) Calculated change in safety value over last 5 or 3 years (slope)
5) Assigned a score for quartile ranking and slope value
6) Calculated a total score for safety
* Measures included:• Recordable Incidence Rate• Lost Workday Case Rate• Lost Time Severity Rate• Days Away, Restricted or Transferred Rate• Motor Vehicle Accident Frequency
3
• Compares the 6-year average value to the 6-year change in value
Not Improving
Improving
Total T&D Recordable Incidence Rate
Safety RecordGood Poor
Companies want to have good performance and be either stable or improving – putting them in the lower left corner of the chart.
4
Total T&D Safety Ranking: total
TOTAL SCORE IMROVEMENT SCORE VALUE SCORE
Total w/o MVA Total w/MVA
Total w/o MVA Total w/MVA
Total w/o MVA Total w/MVA
Westar Energy 12 12 7 7 5 5
Exelon - ComEd 12 12 6 6 6 6
Tucson Electric Power 11 11 9 9 2 2
Oncor Electric Delivery 10 10 5 5 5 5
Exelon - PECO Energy 6 6 3 3 3 3
CenterPoint Energy 5 5 2 2 3 3
Exelon - BGE 4 4 4 4 0 0
CPS Energy 2 2 5 5 -3 -3
PSE&G -2 -2 -4 -4 2 2
KCP&L -2 -2 -1 -1 -1 -1
BC Hydro -5 -5 -3 -3 -2 -2
Austin Energy -11 -11 -6 -6 -5 -5
Best Performing companies: 22, 24, 27, 31
Putting the data together for the 5 measures, we calculated a total for each company. Westar had the highest total score – meaning that they had generally low safety rates and were improving.
Safety Profile
5
2014YE 2013YE Mean Q1 Q2 Q3 Bars Mean Q1 Q2 Q3 BarsT&D OSHA Recordable Injury Rate: Combined T&D 2.38 1.49 2.06 2.74 16 2.06 1.05 1.60 2.59 16OSHA Lost Workday Case Rate: Total T&D 0.82 0.30 0.63 0.96 16 0.75 0.23 0.66 0.98 16OSHA Lost Time Severity Rate: Total T&D 27.06 7.67 21.47 42.48 16 33.15 14.14 25.08 53.61 16OSHA DART Incidence Rate: T&D Total 1.59 0.46 1.30 1.71 16 1.52 0.59 1.10 1.49 16Distribution OSHA Recordable Injury Rate: Distribution Line 2.73 2.07 2.58 3.36 13 3.01 1.22 1.99 2.95 13OSHA Lost Workday Case Rate: Distribution line 0.74 0.30 0.71 0.95 13 0.88 0.27 0.74 1.23 13OSHA Lost Time Severity Rate: Distribution line 23.15 5.48 19.69 33.61 13 41.86 15.21 30.71 60.57 13OSHA DART Incidence Rate: Distribution line 1.53 0.45 1.31 1.95 13 1.78 0.85 1.43 1.59 13Substation OSHA Recordable Injury Rate: T&D Substations 3.14 0.95 1.76 3.35 12 1.57 0.23 1.03 1.29 12OSHA Lost Workday Case Rate: Substations 1.35 0.09 0.82 1.32 12 0.56 0.06 0.46 0.71 12OSHA Lost Time Severity Rate: Substations 41.16 0.55 12.21 60.89 12 19.73 0.43 3.83 19.11 12OSHA DART Incidence Rate: Substations 2.42 0.45 0.90 2.09 12 0.90 0.47 0.63 1.29 12Transmission OSHA Recordable Injury Rate: Transmission Line 2.32 0.00 1.18 4.75 9 1.34 0.59 0.85 1.89 9OSHA Lost Workday Case Rate: Transmission line 0.66 0.00 0.13 1.18 9 0.92 0.29 0.70 1.66 9OSHA Lost Time Severity Rate: Transmission line 38.97 0.00 15.03 38.82 9 30.57 4.08 16.31 44.75 9OSHA DART Incidence Rate: Transmission line 1.16 0.00 0.13 1.18 9 1.34 0.41 1.59 1.92 9
Note: Meter Readers not included
6
Recordable Incidence Rate
All quartiles and the mean are up this year after 4 years of consistent decline.
Mean 2.4Quartile 1 1.7Quartile 2: 2.1Quartile 3: 2.7
Safety pg 4: SF5 Safety pg 4: SF5
7
DART
1st Quartile continued to decline, but the other quartiles are up.
Mean 1.6Quartile 1 0.5Quartile 2: 1.3Quartile 3: 1.7
Safety pg 12: SF5 Safety pg 12: SF5
8
Severity Rate
All quartiles went down, but the trends aren’t consistent.
Mean 26.9Quartile 1 8.7Quartile 2: 22.0Quartile 3: 41.7
Safety pg 17: SF5 Safety pg 17: SF5
9
Lost Time Incidence Rate
There’s no consistent pattern for lost time incidences.
Mean 0.8Quartile 1 0.3Quartile 2: 0.7Quartile 3: 1.0
Safety pg 20: SF5 Safety pg 20: SF5
10
Leading Indicators Performance
Or bad?
Safety pg 60; SF117
So is having more leading indicators good…
Safety pg 60; SF117
11
Wellness Programs Offered 2014YE 2015YE
Total Respondents 15 14
Wellness/Health Risk assessment 100% 92.86%
Biometric screening 66.67% 57.14%
Stretching 80% 78.57%
Physical Therapists consultations or guidance on proper movement
46.67% 57.14%
Walking pushups strength training or other fitness programs
33.33% 57.14%
Health education and/or fitness advisors
60% 92.86%
Health challenges 80% 85.71%
Onsite fitness center 60% 64.29%
Stress management 40% 71.43%
Nutrition advice dietician consultations
66.67% 78.57%
Weight lossweight management 66.67% 78.57%
Smoking cessation programs 60% 78.57%
Other 26.67% 21.43%
Wellness Programs & Usage Encouragement
Reduction in healthcare premium as an option has gone down
Safety pg 79; SF215
The biggest change has been in Health Education & Stress Management
Safety pg 82; SF220
Encouraging Usage 2014YE 2015YE
Total Respondents 15 14Communications 100% 100%
Gift certificates gift items 40% 50%
Road shows meetings 66.67% 71.43%
Challenges competition prizes 53.33% 64.29%
Reduction in healthcare premium 66.67% 57.14%
Reduced gym membership fee or gym membership reimb
53.33% 71.43%
Other 33.33% 35.71%
Safety Profile
12
2014YE 2013YE Mean Q1 Q2 Q3 Bars Mean Q1 Q2 Q3 Bars
Vehicle Accidents
Total Frequency Rate of Accidents: Total T&D 7.89 5.53 8.08 10.42 16 8.28 5.31 6.65 9.57 16
Total Frequency Rate of Accidents: Distribution line 9.57 7.12 10.02 11.19 12 7.62 5.83 7.56 9.39 12
Total Frequency Rate of Accidents: Substations 6.39 1.75 5.44 10.69 11 19.13 6.72 10.74 17.95 11
Total Frequency Rate of Accidents: Transmission line 21.64 5.95 9.57 12.62 8 6.87 3.17 6.22 9.53 8
Note: Meter Readers not included
Aside from the Smith Driving System, some utilities are using some new practices to improve vehicle safety (SF35):• No mobile device (calls, texting, bluetooth) (#40, 31)• Management reviews of vehicle infractions (#32)
More companies are using speed monitoring devices than previously.
2013YE 2014YETotal Respondents 10 14Drivecams 30% 29%Backup cameras 70% 79%Speed monitoring devices 30% 43%Other 30% 36%
13
Total Vehicle Accident Rate
Despite focused efforts by most utilities, vehicle accidents are rising.
Mean 7.6Quartile 1 3.4Quartile 2: 7.8Quartile 3: 10.1
Safety pg 28: SF5 Safety pg 28: SF5
14
Corporate Offices
400 Continental Blvd. Suite 600El Segundo, CA 90245(310) 426-2790
New York | Maryland | Texas | Wyoming | Wisconsin
First Quartile Consulting is a utility-focused consultancy providing a full range of consulting services including continuous process improvement, change management, benchmarking and more. You can count on a proven process that assesses and optimizes your resources, processes, leadership management and technology to align your business needs with your customer’s needs.
Visit us at www.1stquartileconsulting.com | Follow our updates on LinkedIn
About 1QC
Satellite Offices
Debi CookDebi.Cook@1QConsulting.com760-272-7277
David WeilerDavid.Weiler@1qconsulting.com607-761-6778
Dave CanonDave.Canon@1qconsulting.com817-980-7909
Dave CarterDave.Carter@1qconsulting.com414-881-8641
Your Presenters
Ken Buckstaff Ken.Buckstaff@1QConsulting.com310-922-0783
Thank You for Your Input and Participation!
Recommended