View
23
Download
0
Category
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
SCOPM Overview Performance Management: The Game Changer. SCOPT Business Meeting December 7, 2010 Savannah, GA. Agenda. Introduction Performance Measurement Framework SCOPM Task Forces Future Activities Questions and Answers. 2. Introduction. History Created in February 2008 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
SCOPM Overview
Performance Management:The Game Changer
SCOPT Business MeetingDecember 7, 2010
Savannah, GA
Agenda
2
1. Introduction
2. Performance Measurement Framework
3. SCOPM Task Forces
4. Future Activities
5. Questions and Answers
Introduction
• History– Created in February 2008– Charge: Provide State DOTs the expertise and resources to support
performance based management and to create a results-driven environment to maximize the performance of both transportation systems and organizations.
• 11 task forces created:– 9 technical task forces– 2 programmatic task forces– Each lead by a member of the SCOPM
SCOPM Leadership
Chair & Preservation TFKirk SteudleMichigan DOT
Safety TFNancy RichardsonIowa DOT
Freight & Economic Development TFTom SorelMinnesota DOT
Comparative Perf. MeasuresDaniela BremmerWashington DOT
Co-ChairPaula HammondWashington DOT
Congestion & Operations TFSteve SimmonsTexas DOT
Comparative Perf. MeasuresMara CampbellMissouri DOT
Connectivity TFFrancis ZieglerNorth Dakota DOT
Planning & Programming ProcessDeb MillerKansas DOT
EnvironmentMatt GarrettOregon DOT
Transit TF & Livability TFare being created
AASHTO Reauthorization Proposal
In 2008, reauthorization proposal adopted. Included a national performance measurement program focused on critical national transportation goals.
Focus attention on key national
goals
More transparency & accountability for the federal
program
Build on the PM work
already in State DOTs
Make the case for a
larger Federal program
Drive better performance
through comparative PM program
Performance targets set in cooperation
w/partners & stakeholders
National Performance Measurement Program
Key elements of the program include:
and NOT include:
National Goals by Congress &
Secretary of Transportation
PMs established through a
collaborative process
For each state – build on the work already done on PMs
Consistent monitoring & reporting of
actual results
Performance measures or
targets established in
legislation
Tying PMs and/or targets
to funding
Disincentives that penalizes
states
Interstate Commerce: Supporting America’s global competitiveness, growth in productivity, economic development, and national defense
through an improved multi-modal freight system
Environment: Enhancing community quality of life
and minimizing impacts on the environment and
global climate change
System Operations: Using advanced management techniques and technologies to assure travel reliability and provide effective
emergency response in disasters
Safety: Reducing traffic fatalities, serious injuries,
and property loss
National Goals
Preservation and Renewal: Preserving highway, transit, and
rail systems so they last for generations to come
Congestion Reduction and Connectivity for Urban and Rural Areas: Improving the ability of highway, transit, and rail to improve personal
mobility, connectivity, and accessibility
Technical Task Forces
• Technical task forces created centered around:1. Safety2. Pavement Preservation3. Bridge Preservation4. Congestion/Operations5. Connectivity6. Environment7. Freight/Economic Competitiveness8. Transit9. Livability
• Offered 2-4 performance indicators in each key area– Working with relevant stakeholders to ensure recommendations could be
embraced as national performance metrics.– Developed a tiered approach.
Readiness Criteria
9
CriteriaInitial Measures –
Ready for Deployment
General consensus on the definition of the measure
Common or centralized approach to data collection in place
Availability of consistent data across states established through a national comparative analysis or other research effort
Candidate Initial Set of Performance Measures for Rollout
10
Goal Area Initial Measures – Ready for Deployment
Safety Multiple year moving average of thenumber of fatalities
Pavement Preservation NHS IRI
Bridge Preservation Deck Area of structurally deficient bridges on NHS
Congestion/Operations Speed based metric
Connectivity No initial measures
Environment No initial measures
Freight/Economic Competitiveness
Speed/travel time on significant freight corridors (SFC)Reliability on SFCs
Transit No initial measures
Livability No initial measures
Programmatic Task Forces
• Planning and Programming– Focus on implementation of performance measures into the planning and programming
process– Engaging Metropolitan and Regional Planning Organizations
• Comparative Performance Measurement Efforts– Demonstrate state DOTs can compare performance in areas key to every DOT’s mission.
National Forum on Performance-Based Planning and Programming
• Co-Sponsored/Organized by AASHTO, APTA, AMPO, NADO, FHWA, FTA
• Funded by FHWA, FTA, AASHTO thru NCHRP 20-24 (58) and the Volpe Center
• Participants equally divided among State DOTs, MPOs and transit agencies with some representation of rural planning agencies as well
• Two and a half day meeting in Dallas (Sept 13-15, 2010)12
Key Themes and Issues
Positive “vibe”
Better education and
communication
Connection to funding
Stronger link between LRPs and programs
Targets
Importance of a national
performance measures program
A Key Ingredient
Collaboration
Share information on
practices of better
performing states
Understand current state of the data –
work towards common
definitions and measurement
practices
Provide states with
comparative view of
performance relative to
peers
Useful practices and
sharing of knowledge and
self - improvement is the goal - not punishment
Get buy-in from states, agree on
guidelines or standards for
comparability – qualify
measures for Tier 1 status
Comparative Performance Measures Program
15
O B J E C T I V E S
RELATIONS TO NATIONAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES
CPM provides valuable input
for development
of national performance
measures
Gain “on the ground”
experience working with
available data
Involve states in building
consensus around
measures
Vet candidate national
measures
Has allowed states to get ahead of the curve to help influence the authorizing
environment
Round 2
16
Comparative Performance Measurement Projects
Bridge ConditionIncident
Response
CPM InfrastructureNCHRP 20-24(37F)
- Framework & functional description for comparative performance database & analysis infrastructure
- Implementation and stewardship approach for the database & web site
Technical Standards & GuidanceNCHRP 20-24(37G)
- Tier 1 Measure definitions, calculation methods, reporting formats
- Action needed to progress Tiers 2&3
- Implementation guidance for nationwide performance program implementation
Future Activities
• Complete technical guidance framework
• Adopt technical guidance framework for each of the goal areas and performance measures
• Support state data collection efforts
• Operationalize/Implement the use of national performance measures in the decision-making process
• SCOPM will collectively look at the integration of other modes in the performance measures
Recommended