Sharing Responsibility along Supply Chains A New Life-Cycle Approach and Software Tool for...

Sharing Responsibility along Supply

Chains

A New Life-Cycle Approach and Software Tool for

Triple-Bottom-Line Accounting

The Corporate Responsibility Research Conference 2006

4-5 September 2006, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland

Dr Thomas Wiedmann

Dr Manfred Lenzen

Integrated Sustainability Analysis

SD ReportingSD Reporting

TBL AccountingTBL Accounting

SD ReportingSD Reporting

TBL AccountingTBL Accounting

World Business Council for Sustainable Development (2002)

“There is a growing awareness that

shareholders’ value is enhanced by

increased corporate social and

environmental responsibility.”

“Corporate sustainability reports and

sustainability ratings are increasingly

used as key information for investment and

lending decisions.”

Challenges remain…

“There is little comparability among the various sustainability rating questionnaires sent to companies.”

“A key challenge remains reporting on the links between sustainability and the bottom line.”

Extend reporting boundaries

“Business will increasingly be expected to report across the value-chain, i.e. on supplier- and consumer-related impacts of activities, products and services.”

Trucost & Defra (May 2006)

Reporting on direct and indirect KPIs

“The Government expects businesses to report on their significant environmental impacts whether they are direct or indirect.”

“Businesses are likely to derive benefit from positively influencing their indirect environmental impacts.”

Indirect (environmental) impacts

Supply Chain Impacts (upstream)

Direct Company Impacts (on-site)

Downstream Impacts

Energy

Raw materials

Logistics

Products in use

Product disposal

Boiler emissions

Car fleet emissions

Manufacturing emissions

Landfill waste

Recycling rate

“… there is still a lack of quantification in most reporting. … the majority of reports lack depth, rigour or quantification.”

“Most business will have supply chain impacts that they should understand and consider reporting. There is no single, quantifiable measure that companies can use as a Key Performance Indicator for the effect of their upstream supply chain on the environment.”

The problem of quantification

Principle 1: quantitative

Principle 2: relevant & reliable

Principle 3: comparable

Principle 4: complete

SD Reporting Principles

TBL Accounting

without boundaries

TBL Accounting

without boundaries

Where to draw the boundary?

e.g. total emissions (direct

plus indirect)

e.g. direct (on-site) emissions

e.g. purchases of a company

How to allocate

indirect impacts

along a supply chain?

How to allocate

indirect impacts

along a supply chain?

Full (100%) Producer Responsibility

>> only on-site impacts!

SAND MINING

GLASS MAKING

GLASS CONTAINER MAKING

FOOD PROCESSING

FINAL CONSUMER

Full (100%) Consumer Responsibility

>> all upstream impacts with the consumer

SAND MINING

GLASS MAKING

FOOD PROCESSING

FINAL CONSUMER

value added / net output

Sharing responsibility …

SAND MINING

GLASS MAKING

FOOD PROCESSING

FINAL CONSUMER

SAND MININGshare

GLASS MAKING

FOOD PROCESSING

FINAL CONSUMER

SAND MININGshare

GLASS MAKING

FOOD PROCESSING

FINAL CONSUMER

SAND MININGshare

GLASS MAKINGshare

FOOD PROCESSING

FINAL CONSUMER

SAND MININGshare

GLASS MAKINGshare

GLASS CONTAINER MAKINGshare

FOOD PROCESSINGshare

FINAL CONSUMER

… shared responsibility

SAND MININGshared

GLASS MAKINGshared

GLASS CONTAINER MAKINGshared

FOOD PROCESSINGshared

FINAL CONSUMER

BottomLine3

A new TBL software tool

BottomLine3

A new TBL software tool

Two data inputs

Financial accounts

On-site impacts

Outputs

> 100 TBL indicators

Quantification of total (direct and indirect) impacts

Sector benchmarking

Quantification of shared responsibility

Structural path analysis

Production layer analysis

IndicatorMy Bakery absolute impacts

My Bakery total intensities

Total Sector intensities

GDP 120,509 $ 8.69 ¢/$ 46.6 ¢/$

Gross operating surplus 244,853 $ 17.7 ¢/$ 17.2 ¢/$

Employment 13.5 emp-y 1.12 emp-min/$ 1.27 emp-min/$

Businesses 0.55 0.0000004 /$ 0.0000009 /$

Greenhouse gas emissions 343 t CO2-e 247 g CO2-e/$ 465 g CO2-e/$

Energy consumption 1,090 GJ 786 kJ/$ 2,640 kJ/$

Water use 30.5 ML 22.0 L/$ 20.1 L/$

Ecological Footprint 99.9 gha 0.72 g-m2/$ 1.18 g-m2/$

Land use 534 ha 3.85 m2/$ 6.99 m2/$

Particulate Matter <2,5mm 0.014 t 0.010 g/$ 0.016 g/$

Main TBL indicators

Benchmark Spider for Old Yorke Bakery

Compensation of employees

Gross operating surplus

Government revenue

Imports

ExportsEmployment

Material flow

Total energy consumption

Greenhouse gases

Benchmark spider diagram (TBL)

Benchmark Spider for Old Yorke Bakery

Total Ecological Footprint

Fossil fuel energy Footprint

Nuclear energy Footprint

Crop land Footprint

Pasture Footprint

Built land Footprint

Sea Footprint

Forest Fooprint

Benchmark spider diagram (Footprint)

Quantification of shared responsibility(GHG emissions in t CO2-eq.)

Responsibility retained by My Bakery

Responsibility passed on to other businesses

Responsibility passed on to final consumer

200.00

400.00

600.00

800.00

1,000.00

1,200.00

1,400.00

1,600.00

1,800.00

2,000.00

2,200.00

Energy consumption (GJ)

Structural Path Analysis

Structural path analysis (particulate matter)

Rank Path DescriptionPath Value

Path Order

Percentage in total impact

1 Refined sugar > My Bakery 0.008 t 2 58.5 %

2 Raw sugar > Refined sugar > My Bakery 0.0011 t 3 7.56 %

3 Animal food > Poultry > My Bakery 0.0010 t 3 6.79 %

4 Paper products > My Bakery 0.0006 t 2 4.14 %

5 Paper containers > My Bakery 0.0005 t 2 3.35 %

6 Electricity supply > My Bakery 0.0003 t 2 2.28 %

7 Electricity supply > Fresh meat > My Bakery 0.00016 t 3 1.14 %

8 Raw sugar > Animal food > Poultry > My Bakery 0.00014 t 4 1.02 %

9 Raw sugar > Plain flour > My Bakery 0.00012 t 3 0.84 %

10 Raw sugar > Raw sugar > Refined sugar > My Bakery 0.00010 t 4 0.69 %

11 Electricity supply > Plain flour > My Bakery 0.00007 t 3 0.52 %

12Animal food > Untreated milk > Dairy products > My Bakery

0.00007 t 4 0.49 %

13 Confectionery > Plain flour > My Bakery 0.00006 t 3 0.44 %

14 Animal food > Untreated milk > Cheese > My Bakery 0.00005 t 4 0.38 %

15 Fresh meat > My Bakery 0.00005 t 2 0.38 %

16 Animal food > Pigs > Fresh meat > My Bakery 0.00005 t 4 0.38 %

17 Animal food > Untreated milk > Butter > My Bakery 0.00004 t 4 0.32 %

THANK YOU

www.bottomline3.com

www.isa-research.co.uk

Sharing Responsibility along Supply Chains A New Life-Cycle Approach and Software Tool for...

Documents

Sustainability and Triple Bottom-Line Performance in the ... · the relationship between sustainability and TBL performance. Keywords Triple Bottom-Line (TBL), Supply Chains, Sustainability,

Risk and Resiliency for More Sustainable Supply Chains · What is Sustainability? • A short description -the ability to endure • Triple bottom line – People – Profit – Planet

Corporate Social Responsibility - CNV Internationaal...international production chains, also called International Corporate Social Responsibility, or ICSR. But what does this mean?

The Triple Bottom Line and Social Responsibility Framework ... · Triple bottom line (TBL) is making inroads into public sector performance measurement partly because it is uncertain

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and the …Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and the electronics sector: issues, products and supply chains BCSD - TAIWAN 20th December 2004

ABSOLUTE TRIPLE-NET INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY IM … · LEASE SUMMARY LEASE TYPE Absolute Triple-Net (NNN) Lease TENANT FirstCash, Inc. (NYSE: FCFS) LANDLORD RESPONSIBILITY None RENEWAL

Financial Transfers and Responsibility in Faecal Sludge … · 2015. 5. 12. · Management 273 Chapter 13 Financial Transfers and Responsibility in Faecal Sludge Management Chains

Corporate Social Responsibility in Global Supply Chains · PDF fileCorporate Social Responsibility in Global Supply Chains of Multinational Companies . Holger Görg Aoife ... Corporate

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN SUPPLY CHAINS THE

CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY REPORT - Adobe...CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY REPORT 2011 Corporate Responsibility Report (including disclosures under the California Transparency in Supply Chains

Sharing Responsibility along Supply Chains

2006 triple bottom line - Xcel Energy · 2018. 3. 26. · Triple Bottom Line: social responsibility, environmental leadership and economic impact. In 2006, Xcel Energy was added to

MAPLE HALL - hfs.uw.edu · elev 334 cr elev 335 cr maple hall level 6 triple triple triple triple triple triple triple triple triple triple ra room ra room 645 643 641 639 635 633

Food Supplement for Joint Care - Namsiang › uploads › belibs › userfiles... · • Type II collagen molecule is a triple helix consisting of 3 peptide chains • Type II collagen

Human Rights in Supply Chains and the Responsibility of ... · Human Rights in Supply Chains and the Responsibility of ... Human Rights in Supply Chains and the Responsibility of

1. The important Characteristics of Carbon Forms 4 covalent bonds Forms double and triple bonds Forms long chains and rings Can bind with many other

Corporate Social Responsibility, the Triple Bottom Line,746580/FULLTEXT01.pdfthe Triple Bottom Line, Standardization and Brand Management in Houston, Texas Corporate Social Responsibility,

As sustainability takes root, - Deloitte US · corporate social responsibility (CSR), sustainable development, the “triple bottom line,” ESG (environmental, social, governance),

M.R. Jutzi & Co. - Industrial and Municipal Auctioneers ... · catalog lot quan description chains chains chains chains chains chains aluminum truck tool box ... yale electric standup

Alcan’s integrated supply chains and strategic partnerships with industrial customers Corporate social responsibility by optimizing supply chains World