View
219
Download
2
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Slide: 1 CEOS Disaster SBA Team – Tokyo, Japan – April 2010
Guy Seguin (CSA), Chair, CEOS Disaster SBA Team
Roadmap for improved disaster management – path forward?
Slide: 2 CEOS Disaster SBA Team – Tokyo, Japan – April 2010
Overview
• Report on December Frascati Meeting• Report on Workplan DI Actions• Approach for Gap Analysis• Disaster Users’ Needs Conclusions• Architecture Requirements or Measurements• Gap Analysis Results• GEOSS Ten-Year Plan Objectives• CEOS Disaster Activities Roadmap
Slide: 3 CEOS Disaster SBA Team – Tokyo, Japan – April 2010
Frascati Meeting - Objectives
• Review GEO objectives for disaster management• Align CEOS action plan with GEO objectives and
improve planification vs list of actions• Harmonize CEOS action plan with disaster Charter• Develop timeline for roadmap development to achieve
GEO 2015 DI Objectives• Participants:
Michael Tanner (GEO secretariat), Ivan Petiteville (CEOS CEO-ESA), Philippe Bally (ESA – Charter Extension), Francois Boubila (ESA), Lorant Czaran (Head UN-SPIDER office), Steven Hosfors (CNES), Laura Frulla (CONAE), Wolgang Lengert (ESA – INSAR Geohazards), Brian Killough (CEOS SEO, NASA), Shelley Stover (NASA), Claus Zehner (ESA – co-chair ACC and Volcanic Ash)
Slide: 4 CEOS Disaster SBA Team – Tokyo, Japan – April 2010
GEOSS Targets and Achievements
By 2015:• More timely dissemination of data in support of full
cycle of disaster management at local, national and regional levels
• Development of a multi-hazard, end-to-end approach for disasters
• Support implementation of Hyogo Framework
Slide: 5 CEOS Disaster SBA Team – Tokyo, Japan – April 2010
CEOS Contribution to GEO Disaster Tasks
• DI-06-09: Use of Satellites for Risk Management
• DI-09-01: Systematic Monitoring for Geohazards Risk Assessmento a) Vulnerability Mapping and Risk Assessmento b) Seismographic Networks Improvement and Coordination
• DI-09-02: Multi-Risk Management and Regional Applicationso a) Implementation of a Multi-Risk Management Approacho b) Regional End-to-End Disaster Management Applications
• DI-09-03: Warning Systems for Disasterso a) Tsunami Early Warning System of Systemso b) Implementation of a Wildland Fire Warning System at Global
Level
Slide: 6 CEOS Disaster SBA Team – Tokyo, Japan – April 2010
Disaster Management Roadmap
10/09 10/10 10/11Use of satellites for risk management
• Multi hazard end-to-end plan development• Gap analysis• Recommendations to CEOS• Action plan to address Gap• Timely dissemination of Data (WGISS)
Risk Mapping and Assessment• INSAR Super sites• Volcanic ash
Regional End-to-end demonstrations• Caribbean Flood Pilot• African Flood/Disease Pilot
Warning Systems• Operational Fire Warning
X
Slide: 7 CEOS Disaster SBA Team – Tokyo, Japan – April 2010
OPEN Disaster Actions
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
DI-06-09_7 Process Modelling for earthquakes, fires and floodsDI-06-09_8 Satellite Systems Architecture for Disaster ManagementDI-09-01a_4 Data for Geohazards Supersites
DI-09-02a_2 Global Operational Volcanic Ash AlertDI-09-02b_2 Caribbean Satellite Disaster PilotDI-09-02b_3 African Flood and Health PilotDI-09-03b_2 Global Geostationary and Polar Orbiting Fire Warning System
2012 – 2015 activities to be defined in 2011 workplan
Slide: 8 CEOS Disaster SBA Team – Tokyo, Japan – April 2010
CLOSED Disaster Actions
DI-06-09_5 Charter Meta Data Catalogue: CNES has completed catalogue based on CNES contributed data. DI-06-09_6 Improved Charter Access: Charter Board has established new mechanisms on regional basis to improve access. ESA conducting African study. DI-09-01a_2 Action Plan for increased INSAR data use: task has migrated to Geohazard Supersite activity (_4)DI-09-01a_3 Operational INSAR use in Canada: initial milestones achieved; task does not involve multiple CEOS agencies and will be monitored directly by CCRSDI-09-02b_1 Contribute satellite data to regional pilots: task has been split into separate Caribbean and Southern African tasks (_2 and _ 3)DI-09-03b_3 Operational Geostationary Fire Warning for GOES, MTSAT and MSG: system up and running at NOAA – new work to focus on integrating polar measurements (_2)
See CEOS Disaster SBA Team Website for presentations on closed actions
Slide: 9 CEOS Disaster SBA Team – Tokyo, Japan – April 2010
• Develop a Data Dissemination model to integrate and make use of existing technologies within WGISS/CEOS, i.e. sensor web, web service, grid, and clearing house for disaster response
• Implement a prototype to demonstrate use of these integrated technologies for Disaster Response
WGISS and Disasters – DI-06-09_7
Slide: 10 CEOS Disaster SBA Team – Tokyo, Japan – April 2010
Geohazards
SuperSites
Active Volcanoes Seismic Faults Landslide prone AreasAreas subject to
subsidence
Best Candidates
• Mauna Loa, Kilauea , Hawaii (USA)
• Etna (I)• Vesuvius / Campi
Flegrei (I)
• Tokyo (Japan)• Istanbul (Turkey)• Los Angeles, US• Vancouver (CA)
Landslides prone areas in: • Ecuador• Japan• Italy • Pakistan (Quetta)• India
Cities (3):• Amsterdam• Mexico• Jakarta
Mining sites (2):• Poland• Loraine (France)
Other Candidates
• Nyiragongo (Congo)• Yellowstone (US)• Piton de la Fournaise
(Fr)• Iceland volcanoes• Sakurajima,
Miyake-Jima (Japan)
• Main Japanese Islands • African Rift Valley• San Francisco (US)• Bam (Iran)• Sumatra (Indonesia)• full Italy / Greece
• ….suggestions?
• ….suggestions?
Initial system
Envisaged enlarged system
Geo-hazard Super Sites – DI-09-01a_4
Provision of SAR and
INSAR Data over the
Geohazard Supersites
Slide: 11 CEOS Disaster SBA Team – Tokyo, Japan – April 2010
Eruption of Etna (Italy) on 27 Oct. 2002
ACC for Volcanic Ash Monitoring – DI-09-02a_2
Demonstrate global operational volcanic ash alert system for aviation hazard avoidance.
Improved algorithms, improved data latency, and addition of
EUMETSAT/SEVIRI data.
Slide: 12 CEOS Disaster SBA Team – Tokyo, Japan – April 2010
Caribbean Satellite Disaster Pilot – DI-09-02b_2
• Phase 1:o Hurricane warning, response and recovery at Caribbean-wide
level: use of Sensor Web to predict flooded areas; near real-time acquisition of optical, thermal infrared, and radar satellite data; post event mapping
o Mitigation activities with five national partners (Barbados, British Virgin Islands, Grenada, Jamaica, Saint-Lucia): satellite data archive mining, background mission imaging, collaboration at national and local level, six regional projects Sensorweb, Coastal decision support tool, urban risk mitigation,
multi-hazard vulnerability mapping, sensitive ecosystem monitoring (landslides) and integration of data into operational warning systems
• Phase 2:o Extension of projects to Phase 2 countries and development of
statement of requirements for Caribbean-wide approach for satellite-based mitigation
Slide: 13 CEOS Disaster SBA Team – Tokyo, Japan – April 2010
Southern African Flood and Health Pilot – DI-09-02b_3
• Extensive flooding in Namibia in 2009• Worked with Guido Van Langenhove, head of Hydrological
Services in Namibia, to identify flood sensorweb pilot scenario
• Collected satellite imagery for months in the Lake Liambezi area
• Collected the following:o Ground measurements (Guido Langenhove)o Rainfall estimates, and predictions for first three months of 2009
(Policelli)o Flood predictions for 1st three months of year (TRMM – Policelli)o Assets:
EO-1 30 meter/10 meter 1 -2 times per week(Frye) Formosat 2 meter data, once per week for 4-6 weeks (requested
from Cheng-Chien Liu MODIS flood map , once per week 4-6- weeks (Requested from Bob
Brakenridge) Radarsat every three days for critical period
Year 3 Accomplishments
Slide: 14 CEOS Disaster SBA Team – Tokyo, Japan – April 2010
Satellite Active Fire Spectral Bands
Resolution IGFOV (km)
SSR (km) Full Disk Coverage 3.9 m SaturationTemperature (K)
Minimum Fire Size at Equator (at 750 K) (hectares)
GOES-E/-WImager
1 visible3.9 and 10.7 m
1.04.0 (8.0)
0.572.3
3 hours >335 K (G-11)>335 K (G-12)
0.15
GOES-10 Imager(South America, 2006)
1 visible3.9 and 10.7 m
1.04.0 (8.0)
0.572.3
3 hours (Full Disk)15-min (SA)
~322 K (G-10) 0.15
MSG SEVIRI 1 HRV2 visible
1.6, 3.9 and 10.8 m
1.6 4.84.8
1.0 3.03.0
15 minutes ~335 K 0.22
FY-2C SVISSR(FY-2D, 2006)
1 visible,3.75 and 10.8 m
1.255.0
30 minutes ~330 K (?)
MTSAT-1R JAMI(HRIT)
1 visible3.7 and 10.8 m
1.04.0
1 hour ~320 K 0.15
INSAT-3D(4th Qtr, 2007)
1 vis, 1.6 m3.9 and 10.7 m
1.04.0
0.57 ?2.3 ?
30 minutes
GOMS Elektro N2MSU-G (2010)
3 visible1.6, 3.75 and 10.7 m
1.0 km4.0 km
30 minutes
COMS (2008) 1 visible3.9 and 10.7 m
1.0 km4.0 km
30 minutes
Satellite View Angle
80°65°
Global GeostationaryActive Fire Monitoring
Capabilities
0-40-80-120-160 40 80 120
80
60
40
20
0
-20
-40
-60
-80
GOES-EGOES-W MSG COMS (116 or 128 E), MTSAT (140 E)
160
GOMS (76 E), INSAT (83 E), FY-2C (105 E)GOES-10
partially implemented by NOAA
Geostationary and polar global fire networkDI-09-03b_2
Inclusion of satellite-based fuel load and fuel condition data
into global early warning system; create data inventory and define specifications and
requirements
Slide: 15 CEOS Disaster SBA Team – Tokyo, Japan – April 2010
DI-06-09_8 : Satellites for Risk Management – Approach
• Examine high level conclusions from user needs• Derive architecture/measurement requirements• Perform gap analysis and examine results• Review GEOSS ten-year objectives• Establish roadmap for improved activities by disaster cycle phase
o mitigationo warning o response and o recovery
Slide: 16 CEOS Disaster SBA Team – Tokyo, Japan – April 2010
“Stop-Light” Chart
RED = 0 missionsYELLOW = 1 to 5 missionsWHITE = > 5 missions
Disaster SBA Information• Current SEO database contains
shows 339 (of 415) missions, 391 (of 984) instruments and 88 (of 146) measurements relevant to Disasters.
• These measurements are a mixture of atmosphere, land and ocean parameters.
• Measurement requirements are based on the GEOSS 10-Yr Implementation Plan.
• Future gap analyses will require better definition of measurements and their detailed requirements to match relevant missions.
Satellites for Risk Management: Measurements and Gap Analysis
Slide: 17 CEOS Disaster SBA Team – Tokyo, Japan – April 2010
Gap Analysis
04/10 06/10 10/10User requirement product identification
Measurement requirements
Gap analysis
Presentation to CEOS Plenary
X
Slide: 18 CEOS Disaster SBA Team – Tokyo, Japan – April 2010
Deliverables for 2010
• Gap analysis for flood • Video on use of satellite data in disaster management• Data dissemination model• Agreement with key CEOS agencies on data for supersites• Phase I of Caribbean flood pilot• Phase I of African flood pilot• Plan for global fire warning using polar orbiting satellites
Recommended