View
214
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
Summary of the Emulsion Reconstruction WG
P. Migliozzi
S. Aoki, L. Arrabito, A. Badertscher, M. Besnier, C. Bozza, E. Carrara, M. Cozzi, G. De Lellis, M. De Serio,
F. Di Capua, L. S. Esposito, T. Fukuda, M. Guler, F. Juget, K. Kodama, M. Komatsu, J. Knuesel, I. Kreslo, I.
Laktineh, A. Longhin, G. Lutter, K. Mannai, A. Marotta, F. Meisel, P. Migliozzi, A. Pastore, L. Patrizii,
C. Pistillo, L. Scotto Lavina, G. Sirri, T. Strauss, V. Tioukov, A. Zghiche
• Tracking in an ECC (M. Besnier, C. Bozza, T. Fukuda, K. Kodama, I. Kreslo, Y. Nonoyama, C. Pistillo, C. Sirignano, V. Tioukov, Zghiche)Vertex location as a function of the event classification (L. Arrabito, C. Bozza, M. De Serio, I. Kreslo, A. Marotta, Y. Nonoyama, C. Pistillo, C. Sirignano)Volume scan, vertex reconstruction and decay selection based on topological criteria (M. Besnier, C. Bozza, F. Di Capua, T. Fukuda, K. Kodama, M. Komatsu, I. Kreslo, A. Marotta, Y. Nonoyama, A. Pastore, C. Pistillo, L. Scotto Lavina, C. Sirignano, V. Tioukov, A. Zghiche)
• Brick to brick connection (E. Carrara, M. Komatsu, A. Longhin);Momentum measurement by MCS criteria (M. Besnier, C. Bozza, M. Komatsu, C. Sirignano, A. Zghiche)e/pi separation and energy measurement (S. Aoki, F. Juget, F. Meisel);p/pi and pi/mu separation (S. Aoki, T. Fukuda, I. Kreslo, I. Laktineh, K. Mannai, C. Pistillo);
• Post-scanning 1mu/0mu classification (Y. Nonoyama);• Kinematical decay selection criteria (C. Bozza, A. Marotta, Y.
Nonoyama, C. Sirignano)
List of activities
Now available on the wiki page)
Brick finding
Trigger
Vertex location
Decay search“long” or “short”
decays
decay mode
Kinematics
events
Classifyas / e
yes
no
Electronic detectors
Emulsions
Emulsions
Electronic detectors
eat 1ry vtx ?
Vertex location
Preliminary results for the the -> DIS and -> QE channels
-> DIS
LONG trigger in emulsione = 95%
conferma del trigger = 99%
scanback = 96%
identificazione topologia = 94% idLONG = 92%
idSHORT-LIKE = 8%
SHORT trigger in emulsione = 93%
conferma del trigger = 98%
scanback = 91%
identificazione topologia = 98%
-> QE
LONG trigger in emulsione = 84%
conferma del trigger = 99.9%
scanback = 97.7%
identificazione topologia = 95.6% idLONG = 83%
idSHORT-LIKE = 17%
SHORT trigger in emulsione = 82%
conferma del trigger = 99%
scanback = 62%
identificazione topologia = 98.9%
A proposal for 0 primary vertex location
Cristiano BozzaSalerno Emulsion GroupPhys. Coord. May 2007
Types of NC-like events
X
h
e-
X
h h
h
e-
production, decay to h
production, decay to e(shower likely)
NC showerless
NC with shower
1)
2)
3)
4)
Main problems of 0-
h
e-
h stop in brick
1) TT prediction cannot define a precise slope/position pair reduced filtering function of CS
2) Many tracks can be found in CS (mostly type 2 and 4) scanback takes time with many paths
3) Scanback paths are likely to lead to 2ry vertices; sizable probabilityof not finding 1ry vertex by direct scanback
However, what we can do witha brick is Scanback + Volume ScanSolution should be found there
Further considerations
Scanning load cannot be increased too much
Lead ECC is a relatively dense material – EM 2ry interactions should be near to the 1ry (X0=0.56 cm 4 cells, 9/7X0=0.72 cm 6 cells)
Track multiplicity is very high in showers, but low momentum e+/e-
are strongly scattered and travel a short length
Scanback is efficient in finding interaction points quickly
Strategy – Step 1
CS Scanning
Search for base-track pairs on CS (no 3-out-of-4)
SCS = slope differencebetween base tracksSCS < 0.015
Rank tracks with SCS and select the first NpCS = 300
Goal of step 1: discard low momentum tracks as soon as possible
Strategy – Step 2
CS – Target connection
Project CS pairs to first two plates of target using most upstream pos/slope
ACST = area to be searched500500m2
SCST = 0.040 (CS-brickmisalignments possible)
Pick up all candidates for each track
Goal of step 2: minimize track losses (scattering should be small)
Strategy – Step 3
Scanback
Follow scanback paths with the same parameters as for in CC
Many scanback paths with low momentumare lost very soon (hard SB parameters)SSB = 0.020 PSB = 80 mMax missing plates NmpSB = 5 plates
Goal of step 3: follow tracks with high momentum as upstreamas possible, and discard low momentum tracks quickly
Strategy – Step 4
TotalScan/NetScan
Choose the NV = 10 paths stopped most upstream (except passing-through paths)
TotalScan around most upstreamstopping pointsUse latest direction to search for 1ry vertex – skewed volumesVolume width grows upstream (AS = slope acceptance 0.4)Correlation between 1ry vertexposition and products of 2ry interactions
Goal of step 4: limit complexity of scanning procedure despite of a small increase in scanning load
Nu
Nd
Catch conversions and charm decays: Nu = 10
Scanning load and data size
Step 1: 240 cm2×2 sides = 480 cm2
Scanning time for both CS = 24 h (at 20 cm2/h/side) (lower if prediction scan is used)Data size = 60 MB for 105 tracks in each CS
Step 2: 0.75 cm2×2 sides = 1.5 cm2
Scanning time = 4min30s (at 20 cm2/h/side) Data size = negligible
Step 3: 300 predictions×57 platesScanning time = 5h42min (at 1.2s/track) Data size < 5 GB
Step 4: 115 cm2 ×2 sidesScanning time = 11h30min (at 20 cm2/h/side) Data size < 5 GB
Total: 41h/brick, < 10 GB/brick
Conclusions
The procedure should be able to fulfill several conflicting goals
Efficiency should be estimated
If 1ry vertex is not found, event interpretation is affected estimate resulting background
Scanning load and data size acceptable
Many parameters can be optimized work for MC experts!
Comments
• The vertex location for events with a muon in the final state works very well (despite of the low base track efficiency, the usage of micro-tracks helps)
• The situation for 0mu-like events is more difficult. More efforts are needed if we want to be ready by September
• We should review this item by mid of July
Vertex Reconstruction
L. Arrabito, M. Besnier, C. Bozza, A. Pastore, L. Scotto
Lavina, V. Tioukov
Summary
Goal :
- Analysis of vertex reconstruction of CC neutrino interactions
Data set:
- Monte Carlo simulation of 3000 CC events generated by OpRoot-ORFEOv7
Properties: - Monte Carlo data (TreeMSE) with smearing and efficiency correction ( eff = 0.944 – 0.216 * – 0.767 * 2 +1.856 * 3
Analysis:
- Tracking and Vertexing performed by Fedra (Similar results have been obtained by using the AlfaOmega framework)
Interactions inside the OPERA brick
Z (cm)
Y ( cm )
X (
cm)
energy spectrum of interacting
- 3000 CC events
- CNGS energy spectrum
Analysed data sample
CC interaction
Neutrino interaction vertex is at the center of the fiducial volume
P0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5-1-2-3-4-5
muon
Volume size : 25 mm2 * 11 plates
P0 = first emulsion sheet containing the neutrino-associated ( X0, Y0 ) = position at ZP0
(X0,Y0)
Pb plate
Emuls. film
Fiducial volume
MC truth vs MC reconstructed vertices
MC truthprimary vertex
primary tracks
secondary tracks
MC recreconstructed
primary vertex
reconstructedprimary tracks
secondary track wrongly attached
to the vertex
x = 0.34 m y = 0.37 m
z = 2.77 m
MC truth vs MC reconstructed vertices: vertex position
1) Study of CC
Nf<1%
z=8.9µmxy= 1.1µm
MC truth
MC rec
p
p
+
+
-
-
e+e-
e+e-
MC truth vs MC reconstructed vertices: interaction products
hadrons
hadrons e+,e-
e+,e-
secondary tracks wrongly attached to the neutrino vertex
tracks really belonging to the neutrino vertex
dz < 1300 m 97 % signal selected
dz < 1300 m 23 % of “wrong” tracks survive
MC truth vs MC reconstructed vertices: interaction products
Generated interactions
3000
TrackReconstructi
on (n primary tracks)
n = 064
(2.2 ± 0.3)%
n = 1583
(19.5 ± 0.7)%
n 22353
(78.4 ± 0.8)%
Multi-prong vertex successfully
reconstructed
2541(86.5 ± 0.6)%
Vertex detection efficiency
Purity (all tracks attached to the vertex are primary)> 99 %
(tracking) ~ 100% for P>1GeV, drastically decreases below 1 GeV
(vertexing) ~ 95% for P>2GeV, drastically decreases below 1 GeV
50% of generated tracks with P<1GeV large angles Low reconstructed
multiplicity
Vertex detection efficiency: dependence on momentum
Overall summary (1/4)
The data/MC comparison on 8 GeV pions shows that data behavior is compatible with MC expectations, apart IP distribution, where a strong discrepancy is present at small values.
The IP distribution discrepancy must be understood. The plate misalignment, together with the inefficiency and the track smearing already simulated, could (at least partially) explain it. Investigations are in progress.
So far, the data/MC comparison on pions is used to make a systematic comparison between data and our MC.To predict the exact IP distribution found in data we need to simulate all the effects:- tracking inefficiency;- track parameters smearing;- plate misalignment;- cosmics and uncorrelated background.
Summary of present activitieson vertex reconstruction and decay search
Studies on CC interactions show that:the tracking efficiency is ~100% for P > 1GeV, drastically decreases below 1 GeV;the vertexing efficiency is ~95% for P > 2GeV, drastically decreases below 1 GeV
Studies on CC () and CC (3h) events show that:Several selection categories are populated by events with low momentum particles, in particular the momentum of particles from decay
All these simulations don’t take into account the effects of electronic reconstruction and neutrino location on the neutrino energy spectrum. Concerning events, they are roughly using the CNGS spectrum without taking into account the energy dependence of oscillations.
Overall summary (2/4)
The neutrino oscillation effect is very easy to reproduce.The electronic reconstruction and neutrino location effects have been parametrized in function of neutrino energy
Summary of present activitieson vertex reconstruction and decay search
Neutrino energy spectrum
CNGSinteracting
CNGSwith m2=2.5x10-3
Interacting
CNGSafter electronicreconstruction
Summary of present activitieson vertex reconstruction and decay search
Overall summary (3/4)
Studies on multiple vertices events like CC (3h) and charmed events show that low efficiencies and purities occur in the reconstruction and correct recognition of vertices while reconstructing 2 vertex in the same fiducial volume.
The reason is the confusion between track associations when the primary and the secondary vertex are too near each other.
Such effect is amplified where tracks have low momentum and high angles and by the presence of fake vertices (wrong associations, interactions, e-pairs,...). A study for the e-pair rejection is shown.
Pair Based Vertexing algorithms implemented in FEDRA cannot be used for the topologies recognition as they are. The pairs association should be studied according to the analysis peculiarities.Global Vertexing method could be more effective and its effectiveness is under study.The study of the microtracks near the vertices could play an important role.
Summary of present activitieson vertex reconstruction and decay search
Comments• The vertex reconstruction is well under
control for νμ events– There are different algorithms with similar
performance. We are in the process to select the “best” algorithm
• The decay search algorithms have to be tuned. In particular, it was shown that– The hunting for short decays (decays in lead) has
to be optimized– The search for multi-prong decays is more difficult
than single-prong. An approach on the so called “Global vertexing” is being tried
• The usage of micro-tracks is mandatory
Momentum measurement by MCS
M. Besnier
Perfect MC linearity, shift for 4 GeV data (250MeV offset)
The MC indicates that it is possible to measure momentum until 8GeV with a resolution of
26%.
MC/data studyData fome from TBàCERN in 2002-04
Resolution update after fit range studies
independently determined!
Large angle results 3 effects appear at large angles ( >0.1rad )
1) Crossed Lead thickness more important
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
MC 4GeV pions at different 3D angle :
How to determine correctly with OPERA track configuration ?
-PMS at 0rad is now implemented in FEDRA with a s set to 1.8mrad. The Z correction with slope is also taken into account.
But no dependance with slope => wrong momentum estimation at large angles.
-First idea of using passing-through cosmic tracks to evaluate the has to be reconsidered because of wide angular and momentum dispersions.
-A way to get the is to parameterise its value with data and update it often.
Pgen (GeV) for cosmic muons with x/y < 0.4rad
x (rad) for cosmic muons
Alberto’s cosmics simulation
Conclusion :
•Some updates on momentum resolutions at 0rad : fitting range does not exceed 14 plates.
• free in the calculation is a wrong way to evaluate the momentum
• angular dependance (under studies) :
-should be parametrised in X and Y directions separately
-or should be avoided by changing coordinates frame
A draft discussing the results related to the first 2 points is in preparation
41
OPERAAnalysis status in Neuchatel
Frank Meisel, Frederic Juget, Guillaume Lutter
01.06.2007
Université de Neuchâtel
42
Status in Neuchatel
Three major projects on emulsion reconstruction (besides scanning):
Developing and integration of an advanced shower reconstruction algorithm/library into FEDRA
Testing different methods of shower reconstruction
Continue/Improve the energy measurement of an electromagnetic shower
43
libShower
First version has been adopted by Frederic, can be used
still options for improving / modifing gives reconstructed shower output file user has to decide which showercandidates to
put in... In the near future me (FWM) will provide
idea/implementation of a shower reco using maybe tracks or more sophisticated
(up to know we have to know the initiating basetrack)
44
Testing different methods shower reconstruction
Using different parametersets to find best set for efficency / purity of a shower with a induced (microscope) bg.
slightly modified algorithm (going downstream instead of upstream)
ConeTube, Neuchatel scanned empty (peanut) Brick for BG
have to scan over 250Mio. parametersets->taking long time.... still running......(Submit on any cluster machine prefered)
taken then best paramters in ShowerReco and for energymeasurement.
For example:
Electron energy
and BG contamination
45
Continue/Improve the energy measurement of an electromagnetic shower
e/pi_Algorithm and variables for e/pi separation taken over:
Number of Basetracks, dR, dTHeta distributions (mean, rms) Longitutinal profile (number of BT per each plate (11...56 sheets)
ANN Structure InputNeurons: 5+#LongProfile => 16...61 variables HiddenLayer1,2: n+1, n (n=InputNeuron) OutputNeuron, 50 TrainingsEpochs on the cont. sample (0.5..6GeV,
0.5..10GeV) 35kEvents
Energy correction has to be done on the output Linear fit function: E_(measured) -> E_(true) Run again with: E_(measured) -> E_(corrected)
Plots/Results for the first ParameterSet:
46
ANN Outputs
Before Linear Energy
Correction
(Trained on
0.5..10GeV,
20Sheets)
After Linear Energy Correction
47
Before Linear Energy Correction After Linear Energy Correction
Shower Resolution can be improved (now ...~50%/Sqrt(E))
20 sheets
48
Summary
Neuchatel is continuing on scanning and simulation:
energy measurement slight improvements in energy resolution: but to early to have
complete datasets insert into shower package also...
Shower Reconstruction (focused on e for now) slight improvements in efficency, purity: but to early to have
complete datasets
developing convenient and useful shower algos and their insertion in fedra
still ongoing....
//separationseparation
Results of Perrine Royole (IPNL)dE/dx (data)
Using only the dE/dX
Multiple scattering
Multiple scattering (simulation)Multiple scattering (simulation)
Multiple scattering
dE/dx
Muon
Pion
Simulation
Multiple scattering (data)
Volume_grains (data) N_ grains (data)
et et separation (data)separation (data)
)3.2_()25.6( 2
grainsNbVolume
Preliminary
// separation (data)separation (data)
% misidentified pions
% muons identification efficiency
Preliminary
Comments
The particle identification in a brick (electron, pion, muon, proton) as well as the momentum/energy measurement is well under control
New test-beams are very important to fine tune the algorithms (see Next talk on TB activities)
Tracking in an ECCTracking in an ECC (M. Besnier, C. Bozza, T. Fukuda, K. Kodama, I. Kreslo, (M. Besnier, C. Bozza, T. Fukuda, K. Kodama, I. Kreslo, Y. Nonoyama, C. Pistillo, C. Sirignano, V. Tioukov, Zghiche)Y. Nonoyama, C. Pistillo, C. Sirignano, V. Tioukov, Zghiche)Vertex location as a function of the event classificationVertex location as a function of the event classification (L. Arrabito, C. Bozza, M. (L. Arrabito, C. Bozza, M. De Serio, I. Kreslo, A. Marotta, Y. Nonoyama, C. Pistillo, C. Sirignano)De Serio, I. Kreslo, A. Marotta, Y. Nonoyama, C. Pistillo, C. Sirignano)Volume scan, vertex reconstruction and decay selection based on topological Volume scan, vertex reconstruction and decay selection based on topological criteriacriteria (M. Besnier, C. Bozza, F. Di Capua, T. Fukuda, K. Kodama, M. Komatsu, (M. Besnier, C. Bozza, F. Di Capua, T. Fukuda, K. Kodama, M. Komatsu, I. Kreslo, A. Marotta, Y. Nonoyama, A. Pastore, C. Pistillo, L. Scotto Lavina, C. I. Kreslo, A. Marotta, Y. Nonoyama, A. Pastore, C. Pistillo, L. Scotto Lavina, C. Sirignano, V. Tioukov, A. Zghiche)Sirignano, V. Tioukov, A. Zghiche)
Brick to brick connectionBrick to brick connection (E. Carrara, M. Komatsu, A. Longhin)(E. Carrara, M. Komatsu, A. Longhin)Momentum measurement by MCS criteriaMomentum measurement by MCS criteria (M. Besnier, C. Bozza, M. Komatsu, (M. Besnier, C. Bozza, M. Komatsu, C. Sirignano, A. Zghiche)C. Sirignano, A. Zghiche)e/pi separation and energy measuremente/pi separation and energy measurement (S. Aoki, F. Juget, F. Meisel)(S. Aoki, F. Juget, F. Meisel)p/pi and pi/mu separationp/pi and pi/mu separation (S. Aoki, T. Fukuda, I. Kreslo, I. Laktineh, K. Mannai, (S. Aoki, T. Fukuda, I. Kreslo, I. Laktineh, K. Mannai, C. Pistillo)C. Pistillo)
Post-scanning 1mu/0mu classificationPost-scanning 1mu/0mu classification (Y. Nonoyama)(Y. Nonoyama) Kinematical decay selection criteriaKinematical decay selection criteria (C. Bozza, A. Marotta, Y. Nonoyama, C. (C. Bozza, A. Marotta, Y. Nonoyama, C.
Sirignano)Sirignano)
Recommended