View
220
Download
1
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SOIL PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF THREE GEOMORPHIC ZONES IN A SEMI-ARID MULGA WOODLAND
-.
R.S.B. Greene
ABSTRACT
I INTRODUCTION
METHODS
The Study Site
Soil Samplina and Analvsis
Determination of Soil ~hvsical Properties
Chemical Analysis
Measurement of Soil Hydraulic Properties
Measurement of Soil-Water Content follow in^ Rain . Preparation of Samples for Micromorpholoeical and SEM Observation
RESULTS
Aeeregate stabilitv (wet-sieving).
Water Characteristics
Soil Hvdraulic Pro~erties
Soil-Water Content Measured Following Rainfall
Micromorpholo~y
Scanning Electron Microsco~y
DISCUSSION
COSCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
1 SOIL PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF THREE GEOMORPHIC ZONES I N A SEFII-ARID
2 MULGA WOODLAND
3 R.S.B. Greene
CSIRO,
D i v i s i o n of W i l d l i f e and Ecology,
PO Box 8 4 ,
Lyneham ACT 2602
ABSTRACT
S o i l p h y s i c a l p r o p e r t i e s were measured i n t h r e e contiguous
geomorphic zones of a p a t t e r n e d sequence of a l t e r n a t i n g groves and
i n t e r g r o v e s i n a semi-arid mulga (Acacia aneura) woodland: ( 1 ) a
runoff zone of s toney , s e v e r e l y sea l ed , s u r f a c e s o i l , (2) an
i n t e r c e p t i o n zone a t t h e bottom of t h e runoff zone, and a d j o i n i n g ( 3 )
a mnon zone o f mulga groves. . I n f i l t r a t i o n was measured i n t h e f i e l d under u n s a t u r a t e d and
s a t u r a t e d cond i t ions us ing a d i s c permeameter a t w a t e r supply
p o t e n t i a l s of -40 and +10 mm r e s p e c t i v e l y . Under u n s a t u r a t e d f low
cond i t ions , t h e r e were no s i g n i f i c a n t d i f f e r e n c e s i n s o r p t i v i t y ,
i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e and h y d r a u l i c c o n d u c t i v i t y between t h e t h r e e zones.
However, under s a t u r a t e d flow cond i t ions , t h e s o i l s i n t h e mulga
groves had i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e s 5-10 t imes h ighe r t h a n t h e s o i l s i n t h e
23 runoff and i n t e r c e p t i o n zones. This d i f f e r e n c e was exp la ined by t h e
2 4 presence of s t a b l e macropores >0.75 rmn diameter i n t h e mulga grove
2 5 s o i l s . Surface s o i l (0-10 mm) aggrega te s from mulga groves were a l s o
2 6 p a r t i c u l a r l y s t a b l e t o r a p i d wet t ing , measured by wet-s ieving.
27 Volumetric water con ten t s (measured o v e r a range of m a t r i c
28 p o t e n t i a l s from 0 t o - 5.0 kPa) of t h e 0-50 mm l a y e r of s o i l from t h e
mulga grove and in tercept ion . .zone were s i g n i f i c a n t l y (p=0.05) higher
than t h e 0-50 mm l a y e r from t h e runoff zone. ~ i c r o m o r ~ h o l o ~ i c a l and
scanning e l e c t r o n microscope (SEM) examination i n d i c a t e t h a t t h e s o i l -.
s u r f a c e from t h e mulga groves and i n t e r c e p t i o n z o n e s had a more porous
s t r u c t u r e than t h e runoff zones. Measurement o f so i l -water con ten t
fo l lowing a major r a i n f a l l even t i n d i c a t e d t h a t wa te r had flowed o f f
the runoff zanes and accumulated i n t h e mulga 'groves.
These f i n d i n g s he lp t o e x p l a i n t h e h i g h e r herbage production
t h a t occurs i n t h e mulga grove and i n t e r c e p t i o n zone compared wi th t h e
runoff zone fo l lowing adequate r a i n f a l l . They a l s o r e v e a l p a r t of the !
d e l i c a t e ba lance of r a i n f a l l r e d i s t r i b u t i o n i n grove/ in tergrove a reas
and t h e p o t e n t i a l f o r management t o a l t e r t h i s ba lance .
INTRODUCTION
Mulga (Acacia aneura) woodlands a r e widely d i s t r i b u t e d i n a r i d
and semi-arid A u s t r a l i a (Neldner 1986) and a r e e s t ima ted t o occupy
1,500,000 km '. (Johnson and Burrows 1981). They a r e important a reas
f o r p a s t o r a l product ion o f wool and beef .
Mulga woodlands occur mainly on i n f e r t i l e r ed e a r t h s o i l s
(S tace e t a1. 1968) wi th f l a t t o s l i g h t l y undu la t ing topography. The
topography f r e q u e n t l y r e s u l t s i n a d i s t i n c t v e g e t a t i o n p a t t e r n , with
the mulga occur r ing a s groves i n s l i g h t l y lower a r e a s t h a t r e c e i v e
runoff water from i n t e r g r o v e a r e a s . I n c e n t r a l and western A u s t r a l i a ,
t h e mulga groves occur a s d i s c r e t e bands on t h e downslope s i d e o f
' r i s e r s ' o r on 'convex s l o p e breaks ' (Mabbutt and Fanning 1987). Near
Louth, New South Wales, a d i f f e r e n t p a t t e r n i n g o f mulga occurs , with
mulga groves on d i s t i n c t ' s t e p s ' or ' f l a t s ' i n t h e landscape (Tongway
and Ludwig 1990).
Rainfall redi.stribution is an important factor in determining
herbage productivity in arid and semi-arid systems. Noy-Meir 11985)
argued on theoretical grounds that redistribution of rainfall, whereby - .
-. - water 'and nutrients are concentrated in a manner, would
significantly enhance herbage production, especially after high
intensity, short duration, rainfall events. In mulga woodland
landscapes, groves of mulga are the runon zones where highest herbage I
production occurs (A.D. Wilson; personal communication).. Tongway et
al. (1989) also found that throughout mulga landscapes there are small
patches, usually associated with mulga logs, that have higher
infiltration rates and nutrient status than surrounding soil. The
nunibers and biomass of plant species on.mulga log mounds were also
greater than on the adjacent soil.
Red earth soils are susceptible to degradation . by overgrazing (Greene and Tongway 1989). Grazing degrades soil physical properties
by removing vegetation cover and physically impacting the soil (Thurow
et al. 1988). Bridge et al. (1983) considered that removal of the
protective vegetation cover on red earth soils by overgrazing, exposes
the soil surface to raindrop splash and results in the formation of
surface seals. Such changes can have a pronounced effect on the
hydrologic characteristics of rangeland soils (Warren et al. 1986).
Even though the redistribution of rainfall in the
grove-intergrove system in a mulga community has been extensively
investigated (Slatyer 1961, Winkworth 1970), little is known about the
soil processes controlling the infiltration and redistribution of
rainfall into the different zones. The aims of this study were to
i n v e s t i g a t e t h e s o i l phys ica l :p roper t i e s of t h e grove- in tergrove zones
and how d i f f e r e n c e s i n s o i l p h y s i c a l p r o p e r t i e s c o n t r o l t h e
i n f i l t r a t i o n and r e d i s t r i b u t i o n of r a i n f a l l . A s i t e o f p r i s t i n e mulga .. .
woodland was s e l e c t e d f o r t h e s tudy.
METHODS
The Studv S i t e
The s tudy was conducted on "Lake Mere" sta:ion (145 9 54' E.,
30 17' S.) , 3 5 h n o r t h o f Louth, N.S.W., and comprised an a r e a
1,250m by 1,600m of p r i s t i n e mulga woodland. The a r e a was subsequent ly
used f o r a sheep and kangaroo g raz ing s tudy. Tongway and Ludwig (1990) !
described a p a t t e r n e d sequence o f t h r e e geomorphic zones, each w i t h a
d i s t i n c t i v e vege ta t ion , on t h e s tudy s i t e . The zones a re : ( i ) a
runoff s lope of E r a g r o s t i s er iopoda savanna ( runoff zone), ( i i ) a
runon zone of Monachather paradoxa savanna a t t h e t o e o f the runoff
s lope ( i n t e r c e p t i o n zone) and, ( i i i ) a runon zone o f Acacia aneura . woodland (mulga g rove) .
The s i t e was s i t u a t e d on the Landsdowne l a n d system ( S o i l
Conservation Se rv ice , N.S.W. 1983), and comprised low undu la t ing stony
r idges o f mainly sedimentary rock, with a d e n d r i t i c dra inage system.
The s o i l was c l a s s i f i e d as a massive r ed e a r t h Gn 2.12 (Northcote e t
d l . 1975) c o n s i s t i n g o f a red-brown loamy s u r f a c e s o i l over a massive
red t e x t u r e B hor izon. Some a n a l y t i c a l d a t a f o r t h e upper 0.75111 of a
t y p i c a l p r o f i l e i n a mulga grove ad jacen t t o t h e s t u d y s i t e a r e given
i n Table 1.
S o i l Sampline and Ana lvs i s •
S o i l samples f o r aggregate s t a b i l i t y de terminat ions and
chemical a n a l y s i s were taken from 1 2 l i n e t r a n s e c t s ( c a . 100 m long)
d i s t r i b u t e d ac ross t h e s tudy s i t e . Each t r a n s e c t was p a r a l l e l t o the
direction of overland water f'low and included the three geomorphic
zones described by Tongway and Ludwig (1990).
Three soil samples of the 0-lcm layer (each sample consisting -
of two bulked cores) within each zone were collected at random along
each of the line transects , giving a total of 36 replications.
Following air-drying, the soil samples were sieved into two size
I fractions of 2-10 mm and <2 mm.
Determination of Soil Phvsical Properties
Aggregate stability of soil samples (2-10 mm size fraction)
was determined by using the wet-sieving method (Kemper and Rosenau
1986). Air-dried soil (20g) was transferred to the uppermost of a set
of four sieves (with openings of 2.0, 1.0, 0.5 and 0.25 mm diameter).
The height of the 2.0mm sieve was adjusted so that immediately the
aggregates were added, they were completely immersed in distilled
water and underwent rapid wetting. The soil was then wet-sieved for 5
min (150 oscillations), with the water level adjusted so that the
aggregates on the 2.0mm sieve were just submerged at the highest point
of the oscillation. The soil remaining on each sieve was dried at
105OC and weighed.
The wet sieving results are expressed as a percentage of
water-stable aggregates >2, 2-1, 1-0.5, 0.5 - 0.25 and <0.25 rmn
diameter. The wet-sieving results were also expressed as a
mean-weight-diameter (MWD) value (Kemper and Rosenau 1986).
Water characteristics were measured on undisturbed cores (70
mm dim. and 50 mm depth) of surface soil. Three cores were taken at
random from each of the three zones in two line transects, giving a
total of six replications per zone. The cores were wet up on ceramic
plates and then drained to the following values of matric potential:
-0.3, -1.0, -3.0 and -5.0 kPa., The vo lumet r i c mois tu re con ten t of the I
s o i l a t each m a t r i c p o t e n t i a l was determined from t h e mass of t h e co re
a t t h a t ma t r i c p o t e n t i a l and t h e oven-dried (105OC) mass of t h e core. -
T o t a l p o r o s i t y c a l c u l a t e d from bulk d e n s i t y (Loveday 1974) w a s used
f o r t h e volumetr ic mois tu re c o n t e n t a t s a t u r a t i o n (0 kPa). The amount
of volumetr ic wa te r con ten t dra ined from t h e c o r e s i n t h e m a t r i c
I p o t e n t i a l range o f 0 t o -0.3 kPa and -0.3 t o -3.0 H a was $ l s o
c a l c u l a t e d .
Bulk d e n s i t y va lues were a l s o determined a t va r ious he igh t s i n
t h e s o i l p r o f i l e by t ak ing undis turbed c o r e s (70 m diam. and 50 m
depth) and drying them a t 105 C.
S o i l s u r f a c e r e s i s t a n c e measurements were taken wi th in each o f
t h e 12 l i n e t r a n s e c t s by us ing a P r o c t o r penet rometer ; su r face
c racks , clods o r p l a n t r e s i d u e s were avoided. Three readings were
taken a t random w i t h i n each zone, g i v i n g a t o t a l o f 36 r e p l i c a t i o n s . .
The maximum f o r c e r equ i red t o push a 65 m2 c i r c u l a r f l a t top
v e r t i c a l l y i n t o a depth o f 12.5 nun was recorded. The corresponding
r e s i s t a n c e (MPa) was then c a l c u l a t e d . The m o i s t u r e content o f t h e 0-10
nun s o i l l aye r , immediately a d j a c e n t t o where t h e penetrometer
measurement was made, was a l s o determined c o n c u r r e n t l y with t h e s o i l
s u r f a c e r e s i s t a n c e measurements.
Chemical Analvsis
Chemical analyses were c a r r i e d o u t by t h e fo l lowing methods:
( i ) pH and e l e c t r i c a l c o n d u c t i v i t y (EC) - 1:s so i l -wa te r suspension
shaken f o r l h .
( i i ) Organic carbon - Walkley-Black wet combustion (Colwell 1969).
( i i i ) T o t a l n i t rogen - Kje ldah l d i g e s t i o n (Twine and Williams 1967).
Measurement of Soil Hvdraulic '.Properties
Infiltration measurements were made in the field using disc
permeameters (200 mm diameter) that supplied water at a potential of - . -- - . . - -
either +I0 o; -40mm (~erroux and White 1988). Within each of the 12
line transects, three measurements of infiltration at each supply
potentials were made at random within each zone. The water used for
' the measurements had an electrical conductivity of 0.07 dS m-'. In the
mulga groves, the Ao layer of litter (mainly leaves from Acacia
aneura) was carefully removed before carrying out the measurements. At
a supply potential of -40mm, a layer of diatomacous earth,
approximately 5mm thick, was used to provide a contact with the soil.
Initial and final water contents were also detem&ed. Immediately
adjacent to the area where the infiltration measurements were carried
out, the bulk density of the soil was measured with . . undisturbed cores
of 70 mm diam. and 20 mm depth. At both water supply potentials,
sorptivity, infiltration rate and hydraulic conductivity were
calculated according to the method of White (1988).
Measurement of Soil-Water Content Followinz Rain
Over the period 1-2 March, 1987, 37.5 mm of rain fell at the
site. Following the rainfall event, the gravimetric soil-water content
profile was measured in each of the three geomorphic zones in three
transects. These values were converted to volumetric soil-water
content using values of bulk density measured down the profile (Table
1). Soil-water contents were measured to approximately 300 mi in the
runoff slopes and interception zones (the depth of wetting) and
approximately 400 mm in the mulga groves. The soil-water content
obtained in the lower limit of drying under rangeland conditions
(Johns 1984) was then s u b t r a c t e d from each p r o f i l e . These va lues were
16.4 mm and 25.4 mm f o r t h e 0-300 mm and 0-400 mm d e p t h s r e spec t ive ly .
This gave t h e amount of water i n each zone r e s u l t i n g from the . -
r a i n f a l l .
Preuara t ion of Samples f o r Mic romor~ho loe ica l and SEM Observat ion
Dup l i ca te v e r t i c a l samples 160 x 90 x 50 mm depth were I
c o l l e c t e d i n t i n s from t h e t h r e e geomorphic zones f o r th inLsec t ion ing .
Samples were a i r - d r i e d (40 C ) , impregnated w i t h p o l y e s t e r con ta in ing
a f l u o r e s c e n t dye ( V r i t e x OB) and th in-sec t ioned by s tandard
procedures (Brewer 1976).
Undisturbed p i e c e s ( ca . 30 mm diameter , 10 mm depth) o f the
s o i l su r face from each o f t h e t h r e e geomorphic zones were c a r e f u l l y
removed with a s p a t u l a and t r anspor t ed t o t h e l a b o r a t o r y . A f t e r
a i r -dry ing , t h e samples were broken i n t o s m a l l e r p i e c e s and glued onto
an SEM s tub , w i t h t h e s o i l s u r f a c e f ac ing upwards. The . samples were
vacuum coated w i t h go ld and examined wi th a Cambridge SlSO SPI a t a
range o f magnif ica t ions .
RESULTS
A ~ a r e z a t e S t a b i l i t v (wet-sievinpj .
Fig.1 shows t h e t h a t t h e r e i s a marked d i f f e r e n c e i n t h e
d i s t r i b u t i o n o f wa te r - s t ab le aggregates between t h e t h r e e zones. Af te r
wet s i ev ing , t h e s o i l aggregates mainly occur as p a r t i c l e s >2.0 mm and
p a r t i c l e s ~ 0 . 2 5 mm. The mulga grove s o i l s have more water -s table
aggregates >2.0 mm than t h e i n t e r c e p t i o n zone o r t h e e r o s i o n s l o p e
s o i l s and correspondingly l e s s <0.25 mm aggregates .
MWD f o r each o f t h e t h r e e zones, along wi th s o i l su r face
r e s i s t a n c e , bulk d e n s i t y , o rgan ic carbon percentage and t o t a l n i t rogen
percentage a r e a l s o g iven i n Table 2. Even though t h e r e was a
significant difference in bull; density between the three zones, there
was no significant difference in soil surface resistance.
Water Characteristics . - . . .- -
At all iitric potential values from 0 to -5.0 kPa , the soil
from the mulga groves and interception zones had a significantly
higher (P=0.05) volumetric water content than the soil from the runoff
slopes (Table 3). Also, in the matric potential range -0.3 to -3.0
kPa, the amount of volumetric water content drained from the mulga
grove and interception zone soils was significantly higher (P=0.05)
than the soil from the runoff slope (Table 4).
Soil Hvdraulic Properties
Table 5 shows the sorptivity, infiltration rate and hydraulic
conductivity values at supply potentials of + l o and -40 nnn for the
three zones. Under ponded infiltration (+I0 mm), there are significant
differences in the hydraulic properties between the th~ee zones. This
particularly occurs when log values are compared. For example, the
sorptivity of the runoff slope is significantly lower than the
interception zone and mulga grove. Also, the infiltration rates of the
three zones is in the order: runoff slope < interception zone C mulga
grove. The hydraulic conductivities of both the runoff slope and
interception zone are significantly lower than the mulga grove.
However, at -40 nnn supply potential, there are no significant
differences in the hydraulic properties between the zones. The
infiltration rate of all zones is approximately half that of the
runoff slope measured under ponded conditions.
Soil-Water Content Measured Followine Rainfall
Table 6 shows that the 37.5 mm rainfall event resulted in a
major redistribution of water between the three zones. Of the 37.5 m,
15.7 mm (42%) occurred i n t h e runoff s lope , 33.7 mm (90%) i n the
i n t e r c e p t i o n zone, and 51.6 mm (138%) i n t h e mulga grove.
Micromorphological examination o f t h e t h r e e zones showed
marked d i f f e r e n c e s i n p o r o s i t y . S o i l from t h e runoff s lope e x h i b i t s a
d iscont inuous s e a l wi th a smooth su r face l a y e r con ta in ing no l a r g e
I pores and absence o f b i o l o g i c a l a c t i v i t y (Figure 2a) . )The f i n e
h o r i z o n t a l c racking i s probably an a r t i f a c t produced by sampling. Even
though t h e i n t e r c e p t i o n zone s o i l a l s o conta ined a smooth surface ,
t h e r e was evidence of c racks , 1-2 rmn diameter i n t o t h e s u b s o i l (Figure j
2b). A t a depth o f 2-3 cm, t h e s u b s o i l c o n t a i n s burrows, i s we l l
s t r u c t u r e d and s t r o n g l y b io tu rba ted . The mulga grove s o i l c o n s i s t s of
an upper l a y e r , s e v e r a l m i l l i m e t r e s th i ck , c o n s i s t i n g predominantly o f
organic l i t t e r , wi th channels , 1-2 mm d iameter , i n t o t h e s u b s o i l
(Figure 2c) .
S c a n n i n ~ E lec t ron Microscoov
The SEM micrographs i n d i c a t e d a marked d i f f e r e n c e between the
su r faces of t h e t h r e e zones (Fig.3) . The s u r f a c e of t h e runoff zone
appeared t o have s l aked i n t o i n d i v i d u a l sand and s i l t p a r t i c l e s ,
forming a dense s t r u c t u r e wi thout o r g a n i c d e b r i s (F ig . 3a ) . However,
i n t h e i n t e r c e p t i o n zone, t h e su r face has a more porous s t r u c t u r e and
the re was evidence of aggregat ion between sand, s i l t and c l a y
p a r t i c l e s (Fig. 3b) . There was a l s o a n abundance o f o rgan ic d e b r i s and
r o o t l e t s a s s o c i a t e d wi th t h e aggregates . The mulga grove s o i l s a l s o
had a w e l l aggregated s t r u c t u r e with abundant o rgan ic d e b r i s , and
l a r g e pores, >I00 um diameter , were v i s i b l e (Fig. 3 c ) .
DISCUSSION
The i n f i l t r a t i o n a n d ' r e d i s t r i b u t i o n o f r a i n f a l l i n a mulga
woodland community w i l l be c o n t r o l l e d by b o t h t h e geomorphic p a t t e r n
of t h e landscape and t h e s o i l p h y s i c a l p r o p e r t i e s of t h e runoff/runon - . -- . . . . ..
zones: Even though previous i ~ o r k by S l a t y e r (1961) had suggested t h a t
t h e i n f i l t r a t i o n and r e d i s t r i b u t i o n of r a i n f a l l i n t o grove/ in tergrove
a r e a s was l a r g e l y due t o landscape p a t t e r n , v e r y l i t t l e a t t e n t i o n was
g i v e h t o t h e r o l e of s o i l p h y s i c a l p r o p e r t i e s . The measurements
desc r ibed i n t h i s paper i n d i c a t e t h a t t h e s u r f a c e s o i l s i n t h e t h r e e
zones have marked d i f f e r e n c e s i n t h e i r p h y s i c a l p r o p e r t i e s
( p a r t i c u l a r l y s t r u c t u r a l s t a b i l i t y and i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e s ) and t h a t
t h e s e d i f f e r e n c e s had a l a r g e e f f e c t on t h e r e d i s t r i b u t i o n of
r a i n f a l l .
Di f ferences i n s o i l phys ica l p r o p e r t i e s w i l l be l a r g e l y
determined by t h e amount of v e g e t a t i o n cove r i n t h e d i f f e r e n t zones.
More v e g e t a t i o n cover occurs i n t h e i n t e r c e p t i o n zones and mulga
groves than i n runoff zones, p a r t i c u l a r l y i n y e a r s of low annual
r a i n f a l l (A.D. Wilson; pe r sona l communication). Vegeta t ion cover i s
impor tant because n o t only does i t p r o t e c t t h e s o i l s u r f a c e from
r a i n s p l a s h and s u r f a c e c r u s t i n g e f f e c t s (Eps te in and Grant 1973), bu t
it a l s o inc reases t h e s o i l o rgan ic m a t t e r c o n t e n t . Table 2 shows t h a t
t h e mulga grove s o i l s have h ighe r o rgan ic carbon (and t o t a l n i t rogen)
l e v e l s than t h e runoff s lope and i n t e r c e p t i o n zone s o i l s . S o i l s with
h i g h e r organic m a t t e r content u s u a l l y c o n t a i n more s t a b l e aggregates
( T i s d a l l and Oades 1982). Th i s i s because s o i l po lysaccha r ides and
humic subs tances i n s o i l o rgan ic m a t t e r a r e absorbed by s o i l mineral
p a r t i c l e s and a s s i s t w i th t h e formation and s t a b i l i z a t i o n of
aggrega te s .
Thus t h e mulga grove s o i l s have h i g h e r aggrega te s t a b i l i t i e s
1 than t h e runoff s lope and i n t e r c e p t i o n zone s o i l s (Table 2 ) . Also, t h e
wet-sieving r e s u l t s (F igure 1) demonstrate t h a t t h e s o i l s from t h e
runoff s l o p e s and i n t e r c e p t i o n zones s l a k e more r e a d i l y i n t o c0.25 mm
diameter microaggregates than t h e s o i l s from t h e mulga groves. S laking
i s t h e p rocess by which u n s t a b l e s o i l macroaggregates >0.25 mn
diameter breakdown i n water i n t o microaggregates 4 . 2 5 mn d i m e t e r
(Oades 1984). I n a d d i t i o n t o s l a k i n g dur ing r a ins to rms , unktable s o i l s 1
can a l s o undergo d i s p e r s i o n . D i spe r s ion is de f ined a s t h e
d i saggrega t ion i n wa te r of microaggregates i n t o s m a l l e r u n i t s , o f t e n
d i s c r e t e c l a y p a r t i c l e s , <2.0 um d iamete r . Greene and Tongway (1989)
have shown t h a t red e a r t h s o i l s undergo d i s p e r s i o n when subjec ted t o
mechanical s t r e s s , e .g. by r a ind rop s p l a s h .
Therefore , when t h e u n s t a b l e s o i l s i n t h e runoff s lope and
i n t e r c e p t i o n zone a r e wet up du r ing r a i n , they breakdown not only
because they have l e s s cover, b u t because they a r e more s t r u c t u r a l l y
uns table . The rearrangement o f s o i l p a r t i c l e s a t t h e Surface r e s u l t i n g
from s l a k i n g and d i s p e r s i o n o f u n s t a b l e aggrega te s causes s o i l pores
t o become blocked and t h e i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e t o decrease . Dexter
(1988), cons idered t h a t i t i s impor tant t h a t t h e r e is always <15% of
c0.25 mm p a r t i c l e s which can b lock pores . Williams and Bone11 (1988),
found t h a t where macropores were produced by t h e a c t i v i t i e s of s o i l
fauna, such a s a n t s and t e r m i t e s , t h e openings o f such channels a r e
temporar i ly o r permanently blocked by inwashing o f sp lashed m a t e r i a l
from ra ind rop impact.
Therefore, t h e tendency f o r t h e runoff zone and i n t e r c e p t i o n
zone s o i l s t o s l a k e more r e a d i l y i n t o ~ 0 . 2 5 urn p a r t i c l e s compared wi th
t h e mulga grove s o i l s , would p a r t l y account f o r t h e l o w s a t u r a t e d
i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e s measured i n t h e s e zones. The micromorphological and
SEM examinat ion o f t h e t h r e e s o i l s a l s o show t h e more porous n a t u r e of
mulga grove s o i l compared w i t h t h a t of t h e runoff and i n t e r c e p t i o n
zone s o i l s . - . --
I n - a d d i t i o n t o promoting s t r u c t u r a l s t a b i l i t y , h i g h e r
i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e s are u s u a l l y a s s o c i a t e d w i t h v e g e t a t i o n cover ,
p a r t i c u l a r l y t h a t due t o shrubs . Scho l t e (1989) measured t h e
i n f l i l t r a t i o n r a t e s o f Chromic Luviso ls i n a number of a r e a s w i t h
va r ious v e g e t a t i o n covers and showed a c l e a r r e l a t i o n s h i p o f
i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e w i t h v e g e t a t i o n cover and biomass. The i n f i l t r a t i o n
r a t e measured under t h e shrub Boscia co r i aceae was approximately 20
times g r e a t e r t h a n t h a t measured on a sea l ed s u r f a c e s o i l . Other
workers (Lyford and Qashu 1969, Blackburn 1975) 'have a l i o shown t h a t
the i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e measured near t h e stems of p l a n t s was h ighe r
than t h e a r e a between p l a n t s . Johnson and Gordon (1988) used a
r a i n f a l l s i m u l a t o r on a sagebrush (Artemisia t r i d e n t a t a ) dominated
site t o show t h a t t h e i n t e r s p a c e a r e a s produced 2.5 t imes a s much
runoff a s from shrub canopy zones. I n t h e c u r r e n t work,the
i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e s measured under t h e shrubs Acacia aneura were
approximately 10 t imes h igher than t h e i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e s measured i n
the runoff zones.
The i n f i l t r a t i o n measurements a t s a t u r a t e d (+ lo rn ) and
unsa tu ra t ed (-40mm) supply p o t e n t i a l s , show t h e importance o f pores
>0.75 mm diameter i n conduct ing water i n t o t h e s u b s o i l i n t h e mulga
groves . Emerson e t a1 . (1986) considered t h a t h igh i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e s
would be l a r g e l y determined by t h e presence of a cont inuous network o f
macropores, approximately 1.0 mm diameter , which a r e s t a b l e t o we t t ing
and can conduct wa te r i n t o t h e subso i l . White (1988) has sugges ted
t h a t i t was t h e s e l a r g e pores which tend t o c o l l a p s e f i r s t under
compaction o r r a i n f a l l . A t a , s u p p l y p o t e n t i a l of -40mm, when pores
>0.75 mm d iameter are n o t c o n t r i b u t i n g to w a t e r flow; t h e s u r f a c e
s o i l s i n t h e t h r e e zones have s i m i l a r i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e s . Kowever, t h e
-. g r e a t l y enhanced i n £ i l t r a t i o n r a t e s (under ponded cond i t ions ) i n -the
mulga grove soils i n d i c a t e t h e r o l e o f po res >0.75 mm d iameter i n
conducting water . This s i z e pore i s very prominent i n t h e mulga grove
s o i l s and t o a l e s s e r e x t e n t i n t h e i n t e r c e p t i o n zond s o i l s . , I
These macropores could be formed by s o i l fauna, p l a n t roo t s o r
c o n s i s t o f c r a c k s and f i s s u r e s due t o shr inkage o f t h e soil (Beven and
Germann 1982, Moore e t a l . 1986). There i s more oppor tun i ty f o r t h e 1
formation of such macropores i n the mulga grove s o i l s , where roo t and
faunal a c t i v i t y i s h ighe r than i n t h e runoff and i n t e r c e p t i o n
zone s o i l s . S c h o l t e (1989) found t h a t high i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e s of
Chromic Luvisols measured under shrubs was due t o t e r m i t e a c t i v i t y .
Athough t e r m i t e s and a n t s may e i t h e r impede o r f a c i l i t a t e t h e flow of
water through t h e s o i l (Lobry de Bruyn 1990) , work on o t h e r massive
red e a r t h s o i l s (Greene and Tongway 1989, Greene e t a l . 1990), s i m i l a r
t o t h e Lake Mere s o i l s , i n d i c a t e t h a t h igher i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e s
coinc ide with t h e presence of p r e f e r e n c i a l f low p a t h s caused by fauna l
a c t i v i t y .
The g r e a t e r volumetr ic moisture c o n t e n t s i n t h e m a t r i c
p o t e n t i a l range 0 t o -0.5 kPa of t h e mulga grove and i n t e r c e p t i o n zone
s o i l s compared w i t h t h e runoff s lope s o i l s (Table 3 ) i s f u r t h e r
evidence t h a t they con ta in more macropores and hence can conduct water
a t a g r e a t e r r a t e . The g r e a t e r amount o f volumetr ic mois ture content
drained by t h e mulga grove s o i l s i n the ma t r i c p o t e n t i a l range of -0.3
t o -3.0 kPa ( e q u i v a l e n t t o pores of 1.0 and 0.1 mm diameter ,
r e spec t ive ly ) a l s o shows t h a t pores of 1 .0 mm diameter a r e more
prominant i n t h e mulga g r o v e . s o i l s t han i n t h e i n t e r c e p t i o n zone and
runoff zone s o i l s (Table 4) .
The h i g h e r i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e s o f t h e s o i l s i n t h e mulga groves --
and i n t e r c e p t i o n zones l a r g e l y determine how r a i n i s r e d i s t r i b u t e d i n
t h e d i f f e r e n t zones. S l a t y e r (1961) a l s o demonstrated t h a t bes ides t h e
advantage of runoff water , t h e s o i l s i n t h e groves have h igher
i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e s t h a n t h e i n t e r g r o v e s o i l s . It bas been suggested I
t h a t , i n t h e m a j o r i t y of r a i n f a l l s , t h e i n t e r g r o v e and i t s downslope
grove c o n s t i t u t e a c losed system, w i t h no n e t runoff through t h e t i e r
(Mabbutt and Fanning 1987). The sampling f o r so i l -water i n t h e t h r e e
zones a f t e r t h e r a i n event o f 37.5 mm showed t h a t t h e r e had been a
major r e d i s t r i b u t i o n of water . The h i g h e r i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e s i n t h e
mulga grove s o i l s r e s u l t e d i n more wa te r e n t r y i n t o t h e s u b s o i l than
i n t h e runoff and i n t e r c e p t i o n zone s o i l s .
CONCLUSIONS .
Mulga grove s o i l s were found t o c o n t a i n s t a b l e macropores
>0.75 mm diameter , bu t t hese were l a r g e l y a b s e n t i n t h e runoff a r e a s .
The s t a b i l i t y o f t h e s e macropores was l a r g e l y due t o t h e vege ta t ion
cover i n t h e mulga groves. They caused t h e i n f i l t r a t i o n r a t e t o be 10
times h igher i n t h e runon a r e a s than t h e runof f a r e a s . They t h e r e f o r e
l a r g e l y c o n t r i b u t e t o t h e r e d i s t r i b u t i o n of wa te r from t h e runoff zone
t o the mulga g roves t h a t occur s dur ing major r a i n f a l l events .
Rangeland management p r a c t i c e s , such a s p re sc r ibed burning o r
overgrazing, t h a t markedly a l t e r t h e v e g e t a t i o n cover and hence t h e
s o i l phys ica l p r o p e r t i e s of t h e d i f f e r e n t zones, have t h e p o t e n t i a l t o
a l t e r t h e r a i n f a l l r e d i s t r i b u t i o n i n g rove / in t e rg rove a reas . Fu r the r
s t u d i e s a r e p r e s e n t l y underway t o q u a n t i f y t h e e f f e c t s of d i f f e r e n t
grazing i n t e n s i t i e s on vege ta t ion cover and wa te r r e d i s t r i b u t i o n .
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The t e c h n i c a l a s s i s t a n c e o f M r G.R. Sawte l l i s g r a t e f u l l y
acknowledged. D r C.J . Char t r e s and M r I. S a l i n s of the Div i s ion of .
S o i l s a s s i s t e d w i t h t h e microkorphology and D r J.J. ~ i i i a r , Bendigo
College of Advanced Education, V i c t o r i a , a s s i s t e d i n the p repa ra t ion
and i n t e r p r e t a t i o n o f t h e SEM micrographs. Drs I. White and M . J . Su l ly
! of t h e Centre o f Environmental Mechanics provided va luable aflvice and
t r a i n i n g wi th t h e d i s c permeameters. Comments on a n e a r l i e r d r a f t by
Drs K.R.J . Smettem, K.C. Hodgkinson and B.H. Mckenzie were g r a t e f u l l y
apprec ia ted . The typ ing of t h e manuscript was e x p e r t l y c a r r i e d out by
Robyn Quinnell .
REFERENCES
Bevan, K . , and Germann, P. (1982). Macropores and waterf low i n s o i l s .
Water Resour. Res. 18, 1311-1325. . . . - -- . . -
Blackburn, W.. (1975). Fac to r s a f f e c t i n g i n f i l t r a t i o n and sediment
product ion o f semi-arid rangelands i n Nevarda. Water Resour.
Res. 11, 929-937.
IBrewer, R. (1976). Fabr i c and Mineral Analysis of s o i l s , Krieger , New
York, NY 2nd ed . , pp. 483.
Bridge, B.J. , Mott, J.J., and Hart igan, R.J. (1983). The format ion of
degraded a r e a s i n t h e dry savanna woodlands o f no r the rn
A u s t r a l i a . Aust. J. S o i l Res. 21, 91-104.
Colwell, J.D. (1969). Auto-analyser procedure f o r o r g a n i c carbon
a n a l y s i s of s o i l . CSIRO Aust. Div. S o i l s , Na t l . S o i l F e r t .
P r o j . , C i r c . No. 5.
Dexter, A.R. (1988). Advances i n c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n of s o i l . s t r u c t u r e .
S o i l and T i l l a g e Res. 11, 199-238.
Emerson, W.W., F o s t e r , R.C., and Oades, J . M . (1986). Organo-mineral
complexes i n r e l a t i o n t o s o i l aggregat ion and s t r u c t u r e . I n
' I n t e r a c t i o n s of s o i l minera ls wi th n a t u r a l o rgan ics and
microbes' . S o i l Sc i . Soc. of Am. Spec. Pub. No. 17.
Goodspeed, M . J . , and Winkworth, R.E. (1978). Fa te and e f f e c t o f runoff I
- wi th p a r t i c u l a r r e fe rence t o a r i d and semi-arid p l a i n lands.
In : S t u d i e s of the Aus t ra l i an Arid Zone 111. Water i n
Rangelands. (ed. K.M.W. Howes). pp. 53-56. CSIRO A u s t r a l i a .
Greene, R.S.B., Char t e s , C.J., and Hodgkinson, K.C. (1990). The
e f f e c t s o f f i r e on t h e s o i l i n a degraded semi-arid woodland.
1 . Cryptogam cover and phys ica l and micromorphological
p r o p e r t i e s . Aust. J. S o i l Res. 28 ( i n p r e s s ) .
1 Greene, R.S.B., and Tongway, D.J. (1989). The significance of
(surface), physical and chemical properties in.determining
soil surface condition of red-earths in rangelands. Aust. J.
. . .- Soil Res. 27, 213-225.
Johns, G.G. (1984). Soil water storage in a semi-arid Eucalyptus
populnea woodland invaded by woody shrubs, and the effects of
shrub clearing and ringbarking. Aust. Rangel. J. '6, ,75-85. I
Johnson, R.W. and Burrows, W.H. (1981). Acacia open-forests, woodlands
and shrublands. In Australian Vegetation. (ed. R.H. Grove).
pp. 198-226. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
Johnson, C.W. and Gordon N.D. (1988). Runoff and erosion from rainfall
simulator plots on Sagebrush Rangeland. Trans. Am. Soc. &ric.
Eng. 31, 421-427.
Kemper, W.D., and Rosenau, R.C., (1986). Aggregate stability and size
distribution. In 'Methods of Soil Analyses, Part 1'. 2nd Edn.
(ed. A. Klute.) Monogr. No. 9. (Am. Soc. Agron:' Madison,
Wisconsin).
Lobry de Bruyn, L.A. (1990). The role of termites and ants in soil
modification: a review. Aust . J. Soil Res. 28, 55-93.
Loveday, J. (1974). Methods of analysis of irrigated soils. Bur. Soils
Tech. Commun. No. 54.
Lyford, F. and Qashu, H. (1969). Infiltration rates as affected by
desert vegetation. Water Resour. Res. 5, 1373-1376.
Mabutt, J.A. and Fanning, P.C. (1987). Vegetation banding in arid
Western Australia. J . Arid Environ. 12, 41-59.
Moore, E.D., Burch, G.J., and Wallbrink, P.J. (1986). Preferential
flow and hydraulic conductivity of forest soils. Soil Sci.
Soc. An. J. 50, 876-881.
1 Neldner, V.J. (1986). Vegetatipn of the Australian mulga lands. In The
2 Mulga Lands. (ed. P.S. Sattler). pp. 20-26. Royal Society of
3 Queensland, North Quay. - - - .
. - .. . 4 ~orthcote, K.H. ; ;~ubble,' G.D., - Isbell, R.F., fhompson, C.H., and
5 Bettenay, F. (1975). 'A description of Australian soils'
6 CSIRO Australia.
7 ! Noy-Meir, I. (1985). Desert ecosystem structure and function. In I
8 'Ecosystems of the World. Vol 12A. Hot deserts and Arid
9 shrublandsf.'(eds. M. Evenari, I. Noy-Meir and D.W. Goodall).
10 pp. 93-103. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
1 1 'Oades, J.M. (1984). Soil organic matter and structural stability:
12 mechanisms and implications for management. Plant and soil,
14 Perroux, K.M., and White, I. (1988). Designs for disc permeameters.
15 Soil Sci. SOC. An. J. 52, 1205-1215. .
16 Scholte, T.S. (1989). Vegetation-soil relations in an area with sealed
17 Chromic Luvisols, Kenya. Arid Soil Res. and Rehab. 3, 337-348.
18 Slatyer, R.O. (1961). Methodology of a water balance study conducted
19 on a desert woodland (Acacia aneura F. Muell.) cornunity in
20 Central Australia UNESCO Arid Zone Research 16, 15-26.
21 Soil Conservation Service of N.S.W. (1983). Land systems series
2 2 sheet SH 55-9, Louth, N.S.W. Central Mapping Authority,
23 Bathurst.
2 4 Stace, H.C.T., Hubble, G.D., Brewer, R., Northcote, K.H., Sleeman,
25 J.R., Mulcahy, M.J., and Hallsworth, E.G. (1968). 'A handbook
2 6 of Australian Soils.' (Rellem: Glenside, S.A.)
Thurow, T.L., Blackburn, W.H., and Taylor, Jr., C.A. (1988).
Infiltration and interrill erosion responses t'o selected
livestock grazing strategies, Edwards Plateau, Texas. J. Range .- -.
Managemt. 41, 296-302.
Tisdall, J.M., and Oades, J.M. (1982). Organic matter and water-stable
aggregates in soils. J. Soil Sci. 33, 141-163. !
Tongway, D.J., Ludwig, J.A., and Whitford, W.G. (1989). Yulga log
mounds: Fertile patches in the semi-arid woodlands of eastern
Australia. Aust. J . Ecol. 14 (in press).
Tongway, D.J., and Ludwig, J.A. (1990). Vegetation and soil patterning
in semi-arid mulga lands of eastern Australia. Aust. J. Ecol.
15, 23-34.
Twine, J.R., and Williams, C.H. (1967). Determination of nitrogen in
soils by automatic chemical analysis. CSIRO Aust. Div. Plant
Ind., Field Sta. Rec. No. 6, 61-7.
Warren, S.D., Thurow, T.L., Blackburn, W.H., and Garza, N.E. (1986).
The influence of livestock trampling under intensive rotation
grazing on soil hydrologic characteristics. J. Range Managemt.
39, 491-495.
White, I. (1988). Tillage practices and soil hydraulic properties:
Why quantify the obvious? In National Soils Conference Review
Papers Canberra, May 1988. (ed. J. Loveday) pp. 87-126. Aust.
Soc. Soil Sci. Inc.).
Williams, J., and Bonell, M. (1988). The influence of scale of
measurement on the spatial and temporal variability of the
Philip Infiltration Parameters - an experimental study in an
Australian Savannah woodland. J. Hydrol. 104, 33-51.
FIGURE .'CAPTIONS:
Fig I . Distribution of water-stable aggregates obtained after wet - . - - -. -
sieving. Bars represent standard errors of the mean.
Fig 2. Photomicrographs of thin-sections from the three geomorphic
zones.
! t (a) Runoff zone (b) Interception zone (c) Mulga grove
Fig 3. SEM micrographs of the soil surface from the three
geomorphic zones.
(a) Runoff zone
(b) Interception zone
(c ) Mulga grove. Note the large pore'>100 diameter (arrow)
Table 1: SOME PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF A TYPICAL R]~D EARTH PROFILE
AT THE LAKE MERE EXPERIMENTAL SITE . .
DEPTH PH EC BULK DENSITY PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS (%)
(cm) (1:5) (1:5) 0% m-3) <.ooz .doz i .02- .2-
(yscm-') mm . 0 2 m . 2 m 2.0m
Table 2: AGGREGATE STABILITY (MUD), , SOIL SURFACE RESISTANCE BULK DENSITY,
ORGANIC CARBON ( % ) AND TOTAL NITROGEN ( % ) FOR THE THRICE
GEOMORF'HIC ZONES AT LAKE MERE. - .
- ~- . - .. . - - - .
Each measurement i s a mean o f t h i r t y s i x r e p l i c a t e s . Means fol lowed by t h e
same l e t t e r a r e n o t s i g n i f i c a n t l y d i f f e r e n t a t P=0.05
I
I
S o i l Proper ty Runoff Zone I n t e r c e p t i o n Zone Mulga Zone
Mean weight d i m . 305.7=
S o i l sur face r e s i s t . (MPa) 3.9Ga
Bulk d e n s i t y (Mg m-3) 1 . 4nb
(0-2cm)
Organic Carbon (%) 0.67'
T o t a l n i t rogen (%) 0.08'
Table 3. Volumetric wa te r c o n t e n t s of t h e t h r e e zones a t a range of
m a t r i c p o t e n t i a l s
- . . . -. Means fo~llowed by t h e same let ter a r e -not s & n i f i c a n t l y d i f f e r e n t a t P = O . O ~
Matr ic P o t e n t i a l (yo) Volumetric water c o n t e n t (cm3 cmk3)
@Pa) Runoff Zone I n t e r c e p t i o n Zone Mulga Grove
Table 4. Volumetric water content drained in the matric potential range of 0
to -0.3 kPa and -0.3 to -3.0 kPa for the 0-50 mm depth of the three
zones. - -. - .
- . - . . . . - - - . .
Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different
Drainage Range Change in volumetric water content (cm3 crnF3)
(kpa) Runoff zone Interception Zone Mulga Grove
Figure 1 . Distribution of water stable aggregates obtained after wet sieving
c' . - 0 ' 0) 8 0 0 Runoff Slope - Intercept. Zone 0 - BEE! Mulga Grove 0 u
x V
60 . 0 aJ
-C/
o cn a~ 40 L 0
2 - 20 _D 0
4-J
v, L a, Y
n 0
I Size of Aggregates (mrn)
. .. ~ . . .~ ~ .. ... .
Figure 2a. U 10 m
Figure 2b. U 10 m
Figure 2 c . U 10 m
Figure 3a.
F igu re 3b.
F igure 3 c .
Recommended