View
244
Download
2
Category
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Sample pages from 'The Knights of Malta: A Modern Resurrection'
Citation preview
Third Millennium Publishing
3 Holford Yard Bevin WayLondon wc1x 9hd
United Kingdom
T: +44 (0)20 7841 6300E: info@tmiltd.comwww.tmiltd.com
About the Author
H. J. A. Sire is a graduate in Modern History of Exeter
College, Oxford. He is known for his major work
The Knights of Malta (Yale University Press, 1994),
and has published articles on various aspects of the
Order, besides other works of Catholic history and
biography. He is a Knight of Malta and has been
resident in Rome since 2013 as historian of the
Order.
About the Publisher
Third Millennium has an international reputation
for producing illustrated books of the highest quality
for leading heritage, educational, legal and military
institutions. These include titles for and about: The
Sovereign Order of Malta; Durham Cathedral, York
Minster and Lincoln Cathedral; the universities of
Cambridge, Durham, Manchester, Newcastle and
Oxford; Harrow School, Rugby School, Lady Eleanor
Holles School and Withington Girls’ School; Sandhurst,
the Guards, the Royal Artillery and the Brigade of
Gurkhas. In 2015, Third Millennium is proud to be
producing 800th anniversary portraits of both Magna
Carta and the Lord Mayor’s Show.The remarkable story of how the most famous of the
venerable Christian military orders recovered from
near extinction to resurgence and immortality
After centuries of distinguished service in defence of the
Christian faith in Europe and the Holy Land, the Order of St
John faced extinction when in 1798 the Maltese islands were
surrendered to Napoleonic France and the Knights expelled from
their territory. As the Order departed into exile, the heroic days
of the Crusades seemed lost for ever.
THE KNIGHTS OF MALTAA
Modern
Resurrection
H.J.A
. Sire
www.tmiltd.com
Third Millennium Publishing
THEKNIGHTSOF MALTAA Modern Resurrection
H.J.A. Sire THEKNIGHTSOF MALTAA Modern Resurrection
The history of the Order of Malta from
the French Revolutionary period to the
present day
H. J. A. Sire gives an unflinching account of the
Order’s hardships and loss – in which its very
existence was threatened as much by internal
dissensions and personal ambitions as by the
vicissitudes of fortune – and the long, patient
process of recovery which saw the Order open
its membership more widely and return to its
founding vocation of care for Christian pilgrims.
Now over nine hundred years old, the Order
boasts a vibrant, growing membership and a
proud record of charitable works across the world.
Cover images:
(Front) Celebration of the 900th anniversary of the
Order of Malta at St Peter’s in 2013
(Back, upper) The Sovereign Council in 2012, painted by
Andrew Festing, former President of the Royal Society
of Portrait Painters, and brother of the Grand Master Fra
Matthew Festing
(Back, lower) Castle of Magione
UK £35 / US $49.95
Knights_Of_Malta_Jacket-concept_REV3.indd 1 23/12/2015 12:23
Chapter 1
1
The Order of St John before 1798
Origins and developmentTo read a potted history of the first seven centuries of the Order of St John would probably tire
the attention of those who have a nodding acquaintance with the subject; but the purpose of
this chapter is to bring out various aspects with a particular bearing on the Order’s plight after
the fall of Malta in 1798, or on its development since then. The Order originated in a hospice
for pilgrims in Jerusalem, established, probably before 1071, by merchants of the Italian trading
state of Amalfi. The hospice stood on a site associated from antiquity with the life of St John
the Baptist, and was dedicated to that saint. Its founder was an energetic and saintly man called
Gerard, who was described in his memorial verses as “the humblest man among the dwellers
in the East”. When he began his task, Jerusalem was still under Moslem rule, but in 1099 its
position vis-à-vis Western Christendom was transformed by the arrival of the First Crusade,
which conquered the Holy City and set up the Latin states along the Levantine coast. With the
vastly increased flow of pilgrims from the West, Gerard rose to the occasion, and within a few
years the Hospital of St John was, next to the Holy Sepulchre itself, the most important of the
Christian institutions in Jerusalem. Pope Paschal II recognised its status in 1113 by issuing the
Bull Pie Postulatio Voluntatis, which set up Gerard’s foundation as an independent institution
exempt from episcopal authority. The buildings in Jerusalem grew prodigiously until they
covered a square of 150 yards, dominating the Christian quarter of the city. The new Hospital
built in the middle of the century was a vast hall measuring 80 yards by 40, divided into aisles
by 124 marble columns. In 1172 the monk Theoderic described it as follows:
No-one can credibly tell another how beautiful its buildings are, how abundantly
it is supplied with rooms and beds and other materials for the use of poor and sick
people, how rich it is in the means of refreshing the poor, and how devotedly it
labours to maintain the needy, unless he has the opportunity of seeing it with his
own eyes. Indeed, we passed through this palace, and were unable by any means to
discover the number of sick people lying there, but we saw that the beds numbered
more than one thousand. It is not every one even of the most powerful kings and
despots who could maintain as many people as that house does every day1.
The first purpose of the Hospital was to house poor pilgrims who came to the Holy City, and
the original vocation that Gerard taught his followers was service of “Our Lords the Poor”. But
The Knights of Malta
3
and the knights were driven back to the castle of Margat, in the County of Tripoli. For nearly
three years after the death of Roger des Moulins the Order was unable to elect a new Master. Its
Grand Commander, Borrell, took over the government, and he was joined in October 1187 by
Ermengard d’Asp, who in the following year took up sole rule as “Provisor” of the Order until
the election in 1189 or 1190 of Garnier de Naplous, who came out from France with the armies
of the Third Crusade. The recovery of Jerusalem proved beyond the crusaders, but in 1192
they were able to reconquer Acre, and here the Order resumed service of its hospital, second in
greatness only to the one it had lost in Jerusalem. Margat, with its extensive lands near Tripoli,
remained for the moment the Order’s military headquarters, until some years later the Masters
saw fit to settle its central Convent in Acre, the new capital of the Kingdom of Jerusalem.
In 1206 the Statutes of Margat formalised for the first time the Hospital’s character as
a military order, with a tripartite division of chaplains, knights and sergeants-at-arms. The
knights were required to be of noble birth, the sergeants of respectable family, and they
constituted the officer corps and the non-commissioned officers of the army that the Order
maintained in the East. In the 1230s the knights were given precedence over the priests, and
soon all the chief offices of the Order, except that of Prior of the Church, were reserved to
them. By this time the phenomenon of the military orders, all displaying a similar structure,
was well established in Europe. The Templars and Hospitallers were supplemented by national
foundations: those of Spain and Portugal, which played a special role in the reconquest of the
Crac des Chevaliers, the most powerful of the castles that the Knights Hospitaller manned in the Holy Land during the age of the Crusader states
The Knights of Malta
11
Langue Date Knights Date Knights
Provence 1631 272 1787 401
Auvergne 1631 143 1787 222
France 1631 361 1787 475
Aragon 1631 110 1796 161
Italy 1631 584 1789 652
Castile 1631 239 1791/4 135
Germany 1631 46 1785 82
Total 1631 1,755 1785/96 2,128
The three French Langues showed an increase of eighty-one knights just in the previous nine
years. Of the 2,128 knights listed, some 900 were under twenty-five; of these, more than half
were boys under eighteen – not, therefore, effective members of the Order, but a healthy sign
of its recruitment for the future. It is worth noting that only 494 of the adult knights were
professed3.
In response to the rise in recruitment, the Order increased the number of its commanderies,
partly by division of existing ones and also by the acquisition in 1776 of the Order of Canons
of St Anthony of Vienne. This created some forty commanderies, mainly in France, with a total
revenue of about 200,000 livres. The Order was also able to take possession, after many years
of misappropriation, of a large property in Poland, and thus to found in the same year a new
Grand Priory of Poland, with eight commanderies of juspatronat* and six ordinary ones. A more
valuable foundation, since not burdened with family rights, was that of the Grand Priory of
Bavaria, with twenty-eight commanderies, made in 1780 by the Elector Charles Theodore from
the property of the suppressed Jesuit Order. These two foundations, which brought the total of
the Order’s Priories to twenty-two, were combined in the new Anglo-Bavarian Langue, a revival
of the Langue of England that was decreed in 1782 with the old office of Turcopolier returned
to it. In the same line we may note the decision by Frederick the Great of Prussia in 1763 to
restore the Protestantised Grand Bailiwick of Brandenburg (a mediaeval division of the German
Priory) to unity with the Order. As its commanders were Protestant, they did not become full
brethren, but they resumed payment of responsions to the Convent in Malta.
* These were endowments created with the perpetual right reserved to the family of the founder to appoint the commander (who must nevertheless be a qualified Knight of Justice). Such foundations became particularly common in the nineteenth century, and remain in existence today.
* The Priory of Castile listed sixty-five knights, most of them under twenty-five, who had not made their proofs of nobility. It is questionable whether such persons were regarded as members by the other Priories and included in their lists; if so, the numbers for the Langue of Castile ought to be raised to 199. In either case, this Langue is exceptional in having shrunk considerably since 1631, for the importance to Spain of the struggle against the Moslems raised it to an unusual size during the sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries.
† An unusually low number owing to the Thirty Years’ War.
*†
The Knights of Malta
7
out against a Turkish army of 40,000, until on 8 September the siege was raised by a Spanish
relieving force. By this feat of arms, the Order redeemed the sad memory of the loss of Rhodes
and founded such a legend that two centuries later Voltaire would write: “Nothing is better
known than the Siege of Malta.” As they developed their island in increasing strength and
splendour, the knights could rely on a prestige that made their Order the epitome of chivalry
and nobiliary virtue for the aristocracies of Europe.
The structure of the OrderSince the middle of the fifteenth century the Order of St John was divided into eight national
groups called Langues, which formed the basis of the knights’ residence in the Convent, first
at Rhodes and then in Malta. The lodging of each Langue was called its Auberge, over which
presided the head of the Langue, called the Pilier. The high offices of the Order, with their
respective responsibilities, were reserved to the Piliers, according to the following precedence:
1 Grand Commander (Langue of Provence): the treasury.
2 Marshal (Langue of Auvergne): the armed forces, and the army in particular.
3 Hospitaller (Langue of France): the hospital.
4 Conservator (Langue of Aragon): clothing and material supply.
5 Admiral (Langue of Italy): the navy.
6 Turcopolier (Langue of England until 1582; revived as the Anglo-Bavarian Langue in
1783): the coastal watchtowers.
7 Chancellor (Langue of Castile): chancery and foreign affairs.
8 Grand Bailiff (Langue of Germany): fortifications.
As far as the European organisation of the Order went, the Langues were groupings of several
local Priories, usually known by the eighteenth century as Grand Priories; their number stood
at twenty after the losses of the Reformation, which included the whole of the Langue of
England. Each Priory comprised a number of commanderies, distributed fairly evenly about
Europe. They were conferred on knights who had qualified by service and seniority, while
a minority of commanderies, of lesser value, were reserved for chaplains and sergeants-at-
arms. In addition, most Priories included one or two Bailiwicks, endowments of special value
reserved for Grand Crosses.
Every applicant wishing to be admitted as a knight had to submit his proofs of nobility –
in the Continental sense, equivalent to English gentry – to the Grand Priory in whose territory
he lived. Since 1550 the minimum requirement was nobility of all four of the candidate’s
grandparents, while in the French Langues it was eight “quarters” and in Germany sixteen.
After payment of his “passage money” and other dues, a knight could repair to Malta at the
age of fifteen and begin his year’s novitiate. This included weekly service in the Hospital, which
in Malta as in Rhodes formed the prominent symbol of the Order’s vocation. The knight was
then obliged to perform four years’ caravans, which were campaigns of at least six months
18
THE FALL OF MALTA AND THE RUSSIAN USURPATIONChapter 2
his family. The choices of patron were in fact
narrowed down to Naples and the German
Empire, and for reasons that we have seen,
the protection of Naples was more to be
feared than welcomed. That is why by 1797
it was considered certain that Rohan would
be succeeded by a German Grand Master.
This implied a very limited choice
indeed. Owing partly to the small size of the
Langue, no German had ever been elected
Grand Master of the Order. From 1791, when
Rohan suffered his stroke, an observer in
Malta would have seen a choice of just two
German Grand Crosses resident in the island:
Franz von Schönau, who was the Pilier of the
Langue, and Ferdinand von Hompesch, the
imperial ambassador. Then, seven months
before Rohan’s death, Schönau left for his
own country and Hompesch succeeded
him as Pilier, becoming the only candidate
available. This was a fatal predicament.
Hompesch was simply a minor diplomat,
weak in character, and a man whose career
had shown a consistent subservience to his
sovereign in detriment to the interests of the Order. When Rohan died in July 1797, the Order
thus found its choice restricted to the worst superior it could possibly have elected.
The conquests of the French revolutionaries made their annexationist aims very obvious.
Just before the election of Hompesch, France had conquered the Republic of Venice and its
possessions of the Ionian Islands, thus placing itself within striking distance of Malta. Yet in
the eleven months of his reign Hompesch devoted himself to cultivating his popularity at
home without making any attempt to prepare his island against attack. Schönau, who was
representative of the Order at the Congress of Rastadt in 1798, warned him unequivocally that
the French intended to seize Malta and urged him to take precautions, but the Grand Master
preferred to pay no heed. This inactivity, coming after the six years of enfeebled government
during Rohan’s illness, was fatal to the morale of the island. General Bonaparte had been
commissioned by the Directory to lead an expedition to Egypt, and to seize Malta on the way
so as to give France a naval base in the central Mediterranean. Nelson was cruising off Toulon
to stop any such departure, but Bonaparte gave him the slip, and on 6 June 1798 he appeared
off Malta with a fleet of between 500 and 600 vessels carrying an army of 29,000 men. When
Ferdinand von Hompesch, the last Grand Master of the Order in Malta
28
100 Miles500
Showing the location ofthe Order’s Conventsince 1798 (in bold).
The frontiers shownare those between 1815and 1860.
Map of Italy
A U S T R I A N E M P I R E
KI
NG
DO
M
OF
S
AR
DI
NI
A
Milan
ELBA LISSA
PARMA
MO
DEN
A
T U S C A N Y
PA PA LS TAT E S
K I N G D O M
O F T H E
T W O
S I C I L I E S
A F R I C A
CORSICA(to France)
Ferrara1826–31
Trieste1798–99
Maltauntil 1798
Catania1809–26
Civitavecchia
Romefrom 1834Romefrom 1834
Messina1803–04
Ferrara1826–31
Trieste1798–99
Maltauntil 1798
Catania1809–26
Messina1803–04
LESINA
40
Chapter 4 FAILURES WITHIN
Andrea di Giovanni, Lieutenant of the Order 1814–21 Amabile Vella, Vice-Chancellor of the Order 1814–31
Antonio Miari, the Order’s envoy in Vienna 1814–23 Josef-Maria von Colloredo-Wallsee, Grand Prior of Bohemia 1791–1818
The Knights of Malta
49
a conceptual blunder that was all too common at the time – it treated the restoration of the
Order as something that depended on the decision of the Congress, and asked the Congress
to beg the Pope to appoint a Grand Master. By this false step Miari reduced the Order from an
equal party treating with the other sovereigns to one of the many lobbyists and petitioners that
were pestering the Congress for their interests. Hannonville’s memoir, which was circulated
after Miari’s, was a more forward-looking document, emphasising the future value of the Order
to the European states as a defence against Barbary piracy and as a nursery of sailors.
Another difference between the two documents was their treatment of territorial
compensation. The original instructions to the Order’s delegates, written in February 1814, had
told them to reclaim the island of Malta, under the terms of the Treaty of Amiens; but that had
been superseded in May by the Treaty of Paris, which accorded Malta definitively to Britain.
We should remember that at this time Murat was still King of Naples and Napoleon was being
provided with the nominally independent island of Elba; in those conditions Britain could
not relinquish its naval base in the central Mediterranean*. The same circumstance should
remind us that the purpose of the Congress of Vienna at this initial stage was not a general
restoration of legitimacy but the settlement of Europe on the basis of uti possidetis. Miari,
when he took over as the Lieutenancy’s chief delegate, decided not to attempt the recovery of
Malta, so as not to set Britain irrevocably against the Order, and the same judgment was made
by the French petitioners of the Congress. It was a question therefore of what territory might
be claimed as a compensation. A number of possibilities were mentioned, but by far the most
likely were the old Venetian possessions of the Ionian Islands. These had been set up in 1800
as an independent republic under Russian protection, had been ceded to France by the Treaty
of Tilsit, and reconquered by Britain between 1809 and 1814. The British did not really know
what to do with them (they eventually handed over the islands to Greece in 1859 after forty-
five years of protectorate), and were considering various candidates to whom to cede them,
including Russia and Austria. There was widespread public opinion that this was the obvious
place to put the Knights of St John.
If the Order had received the Ionian Islands, it would certainly have been a handsome
compensation for the loss of Malta. The archipelago had a territory of nearly 1,000 square
miles and a well-fortified capital at Corfu, which had been the seat of the Venetian governor.
Though not so well situated as Malta, it was a possible place from which to resume the war
against Barbary piracy, which was still far from obsolete. The British had made little attempt
to take up the knights’ protective role in Malta except in the interest of their own trade, and
the corsair war had revived, especially against the shipping of the lesser European states. One
of the most colourful figures at the Congress of Vienna was the English admiral Sir Sidney
* The corollary was that, once Napoleon was out of Elba and Naples restored to Bourbon rule in 1815, Britain would have cheerfully given up Malta in exchange for Minorca. This, however, had only been annexed in the eighteenth century as a prize of war with Spain, and could not be claimed now that Spain was an ally.
90
Chapter 5 THE GREEK ADVENTURE
A faulty LieutenantSainte-Croix also acted as an amanuensis for Dienne, his casually elegant handwriting replacing
the Commander’s scrawl. On 3 January 1823 Dienne wrote a long letter to Vella, whom he still
regarded as a trusted friend, expressing his conclusions about the fiasco at Verona. The bulk
of the letter is in Sainte-Croix’s hand, and it makes the following denunciation: Dienne had
already written on the subject to the Lieutenant, and had received no reply.
This announces an indifference towards the Langues of France which must impel
us to look no longer but to ourselves for the means of salvation that remain to
us. Weigh that at headquarters, my dear Commander*, for I have had on various
occasions to exercise to no small extent my patience and my rhetoric to restrain
within just limits the discontent of the majority of our leading knights ...
Six or eight months before the Congress, I wrote to headquarters about the need
to figure suitably there. The reply was that the approval of the high Powers was
awaited to form the legation … Being unable to remain in uncertainty in that
regard, I wrote myself to the principal Courts of Europe, from whom I received
the assurance that no representatives of the Order, avowed or secret, had made
any proposals on the matter, for they would certainly not have been left without
result … I am obliged to think that nothing important in diplomacy was ever
seriously attempted, and that it is very natural therefore that we should remain
forgotten, since we are incapable of helping ourselves. On the other hand, if the
headquarters had undertaken negotiations, what reasons would there have been
not to inform us of them? The French Langues and those of Aragon and Castile
who have delegated their powers to us, were they not a sufficiently weighty part
of the Order to have a part in general affairs?
... If we had remained inactive, we should know nothing today of what concerns
us, and without our decision to send our own envoys to the source of power
in Verona we should have had to believe, when we learnt that our Venerable
Lieutenant and our worthy Bailli Miari had not appeared at the Congress, what
had become of the Order, and that the foreign Powers had no thought of us at
all. But it is quite otherwise, and our Envoy, who enjoyed the full intimacy of
Prince Metternich and the high protection of the Sovereigns, received the most
favourable overtures, and a decision would have been taken on the proposals
that were made to them if the heads of the Order had been so placed as to
respond to them personally. The road that the Order has followed until this time
* Vella had by this time been invested with the commandery of Mugnano in central Italy.
The Knights of Malta
123
At any rate, if the Convent could not
move to Civitavecchia or to Rome, neither
could it remain in Ferrara, and Ciccolini
formally ordered its closure by a letter of 15
October 1831*. In the Balì Trotti’s opinion,
this measure would not have been necessary
if Busca had heeded his advice and avoided
the recent extravagances. For the next three
years the Order had no Convent of knights,
a misfortune which had only occurred twice
before in its history, after the fall of Jerusalem
in 1187 and after the dispersal of the Convent
of Trieste in 1799. A consequence was that
no statutory Council could be formed and
no decrees could be issued, including those
admitting Knights of Justice or of Devotion.
For Italy, this hardly mattered, since Busca
anyway refused all receptions, but it would
not do for Bohemia, whose Grand Priory, it
was feared, might take the occasion to secede.
A brief was therefore requested from the Pope, and granted on 20 December, empowering the
Lieutenant to govern the Order alone and issue all necessary decrees on his own authority, and
this became the legal basis of the Order’s government for the next fourteen years40.
In his eagerness to help the knights, Gregory XVI also proposed at this time to restore
the Grand Mastership, the favour which had been so constantly denied by Pius VII and which
Busca ever since had failed to request; but the Lieutenant refused the offer with derision. Such
a head, he wrote, could be no more than a playing-card king41. That, indeed, was the phantom
state to which the Order had been reduced by Busca’s own incapacity.
After the death of Vella, Busca’s defeatism deepened even further than before, and his
last three years are empty of events, other than the refusal of opportunities. Gregory XVI
waited for the Lieutenant’s death, which could not be far off. In December 1833 Busca fell ill in
Milan, and the Pope was asked for a brief authorising the Vice-Chancellor to govern the Order
with interim powers. Busca recovered, and between January and April 1834 he resumed his
correspondence, but after a final illness he died on 19 May.
So ended the worst twenty years in the history of the Order of Malta, a time in which its
misfortunes came not from external blows but from the faults of its own government, which
* In practice, the only knights who had come back into residence after the summer recess were the two Borgia brothers, and one may regard the Convent of Ferrara as closed from Vella’s death on 27 May.
Pope Gregory XVI (reigned 1831–46)
The Magistral election of 1988, in the Chapter Hall of the Aventine Villa
The icon of Our Lady of Filermo, rediscovered in 1997 The Order’s castle of Magione, in central Italy
The seize quartiers of the present Grand Master. The genealogical tree shows, under Continental rules, the sixteen armigerous great-great-grandparents of Fra Matthew Festing (in practice fourteen, since his paternal grandparents were first cousins). In the arms of Fra Matthew’s mother, Mary Riddell, the artist has also shown all the quarterings to which the Riddells are entitled under English heraldic rules. The ordinary form of the Riddell arms is shown in the top line
The Spanish ambassador presents his credentials to Grand Master Fra Matthew Festing in the State Drawing Room of the Magistral Palace
Recommended