Valid and Invalid Arguments M260 2.3. Argument An argument is a sequence of statements. The final...

Preview:

Citation preview

Valid and Invalid Arguments

M260 2.3

Argument

• An argument is a sequence of statements. The final statement is called the conclusion, the others are called the premises.

= “therefore” before the conclusion.

Logical Form

• If Socrates is a human being, then Socrates is mortal;Socrates is a human being; Socrates is mortal.

• If p then q;p;q

Valid Argument

• An argument form is valid means no matter what particular statements are substituted for the statement variables, if the resulting premises are all true, then the conclusion is also true.

• An argument is valid if its form is valid.

Test for Validity

• Identify premises and conclusion

• Construct a truth table including all premises and conclusion

• Find rows with premises true (critical rows)

• If conclusion is true on all critical rows, argument is valid

• Otherwise argument is invalid

Argument Validity TestExample 1

• p (q r)• ~r p q

premises conclusion

p q r q r p(qr) ~r p q

T T T

T T F

T F T

T F F

F T T

F T F

F F T

F F F

premises conclusion

p q r q r p(qr) ~r p q

T T T T T F T

T T F T T T T

T F T T T F T

T F F F T T T

F T T T T F T

F T F T T T T

F F T T T F F

F F F F F T F

premises conclusion

p q r q r p(qr) ~r p q

T T T T T F T

T T F T T T T

T F T T T F T

T F F F T T T

F T T T T F T

F T F T T T T

F F T T T F F

F F F F F T F

Argument Validity TestExample 2

• p q ~r

• q p r p r

premises conclusion

p q r ~ r q~r pr pq~r qpr p r

T T T

T T F

T F T

T F F

F T T

F T F

F F T

F F F

premises conclusion

p q r ~ r q~r pr pq~r qpr p r

T T T F T T T T T

T T F T T F T F F

T F T F F T F T T

T F F T T F T T F

F T T F T F T F T

F T F T T F T F T

F F T F F F T T T

F F F T T F T T T

premises conclusion

p q r ~ r q~r pr pq~r qpr p r

T T T F T T T T T

T T F T T F T F F

T F T F F T F T T

T F F T T F T T F

F T T F T F T F T

F T F T T F T F T

F F T F F F T T T

F F F T T F T T T

Rules of Inference(Valid Argument Forms)

• Modus Ponens• Modus Tolens• Generalization• Specialization

• Elimination• Transitivity• Division into Cases• Rule of Contradiction

Modus Ponens

• If p then q;

• p; q

Modus Ponens

premises conclusion

p q pq p q

T T

T F

F T

F F

Modus Ponens

premises conclusion

p q pq p q

T T T T T

T F F T F

F T T F T

F F T F F

Modus Ponens

premises conclusion

p q pq p q

T T T T T

T F F T F

F T T F T

F F T F F

Modus Ponens Example

• If the last digit of this number is 0, then the number is divisible by 10.

• The last digit of this number is a 0. This number is divisible by 10.

Modus Tollens

• If p then q;

• ~q; ~p

Modus Tollens

premises conclusion

p q pq ~q ~p

T T

T F

F T

F F

Modus Tollens

premises conclusion

p q pq ~q ~p

T T T F F

T F F T F

F T T F T

F F T T T

Modus Tollens

premises conclusion

p q pq ~q ~p

T T T F F

T F F T F

F T T F T

F F T T T

Modus Tollens Example

• If Zeus is human, then Zeus is mortal.

• Zeus is not mortal. Zeus is not human

• Modus tollens uses the contrapositive.

Generalization

• p pq

• q pq

Specialization

• pq p

• pq q

Elimination

• pq• ~q p

• p q• ~p q

Transitivity

• pq

• qrpr

Division into Cases

• pq• pr

• qrr

Division into Cases Example

• x>1 or x<-1

• If x>1 then x2>1

• If x<-1 then x2>1 x2>1

Valid Inference ExampleStatements a, b, c.

• a. If my glasses are on the kitchen table, then I saw them at breakfast.

• b. I was reading the newspaper in the living room or I was reading the newspaper in the kitchen.

• c. If I was reading the newspaper in the living room, then my glasses are on the coffee table.

Valid Inference ExampleStatements a, b, c.

• a. If my glasses are on the kitchen table, then I saw them at breakfast.

• b. I was reading the newspaper in the living room or I was reading the newspaper in the kitchen.

• c. If I was reading the newspaper in the living room, then my glasses are on the coffee table.

Valid Inference ExampleSymbols p, q, r, s, t.

• p = My glasses are on the kitchen table.

• q = I saw my glasses at breakfast.

• r = I was reading the newspaper in the living room

• s = I was reading the newspaper in the kitchen.

• t = My glasses are on the coffee table.

Statements a, b, cin Symbols

• a. p q

• b. r s• c. r t

Valid Inference ExampleStatements d, e, f.

• d. I did not see my glasses at breakfast.

• e. If I was reading my book in bed, then my glasses are on the bed table.

• f. If I was reading the newspaper in the kitchen, then my glasses are on the kitchen table.

Valid Inference ExampleStatements d, e, f.

• d. I did not see my glasses at breakfast.

• e. If I was reading my book in bed, then my glasses are on the bed table.

• f. If I was reading the newspaper in the kitchen, then my glasses are on the kitchen table.

Valid Inference ExampleSymbols u, v.

• u =I was reading my book in bed.

• v = My glasses are on the bed table.

Statements d, e, fin Symbols

• d. ~q

• e. u v

• f. s p

Inference Example Givens

• a. p q• b. r s• c. r t

• d. ~q• e. u v• f. s p

Deduction Sequence

• 1. p q from ( )~q from ( ) ~p by __________

• 2. s p from ( )~p from ( ) ~s by__________

Deduction Sequence

• 1. p q from (a)~q from (d) ~p by modus tollens

• 2. s p from (f)~p from (1) ~s by modus tollens

Deduction Sequence

• 3. r s from ( )~s from ( ) r by_____________

• 4. r tfrom ( )r from ( ) t by_____________

Deduction Sequence

• 3. r s from (b)~s from (2) r by disjunctive syllogism

• 4. r tfrom (c)r from (3) t by modus ponens

Errors in Reasoning

• Using vague or ambiguous premises.

• Circular reasoning

• Jumping to conclusions

• Converse error

• Inverse error

Converse Error

• If Zeke is a cheater, then Zeke sits in the back row. Zeke sits in the back row. Zeke is a cheater.

• pqq p

Inverse Error

• If interest rates are going up,then stock market prices will go down.Interest rates are not going up Stock market prices will not go down.

• pq~p ~q

Inverse Error

• If I intend to sell my house, then I will need a permit for this wall.I do not intend to sell my house. I do not need a permit for this wall.

• pq~p ~q

Validity vs. Truth

• Valid arguments can have false conclusions if one of the premises is false.

• Invalid arguments can have true conclusions.

Valid but False

• If John Lennon was a rock starthen John Lennon had red hair.

• John Lennon was a rock star. John Lennon had red hair.

Invalid but True

• If New York is a big city,then New York has tall buildings.

• New York has tall buildings. New York is a big city.

Contradiction Rule

• If the supposition that p is false leads to a contradiction then p is true.

• ~p c, where c is a contradiction. p

Contradiction Rule

• If the supposition that p is false leads to a contradiction then p is true.

• ~p c, where c is a contradiction. p

premise conclusion

p ~p c ~pc p

T F F T T

F T F F F

Rule of Contradiction Example

• Knights tell the truth, Knaves lie.

• A says: “B is a knight.”

• B says: “A and I are opposite types.”

• What are A and B?

• (Hint: Suppose A is a Knight.)

Rules of Inference(Valid Argument Forms)

• Modus Ponens• Modus Tolens• Disjunctive Addition• Conjunctive

Simplification

• Disjunctive Syllogism• Hypothetical

Syllogism• Division into Cases• Rule of Contradiction

Recommended