Will 10 Million People Die a Year due to Antimicrobial ...bfb80df4-b8f7-43a4... · - Antibiotic...

Preview:

Citation preview

Will 10 Million People Die a Year due to Antimicrobial Resistance by 2050?

Prof. Stephan HarbarthInfection Control Program

Geneva, Switzerland

Thanks for material provided by Marlieke de Kraker & Andrew Stewardson !

Antibiotic resistance: global public health concern

Tackling drug-resistant infections globally (O’Neill report) - Mai 2016

What are clinical implications of antimicrobial resistance?

• Treatment failure due to wrong choice

– Increased morbidity and mortality

• Use of more toxic, more expensive and less efficacious therapeutic alternatives

• Added burden of nosocomial infections

• Risk of explosive outbreaks

Main Conclusions:

- Antibiotic resistance significantly impacts on illness burden in the community.

- Patients with laboratory-confirmed antibiotic-resistant urinary and respiratory-tract infections are more likely to experience delays in clinical recovery after treatment with antibiotics.

• C. H. (71) first woman elected lieutenant governor in South Dakota.

• She had suffered a spinal fracture and 3 broken ribs Oct. 8 while sailing the Adriatic Sea.

• She underwent surgery in Zagreb, Croatia on Oct. 10, then was hospitalized Oct. 19 during a stop in Switzerland on her way back to the US.

• She suffered pneumonia, a bacterial blood infection, and a series of strokes, which claimed her life in Lausanne, Switzerlandon October 25, 2007.

Deadly MRSA Infection

Acinetobacter Outbreak, Lausanne

• Index patient

– Severe burn injuries, transfer from Bali (Oct2002)

– Multi-R Acinetobacter at admission

• Outbreak

– Spread to 2 patients

– 6 months later: 6 new cases

– Closure of the burn unit

• Environnement

– Widespread contamination: 16/161 (10%) positive swabs

Patients Environnement

► Environmental cleaning & disinfection

► Complete replacement of all disposable material

Zanetti G et al. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007; 28: 723-25

Economic burden of MDROs

• Increased direct costs of providing care to

MDRO-infected patients;

• Indirect costs to patients, caregivers, &

diminished quality of life;

• Infrastructure and productivity costs of

surveillance, screening and isolation;

• Antibiotic treatment costs for therapy or

empiric coverage of MDRO

Projected impact of antimicrobial-resistant neonatal sepsis in India

Apocalypse soon?

Add Raoult, CID headline

AMR burden

“ Data are insufficient to determine full

extent of public health burden associated

with antibacterial resistance.”

US General Accounting Office, 1999Report to U.S. Congress

“ The estimates of the burden caused by

bacterial resistance depend heavily on

unknown parameters.”

Public health burden of drug resistanceC.E. Phelps, Med Care 1989; 27: 194-203

R. Rappuoli. Nat Med 2004.

From Pasteur to genomics: progress and challenges in infectious diseases

Affected people / deaths

Threat level: URGENT

Threat level: SERIOUS

Tackling drug-resistant infections globally (O’Neill report) - Mai 2016

Usability/Business case, O’Neill report

General objective for the AMR review group:

“Defining the steps needed to avoid the AMR crisis”

Objective of this report:

“Determine the health and macro-economic consequences for the world, especially in emerging economies if antimicrobial resistance is not tackled”

Tackling drug-resistant infections globally (O’Neill report) - Mai 2016

De Kraker N, Stewardson A, Harbarth S. PLoS Med 2016; 13: e1002184

Caveats

• Internal validity?

• External validity?

• Assumptions?

• Peer review?

Accurate, with and without random error

In-accurate, with and without random error

De Kraker N, Stewardson A, Harbarth S. PLoS Med 2016; 13: e1002184

Estimating the Burden of Disease (BoD) Related to Antimicrobial Resistance

• Number of infections (I)

• Resistance proportions (R)

• Burden measure: Attributable mortality proportion (M)

BoD= I*R*M

• Future scenarios– Determine coefficient for change (c)

– Future BoD = I*c1 * R*c2 *M*c3

De Kraker N, Stewardson A, Harbarth S. PLoS Med 2016; 13: e1002184

Number of infections (BoD= I*R*M)

EARS-net data: Representativeness?

• Mainly tertiary care hospitals

• Few community/paediatric/LTCF isolates

ECDC, EARS-Net Antimicrobial resistance surveillance report 2013/2014

Resistance proportions (BoD= I*R*M)

EARS-net and WHO data: Representativeness?

• Highly variable blood culture rates

ECDC, EARS-Net Antimicrobial resistance surveillance report 2012/2011*/2009**/2008***/2006

Nu

mb

er

of

sets

/1,0

00

pd

s

Extrapolation from bloodstream infections to infections at other sites

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002; 23: 106-108.

• Fifteen Brooklyn hospitals 1999

•44 ESBL+ K. pneumoniae isolates

• 12 BSIs, 4 SSIs, 14 UTIs, 14 LRTIs:

1 : 0.33 : 1.2 : 1.2

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006; 27: 1264-1266.

• 396-bed hospital in Spain 2002

•33 MRSA isolates

• 4 BSIs, 17 SSIs, 3 UTIs, 5 LRTIs:

1 : 4.3 : 0.8 : 1.3

Attributable mortality (BoD= I*R*M)

ECDC, The bacterial challenge: Time to react 2009

Methodological challenges --Why is it so difficult to estimate

the attributable mortality of AMR-related infection?

Problem 1:

- Severity of illness and underlying disease

PROBLEM

• High crude mortality in patients with infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria

• Carriers of multiresistant bacteria who die in the hospital may die either…– with simple asymptomatic carriage of resistant bacteria

– with infection by resistant bacteria

or

– because of infection (primary cause of death)

Problem 2:

- Appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy

Causal pathways & challenges

Resistant infection Death

Severity of underlying illness

Appropriateness of antibiotics

Mortality prediction in nosocomial bacteremia

McCabe & Jackson. Arch Intern Med. 1962;110:856-864

Freeman J et al. Rev Infect Dis 1988; 10: 1118-1141

Bacteremia Death

Severity of underlying illness:RR = 6.9 – 20.9

Inappropriate antibiotic therapyRR = 1.8 – 4.5

Problem 3:

- Timing of events and time-varying exposures

The importance of correct measurement

When did the antibiotic-resistant infection occur?

Admission

Infected

infection

Non-infected

Discharge

Death

• Cohort study, 2005-2008

• 10 countries, 537 ICUs, 119699 pts

• Sophisticated statistical analyses adjusted for the timing of events and competing outcomes (multistate modelling)

Lambert et al. Lancet Infect Dis 2011

Main findings

• High excess mortality associated with bacteremia and pneumonia acquired in the intensive care unit

• Substantially increased excess length of stay for pneumonia, but not for bloodstream infection

• Pseudomonas aeruginosa: greatest burden (not MRSA)

• AMR: only a small contribution to the overall burden of ICU-acquired infections

Lambert et al. Lancet Infect Dis 2011

Multicenter study (TIMBER)

PopulationPatients with bloodstream infection (BSI) caused by S. aureus or Enterobacteriaceae

Main exposure of interestMethicillin resistance or third-generation cephalosporin resistance

Main comparison groupPatients with infections by susceptible strains

Main outcomesExcess length of stay (LoS) and in-hospital mortality

Stewardson A, …., Harbarth S. EuroSurveillance 2016; 21: 33

= Extended-spectrum betalactamase-producing

Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E)(e.g. E.coli, Klebsiella spp)

Methods

• Design: – Multicentre retrospective cohort study

– 10 European hospitals

• Population: – All acute inpatient admissions

– January 2010 – December 2011

• Data collection:– Demographic, clinical, microbiologic & administrative data were extracted electronically

– One investigator from each site trained in standardized data collection during a workshop

Stewardson A, …., Harbarth S. EuroSurveillance 2016; 21: 33

Statistical methods

• Cox proportional hazards analysis– Compute hazards of inpatient mortality

– Multivariable models• Baseline covariates: for age, sex, elective versus emergent admission,

previous hospitalisation, 17 comorbidities

• Time-varying covariates: bloodstream infection, ICU admission or surgery

• Multistate modeling– Compute excess hospital LoS (days) attributable to each type of BSI

– Accounting for competing risks (discharge vs death)

Stewardson A, …., Harbarth S. EuroSurveillance 2016; 21: 33

62

S. aureus analysis

Group NIncidence proportion

(events/100 admissions)Total length of stay

Median (IQR)MortalityCount (%)

MRSA BSI 163 0.03 31 (16–45) 36 (22.1%)

MSSA BSI 885 0.15 23 (13–39) 149 (16.8%)

Non-infected 604797 - 4 (2–7) 10161 (1.7%)

Group nIncidence proportion

(events/100 admissions)Total length of stay

Median (IQR)MortalityCount (%)

3GCR-E BSI 360 0.06 26 (12.75–45) 58 (16.1%)

3GCS-E BSI 2100 0.35 14 (7–28) 212 (10.1%)

Non-infected 603972 - 4 (2–7) 10105 (1.7%)

Enterobacteriaceae analysis

Outcomes (unadjusted)

Stewardson A, …., Harbarth S. EuroSurveillance 2016; 21: 33

In-hospital mortalityAdjusted proportional hazards analysis

63

Interpretation: Risk of death after bloodstream infection (BSI)

Adjusted for age, sex, emergent/elective admission, comorbidities, nights hospitalised in previous 12 months, plus ICU-admission and surgical procedures as time-dependent covariates

Stewardson A, …., Harbarth S. EuroSurveillance 2016; 21: 33

Excess length-of-stayMultistate model

64Stewardson A, …., Harbarth S. EuroSurveillance 2016; 21: 33

Assumptions for future scenarios

KPMG report, the global economic impact of anti-microbial resistance 2014

Number of death certificates in England & Wales mentioning MRSA

Office for National Statistics online 2010

The way forward

• Comprehensive, population-based antimicrobial resistance surveillance

– Paediatric & geriatric infections

– Community-acquired infections

– Low-, middle-, and high-income countries

– Different types of infections

– Morbidity and mortality data

• Accurate & valid analyses

Summary

• Preventing antimicrobial resistance is desirable by patients and society

• Consistency of data regarding the impact of antimicrobial resistance on clinical outcomes and risk of treatment failure

• However:

– Paucity of data regarding the overall impact of antimicrobial resistance on healthservices and societal burden, especially in LMIC

– Due to methodological limitations, we may have overestimated the attributable mortality and excess costs of antimicrobial resistance

83

Situation in 2050

• 10.000.000 people dying due to antibiotic resistance?

• Methodological challenges & flaws of these projections:

– To predict total number of infections

– To predict the proportion of resistance

– To predict the attributable mortality

• Lack of robust data note of caution:“broad brush estimates, not certain forecasts”

De Kraker N, Stewardson A, Harbarth S. PLoS Med 2016; 13: e1002184

What will happen in 2050?

• The first Rhino will be born on the North pole

• Geneva will be renamed Genève-sur-Mer

• Ivanka Trump, the 1st female US president, will be re-elected for the 4th time in a row

• 10.000.000 people will die from AMR

Courtesy: Marc Bonten (Utrecht)

Thanks for your attention !

Basic Copyright Notice & Disclaimer

©2018 This presentation is copyright protected. All rights reserved. You may download or print out a hard copy for your private or internal use. You are not permitted to create any modifications or derivatives of this presentation without the prior written permission of the copyright owner.

This presentation is for information purposes only and contains non-binding indications. Any opinions or views expressed are of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Swiss Re. Swiss Re makes no warranties or representations as to the accuracy, comprehensiveness, timeliness or suitability of this presentation for a particular purpose. Anyone shall at its own risk interpret and employ this presentation without relying on it in isolation. In no event will Swiss Re be liable for any loss or damages of any kind, including any direct, indirect or consequential damages, arising out of or in connection with the use of this presentation.

Recommended